Understanding the proposed revision of the EU ETS
description
Transcript of Understanding the proposed revision of the EU ETS
Understanding the proposed
revision of the EU ETS
Thomas Bernheim
DG Environment Unit C.2
European Commission
Objectives of EU ETS revision
Ensure a cost-effective contribution of the EU ETS to achieving the 20% GHG reduction for 2020, and to a 30% reduction reached in an international climate agreement
Improvement of the EU ETS based on experience so far
Enhance predictability and certainty for long-term emission reductions
Contribute to developing the international carbon market and encouraging action globally
Overview
Key elements of the Commission’s proposal– Scope
– Targets / cap setting
– Allocation methods
– International aspect
– Monitoring, reporting, verification
Next steps and key messages
Scope
Harmonised coverage of large industrial emitters: extension e.g. to chemical sectors and aluminium
Extension to other GHGs: nitrous oxide (fertilisers), perfluorocarbons (aluminium)
Extension to Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS)
Leading to new abatement opportunities, lower overall costs, and higher efficiency
Potential opt-out of smallest emitters if equivalent emission reduction measures are in place (e.g. tax)
Possibility introduced for Community-level projects
Summary of scope effects
MtCO2 In % of NAP2
No of installations
Extended scope
Streamlining 40-50 2 – 2.5 n.a.
New sectors and gases
Up to 97 Up to 4.6
n.a.
Potentially excluded installations
- 16 -0.8 Up to 5000
Net effect 121-131 5.8 – 6.3
GHG Target
GHG Target:
-20% compared to 1990
-14% compared to 2005
EU ETS-21% compared
to 2005
Non ETS sectors -10% compared to 2005
27 Member State targets, stretching from -20% to +20%
Cap setting
A single EU-wide cap rather than 27 caps proposed by Member States
CO2 allowances available in 2020 (based on current scope): 1720 Mt– - 21% compared to 2005 emissions
Linear decrease – predictable trend-line to 2020 and beyond (annual decrease by
1.74%)– Possible review by 2025 at the latest
Automatic adjustment to greater reduction foreseen in international agreement
Aviation being included, building on December’s Council political agreement
Cap setting
-20%
-30%
2083 Mtyr
Gradient: -1.74%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Figures on the Cap
Figures based on – NAP 2 decisions of the Commission– ETS scope as applicable in Phase 2
• To be adjusted for:– Opt-ins in Phase 2– Extended scope in Phase 3– Inclusion of aviation– Inclusion of Norway, Liechtenstein,
Iceland
EU ETS cap and reductions
1.974 1.937 1.901 1.865 1.829 1.792 1.756 1.720
0
500
1.000
1.500
2.000
2.500
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
year
Mio t CO2 eq
Allowances reduction
Allocation principles
Harmonised allocation rules to ensure a level playing field across the EU:– No distortion of competition– No state aid risks for operators
Auctioning as the general rule with transitional free allocation In terms of allocation rules, three categories of operators:
– No free allocation (i.e. full auctioning) – Partial free allocation– Up to 100% free allocation
European Commission to report on carbon leakage by 2011 and make any appropriate proposal:
- To review free allocation levels and/or- To introduce system to neutralise distortive effects
Binding sectoral agreements to be taken into account In conformity with principles of UNFCCC and WTO
Auctioning
Basic principle for allocation is auctioning:
– Eliminates ‘windfall’ profits– Simplest and most transparent allocation system– Level playing field for new entrants and incumbents
Full auctioning for sectors able to pass on costs:
– Power sector
Auctioning on the basis of harmonised rules ensuring
– Transparency and non-discrimination– Full access for SMEs
Auctioning and earmarking
Range of economic situations in Member States means relatively more auctioning rights to MS with lower GDP/capita to balance high investment costs
– 90% of the auctioning cap is distributed according to the MS share of 2005 Verified Emissions
– 10% distributed to MS with GDP/cap below 120% of EU average– This distribution takes into account GDP per capita and
expected growth rates
Auctions must be non-discriminatory, open to everybody and will be carried out by Member States on the basis of harmonised rules
20% of auction revenues should be used for combating climate change and promoting renewable energies
Transitional free allocation
Transitional free allocation to industry
– in 2013, 80% of allocations for free of quantities determined in accordance with Community-wide rules
– Annual reduction of free quantity
Phased out by 2020 for “normal industry”
Community-wide rules, e.g. benchmarking, for free allocation to be determined taking into account most efficient techniques, substitutes, alternative production processes, use of biomass and CCS
No free allocation for electricity production
Higher free allocations
Installations in sectors which are seen, on analysis, to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage
Can receive up to 100% free allocation of the quantity of allowances determined under the general Community-wide rules
Sectors to be determined at the latest in 2010, taking into account inter alia ability to pass on costs without losing market share to non-EU competitors
New entrants reserve
5% of total quantity of allowances
Equal treatment of existing and new installations
Capacity extensions not considered to be new entrants
Implementing rules to be adopted under comitology.
Sufficient size is important for avoiding carbon leakage,
in particular for fast growing economies
Remainder to be auctioned
Key international aspects of the EU ETS revision
EU’s overall objective: to limit global warming to 2° C above pre-industrial levels
EU wants an international agreement on achieving these levels of emission reductions
This will require contributions from developed countries and major emitting developing countries
Climate / energy package provides incentives for others to join an international agreement
Linking
Currently, EU ETS covers 30 countries including Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein
Linking agreements can be concluded with any other third country listed in Annex B to the Kyoto Protocol which have ratified the Protocol
In revision, Commission proposes to enable EU ETS to also link with other mandatory emission trading system capping absolute emissions:
– with any third country, or – in sub-federal and regional systems
Different types of linking arrangements foreseen:
– Treaty arrangements– Agreements to link systems e.g. through politically binding MoU– Reciprocal commitments applied through domestic systems
Joint Implementation and the Clean Development Mechanism
Links EU ETS with projects in around 150 other countries that have ratified Kyoto Protocol, by providing for companies to use JI/CDM credits for compliance in EU ETS
Revision proposal gives certainty on the potential for companies to use JI/ CDM, whether or not there is an international agreement following Kyoto
Clear need to differentiate between EU’s independent 20% commitment to reduce GHG emission, and the contribution that the EU will make under an international agreement where others are also contributing, e.g.
– JI/CDM are an incentive for third countries to join international agreement– Demand for CDM only from the EU would reduce market-based incentive to
increase energy efficiency, investment in low carbon technologies– EU’s renewables target would become more expensive if EU ETS not
contributing to its achievement
JI/ CDM use without international agreement
Revision proposal ensures that:
– JI/CDM credits can be used up to 2020, by enabling these to be exchanged for allowances
– JI projects can continue beyond 2012, by enabling bilateral/ multilateral agreements with third countries
In a -20% scenario, certainly is given for a total 1.4 billion tons for 2008-2020 (one third of reduction effort over the period) to:
– Credits for reductions in the 2008-12 period from project types which were accepted by all Member States
– Credits for reductions from 2013- from such projects set up in the 2008-12 period
– In addition, credits from such projects from 2013- in any of the 50 Least Developed Countries
– And credits from any bilateral/ multilateral agreements with third countries
JI/ CDM use without international agreement
In addition, climate/ energy package also provides for Member States to use CDM in respect of non-ETS emissions:
– To enhance the equitable geographical distribution– To enhance achievement of international agreement
on climate change– Up to 3% annually of their non-ETS emissions– Corresponding to 700 Mt demand from Member
States, in a situation without international agreement
JI/ CDM once international agreement
Once an international agreement is concluded, the EU ETS will automatically increase the use of credits (JI/CDM/other) by 50% of the additional reduction effort under that agreement
Member States’ use of JI/CDM/other credits will also increase by 50% of the additional non-ETS reduction effort under that agreement
This provides a clear incentive for third countries to join international agreement
Monitoring & Reporting, Verification & Accreditation,
Compliance
More harmonised rules through Regulations on – monitoring and reporting of emissions by operators– verification of reports and accreditation of verifiers
(including mutual recognition)
Non-compliance penalties (€100/ tonne CO2) to increase by inflation rate to maintain deterrent effect
To enhance reliability and thus international credibility of the EU ETS
Next steps
Adoption by Council and Parliament aimed for by Spring 2009
Comitology procedure to start after entry in force of revised
Directive
Preparatory work already started: various pilot studies being
undertaken by MS and Commission
Exposed sectors to be determined by 30 June 2010 at the latest
Community-wide rules to be adopted by 30 June 2011 at the
latest
Implementation by MS by 30 September 2011 at the latest
Issuance of first year allocations by 28 February 2013 at the
latest
Key messages
The ETS is the cornerstone of the EU’s market based-strategy to reduce greenhouse gases cost-effectively
Essential elements of the ETS review:
– Fully harmonised approach – Ambitious cap to ensure real emissions reductions– Improvement taking into account past experience
Open and transparent process for implementation