UNDER TENSION
Transcript of UNDER TENSION
748
Furthermore, what is meant by the phrase " Required-house-physician, A or B2 " ? Does it mean that thisis a first appointment open to newly qualified practi-tipners, unless an ex-Serviceman or registrar with anM.R.C.P. cares to apply ? Or, more charitably, does itmean that a post normally of B2 status is found difficultto fill and offered to A practitioners ?
. To many, I said, this issue is dead. To me, and tomany other newly qualified men, it is very much alive.
A. B.
BLOOD FOR TRANSFUSION
SIR,-In view of the recent correspondence and lastweek’s leading article on this subject, I think it is worthrecording that recently we obtained 30 pints of group-Oblood from the North London Blood Transfusion Depotfor the purpose of exsanguination transfusion. We areparticularly indebted to the director of this unit for hishelp in supplying this large quantity at short notice.
St. Bartholomew’s Hospital,London, E.C.1.
I. P. MACDOUGALLChief Assistant.
NITROUS OXIDE SUPPLIED BY PRACTITIONERSIN MIDWIFERY SERVICE
SIR,—There appears to be confusion about the supplyto general practitioners of cylinders of nitrous-oxidegas for analgesic purposes in maternity cases under theNational Health Service. As the National BirthdayTrust is particularly interested in the provision ofanalgesia to women confined in their own homes, approachwas made to the Ministry of Health for guidance in thematter; and the following is from the Ministry’s reply :
" The position is that if a doctor is engaged by the patientto give maternity medical service under part iv pf the Act,he is in the same position as any doctor giving general medical
service under part iv. He may write prescriptions or mayhimself supply any drug personally administered’-e.g., nitrous .oxide. For drugs so supplied he will receivepayment from the executive council on presentation of aclaim on E.c.10 to the executive council.
" If the doctor is called in by a midwife in emergency, heis not giving maternity medical service under part iv of theNational Health Service Act but is giving services underthe Midwives- Act, 1918. He receives a fee which includes the
supply of necessary drugs and dressings, except that he getsextra payment for certain expensive drugs named in part 2of the schedule to s.i. 1453 of 1948. In such cases, the
patient would have a midwife in attendance and, as youknow, midwives are supplied by the local health authoritywith cylinders of nitrous oxide. Many, but not all, doctorshave cylinders but some may not have realised that whengiving maternity service under part iv they can be paid forany nitrous oxide they supply themselves."
57, Lower Belgrave Street,London, S.W.I.
D. V. RIDDICK
Secretary,National Birthday Trust Fund.
MEDICAL RESEARCH IN AFRICA
SIR,—I am very glad that your correspondent ofOct. 16 (p. 624) has called attention to the attitude (orlack of it) of the Colonial Office to the immense medicalproblems of Africa. I note that he makes no referenceto venereal diseases, but in this respect the officialattitude seems to be much the same as in others.
During 1944 and 1945, as Command venereologist and-dermatologist to the British Army in East Africa, Idevoted fifteen months to the study of the specialproblems of venereal diseases in these territories. Thewar saw an enormous increase in the incidence of venerealdiseases in East Africa, and at the same time providedmeans by which that increase was likely to go on. Inthis respect the V.D. problem has an urgency not presentedby such a condition as malnutrition, which was pre-sumably not changed very much in recent years. It isalso comparatively remediable ; yaws has been virtually" stamped out " in many districts, and comparablemedical " campaigns " on a larger scale would do muchto control the spread of venereal diseases.
Three times since the end of the war have I tried toinduce the Colonial Office to show an interest in theproblem. I have submitted a survey of some 3000words, called twice at the Colonial Office, and writtenletters ; but I have never detected any spark of realinterest. My correspondents in Kenya are still unable to
tell me of any material steps which have been taken tocope with the situation in that country. .
No doubt, as your correspondent says, there is a
shortage of personnel to do the work ; but I am notsatisfied that this is the reason why so little has beendone. The official mind does not seem to be appalledat so many tasks and so few people to carry them out : -.its attitude more resembles indifference, which can onlyresult from a lack of appreciation of the importance ofthe work or from apathy. So long, of course, as this isthe attitude of Whitehall the field workers of the ColonialMedical Service will be frustrated in their work; and,if they are good doctors, many of them will leave theservice as soon as they can.
Meanwhile, what of our trusteeship of the Africans ?London, W.1. F. R. BETTLEY.
UNDER TENSION
SIR,—In his letter on Oct. 23, Dr. West insinuatesthat because I admit the obvious fact that the Muscoviterulers wish to destroy non-Communist States, I musttherefore be a warmonger intent on a preventive waragainst the U.S.S.R. This is a very serious charge,which I deny. In everyday life, a man who is threatenedby a homicidal paranoiac neither reflects, while awaitingthe mortal stroke, that it takes all sorts to make a world,nor decides to murder him first. He does the common-sense thing. If he lives in an ordered and policedState, he calls on the police to protect him, and heno doubt hopes that psychiatrists will cure the paranoiacof his mental aberration in due course. If, on theother hand, he lives in a State without police, law-courts, or psychiatrists, he collects trusted friends andfortifies his house.
This is my logical counter to Muscovite threats. Iam fortunately able to answer Dr. West’s whimsicalquestion about what voices are to be heard in the U.S.S.R.In the Stalin-Tito exchanges, Stalin writes that the ideathat there can be " peaceful development of capitalistelements alongside Socialism is a rotten and opportunisttheory." Stalin also said, in the same Tito-Cominformcontroversy : " Communist parties can live and developonly in open warfare against the enemies of Com-munism." Dr. West’s counter to these bloodthirstythreats seems to be that’no-one is really to blame andthat it will all be the same in 40 years. Very whimsical.very. A mighty droll and fantastical fellow, ’pon myword.
Bridlington. P. D. H. CHAPMAN.
STAPHYLOCOCCAL ENTERITIS DURINGSTREPTOMYCIN THERAPY
SIR,—At the end of the case-report admirablypresented by Mr. Kramer on Oct. 23, I was surprised tofind in the summary the suggestion that " the Staph.aureus, already present elsewhere in the body, wasrendered streptomycin-resistant by the small amount ofthe drug absorbed from the gut."
In the absence of proven facts the subject is one forspeculation ; but it is of great clinical importance.My experience is limited to penicillin, about whichsimilar suggestions are frequently made. I find regu-larly after giving normal dosage of penicillin for 2 or 3days in proper cases and failing to obtain improvement.that a characteristic defervescence by crisis is obtainedby doubling or quadrupling the dose. I would submitthat clinical experience in this and other ways is againstthe theory of education of a bacterial strain to immunityto penicillin.By an interesting coincidence, in the same number of
THE LANCET Dr. Barber and Dr. Rozwadowska-Dowzenko find " that it has not so far been possible totrain a staphylococcus in vitro to destroy penicillin."Furthermore, in Mr. Kramer’s case, the staphylococcuscausing conjunctivitis was present on the face and wastherefore being ingested before penicillin or streptomycinwas administered. Why then did it not cause the fatalenteritis at that stage ? Is it suggested that small dosesof streptomycin not only produced insensitivity to thedrug but enhanced the virulence ?
I believe Mr. Kramer’s second suggestion to be nearer thetruth-" that elimination of the normal intestinal floramay have contributed to the establishment ofthestaphylo-