ubc_2000-0351

download ubc_2000-0351

of 142

Transcript of ubc_2000-0351

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    1/142

    C O N T A M I N A N T T R A N S P O R T

    T H R O U G H

    A B A N D O N E D B O R E H O L E S

    I N

    F R A C T U R E D R O C K

    by

    S E A N

    R A Y M O N D P A T R I C K B U R N S

    B . A S c , University

    of

    B r i t ishColumbia,

    1997

    A T H E S I S S U B M I T T E D

    IN

    P A R T I A L F U L F I L L M E N T

    OF

    T H E R E Q U I R E M E N T S F O R T H E D E G R E E

    OF

    M A S T E R

    OF

    A P P L I E D S C I E N C E

    in

    T H E F A C U L T YOFG R A D U A T E S T U D I E S

    Department ofEarthand Ocean Science

    W e accept this thesis as conforming

    to the required standard

    T H E U N I V E R S I T Y OFB R I T IS H C O L U M B I A

    June2000

    Sean

    Raymond

    PatrickBurns,2000

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    2/142

    In present ing th i s t h e s i s i n p ar t i a l ful f i lme nt of the requirements

    for an advanced

    degree

    at the Uni ve rs it y of B r i t i sh Co lumbia , I

    agree that the L i b r a r y sha l l make i t fre el y av ai la bl e for refe rence

    and stud y. I fu rt he r agree tha t per mis si on for e x te n s i v e copying of

    t h i s t h e s i s f or s c h o l a r l y pur pos es may be gr an te d by the he ad of my

    department or by hi s or her re pr es en ta ti ve s. It i s underst ood t hat

    copying

    or pub l i ca t io n o f th i s t h e s i s for f in an ci al gain sh al l not

    be all owed without my wri tt en p er mis si on.

    Department

    The

    Univ ers i t y o f

    Br i t i sh Columbia

    Vancouver,

    Canada

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    3/142

    Abstract

    Abandoned explorationboreholes arecommonlyfound around mine sites in a fractured

    crystallinerock environment.

    I f

    the abandoned boreholes have not been properly

    decommissionedthey have the potential tocreateconnections through the rock fractures

    and

    influence ground water flow and contaminant transport. Afullythree-dimensional

    discrete fracture model is used to investigate the impact of abandoned boreholes on

    contaminant transport froma waste-rockpile overlyinga fractured rock mass. Dissolved

    contaminants travel through the fractured rockmassunder the influence of a sub-

    horizontalregionalhydraulicgradient towards a downstream compliance boundary. A

    number of different fracture geometries are investigated to gain an understanding of the

    fieldsituations inwhichabandoned boreholes can be expected to have an impact. The

    effect of fracture density,transmissivitycontrasts, and borehole diameter and

    location

    are

    studied.

    Thesimulationresults show

    that

    verticalabandoned boreholes are most l ikelyto

    have an impact when large,

    sub-horizontal, high-transmissivity

    featuresarepresentin the

    network. L o w fracture density,aperturevariability,

    relatively

    highhorizontal

    transmissivity,

    and the presence of major

    features

    in the fracture network all lead to

    abandoned boreholes having agreateroverallinfluence. If an abandoned borehole is

    transversely offset fromthe centralflow linepassing through the source zone the

    contaminant plume can migrate towards the borehole in adirectionnot predicted by the

    average regionalhydraulicgradient. In field-scale fracture networks smaller borehole

    diameters leads to shorter breakthrough times and higher contaminant concentrations at

    the downstream boundary due to the interplay between the fracture network and borehole

    void

    space. The presence of abandoned boreholes can be expected to have important

    implicationsin the design ofmonitoringnetworks todetectground water contamination

    whenthese

    fracture network and abandoned borehole properties exist.

    ii

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    4/142

    Table

    of Contents

    Abstract ii

    Table

    of Contents iii

    List

    ofTables v

    Listof

    Figures

    vi

    Acknowledgements ix

    1.0 Introduction 1

    2.0 Review 6

    3.0 Methods

    13

    3.1FractureNetworkModeling 13

    3.2Overview

    of the

    FRACMAN/MAFIC suite 13

    3.2.1 FRACWORKS 14

    3.2.2 MESHMONSTER 17

    3.2.3

    EDMESH

    18

    3.2.4

    MAFIC

    19

    3.3SoluteTransport 20

    3.4Implementation

    of

    Abandoned Boreholes 22

    3.4.1 Borehole

    as a

    Discrete

    Fracture

    23

    3.4.2

    Borehole-Fracture

    Intersections 27

    3.4.3 Test

    of

    FlowthroughBorehole 28

    3.4.4 Test

    of

    Particle

    Tracking

    throughBorehole 29

    3.4.5 Effect

    of

    BoreholeDiameter 31

    3.5

    Conceptual Model Description

    33

    4.0

    Results

    48

    4.1

    Base

    CaseFractureNetwork 48

    4.1.1 Fracture

    Generation Region

    50

    4.1.2 Base CaseBorehole 50

    4.1.3 Grid

    Discretization

    52

    4.1.4 Case1 -

    Base

    Case

    Results

    54

    4.2Influence

    of Background FractureNetwork

    60

    4.2.1 Case

    2 - Higher

    HorizontalTransmissivity 60

    4.2.2 Case

    3

    -Higher Vertical

    Transmissivity

    64

    4.3

    Influence

    of Major

    Features

    66

    4.3.1 Case4 - Major

    Feature Transmissivity

    =

    lxl0

    3

    m

    2

    /s 67

    4.3.2 Case

    5 -

    Threshold Effect 69

    4.3.3 Case

    6 -

    LowerFeatureTerminates

    atx = 30 m

    70

    iii

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    5/142

    4.4

    Influence of

    Borehole Location and Diameter

    72

    4.4.1

    Case -Boreholeatx = 0 m 72

    4.4.2 Case

    8 -

    Borehole

    atx = -35 m

    73

    4.4.3 Case

    9 -

    Borehole

    aty = 15 m 75

    4.4.4 Case

    10-

    Influence

    of

    Borehole Diameter 76

    4.5

    Case 11

    -

    Variable Network

    with No

    Major Features

    77

    5.0Discussion 112

    5.1Results Summary 112

    5.2

    Fracture Network Structure

    116

    5.3

    Implications

    for

    Monitoring Network Design

    119

    5.4

    Proper Borehole Decommissioning

    124

    6.0 Conclusions 126

    References 128

    iv

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    6/142

    List o fTables

    Table 3-1:Parametersfor analytical problem 32

    Table 4-1: Generation parametersfor

    base

    casefracturenetwork 48

    Table 4-2:

    F l o w

    andtransport output

    parameters

    for al l simulations 55

    Table 4-3: Generation

    parameters

    for Case 11

    fracture

    network 78

    Table 4-4: Borehole

    parameters

    for Case 11 80

    v

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    7/142

    Listof

    Figures

    Figure

    1-1: Contaminants leaching from a

    waste

    rock pile into a fractured rock

    aquifer 5

    Figure

    2-1:

    Aquifer

    cross-contamination due to abandoned

    w e l l

    in

    multiaquifer

    system 12

    Figure3-1:

    Definition

    of orientation convention used inF R A C M A N 36

    Figure3-2: Orthogonalview o fthe

    base

    casefracture network 37

    Figure3-3:Parametersfor incorporation of a circular borehole as a

    rectangular fracture 38

    Figure3-4:

    Discretization

    algorithm around the intersection of a borehole

    with

    afracture 39

    Figure3-5: Test of

    flow

    through a 10 cm diameter borehole 40

    Figure3-6: Fracture network designed totestparticle-tracking through the

    borehole 41

    Figure3-7: Particle breakthrough at downstream boundary fortestfracture

    network 42

    Figure3-8: Pathway of a single particle traveling through thetestfracture

    network 43

    Figure

    3-9:

    A n a l y t i c a l

    model used to

    test

    the effect of borehole size on

    f low

    rate

    and residence times 44

    Figure3-10:

    F l o w

    behaviour of a large

    void

    space

    within

    a thin conduit 45

    Figure3-11: Hypothetical mine site used to develop the conceptual model 46

    Figure3-12: Cross-sectionviewthrough the conceptual model showing

    boundaries and dimensions 47

    Figure4-1:Cross-section of

    base

    casefracture network showing fracture

    traces

    for background fractures and major

    features

    83

    Figure4-2: Orthogonal

    view

    ofmodelingdomain showing

    flow

    andtransport

    boundaries 84

    Figure

    4-3: Diagram of

    modeling

    domain and fracture generation region 85

    Figure4-4: Finite element

    grid

    discretization 86

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    8/142

    Figure4-5: Case - Particlebreakthrough at downstream exit boundary 87

    Figure4-6: Case

    -

    Lateral

    breakthrough distribution of particlesacrossexit

    boundary 88

    Figure4-7: Pathways of selected particles

    after

    exitingthe borehole 89

    Figure4-8:

    Snapshots

    of particles traveling through the fracture network when

    no borehole ispresent 90

    Figure4-9: Case 2 - Particle breakthrough at downstream boundary 91

    Figure

    4-10: Case 2 -

    Lateral

    breakthrough distribution of particles 92

    Figure4-11: Case 3 - Particle breakthrough at downstream boundary 93

    Figure4-12: Case 3 -

    Lateral

    breakthrough distribution o fparticles 94

    Figure4-13: Case 4 - Particle breakthrough at downstream boundary 95

    Figure4-14: Case 4 -

    Lateral

    breakthrough distribution o fparticles 96

    Figure4-15: Case 5 - Particle breakthrough at downstream boundary 97

    Figure4-16: Case 6 - Particlebreakthrough at downstream boundary 98

    Figure4-17: Case 6 - Lateral breakthrough distribution of particles 99

    Figure

    4-18: Case 7 - Particle breakthrough at downstream boundary 100

    Figure4-19: Case 7 - Lateralbreakthrough distribution of particles 101

    Figure

    4-20: Case 8 -

    Particle

    breakthrough at downstream boundary 102

    Figure 4-21:Case 8 -

    Lateral

    breakthrough distribution of particles 103

    Figure4-22: Case 9 - Particlebreakthrough at downstream boundary 104

    Figure4-23: Case 9 - Lateralbreakthrough distribution of particles 105

    Figure4-24: Case 10 - Influence of borehole diameter on downstream

    breakthrough curves 106

    Figure4-25: Case 10 - Influence of borehole diameter on total system

    f low

    and median particle residence times 107

    Figure4-26: Case 11 - Particlebreakthrough at downstream boundary for a

    random fracture network

    with

    no majorfeatures 108

    vii

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    9/142

    Figure

    4-27: Isometric views of borehole locations for Case 14 109

    Figure4-28: Case 11 - Particle breakthrough at downstream boundary for an

    entirelyrandom fracture network 110

    Figure4-29: Particle breakthrough at downstream boundary for aconstant

    aperturefracture network 111

    viii

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    10/142

    A c k n o w l e d g e m e n t s

    I

    would

    like

    to thank my supervisor,

    Leslie

    Smith,for his support, advice, guidance and

    patience during the preparation of this thesis. I am grateful for the support and advice of

    Petros Gaganis, Bob Parney, and the other graduate studentsin the U B Chydrogeology

    group who have

    given

    me advice over thepasttwo years.

    GolderAssociates

    L t d .

    developed the discrete fracture modeling code used in this study,

    and

    special thanks go to the F R A C M A N group in Seattle,includingTomDoe,

    Bi l l

    Dershowitz,

    Paul

    L aPointe and

    G l o r i

    Lee, who made the source code

    available,

    without

    whichIcouldnot have made the necessary

    modifications.

    I

    would l iketo give a very special thank you to my parents, G a i land RayBurns,who

    have beenincrediblysupportive over myuniversitycareer, and who have always

    encouraged me to

    follow

    my dreams.

    Claire

    Bradfordalso deserves special mention for

    her emotional support and editing prowess.

    Funding

    from theNationalScience andEngineeringResearch

    C o u n c i l

    providedfinancial

    support for this research.

    i x

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    11/142

    1.0

    Introduction

    Protecting

    and maintaining the quality of natural water supplies is necessary for the

    wel l

    being

    of

    a ll life

    on earth,

    including

    humanity. As the population

    of

    the

    world

    expands the

    demand for material goods

    w i l l

    increase, and new sources of raw minerals

    w i l l

    need to be

    uncovered and developed. In the

    past,

    poor and

    ill-advised

    mining

    practices have

    resulted in catastrophic

    pollution

    to water supplies and long-term environmental damage.

    Whilemining

    practices and accountability have improved significantly in recent years,

    environmental damage continues to occur at active sites and

    there

    is stillroom for

    improvement.

    Groundwater is the most vulnerable fresh water source to long-termpollutionfrom

    miningwaste, as residence times in the subsurface can be on the order oftensto hundreds

    ofyears.

    Once a ground water resource has been contaminated it is technically

    difficult

    and very expensive to remediate, i f it can be done at

    all.

    It is more cost-effective to

    engage

    in practices

    that

    prevent ground water contamination from occurring in the first

    place,

    than to

    attempt

    to clean up the problem afterwards. If proper care is taken a

    balance can be met between meeting the resource requirements of society while

    sustaining the quality of the ground water for the long term.

    M i n i n g

    typically

    requires the extraction of a small amount

    of

    valuable ore minerals from

    large volumes of sub-economicalganguematerial. Open-pitminingcan result in waste

    rockpiles and tailings dams

    that

    need to be managed fordecadesor even centuries.

    Waste rock is the material removed to gain access to the ore body, and usually contains

    1

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    12/142

    metallicminerals such as pyrite,whichhave no economical value. Figure 1-1 depicts a

    situation

    inwhicha waste rock pile is situated in an elevated area

    overlying

    a fractured

    rockmass. Over long time periods exposure to

    rainfall

    and atmospheric oxygen can

    result in acidic water leaching out

    of

    the waste rock piles and

    mobilizing

    toxic heavy

    metals. This process is commonly referred to as

    acid

    rock drainage

    ( A R D ) .

    If no

    impervious

    barrier is

    present

    to impede migration the metals

    w i l l

    travel

    vertically

    through

    the unsaturated zone and reach the water table, contaminating the underlying ground

    water.

    Underthe Environmental Assessment Act in

    B r i t ishColumbia

    a potential mine site must

    be rigorously studied to

    assess

    any potential for ground water contamination ( R S B C

    1996). A compliance boundary for a site is established to delineate the maximum extent

    atwhichsome degradation to the

    local

    ground water quality is deemed acceptable by the

    regulatory agency. A network of compliance monitoring wells is installed at the

    compliance

    boundary and ground water is regularly sampled. If contamination above a

    threshold value is detected at the compliance boundary then the site owner

    w i l l

    face

    financial

    penalties on top of the cost of

    containing

    and remediating the contamination.

    The processes governing

    A R D

    are

    still

    an active area of research, and

    there

    is a

    great

    deal

    of

    uncertainty when predicting contaminant fluxes to the subsurface. Once contaminants

    have reached the water table

    there

    is the potential for off-site migration in the direction of

    ground water

    f low.

    Numericalmodels are useful to help predict contaminant fluxes from

    potential sources at a site and

    assess

    the risk of exceeding the threshold concentration at

    2

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    13/142

    the compliance boundary. Ground water modeling for a fractured rock terrain is more

    complicatedthan in porous media due to theheterogeneous

    nature

    of a fractured rock

    mass.

    F l o w

    is often concentrated in asmallsubsetof the total number of fractures and

    contaminant transport occurs along complicated, tortuous pathways. Gathering

    hydrogeologicalcharacterization data in crystalline rock is very expensive, so the amount

    ofinformation available to the modeler is usually quite

    limited.

    The higher uncertainty in

    characterizing

    fractured rock leads to additional engineering effort and expense.

    One source of uncertainty at a mine site

    overlying

    fractured rock is the presence of any

    abandoned exploration boreholes around the ore body. Before a mine can be developed

    the ore body must be delineated, so a developed mine site may havetensto hundreds of

    explorationboreholes.

    I f

    previous

    phases

    ofexplorationat a site

    failed

    todetect

    economic

    mineralizationthen all

    dri l l ing

    records for a sitecouldbe lost. If the boreholes

    were not properly grouted before being abandoned they can act as conduits between

    stratigraphic layers, or

    form

    preferential pathways in the fracture network. The potential

    for

    cross-contamination of layered aquifers

    that

    are perforated by boreholes is

    wel l

    understood. It is hypothesized

    that

    in a fractured rock the boreholes

    could

    connect

    fractures creating a preferential pathway and

    allowing

    contamination to travel faster to

    the compliance boundary, or contaminating a previously protected zone. Connections

    can

    be formed

    that

    cannot be anticipated based solely on knowledge o fthe statistical

    fracture geometry and the contaminant plume may move in a direction not anticipated

    based on conventional porous medium approximations.

    3

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    14/142

    Thisthesis investigates the potential impacts

    that these

    abandoned boreholescouldhave

    at a mine site underlain by a fractured rock mass. The conceptual model assumes

    that

    contaminated leachate

    from

    a waste rock

    pile

    has reached the water table. A three-

    dimensionaldiscrete fracture code is used to model the flowand contaminant transport

    through the fracture network and to

    assess

    the impacts the boreholes have on the system.

    Theobjectiveo fthis thesis is to gain an understanding of the types of subsurface

    conditionswhere abandonedexplorationboreholes have the potential to exacerbate a

    contaminationproblem,or reduce the effectiveness of amonitoringnetwork design.

    The

    first two chapters present themotivationfor the work and a review of related work

    on

    fracture networkmodelingand the effects of abandoned

    wells

    and boreholes. In the

    third

    chapter themodelingmethodology is presented along

    with

    themodifications

    that

    were necessary for the purposes of

    this

    study. The fourth chapterpresentsthe results of

    the set ofsimulationsused to demonstrate the effects of boreholes in different fracture

    networks.

    Thef inaltwo chapters explaintheimplicationsof thesimulationresults and

    summarize theconclusions

    that

    can be drawnfromthis study.

    4

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    15/142

    5

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    16/142

    2.0Review

    Numericalmodels for simulating flow and transport in porous media have been available

    forseveraldecades(e.g. Freeze, 1971;McDonaldand

    Ffarbaugh,

    1988; Zheng,1990).

    Recently, the potential for siting high-level radioactivewasteindeepcrystalline rock has

    prompted

    interest in modeling flow and transport through fractures (e.g. Dverstorp et al.,

    1992; Chanet al., 1993; Bodvarsson et al.,1997).

    Fracturemodeling has been applied on a variety of lengthscalesfrom a single fracture to

    field-scale networks. The simplest model for fracture flow is that of two parallelplatesof

    constant aperture (e.g. Snow, 1965; Witherspoon et al.,1980). Several

    studies

    have been

    conducted on flow and transport through a single fracture with various complicating

    factors including spatial variability in the aperture (Brown, 1987; Raven et al., 1988;

    Morenoet al.,1988),diffusion into the porous rock matrix (e.g. Sudicky andFrind, 1982;

    Neretnieks, 1980) and surface sorption (e.g.Burkholder,1976; Freeze andCherry, 1979;

    Wels and Smith,1994). Laboratoryexperiments on flow through a single fracture have

    suggestedthat the cubic law is not valid for most naturallyoccurringrough-walled

    fractures (e.g. Raven et al., 1988) but most discrete fracture models make this assumption

    due to limitations on the complexity that can be modeled over large domains.

    Fieldscalemodels for flow and transport through fracture networksfallunder one of

    three broad categories: (National ResearchCouncil,1996) (1) equivalent continuum

    models which model the fracture network using average properties (e.g. Neuman, 1987;

    Carreraet al.,1990),(2) discrete network simulation models which account for each

    fracture individually (e.g. Smith et al., 1985; Dershowitz et al,

    1995),

    and (3)

    hybrid

    6

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    17/142

    techniqueswhichapply somecombinationof the previous two approaches (e.g. Schwartz

    and

    Smith,

    1988;

    L a

    Pointe et al. ,1995).

    Equivalent

    continuum models do notattemptto model each fracture pathway

    individually,but use an average representation

    o f

    the

    hydraulic conductivity

    field. The

    main

    advantage o f

    these

    models is

    that

    they can be less computationally intensive than

    discrete fracture models so a larger domain can be modeled.

    This

    approach is most

    appropriate whenmodelinga rock

    with

    many fracture connections or significant matrix

    permeability.

    When

    the network is heterogeneous

    with

    large contrasts in hydraulic

    conductivity,equivalent continuum models require a fine

    grid

    discretizationand can

    become as computationally intensive as discrete fracture methods

    ( N a f f

    et

    al. ,

    1998a,b).

    In

    sparsefracture networks the

    individual

    fracture connections and tortuous pathways

    may

    need to be incorporated torealisticallymodel solute transport.

    Discretefracture network modelsattemptto include every important fracture in the rock

    mass as an

    individual

    feature in themodel. The models can be eithertwo-dimensional

    where the fractures are represented by interconnected

    line

    elements, or three-dimensional

    where the fractures are planar features. There are three-dimensional models available,

    based onfinitedifference (e.g. Therrien andSudicky, 1996) orfiniteelement (e.g.

    Dershowitzet

    al. ,

    1995)discretizationschemes,that

    allow

    for secondary

    f low

    through

    the porousmatrix. Nordqvistet

    al .

    (1992) presented a three-dimensional model

    that

    couldsimulate aperture variability

    within individual

    fractures. The more complex the

    model,the smaller the sizeo fthe domain

    that

    can be modeled, due to computational

    7

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    18/142

    limitations.

    The mainadvantageof discrete network models is

    that

    they include the

    physical

    structure of the fracture network and can account for fracture connections and

    preferential

    flowpaths that

    may be of

    primary

    importance, especially in

    sparse

    networks.

    The disadvantage to

    these

    models is

    that

    they are more computationally intensive, and

    require extensive site characterization data to be any more meaningful than an equivalent

    continuum

    approximation.

    H y b r i d

    models have evolved from anattemptto combine the benefits of both equivalent

    continuum

    and discrete fracture models. There are a variety of approaches used to

    combine the physical accuracy of discrete networks

    with

    the computationaladvantagesof

    a

    statistical continuum. One approach has been to analyze the fracture network and only

    include

    the major conducting conduits (e.g. La Pointe et a l , 1995). This approach is

    valuable only if it can be assumed

    that

    the smaller fractures are not important to the

    f low

    and transport. Another method

    uses

    small-scale discrete fracture networks to

    generate

    statistics for

    flow

    and transport

    that

    are subsequently applied to a field-scale continuum

    model(Schwartz and Smith, 1988; Parney and Smith, 1995). This modeling approach is

    asubject ofongoingresearch to try and determine appropriate

    links

    between small and

    large-scale simulations.

    One common purpose for modeling subsurface

    flow

    from a potential contamination

    source is to aid in the design ofmonitoringnetworks. A significant amount of research

    has been done onoptimizingthe design ofmonitoringnetworks in porous media.

    Massmannand Freeze (1987)presenta framework for the design ofmonitoringnetworks

    8

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    19/142

    whichincorporates uncertainty in the selection of a

    best

    network alternative.

    Meyer

    et al.

    (1994) provide a comprehensive method for

    optimizing

    monitoring network design by

    minimizing

    network cost,maximizingthe probability of detection, and

    minimizing

    the

    sizeof the plume at the time of detection. Storck et al.(1997) expanded this work to a

    fully three-dimensional analysis for porous media. Jardine et al.(1996) expand upon the

    method ofMassmannand Freeze (1987) to provide a decision-analysis framework for the

    design of

    monitoring

    networks in fractured rock, using a two-dimensional discrete

    fracture model to evaluate the

    best

    alternative from a number of

    alternate

    monitoring

    strategies. A comprehensive presentation of

    monitoring

    network design in a

    three-

    dimensional

    fractured rock

    mass

    has yet to be provided.

    The potential environmental hazards from abandoned

    drinking

    water wells arewidely

    known. Most

    o f

    these

    wells contain a steel casing but through time the casing can

    corrode exposing the contacting sediments to the

    we l l

    bore water. If the

    w e l l

    crosses a

    low

    permeability unit, such as a clay aquitard,

    there

    is the potential for cross

    contamination into previously protected aquifers. Figure 2-1 shows a

    typical

    situation

    where the potential for cross contamination exists. Pumping from the lower confined

    aquifer cancausecontaminants to migrate downwards from the upper unconfined aquifer

    through the abandoned w e l l . The ground water resource in the lower aquifer is polluted

    and the potential exists for contaminants to reach the water supplyw e l l .

    Many

    jurisdictionshave

    legislation

    requiring landowners to properly grout and decommission

    abandoned wells on their property.

    I f

    the landowner

    does

    not comply they can be held

    liable

    for any contamination problems broughtaboutfrom their

    wells.

    9

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    20/142

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    21/142

    A l l

    of the above studies dealwiththe environmental impacts of abandoned boreholes in a

    porous medium or an equivalent

    continuum.

    No

    attempt

    has yet been made to

    assess

    the

    impact of abandonedexplorationboreholes in a fractured rock environment using a

    discrete fracturemodel. The heterogeneous

    nature

    of contaminant transport through

    fractured rock means

    that

    equivalent continuum models are not sufficient to properly

    address the influence ofleakyboreholes. The present study

    uses

    a discrete fracture

    modelto investigate the impact of abandonedexplorationboreholes on contaminant

    transport froma surface waste rockpilethrough a fractured rock mass.

    11

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    22/142

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    23/142

    3.0Methods

    3.1

    FractureNetworkModeling

    In

    this study a three-dimensional discrete fracture model was used to model

    flow

    and

    transport through the fracture network. It was necessary to take account of the fracture

    scale heterogeneity to properly model the influence of an abandoned borehole in a

    fractured rock mass. The influence of

    individual

    fractures and connected pathways

    through the rock matrix are an important

    physical

    process

    that

    needed to be included in

    the chosenmodel. For this reason, using an averaging method such as the statistical

    continuum

    methodwouldnot be appropriate. The

    F R A C M A N / M A F I C

    suite of programs

    developed by

    Golder

    Associates (Dershowitz et

    al .

    1995) was chosen as it provides

    nearly a ll of the required tools,fromfracture network generation to

    flow

    and contaminant

    transport modeling.The mainmodificationrequired was the addition of a routine to

    incorporate abandoned boreholes.

    F R A C M A N / M A F I C

    provides the advantageof

    allowing

    complex fracture geometry to be included in the analysis. This could

    allow

    for

    a

    wide variety of fracture networks to be investigated byfollowingthe method described

    in

    this thesis.

    3.2

    Overview

    of the

    FRACMAN/MAFIC suite

    Four

    applicationsfromthe

    F R A C M A N

    suite were used to model the discrete fracture

    network and solve the

    f low

    and transport

    problem: F R A C W O R K S , M E S H M O N S T E R ,

    E D M E S H ,

    and

    M A F I C . F R A C W O R K S

    is used to

    generate

    the three-dimensional

    fracture networks,

    M E S H M O N S T E R

    is used to

    create

    a basic finite-element mesh,

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    24/142

    E D M E S H is used to make appropriate refinements to the mesh, and M A F I C is used to

    solve flow

    and contaminant transport through the fracture network.

    3.2.1 FRACWORKS

    F R A C W O R K S allows a wide variety of discrete

    features

    to be generated from

    deterministic or stochastic descriptions. The

    base

    casefracture geometry for the

    simulations

    presented in the

    following

    chapter was generated using a combination of

    deterministic fractures to model two majorfeaturesand two stochastic fracture setsfor

    the background network. The first

    stage

    of generating a three-dimensional fracture set is

    to choose a generation

    model.

    The random networks used in this study were generated

    using

    the Poisson Rectangle model. This is a

    simplified

    version

    o f

    the Enhanced Baecher

    model

    (Dershowitz et

    al.,

    1989),

    with

    fracture dimensions specified using length and

    width

    instead of an effective radius.

    The Poisson model

    assumes that

    the fracture

    centers

    are randomly distributed in space.

    Once

    the fracture center has been chosen, the fracture geometry is determined by

    specifying

    the dimensions and orientation ofthe fracture. Fracture mechanicssuggest

    that

    the general

    shape

    of a fracture in homogeneous rock

    w i l l

    be

    e l l ipt ical

    (Baecher et al.

    1977). The

    base case

    geometry assumed

    square

    planar fractures for

    simplicity,

    although

    polygonal

    approximations to

    e l l ipt ical

    fractures are incorporated in the

    f inal

    simulations

    with

    minimal

    additional computational effort.

    14

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    25/142

    The fracture density is determined by specifying the number of fractures togenerate,and

    the sizeo fthe generation region. In the

    base

    casethe background network consisted of

    two

    sets

    of 750 fractures, generated in the

    following

    region:

    -62.5 m

    st

    a3

    T3

    O

    co

    o

    +

    LU

    o

    Csi

    CO

    O

    +

    LU

    O

    o

    O

    CM

    O

    CO

    O

    CD

    d

    CM CO

    O

    CO

    o

    o

    CN

    O

    O

    O

    +

    LU

    O

    S

    bxi

    42

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    53/142

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    54/142

    3 - 9 : Schematicofanalyticalmodel usedto test theeffect of borehole sizeonflowrate andresidence time

    44

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    55/142

    s / c i u )

    a j e y w v o y

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    56/142

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    57/142

    47

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    58/142

    4.0 Results

    4.1 Base Case Fracture Network

    Thebase

    case fracture network consists oftwo orthogonal fracture setsand two large

    horizontalfractures. The large fractures represent major features ofhighconductivityin

    the horizontal plane, such as sedimentary bedding planes or large fissures caused by

    erosional unloading. The smaller fractures are randomly sampledfrom twosetsof

    statisticalparameters, and represent the background fracture network. Figure 4-1 shows

    the fracture

    traces

    on a cross-section through the center of the modeling domain. The

    major features are connected through the background fracture network, but no single

    background

    fracture is large enough to directly connect the two major features.

    Therefore, all

    flow

    and transport must take place along some indirect pathway through

    the network. A single, transmissive fracture

    that

    connected the two major features would

    createa preferential pathway through the network, and producesimilarresults to

    includinga borehole in the network. The generation parameters for a llof the fractures in

    thebasecase network are provided in Table 4-1.

    Parameter

    Fracture

    set one

    Fracture

    set two

    Generation

    Region

    125 m x 65 m x 40 m 125 m x 65 m x 40 m

    Number

    of Fractures 750

    750

    Fracture

    M o d e l Poisson

    Rectangle

    Poisson

    Rectangle

    GenerationMode Centers

    Centers

    TruncationMode Of f Of f

    Number

    of Sides 4 4

    Pole(trace, plunge)

    0 ,90

    0 ,

    0

    Poledistribution Constant Constant

    Fracture dimension lOmx 10m

    lOmx

    10m

    Transmissivity

    lxl0

    6

    m

    2

    /s lxl0

    6

    m

    2

    /s

    Aperture

    l x l 0

    4

    m l x l 0

    4

    m

    Table4-1:Generation parameters forbasecase fracture network

    48

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    59/142

    The

    statistics for both

    sets

    of

    background

    fractures are

    identical,

    except for orientation.

    The base

    case network is meant to represent the simplest possible situation, therefore all

    fractures in a given set have the same orientation, aperture, and size. The center of each

    fracture is randomly positioned

    within

    the fracture generationregion. It is possible to

    sample any

    ofthese

    parameters from probabilitydistributions, but constant values are

    used in the

    base

    casesimulationfor

    simplicity

    and toeasecomparisons

    with

    later

    simulations.

    In

    the

    base

    case scenario, both of the large fractures have atransmissivityof

    l x l

    0

    4

    m

    2

    /s

    and extend laterally across the entire modeling domain. The transmissivity

    of

    the major

    features is two orders of magnitude higher than

    that

    of the background fractures

    which,

    combined

    with

    their large areal extent, causes them to dominate the

    flow

    system. The

    uppermost feature located at z = 10m is bounded onal lsides by impermeable

    boundaries,whilethe lower feature located at z =

    -8

    m intersects a constant head

    boundary on the right-hand side. The contaminant source zone is located at the top

    of

    the

    domainon the left-hand side as shown in Figure4

    -2 .

    For contaminants to reach the exit

    boundary on the right-hand side they must travel at least partly through the background

    fracture network to reach the major features.

    Most

    of the particles representing the

    contaminant release

    w i l l

    travel partly along the major features and partly along the

    backgroundfractures to reach the exit boundary, although asmallpercentage w i l l bypass

    the major features and travelonlyin the background network.

    4 9

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    60/142

    4.1.1

    Fracture

    Generation Region

    The generation region for the background fractures is larger than the modeling domain to

    avoid

    'boundary effects'

    within

    themodeling

    domain.

    The generation algorithm

    randomly

    positions a fracture center

    within

    the generationregion. Because fracture

    centers

    w i l l

    not be positioned outside the boundaries, a certain amount of fractures

    that

    overlap the boundaries

    w i l l

    be

    missing,

    resulting in a sparser fracture network near the

    generation region boundaries.

    I f

    the generation region is larger than themodelingby the

    widthof the largest fracture generated this error w i l lbeeliminated. For this reason the

    fractures were generated in a 125 x 65 x 40 meter region for the 100 x 50 x 25 meter

    modelingdomain as shown in Figure 4-3.

    4.1.2Base

    Case

    Borehole

    For

    al l

    of

    the different fracture networks investigated in this study, the

    f low

    and transport

    modelis first

    solved

    without any boreholes present, and then the same model is

    solved

    witha borehole in aspecified location. The resultsfromthe two simulations are then

    compared

    to determine the effects of the borehole on the fracture networkf lowand

    contaminant transport. Theverticalborehole for thebasecase fracture network is located

    at x = -25 m and y = 0 m.

    A s

    can be seen inFigure4-1, the borehole intersects the two major conductive zones at z

    =

    8 m and -10 m respectively and any background fractures in between.

    F l o w

    canenter

    or

    leave the borehole at any intersection, depending on the

    l oc a l

    hydraulichead

    distribution.

    In thebasecase

    simulation

    the flowdown the borehole variesonlyby a

    50

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    61/142

    small

    percentagebetween the major features, representing the

    limited

    hydraulic

    interactionof the boreholewiththe background network. I fthe f lowthrough the

    boreholedecreasesby 1 after a fracture intersection thenthereis a1 chancethat

    particles w i l lleave the borehole at

    that

    intersection andenterthe background fracture

    network. There is a9 9 chance they w i l l continue traveling down the borehole.

    The borehole diameter for thissimulationwas 10cm. The mathematical algorithm

    allows

    for boreholes of any size and orientation to beincludedin the finite-element

    model,

    as

    long

    as the

    finite

    element

    grid

    is designed to

    ensure

    an appropriate refinement

    around

    any borehole-fracture intersections.

    A s

    explained in Chapter 3,

    i f

    a borehole's diameter is large it may not act as a fast-

    pathway, butrathercan increase contaminant residence times. The large radius borehole

    w il l

    contain a significant volume of water compared to the

    rest of

    the fracture network,

    and will act likea reservoir or holding-tank in the system. This w i l lbe thecase i fthe

    volumeofvoidspace in the borehole is large in comparison to the volume ofvoid space

    in therestof the fracture network, and the borehole isonlyconnected to the constant

    head boundaries through thethinbackground fractures. Whilea larger borehole radius

    w il l

    raise theoverallhydraulic conductivityof the fracture network and therefore the total

    flow

    through the fracture network, the volume of water

    w i l l

    be much larger and the

    residence times

    w i l l

    increase

    significantly. S m a l l

    diameter boreholes may

    form

    previouslyunavailable pathways,

    while

    not

    significantly

    increasing the volume of

    void

    space in the system, thereby decreasing contaminant residence times and increasing

    51

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    62/142

    maximumconcentrations at the downstream boundary. The effect ofusingdifferent

    borehole diameters in the

    base

    case fracture network is investigated later in this chapter.

    Figure4-1 shows

    that therew i l l

    be numerous possible

    paths thatw i l l

    lead

    from

    the

    source to the exit boundary. However,no

    individual

    fracture islongenough to connect

    the major features, and particles must travel along both

    of

    the background fracture

    sets.

    It should be noted

    that

    atwo-dimensionaltrace plot such as thisw i l lalways appear less

    connected than the corresponding three-dimensional network asthereis another

    dimension

    for connections to be made

    in .

    This

    base

    case fracture network is

    we l l

    connected

    with

    many possible

    paths

    for particles to travel along to reach the exit

    boundary.

    4.1.3

    Grid

    Discretization

    Figure

    4-4 shows the finite-element

    grid

    discretization

    of

    the lower large

    high-

    conductivityfracture. Note the further gridrefinement around the borehole location and

    the fracture intersections. Thisrefinement was done to reduce model errors where the

    hydraulicgradients were l ikelyto be large. The

    grid

    refinement shown was chosen as the

    point

    atwhichfurther

    grid

    refinement did not lead to significant changes in the

    flow

    or

    particle

    transport results.

    Thislevel

    ofdiscretizationresulted in approximately 20000

    nodes and 35000 elements for the

    base-case

    scenario. Some subsequent simulations

    with

    more complicated fracture networks required close to 100000 elements.

    Available

    computer memory allowed simulations of up to 300000 elements, but this

    level

    of

    discretizationwas not found to be necessary for the fracture networks considered here.

    52

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    63/142

    A nincrease in the fracture densities overthoseusedherewouldbe approaching the limits

    ofa Pentium II, 450

    M H z

    machine

    with

    196

    M B

    ofR A M . A single

    base-case

    simulation

    including

    fracture generation,

    discretizing,

    editing and

    solving

    the finite element model

    takesapproximately 15 minutes on the above machine. Some of the more complex

    simulations

    took several hours to complete.

    It was found

    that

    approximately 1000 particles were needed to provide a reliable

    breakthrough curve at the exit boundary for a single realization of the fracture geometry.

    Certain

    simulations required significantly more than 1000 particles to be injected at the

    source due to some particles becoming stuck in the system.

    Using

    a constant

    concentration at the source zone for all simulationswouldresult in a higher number of

    particles entering the system for fracture networks

    with

    high

    f lowrates.

    For the purposes

    o fthis study the amount of

    mass

    entering the system for different fracture networks is not

    as important as the behaviour of the

    mass

    once it has entered the network. For this reason

    the number

    o f

    particles traveling through the system was kept constant

    rather

    than the

    source concentration, so concentration values shown on breakthrough curves should be

    interpreted in a relativesense. The longitudinal and transverse dispersivities were set at

    1.0 m and 0.707 m respectively. Test simulations found

    that

    most o fthe plume spreading

    was due to tortuous pathways in the fracture network and not due to the dispersivity.

    Setting

    the dispersivities several orders of magnitude lower yielded

    similar

    results.

    53

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    64/142

    4.1.4 Case1 - Base CaseResults

    Table4-2 shows a summary of the results ofa llsimulations described in this chapter,

    includingthe

    base

    case scenario.

    Q

    s y s

    is the total system

    f low,

    representing the

    f low

    entering through the upstream constant head boundary and

    leaving

    through the

    downstream boundary.

    V b

    0 r

    is the downward ground water

    velocity

    in the borehole, and

    Qbor

    is the

    volumetric flowrate

    through the borehole. The parameter

    % Qb

    0 r

    is equal to

    Qbor /

    Qsys

    x 100% andrepresentsthe percentage

    o f

    the total system

    f low

    thattravels

    through the borehole. The T parameters are as defined in Chapter 3.

    It can be seen

    from

    Table 4-2

    that

    the total

    flow

    through the fracture network increases by

    afactor of3.3from 3.07x10

    5

    m

    3

    /s to 1.02xl0

    4

    m

    3

    /s when the borehole isincluded, while

    the mean contaminant breakthrough timedecreasesby a factor of 7.8. When the borehole

    is

    present in the

    base

    case scenario it controls the

    flow

    system, channeling 87% of the

    network

    flow

    and 98.5%o fthe particles released at the source.

    Figure4-5 shows the breakthrough of particles at the exit boundary for the

    base

    case

    simulation

    with

    and without a borehole.

    Both

    plots are normalized bydividingthe

    number of particles exiting during a specific time period by the total number of particles

    travelling

    through the network. For instance, the spike in the breakthrough curve for the

    case

    with

    a borehole means

    that

    9% of the particles exited during

    that

    particular time

    period. Eachtime period is 2000 slong. The curve is smoothed using a

    moving

    average

    o fthe

    three

    closest time periods.

    54

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    65/142

    T

    ii

    u

    o

    a

    a

    Q

    CS

    S

    3

    Vi

    u

    u

    CN

    CN

    0

    S

    55

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    66/142

    The

    effects of

    adding

    a borehole in this scenario can be quite clearly seen on this plot.

    The

    simulation

    with

    the borehole has a much higher spike of particles exiting in a short

    time period,which

    represents

    a higher concentration of contaminant than the

    case

    without

    the borehole. Furthermore, contaminants reach the downstream boundary earlier

    in

    time for the

    case

    with

    the borehole. In fact, most of the particles have already exited

    byt = l x l 0

    5

    s in thecase

    with

    the borehole, whereas in thecasewithout the borehole the

    first

    few particles are just beginning to reach the downstream boundary at this time. The

    parametersused to quantify theshapeof the breakthrough curve are T io ,T

    5

    oand

    T

    9

    o. Tio

    is

    the time when 10% of the particles have exited at the downstream end of the modeling

    domain,and

    represents

    the nose o fthe breakthrough curve.

    T 5 0

    is the time when

    half

    o f

    the particles have exited and is

    identical

    to the median of the particle breakthrough times.

    T9 0is the time when 90%o fthe particles have exited and

    represents

    the

    tail

    o fthe

    breakthrough curve. The difference between

    T9 0

    andT ioquantifies the spread of the

    breakthrough curve. A lower spreadwouldcorrespond to a more tightly contained

    plume,and higher contaminant concentrations at the downstream boundary, as is seen in

    the

    base

    casescenario

    with

    the borehole. Theparameters T25 ,T

    7 5

    , and

    T 9 5

    are also

    included

    to give a complete description of the breakthrough curve. Table 4-2 gives the

    values of the

    parameters

    described above for all simulations,

    including

    the

    base

    case.

    Figure4-6 is a plot of the exit

    location

    of each particle against its exit time. The vast

    majorityof the particles reach the downstream boundarywhile

    travelling

    along the lower

    major conduit, and exit at thesame

    longitudinal

    and

    vertical

    location (x = 50m, z = -10

    m). For this reason the plot shows the transverse, or y-component o fthe exit

    location

    vs.

    56

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    67/142

    time.

    The time axis islogarithmic.

    This

    plot shows the temporal and transverse spread

    ofthe particles at breakthrough, and where along the y-axis particles show up first.

    The

    mostapparentdifference between the two scenarios is the order-of-magnitude longer

    time for particles to travel through the fracture network when no borehole is

    present.

    Anotherinterestingfeature

    thatcould

    not be seen on the breakthrough plots is the

    structure of the contaminant plume when a borehole is

    present.

    It can be seen

    from

    this

    plotthatthe borehole controls the

    flow

    system in the large fracture, andthatthe

    f low

    lines

    in the fracture are

    similar

    to

    thosethat

    occur in a confined aquifer

    with

    an injection

    w e l l . Particles close to the center of the domain tend to exit first as they

    fol low

    the most

    direct pathwayfrom the borehole to the exit boundary. Particles

    that

    exit further from the

    center of the domain take longer to reach the boundary, as they have to travel along a

    longer arc, even backwards forpartof the journey. The particles spread laterally almost

    across the entire domain. The impermeable boundaries at either side of the domain

    interfere

    with

    the

    f low

    system and

    l imit

    the spread o f

    particles.

    These boundaries

    representundisturbed

    flow

    lines in the regional

    flow

    system, andwhileitwouldbe

    desirable to have the boundaries as far away as possible, computational requirements

    l imi tthe sizeo fthe domain.

    One

    interesting

    feature

    to

    note

    for the

    case

    with

    the borehole is

    that

    the temporal spread

    o fthe plume is even less than depicted on the breakthrough curve. The breakthrough

    curve for any given lateral

    location w i l l

    encompass a smaller time spread than when the

    breakthrough is averaged across the entire

    y-axis. Thismeans that

    the breakthrough

    57

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    68/142

    curve is underestimating the maximum concentrations through averaging along the lateral

    direction,and concentrations for thecase

    with

    the borehole

    w i l l

    be even higher than

    already shown.

    Figure4-7 shows the pathway a single particletakesfromthe source zone to the exit

    boundary.

    After

    the particle exits the borehole it travels backwards along the x-axis to

    the upstream impermeable boundary. As it approaches the boundary the ground water

    velocitycarries it outwards in the negative ydirection. Near the lateral boundaries the

    velocity

    is in the positive x

    direction

    which

    carries the particle towards the exit boundary

    again.

    The particle exists at y = -24.1 m. Particles

    exiting

    towards the outskirts

    of

    the

    domain

    must travel along a much longer path resulting in a later exit-time for both the

    first

    and last particles to reach the boundary. Particles

    that

    leave the borehole on the

    downstream side travel

    directly

    to the downstream boundary under a strong gradient, and

    exitthe system at the earliest time. When a particle leaves an element at any intersection,

    theprobabilityof it entering any other intersecting element is based on the proportion of

    flow

    to

    that

    element. Stream-tube routing is not incorporated in the

    M A F I C flow

    and

    transport code.

    Some clustering can be observed in the lateral

    exit-location

    of particles for the

    case

    without

    the borehole.

    This

    is due to heterogeneity in the discrete fracture network caused

    by the random distribution of fractures in the domain. Althoughall fractures have the

    sameequivalent radius andtransmissivity,areas

    with

    greaterthan average fracture

    densities

    w i l l

    result in higher

    l oc a l

    permeability and preferential

    f low

    paths.

    58

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    69/142

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    70/142

    The

    following

    set of simulations investigates the effect of changing the fracture network

    transmissivities,while

    keeping the geometrical properties the same. To facilitate

    comparison

    with

    the

    base

    casescenario thesamerandom-number seed was used to

    generate

    the fracture network, resulting in the exactsamelocations for the fractures.

    4.2 Influenceof Background Fracture Network

    4.2.1Case2

    Higherhorizontal

    transmissivity

    The next simulation investigates the effect of anisotropy in the background fracture

    network. In thiscasethe transmissivityo fthe horizontal fracture set was raised by two

    orders of magnitude to l x l0

    4

    m

    2

    /s (corresponding to anapertureof

    5 x l 0

    4

    m),whilethe

    vertical

    set was left at 1x10 m /s. The transmissivity of the two large fractures was kept

    at

    l x l 0

    4

    m

    2

    /s.

    This

    alteration to the

    base case

    scenario

    represents

    an introduction of

    anisotropy into the system. A

    typical field

    scenario

    that

    corresponds to this fracture

    network is horizontal fractures along consolidated sedimentary bedding planes, connected

    by

    tighter vertical fractures. Other than the above modifications the

    parameters

    for this

    simulationare thesameas provided in Table 4-1.

    This

    alteration to the background fracture network raised the

    overall

    permeability of the

    geologicunit andcausesthe

    flow

    through the system to increase by 64% over the

    base

    case, to 5.04x10

    5

    m

    3

    /s when no borehole is

    present.

    When the borehole is

    present

    at x =

    -25 m the

    flow

    through the system is

    L l O x l O

    4

    m

    3

    /s. The total

    f low

    through the system is

    higher both

    with

    the borehole and without compared to the

    base

    case. However, the

    60

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    71/142

    relative

    impact of

    adding

    the borehole in this scenario is reduced. In the

    base

    casethe

    borehole increased the total system

    flow

    by a factor of

    3.3,

    whereas in this scenario the

    borehole increased the system

    flow

    by a factor of2.2. The proportion of the total system

    flowthat

    channeled through the borehole was also less in thiscaseat 77%.

    It is expected

    that

    a

    vertical

    boreholewouldhave a more significant effect where the

    horizontalfracture transmissivities are higher than the

    vertical.

    A

    highly

    conductive

    vertical

    conduit should be more effective in this situation

    becausewith

    low

    vertical

    fracture transmissivities the competing preferential

    flow

    paths

    through the background

    network are at a disadvantage. A n yconnected flow-path through the background

    network must include someverticallow-transmissivityfractures. The reason

    that

    the

    borehole has less of a relative effect on the system

    flow

    than the

    base

    caseis not the

    anisotropy but the overallincrease in background networkconductivity. The significance

    ofthe borehole relies upon the fact

    that

    it connects two relatively hightransmissivity

    fractures and

    creates

    a preferential pathway

    that

    did not exist before. The

    greater

    the

    contrast between the background transmissivity and the major

    features

    the

    greater

    an

    impact the borehole can be expected to have.

    This

    relationship is investigated later in this

    chapter.

    Figure

    4-9 shows the breakthrough of particles at the downstream boundary for Case 2.

    The

    breakthrough time

    parameters

    are provided in Table 4-2.

    Generally,

    the behaviour of

    these

    curves closely resembles the breakthrough curves for the

    base

    case. The borehole

    has the effect of

    allowing

    contaminants to reach the downstream boundary sooner and at

    61

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    72/142

    muchhigher concentrations. The breakthrough curve for thesimulationwithout the

    borehole shows

    that

    the particle breakthrough is dispersed over a much longer time

    frame, but

    with

    lower concentrations.

    Morespecifically,

    although the borehole was

    shown

    to have less of an effect on the system

    flow

    in thissimulationvs. the

    base

    case, the

    borehole has agreatereffect on the contaminant breakthrough as measured by the median

    residence time, T 5 0 T 5 0 decreasesby a factor of 8.5 in Case 2

    with

    the inclusionof the

    borehole, butonlyby a factor of 7.8 in the

    base

    case. Thisresult is more significant

    whentaken in conjunction

    with

    the borehole's decreased effect on the

    f low

    in Case 2.

    The

    reason for this increased borehole effect on transport in Case 2 is the longer

    residence times for Case 2 without the borehole. It can be seenfromTable 4-2

    that

    Q

    s y s

    and the breakthrough times aresimilarfor Case 2 and thebase casewhen the borehole is

    present. Thisis expected,becausethe higher transmissivity horizontal fractures

    w i l l

    not

    have a large effect when the borehole ispresent. The majority of the system

    f low wil l

    take place through the borehole, the major features, and through the

    vertical

    background

    fractures

    from

    the source zone to the upper major feature. 97.5%

    o f

    the particles released

    from

    the source zone travel along this path through the borehole. However, except for

    the

    ini t ial

    breakthrough, the breakthrough times are longer for Case 2 when no borehole

    ispresent. Thisis due to theoverallvolume increase caused by the largeraperture

    horizontalfractures being introduced. Increasing the fracture transmissivity by two

    orders of magnitude results in an increase in fracture volume of 4.64 according to the

    cubiclaw (Tocb ). The total systemconductivityincreased by a factor of 1.6 as

    62

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    73/142

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    74/142

    4.2.2Case3 -Higher

    Vertical

    Transmissivity

    In

    this

    case

    the transmissivity

    o f

    the vertical fracture set was raised by two orders of

    magnitude over the

    base

    caseto

    l x l 0

    4

    m

    2

    /s, while the horizontal set was left at

    l x l O

    6

    2

    * 4 2

    m

    /s. The transmissivity

    o f

    the two large fractures was maintained at 1x10 m /s.

    Increasing the transmissivity of the vertical fracture set had a larger effect on the

    f low

    system than increasing the horizontal transmissivities in Case 2. Without the borehole,

    the total

    f low

    through the system increased by a factor of 4.8 to 1.47x10

    4

    m

    3

    /s. The

    reason for this is

    that

    in the

    base case

    the vertical background fracture set

    represents

    the

    longest constriction in the major flow-path.

    Most

    of

    the horizontal distance from the

    source zone to the downstream constant-head boundary can be traversed along one of the

    major conductive features. To reach the lowerfeatureand the exit boundary, however,

    water must travel along the vertical background fractures from the source zone to the

    upperfeatureand again between the upper and lower features. These vertical fractures

    act as the bottleneck in the

    base

    case, and increasing their transmissivities by two orders

    ofmagnitude opens this bottleneck significantly.

    When

    the vertical borehole was included in the system the total

    f low

    was 2.24x10

    4

    m

    3

    /s,

    or

    2.2 times the

    base

    casescenario

    with

    the borehole. The overall effect of the borehole

    on the

    f low

    rate

    in Case 3 was therefore an increase by a factor of 1.5 (relative to Case 3

    with

    no borehole),which

    means

    the borehole had a less significant effect

    here

    than in

    Case 2 or the

    base

    case. The

    percentage

    of the

    flow

    through the borehole was also less in

    this

    case

    at 55%. The reason for this is the overall increase in the hydraulic conductivity

    64

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    75/142

    ofthe background fracture network,whichmakes the preferential pathway created by the

    borehole less significant.

    It can be seen by Figure 4-11 though,

    that

    the borehole is stillcausing a large spike in the

    particlebreakthrough curve early in time. In fact, in Table 4-2 it can be seen

    that

    the

    earlybreakthrough

    with

    the borehole is even faster than

    that

    of Case 1. However, the

    effect of the borehole on contaminant transport, measured by the change in the median

    particle

    residence time, is

    only

    a factor of

    3.8. This

    is due to faster particle transport for

    Case 3 without the borehole compared to the

    base

    case without the borehole. The

    proportion

    of particles

    travelling

    through the borehole is reduced to 89%, because in this

    situationthere

    are several conductive alternate pathways.

    This

    effects the

    tai l

    of the

    breakthrough curve for the case

    with

    the borehole, as particles traveling through the

    background

    network pathways stilltake longer than those traveling through the borehole.

    Figure4-12 shows the lateral breakthrough distribution for Case 3. On this plot it is

    evident

    that

    the borehole is having a less significant impact on contaminant transport than

    inthe

    base

    case. For the case

    with

    the borehole the lateral distribution is less structured

    due to the larger percentage of particles

    that

    bypass the borehole and travel through the

    background

    fracture network. There is an overlap of

    particle

    exit times for the

    simulationswith

    and without the borehole

    that

    was not seen in the

    base

    case simulations.

    Even

    the particles

    that

    do travel through the borehole exhibit a greater spread in their

    residence times in Case 3.

    65

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    76/142

    Fromthe previous two simulations a number of observations can be made. It is obvious

    that

    a borehole w i l lhave a much more significant effect on the

    f low

    system whenthereis

    less choice of alternative fast-pathways for the

    flow

    andtransport. For a vertical

    borehole, thegreatestimpact w i l loccur when the background network has a lower

    verticalhydraulic conductivity, as the borehole w i l lcreatea fast vertical pathway where

    none

    existed

    previously.

    As was observed in Case 2, increasing the transmissivity of a

    fracture set

    does

    not necessarily result in faster contaminant

    transport,

    although it wil l

    result in a

    greater

    hydraulic conductivity and

    hence

    a

    greater

    f lowrate. The important

    consideration is whether any restrictions along the preferential pathways are increased.

    When

    a borehole waspresent,increasing the vertical transmissivities resulted in earlier

    breakthrough and higher concentrations. The vertical fractures were the bottleneck in the

    preferential pathway along the section between the sourceareaand the upper major

    feature. Increasing the horizontal transmissivities did not have much of an effect when

    the borehole waspresentbecausethe main pathway through the systemdoesnot

    extensively sample the horizontal background set.

    4.3

    Influence

    of MajorFeatures

    The next set of simulations investigates the effect of changing the properties ofthe two

    main

    featureslocated at z = 10 m and z = -8 m for thesamebackground network

    considered in the

    base

    case. The first twocaseslook at the effect of increasing and

    decreasing the transmissivity of the major fractures, to see how the influence of the

    borehole

    depends

    onthesepathways. The thirdcaseinvestigates the effect of a high

    contrast between the major featuresand the background by raising the transmissivity of

    66

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    77/142

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    78/142

    The

    contaminant breakthrough curves for Case 4 are

    given

    in Figure 4-13. The

    breakthrough curve for the case

    with

    the borehole reaches a higher peak and occurs

    earlier

    in time than in the

    base

    case. The time difference can be seen more

    clearly

    looking

    at the T ioand T

    5

    o values in Table 4-2. The breakthrough curve without the

    borehole occurs later i n time than in the

    base

    case, leading to anoverall greater contrast

    between the borehole and no-borehole simulations for Case 4. For the no-borehole case

    contaminant residence times are longer because the increased hydraulic conductivity

    fromthe more transmissive major features does not overcome the larger volume of the

    void

    space. The background fractures connecting the major features constrict the

    flow.

    When

    a borehole is present theconductivityis much greater due to the new pathway it

    forms between the major features.

    This

    causes contaminant travel-times to be shorter

    than in the

    base

    case. The borehole controls both the

    flow

    and transport through the

    system when it is present, channeling 99%o fthe system

    f low

    and 98.6% of the particles.

    Thelateral breakthrough distribution for Case 4givenin Figure 4-14 shows the extent

    that

    the borehole controls theshapeo fthe plume at breakthrough. The breakthrough

    pattern is very structured and reflects the flow-paths coming out of the borehole in the

    lowermajor fracture. Because the borehole contains nearly a ll of the

    f low

    in the system,

    there

    is

    limited

    interference in the pattern due to

    localized flow

    frombackground

    fractures into the major fracture.

    68

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    79/142

    4.3.2Case5 - Thresholdeffect

    In

    this

    case

    the transmissivity of the major

    features

    was lowered

    from

    the

    base case

    to the

    threshold value where they just begin to have an effect on the system.

    When

    the major

    fracture transmissivity was set at the

    same

    value as the background fractures

    there

    was no

    flow

    through the borehole and all particles traveled down one of the

    alternate

    pathways to

    the exit boundary. The transmissivity was subsequently increased

    until

    the borehole

    began to conduct

    f low.

    The threshold value for

    thus

    fracture geometry was T = 1.86xl0

    6

    m

    2

    /s.

    A tthis point the total

    flow

    through the system was found to be 8.38x10 mIswithout the

    borehole, and 8.63x10

    6

    m

    3

    /s

    with

    the borehole; a difference of3%. The

    flow

    through the

    borehole accounted for 13% of the total system

    flow.

    It can be seen

    from

    Figure 4-15

    that there

    is no appreciable difference in the

    breakthrough curve when the borehole is

    included

    in the system. No particles travel

    through the borehole

    because

    it

    does

    not

    create

    a more preferable pathway to

    those

    already existing in the background fracture network.

    Even

    though the major

    features that

    the borehole connects extend across the entire domain and have a transmissivity

    that

    is

    86%higher than theresto fthe fractures, the network is already well-connected and the

    pathway created by the borehole is not transmissive enough to channel the particles.

    It is interesting to

    note that,

    when no borehole is

    present,

    the contaminant residence times

    were longer than the

    base case

    both when the major-features' transmissivity was raised

    69

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    80/142

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    81/142

    T he flow

    and transport

    parametersfrom

    thissimulationare given in Table 4-2. The

    f low

    through the system is less than the

    base case

    both

    with

    and without the borehole. The

    relative

    effect

    of

    the borehole on the system

    flow

    is also less, increasing the

    flow

    by 13%

    compared

    with

    330% for thebasecase. The borehole stillcontrols 77%o fthe

    f low

    in

    this system. The borehole makes less of an impact in Case 6 than in thebasecase, but it

    stillcontrols the fracture

    flow

    when it ispresent.

    T he

    breakthrough of contaminants occurs much later in time when compared to the

    base

    case.

    T 5 0

    for Case 6 is 9.22x10

    5

    s compared

    with

    2.48x10

    5

    s for the

    base

    case. As can be

    seen in Figure 4-16, the borehole stillhas the effect of shortening the particle residence

    times in the fracture network, but the breakthrough is more dispersed in time and the

    concentrations are lower. The borehole had theoveralleffect of accelerating the median

    breakthrough by a factor of 1.7 in Case 6, compared

    with

    a factor of 7.8 in the

    base

    case.

    This

    caseis representative of any situation inwhichtwo or more relatively largefeatures

    are connected by a borehole

    within

    the fracture network. When the

    features

    do not

    form

    part

    of any highconductivitypathway to the source or sink the borehole has some effect

    on

    contaminant transport, but it is substantially

    diminished.

    The plot of the lateral breakthroughdistributionfor Case 6 is given in Figure 4-17. The

    particles have to

    f ind

    their way to the exit boundary through the background network

    along

    discrete fractures, making the lateral distribution of

    particle

    exit locations more

    clustered. In the

    base case

    the locations were spread across the entire width of the

    domain,

    making the plume easier to

    detect.

    In this

    case

    clustering leaves

    gaps

    in the

    71

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    82/142

    plume,

    which could

    allow

    contaminants to travel

    past

    a discrete monitoring location

    undetected. The particles exit insimilarlocations for the case

    with

    the borehole and

    without,

    but the borehole causes the particles to exit earlier in time.

    4.4

    Influence

    of

    Borehole

    DiameterandLocation

    Thenext group ofcasesconsiders the effect ofchangingthe borehole properties for the

    base

    case scenario. The effect of both the borehole's location and its diameter on the

    flow

    and transport through the fracture network are investigated. Because the fracture

    network used in this section is

    identical

    to the

    base

    case, the

    f low

    and transport properties

    without

    the borehole are the same as the

    base

    case. For this reason

    only

    the results

    with

    the borehole are compared to the

    base

    case scenario when the borehole was located at x =

    -

    25 m, y = 0 m

    with

    a diameter of 10 cm.

    4.4.1Case -Boreholeatx = 0m

    Inthebasecase scenario the borehole was located at x = -25 mwhichisonly5meters

    downstreamfrom the upper constant-head boundary and 15metersdownstream of the

    contaminant source zone. In this case the borehole was moved 25metersfurther

    downstreamfromthe

    flow

    and contaminant source zones to x = 0 m. The results of the

    simulationare summarized in Table 4-2.

    Positioning

    the borehole further downstream had verylittleeffect on the groundwater

    flow

    through the fracture network. The total

    flow

    through the system and the

    f low

    through the borehole are essentially the same as the

    base

    case.

    72

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    83/142

    Figure4-18 shows the breakthrough of contaminants at the downstream boundary for

    Case 7 plotted against the

    base

    caseresults. It can be seenfromthis plot

    that there

    is no

    significantdifference in the temporal breakthrough across the downstream boundary

    whenthe borehole is located farther awayfromthe source zone. The geometry o fthe

    systemmeans

    that

    thereis no change in the length orconductivity o fthe main pathway

    when

    the borehole is moved downstream along the centerline. There is a

    slightly

    lower

    peak concentration

    with

    the borehole at x = 0 m and a longer

    tail

    to the breakthrough

    curve. Even

    though the proportion of

    flow

    through the borehole is the

    same

    as the

    base

    case, a higherpercentageof particles bypass the borehole and travel through the

    background

    network when it is located further away. In thiscase93.9% of the particles

    traveled through the borehole compared

    with

    98.5% in the

    base

    case.

    Figure4-19 shows the lateral breakthrough distribution for Case 7. The main difference

    between this plot and the

    base case

    is

    that

    the particles are spread out more through time

    when

    the borehole is

    present.

    The front of the plume

    reaches

    the downstream boundary

    at the

    same

    time, but the

    tail

    is more spread out along the entire widtho fthe domain.

    4.4.2Case8-Boreholeatx = -35 m

    Thiscaseinvestigates the effect ofmovingthe borehole 10m closer to the contaminant

    source zone to x = -35 m. The constant head boundary along the top of the domain

    extends

    from

    x = -50 to -30 m, so in thiscasethe top o fthe borehole is actually

    intersecting the constant-head boundary. Based on the results of

    moving

    the borehole

    further away in the previous case,

    simply moving

    the borehole closer

    would only

    be

    73

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    84/142

    expected to raise peak concentrations somewhat, and not effect breakthrough times.

    However,becausethe

    high

    conductivityconduit now intersects a constant head

    boundary, the

    flow

    system and contaminant transport are

    significantly

    altered.

    In

    thissimulation92% of the groundwater

    flowenters

    the domain through the borehole.

    The

    borehole connects the upper constant head boundary to the lower major feature,

    whichin turn is connected to the downstream constant head boundary. This

    creates

    a

    highconductivitypathway through the system,significantlyincreasing the total system

    flow

    in this case. The system

    flow

    with

    the borehole is

    2.26xl0

    4

    m

    3

    /s for this scenario

    compared to 1.02xl0

    4

    m

    3

    /s for thebasecase.

    In

    previous examples the borehole acted as a connection between two fractures, so

    that

    flow

    entered the borehole at one fracture intersection and traveled under a constant

    gradient to another fracture intersection. In the

    present

    scenario, the borehole is

    connected to a constant-head boundary, andactsas a source of groundwater to allofthe

    surrounding

    intersecting fractures. The hydraulic head in the borehole is higher than

    that

    inthe surrounding fracture elements, therefore

    flow

    is out of the borehole at all fracture

    intersections and no particles canenterthe borehole.

    I f

    the borehole intersected the

    contaminant source zone then

    there

    wouldbe a large

    influx

    of fast

    moving

    contaminants

    travelingalong the major

    flow

    path, and reaching the downstream boundary at

    high

    concentrations and at an early time.

    This wouldrepresent

    a worse

    case

    scenario but is

    unlikely

    to occur in practice.

    Most

    contaminant source

    areas,

    such as a

    tailings

    pond at a

    74

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    85/142

    mine

    site,wouldbe

    lined with

    someformof an impermeable barrier, and any known

    boreholes in this area

    would

    be properly sealed

    from

    groundwater

    flow.

    T he contaminant breakthrough curve for Case 8 is provided in Figure 4-20. The borehole

    in

    this

    case

    actually slows down contaminant transport, as contaminants are pushed away

    from

    the fast pathway due to the higher

    hydraulic

    head in the borehole. Particles must

    take a longer and more tortuous route through the background network after they are

    forcedbackwards and to the lateral

    edges

    of the domain. The lateral breakthrough

    distributionin Figure 4-21 shows evidence

    ofthis.

    When the borehole ispresentthe

    majority ofparticles are stilllocated close to the domain edge, even though the

    downstream boundary is 85metersfromthe borehole location.

    4.4.3Case9 -

    Borehole

    aty = 15 m

    In thiscasethe effect oflocatingthe borehole offo fthe x-axis is investigated. The

    parametersfor thissimulationare thesameas the

    base

    case, except for the borehole

    location which

    is now at x = -25 m y = 15 m. The borehole

    sti l l

    extends

    vertically

    across

    the entire modeling domain.

    Figure4-22 shows the breakthrough ofparticles in this scenario averaged across the

    entire outflow boundary.

    Comparing

    this curve to the breakthrough

    with

    the borehole at

    y= 0 m shows

    that

    the temporal breakthrough issimilarfor both cases. The main

    difference caused by the off-center borehole location is shown in the lateral breakthrough

    distributionplot, Figure 4-23. It can be seen in this plot

    that

    the borehole's

    position

    has

    75

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    86/142

    caused the plume to deflect laterally towards the positive ydirection. The earliest

    breakthrough no longer occurs at x = 0 m but approximately at x = 15 m, the lateral

    position

    o fthe borehole. The impermeable boundary located at y = 25 m is interfering

    with

    the

    flow

    system and preventing particlesfrom movingfurther awayfromthex-axis,

    and preventing thetrueeffect of the boreholelocationbeing demonstrated. It is clear

    from

    this plot

    that

    the borehole controls the contaminant plume exit

    location,

    and in this

    scenario an effective monitoring network design

    would

    need to

    take

    into account the

    influence

    of the borehole. 96.4%o fthe particles travel through the borehole,whichis

    less than the

    base case

    scenario, but

    still

    enough to influence the downstreamstructureof

    the plume. The behaviour described above has implicationsfor the design of detection

    monitoringnetworks,whichare discussed in Chapter 5.

    4.4.4Case10 -

    Influence

    ofBoreholeDiameter

    Thenext set ofsimulationstestthe influence of the borehole diameter on the contaminant

    transportthrough the

    base

    casenetwork. The borehole is located at x = -25 m, as in the

    base

    case. The diameter was set at 2 cm, 5 cm, 10 cm

    (base

    case)and 20 cm, and the

    flow

    andtransportmodeled. A summary of the results o fthe

    individual

    simulations is

    given

    in Table 4-2.

    Thecontaminant breakthrough curves for the different borehole diameters are given in

    Figure4-24. It can be seenfromthis plot

    that

    the larger the borehole, the longer

    contaminantstaketo reach the downstream boundary. The peak concentration varies

    between the different runs, but is l ikelyrelated more to the random variations between

    76

  • 8/12/2019 ubc_2000-0351

    87/142

    runs due to the random dispersion process, than to any significant

    physical

    phenomenon.

    The

    peak concentration and the

    tail

    of the breakthrough curve are related to the

    proportion ofparticles

    that

    travel through the borehole, whereas the nose of the

    breakthrough curvedependsmore on the borehole properties.

    Figure4-25 shows the total system

    flowrate

    and the mean contaminant breakthrough

    time plotted against the borehole diameter. The

    f lowrate

    varieslinearly

    with

    the

    borehole diameter over this range,whichmeans thereis a linear increase in the total

    hydraulic conductivity of

    the system. The interesting behaviour shown on this plot is

    that

    the median contaminant residence time also increases

    with

    borehole diameter. Intuitively

    one

    would

    expect

    that

    a more conductive system

    would

    result in shorter residence times.

    However,

    while

    the residence time is proportional to the

    flowrate,

    it is inversely

    proportional

    to the conductingvolume. For the geometry considered here, the increased

    volumeof a larger borehole outweighs the increasedconductivity,resulting in longer

    residence times. In effect, when

    there

    are constrictions in the main

    f low

    path a larger

    borehole

    w i l l

    slowdown contaminant transport and act more

    like

    a

    holding

    tank than a

    fast conduit.

    4.5Case

    11 - Variable

    Network

    with

    No Major

    Features

    In

    previous studies of the effect of abandoned boreholes in porous media the borehole

    connected two aquifers across a

    relatively

    impermeable aquitard (Lacombe et

    al.,

    1995;

    A v c i ,

    1994). Ahydraulicgradient was established across the aquitard due to either a

    pumping

    or injection

    w e l l

    or natural hydraulic head differences between the two aquifers.

    77

  • 8/12/2019 ub