UC Online, Issue 3
-
Upload
university-and-college-union-ucu -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of UC Online, Issue 3
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
1/47
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
2/47
ONLINE PAGE 2
Help us tosupport you
THREE
Sally Hunt is
general secretary
of the University
and College Union.
She was re-elected
in March 2012
with 74% of the
votes cast. You can
read more abouther proposals
for change here
www.ucu.org.uk/
changeproposals
Unions have been pivotal in every fight for social justice: decent pay,
dignified retirement, a safe workplace and equality of opportunity are
what we stand for and what we have always stood for.
That is as true in our universities and colleges as anywhere. Last year,
the UCU took on 7,000 cases for individual members treated badly at
work and our fine record of winning redress for them, including financial
settlements, shows that we are a powerful and effective advocate for
staff.
In the past year alone, the UCU has used its collective power to try to
defend members pension rights, protect jobs and oppose cuts to our
sector and its staff.
Many historians consider the period from the 1950s to the 1970s to be
the golden age of trade unionism and say that our best years are behind
us. However, the need for trade unions is stronger now than it has been
for a generation. We have a real opportunity, but can we take it?
The challenge is to be as relevant in todays world as we were 30, 40 or
even 100 years ago. Because, despite our successes, past and present,
union membership overall remains too low and support within the
general population for our values is weak.As much as it hurts to say, in the eyes of many of those we need to
recruit, we can be seen as old-fashioned, and sometimes self-serving
and self-interested. We can say this is unfair and we can blame
politicians and the press as much as we like, but the truth is that unions,
including the UCU, need to be better at engaging with society as it is,
not as we would like it to be or as it may have been 40 years ago.
So how do we go about achieving this? The recent ballot of UCU
members on change delivered a clear mandate to the forthcoming UCU
Congress to transform our relationship with members and to give them
a greater say in how the union is run. I hope we take that opportunity.
THE GENERAL SECRETARY
moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
3/47
PAGE 3THREEONLINE
The changes I am proposing for the UCU are modest sounding but
important and, if the recent ballot is anything to go by, extremely
popular with members.
First, I propose to reduce the size of our National Executive Committee.
Our NEC is currently bigger than that of Unison, which has 10 times
as many members. What we need is to create a more effective,
representative body comparable in size to those of other unions.
The money saved more than 600,000 over my term of office will
be used to provide direct support for members and their representatives
at the coalface. This change was supported by 88.6% of members in the
recent ballot.
Second, I propose to give members a vote on any employer offer that the
majority of our negotiators believe to be final, before the union takesbig decisions about whether to accept, reject and take action. This can
be done quickly and cheaply using modern technology, and it puts our
members in the driving seat. This change was supported by 85.1% of
members in the recent ballot.
Third, I propose that we elect our lay national negotiators not from the
annual conference floor but from the members themselves using one-
member, one-vote. This change was supported by 82.1% of members in
the recent ballot.
I have heard it argued that these measures will weaken democracy
in the UCU but I, and those who voted, believe they will strengthen it.
Consulting members before we take action is what gives us legitimacy
in our struggles. Letting members decide who represents them at the
negotiating table makes us more accountable, not less. Investing in our
local activists, rather than in internal bureaucracy, will deliver a union
that is closer to its members.
Reform of the UCU is not about turning us towards the political Left or
Right. It is about turning us towards our members. That means using our
resources for the things members want us to fight on. It means choosing
our battles rather than fighting total war, as some have argued. And it
means using our brilliant staff to concentrate on supporting members,
running campaigns and building a credible alternative to the cuts,
rather than writing paper after paper for internal committees.
People will join unions if they see us standing up for them,they will stay with us if they see us listening to them and
they will become active if they think their voice counts..
Tofindoutmoreabout
thechangesincluding
yourbranchsresulti
ntheballotgoto
www.ucu.org
.uk/changeproposa
ls
R back to the top
Qback to contents
Qback
Qback to contents
http://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposalshttp://www.ucu.org.uk/changeproposals -
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
4/47
ONLINE PAGE 4
Heading
THREE
Breadth and depth:what is a university?
James Ladyman
is a Professor of
Philosophy at
the Universityof Bristol. His
expertise spans
from Philosophy
of science to
philosophy of
physics and
metaphysics
Universities as centres for teaching and research
in a broad range of disciplines have always existed
alongside more specialised institutions such
as colleges of law and the performing arts, and
institutes of one kind and another.
Without demeaning the latter it is important that we recognise the special
value of the former that inheres in their breadth. UCUs recent important
report about the reduction in courses in core subjects available over the
last few years should focus our minds on the need to articulate and defend
the conception of universities as broad-based centres of education and
scholarship. That the elimination of many single honours courses to which
the union has drawn attention has happened in advance of the present
governments disgraceful drive to commercialise higher education does
not augur well for the immediate future. There is a great danger that
universities will base decisions about what subjects they offer on the short-
term popularity of courses and so undermine our medium and long-term
national interest. Academic capacity is easily undermined but takes years
to develop, so disinvestment cannot easily be reversed especially when the
HIGHER EDUCATIONALAMY
moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
5/47
PAGE 5THREEONLINE
capacity in question is signicantly reduced at the national level.
To abet and reverse the current trend for universities to close courses
perceived to be insufciently important we must challenge the crass
instrumentalism that characterises contemporary debate about education
in general and higher education in particular. Instrumentalism need not
be crass because a proper appreciation of what universities contribute
to society need not be based on lofty ideals of education for its own sake.
On the contrary, even if all we care about it is the economy and equipping
students with the skills and wherewithal to take their place in it, we ought
still to recognise the importance of exposing them as whole to a good
portion of the full range of the traditional university curriculum. Our
national competitiveness in the global economy is not going to be based on
natural resources or cheap labour markets, so it can only be based on the
education of our population.
We cannot predict what exactly the future will require of us, but we do
know that education in traditional academic disciplines teaches people
how to think and how to learn making them adaptable and providing us
with a national insurance policy against future contingencies. Already,
European universities are seeking to capitalise on our disinvestment in
higher education and the uncertainties about our commitment to it by
offering English language degree programmes to recruit UK and foreign
students that would otherwise study in our universities. We spend a
smaller proportion of our GDP than any developed nation on higher
education; now is not the time to further undermine our universities by
reducing the range of degree programmes they offer, while other countries
are increasing their investment across the board.
Students who attend a university that offers a wide
range of subjects enjoy important benefits that donot derive from their own curricula.
Perhaps most important among these is that they are exposed to the rest
of culture by mixing with other students who are studying very different
things. In terms of the vulgar but ubiquitous contemporary idiom, part of
the student experience is conversing about the meaning of life, politics,
art, literature, history, science and religion with a range of people each
of whom brings their own disciplinary knowledge and sensibility to the
discussion. To deny future generations of students that experience unlessthey happen to be at one of the handful of elite institutions that remain
universities in the full sense of the word will be to impoverish them and
morePQback
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
6/47
PAGE 6THREEONLINE
thereby further to atomise and diminish our culture as a whole.
The internet is reducing our exposure to ideas and values that are not
already our own as search engines lter content based on our habits
and interests, and as on-line communities enable people with highly
idiosyncratic cultural identities to ensure they only mix with others like
themselves. Universities are an indispensable counter-balance to this
trend but only to the extent that they continue to offer a wide range of
courses. It is important to note that it is not only the arts and humanities
that are under threat but subjects such as biology and chemistry; while
universities rush to offer the latest new subjects such as nanotechnology
or bio-engineering they must ensure that the foundations of science in the
basic core disciplines are secure.
There is no list of subjects that must be represented in a university for it tocount as one. However, as the number and range of disciplines is reduced
the intellectual culture and context of those that remain is impoverished.
Eliminate enough of them and nothing worthy of the name university
remains. There have always been institutions such as Imperial College
that have specialised and not hosted a full range of subjects. However, they
have hitherto been exceptions to the general rule and exist in cities where
other universities ll the gaps they leave.
As nancial pressures on universities grow and as their leadersincreasingly think in terms of the bottom line and commercial and market
values, we face the prospect of whole regions in which fundamental
academic subjects cannot be studied. This is a dire threat to our economy
and our intellectual culture, and we must recognise that the former
depends on the latter as a whole and not just on those subjects that are
presently in vogue.
^UCcontributors welcome the chance to discuss their work. Responses to thisarticle should be sent to [email protected]
R back to the top
www.ucu.org.ukonline here
Qback
Qback to contents
http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/ -
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
7/47
ONLINE PAGE 7THREE
First they came forthe libraries . . .
Ian Nash
is a partner in
Nash & Jones
Partnership ofjournalists and
media consultants
and formerly
Assistant Editor of
the TESwhere he
created FE Focus
If you really wanted to promote lifelong learning
throughout a community, would you start by axing
half your local authoritys librarians?
Richmond upon Thames council may not be alone in deciding to do this,
but the chop-logic of its combined post-16 education policies still has the
population fuming.
Coincidentally, the 25m saved is exactly what they need to allow ve
schools to open sixth forms in a borough with one of the more successful
FE colleges, an adult education college and no surplus demand for such
places. Furthermore, librarians in the borough have until now been
playing a particularly strong role in supporting schools and colleges in
both formal and informal adult learning.
The local authority says it has no choice because schools could get their
way, in any case, by quitting and joining the free-for-all dash for academy
and free school status, even though the sixth forms will be too small to
be viable from the outset. So we can see the monumental mess looming,
not only for FE colleges but the eventual erosion of A-level choice for
sixth-formers hoping for university. Or can we? Off the record, council
ofcials admit that a head start in this race would allow schools to raid
neighbouring borough catchment areas. And, if the schools take students
from the colleges, so what?
Move east across the capital to Newham and you have an even more
bizarre arrangement whereby a group of exclusive private schools
including Eton is opening a state-supported sixth form, to compete with
an already exemplary sixth form college (NewVIc), FE college and ve
thriving sixth forms. When asked by the media to justify the move, the
new head Richard Cairns replied: All were doing is providing a choice.
But this is simply not true or necessary, Eddie Playfair, principal of
NewVIc, insists. In a recent letter to the Guardian, having analysed the
COMMENT
moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
8/47
PAGE 8THREEONLINE
demographics, he said: This project is far from being a response to genuine
local need. In fact it risks dissipating scarce funding and segregating
young people. It may suit its advocates to ignore the facts and promote
themselves as sponsors of social mobility, but their track record so far is
the precise opposite.
All this arises from the Coalition Government granting new freedoms.
Ministers claim to be tackling disadvantage by freeing institutions to
follow the market, but that is not how increasingly beleaguered further
education staff and managers I have spoken to see it. They watch with
alarm as the likes of former Express Journalist Toby Young and the head
teacher Katherine Birbalsingh darling of the 2010 Tory party conference
where she chose to rubbish her comprehensive school both plan new
academically elitist schools where there will be no skills teaching under the
age of 16.
So what is the solution?
To an increasing extent there is an attitude of If you cant beat them, join
them. And so we see Barneld college pushing to become the rst FE
college for prot and pleasure, Birmingham Metropolitan and Stockport
are talking about going mutual, and all colleges are talking to one another
about shared services agreements. Then there is the Gazelle group ofcolleges out to promote entrepreneurship grazing in the wide open spaces
of the savannah that is FE as Dan Taubman, senior national education
ofcial for the UCU described it to me. Also, we have Ofsted chief Michael
Wilshire positively encouraging colleges to reach out forget the depleted
resources and sponsor academies.
But havent we been here before? Many will recall with horror the
enterprising zeal of the 1990s an earlier age of austerity and cuts
described as efciency savings that went rotten. Then, I was FE Editoron the TES and remember Further Education Funding Council Chief
Executive, William Stubbs, berating me for failing to report on the genius
of entrepreneurial colleges, which he named: Halton, Bilston, Clarendon,
Stoke-on-Trent etc. Ministerial condence that nothing could or would go
wrong in any of these establishments was equally unwavering.
But when the press did report on them it was for entirely different reasons
either they were reckoned to have failed spectacularly, as with Derby
Wilmorton and Bilston, or were victims of malpractice and inadequategovernance and leadership. Whistleblowers from within Natfhe were
invariably the medias sources of intelligence, while ministers continued in
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
9/47
PAGE 9THREEONLINE
a state of denial. Inquiries by luminaries, such as Shattock on Wilmorton
and Nolan on ethics ensued, resulting in the red tape and constraints
which the government is now dismantling.
Bilston is probably the closest to an example of what is emerging now,
with the college spanning all sorts of mini colleges, often based on good
intentions located in and often run by local communities Big Society-style.
In the end, however, it was one of a group of rogue colleges accused of
defrauding the government of millions by misusing educational funds, a
claim that is contested by some to this day.
With new structures, new governance and new
partnerships being promoted, following BISs
tearing up of the model instruments and articlesof governance, who is to say history will not repeat
itself?
Already, we have seen how easily funding freedoms around
Apprenticeships have been exploited, as reported recently on the BBC
Panorama show The Great Apprenticeship Scandal, which found
upwards of 250m wasted last year.
Having followed this throughout very closely, I reckon none of this wouldhave been exposed or at least not until much worse damage had been
done were it not for the dogged persistence of Nick Linford, Managing
Editor of the new brash player in the education mediaFE Week. His
accusations and claims of misuse, waste of funds and short 12-week
training programmes masquerading as Apprenticeships were repeatedly
rejected at press conferences by Simon Waugh, Chief Executive of the
National Apprenticeship Service, who stood down last month. He insisted
NAS was monitoring and assuring quality. But evidence mounted and
Opposition MPs, notably Gordon Marsden, railed against them until the
FE and Skills Minister John Hayes took action.
But that was not before he announced a record 440,000 learners starting
an apprenticeship in 2010-11 a gure that surely must be radically
revised downwards in the light of the evidence. Can training schemes
such as those at Morrisons supermarket, which has enrolled 40 per cent
of its workforce on an apprenticeship with the private training provider
Elmeld Training, really be deemed full Apprenticeships? What does this
do to the brand image? And is it ethical that Mr Gerard Syddall, Elmelds
director, should take a 3m dividend from a budget that came wholly from
the SFA?
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
10/47
PAGE 10THREEONLINE
And it was not until the eve of the Panorama programme that Hayes
announced that from now on all apprenticeships must be at least 12
months duration nine months after the Skills Funding Agency had
promised a crackdown on fraud and misuse of public money in the FE and
skills sector, while admitting it was likely to get worse under governments
new sub-contracting arrangements. The extent of the concern was
revealed in communications, leaked toFE Weekbetween Geoff Russell,
chief executive of the SFA, and Hayes. 11m had been lost to fraud or
misuse in 2010-11 of which only 3m was accounted for. Police were
involved in nine investigations, said the letter which revealed that the
agency was pursuing 88 new allegations - a record high.
The real irony is that were the same rules and regulations that grew
under Shattock, Nolan and the rest still in place, cowboy operations,
exploitation, dead weight funding and excessive dividends from
Apprenticeship schemes would be subject to ethical inquiries and in some
cases deemed corrupt. What started under Labour as Train to Gain, where
employers were rewarded for staff skills training they should have paid for
themselves, continued under the Coalition in the guise of Apprenticeships.
Someone has to intervene and make sense of the disparate conicting
strands of education training policy before it is too late. This is a view
emerging from the Parliamentary Skills Group, which I addressed at a
recent seminar where concerns were expressed over the lack of joined
up government. This is exemplied locally by Richmond upon Thamess
policies on cuts and nationally by a lack of synergy or coherence between
DFE and BIS to the point where, to quote one speaker at the seminar,
policies may cut against each other with unintended and damaging
consequences.
This seems to be increasingly the state of affairs between schools and FE
where, if we are not careful, we will have an ultimately destructive free
for all with the notion of Winner take all which will not include the most
disadvantaged.
^UCcontributors welcome the chance to discuss their work. Responses to thisarticle should be sent to [email protected]
R back to the top
www.ucu.org.ukonline here
Qback
Qback to contents
http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/ -
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
11/47
ONLINE PAGE 11
Heading
THREE
Todays student:customer, investor,
learner?Rachel Williams
is an education
and social affairs
writer, who writes
regularly for the
Guardian.
A press release landed in my inbox this week with a
typically ambiguous headline.
STUDENTS 1 0 UNIVERSITIES it read. Sounds a bit antagonistic,
I thought, clicking on open. It turned out to refer to a piece of research
conducted by a graduate recruitment service, which had found that 46%of the 596 students it had quizzed felt their university was overrated. The
poll, the agency opined, served as a timely reminder to universities that
failing to deliver on the promise is all too easy at the point when the new
funding regime is making competition for students a key consideration.
Im constantly struck, when writing about higher education, by how
entirely alien the university experience feels compared to when I was there
in the late 1990s. Over the last year Ive increasingly felt that that disparity
is about to get even starker, and, of all the differences, this, perhaps, is themost fundamental: the sense of the student not just as a learner, but as a
customer, not just a young person on the next stage of their education, but
THE STUDENT EXPERIENCEALAMY
ALAMY
moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
12/47
PAGE 12THREEONLINE
an investor, surveying the market, deciding how much theyre willing to
stake, and naturally expecting a decent return.
That return, of course, is not intellectual agility for its own sake, but
employability. When KMPG surveyed 1,000 students, school leavers and
parents recently, 68% said that the most important thing about going to
university was getting a qualication that led to a well-paid job. Just 12%
went for the apparently embarrassingly anachronistic ideal of getting a
rounded education.
The gulf with my own experience is hardly surprising: I started university
in the last year before tuition fees were introduced. But as a wannabe
journalist, thinking and writing about them quickly became part of my
life, and has remained so ever since; melodically-challenged chants of
education is a right, not a privilege feel like the recurring soundtrack tomy reporting career.
Those early stories feel rather quaint these days. RIP Higher Education
October 98 reads the banner pictured hanging from a college window
alongside my account of the protest billed by the student paper as
Oxfords last stand against fees in May that year. (It was a really damn
noisy march, was the curiously underwhelming conclusion of the student
union president on this supposedly momentous occasion).
In the rst week of the autumn term, when the 1,000 fees (imagine, just1,000!) came into force and in the same issue a feature about mobile
phones boldly declared everyone knows someone whos got one the
story was the possibility of freshers planning to withhold payment of their
fees in protest.
By spring four rebels were still standing firm,
bringing the university an unexpected reputation
for radicalism, but by Easter the student bodys
enthusiasm for their cause had all but fizzled out.
By now editor of the paper, I wrote an editorial commenting on all ill-
attended picket that warned, with all the sparkling insight of a sleep-
deprived 20-year-old: The tuition fee issue does need to be kept alive,
because even if it seems acceptable to some people now, it will escalate.
Thirteen years later, with most would-be students now facing a bill of
9,000 a year, I am still asking the same questions about what fees willmean for who gets a university education, and how they go about it.
Whenever Ive spoken to prospective students in the last year, the same
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
13/47
PAGE 13THREEONLINE
theme has recurred: a hope the course they choose turns out to be worth
the money.
Higher fees wont necessarily put them off theyre smart enough to
understand that its not an upfront cost but they are at great pains to
make sure that when theyre paying back that gargantuan loan, theyre
doing it as quickly as possible, and in a job it was worth taking on such
debt for.
Recently I was trying to nd out if school leavers from disadvantaged
backgrounds were taking into account what kind of nancial help
discounts on fees or cash bursaries different universities offered as they
made their applications. In fact, it turned out that at that stage they were
much more focused on choosing a degree that would pay dividends. If the
course is good it should lead to me getting a really good job, so the moneyIm taking out now shouldnt be an issue, was a typical comment. They
might consider variables like nancial support further down the line, they
conceded, but even then the message was clear: employability is all.
Of course students should have high expectations of university; of
course they should be well-taught and feel their teachers are interested
in their progress; and of course having a degree should improve their
career chances. None of this means I dont have the greatest respect for
institutions striving to make sure their students get what they pay for.
But educating someone is not the same as helping
them get a job.
How will university life change if the relationship between student and
academic morphs into one between client and employee, and learners
assess the curriculum with one eye on how relevant it will be when they
go job-hunting? Will more of those who arent getting the grades they
think they deserve be inclined to complain its because theyre not being
taught properly? What about arts and humanities, already battered by the
removal of funding for teaching?
The subjects that held up best in applications for the rst year under the
new fees regime were those tending to lead to lucrative careers: medicine,
maths, sciences, engineering, law.
Are the subjects traditionally most closely associated with learning for
learnings sake doomed to become the become the preserve of mainlymiddle class students at elite institutions?
I believe students will suffer under this pressure too. Its a terrible
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
14/47
PAGE 14THREEONLINE
responsibility, at the age of 17 or 18, to decide what you want from your
degree studies, to pick exactly the right course, and do everything perfectly
when you get there. Presumably if youre paying 27 grand for a university
education, youre far less likely than previous generations to squander
your time on booze and soft drugs before getting kicked out half-way
through and thats no bad thing in my book. Just because education is a
right, not a privilege, doesnt mean you should be blas about it.
But there are plenty of other reasons why university doesnt work out
for some students on the rst go: the wrong course, the wrong halls, the
wrong people, not to mention all the practical and emotional challenges of
your rst experience of independent living and studying. It hardly seems
the fairest time to expect them not to make mistakes. And I cant imagine
turning up in freshers week, gritting your teeth and thinking it had better
be worth it, is much fun.
How cruel too that this era of suffocating compulsion to make your degree
pay should coincide with some of the worst ever prospects for getting
a job in the nal quarter of 2011 one in every ve new graduates was
unemployed and the increasing necessity of doing unpaid work before
you are even considered worthy of being rewarded for your efforts.
When I was at university the dreaded internshipwas barely heard of, something reserved only
for the most chillingly ambitious of would-be
management consultants.
Journalism has long been a career where work experience is key. But in
my era that meant a fortnight on a local paper in any town or city where
you had relatives, in the holidays, not three months subsisting on travel
expenses alone in the heart of London, if youre lucky enough to be able to
live there rent-free.
I read a suggestion recently that any graduates looking for work should be
using Twitter to sell themselves, and felt a real pang of sympathy.
One minute were warning them not to jeopardise their future prospects by
posting ill-advised party pics on Facebook, the next were expecting them
to be masters of social media manipulation.
Naturally the pressure is on careers services too to beef up their offerings
and with them their institutions performance in the employability leaguetables. While 82% of the KMPG survey respondents were happy with the
teaching they were getting, only 48% were satised with the careers advice
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
15/47
PAGE 15THREEONLINE
on offer. More and more are services offering specialised training in key
job-bagging skills like networking. But it is still academics wholl be in the
spotlight if particular options cant deliver the real-world returns students
expect, especially when, under the governments proposals to make
universities more accountable to students than ever before, universities
have to put employment and salaries data for all undergraduate courses on
their websites.
Im sure the writer of the STUDENTS 1 0 UNIVERSITIES headline
was only being playful, looking for a teaser that would catch the readers
eye. But to me it brought home perhaps the most toxic effect of the
marketisation of higher education: the pitting of students and teachers
against one another. I cant believe that creates the kind of nurturing
environment in which young minds ourish.
^UCcontributors welcome the chance to discuss their work. Responses to thisarticle should be sent to [email protected]
R back to the top
www.ucu.org.ukonline here
Qback
Qback to contents
http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/ -
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
16/47
ONLINE PAGE 16THREE
After IfL, what nextfor professionaldevelopment?
Barry Lovejoy
is UCUs National
Head of Further
Education
The decision taken by an independent panel to end
compulsory membership of the much malignedInstitute for Learning (IfL) was a comprehensive
victory for the University and College Union (UCU)
members who orchestrated and maintained a
boycott of the organisation.
The boycott, coupled with UCUs threat of legal action if IfL or the
employers attempted to persecute anybody withholding payment, forced
the government to announce an independent review into professionalismin further education in England.
FURTHER EDUCATION
Youcanreadmoreabo
uttheIFLissue
andtheindependentreview
here
www.ucu.org.uk/ifl
fee
IMAGEPHILIPWOLMUTH
moreP
Qback to contents
http://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfeehttp://www.ucu.org.uk/iflfee -
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
17/47
PAGE 17THREEONLINE
The deep felt anger at the imposition of a mandatory fee for IfL
membership reected the growing frustration towards an organisation
that had lost its way and was largely irrelevant to lecturers just wanting
to do a good job. It was also a conduit to express opposition to ever-
increasing workloads and demands.
Criticisms of IfL have been a consistent feature of UCU annual congress
motions since 2008 and that attempt to impose a fee for the privilege of
enduring such a mediocre set-up was the straw that nally broke camels
back.
The successful boycott was an example of UCU responding to a grassroots
issue. The member-led campaign successfully utilised the unions
resources at a national level including lobbying, press work, petitions,
industrial action, legal challenges, negotiations and ongoing consultationand involvement of members.
So how did it go so wrong?
How did IfL go from being a professional body that most people in the
sector had been asking for over many years to one which managed to unite
lecturers and their employers in calling for its abolition?
UCU had warned in 2010 that the majority of staff saw little value in
its services, with a survey showing 84% saying they would not pay any
sort of fee on principle. Yet the opposition to the fee seemed to take IfL
completely by surprise.
Others in the sector were less shocked that compelling staff, already
suffering pay cuts and increases in pension contributions, to pay to join a
body few had much condence in was not going to be a popular move. The
fact IfL could not see this was an indication for many of just how out of
touch it was with staff concerns and problems.However, there are other reasons too. Performing the role of regulator
and acting as a voice for the profession was always going to be difcult
to achieve. Being the body which could nd its members guilty of
professional misconduct, and potentially deprive them of their livelihood,
sat uncomfortably with it also being their advocate.
IfL didnt stand up to ministers when it was announced that the
government wouldnt nancially support IfL anymore. During the
period of moving to being self-nancing, IfL largely refused to criticisegovernment initiatives, at a time when the sector and its staff needed all
the support they could get.
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
18/47
PAGE 18THREEONLINE
The tone used in IfLs communications was always to look on the bright
side and support the government and its policies. They didnt ever reect
the anger and pain its members and the members of UCU and other
unions were experiencing in terms of harsher management, especially
around lesson observations and losses in jobs and provision.
Part of the reason for these failures was its governance processes which
left real decision making to a small leadership group, often ignoring what
its own Advisory Council suggested. In the end IfL made the fatal mistake
of believing its own propaganda that everyone in the sector loved and
wanted it.
As we move on from the IfL debacle it is important
to note that throughout the campaign UCU hasalways been acutely aware of the need to avoid
throwing the baby out with the bath water.
The issue around professionalism in the sector was not put to bed in the
panels report, which was merely an interim report dealing with the IfL
issue.
UCU, like others involved in FE, want the best teachers in our colleges
delivering high-quality education with appropriate qualications and
access to further training and personal development. We are looking
forward to contributing to the wider review of professionalism of further
education, where we will continue to make these points.
While the review leans (not surprisingly from this government) towards
the need for less regulation, UCU does not support a deregulated sector.
Employers in the sector both colleges and private and voluntary
institutions have been found wanting in providing consistent and high
quality support and resources for professional development.If not through government regulations, then it is vital that clear
obligations are placed on employers through funding requirements and
the Learning and Skills Improvement Service must be given adequate
funds to meet those challenges.
Our next job will be to take this forward in the next stage of the review and
to ensure that employers meet their CPD obligations.
UCcontributors welcome the chance to discuss their work. Responses to this
article should be sent to [email protected]
R back to the top
www.ucu.org.ukonline here
Qback
Qback to contents
http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/ -
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
19/47
ONLINE PAGE 19THREE
Mary Senior
is the UCU Scotland
Lead Ofcial and
Tony Axonis
Policy Ofcer
University Governance:will Scotlandlead the way?
UCU Scotland is campaigning for the full
implementation of the recommendations froma report on governance which will increase
involvement of staff and students. It also urged
MSPs to support reform of management in Scottish
universities prior to an evidence session in the
Scottish Parliament on the report.
The Review of Higher Education Governance was instigated by Michael
Russell, the Cabinet Secretary for Education partly in response to UCU
concerns over crisiss in university governance and management that has
led to a series of disputes across Scotland. The ve man panel, including
Terry Brotherstone, a former UCU Scotland President, as the STUC
nominee, was given the remit to produce a report on governance reform.
UCU Scotland welcomed the report, which was published in February via
a statement to the Scottish Parliament during which the Cabinet Secretary
whilst welcoming it, stated that the proposals would now be subject to
consultation with the sector.
f The recommendations are intended to increase the democracy and
transparency of governance and university management and in
particular calls for:
fProtection of academic freedom and institutional autonomy
fThe appointment of two nominees of both students and staff unions to
the governing body and committees
fGreater transparency in appointments and remuneration of seniormanagement
fElection for chairs of governing bodies
HIGHER EDUCATION
moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
20/47
PAGE 20THREEONLINE
fA broadening of the experience of governing body members and greater
transparency in appointment procedures
fAn evidence base on higher education in Scotland is built up to inform
further reform
Press coverage has tended to focus on the opinions of interested partiesresponding to particular proposals that are easier to criticise in isolation
than when considered as part of a well-made, historically literate
argument.
Principals have questioned the need for change given Scotlands relative
success in league tables. They have given particular weight to the
dissenting letter submitted to the Cabinet Secretary separately from the
Report by panel-member Alan Simpson, chair of court at the University of
Stirling who dissents from the view that chairs should be elected or unions
included in governance procedures.
However, Scotlands ancient universities (and Dundee) already have a
system of electing Rectors, usually designated the chair of the governing
body. This is an important part of the distinctiveness of Scotlands higher
education tradition examined along with other important historical
factors in the Reports introduction. The idea is simply that a Scottish
solution to the problems of university governance in the rapidly changing
world of higher education should include an enhanced role for the Rector
(or otherwise designated elected chair) who will be able to claim authority
from the university community as a whole and ensure that all relevant
internal and external interests are given due attention in the institutional
decision-making process.
Further most governing bodies have reserved places for support-staff
unions as well as the informal inclusion of academic staff unions through
the senate or academic board. Hence neither of these proposals are alien
to Scottish institutions.
UCU is joining with NUS to push for greater democracy and transparency
in the governing bodies including decisions on Principals pay and gained
support from the Minister at UCU Scotland congress.
^UCcontributors welcome the chance to discuss their work. Responses to thisarticle should be sent to [email protected]
R back to the top
www.ucu.org.ukonline here
Qback
Qback to contents
http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/ -
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
21/47
ONLINE PAGE 21
Heading
THREE
Jan Murray is a
freelance writer and
regular contributor
to The Guardian.
Rhian Jones washer apprentice and
is now a successful
writer in her own
right.
This time last year, I felt like Id reached a career
crossroads. After a decade as a freelance education
journalist, which had definitely been more feast
than famine, I had this nagging feeling that Ineeded a new challenge.
Expanding my business was the obvious answer; despite employing a part-
time administrative assistant, and paying contractors to do transcription
and research, I was still putting in far too many late nights and early
mornings. And I was regularly turning down work something no
freelancer ever wants to do.
Hire an intern, friends told me. A bright, enthusiastic graduate, intenton a career in journalism, who would take on some of my workload for a
few months in exchange for a Travelcard, free sarnies and a few tips of the
trade.
But it wasnt an idea that sat comfortably with me. A trainee journalist
needs to be an accurate writer, have good research skills and plenty of
initiative and determination things that are not necessarily learned in a
lecture theatre. And taking on a graduate intern without making a decent
stab of training them up on the job just seemed exploitative to me.
So I decided to hire an apprentice. While they were helping me out with
transcription and story research, I could give them hands on experience in
Jan Murray (right) with Rhian Jones
THE APPRENTICE
moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
22/47
PAGE 22THREEONLINE
how to think and write like a journalist.
The rst challenge was nding an appropriate course. Much to my
surprise, I found there was no apprenticeship curriculum or framework
for journalism a trade in which employers traditionally grew their own
staff, on the job, using apprenticeships and other kinds of traineeships.
And while it conrmed something I already suspected about journalism
(that it has largely become a graduate or even postgraduate entry
occupation), I was even more shocked to learn that in a time of heavy
government investment in apprenticeships (around 3bn last year
alone), there were no rm plans to introduce a vocational route into the
profession.
Like many freelance journalists, I have a portfolio-style career, which includes writing for national
newspapers, copywriting, training and even
organising events and conferences.
Harlow College, which had already trained the rst MPs apprentice,
suggested my apprentice could follow the Business Administration
framework which includes optional modules on audio transcription,
analysing and reporting data and designing and producing business
documents and it proved to be a perfect t. Being able to draw on the
colleges expertise in teaching journalism (Harlow has an impressive list
of alumni that includes Piers Morgan, Jeremy Clarkson and the Guardian
editor Alan Rusbridger) was an added bonus.
Following a national search, over 20 candidates were shortlisted for 30
hour a week role (including a day at college) at a rate of 6.08 an hour.
And after a gruelling two-day assessment, which included tests in writing,
spelling and current affairs, as well as a formal interview, the job went to22-year-old Rhian Jones.
Having left school at 17, and spent four years working in shops, bars and
call centres, she had everything I was looking for drive, determination
and good interpersonal skills which (despite completing a year of a
degree in English and media), Im convinced she didnt learn in a seminar
room.
I spent four years teaching English in secondary schools and now lecture
in journalism at a number of universities. But I quickly realised thatclassroom based teaching is a very different proposition to training
someone on the job, in a real work situation. And it didnt take me long to
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
23/47
PAGE 23THREEONLINE
decide which method is more satisfying.
In a classroom environment, motivating even the most enthusiastic
journalism students to nd compelling stories and fascinating people to
interview can be tough. Encouraging them to respond to feedback, and use
it to improve their work, can also be a challenge hardly surprising, given
the fact it is only likely to be read by a handful of university lecturers.
Give a student a real task, where they can see the results of their efforts
in a newspaper, magazine or even in a leaet or brochure and you see
interest, enthusiasm and a determination to improve. Few things are
more motivating than knowing that if your work isnt up to scratch you
will have to do a rewrite or worse still your lovingly crafted article may
not be published at all. These are tough lessons to learn and are not for the
faint-hearted, but neither is journalism.This is not to say classroom-based teaching doesnt have value, or that
universities dont give students opportunities to get hands-on experience.
But it is patchy: only a handful of universities facilitate really top-notch
student journalism. And higher education institutions offering students
access to high-quality work-based learning are still the exception rather
than the norm.
Sadly, this is symptomatic of wider failings in theeducation system.
Young people are being educated in an increasingly narrow system that
teaches them how to jump through hoops to pass exams. While I believe
there is a place for learning for learnings sake, this must be balanced with
helping young people acquire knowledge and skills that will prove useful
in the workplace.
Id love to see some of the big newspapers publishing houses being boldenough to grow their own talent rather than cherry-picking the top
graduates as they do now. Training an apprentice is time consuming,
but the benets of one-to-one to tuition, in a real work environment, are
invaluable.
After six months with me (and three months earlier than planned) my
apprentice is leaving me to take up a position as editorial assistant/junior
reporter on the trade industry magazineMusic Week proof, if ever it
was needed, that what do you can do is far more important than what youknow.
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
24/47
PAGE 24THREEONLINE
Youre hired . . .by Rhian Jones
Before starting my journalism apprenticeship, its fair to say Id had a
few stabs at education. After leaving school I tried my hand at a BTECMusic Practice course, home A levels, an Access to HE Diploma and
university. But instead of helping me grow, each stint left me feeling like
I knew nothing about what I was good at.
After spending six months being mentored while learning on-the-
job, I feel like I nally know my strengths. As well as developing my
journalistic skills, Ive gained so much on a personal level from the
whole experience. Ive learnt that my past failures in education havent
been because Im stupid, not good enough or a failure. They didnt workfor me because I wasnt learning the right thing or wasnt been taught in
the way I learn best.
After my rst year at university, Id sat in a few lecture halls, submitted a
couple of assignments and had more spare time than I knew what to do
with. Yet the year felt like a constant struggle.
Within a few weeks of starting my apprenticeship, I was running around
an exhibition hall at a conference, hunting for stories, interviewing and
writing case studies for a copywriting project, calling people for quotes
(including the heads secretary at a top public school, who didnt sound
pleased to hear from me), as well as managing one hundred and fty
freedom of information requests (amongst many, many other things).
Over the past six months, Ive rarely had time to think and yet its been
the easiest learning process of my life, because Im learning the way I
learn best.
The apprenticeship qualication has given me a good grounding of
transferable knowledge which I know will help me in my working life.
The individual attention I got from the one-to-one feedback really made
me feel valued, and as a result, my condence and self belief has grown.
The biggest incentive to produce my best work was the idea that it could
be printed in national newspapers, so getting a byline held far more
weight than submitting an essay to be graded objectively by one person,
with little regard for my writing skills or creativity.
But before stumbling upon vocational qualications, I had an idealisticview of academic education. I couldnt wait to be regarded as clever
with my BA Hons certicate proudly framed. When I tried it and
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
25/47
PAGE 25THREEONLINE
discovered that it wasnt for me, I felt completely lost. Thankfully I
was saved by my dream apprenticeship, but those once in a lifetime
opportunities are few and far between.
So what about those young people who dont ever get a chance to nd out
their strengths? The one thing Ive taken from my extensive experienceof education is that one size does not t all. Sometimes youve got to try
out a few things before nding what works for you.
^UCcontributors welcome the chance to discuss their work. Responses to thisarticle should be sent to [email protected]
R back to the top
www.ucu.org.ukonline here
Qback
Qback to contents
http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/ -
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
26/47
ONLINE PAGE 26THREE
Redemption througheducation:the case forlearning in prison
Graeme
Maudsley
is a Prison
Educator andmember of UCUs
National Executive
Committee
Prison education is facing challenging times.
As well as the ongoing controversy surrounding A4e (the beleaguered
welfare-to work company who despite being investigated for fraud are stillthe preferred bidder for 30m prison education contracts in London and
the East in England) the very nature of what we do is being re-dened.
Colleges and other providers have been
instructed by the governments offender
learning agency OLASS to make offenders
more employable if they want to keep hold
of their contracts.
On the face of it this seems like a reasonable
call. Employability is important but it is not
the be all and end all. An effective balance is
required that also fulls well the social and
personal developmental needs of offenders
and prepares them to reintegrate into
society.
Whilst the new skills agenda attempts to address this, the overridingemphasis on employability may reveal limited opportunities for success.
In times of economic hardship and with youth unemployment gures
alone spiralling to one million, we must question the validity of a
strategy that places so much emphasis on a single strand and a funding
methodology that encourages colleges and private providers to crank up
the churn in the pursuit of turning a coin.
Statistics reveal that prison is the preserve of the young, often uneducated
offender and to be successful in their rehabilitation we must seekto educate in the round. Perhaps the greatest impact on effective
resettlement is not just how employable an offender is as they go through
PRISON EDUCATION
PHOTO: ALAMY
moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
27/47
PAGE 27THREEONLINE
the gate. We must not forget they will compete in a saturated job market
with the hindrance of a criminal record, and this will de-motivate. For
many it will break them despite often the best of intentions at the time of
release. For these people it is the depth of knowledge and understanding of
the situation, being equipped with the tools to react to the knockbacks, the
difculties and the hardships that will likely confront them upon release.
This will dene above all else, the chances of that individual resisting a
return to offending.
Some prisoners will of course gain employment on release and this
for them will be the key to their rehabilitation but for the many who do
not it is the understanding, recognition and indeed enlightenment that
comes from a full and rounded education delivered with the compassion,
experience and professionalism of experienced educators that will deliver
results. We must strive to redress the balance accordingly.
Compounding the difculties we face is the ever tumultuous and cyclical
round of re-tender after re-tender. The creep of privatised companies
entering and showing interest in offender learning is worrying and again
represents a threat to the quality of education on offer. With low wages
touted and prevalence for ripping up professional terms and conditions,
awarding contracts to these providers is short-sighted and in the case of
A4e, embarrassing to the sector.
There are pockets of excellence in offender
learning and these pockets reflect areas wherein
internal stability has been maintained despite this
cyclical process.
These are the establishments where staff are embedded and settled, they
are often nancially secure, undertaking the job for the love of it, for the
difference they make, rather than the contractual rewards. They know how
to teach and they know how to address offending behaviour and despite
consistent change enforced upon them they manage to resist enough to
maintain the core of what they do.
Management are left with the task of picking up their good work,
re-badging it and making it t the present model. These people are
professional, seasoned educators and we need more of their ilk; we need
more to be trained in their sphere of inuence. New blood is entering the
profession and whilst this is welcome it is likely staff turnover will increase
dramatically with new entrants having little understanding of what
really works. Frequently they are given inferior contracts to mainstream
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
28/47
PAGE 28THREEONLINE
colleagues and less effective mentoring as their seasoned predecessors
retire. They will be more inclined to unquestioningly tow the party line and
true success will decline as a result.
To establish what works we must be looking to these pockets of historical
excellence before they become too diluted by emerging excellence as
dened under more recent measures of success. If you look you will nd an
effective and complete education is the common theme.
For much of offender learning however it is true to say that improvement
is required and it is no wonder that OFSTED have noted room for
improvement in many establishments around the country when every
three to ve years we are again torn from our roots and thrown headlong
into the instability and uncertainty of changes in funding methodology,
strategic direction and often employer.Having been through this process a number of times I can tell you that in
year one following a change in employer little changes, management are
focussed on laying the strategic path and contending with the operational
difculties offender learning presents. In year two we feel the impact on
the ground and the tendency is to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Existing systems, policies and quality procedures that are nely tuned to
meet the requirements of OLASS in that specic environment, are binned
by the ream and replaced with similar non-OLASS friendly documents.In year three we start to get to grips with the revised documentation and
start to make it work. At this point we are re-tendered and the process
repeats. It is unsurprising this approach is of limited success.
Stability is the key; offender learning is best placed rmly in the hands
of the public sector. It must be funded well and the constant cycle of re-
tendering must stop. The best teachers should be sought to work within its
connes and we should be charged with providing prisoners with a well-
rounded and balanced education. Until we reach common consensus that
this is the way to maximise a reduction in re-offending, we will continue on
the treadmill.
I am pleased our general secretary has repeatedly stated her belief that
we do need the very best teachers in OLASS and we must seek a strategy
to ensure terms and conditions are conducive to this. Only through
retaining and attracting the calibre of staff capable of turning around the
most disaffected in our society, will we realise true success.
^UCcontributors welcome the chance to discuss their work. Responses to thisarticle should be sent to [email protected]
R back to the top
www.ucu.org.ukonline here
Qback
Qback to contents
http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/ -
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
29/47
ONLINE PAGE 29
Heading
THREE
Freedom to choose?
Stephen Courtis UCUs senior
research ofcer
The total number of full-time undergraduate
courses offered by UK universities and colleges has
fallen by more than a quarter since 2006 as funding
cuts and increases in tuition fees hit higher
education.And analysis of a sample of single-subject degree courses showed a 14%
cut since 2006, although the number rose slightly in 2012
Sir Richard Roberts, chief scientic ofcer at the New England Biolabs
and Nobel Laureate for Medicine or Physiology, said in a report published
in February by UCU, Choice cuts How choice has declined in higher
education: The decisions currently being undertaken by many universities
and encouraged by the British government seem completely contrary
to the idea of providing a broad and balanced education for university
students.
HIGHER EDUCATION
Advisor helps a student complete his UCAS form
PHOTO: ALAMY
moreP
Qback to contents
http://%20http//www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=2267http://%20http//www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=2267http://%20http//www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=2267http://%20http//www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=2267http://%20http//www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=2267http://%20http//www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=2267 -
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
30/47
PAGE 30THREEONLINE
For instance, I notice that some universities have been closing chemistry
departments where one of the key subject areas for understanding biology
is taught. This just makes no sense. Others close humanities departments
presumably because they are not viewed as protable. In my mind such
decisions need much greater thought than appears to be undertaken at
present. Chemistry and the humanities need to be taught if students are to
develop critical thinking skills and to acquire a broad knowledge about the
world we live in.
Research by University and College Union based on data provided by
UCAS shows that between 2006 and 2012, the total number courses
offered in the UK fell from 70,052 to 51,116, a reduction of 27%.
Since institutions may withdraw offered courses during the applications
cycle because, for example, insufcient students apply for them, UCASalso produces data on the number of courses available at the end of the
applications cycle. This is called the nal or published number of courses,
and showed a fall of 29% in the UK, from 50,077 to 35,687 courses,
between 2006 and 2012.
The reduction of total courses on offer during the applications cycle was
greatest in England, with a drop of 31%, followed by Northern Ireland
(24%), Wales (11%) and Scotland (3%).
Is there a link between the reduction in courses and
the public spending and tuition fee regime in the
different parts of the UK?
While tuition fees for full-time undergraduates from the UK at HEIs
in England will be up to 9,000 a year in 2012-13, Northern Ireland-
domiciled students studying in Northern Ireland will only have to pay
3,465, Welsh-domiciled undergraduates studying throughout the UK
will only have to pay 3,465, and Scottish-domiciled undergraduates
studying in Scotland will not have to pay any fees. So England, the country
with the highest rates of tuition fees, is facing the biggest reduction in the
number of undergraduate courses, and the country with the most benign
fee regime Scotland has much the lowest level of course cutting.
In addition, public spending cuts are the most severe in England, where
funding reductions are being implemented at the same time as public
spending on teaching in higher education is being replaced by full-time
undergraduate tuition fees of up to 9,000 a year.
Nevertheless, within the regions England there is a wide range in the
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
31/47
PAGE 31THREEONLINE
extent of course cutting. Nearly half (47%) of undergraduate courses are
being cut in the South West, but only 1% of courses are being cut in the
East Midlands.
Philip Schoeld, professor of the history of legal and political thought,
and director of the Bentham Project at University College London
(UCL), told UCU: limiting the number of courses will diminish the
student experience by curtailing their choice of subjects. It will adversely
affect new and innovative research by taking away the opportunities for
researchers to present their latest ndings and discussing their latest
theories to a receptive and inquisitive audience of students. It will close
off sources of knowledge. To sum up, it will make UK universities a much
less attractive proposition for both home and international students, who
value the depth and diversity of our research and teaching.
UCUs analysis of single-subject or principal degree courses showed that
in 2006, UK higher education institutions and further education colleges
provided 7,002 principal subject degree courses, across 141 subjects from
Pre-Clinical Medicine, to Others in Education. This number fell to 6,182
courses in 2010, a reduction of 11.7%, then to 5,968 in 2011, before rising
slightly to 6,024 in 2012. In all, between 2006 and 2012, there was a 14.0%
reduction in provision of these single subject degree courses.
While single subject STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics) degree courses fell by 14.6%, there were slightly lower
reductions in social sciences (12.8%) and arts & humanities (14.0%).
Although student numbers continued to rise through this period, the
prospect and implementation of public spending cuts from the nancial
crisis of 2008 onwards, will have had a signicant impact on single subject
course provision, as HEIs and Further Education Colleges providing
higher education have sought to reduce costs.
Although the reductions in principal subject courses in England wassimilar to the overall picture in the UK, there was a decline of almost one
quarter in the number of principal subjects provided in Wales between
2006 and 2012, with the falls slightly sharper in social sciences (25%) and
arts and humanities (25%) than in STEM (22%).
The fall in principal subjects provided in Scotland,
of 8% overall between 2006 and 2012, was around
half the rate of decrease in England, and more thanthree times less than in Wales.
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
32/47
PAGE 32THREEONLINE
While STEM and social science subjects were reduced by 9% each in
Scotland, arts and humanities subjects only fell by 2%.
Northern Ireland, like Scotland, showed only a relatively small decline in
the provision of principal subjects. This may be linked to the small number
of HE institutions in Northern Ireland, and a sense that, because of the
greater separation of the province from the rest of the UK, its HEIs have an
obligation to maintain a breadth in provision for home students.
To look in more detail at the change in courses, UCU selected a sample
of principal subjects in STEM, social sciences, and arts and humanities,
and analysed their provision on a regional basis in England. In the
UCU sample, some STEM courses were cut between 2006 and 2012,
particularly in biology, physical geographical sciences and computer
science. In social sciences, there was some reduction in provision between2006 and 2012 in some subjects in England, particularly in human and
social geography, and sociology.
And in arts and humanities subjects there
was a reduction in the number of institutions
providing some single subject courses in England,
particularly French studies, German studies, and
history by topic.
Some of these subjects were not provided in some English regions,
particularly the Eastern region (since 2010: no Latin studies, Classical
Greek studies, French studies, German studies, or Chinese studies); North
East (in 2012: no Latin studies, Classical Greek studies, French studies,
German studies, or History by topic); South West (in 2012: no Latin
studies, Classical Greek studies, Chinese studies, or History by area).
Donald Braben, honorary professor in life sciences at University CollegeLondon, expressed his concerns about the negative impact these changes
are having on higher education: I fear that we are going backwards.
Universities exist to challenge what we think we know and offer well-
argued and coherent alternatives. They are unique in these respects.
However, if we limit their scope and oblige them to concentrate on short-
term practical problems their advice might be indistinguishable from
that provided by many other sources. Meanwhile, the big problems would
continue unresolved.
All major developments in the last century were unpredicted. Take the
internet: were the universities being urged to offer lessons on the internet
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
33/47
PAGE 33THREEONLINE
in the 70s and 80s? Industrial opinion notoriously changes with their
balance sheets. If we gear institutions solely to what we perceive students
and employers want then that is precisely what we will get. Stagnation
will follow. But who was asking for the internet, for example, in the 70s or
80s?
And James Ladyman, professor of philosophy and head of the department
of philosophy at the University of Bristol, told UCU: I am really concerned
that under the new funding environment universities will look at
concentrating their resources on courses which they believe will deliver
the highest nancial return. The loss of the block grant has taken away an
important measure of nancial security that allowed institutions to plan
for the future.
Provision shouldnt be decided on the basis of short-term popularitycontests but when you introduce a market that is what happens.
Institutions need to be able to offer a wide breadth of courses, especially
with more students likely to study closer to home in the future. It is
very easy to undermine capacity quickly but takes years to rebuild these
knowledge bases. The intellectual culture of a university is massively
enhanced by having students studying a range of disciplines living and
studying together.
^UCcontributors welcome the chance to discuss their work. Responses to thisarticle should be sent to [email protected]
R back to the top
www.ucu.org.ukonline here
Qback
Qback to contents
http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/ -
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
34/47
ONLINE PAGE 34
Heading
THREE
Andrew Mourant
is a freelance
journalist and
author and regular
contributor to The
Guardian
Unannounced
observationsThe fight against unannounced lesson observations
in FE colleges could be UCUs next big battle
following its trial of strength with the Institute for
Learning (IfL) over membership fees. Discontent is
smouldering around the country among lecturers
who feel harassed and undermined when managers
walk in at the drop of a hat.
Although united and well-organised branches seem to have won
concessions in London and Manchester, overall the picture is
deteriorating. For UCU, this isnt a blanket protest about lecturers being
assessed and graded, but the way its done. We recognise some teachers
arent very good or may get burnt out, says national FE ofcer Dan
Taubman. But wed argue that best practice with lesson observation is tohave support that can help people improve.
Although UCU hasnt collected gures, Taubman believes that the
FURTHER EDUCATION
ALAMY
moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
35/47
PAGE 35THREEONLINE
unwelcome drop-in by management is becoming ever more commonplace,
ramped up because of increasingly high stakes over poor quality the
possibility of a bad Ofsted report and funding being withdrawn from poor
courses.
Weve had instances of colleges trying to link (observation) grades with
student attendance, says Taubman. Thats bonkers there are lots of
reasons why students dont always turn up, especially adults who lead
untidy lives. The issue isnt going to go away I think it will get worse.
Principals may claim this is an essential part of upholding standards but
UCU members believe that often the practice is intended to be punitive
rather than helping professional development. It ratchets up the stress
level and is used by rogue managers to harass staff, said the branch ofcer
of one London college (Jenny Sutton, CONEL)Weve had members whove been seen every day for a week. Teachers feel
constantly on the back foot. Its like were going to catch you out we
know youre lazy and cut corners, and were going to prove it.
There the dispute was over quality monitoring, curriculum managers
making regular sudden visits known as walk-throughs to all classes
observation by stealth, when managers come in not ostensibly to observe,
but saycheck if students are there on time.
The notorious walks-through have antagonised many a staffroom and
are just one aspect of unannounced observation, now said to be among
the most common reasons FE lecturers are quitting their job. Lecturers
at one central London college (City of Westminster) say the whole
process has been abused. Anyone receiving successive Grade 4s for poor
classroom performance found management turning this into a question of
competence which then raised the spectre of possible dismissal.
A grade 4 in our college covers things such as attendance and punctuality
of students, but that isnt the responsibility of teachers, said one UCU
negotiator. You can have a teacher whos loved by the students but
because attendance isnt good you get a grade 4.
Andrew Harden, the UCU ofcer whos advised FE members at local level,
believes unannounced observation could become the unions next cause
celebre having squared up to IfL. In London albeit that rm action has
wrung concessions from management it remains, he says a huge issue.
But whereas IfL is one entity, there over 300 colleges, each run differently.So, plenty more battles to ght. As an industry benchmark, Harden
is calling for at least three weeks warning for lecturers before theyre
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
36/47
PAGE 36THREEONLINE
observed though three weeks isnt worth what it was, because so much
more has to be crammed into that time.
We also argue it should be agreed for a named lesson, Harden says.
Where we dont achieve that, we should be looking at the smallest possible
window. But in some cases that can be a week. Thats ridiculous when an
Ofsted inspection is over three days.
Observations take numerous forms, none regarded with affection. One
college in the north west (Carlisle) has endured departmental observation
by line managers; whole college observations by managers and advanced
teaching practitioners; themed walk-throughs; mock Ofsteds conducted
by consultants; Ofsted itself; drop-ins by line managers; and extra
observations for staff who had previously fallen short.
Then theres the growth of peer observations, a result of targets set bymanagement as distinct from peer observations organised by tutors as
a supportive exercise. Some staff have been observed three times in a
week, said one branch ofcer (Paul Rivers). We had a colleague told that
she had to get used to it; while another said that students were unsettled
and upset by the level of observations. This never seems to be considered
by management.
Lecturers from a college in Hampshire (Farnborough) report that the
principal considers it her right to walk into any classroom at any time.Her gripe is that dont have any form of lesson plan, said the branch
secretary (Keith Cable). Were told that for every lesson, a plan, course le
and scheme of work must be available for inspection. A handwritten plan
needs maybe 10-15 minutes extra time for just one lesson thats adding
3-4 hours work per week.
The principal thinks we should use plans from previous years. But its not
possible for, say A Level business studies new materials are produced
each year; case studies need to be topical.
Oddly enough, the main complaints came from diligent and conscientious
teachers whod often get a grade A on a lesson observation anyway. But
UCU members are probably more likely to be chosen for a random check
than non-members, and some notably poor teachers escape scot free
while others are observed over and over again if problems are identied
regardless of their track record of effective teaching.
Insult was added to injury at one west country college (Swindon NewCollege) where management referred to unannounced observations
as mystery shopping. Staff protested both against the name and the
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
37/47
PAGE 37THREEONLINE
practice; only to nd it re-badged as the learning walk.
But, says local UCU ofcials, it amounts to the same thing; though
management have since spoken of limiting unannounced observations
to a two-week window. Moreover, students can also be disconcerted
when managers drop in out of the blue, a source of considerable stress or
anxiety especially for those with learning disabilities and/or depression.
Learning takes place in students minds the policy of unannounced
observations is not based on any recognised theory of learning, the
lecturer said. Subjectivity makes the process prone to abuse. It can be
subtly turned into a tool to intimidate staff.
And yet the colleges own training-related literature states that every
teacher needs.. .the time and tools to think about their own individual part
in the educational enterprise. Thats left staff wondering why the collegedoesnt practice what it preaches, and, rather than spend money on its
observation regime, invest in professional development.
Unannounced observations can add pressures to deploy good teaching
techniques on occasions we would not normally consider appropriate
were being led to deny our intuitive professional judgement, the lecturer
added. UCU has long identied that theres a temptation for people to
devote time and effort into faking an outstanding or good lesson.
Last autumn, one lecturer at another college in the north west (The
Manchester College) was driven to institute a grievance over unannounced
observation. He said it was being used as harassment and a cause of
such stress that this would be considered detrimental to health by any
reasonable person.
He was awarded a Grade 4 (unsatisfactory). As a direct resultmy
performance in teaching suffered, he said. I felt undermined and this
led to periods of depression. Having a policy in which any lesson may
be observed at any time is stressful to an intolerable degree like being
permanently under an Ofsted inspection regime.
The good news is that vigorous action by branch members can change
minds. At Westminster and Kingsway, after a battle lasting several years,
management offered a deal whereby for two years out of three, one lesson
only, chosen in advance, will be observed though in the third year, as
part of the colleges review week/internal inspection, lecturers may be
observed at any time during a three and half day window. UCU memberssee this as a signicant improvement.
At Hackney College, local UCU staff and management also joined forces
Qback moreP
Qback to contents
-
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
38/47
PAGE 38THREEONLINE
to avoid future conict. Its resulted in a system where one year therell
be a formal graded observation; the next, peer observation, ungraded. In
each case theres ve days notice ; and two lessons identied for possible
observation.
Vice principal Lois Fowler conceded that theres always an issue with
stress and how useful feedback is. With unannounced observations
there can be severe potential consequences for a member of staff if it
doesnt go well, she said. As a teacher I can understand why people feel
apprehensive.
Thanks to UCUs intervention several disputes in London have receded or
been resolved. But for every outpost of enlightenment, there appear to be
many more colleges far too many where management remains bent on
operating in the dark ages.
^UC contributors welcome the chance to discuss their work.Responses to this article should be sent to [email protected]
R back to the top
www.ucu.org.ukonline here
Qback
Qback to contents
http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/http://www.ucu.org.uk/ -
8/12/2019 UC Online, Issue 3
39/47
ONLINE PAGE 39
Heading
THREE
Susan Matthews
is an activist in
the Defend The
Right to Protest
campaign. Her
son Ale Meadows
was injured
and nearly died
during a student
demonstration in2010 as a result of a
blow from a baton.
Justice for Alfie
Weve h