Understanding Prison Sentences Chris Florian Deputy General Counsel South Carolina Department of...
-
Upload
jennifer-leonard -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Understanding Prison Sentences Chris Florian Deputy General Counsel South Carolina Department of...
Understanding Prison Sentences
Chris FlorianDeputy General Counsel
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Call Us First
• Find out projected maxout and parole dates for a hypothetical sentence.
• We can review the sentencing order to ensure it will have the intended result.
• SCDC General Counsel: • 803-896-8508• [email protected]• Internet sentence calculator: http://www.doc.sc.gov
The Distinction between Parole Eligibility Date and Maxout Date• Parole Eligibility Date
• Earliest opportunity for release• Derived from total sentence• Determination made by parole board• Offender continues to serve sentence under supervision
by SCDPPPS• Date calculated by SCDC based on statutory criteria as
interpreted by SCDPPPS• Maxout Date
• End of prison sentence• Derived from incarcerative sentence• May be followed by supervision by SCDPPPS
Parolable Sentences
• Felony D and lesser offenses with no mandatory minimum• Typical offender will serve between 51% and 65% before maxout
• Service Time• Good Time Credits – SC Code § 24-13-210
• 20 days per month if disciplinary free• Can lose earned credits for a disciplinary offense
• Earned Work/Education Credits – § 24-13-230• Amount varies• Maximum is 1 day for every 2 days employed or enrolled
Service Time Good Time Work Credits
85% Sentences
• “No parole” offenses S.C. Code § 24-13-100• Defined as Class A, B, or C felonies, or offenses exempt from classification• Any offense punishable by 20 years or more
• Cannot be released until served 85% of the sentence• Service Time• Good Time Credits – SC Code § 24-13-210
• 3 days per month if disciplinary free• Earned Work/Education Credits – § 24-13-230
• 6 days per month if participating
• Includes offenses with special parole eligibility provisions in S.C. Code 44-53-370 and -375.
• ALC is split on this issue• On appeal to the Court of Appeals
Service Time Good Time Work Credits
Day-for-day offenses
• Offenses with mandatory minimum periods of incarceration that must be served day-for-day.
• Cannot reduce service time below mandatory minimum through earned work credits or good time credits.
• Example: Nelson v. Ozmint, 390 S.C. 432, 702 S.E.2d 369 (2010)• Requires day-for-day service on CDV 3rd.
Service Time
Sentencing Order vs. Pronouncement, Part I• Boan v. State, 388 S.C. 272, 695 S.E.2d 850 (2010)
• Oral pronouncement: 20 years plus 10 years consecutive
• Written order: 30 years plus 10 years consecutive• “In a situation such as the one on appeal, due
process requires the judge's oral pronouncement control over a conflicting written sentencing order.”
Sentencing Order vs. Pronouncement, Part II• Tant v. SCDC, 408 S.C. 334, 759 S.E.2d 398 (2014)
• Oral pronouncement: 10 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 = 40 years• 6 5-year terms to run consecutively to each other• Or was it?
• Written order: 10 + 5 = 15• Silent as to whether the 5 year terms run consecutively to each other
• Letter from judge: 40 years• “The sentencing sheets were signed by the judge and both attorneys
without objection and are assumed to memorialize the judge's intention no less than what was pronounced from the bench. We see no reason why the Department should not be able to rely on unambiguous sentencing sheets as indicative of the intended sentence.”
• Oral pronouncement and written order found ambiguous. Rule of lenity.• Letter was a nullity because judge no longer had jurisdiction• Boan limited to its facts
Jail Time – What credit counts?
• Full credit must be given for time served prior to trial and sentencing. S.C. Code 24-13-40
• Sentencing judge’s refusal to give credit is an error of law. State v. Boggs, 388 S.C. 314, 696 S.E.2d 597 (Ct. App. 2010)
• Offender gets credit for time in custody even if arrest warrant for particular offense has not been served. Blakeney v. State, 339 S.C. 86, 529 S.E.2d 9 (2009)
Jail Time – What does not count?• Time on escape. S.C. Code 24-13-40• Time before offense is charged. Crooks v. State, 326
S.C. 171, 485 S.E.2d 374 (1997).• Pre-conviction time if sentenced pursuant to YOA.
S.C. Code 24-19-120.• Time while serving a sentence for one offense while
awaiting trial on another• A subsequent concurrent sentence
Subsequent Concurrent SentencesSubsequent Concurrent Sentences
Sentence ASentence B
Under the statute (SC Code Under the statute (SC Code § 24-13-40)§ 24-13-40), the second , the second sentence starts on the date of sentencing!sentence starts on the date of sentencing!
Running them concurrently doesn’t change the jail time Running them concurrently doesn’t change the jail time credit.credit.
Jail Time – Court’s Authority
• The Court may designate specific time for commencement of service of sentence. S.C. Code 24-13-40
• SCDC is obligated to follow the court’s order. Mention v. SCDC, unpublished S.Ct. order filed October 20, 1999.
Jail Time – Setting a Sentence Start Date
• Avoiding the subsequent concurrent sentence problem.• Set sentence start date to same start date as sentence already being
served• Indicate in the “Other” section of the sentencing sheet
Sentence A
Sentence B
Jail Time Credit – House Arrest
• Sentencing judge has discretion whether to award credit:• In every case in computing the time served by a prisoner, full credit against
the sentence must be given for time served prior to trial and sentencing, and may be given for any time spent under monitored house arrest. S.C. Code 24-13-40.
• If it’s on the written order, the defendant will get credit
Eligibility for YOA
• Must be less than 25 years old at time of conviction• Cannot be a violent offense
• Listed in SC Code 16-1-60• Except for burglary 2nd, violent (more on this in a
minute)• Cannot be a Class A, B, C, or exempt felony
• Crimes punishable by 15 years or less
Youthful Offender Program
• Access to additional programs • Release determined by administrative release
authority• Offender serves a minimum period of incarceration
corresponding to seriousness of offense• 6 months to 12 months from assignment of ISO• Offenses categorized by seriousness at:
http://www.doc.sc.gov/pubweb/research/offense_categories.pdf• Administrative release authority approves/disapproves YOA
parole• Considers recommendations from community, victim(s), and
institution
YOA after Relase
• Supervision for at least one year
• Evaluated for unconditional discharge by release authority after one year
YOA: Special Rules for Burglary 2nd
• S.C. Code 24-19-10 has a 3-year mandatory minimum for YOA 2nd degree burglary sentences.
• Both violent and non-violent.• Persons convicted of 2nd degree burglary and
sentenced under YOA must serve 3 years, day-for-day.
YOA: The Non-Conforming Sentence
• Non-conforming means the offender was not eligible for a YOA sentence, but the sentencing judge ordered YOA
• Offenders are typically incarcerated at least 3 years
Eligibility for Shock
• Eligibility is evaluated by SCDC• No convictions for violent or no parole offenses• No previous service at SCDC• Physically and mentally able to participate
Shock Program
• Ninety day incarcerative program• Following incarceration offenders are released
under parole supervision
Addiction Treatment Unit
• All offenders are screened for placement into the ATU• If ordered by the sentencing judge, offender will have higher priority• Otherwise, offenders who are referred are placed randomly as
bedspace is available• Offenders must have at least 9 months until their maxout to be
eligible
Concurrent Federal and State Sentences:The Problem
• Will they really run concurrently?• The federal rule: 18 USC § 3585• Federal sentence starts when defendant arrives in
federal custody• BOP does not defer to State sentencing order• BOP typically accepts custody only if they have
“primary jurisdiction”• Primary jurisdiction is the first jurisdiction to make arrest.
Concurrent Federal and State Sentences:The Solution
• Setser v. United States 132 S.Ct. 1463 (2012)• Coordinate with federal authorities
• BOP must follow federal orders• The federal sentencing judge can order federal sentence
be concurrent or concsecutive• Even before State sentencing!
Two Escape Offenses – the Problem
• There are two possible escape offenses in South Carolina.• Common law escape. State v. Walker, 311 S.C. 8, 426 S.E.2d 337 (Ct. App.
1992)• Statutory escape. SC Code § 24-13-410.
• What are the rules for consecutive or concurrent sentencing?
Two Escape Offenses – the Solution
• Statutory escape. • Term of imprisonment must be consecutive to original
sentence and sentences previously imposed. SC Code § 24-13-410(C).
• Will run consecutively unless order says otherwise.• Common law escape.
• Penalty comes from S.C. Code § 17-25-30 (sentence where no punishment is provided)
• “The court shall award such sentence as is conformable to the common usage and practice in this State, according to the nature of the offense, and not repugnant to the Constitution.”
• Will run concurrently unless order says otherwise.
Changes in Sentencing Law
• State v. Varner, 310 S.C. 264, 423 S.E.2d 133 (1992)• Language of statute controls• But if there is nothing in the statue:
• If the penalty is greater under new statute, apply law as of date of offense
• If the penalty is less under new statute, apply law as of date of sentencing
• State v. Dawson, 402 S.C. 160, 740 S.E.2d 501 (2013)
• 2010 Omnibus Act Savings clause unambiguously detail the Act's prospective application
Final Thoughts
• SCDC is not in court when defendant is sentenced; we are not part of the plea negotiations
• Use the sentencing sheet to make Court’s intent clear• Use the “Other” part of the sentencing sheet
• We are happy to help in preparing a sentencing order to reflect Court’s intent