UDF-2

download UDF-2

of 3

Transcript of UDF-2

  • 7/24/2019 UDF-2

    1/3

    ATexasSizedScheme

    ExposingtheDarkestCorneroftheREITBusiness

    UnitedDevelopmentFunding(UDF)

    1

    "Onlywhenthetidegoesoutdoyoudiscoverwhosbeenswimmingnaked."Sixyearsago,theFederalReserveset

    inmotiononeofthegreatestfinancialexperimentsonrecord: settinginterestratesatzeroandseeingwhat

    happens.Tothispoint,theresulthasbeenmassiveassetreflation.Whilewhathappensnextisstillthegreat

    unknown,low

    interest

    rates

    and

    rising

    asset

    values

    have

    provided

    great

    cover

    for

    many

    mistakes

    made

    over

    the

    pastsixyearsacrossallassetclasses.TheFedhastrulybeentherisingtidethathasliftedalmostallboats.Amid

    thisrisingtide,anassetclassbestknownaspublicnontradedREITsemergedasaprominentretirementproduct

    soldalmostexclusivelytoretailinvestors.Whenthetidegoesout,publicnontradedREITswillbeexposedforthe

    terriblyflawedeconomicsonwhichthe$100billiondollarbusinesswasbuilt.

    ApublicnontradedREITispublicbecauseithastheminimumnumberofshareholdersrequiredtobepublic;itis

    nontradedbecauseitisnotlistedortradedonamajorstockexchange.Thisproductissoldtoretireesasalow

    risk,longtermincomeproducingassetthatisnotsubjecttostockmarketvolatilitypedaledasafixedincome

    productwithoutexposuretointerestrates. Inreality,aninvestmentinapublicnontradedREITistypicallyan

    investmentinanilliquidstartuprealestatecompanythatmustaccumulateassetsquicklyandissubjecttothe

    samemarketrisks(orgreatermarketrisks)asitspubliclytraded,moreliquidpeerswhichbenefitfromlowercosts

    ofcapital.

    Whenboileddowntotheleastcommondenominator,publicnontradedREITsexistbecauseofhighupfront

    commissionsthatprovidetheincentiveforfinancialadviserstosacrificetheirclientsbestinterestfortheirown

    personalgreed. PriortoanontradedREITeverpurchasinganassetwhichmayormaynotgeneratefuture

    positivereturns,tentofifteenpercentofaninvestorscapitalisconsumedbyupfrontofferingfees,broker

    commissionsandassetoriginationfees.Whilethehighupfrontfeeloadincentsinvestmentadviserstopushthe

    productandisaprimaryreasonwhypublicnontradedREITsexist,itisalsowhysomanyaresettofailfromthe

    beginning.

    ThelowinterestrateenvironmenthasalsocontributedtothegrowthofthenontradedREITassetclass.Yield

    starvedretailinvestorsarepromisedabovemarketreturnsandthenontradedREITsdeliver,atleastinitially.How

    cananontradedREITwithnoassetstostart,subjecttoexorbitantfeesandcommissions,deliverabovemarket

    returnsalmostimmediately?First,brokersmarktheinvestmentontheinvestorsstatementsattheofferingprice

    andnotthenetpriceafterfeesthatfrequentlyexceed10%. Second,byraisingnewcapitalsubjectto

    astronomicallyhigh(somemightevensaycriminal)feesandcommissionsandpartiallyusingthenewcapitalto

    funddistributionstoshareholders.Thepracticeofpayingdistributionstocommonshareholdersbyraisingmore

    highfrictioncapitalfromnewshareholders(ratherthanincomegeneratedfromassets)isirrational,but

    unfortunately,hasbeenastapleofthenontradedREITuniverseoverthepastseveralyears.

    TheSecurities

    and

    Exchange

    Commission

    (SEC)

    describes

    aPonzi

    scheme

    as

    an

    investment

    fraud

    that

    involves

    the

    paymentofpurportedreturnstoexistinginvestorsfromfundscontributedbynewinvestors.Notallnontraded

    REITsarePonzischemes,butalmostallnontradedREITsshareoneofthehallmarksofaPonzischemefunding

    distributionstoshareholderswithfundscontributedbynewinvestors. ThedifferenceisthatnontradedREITs

    plainlydisclosethispractice. Theissueissystemic,andtheSECisfullyawareoftheproblem,highlightingnon

    tradedREITsasoneofthefivemostseriousproblemsaffectingretailinvestorsgoinginto2015.

  • 7/24/2019 UDF-2

    2/3

    ATexasSizedScheme

    ExposingtheDarkestCorneroftheREITBusiness

    UnitedDevelopmentFunding(UDF)

    2

    TheFederalReserve,bykeepinginterestratesnearzero,hasmaskedthetrueextentoftheproblemasrisingasset

    valueshavepartiallyoffsetthecarnagecreatedbymassivefeesandirrationaldistributionpractices.Intherare,

    mostfavorablescenarios,nontradedREITmanagersmanagetoreturnprincipalatpar.Retailinvestorsconsider

    thisawin

    and

    are

    none

    the

    wiser;

    not

    appreciating

    that

    their

    illiquid

    investment

    significantly

    underperformed

    publiclylistedpeers.TheMSCIREITindexhasalmostdoubledinthepastsixyearswhilenontradedREITsstruggle

    toreturnpar;usuallyapremiumispaidforliquidity,nottheotherwayaround.

    Inthelessfavorable,moretypicalscenarios,netassetvaluesactuallydeclineasthesecompaniesmortgagedthe

    futuretopayoutsizedcurrentreturns,despitesignificantappreciationinrealestatevalues.Inthemostegregious

    circumstances,abusinessmodelthatwasflawedtostart(andmadeworsebybadstewardship)evolvesinto

    somethingthatlooksmorelikeaPonzischemethanarealestatebusinessaspoorinvestmentsaremaskedby

    additionalcapitalraises.Badbusinessdecisionsbegetmorebadbusinessdecisionsandultimatelydevolvetothe

    pointwheremaintainingtheschemeovercomeseffortstogeneratelegitimatereturns.

    Thefollowing

    will

    detail

    one

    of

    the

    most

    egregious

    cases.

    RCS

    Capital

    (RCAP)

    has

    been

    the

    funding

    mechanism

    by

    whichretailcapitalhasunassuminglyandconsistentlymadeitswaytoUnitedDevelopmentFunding(UDF).

    Thelargestvintagetodate,UnitedDevelopmentFundingIV(UDFIV,Nasdaqticker:UDF),marketsitselftoretail

    investorsasanopportunitytodiversifyportfolioswithuniqueandfundamentallysoundinvestmentsinaffordable

    residentialrealestate. Inreality,UDFIVisamortgageREITwithahighconcentrationofrisktoasingleborrower

    andispartofalargerfamilyofREITsundertheUnitedDevelopmentFundingumbrella,whichoperatespublicly

    listedandpublicnontradedREITs.

    TheUDFumbrellaexhibitscharacteristicsemblematicofaPonzischeme:(1)newcapital,bothequityanddebt,is

    usedtofunddistributionstoexistinginvestors;(2)subsequentUDFcompaniesprovidesignificantliquidityto

    earliervintage

    UDF

    companies,

    allowing

    them

    to

    pay

    earlier

    investors;

    and

    (3)

    ifthe

    funding

    mechanism

    funneling

    retailcapitaltothelatestUDFcompanyishalted,theearlierUDFcompaniesdonotappeartobecapableof

    standingaloneandtheentirestructurewilllikelyunravel,withinvestorsleftholdingthebag.

    UDFI,thefirstiteration,appearstohavebegunasaprivateentityownedbylimitedpartners,prefinancialcrisis,

    investingasarealestatedeveloperandasalendertorealestatedevelopersandhomebuilders.UDFIwaslong

    realestate,inaleveredway,attheworsttimetobeleveredandlongrealestate.AsUDFIbegantofalterduring

    thefinancialcrisis,itappearsthatcapitalfromapublicnontradedentity,UnitedMortgageTrust(UMT),wasused

    tohelpbailoutUDFI.UDFIandUMTareaffiliates,sharingcommonmanagement,andmanagementdecidedto

    issueloansfromUMTtoUDFI,allowingUDFIanditssubsidiariestorepayvarious3rdpartydebt.

    Unfortunately,UMT

    was

    in

    the

    core

    business

    of

    issuing

    sub

    prime

    residential

    mortgages,

    and

    this

    core

    business

    deterioratedrapidly. EnterUnitedDevelopmentFundingIII(UDFIII),aseparatepublicnontradedaffiliate,also

    undercommonmanagementcontrol,whichwasusedtopurchaseasignificanteconomicparticipationinterestin

    UMTsloantoUDFI,whichhappenedtogrowexponentiallythroughoutthefinancialcrisis,evenasUDFI

    defaultedon3rdpartyloans. Throughthismechanism,UDFIIIretailcapitalappearstohavebeenusedtorepay

    UMTretailcapitalwhichwasusedtobailoutUDFI. AndthePonzilikerealestateschemewassetinmotion.

  • 7/24/2019 UDF-2

    3/3

    ATexasSizedScheme

    ExposingtheDarkestCorneroftheREITBusiness

    UnitedDevelopmentFunding(UDF)

    3

    Astheproblemgrew,UDFpartneredwithRCAPtoraisealargerpooloffundsviaUDFIV.UDFIVhassince

    providedliquiditytoUDFI,UMTandUDFIII,amongotheraffiliates,furtherexacerbatingtheproblemand

    perpetuatingthescheme.AfterraisingcapitalasanontradedREIT,UDFIVcloseditsofferingandlistedonthe

    Nasdaqin

    June

    2014.

    As

    prior

    vintages

    continually

    needed

    asource

    of

    liquidity,

    RCAP

    was

    once

    again

    called

    upon

    toraisetheequity,thistimethroughthelatestvintage,UDFV,withamaximumofferingsizeof$1billion.

    EachsubsequentUDFentityappearstooperatethesamebusiness,inthesamemarkets,lendingtothesame

    borrowers,oftenontheexactsamedevelopments.Thesamethreeborrowerscollectivelyaccountfor90%ofboth

    UDFIIIandUDFIV,withthelargestborroweraccountingforapproximately43%and67%,respectively.What

    legitimatelenderwouldexposeitselftothislevelofconcentratedcreditrisk,andwhydomultipleentitiesexistto

    dothesameexactthing?

    ManagementatUDFwillarguethatithasbeenaprincipalbeneficiaryoflowinterestrates,thestrengthofthe

    housingrecovery,thestrengthoftheTexaseconomyspecificallyand,ultimately,risingassetvaluesthathave

    followed;it

    will

    also

    maintain

    that

    its

    loans

    are

    fully

    covered

    by

    appreciating

    collateral

    values.

    The

    macroeconomic

    argumentsmakeperfectsense. HowcouldarealestatelenderinDallas,Texas,beunderwatersixyearsintoa

    steadyrecovery? Onthesurface,theexplanationinvolvesinheritingpastsinsofformerfundsthatpredatethe

    financialcrisis,poorstewardship,unregulatedlending,andaflawedbusinessmodel. Belowthesurface,the

    explanationislikelyalotmoresinister.

    Visitstoactualdevelopmentsites,whichserveascollateraltoUDFdevelopmentloans,showthat,innumerous

    instances,thereisnodevelopmentandthecollateralisstillnonincomeproducing,rawland2,3,5(asmuchas10)

    yearsafterloanswereissued.Wheredidallthemoneygoifnottodevelopments?

    ThereisalsoevidencethatUDFVhasindirectlyusednewretailcapitaltoprovideliquiditytoaffiliates,despite

    specificallystating

    in

    its

    prospectus

    that

    it

    would

    not

    engage

    in

    these

    practices.

    It

    also

    appears

    that

    seventy

    five

    percentofUDFVsloanstodatehavebeenissuedtothesinglelargestborrowerofbothUDFIIIandUDFIV,and

    thesenewloanshavebeenused,inthemajorityofcases,torepayoldloansissuedbyUDFIIIandUDFIV. Inshort,

    UDFVappearstobethenewmechanismtoprovideliquiditytoUDFIIIandUDFIV. SimilartoaPonzischeme,it

    appearsthatUDFVinvestorcapitalisbeingusedtoreturncapitaltoUDFIIIandUDFIVinvestors.Eachdaythatit

    persists,newvictimsarecreatedwiththemostgulliblemoneyofall retailinvestorsandretirees ultimately

    payingtheprice.

    ThecracksinUDFsfacadearestartingtoappear. OnoraboutOctober30,2015,alawsuitwasfiledinTravis

    County,TexasnamingUDFIVasacodefendantinacaseinvolvingallegationsoffraud,breachofcontract,tortious

    interferenceandfraudulenttransfer. OnNovember24,2015,UMT,UDFIII,UDFIVandUDFVeachfiledForms8K

    revealingthattheirindependentregisteredpublicaccountingfirm,WhitleyPennLLP,declinedonNovember19,

    2015,tostandforreappointmentastheauditorforeachcompany. Onthesamedaythatitwasannouncedto

    publicshareholdersthatWhitleyPennhaddeclinedtostandforreappointment,WilliamKahane(whoappearsto

    beaffiliatedwithRCSCapital,ARCapitalandNicholasSchorsch)resignedfromUDFVsboard. OnNovember30,

    2015,UDFIIIfiledaninvoluntarybankruptcypetitionintheUnitedStatesBankruptcyCourtfortheWestern

    DistrictofTexasagainstUDFIIIandUDFIVssecondlargestnonaffiliatedborrower.OnDecember4,2015,the

    letterattachedwassenttoWhitleyPennconcerningitsauditworkandtheForms8KfiledonNovember24,2015.