Understanding the Nature of the Low-energy Enhancement in...

36
1 Office of Science 6 th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma Strength May 8 th – 12 th , 2017 Understanding the Nature of the Low-energy Enhancement in the Photon Strength Function of 56 Fe. Michael David Jones Nuclear Science Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Transcript of Understanding the Nature of the Low-energy Enhancement in...

  • 1UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Understanding the Nature of the Low-energy Enhancement in the Photon Strength Function of

    56Fe.

    Michael David JonesNuclear Science DivisionLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

    This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

  • 2UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Motivation

    • A broad range of applications:

    • Reaction networks, R-process

    • Reactor design, Fuel cycles

    • The PSF is a measure of the average 𝛾-decay properties:

    f (Eγ)≡ f J π(E γ)=

    ΓJ (E x , Eγ)ρJ (E x)

    2λ+1

    𝜎

    𝐸𝛾

    GDR

    Pygmy

    ???

  • 3UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Motivation

    • Recent discovery of low-energy enhancement of PSF has generated great interest.

    What is the mechanism behind the enhancement?

    A.V. Voinov et. al. PRC 74, 014314 (2006)

    S. Frauendorf et. Al. AIP Conference Proceedings 1619, 81 (2014)

    A.C. Larsen et. al. PRC 82, 014318 (2010)

    A.C. Larsen et. al. PRC 76, 044303 (2007)

    A.C. Larsen et. al. PRC 82, 014318 (2010)

    56Fe

  • 4UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Motivation• Generated by large number of weak low-energy dipole transitions (high-lying) of

    all considered spins well above yrast.

    • Possibly M1 although some mechanisms consider E1.

    A measurement of the polarization in the enhancement region is needed to determine its nature.

    A.C. Larsen et. al. PRL 111, 242504 (2013)S. Frauendorf et. Al. AIP Conference Proceedings 1619, 81 (2014)

  • 5UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Experimental Method• Use a direct reaction to populate

    states in quasi-continuum.

    p’

    p

    56Fe

    γ1γ2

    • Extract PSF using a new model independent method [1].

    • Identify events in the “up-bend”

    • Use GRETINA as a polarimeter to measure the M1 or E1 character.

    Figure courtesy of L. Kirsch

    A.C. Larsen et. al. PRL 111, 242504 (2013) [1] M. Wiedeking et. al. PRL 108, 162503 (2012)

  • 6UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Experiment at ANL

    • 56Fe(p,p’) at 16 MeV

    Phoswich Wall (WashU)D.G. Sarantites et. al. NIMA Vol. 790, pg 42-56 (2015)

  • 7UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Extraction of PSF

    • Assume dipole radiation [1]:

    • Model independent

    f (Eγ)≡ f J π(E γ)=

    ΓJ (E x , Eγ)ρJ (E x)

    2λ+1

    N L(E x)∝ f (Eγ)Eγ3ΣσJ (E x)

    Unambiguous entry and exit channel!

    Accept Reject

    1 2 3

    1

    2

    3

    R=f (E x−E L1)

    f (E x−E L2)=

    N L1(E x)(E x−E L2)3

    N L2(E x)(E x−E L1)3

    𝑅 =𝑓(𝐸γ)

    𝑓(𝐸γ′)=𝑁𝐿 ∗ (𝐸γ

    ′)3

    𝑁𝐿′ ∗ (𝐸γ)

    3

    [1] M. Wiedeking et. al. PRL 108, 162503 (2012)

  • 8UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Ratio Method

    1

    2

    3

    𝛿𝐸 ~ 2

    𝛿𝐸 ~ 0.5𝐸1

    𝐸2𝛿𝐸

    Can extract shape but not absolute magnitude.

    R=f (E

    γ1)

    f (Eγ2)

  • 9UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Particle ID

    • Triple coincidence (p + γ + γ) and tagging final states in 56Fe eliminates other reaction channels:

    • (p,α)53Mn

    • (p,pn)55Fe

    • (p,n)56Co

    • (p,pα)52Cr

    228Th56Fe(p,p’)

    (p,α)

    (p,pn)

  • 10UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Calorimeter Gating

    • Measure intensity of feeding to first four 2+ states.

    • Correct for efficiency, branching, and background.

    ΣEγ=E x±500 keV

    56Fe

    E Li

    Accept Reject

  • 11UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Ratios

    • Crossing unity implies a local minimum

    R=f (E

    γ1)

    f (Eγ2)

    Eγ1>Eγ2

    𝛿𝐸 ~ 2

    𝛿𝐸 ~ 0.5𝛿𝐸 ~ 0.3 𝛿𝐸 ~ 1.2

    𝛿𝐸 ~ 2.5𝛿𝐸 ~ 1.5

  • 12UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Photon Strength Function (PSF)

    • Confirm Oslo Method with independent technique.

    • New data for Eγ < 1 MeV (600 keV)

  • 13UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    4+ Ratios

    • Agreement between PSF built with different spins (Jπ)

  • 14UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    • Use Z-axis for reaction plane.

    • 1st and 2nd interaction point give Compton plane.

    Possible thanks to tracking!

    B. Alikhani et al. NIM A 675 (2012) 144-154

    Angular Distributions & Polarization

    Z-axis

  • 15UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Angular Distributions & Polarization56Fe, 847 keV, E2

    55Fe, 476 keV, M1

    N ~ 5MTracked

    Tracked

  • 16UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    • Can improve asymmetry at cost of statistics (1/3)• Ѳ𝑙𝑎𝑏 ∈ 70 − 110 [deg]

    • 𝑟12 > 10 [mm]56Fe, 847, E2 55Fe, 931, M1+E2

    Polarization

    Cuts double asymmetry from ~3% to 6%

    𝑅 ~ 𝐴0[1 + 𝐴1cos 2ξ ] 𝐴1 = 𝑃𝑄

  • 17UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Sensitivity in Low Statistics

    • 56Fe, 847 keV, E2N = 325

    A1 ~ 20%

    • 55Fe, 931 keV, M1

    N= 325 N= 55

    A1 ~ 40%

    Flat distribution is outside 1 sigma

  • 18UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Distortion from Coincidence

    • Calorimeter gating requires gamma-gamma coincidences.

    • GRETINA is asymmetric in φ.

    • Empirically determined with 2+ (847 keV), assumed to be general.

  • 19UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    • Angular distribution agrees with L=1, but may have quadrupole.

    Angular Distributions

    • Polarization is flat.

  • 20UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Enhancement Region [0.5 – 1.5]

    • Angular distribution agrees with L=1, but may be isotropic.

    • Polarization has small excess.

  • 21UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Three-Step Cascades

    • Spectrum of primaries contain some known low-lying states in 56Fe.

    • These originate from 3+ step cascades which leak through due to wide Phoswich gate.

  • 22UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    [0 – 1.5] Enhancement Region

    • Removing triples cleans up the angular distribution:

  • 23UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    • Slight excess at 90 [deg], but consistent with Uniform Dist.

    Enhancement Region [0.5 – 1.5]

    𝑅 ~ 𝐴0[1 + 𝐴1cos 2ξ ]

    𝐴1 = 0.26 ± 0.11 (𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡)

  • 24UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Energy Comparison

    [0.5 – 1.5] MeV [1.5 – 5.0] MeV [6.0 – 8.0] MeV

  • 25UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Conclusions

    • Ratio method agrees with Oslo data.

    • 4+ and 2+ PSF identical.

    • Angular distributions agree with L=1, but contain some L=2.

  • 26UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Next Steps

    • Estimate alignment in (p,p’).

    Need 3x more counts

    • Enhancement Region shows excess at 90o in polarization.• M1 + E1? • Pure E1? • Pure M1 not likely?

    N ~ 250

  • 27UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    LBNL + UC BerkeleyL.A. Bernstein, C.M. Campbell, R.M. Clark, H.L. Crawford,

    M. Cromaz, P. Fallon, L. Kirsch, I.Y. Lee, A.O. Macchiavelli, L.W. Phair, A. WiensiThemba LabsM. Wiedeking

    ANLS. Zhu, A.D. Ayangaekaa, S. Bottoni, M.P. Carpenter, H.M. Davids, R.V.F. Janssens,

    T. Lauristen. Washington University

    W. Reviol, D.G. SarantitesUniversity of Oslo

    A. Gorgen, M. Guttormsen, A.C. Larsen, S. SiemLLNL

    D.L. BleuelOhio University

    A.V. Voinov

    Acknowledgements

    Thank you!

  • 28UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Photon Strength Function (PSF)

    • Strong low-energy enhancement

  • 29UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

  • 30UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    2+ Ratios

  • 31UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Reaction Plane• Asymmetry of GRETINA and Phoswich requires normalization with in-

    beam photopeak.

    • Distribution must be weighted by theoretical 𝑤(Ѳ)• Double-folding

    𝐴2, 𝐴4

    Unfolded Folded

  • 32UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Phoswich Wall Performance

    Energy [MeV] Width [MeV] R = FWHM/E [%]

    15.47 0.778 12

    10.87 0.647 14

    5.47 0.472 20

  • 33UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Motivation• Generated by large number of weak low-energy M1 transitions (high-lying, sum

    coherently)

    • E1 transitions from thermally unblocked states to the continuum (TCQRPA)

  • 34UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    846 (2+)

    • Test sensitivity with first excited state of 56Fe• Compton angle and relative distance (r12)

    56Fe

    𝑟12

    𝑧 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠θ𝑐

    θ𝑙𝑎𝑏γ1

  • 35UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Polarization

    B. Alikhani et. al. NIM A 675 (2012) 144-145

    • Compton Scattering:

    𝑀𝜆

    60Ni: 1173 keV (E2)

    𝐸𝜆

  • 36UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Office of

    Science

    6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017

    Angular Distributions

    • Angular distribution of 846 (E2) relative to 2598 (M1 + E2)

    • Can normalize with source data as well (152Eu, 60Co).

    56FeMultipole character accessible!

    𝑅 =𝐼(847, θ)

    𝐼(2598, θ)