Understanding Venture Capital

35
Understanding Venture Capital

description

Understanding Venture Capital. Public markets. Where Does VC Fit in the Financial Cosmos?. Users of Capital. Money Managers. Sources of Capital. Stock Funds Bond Funds Hedge Funds Private Equity VC LBO Other. Pension Funds Wealthy Families University Endowments Foundations Others. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Understanding Venture Capital

Understanding Venture Capital

•Stock Funds

•Bond Funds

•Hedge Funds

•Private Equity

•VC

•LBO

•Other

Where Does VC Fit in the Financial Cosmos?

• Pension Funds

• Wealthy Families

• University Endowments

• Foundations

• Others

Fund of Funds

•Entrepreneurs trying to start a business

•Entrepreneurs trying to buy a business

Public markets

Sources of Capital

Users of Capital

Money Managers

Within VC Asset Class

Seed / Incubation

Early Stage

Late Stage / Mezzanine

Multi-Stage

Or by …

• Industry

• Technology

What Is The Point?

• Raise money

• Invest it

• Give back lots more than we took in

• Repeat

Why Do It?

• Oh, yeah, we keep some for ourselves

• Management fees – 2-2.5% per year

• Profits interest: 20-30%

Really, Why Do It?

• Spend all your time on the cutting edge

• Meet very interesting people

• Change the world

• New challenge every day

• Can be very lucrative

Exactly What Do We Do?

• Raise money

• Make investments

• Monitor investments

• Exit investments

Examples

• COMPAQ

• CIENA

• Citrix Systems

What Does VC Mean to an Institutional

Investor?

• Illiquid

• Takedown over time

• Very long gestation

• Series of pools, or “funds”

• Part of small allocation (5-10%) to “alternative assets”

Institutional Investor Perspective

• VC firm is just a money manager with multiple funds

• Difference:– Stock fund money manager – different funds by

strategy– VC fund money manager – different funds by

vintage

Example: Sevin Rosen Funds

• Early stage technology - constant

• Multiple funds

– Fund I (1981) - $25 million

– Funds II (1983) through VII (1999)

– Fund VIII (2000) - $600 million

What is a Fund?

• Legally: a limited partnership

• Characteristics:– Committed capital– Term– Takedown schedule– Investment restrictions– Lots more

Objective

• Make n investments over 1st y years of the fund

• Exit those investments in the 10-12 year term at a profit

What is y?

• Usually target 2-1/2 to 4 years

• Less – too much time raising funds

• More – LPs want chance to re-up more often than that

• Sometimes miss the target

What is n?

• Balance: diversification vs. focus and impact

• Inverse of targeted $ per deal (d)

• d is over the life of the deal– Typically 1st investment is 30-40% of

expected d

How to Set Fund Size

• Function of:– $ per deal (d) – physics of companies– # of GP equivalents– Companies / GP

• Steady state board capacity• Turnover rate

Objective Revisited – Make Money for LPs

and GP

• Measure success over 10-12 years

• Metrics: IRR or cash-on-cash over the life of the fund

• Looking to juice “returns” over public equity (15-20+% vs. 12-15%)

• Spoiled in the boom with 100%+ IRRs

Objective Revisited – Make Money for LPs

and GP• Given 10 year life, we need to make a

multiple of the fund:

10 year IRR 7 year IRR

2x 7.2% 10.4%

3x 11.6% 17.0%

4x 14.9% 21.9%

5x 17.5% 25.8%

8x 23.1% 34.6%

10x 25.9% 38.9%

And That’s Not All

• Layer on top of that:– Historical batting average - .500, plus or

minus

• So 5x the fund means 10x on the deals that work

• On average

So, What Really Happens?

FUND I

36.2x

20.9x

9.6x11.0x

10.4x6.3x

7.9x 9.0x3.2x

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

Capital Invested (in $mm)Capital Returned (in $mm)

Fund I =

$19.6MM

Total returned

$180.6MM9.2x CC

Total invested

$18.3MM93.4% of CC

FUND II

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

42.6x

14.7x

19.4x

9.1x

4.1x

3.0x5.6x 2.1x 3.1x

3.8x 4.0x3.9x 0.8x 1.8x 1.2x

0.8x 0.3x

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

Capital Invested (in $mm)Capital Returned (in $mm)

Fund II =

$60.6MM

Total returned

$223.0MM3.7x CC

Total invested

$53.68MM88.6% of CC

FUND III

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

39.3x

50.8x

4.2x 3.5x2.1x 3.5x 1.9x 0.6x 1.9x

1.0x 0.1x 2.5x

(10.00)

-

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

110.00

120.00

130.00

140.00

150.00

Capital Invested (in $mm)Capital Returned (in $mm)

Fund III =

$65MM

Total returned

$266.3MM4.1x CC

Total invested

$69.4MM106.8% of CC

FUND IV

1.0x0.4x0.2x

1.3x

3.2x3.4x3.2x

8.4x

19.6x

11.3x

13.1x

138.5x

(10.00)

-

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

Capital Invested (in $mm)

Capital Returned (in $mm)

590.00

Fund IV = $65MM

Total returned

$826MM

12.5x CC

Total invested

$66.3MM

102% of CC

Fund I

Fund IV

Fund III

Fund II

So, What Really Happens?

• Fund I – 9.2x overall– 2 @ 20-40x; 3 @ 10x; .529 avg.

• Fund II – 3.7x overall– 2 @ 20-40x; 2 @ 10-15x; .560 avg.

• Fund III – 4.1x overall– 2 @ 40-50x; .409 avg.

• Fund IV – 12.5x overall– 1 @ 140x; 3 @ 10-20x; .526 avg.

Practical Impact

• Capital invested matters

• Valuation matters

• VCs are sluggers, not looking for infield singles and walks

• Focus on potential winners

• Cents on dollar in bad deals not worth much

How Do We Manage Such a Process?

• Deal making – very hard because:– Usually invest before market is clear– Feedback loop very long (and expensive)– Success (and failure) has large luck

component

• Success in other venues no guarantee

• Like sailing blindfolded

Who Are Deal Makers?

• Each firm has deal makers of varying experience– General partner, managing director, etc.– Partner, principal, etc.– Associate, more or less senior– Analysts

Key Role - General Partner

• Make investment decisions– Initial investment is most important

• Help each company be as successful as it can be

• Sometimes less is more

• Help others apprentice

Herding Cats

• Very different models– Cowboy confederation model– Consensus models– Joe Blow Ventures – either you’re Joe or

you’re not

• Lots of blends of these

• Explains a lot of behavior

How We Make Decisions

• Slowly (these days)– Due diligence hell

• Some never tell you no

• The role of partners meetings

• Type of investment matters– New investments– Follow-on investments

How we get paid

• Depends on the model

• Management fee– % of committed capital– Imagine 10 year revenue visibility

• Profits interest (carry)– Helps if there are profits

What Breaks Down?

• Management fee– Role of multiple funds

• Carry– Fund by fund– Sharing philosophy

Wait – What Happens When Fund is Fully

Invested

• You raise another fund

• You don’t

Multi-fund Firms

• Series of partnerships every 2-4 years

• Generally don’t overlap portfolios

• Crossover investing is big issue

• Know what fund you are in, and the rules

• Amplifies the management fee issue

What Can Go Wrong – New Investments?

• Unseen scar tissue

• Bad chemistry

• Bad hair day

• Misjudge the DMU

• Ego crowding

What Can Go Wrong – Existing Portfolio

Companies?• The living dead syndrome

• Chronic fatigue syndrome, VC style

• No money left problem

• Partner on the roof problem

• With some firms, “it’s in their nature”

• GP overload – drive-by board meetings

What Can Go Right?

• Well established firm

• Capital access – direct and referrals

• GP – operating and domain experience

• Other resources

• Know your partner