Ulipristal Acetate in Uterine Fibroids

download Ulipristal Acetate in Uterine Fibroids

of 12

Transcript of Ulipristal Acetate in Uterine Fibroids

  • 8/16/2019 Ulipristal Acetate in Uterine Fibroids

    1/12

     PROFILE

    Drugs

     2012: 72 (8) : 1075-1035

    0012 0667/12/0008 1075/S55 55/0

    Adis © 2012 Sprtnger International Publishing AG. Ali rights reserved.

    liprist l

      cetate

    n Uterine Fibroids

    mie

     D Croxtall

    Abstract

      1075

    1.   Pharm acod ynam ic Protile  1077

    2.   Pha rm aco kinetic Pratile  1078

    3. Therapeutic Efficacy

      1079

    4 .  Tolerability  1081

    5. Dosage an d Adm inistration

      1083

    6. Ulipristal A ce ta te ; Current Status in Uterine Leiomy om a  1084

    Ulipristal acetate, a selective progesterone-receptor

      in vitro

    It also mod-

    In two randomized, double-blind, multinational

    trials of

     13

     weeks' duration in women aged

     5

     mg/day controlled ex-

      5

     mg/day was more ef-

    Uterine bleeding was rapidly controlled by ulipristal

     5 mg/day became amenorrhoeic within the first

    cantly more rapidly for recipients

    A significantly greater median reduction from base-

    n total fibroid volume was observed for recipients

     5 mg once daily than recipients of

    g 13 weeks' treatment (coprimary

    Ulipristal acetate was generally well tolerated in

    Features and properties of ulipristal acetate (Esmya' )

    Featured Indication

    Pre operative treatment of moderate to severe symptoms of

    uterine fibroids in adult women of reproductive age

    Mechanism of action

    Selective progesterone-receptor

    modulator

    Dosage and administration

    Route of administration

    Dose

    Oral

    Frequency of administration

    5 m g

    Once daily for up to 3

    months

    Pharmacoi inetlc profile oral administration of a single

     

    mg dose) in the fasted state. All values are means, unless

    stated otherwise

    Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) 23.5 ng/mL

    Median time to Cmax -1 h

    Area under the plasma concentration- 61.3 ng • h/mL

    time curve from time zero to infinity

    Clearance

    Terminal elimination half-life

    =100

      Uh

    =3 8

     h

  • 8/16/2019 Ulipristal Acetate in Uterine Fibroids

    2/12

    1076

     

    Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas) are the most com-

    mon form of benign gynaecological tumours and

    occur in 20-40% of women of reproductive age.

    They are mostly derived from myometrial smooth

    muscle cells and connective tissue fibroblasts and

    characteristically present as well encapsulated

    fibrotic tissue within the wall of the ute ru s.' ' ' Al-

    thou gh there is some evidence that they may arise

    by somatic mutation,'^'^' fibroids are associated

    with a low propensity for malignant transforma-

    tion.'' ' '^' African-American women have a higher

    risk of developing fibroids than Caucasian women,

    which indicates there may be a genetic link.'^'^'

    Many uterine fibroids go undiagnosed, and the

    majority of women are asymptomatic.'^' However,

    approximately 20-50% of women with fibroids

    will require some kind of clinical intervention.'^'

    In these wom en, the most comm on sy mptom s are

    menorrhagia and iron-deficiency anaemia, which

    may lead to chronic fatigue. ' Other sym ptoms,

    such as pelvic pain and dysmenorrhoea and pres-

    sure effects, which may lead to urinary problems,

    also have a significant im pact on q uality of

      life.'' -'

     ' '

    In add ition, wom en with fibroids may experience a

    higher risk of infertility, miscarriage, preterm deliv-

    eries and complications in late pregnancy.' ^' '

    Symptomatic fibroids are the leading reason

    for hysterectomy, accounting for more than one-

    third of all procedures performed, thus incurring

    considerable healthcare costs. ' '^•'^' Hysterectomy

    is the only procedure for permanent removal of

    fibroids but is not appropriate for women who

    wish to retain fertility.'' '*' The surgical removal

    of fibroids without hysterectomy (myomectomy)

    is an alternative option for women who wish to

    become pregnant, but this procedure does not

    prevent recurrence of the condition.' ' '*' Uterine

    artery embolization is a less invasive alternative

    but may compromise pregnancy due to the risk

    of premature ovarian failure.' '^' All of these pro-

    cedures are associated with considerable post-

    operative morbidity. ' '^ '

    There are several non-surgical treatments for

    fibroids, both hormonal (contraceptives [either

    oral or intrauterine devices], progestogens, danazol,

    However, many of these treatments have q

    tionable efficacy and are associated with adv

    tolerability; consequently, the GnRH agonist

    prolide acetate was, until recently, the only appro

    pharmacological treatment for the condition.

    Therefore, there still remains an unmet need

    an effective treatment of fibroids that is

    well tolerated in the longer term and that o

    women the option of uterine preservation and

    retention of fertility.

    Although the underlying aetiology is po

    understood, hormonal exposure, over expres

    of growth factors, or genetic changes may pl

    role in the pathogenesis of fibroid formatio

    Fibroids usually develop during the reproduc

    years and regress following the menopause,

    plicating a growth-promoting role for estro

    In vivo

     models have shown that grow th horm

    may also act synergistically w ith estrogens in fib

    growth, and the incidence of fibroids is highe

    wom en w ith acromegaly.'^ '^' ' Mo re rece

    several lines of biochemical and clinical evid

    have implicated a critical role for proge steron

    the pa thogene sis of uterine fibroids.'^^ ^^'

    Selective progesterone modulators (SPR

    are a new class of progesterone-receptor lig

    that exert tissue-selective agonist, antagonis

    mixed agonist/antagonist activity in target cell

    This class of compounds has numerous app

    tions in female medicine, including emerg

    contraception, long-term contraception, te

    nation of pregnancy, premenstrual syndrom e

    in assisted reproduction.'^''-' ' Many SPRMs

    also been shown to inhibit endometrial cell p

    feration and reduce endometriotic lesions in an

    studies.'^''^^' This property has led to their ev

    tion for the treatment of uterine fibroids, dysf

    tional uterine bleeding and endometriosis.'^^'

    Ulipristal acetate (Esmya™) is an SPRM

    was initially approved as an emergency co

    ceptive (reviewed by McKeage and Croxtall)

    It has recently received approval for the t

    ment of uterine fibroids'-'^' based on the effi

    outcomes of two pivotal phase III trials, PE

    I (PGL4001 [ulipristal acetate] Efficacy As

  • 8/16/2019 Ulipristal Acetate in Uterine Fibroids

    3/12

    1077

    reviews its clinical efficacy and tolerab ility in

    M edical literature on the use of ulipristal acetate

    s since 1996 (including M E D LI N E and

     clinical tdal registries/databases and websites

    . Searches were last update d 17 April 2012.

    1 Pharmacodynamic Profile

    The pharmacodynamic properties of ulipristal

    iew of features tha t are relevant to the manag e-

    om the Electronic Medicines Compendium (EM C)

    ary of product characteristics.'^ '1 R and om -

    0 mg/day on hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis

    ion following 3 m on ths ' treatm ent (n = 46)t̂ l̂

      12 weeks'

      n = 41),P̂ l which are discussed briefly.

    Ulipristal acetate is an orally active SP RM tha t

    inity to the progesteron e receptor

    coid receptor antago nist activity of ulipris-

    ne.t''*' indicating th at it belongs to a new class of

    In vitro ulipristal acetate inhibits the prolifera-

    a cells by dow n-regulating

    • Ulipristal acetate dow n-regulates the expression

    of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs),

    adrenomedullin and their receptors and m odulates

    the ratio of progesterone isoforms in leiomyoma

    cells but not in normal myometrial cells.''*^' Simi-

    larly, ulipristal acetate enhances the breakdown

    of the extracellular matrix of leiomyoma cells by

    increasing the expression of metalloproteinases

    and decreasing the expression of inhibitors of

    metalloproteinases and collagen, with no com-

    parable effects observed in cultured myometrial

    • Th e prin cipa l effect of ulipris tal acetate is to

    inhibit or delay ovulation and induce amenor-

    rhoea without down-regulating estradiol levels or

    inducing endometrial hyperplasia.t^*' The mech-

    anism by which this occurs is not fully clarified, but

    it may act by inhibiting or delaying the luteinising

    hormone (LH) surge, postponing LH peak if LH

    surge has already started, or by directly inhibiting

    follicular rupture.t'^''*^

    • Ulipristal acetate inhibited ovulation and norm al

    uterine bleeding in healthy women.'^^' Anovula-

    tion rates were significantly (p

  • 8/16/2019 Ulipristal Acetate in Uterine Fibroids

    4/12

    1078

    Cro

      Un like mifepristone, ulipristal acetate does

    not appear to alter endometrial matrix or vascu-

    lar morph ology. Following 12 weeks' treatm ent

    with ulipristal acetate 2,5, 5 or

      10

     mg/day, endo-

    metrial vessels, collagen network and messenger

    RNA (mRNA) levels of VEGF-A were identical

    to baseline during the luteal phase,'^^' In c ontra st,

    mifepristone-induced amenorrhoea was associated

    with increased microvessel density and glucocor-

    ticoid receptor expression and decreased stromal

    VEGF expression,' ' '^'

    • How ever, treatmen t with SP RM s may result

    in changes in the histological architecture of the

    endometrium,''*^''*^' Biopsies obta ined from wo men

    who had received 3 months' treatment with one

    of four different progesterone-receptor modula-

    tors (which included ulipristal acetate) revealed

    evidence of glandular dilatation with each agent

    that was histologically distinct from proliferative

    or secretory endometrium,' ^' ^' Rather, the his-

    tological changes were designated as progester-

    one-receptor modulator-associated endometrial

    changes (PAEC) that should not be confused

    with endo me trial '^^'^'

    2 Pharmacokinetic Profiie

    There are currently no fully published data re-

    garding the pharmacokinetics of ulipristal acetate

    in women with uterine fibroids. Therefore, this

    section discusses briefly the limited pharmaco-

    kinetic data in healthy female volunteers avail-

    able from the EMC summary of product char-

    acteristics focusing on, where possible, the ap-

    proved dosage of ulipristal acetate

      5

     mg/day,'^^'

    • Ulipristal acetate is rapidly abso rbed following

    oral administration, A mean maximum plasma

    concentration (Cn,ax) of 23 5 ng/m L w as achieved

    in a median time of =1  hour (t^ax) following ad-

    ministration of a single dose of ulipristal acetate

    5mg, The corresponding mean area under the

    plasma-concentration time curve from time zero

    to infinity (AUC^) value was 61,3ng«h/mL,'^^l

    • The major active me tabolite of ulipristal ace-

    tate, mono-N -demethylated-ulipristal acetate, has a

    • Coadministration of oral ulipristal ace

    30 mg w ith a high-fat mea l resulted in a C

    that was approximately 45% lower, a dela

    tmax (from a median of 0.75 to 3 hours) and

    A U C ^

      tha t was 25% higher than with the

    ed state.'^^l Similar results were observed

    the active mon o-N-dem ethylated metabolite.

    effect of food is not thought to be clinic

    relevant,'^^'

    • Ulipristal acetate is highly boun d (>98%

    plasma proteins that include albumin, a-1-

    glycoprotein, high-density liporotein cholest

    and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol,'-'^'

    • After inges tion, ulipris tal ace tate is extensi

    metabolized in the liver by cytochrome P

    (CYP) 3A4 to its active mono-N-demethyla

    metabolite and subsequently to di-N-deme

    lated metabolites that are inactive,'^^'

    • The main route of elimination of ulipr

    acetate is throug h the faeces, with

  • 8/16/2019 Ulipristal Acetate in Uterine Fibroids

    5/12

     A cetate: Adis Drug

     Profile

    1079

     are no  pharmac okinet ic da ta available

     in

     women with impaired renal

      as a  result  of its

      is

    ed to alter the elimination of ulipristal acetate,

     in  increased exposure (section  5).'^^

    3 Therapeutic Efficacy

    The chnical efficacy  of  oral ulipristal acetate 5

      was  evaluated  in two, fully pub-

    shed, random ized, double-blind, pa rallel-group,

      I)'^^' or active-

    ro l led , doub le -dummy (PEA RL

     phase III trials in wom en aged 18-50 years

      and  excessive uterine

    Uterine bleeding  was  assessed using  a self-

      in  which scores range from  0 to  >500 ,

     had a  PBAC score >100 during

      1

     to 8 of

     menst ruat ion,

     a

      myomatous uterus

      in  size to a  uterus of 

  • 8/16/2019 Ulipristal Acetate in Uterine Fibroids

    6/12

    1080

     ro

    Table i Efficacy of oral uliprislal acetate in adult women with uterine fibroids. Results from the pre-planned 13-week analyses of the

    domized,

     double-blind, (double-dumm yl^'l), parallel-group, multinational, phase III PEARL trials in women aged 1 8-50 years with sympto

    fibroids and excessive uterine bleeding.P^'^^ Efficacy analyses were evaluated using the modified intent-to-treat'^i or per-protocolP'i

    ulation,

     and missing values were imputed using the last observation during the preceding 28 days carried fonward

    Treatment regimen

    (mg/day)'^

    No .

      of

    évaluable

    pts

    PBAC score

  • 8/16/2019 Ulipristal Acetate in Uterine Fibroids

    7/12

     Ad is Drug Profile

    1081

    In PE A R L I, a significantly greater median re-

     5  mg once-daily

    weeks' treatm ent in the PE A R L I trial

    In P E A R L II, there was no significant differ-

      I ) . ' '

      However, by week 38 of the follow-

      - 44 .8 %

      in the ulipristal

     5 mg/day group a nd

      -16 .5%

      in the leupro-

    Ulipristal acetate also reduced uterine volume

    bo th trials following 13 we eks' treatm ent. In

      5 mg /day achieved at least a

    %  reduction in uterine volume than recipients

    vs 6%; p

  • 8/16/2019 Ulipristal Acetate in Uterine Fibroids

    8/12

    1082

     ro

    acetate 3.75 mg on ce-m onthly grou p over the

    same period in PEARL II . I"

    • In the PE A R L I trial,'^*' the incidence of ad-

    verse events in recipients of ulipristal acetate

    5 mg/da y w as similar to tha t in patients receiving

    placebo. There was no significant difference be-

    tween the treatment arms in the frequency of any

    adverse event with an incidence > 3% (figure  l).'^^

    The most com mon adverse events were head ache

    and breast pain, tenderness or discomfort; the

    incidence of hot flush was

  • 8/16/2019 Ulipristal Acetate in Uterine Fibroids

    9/12

    1083

    Hot flush

    Headache

    Procedural pain

    Abdominal pain

    Nausea

    Fatigue

    Anaemia

    Nasopharyngitis

    Acne

    Breast pain

    Influenza

    insomnia

    Pharyngitis

    n Ulipnsfal acetate 10 mg/day

    D Ulipristal acetate 5 mg/day

    H Leuprolide acetate

    ^  ^

    _e

    10

      20 30 40 50

    Percentage of patients

    60 70

    2.  Comparative tolerability of oral ulipristal acetate in aduit women aged 18-50 years with uterine fibroids. The most frequently reported

     of

     >5

    in any treatment arm) adv erse events from the random ized, doubie-blind, double-dumm y, m ultinational, phase III PEARL II

      Adverse events that occurred after

     the

     first dose

     of the

     study dnjg

     and up to

     week

      17 are

      included. Patients received

     13

     weeks

     5  n = 97) or 10 mg/day  n = 103) or intramuscular leuprolide acetate 3.75 mg once monthly (n = 101

      ,

     e=zer

     vs

     leuprolide ac etate.

      a

      6-month treatment-free follow-

     the changes had mostly disappeared in

    t

    [3637]

    5 Dosage  nd Administration

    For adult women with uterine fibroids, the rec-

     of oral ulipristal a cetate is one

    mg tablet once daily, w hich may be  taken with

     dur-

    g  the  first week of the  menstrual cycle and the

     not exceed 3 months.

      a  patient misses  a  dose, treatment should  re-

     as

     quickly

     as

     possible.

     If the

     dose

     was mis-

    d

      by

      more than

      12

      hours,

      the

      patient should

     the

     missed dose

     and

     resume

     the

     normal

     dos-

    those with uterine, cervical, ovarian

      or

      breas

    cancer.

     The

     concomitant use

     of

     progestogen-only

    pills, a

      progestogen-releasing intrauterine device

    or combined oral contraceptive pills with ulipristal

    acetate

     is not

     recommended

     and a

      non-hormona

    method

     of

     contraception should

     be

     used instead.'^^

    Unless closely monitored, ulipristal acetate

     is

    not recommended  for use inipalients with severe

    renal impairment  or in  those with moderate  or

    severe hepatic impairment, '^^'  Its use in  patients

    with severe asthma that  is  insufficiently controlled

    by oral gluco corticoids is also not recommended.^^

    Like other SPRMs, ulipristal acetate may af-

    fect  the histology  of the  endometrium.'^^' These

    changes are termed P AE C (discussed in section 1

    and  are  distinct from en dom etrial hyperp lasia

    Approximately 10-15

    of

     recipients

     of

      uhprista

    acetate  may  experience end om etrial thickening

    (>16mm) during treatment, '^^'  The  thickening

  • 8/16/2019 Ulipristal Acetate in Uterine Fibroids

    10/12

    1084

    Cr

    end of treatment and the return of menses, as per

    usual clinical practice, appropriate investigation

    is recommended.'3^1

    Patients should be informed that ulipristal

    acetate treatment should lead to a marked re-

    duction in menstrual blood loss within the first

    10 days.'^^' Ho we ver, if excessive ute rine bleeding

    persists, the patient should notify their physician.

    M enses norm ally retu rn w ithin 4 weeks of the end

    of the treatment course.'3^1

    Local prescribing information should be con-

    sulted for more details regarding contraindica-

    tions,

      precautions and warnings.

    6 Uiipristai A ce ta te : Current Status in

    Uterine Leiomyoma

    Ulipristal acetate  5  mg/day is approved in the

    EU for the pre-operative treatment of moderate

    to severe symptoms of uterine fibroids in adult

    women of reproductive age. The longer-term

    tolerability of ulipristal acetate has not been es-

    tablished and for this reason it is not approved for

    treatmen t periods of more than  3 m onths' duration.

    Two well designed trials have shown that, fol-

    lowing 13 weeks' treatment, oral ulipristal acetate

    5 mg/day controlled excessive uterine bleeding in

    >90%   of women with uterine fibroids. Ulipristal

    acetate 5 mg/da y was mo re effective than placebo

    and was shown to be noninferior to intramus-

    cular leuprolide a cetate 3.75 mg once m onthly in

    controlling uterine bleeding. Treatment with uli-

    pristal acetate reduced uterine fibroid volume and,

    for patients who did not undergo surgery, the vol-

    ume reduction was maintained for at least 6 mon ths

    after discontinuing treatment. Over a 13-week treat-

    ment period, ulipristal acetate was generally well

    tolerated in women w ith uterine fibroids.

    Disciosure

    This manuscript was reviewed by   T.

     Al-Shawaf

    Fertility

    Centre, St. Bartholomew's Ho spital, Londo n, U K;

     L .

     Balunondes

    Human Reproduction Unit , Department of Obstetrics and

    Gynaecology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil;

    on this article. Changes resulting from comments received

    made by the author on the basis of xientific and editorial m

    References

    1.

      Chegini N. Proinflammatory and profibrotic medi

    principal effectors of leiomyoma development as a fi

    disorder. Semin Reprod Med 2010; 28 (3): 180-203

    2.  Rein MS, Friedman AJ, BarbieH R L, et al. Cytogenet

    normalities in uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol

    Jun; 77 (6): 923-6

    3.  Mashal RD, Fejzo ML, Friedman AJ, et al. Analy

    androgen receptor DNA reveals the independent c

    origins of uterine leiomyom ata and the secondary natu

    cytogenetic aberrations in the development of leiomy

    ta. Genes Ch rom osom es Cance r 1994 Sep; 11 (1): 1-6

    4.  Schwartz PE, Kelly M G. M alignant transformatio

    myomas: myth or reality? Obstet Gynecol Clin Nort

    2006 Mar; 33 (1): 183-98, xii

    5.  Parker WH, Fu YS, Berek JS. Uterine sarcoma in pa

    operated on for presumed leiomyoma and rapidly gro

    leiomyom a. Obstet Gynecol 1994 Mar; 83 (3): 414-8

    6. Ligon A, Morton C. Leiomyomata: heritability and

    genetic studies. Hum Reprod Upd ate  2001; 7 (1): 8-1

    7.

      Baird D , Duson D, Hill M , et al. High cumu lative inc

    of uterine leiomyoma in Black and White women:

    sound evidence. Am J Ostet Gynecol  2003; 188 (1): 1

    8. Buttram Jr VC, Reiter RC. Uterine leiomyomata: etio

    symptomatology, and management. Fértil Steril 1981

    36 (4): 433-45

    9. Evans P, Brunsell S. Uterine fibroid tumors: diagnosi

    treatment. Am Fam Physician 2007 May  15;

     75 10):

     

    10.  Donnez J, Jadoul P. What are the implications of m

    on fertility? A need for a debate? H um Reprod 2002 J

    (6):  1424-30

    11.  Practice Committee of American Society for Reprod

    Medicine in collaboration with Society of Reprod

    Surgeons. Myomas and reproductive function. Fértil

    2008;90(5Suppl .):S125-30

    12.  Parker WH. Uterine myomas: management. Fértil

    2007 Aug; 88 (2): 255-71

    13.  Flynn M, Jamison M, Datta S, et al. Health care res

    use for uterine fibroid tumors in the United States.

    Obstet Gynecol 2006 Oct; 195 (4): 955-64

    14.  McCarthy-Keith DM, Armstrong AY. Innovations in

    ine fibroid therapy. Th erapy

      2011;

     8 (2): 189-200

    15.  Ravina J, Bouret J, Cirary-Vigneron N , et al. App licat

    particulate arterial embolization in the treatment of u

    fibrom yom ata. Bull Fr N at Acad Med 1997; 18 (2):

    16. Duhan N. Current and emerging treatments for uterine

    ma: an update. Int J Womens Health   2011; 3 (1): 231

    17.  De Leo V, Morgante G, La Marca A, et al. A benef

    assessment of medical treatment for uterine leiomy

    Drug Saf2002; 25 (II): 759-79

    18.  Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids and evidence-based med

  • 8/16/2019 Ulipristal Acetate in Uterine Fibroids

    11/12

    A dis Dru g Profüe

    1085

    0 .  Cohen O, Schindel B, Homburg R. Uterine leiomyomata; a

    feature of acromegaly. Hum Reprod  1998  Jul;  13 (7); 1945-6

    1.   Gra ttarola R, Li CH . Effect of growth hormone and its com-

    bination with estradiol-17ß on the uterus of hypophysecto-

    mized-ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology   Í959; 65 (5);  802-10

    .  Rein MS, Barbieri RL, Friedman AJ. Progesterone; a cri-

    tical role in the pathogenesis of uterine myomas. Am

    J Obstet Gynecol 1995 Jan; 172   1 Pt 1); 14-8

    .

      Maruo T. Progesterone and progesterone receptor mod-

    ulator in uterine leiomyoma growth. Gynecol Endocrinol

    2007;

     23 (4); 186-7

    .

      Hoekstra AV, Sefton EC, Berry E, et al. Progestins activate

    the AKT pathway in leiomyoma cells and promote survi-

    val.

     J Clin Endocrinol Me tab 2009 M ay; 94 (5); 1768-74

    .

      Ishikawa H, Ishi K, Sema VA , et

     a l.

     Progesterone

     is

     essential

    for maintenance and growth of uterine leiomyoma. En-

    docrinology 2010 Jun; 151 (6); 2433-42

    .  Yin P, Lin

      Z

    Cheng YH, et al. Progesterone receptor reg-

    ulates Bcl-2 gene expression through direct binding to its

    promoter region in uterine leiomyoma cells. J Clin En-

    docrinol Me tab 2007 Nov; 92 (11); 4459-66

    .  Yin P, Lin Z, Reierstad S, et al. Transc ription factor K LF l 1

    integrates progesterone receptor signaling and prolifera-

    tion in uterine leiomyoma

     cells.

     Cancer Res 2010 Feb

      15;

      70

    (4);  1722-30

    .

      Chwalisz K, Perez MC, DeManno D, et al. Selective pro-

    gesterone receptor modulator development and use in the

    treatment of leiomyomata and endometriosis. Endocr Rev

    2005;

     26 (3); 423-38

      Pintiaux A, Chabbert-Buffet N, Foidart JM. Gynaecolo-

    gical uses of a new class of steroids; the selective proges-

    terone receptor modulators. Gynecol Endocrinol 2009

    Feb; 25 (2); 67-73

    .  Spitz IM. Clinical utility of progesterone receptor mod-

    ulators and their effect on the endometrium. Curr Opin

    Obstet Gynecol 2009; 21 (4); 318-24

    1.   Ma ruo T, Ohara N, Ma tsuo H, et al. Effects of levonorges-

    trel-releasing IUS and progesterone receptor modulator

    PRM CDB-2914 on uterine leiomyomas. Contraception

    2007;

     75 (6 Suppl.); S99-103

    2.

      Bouchard P, Chabbert-Buffet N, Fauser BCJM. Selective

    progesterone receptor modulators in reproductive medi-

    cine; pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety. Fértil

    Steril

      2011;

     96 (5); 1175-89

    .

      Chabbert-Buffet N, Meduri G, Bouchard P, et al. Selective

    progesterone receptor modulators and progesterone an-

    tagonists; mechanisms of action and clinical applications.

    Hum Reprod Update 2005; 11 (3); 293-307

    .  McKeage K, Croxtall JD. Ulipristal acetate; a review of its use

    in emergency contraception. Drug s 2011 May 7; 71  (7);  935-45

    .

      Electronic Medicines Compendium. Esmya 5mg tablets

    (ulipristal acetate) [online].  Available from UR L; http;//www.

    medicines.org.uk/EMC/medicine/26068/SPC/Esmya-H5-i-mg+

    Tablets+(ulipristal+acetate)/ [Accessed 2012 M ar 7]

    6.   Donnez J, Tatarchuk TF, Bouchard P, et al. Ulipristal

    acetate versus placebo for fibroid treatment before surgery.

    38 .

      Chabbert-Buffet N, Pintiaux-Kairis A, Bouchard P. Effects

    of the progesterone receptor modu lator VA2914 in a con-tinuous low dose on the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian

    axis and endometrium in normal women; a prospective,

    randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol

    Me tab 2007 Sep; 92 (9); 3582-9

    39 .  Ravet S, Mun au t C, Blacher S, et al. Persistence of an intact

    endom etrial m atrix and vessels structure in women exposed

    to VA-2914, a selective progesterone receptor modulator.

    J C lin End ocrinol Me tab 2008 Nov ; 93 (11); 4525-31

    40 .  Attardi BJ, Burgenson J, Hild SA, et al. CDB-4124 and its

    putative monodemethylated metabolite, CDB-4453, are

    potent antiprogestins with reduced antiglucocorticoid ac-

    tivity; in vitro comparison to mifepristone and CDB-2914.

    Mol Cell Endocrinol 2002 Feb 2 5; 188 (1-2); 111-23

    41 .

      Xu Q, Takekida S, Ohara N, et al. Progesterone receptor

    modulator CDB-2914 down-regulates proliferative cell nu-

    clear antigen and Bcl-2 protein expression and up-regulates

    caspase-3 and poly(adenosine 5 -diphosphate-ribose) poly-

    merase expression in cultured human uterine leiomyoma

    cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab  2005;  90  (2);  953-61

    42.  Xu Q, Ohara N, Chen W, et al. Progesterone receptor

    mod ulator CDB-2914 down-regulates vascular endo thelial

    growth factor, adrenomedullin and their receptors and

    modulates progesterone receptor content in cultured

    human uterine leiomyoma cells. Hum Reprod 2006; 21  (9);

    2408-16

    43 .  Xu Q, Ohara N, Liu J, et al. Progesterone receptor mod-

    ulator CDB-2914 induces extracellular matrix m etallopro-

    teinase inducer in cultured huma n u terine leiomyoma cells.

    Mol Hum Reprod 2008; 14 (3); 181-91

    44.  Brache V, Cochon L, Jesam C, et al. Immediate pre-

    ovulatory administration of  30 mg  ulipristal acetate sig-

    nificantly delays follicular rupture. Hum Reprod 2010 Sep;

    25 (9); 2256-63

    45 .

      Palanisamy GS, Cheon YP, Kim J, et al. A novel pathway

    involving progesterone receptor, endothelin-2, and en-

    dotheiin receptor B controls ovulation in mice. Mol En-

    docrinol 2006 Nov; 20 (11); 2784-95

    46.  Narvekar N, Critchley HO, Cheng L, et al. Mifepristone-

    induced amenorrhoea is associated with an increase in mi-

    crovessel density and glucocorticoid receptor and a decrease

    in stromal vascular endothelial growth factor. H um Reprod

    2006 Sep; 21 (9); 2312-8

    47 .  McFarland F, Blithe HaD. Progesterone receptor mod-

    ulators and the endometrium; changes and consequences.

    Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13  (6); 567-80

    48 .

      Mu tter GL, Bergeron C, Deligdisch L, et  al .  The spectrum of

    endometrial pathology induced by progesterone receptor

    modulators. Mod Pathol 2008 May; 21 (5); 591-8

    49.  European Medicines Agency. Assessment report for Esmya

    [online]. Available from UR L; http;//www.ema.europa.eu/

    docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Public_assessment_

    report/human/002041/WC500124088.pdf [Accessed 2012

    Mar 30]

  • 8/16/2019 Ulipristal Acetate in Uterine Fibroids

    12/12

    Copyright of Drugs is the property of ADIS International Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed

    to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However,

    users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.