Uconn j raney

24
Background Noise: Classroom, Background Noise: Classroom, Clinic and (Research) Lab Clinic and (Research) Lab Jill Raney, Ph.D. April 11, 2014 University of Connecticut

Transcript of Uconn j raney

Page 1: Uconn j raney

Background Noise: Classroom, Background Noise: Classroom, Clinic and (Research) LabClinic and (Research) Lab

Jill Raney, Ph.D.April 11, 2014

University of Connecticut

Page 2: Uconn j raney

OverviewOverviewPresence of background noise in

classrooms

Standards for Classroom Acoustics

Measuring impact of background noise

Interventions

What is current research telling us.

Page 3: Uconn j raney
Page 4: Uconn j raney

Distance (Speaker to the listener ) –Double the distance, decrease signal by 6 dB

Reverberation – Persistence of the reflected sounds after the original sound is produced. Longer time greater the difficulty.

Noise –Greater the background noise the poorer the Signal/Noise ratio (S/N)

Page 5: Uconn j raney
Page 6: Uconn j raney
Page 7: Uconn j raney

Classroom Acoustic StandardsClassroom Acoustic Standards2002 - American National Standards Institute (ANSI) created the, Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements and Guidelines for Schools standard (ANSI S12.60-2002). Standard developed in a effort to create a classroom environment that optimizes speech understanding.

2004 - American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's (ASHA) endorsed the ANSI standard and recommended the following criteria for classroom acoustics:

• Unoccupied classroom levels must not exceed 35 dBA

• The signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) should be at least +15 dB at the child's ears.

• Unoccupied classroom reverberation not longer than 0.6 seconds in smaller classrooms or 0.7 seconds in larger rooms

Page 8: Uconn j raney

ClinicClinicAuditory Skill Development: Speech understanding in background noise

Children are not “little adults”.

Page 9: Uconn j raney

Elliot, L. (1979). Performance of

children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of

speech intelligibility in noise using

sentence material with controlled word

predictability. Journal of the Acoustical

Society of America, 66, 651-653.

Page 10: Uconn j raney

Which children have difficulty Which children have difficulty understanding speech in understanding speech in background noise? Most!background noise? Most!

• Normal hearing• Hearing loss • Sensorineural• Conductive• Unilateral

• Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD)• Aspergers

Page 11: Uconn j raney

Some of the Available SIN TestsSome of the Available SIN Tests• Words-in-Noise Test (WIN) (Wilson, 2003;

Wilson & McArdle, 2007)

• Quick Speech-in-Noise Test (QuickSIN) (Killion et al., 2004)

• Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) (Nilsson et al., 1994)

• BKB-Speech in Noise Test (BKB-SIN) (Etymotic Research, 2005)

• Listening in Spatialized Noise - Sentences Test (LiSN-S) (NAL – National Acoustic Laboratories)

Page 12: Uconn j raney

Speech-In-Noise (SIN) Testing: Speech-In-Noise (SIN) Testing: Quantify the amount of difficulty. Quantify the amount of difficulty.

Stimuli: Digits Words

Sentences Noise: Speech-spectrum Cafeteria Multi-talker babble

Presentation: Modified Live-Voice (MLV) Recorded

Page 13: Uconn j raney

What can we do?What can we do?

Page 14: Uconn j raney

Improve the S/NImprove the S/N

•Decrease the level of the noise (N)

• Increase the level of the signal (S)

Page 15: Uconn j raney

FM - PhonakFM - Phonak

iSense

Inspiro

Page 16: Uconn j raney

Practice Practice

Page 17: Uconn j raney

Auditory Training ProgramsAuditory Training Programs

LACE - Listening And Communication Enhancement (Neurotone)

(LiSN-S)- Listening in Spatialized Noise – Sentences Test (National Acoustics Lab)

Page 18: Uconn j raney

Lab - Lab - Why is noise detrimental to speech Why is noise detrimental to speech understanding?understanding?

Page 19: Uconn j raney

Dr. Nina Kraus’ WorkDr. Nina Kraus’ Work

Audiology Online – From20Q with Gus Mueller (7/13)

Page 20: Uconn j raney

Marion Downs Lecture in Pediatric Marion Downs Lecture in Pediatric Audiology (AAA, 2014)Audiology (AAA, 2014)

“Biological Assessment in Audiology: “Biological Assessment in Audiology: Spotlight on Auditory Processing and Spotlight on Auditory Processing and Hearing in Noise.”Hearing in Noise.”

Presented by Dr. Nina KrausPresented by Dr. Nina Kraus

Page 21: Uconn j raney

Does FM Use and Training Work?Does FM Use and Training Work?

Page 22: Uconn j raney

SummarySummaryPresence of background noise in

classrooms

Standards for Classroom Acoustics

Measuring impact of background noise

Interventions

What is current research telling us.

Page 23: Uconn j raney

As Helen Keller said,

“Blindness separates us from things but deafness separates us from people."

Page 24: Uconn j raney

Thank you…