UIC- ERTMS Conference 2004 · PDF filems word format (official output) test sequence (076-6-5)...

UICUIC-- ERTMS Conference 2004 ERTMS Conference 2004 Managing the MigrationManaging the Migration

Rome 15Rome 15thth ––1717thth December 2004December 2004

ETCS Test Results -LIF

Dr. Jorge Ignacio Iglesias.

Director of the Rail Interoperability Laboratory (LIF) at CEDEX

ETCS TESTS RESULTSETCS TESTS RESULTS


1. Interoperability in Spain.

2. ETCS Test Results.

2.1 Eurobalise Tests at LIF: European Eurobalise testcampaing.

2.2 EVC Tests at LIF: European EVC Test and debugging campaign.

2.3 ETCS Tests on the track: Madrid-Lérida HSL.

3. Conclusions

SUMMARY


1. Spain has one of the most ambitious program in new HSL equipped with ERTMS:2.1 Madrid-Lérida HSL: ERTMS L1-L2 line. In commercial operation with

ASFA (200Km/h).Trackside from Ansaldo-CSEE. Current situation: L1 tests on the line.

2.2 Lérida-Barcelona HSL: ERTMS L1-L2. Trackside from Alcatel/Siemens/Invensys. Current situation: under construction.

2.3 Segovia-Valladolid HSL: ERTMS L1-L2. Trackside from Alcatel/Siemens/Invensys. Current situation: under construction.

2.4 Madrid-Toledo HSL: ERTMS L1-L2. Trackside from Alcatel/Siemens/Invensys. Current situation: under construction.

2.5 Córdoba-Malaga HSL: ERTMS L1-L2. Trackside from Alcatel/Invensys. Current situation: recently granted.

2.6 Albacete-Villar de Chinchilla: Pilot Line. ERTMS L1-L2. Trackside from Bombardier/Invensys. Current situation: finished

2.7 Zaragoza-Huesca line: ERTMS L1. Trackside from Alstom. Current situation: under construction.

2.8 Rolling stock equipped with almost all the EVCs suppliers.

1. Interoperability in Spain


Certification harmonisationSpanish Project Environment

ETCSAlstomSTM-LZBAlcatel/SiemensASFA

ALSTOM

ALSTOM/CAFTAV S-104

ETCSSiemensSTM-LZBAlcatel/SiemensASFA

SIEMENS

TALGOHigh speed

ETCSSiemensSTM-LZBAlcatel/SiemensASFA

SIEMENS

SIEMENSICE-350

ETCSBombardirSTM-LZBAlcatel/SiemensSTM-EbicabBombardier

Bombardier

CAF/ALSTOMVariable gauge

ETCSAlstomLZBSiemens

ALSTOM

RENFE AVETAV S-100

ETCSAnsaldo

ANSALDO

ALSTOM/SIEMENS252

RENFERolling Stock

MINISTERIODE FOMENTO

BOMBARDIERINVENSYSPilot Line

ASFAASFA

LZBSiemens

INFRAESTRUCTURA

MATERIAL RODANTE

CEDEXLaboratory

ADAFNotified Body

ASFA

FIAT ALARISSIEMENS 252

STM-EbicabInvensysASFA

Level 1BombardierInvensysLevel 2Invensys

ETCS

Invensys

GIFInfrastructure

Level 1Level 2

ANSALDOMadrid Lérida

Level 1

ALSTOMZarag. Huesca

RENFEInfrastructure

Level 1Level 2

ALCATEL / SIEMENSINVENSYS / INDRALérida - Barcelona

Level 1Level 2

ALCATEL / SIEMENSINVENSYS / INDRA

Toledo Access

Level 1Level 2

ALCATEL / SIEMENSINVENSYS / INDRASegovia Valladolid

ADMINISTRACIÓN

BOMBARDIERINVENSYSPilot Line

Bombardier/InvensysLevel 1

Level 2Invensys

InvensysInvensys

InvensysInvensysInvensysInvensys

CEDEX-LIFLaboratory


2.ETCS Test Results.2.ETCS Test Results.

2.1 Eurobalise Tests at LIF: European EurobaliseTest Campaign.

2.2 EVC Tests at LIF: European EVC Test and Debugging Campaign.

2.3 Tests on the track: Madrid-Lérida HSL.


2.1 2.1 EurobaliseEurobalise Tests at LIF: EuropeanTests at LIF: EuropeanEurobaliseEurobalise Test Campaign.Test Campaign.

1.1. Main ObjectivesMain Objectives• Consolidation of the Eurobalise Specs (Subsets

036 and 085).

• Status of the development of the products (Eurobalises, Antennas and BTMs) and their compliance with the Specs.

• Upgrade and evaluation of the test tools

• Creation of an Independent and Reference Lab

• Preparation for the certification process



2. 2. ParticipantsParticipants

• EEIG Users Group.

• UNISIG Companies: Alstom, Ansaldo, Bombardier and Siemens

• Notified Bodies: ADAF, Certifer, EBC, RFI,Railcert, AEA Technology.

• CEDEX-LIF: Eurobalise Laboratory



3. 3. Organization and Organization and CalendarCalendar

• Calibrations √ (2003)

• Tests of Balises √ (2003)

• Tests of On-board (Antenna-BTM) √ (first half 2004)

• Interoperability Tests √ (second half 2004)


Eurobalise Test Specifications

UNISIG Subset 036V2.2.1 (Sept 2003)

FFFIS for Eurobalise⇒⇒

UNISIG Subset 085 V2.1.2 (Sept2003)

Test Specifications for Eurobalise FFFIS

Testing Procedures

Test Bench Architecture

TSITSI

EurobaliseEurobalise--BTM BTM teststests

Balise Tests BTM Tests

UNISIG Test Specs review

Imperfections in SUBSET-085 of issue

2.1.2 (May 2005)







Testing Procedures


TSITSI


Balise Tests BTM TestsOKOK OKOK

Conform BTMConform BTMConform Conform BaliseBalise

UNISIG Subset 095 V0.0.5 Eurobalise Airg-gap

Interoperability DemonstrationNot in TSINot in TSI

OK

Specs OK








Testing Procedures


TSITSI

Balise Tests BTM TestsOKOK OKOK

Conform BTMConform BTMConform Conform BaliseBalise

UNISIG Subset 095 V0.0.5 Eurobalise Airg-gap

Interoperability DemonstrationNot in TSINot in TSI

Not OK

Specs shall be reviewed!


Calibrations general SetCalibrations general Set--upup

Test Antenna

Reference Loop

TELE-POWERING

(27Mhz)

UP-LINK

(4.23Mhz)TOOLS



BaliseBalise Tests general SetTests general Set--upup

Test Antenna

Balise

TELE-POWERING

(27Mhz)

UP-LINK

(4.23Mhz)TOOLS



AntennaAntenna--BTM Tests general SetBTM Tests general Set--upup

Antenna-BTM

Reference Loop

TELE-POWERING

(27Mhz)

UP-LINK

(4.23Mhz)TOOLS



Interoperability Tests general SetInteroperability Tests general Set--upup

Antenna-BTM Company 1

BaliseCompany 2

TELE-POWERING

(27Mhz)

UP-LINK

(4.23Mhz)TOOLS



Tests of Tests of BalisesBalises

•Balise Up-link Field Conformity Measurements

•Balise Tele-powering Field Conformity Measurements

•Input/Output Characteristics

•Up-link Signal Characteristics

•Interface C performance measurements

•Balise Impedance

•Cross-talk measurements

•Debris conditions:Free-air, clear water, Salt water, iron ore, metallic plate


List of Tests performed during the campaignList of Tests performed during the campaign


Tests of OnTests of On--boardboard

•Evaluation of Tele-powering Radiation Pattern•Evaluation of Up-link Radiation Pattern•Creation of Signal Pattern for Dynamic Tests•Transmission Tests

List of Tests performed during the campaignList of Tests performed during the campaign

Interoperability TestsInteroperability Tests

•Longest Uninterrupted Contact Distance (Subset-095, 7.1) in Free Air, Clear Water, Salt Water, Metallic Plate 1 and MetallicPlate 2•Cross-talk, One Antenna - One balise (Subset-095, 7.6) (only in Free Air)•Each Antenna-BTM with the four balises.


Calibration Tests


Tested Balises from the four manufacturers (ANS, BTS, ALS, SIE)


Debris Box filling-up for the Balise Clear-Water Tests

Preparation for the Reference Loop Calibration under clear

water debris


Balise Test under the Metallic-Plate Debris Condition

Testing on the Balise under Iron-Ore Debris condition


InteroperabilityTests under salt

water debris condition


EurobaliseEurobalise Tests at LIF: ConclusionsTests at LIF: Conclusions

•All the existing eurobalises and BTMs have been tested during the campaign.

•Some of the tested equipments are not fully compliant with the specs. The related suppliers have started the development of a new product.

•After analysing the interoperability demonstration tests, it can be assured the goodness of the specs: 1) All the compliantBalises and BTMs are interoperable. 2) When a constituent is not fully compliant some interoperability tests have failed.

•Notify Bodies have participated in an active way in order to know the correct way of certifying balises and BTMs.

•LIF has demonstrated his ability to perform this certification tests.

Specs OK!


2.2 2.2 EurocabEurocab Tests at LIF: European EVC Tests at LIF: European EVC Test and Debugging Campaign.Test and Debugging Campaign.

1.1. Main ObjectivesMain Objectives1. Harmonisation and consolidation of the SRS interpretations

adopted by each company.

2. Debugging of the On Board Unit Test Sequences ( Subset 076) in a neutral Lab (LIF-CEDEX).

3. Definition of all needed interfaces for testing EVCs

4. Debugging and validation of CEDEX- Eurocab Lab tools.

5. Participation of the NoBos to know the way of testing an EVC for certification.

6. DMI harmonisation.


2. 2. ParticipantsParticipants

• EEIG Users Group.

• UNISIG Companies: Alstom, Ansaldo, Bombardier, Invensys and Siemens

• Notified Bodies: They will start to participate in February 2005.

• CEDEX-LIF: Eurocab Laboratory



3. 3. Organization and Organization and CalendarCalendar• Unisig L1 Tests with Ansaldo, Alstom, Invensys and

Siemens EVCs√ (January-June 2004). In this period also tests based on the Madrid-Lérida line have been executed at LIF

• Unisig L2 Tests with Ansaldo, Alstom, Invensys and Siemens EVCs (July- December 2004)

• Test with Bombardier (January 2005)

• Official tests with Notify Bodies (February-April 2005)



UNISIG On-Board Unit Test Specifications

UNISIG Subset 026 System Requirement Specifications (SRS)

On Board Test Bench

Architecture

UNISIG Subset 094-0 v1.0.0 June 2003 ⇒⇒

⇒⇒UNISIG Subset 076 v2.2.1 Junio 2003

System Test Specifications

Procedures (Test

Sequences)

TSITSI

Test Sequences are underUNISIG review. To be

finished by March 2005

L0L0--L1L1

L0L0--L1L1--L2L2


TEST SPECIFICATIONS WRITINGTEST SPECIFICATIONS WRITING--DOWN PROCEDUREDOWN PROCEDURE

Ms Access DATABASE (TC and TSS) (076-6-1)

FEATURE LIST

(Subset-076-5-1)

TEST SUB-SEQUENCE CREATION (076-6-2)

DATABASE MANAGER TOOL

SRS 2.2.2 (Subset-026)

TEST CASES

(Subset-076-5-2)

TEST FRAMES

Subset-076-4-2

Definition of a procedure to concatenate TSS

TEST SEQUENCE CREATION (Simple List of TSS and TC’s)

Automatic Test Case Coverage analysis

(076-6-4)

Traceability to theS.R.S 2.2.2 (076-5-4)

TEST SEQUENCES (076-6-3) Ms Word format (Official

Output)

TEST SEQUENCE (076-6-5) Electronic format (appropriate

for Lab)

TEST SEQUENCE WIZARD TOOL


ON BOARDINDUSTRIALEQUIPMENT

TIU

EURORADIOBTM

STM

JRU ODODMI

DRIVEROR

EMULATOR

LOOP

EURORADIO COM.SIMULATOR

RCS

FFFIS (wired)

ETCS L2 TRACKSIDESIMULATOR

L2TS

EUROLOOP SIGNALGENERATOR

LSG

FFFIS

ETCS LEVEL STMTRACKSIDE SIMULATOR

LSTMTS

STM CODING &COMMUNICATION

STMCC

FFFIS

FFFIS

DATA EXCHANGE


L1TS

EUROBALISE SIGNALGENERATOR

BSG

FFFIS

SCENARIOCONTROLLER

SC

MODULE EVENT RECORDERMER

SCENARIOGENERATOR

SG

JRU DOWNLOADEVALUATION MODULE

DEM

TRIP ANALYSIS &VALIDATION

TAV

DMI EVENTRECORDER

DER

SPEED SENSOR SIMULATOR

SSSSPEED

TIU Signals

TIUSIMULATOR

TIUS

ODOADAPTOR

TIUADAPTOR

TRAIN MOTIONSIMULATOR

TMS

Air transmission

EVC under test

ADAPTOR FFFIS

ADAPTOR FFFIS

Future

Implemented

JRU VIEWERDMI Input tool

LIF EUROCAB ARCHITECTURELIF EUROCAB ARCHITECTURE

UNISIG Test Sequence Data Base (Subset-076-6-3)

Test Sequence Wizard (TSW)


LIF LIF Eurocab LaboratoryEurocab Laboratory


Test execution at Test execution at eurocab Labeurocab Lab


Eurobalise interface at LIF-Eurocab Lab.


A Test Sequence is A Test Sequence is evaluated by analysing the evaluated by analysing the data from:data from:

••DMIDMI

••JRUJRU

••TIU (SB TIU (SB oror EB EB applicationapplication, , main main swithswith,,pantographpantograph...)...)

••All the events generatedAll the events generated by by the the laboratorylaboratory (radio (radio or Balise messagesor Balise messages))

All these events All these events are are recorded in the recorded in the TER(TER(trip event trip event recorderrecorder) ) tooltool

All these All these data are data are automatically evaluated automatically evaluated by by the Trip Validation Tool the Trip Validation Tool (TAV)(TAV)


ON BOARDINDUSTRIALEQUIPMENT

TIU

EURORADIOBTM

STM

JRU ODODMI

DRIVEROR

EMULATOR

LOOP

EURORADIO COM.SIMULATOR

RCS

FFFIS (wired)


L2TS

EUROLOOP SIGNALGENERATOR

LSG

FFFIS

ETCS LEVEL STMTRACKSIDE SIMULATOR

LSTMTS

STM CODING &COMMUNICATION

STMCC

FFFIS

FFFIS

DATA EXCHANGE


L1TS

EUROBALISE SIGNALGENERATOR

BSG

FFFIS

SCENARIOCONTROLLER

SC

MODULE EVENT RECORDERMER

SCENARIOGENERATOR

SG

JRU DOWNLOADEVALUATION MODULE

DEM

TRIP ANALYSIS &VALIDATION

TAV

DMI EVENTRECORDER

DER

SPEED SENSOR SIMULATOR

SSSSPEED

TIU Signals

TIUSIMULATOR

TIUS

ODOADAPTOR

TIUADAPTOR

TRAIN MOTIONSIMULATOR

TMS

Air transmission

EVC under test

ADAPTOR FFFIS

ADAPTOR FFFIS

Future

Implemented

JRU VIEWERDMI Input tool

LIF EUROCAB ARCHITECTURELIF EUROCAB ARCHITECTURE

UNISIG Test Sequence Data Base (Subset-076-6-3)

Test Sequence Wizard (TSW)


1.1. Remarkable differences among the Remarkable differences among the DMIsDMIs from various from various companies:companies: : Different menus, presentation and messages: Different menus, presentation and messages

2.2. Divergent SRS interpretationsDivergent SRS interpretations (already reported to each (already reported to each company and started to be solved during a UNISIG common company and started to be solved during a UNISIG common meeting (Nov 30meeting (Nov 30thth 2004)2004)..

3.3. EVC malfunctioning. Wrong implementation of some EVC malfunctioning. Wrong implementation of some requirements. requirements.

4.4. L2 tests were interrupted due to different implementations of L2 tests were interrupted due to different implementations of the the Euroradio Euroradio protocol. After a common UNISIG agreement protocol. After a common UNISIG agreement (October 2004) tests were restarted. LIF staff have checked the (October 2004) tests were restarted. LIF staff have checked the conformity of all conformity of all EVCsEVCs with the common interpretation.with the common interpretation.

5.5. Differences in messages stored in the JRU (JRU Differences in messages stored in the JRU (JRU UnisigUnisig WG is WG is already working with CEDEX staff to solve the inconsistencies already working with CEDEX staff to solve the inconsistencies found in the found in the JRUspecsJRUspecs ).).

2.2 EVC Tests at LIF : First conclusions.2.2 EVC Tests at LIF : First conclusions.


1.1. A document showing the main differences among the A document showing the main differences among the DMIsDMIs were generated by CEDEX staff.were generated by CEDEX staff.

2.2. This document compares each specific implementation This document compares each specific implementation with the DMI document distributed by the Users Group with the DMI document distributed by the Users Group (Operational DMI Information. May 2004).(Operational DMI Information. May 2004).

3.3. An Spanish group led by RENFE (with CEDEX An Spanish group led by RENFE (with CEDEX participation) have written down a proposal trying to participation) have written down a proposal trying to harmonize the most significant differences observed harmonize the most significant differences observed during the EVC Test campaign.during the EVC Test campaign.

4.4. This proposal was presented in Madrid on October 28This proposal was presented in Madrid on October 28thth

2004 to the ERTMS Users Group and CENELEC DMI 2004 to the ERTMS Users Group and CENELEC DMI group. It is a first step in the way of harmonizing the DMI.group. It is a first step in the way of harmonizing the DMI.

DMI DMI HarmonizationHarmonization


2.3 ETCS Tests on the track: Madrid2.3 ETCS Tests on the track: Madrid--LéridaLérida HSL.HSL.


2.3 ETCS Tests on the track: Madrid2.3 ETCS Tests on the track: Madrid--LéridaLérida HSL.HSL.•ERTMS Tests at Madrid-Lérida HSL are being performed from June 2003 with Talgo-BTS(Siemens EVC), Alstom and Ansaldo trains.

•CEDEX-LIF is participating on behalf of RENFE in the independent evaluation of the tests.

•Some of the test scenarios were run first at LIF-Eurocab lab. Different specs interpretations appeared during these tests were solved before going to the real track.

•Test are evaluated both by analysing the data downloaded from the JRU ( by means of the tool developed at LIF) and also by the recording from the DMI.

•The behaviour of the tested EVCs is good enough. Real interoperability is being tested.


3.3.-- General Conclusions IGeneral Conclusions I1. CEDEX-LIF is the first neutral and independent laboratory

able to perform interoperability tests among all the European suppliers.

2. LIF is currently performing tests on Eurobalises, Antenna+BTM and EVCs from all the European suppliers.

3. These test campaigns, supported by the ERTMS Users Group, are solving different interpretations of the specifications adopted by each UNISIG company.

4. ETCS tests at LIF have helped to consolidate the EurobaliseSpecs(036 and 085). It is the first time that Unisig System Test Specs(076) have been run in a neutral Lab.


5. The existence of neutral forums as LIF is becoming quite important to assure the convergence among the different companies during the process of ERTMS consolidation.

6. It has been shown the importance of reproducing a real line in the lab before testing on the track. The later good behaviour of the EVCs on the track has demonstrated that real interoperability can be achieved faster by performing these lab tests.

7. The existence of neutral and reference labs as LIF should be extended to other European countries.

8. Notify Bodies should use these neutral labs to perform the certification tests for all the ERTMS constituents and subsystems.

3.3.-- General Conclusions IIGeneral Conclusions II

UIC- ERTMS Conference 2004 · PDF filems word format (official output) test sequence (076-6-5)...

Documents

Transcript of UIC- ERTMS Conference 2004 · PDF filems word format (official output) test sequence (076-6-5)...