Understanding the Nature of the Low-energy Enhancement in...
Transcript of Understanding the Nature of the Low-energy Enhancement in...
-
1UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Understanding the Nature of the Low-energy Enhancement in the Photon Strength Function of
56Fe.
Michael David JonesNuclear Science DivisionLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.
-
2UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Motivation
• A broad range of applications:
• Reaction networks, R-process
• Reactor design, Fuel cycles
• The PSF is a measure of the average 𝛾-decay properties:
f (Eγ)≡ f J π(E γ)=
ΓJ (E x , Eγ)ρJ (E x)
Eγ
2λ+1
𝜎
𝐸𝛾
GDR
Pygmy
???
-
3UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Motivation
• Recent discovery of low-energy enhancement of PSF has generated great interest.
What is the mechanism behind the enhancement?
A.V. Voinov et. al. PRC 74, 014314 (2006)
S. Frauendorf et. Al. AIP Conference Proceedings 1619, 81 (2014)
A.C. Larsen et. al. PRC 82, 014318 (2010)
A.C. Larsen et. al. PRC 76, 044303 (2007)
A.C. Larsen et. al. PRC 82, 014318 (2010)
56Fe
-
4UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Motivation• Generated by large number of weak low-energy dipole transitions (high-lying) of
all considered spins well above yrast.
• Possibly M1 although some mechanisms consider E1.
A measurement of the polarization in the enhancement region is needed to determine its nature.
A.C. Larsen et. al. PRL 111, 242504 (2013)S. Frauendorf et. Al. AIP Conference Proceedings 1619, 81 (2014)
-
5UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Experimental Method• Use a direct reaction to populate
states in quasi-continuum.
p’
p
56Fe
γ1γ2
• Extract PSF using a new model independent method [1].
• Identify events in the “up-bend”
• Use GRETINA as a polarimeter to measure the M1 or E1 character.
Figure courtesy of L. Kirsch
A.C. Larsen et. al. PRL 111, 242504 (2013) [1] M. Wiedeking et. al. PRL 108, 162503 (2012)
-
6UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Experiment at ANL
• 56Fe(p,p’) at 16 MeV
Phoswich Wall (WashU)D.G. Sarantites et. al. NIMA Vol. 790, pg 42-56 (2015)
-
7UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Extraction of PSF
• Assume dipole radiation [1]:
• Model independent
f (Eγ)≡ f J π(E γ)=
ΓJ (E x , Eγ)ρJ (E x)
Eγ
2λ+1
N L(E x)∝ f (Eγ)Eγ3ΣσJ (E x)
Unambiguous entry and exit channel!
Accept Reject
1 2 3
1
2
3
R=f (E x−E L1)
f (E x−E L2)=
N L1(E x)(E x−E L2)3
N L2(E x)(E x−E L1)3
𝑅 =𝑓(𝐸γ)
𝑓(𝐸γ′)=𝑁𝐿 ∗ (𝐸γ
′)3
𝑁𝐿′ ∗ (𝐸γ)
3
[1] M. Wiedeking et. al. PRL 108, 162503 (2012)
-
8UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Ratio Method
1
2
3
𝛿𝐸 ~ 2
𝛿𝐸 ~ 0.5𝐸1
𝐸2𝛿𝐸
Can extract shape but not absolute magnitude.
R=f (E
γ1)
f (Eγ2)
-
9UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Particle ID
• Triple coincidence (p + γ + γ) and tagging final states in 56Fe eliminates other reaction channels:
• (p,α)53Mn
• (p,pn)55Fe
• (p,n)56Co
• (p,pα)52Cr
228Th56Fe(p,p’)
(p,α)
(p,pn)
-
10UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Calorimeter Gating
• Measure intensity of feeding to first four 2+ states.
• Correct for efficiency, branching, and background.
ΣEγ=E x±500 keV
56Fe
E Li
Accept Reject
-
11UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Ratios
• Crossing unity implies a local minimum
R=f (E
γ1)
f (Eγ2)
Eγ1>Eγ2
𝛿𝐸 ~ 2
𝛿𝐸 ~ 0.5𝛿𝐸 ~ 0.3 𝛿𝐸 ~ 1.2
𝛿𝐸 ~ 2.5𝛿𝐸 ~ 1.5
-
12UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Photon Strength Function (PSF)
• Confirm Oslo Method with independent technique.
• New data for Eγ < 1 MeV (600 keV)
-
13UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
4+ Ratios
• Agreement between PSF built with different spins (Jπ)
-
14UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
• Use Z-axis for reaction plane.
• 1st and 2nd interaction point give Compton plane.
Possible thanks to tracking!
B. Alikhani et al. NIM A 675 (2012) 144-154
Angular Distributions & Polarization
Z-axis
-
15UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Angular Distributions & Polarization56Fe, 847 keV, E2
55Fe, 476 keV, M1
N ~ 5MTracked
Tracked
-
16UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
• Can improve asymmetry at cost of statistics (1/3)• Ѳ𝑙𝑎𝑏 ∈ 70 − 110 [deg]
• 𝑟12 > 10 [mm]56Fe, 847, E2 55Fe, 931, M1+E2
Polarization
Cuts double asymmetry from ~3% to 6%
𝑅 ~ 𝐴0[1 + 𝐴1cos 2ξ ] 𝐴1 = 𝑃𝑄
-
17UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Sensitivity in Low Statistics
• 56Fe, 847 keV, E2N = 325
A1 ~ 20%
• 55Fe, 931 keV, M1
N= 325 N= 55
A1 ~ 40%
Flat distribution is outside 1 sigma
-
18UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Distortion from Coincidence
• Calorimeter gating requires gamma-gamma coincidences.
• GRETINA is asymmetric in φ.
• Empirically determined with 2+ (847 keV), assumed to be general.
-
19UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
• Angular distribution agrees with L=1, but may have quadrupole.
Angular Distributions
• Polarization is flat.
-
20UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Enhancement Region [0.5 – 1.5]
• Angular distribution agrees with L=1, but may be isotropic.
• Polarization has small excess.
-
21UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Three-Step Cascades
• Spectrum of primaries contain some known low-lying states in 56Fe.
• These originate from 3+ step cascades which leak through due to wide Phoswich gate.
-
22UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
[0 – 1.5] Enhancement Region
• Removing triples cleans up the angular distribution:
-
23UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
• Slight excess at 90 [deg], but consistent with Uniform Dist.
Enhancement Region [0.5 – 1.5]
𝑅 ~ 𝐴0[1 + 𝐴1cos 2ξ ]
𝐴1 = 0.26 ± 0.11 (𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡)
-
24UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Energy Comparison
[0.5 – 1.5] MeV [1.5 – 5.0] MeV [6.0 – 8.0] MeV
-
25UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Conclusions
• Ratio method agrees with Oslo data.
• 4+ and 2+ PSF identical.
• Angular distributions agree with L=1, but contain some L=2.
-
26UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Next Steps
• Estimate alignment in (p,p’).
Need 3x more counts
• Enhancement Region shows excess at 90o in polarization.• M1 + E1? • Pure E1? • Pure M1 not likely?
N ~ 250
-
27UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
LBNL + UC BerkeleyL.A. Bernstein, C.M. Campbell, R.M. Clark, H.L. Crawford,
M. Cromaz, P. Fallon, L. Kirsch, I.Y. Lee, A.O. Macchiavelli, L.W. Phair, A. WiensiThemba LabsM. Wiedeking
ANLS. Zhu, A.D. Ayangaekaa, S. Bottoni, M.P. Carpenter, H.M. Davids, R.V.F. Janssens,
T. Lauristen. Washington University
W. Reviol, D.G. SarantitesUniversity of Oslo
A. Gorgen, M. Guttormsen, A.C. Larsen, S. SiemLLNL
D.L. BleuelOhio University
A.V. Voinov
Acknowledgements
Thank you!
-
28UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Photon Strength Function (PSF)
• Strong low-energy enhancement
-
29UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
-
30UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
2+ Ratios
-
31UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Reaction Plane• Asymmetry of GRETINA and Phoswich requires normalization with in-
beam photopeak.
• Distribution must be weighted by theoretical 𝑤(Ѳ)• Double-folding
𝐴2, 𝐴4
Unfolded Folded
-
32UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Phoswich Wall Performance
Energy [MeV] Width [MeV] R = FWHM/E [%]
15.47 0.778 12
10.87 0.647 14
5.47 0.472 20
-
33UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Motivation• Generated by large number of weak low-energy M1 transitions (high-lying, sum
coherently)
• E1 transitions from thermally unblocked states to the continuum (TCQRPA)
-
34UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
846 (2+)
• Test sensitivity with first excited state of 56Fe• Compton angle and relative distance (r12)
56Fe
𝑟12
𝑧 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠θ𝑐
θ𝑙𝑎𝑏γ1
-
35UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Polarization
B. Alikhani et. al. NIM A 675 (2012) 144-145
• Compton Scattering:
𝑀𝜆
60Ni: 1173 keV (E2)
𝐸𝜆
-
36UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA
Office of
Science
6th Workshop on Nuclear Level Density and Gamma StrengthMay 8th – 12th, 2017
Angular Distributions
• Angular distribution of 846 (E2) relative to 2598 (M1 + E2)
• Can normalize with source data as well (152Eu, 60Co).
56FeMultipole character accessible!
𝑅 =𝐼(847, θ)
𝐼(2598, θ)