Typographic Guide
-
Upload
danielle-self -
Category
Documents
-
view
236 -
download
4
description
Transcript of Typographic Guide
!
everything you need to know and more.
Typographyguide
1
6 X-Height
14 Hyphenation Rules
21 Alignment
26 Justification
34 Combining Typefaces
40 Quotes, Apostrophes and Dashes
50 Special Characters
52 Bullets
56 Numerals / Figures
60 Small Caps
64 Paragraph Breaks
76 Headers, Subheads and Crossheads
84 Captions and Notes
88 Font Specs
2
• Use only one space between sentences • Use real quotation marks • Use real
apostrophes • Make sure the apostrophes are where they belong • Hang the punc-
tuation off the aligned edge • Use en or em dashes, use consistently • Kern all
headlines where necessary • Never use the spacebar to align text, always set tabs
and use the tab key • Leave no widows or orphans • Avoid more than 3 hyphen-
ations in a row • Avoid too many hyphenations in any paragraph • Avoid hyphenat-
ing or line brakes of names and proper nouns • Leave a least 2 characters on the
line and 3 following • Avoid beginning consecutive lines with the same word
• Avoid ending consecutive lines with the same word • Avoid ending lines with the
words: the, of, at, a, by.. • Never hyphenate a words in a headline and avoid hy-
phenation in a callout • Never justify the text on a short line • Keep the word spac-
ing consistent • Tighten up the leading in lines with all caps or with few ascenders
and descenders • Use a one-em first-line indent on all indented paragraphs •
Adjust the spacing between paragraphs • Either indent the first line of paragraphs
or add extra space between them – not both • Use a decimal or right-aligned tab
for the numbers in numbered paragraphs • Never have one line in a paragraph
in the column or following • Never combine two serif fonts on one page • Rarely
combine two sans serif fonts on one page • Rarely combine more than three type-
faces on one page • Use the special characters whenever necessary, including
super- and subscript • Spend the time to create nice fraction or chose a font that
has fractions • If a correctly spelled word needs an accent mark, use it.
3
Readability and Legibility are two key elements of printed text
that typographer strive to maximize. Readability extended
amount of text – such as an article, book, or annual report –
is easy to read. Legibility refers to whether an refers to whether
a short burst of text – such as a headline catalog listing, or stop
sign – is instantly recognizable.
Readability
There are several factors that determine
whether a text is readable. When decid-
ing what typeface should be used for
a job, consideration should be given
to the typeface and its x-height. It is im-
portant to understand how a block of text
can express a message through its tex-
ture/color, therefore suiting a particular
design solution. Fonts set in the same
size, same leading and column width
will produce varying degrees of “color”.
In typography, color can also describe
the balance between black and white
on the page of text. A typeface’s color is
determined by stroke width, x-height,
character width and serif styles.
4
legibility
How will it be read?
As a designer, if you are only asked to make the text readable on the page the following questions should be asked:
Who is going to read it?
• Someone that wants to read it?
• Someone that has to read it?
• Quickly
• In passing
• Focused
• Near
• Far
!
5
6
X height
7
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were charac-terized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his empha-sis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, origi-nality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and move-ment. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-
• mrs eaves (Roman) 9/11
• serif
• Zuzana Licko
• TYPE COLOR
• univers (55 Roman) 9/11
• Sans Serif : neo-grotesque
• Adrian Frutiger
• Tall x-height : short ascenders
Xxhg Xxhg
8
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were charac-terized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudia-tion of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruc-tion of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on dis-carding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glori-fied contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were character-ized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new tech-nology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
• GIll Sans (Regular) 9/11
• Sans Serif : Humanist
• Eric Gill
• Slight contrast in stroke width : Light color
• DIN (Regular) 9/11
• Sans Serif
• Linotype
• Geometric : Mono weight : Dark color
Xxhg Xxhg
9
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrel-evant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and con-flict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrel-evant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cul-tural institutions as museums and libraries.
• Memphis (Light) 9/11
• Slab Serif
• Rudolf Weiss
• Narrow : Tall X-height : Light color
• Memphis (Medium) 9/11
• Slab Serif
• Rudolf Weiss
• Narrow : Tall X-height : Dark color
Xxhg Xxhg
10
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and inno-vation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and con-flict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel-ebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several succes-sive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
• Helvetica Neue (Regular) 9/11
• Sans Serif : Grotesque
• Max Medinger
• Mono weight : Short ascenders & descenders
• Futura (Medium) 9/11
• Sans Serif : Geometric
• Paul Renner
• Pointed apex : Ascenders are taller than capitals
Xxhg Xxhg
11
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and move-ment. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social.
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were charac-terized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
• Interstate (Regular) 9/11
• Sans Serif : Grotesque
• Tobias Frere-Jones
• Wide spacing : Short ascenders & descenders
• Bembo (Regular) 9/11
• Old Style Humanist
• Stanley Morrison
• Small x-height : wide character width
XxhgXxhg
12
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his empha-sis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, origi-nality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and move-ment. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel-ebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and soci-ety. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of sev-eral successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence
• Serifa (55 Roman) 9/11
• Slab Serif
• Adrian Frutiger
• Humanist qualities : Highly readable
• Bauer Bodoni (Roman) 9/11
• Modern
• Heinrich Jost
• Extreme stroke contrast : Hairline serifs
Xxhg Xxhg
13
HYPHEN-In unjustified text, the text
block is set with normal letter
and word spacing. Because of
the even word spacing the text
will have an even texture – no
large spaces between words.
The lines will naturally vary
in length. A ragged text block
can integrate with the layout
and add visual interest to the
page. The difficulty is making
the ragged edge have a
pleasing silhouette.
When the first line in the text is longer than the
second, it becomes separate from the layout
and creates a box-like shape. This destroys one
of the advantages of unjustified text. The ragged
edge needs to have a life, but a narrow column
can be less active. Another advantage to ragged
text is less hyphenation is needed. Therefore,
names, dates or words which are normally read
together can stay together.
14
• how the text is read avoid widows (one word on the last line of a paragraph)
• avoid hyphenating or line brakes of names and proper nouns
• leave a least 2 characters on the line and 3 following
• avoid beginning consecutive lines with the same word
• avoid ending consecutive lines with the same word
• avoid ending lines with the words: the, of, at, a, by..
• never hyphenate a words in a headline and avoid hyphenation in a callout
ATION rules
15
Never leave widows and orphans bereft on the page. Avoid both of these situations. If you have editing privileges, rewrite the copy, or at least add or delete a word or two. Sometimes you can remove spacing from the letters, words, or lines, depending on which program you’re working in. Sometimes widening a margin just a hair will do it. But it must be done.
Widows and orphans on a page are wrong.!
16
Widows and orphans on a page are wrong.
WidowWhen a paragraph ends and
leaves fewer than seven char-
acters (not words, characters)
on the last line, that line is
called a widow. Worse than
leaving one word at the end of
a line is leaving part of a word,
the other part being para-
phrased on the line above.
OrphanWhen the last line of a paragraph, be it ever so long, won’t fit at
the bottom of a column and must end itself at the top of the next
column, that is an orphan. ALWAYS correct this.
RiversIn typography, rivers, or rivers of white, are visu-
ally unattractive gaps appearing to run down a
paragraph of text. They can occur with any spac-
ing, though they are most noticeable with wide
word spaces caused by either full text justifica-
tion or monospaced fonts.
17
Casing AdderBatHersey borsch-boil starry a boarder borsch boil gam plate lung, lung a gore in-ner ladle wan-hearse torn coiled Mutt-fill. Mutt-fill worsen mush of- fer torn, butted hatter putty guy borsch-boil tame, an off oiler pliers honor tame, door moist cerebrated worse Cas-ing. Casing worsted sickened basement, any hatter betting orphanage off .526 (fife toe sex). Casing worse gut lurking an furry poplar - spatially wetter gull coiled Any-bally. Any-bally worse Casing’s sweat-hard, any harpy cobble wandered toe gat merit, bought Casing worse toe pore tow becalm Any-bally’s horsebarn. (Boil pliers honor Mutt-fill tame dint gat mush offer celery; infect, day gut nosing atoll.) Bought less gat earn wetterst-arry.
Look for bad line breaks throughout every line of body copy. Here are several examples of the sorts of things to looks for:
Justify the headline so it stays in the line
Use a line break (shift return) to bump “a” down tothe next line, where it fits very nicely
Kern the line a tiny bit to bring the rest of the word up
Never hyphenate a person’s name. I have to go up a few lines, bump “off” down, which bumped the other line endings down.
[Above] also took care of the unappropriate widown here.
There is plenty of room to squeeze “bought” onthis line, perhaps by kerning the line a tiny bit.
“Horsebarn” is a good long word that could be hyphenated; type a dischy. Bet-ter yet, with “bought” moved up, it gave enough room to move “horsebarn” up. If now, try opening th text block or text box a wee bit.
Edit: to get rid of that terrible widow, exchange a short word for a long word
Type a dischy in front of the word to bump it down.
18
Hersey borsch-boil starry a boarder borsch boil gam plate lung, lung a gore inner ladle wan-hearse torn coiled Mutt-fill. Mutt-fill worsen mush offer torn, butted hatter putty guy borsch-boil tame, an off oiler pliers honor tame, door moist cerebrated worse Casing. Casing worsted sick-ened basement, any hatter betting orphanage off .526 (fife toe sex). Casing worse gut lurking an furry poplar —spatially wetter gull coiled Any-bally. Any-bally worse Casing’s sweat-hard, any harpy cobble wandered toe gat merit, bought Casing worse tow pore toe becalm Any-bally’s horse-barn. (Boil pliers honor Mutt-fill tame dint gat mush offer celery; infect, day gut nosing atoll.) Bought less gat earn wetter starry.
Casing Adder Bat
Of course, do this only on final copy, after all editing has been done.!
19
Don’t hyphenate headlines. Don’t leave widows (very short last lines) in headlines.
Fix it either way,
Don Quixote de la Man-cha
Professor and The-rapist to Lecture
Don’t Lose Your SelfRespect
Man Walks Barefoot Across Bay Bridge
Man Walks Barefoot Across Bay Bridge
Man Walks Barefoot Across Bay Bridge
That’s a law
Fix it.
Watch where the first line of a two-line headline ends - does it or rewrite!
20
Right and wrong do not exist in graphic design. There is only effective and non-effective communication. — Peter Bilak, Illegibility
As with all layouts, alignment depends on the purpose of the piece, the audience and its expectations, the fonts, the margins and white space, and other elements on the page. The most appropriate choice is the alignment that works for that particu-lar design. No matter what alignment you use, remember to pay close attention to hyphenation and word/character spacing as well to insure that your text is as read-able as possible. There will undoubtedly be well-meaning friends, business associ-ates, clients, and others who will question your choices. Be prepared to explain why you chose the alignment you did and be prepared to change it (and make necessary adjustments to keep it looking good) if the person with final approval still insists on something different.
Man Walks Barefoot Across Bay Bridge
21
If someone insists that fully justified text is better than left-aligned text...
If someone else tells you that left-aligned text is better than justified text...
22
If they are both wrong, then what’s right? Alignment is only a small piece of the puzzle. What works for one design might be totally inappropriate for another layout. As with all layouts, it depends on the purpose of the piece, the audience and its expectations, the fonts, the margins and white space, and other elements on the page. The most appropriate choice is the alignment that works for that particular design.
tell them they are wrong.!
23
Traditionally many books, newsletters, and newspapers use
full-justification as a means of packing as much informa-
tion onto the page as possible to cut down on the number of
pages needed. While the alignment was chosen out of necessity,
it has become so familiar to us that those same types of publi-
cations set in left-aligned text would look odd, even unpleasant.
You may find that fully-justified text is anecessity either due to space constraints or expectations of the auhdience. If possible though, try to break up dense blocks of texts with ample subheadings, margins, or graphics.
• Often considered more formal, bur less friendly than
left-aligned text.
• Usually allows for more characters per line, packing more
into the same amount of space (than the same text set left-
aligned).
• May require extra attention to word and character spacing
and hyphenation to avoid unsightly rivers of white space
running through the text.
• May be more familiar to readers in some types of publica
tions, such as books and newspapers.
• Some people are naturally drawn to the “neatness” of text
that lines up perfectly on the left and right.
Justified text
24
• Often considered more informal, friend-
lier than justified text.
• The ragged right edge adds an element
of white space.
• May require extra attention to hyphen-
ation to keep right margin from being too
ragged.
• Generally type set left-aligned is easier
to work with (i.e. requires less time, at-
tention, and tweaking from the designer
to make it look good).
There is nothing inherently
wrong with centered text.
As with ragged right or fully-
justified text alignment, what
works for one design might be
totally inappropriate for another
layout. There are simply fewer
situations where centered text
is appropriate. When in doubt,
don’t center it.
Left-alignedragged right
Centered text
25
is if your type is small enough and your line is long enough, as in
books where the text goes all the way across the page.!The only time you can safely get away with
justifying text
26
When your work comes out of the printer turn it upside down
and squint at it.
27
If your line is shorter, as in newsletter, or if you don’t have many words on the line, than as the type aligns to the margins the words space themselves to accommodate it. It usually looks awkward.
Justify text only if the line is long enough
to prevent awkward and inconsistent
word spacing.
You’ve seen newspaper columns where all text is justified, often with a word stretching all the way
across the column, or a little word on either side of the column with a big gap in the middle. Gross.
But that’s what can happen with justified type. When you do it, the effect might not be as radical as
the newspaper column, but if your lines are relatively short, you will inevitably end up with uncomfort-
able gaps in some lines, while other lines will be all squished together.
28
Here is a general guideline for determining if your line length
is long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in
picas should be about twice the point size of the type; that is, if the
type you are using is 12 point, the line length should be at least 24
picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the number of picas by
6, as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on
an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to justify it, and 18-point
type should be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most
programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up
on it. But there has been a great deal of research done on
readability (how easy something is to read) and it shoes
that those disruptive, inconsistent gaps between the words
inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep
your eyes open as you look at professionally printed work
(magazines, newsletters, annual reports, journals) and
you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align type on the
left and leave the right ragged.
80 : 100 : 130
Here is a general guideline for determining if your line length
is long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in
picas should be about twice the point size of the type; that is,
if the type you are using is 12 point, the line length should be
at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the number
of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type
should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to justify
it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The
rulers in most programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
65 : 150 : 400Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up
on it. But there has been a great deal of research done
on readability (how easy something is to read) and it
shoes that those disruptive, inconsistent gaps between
the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look
dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look at professionally
printed work (magazines, newsletters, annual reports,
journals) and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to
align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
This is an example of a typical justification setting. It provides easy readability and isn’t too distracting
There is slightly too much space between the words in this example. It remains readable but doesn’t flow very nicely.
29
40 : 80 : 120
Here is a general guideline for determining if your line length is long
enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in picas should
be about twice the point size of the type; that is, if the type you are
using is 12 point, the line length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is
4 inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas
per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches)
before you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-pica
line (6 inches). The rulers in most programs can be changed to picas,
if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up on
it. But there has been a great deal of research done on read-
ability (how easy something is to read) and it shoes that those
disruptive, inconsistent gaps between the words inhibit the
flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep your eyes
open as you look at professionally printed work (magazines,
newsletters, annual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s
a very strong trend to align type on the left and leave the
Here is a general guideline for determining if your line length is
long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in picas
should be about twice the point size of the type; that is, if the type
you are using is 12 point, the line length should be at least 24 picas
(24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6, as there
are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an 18-pica
line (3 inches) before you try to justify it, and 18-point type should
be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most programs can be
changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up on it.
But there has been a great deal of research done on readabil-
ity (how easy something is to read) and it shoes that those
disruptive, inconsistent gaps between the words inhibit the
flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep your eyes
open as you look at professionally printed work (magazines,
newsletters, annual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s
a very strong trend to align type on the left and leave the
The text in this example flows nicely and is easy to read. It is a very sucessful example, however there could be slightly more space beween the words, the san-serif font works better than the serif.
This example is much too tight. Readability is compromised.
30
200 : 250 : 300
Here is a general guideline for determining if your line length
is long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in
picas should be about twice the point size of the type; that is,
if the type you are using is 12 point, the line length should be
at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the number
of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type
should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to justify
it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The
rulers in most programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up
on it. But there has been a great deal of research done
on readability (how easy something is to read) and it
shoes that those disruptive, inconsistent gaps between
the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look
dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look at professionally
printed work (magazines, newsletters, annual reports,
journals) and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to
align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
Here is a general guideline for determining if your line
length is long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the
line length in picas should be about twice the point size
of the type; that is, if the type you are using is 12 point,
the line length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4
inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6, as there are
6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an 18-
pica line (3 inches) before you try to justify it, and 18-point
type should be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in
most programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we
grew up on it. But there has been a great deal of
research done on readability (how easy something is
to read) and it shoes that those disruptive, incon-
sistent gaps between the words inhibit the flow of
reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep your eyes
open as you look at professionally printed work
(magazines, newsletters, annual reports, journals)
and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align
type on the left and leave the right ragged.
There is too much space between the words in this example. It not only looks awkward but the gaps created make it hard to read.
This is another decent example. It could be slightly tighter, however.
31
280 : 300 : 450
Here is a general guideline for determining if your line length is long
enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in picas should
be about twice the point size of the type; that is, if the type you are
using is 12 point, the line length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is
4 inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas
per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches)
before you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-pica
line (6 inches). The rulers in most programs can be changed to picas,
if you like.
20 : 35 : 45Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up
on it. But there has been a great deal of research done on
readability (how easy something is to read) and it shoes that those
disruptive, inconsistent gaps between the words inhibit the
flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep your eyes
open as you look at professionally printed work (magazines,
newsletters, annual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s
a very strong trend to align type on the left and leave the
Here is a general guideline for determining if your
line length is long enough to satisfactorily justify the
text: the line length in picas should be about twice
the point size of the type; that is, if the type you are
using is 12 point, the line length should be at least
24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the number
of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus
9-point type should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches)
before you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be
on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most pro-
Justified text was the style for many years-we
grew up on it. But there has been a great
deal of research done on readability (how easy
something is to read) and it shoes that those
disruptive, inconsistent gaps between the words
inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look
dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look at
professionally printed work (magazines, newsletters,
annual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s a
very strong trend to align type on the left and
This is one of the worst examples. The gaps created are awful. They create more of a block of random words rather than a cohe-sive text box
There isn’t enough word spacing in this example, creating run-on sentences and making it difficult to read.
32
25 : 200 : 1000
Here is a general guideline for determining if your
line length is long enough to satisfactorily justi-
fy the text: the line length in picas should be about twice
the point size of the type; that is, if the type you are
using is 12 point, the line length should be at least 24 picas
(24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6, as
there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an
18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to justify it, and 18-point
type should be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most
100 : 101 : 260Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up
on it. But there has been a great deal of research done on
readability (how easy something
is to read) and it shoes that those
disruptive, inconsistent gaps between the words in-
hibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb.
Keep your eyes open as you look at profession-
ally printed work (magazines, newsletters, an-
Here is a general guideline for determining if your line length
is long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length
in picas should be about twice the point size of the type; that
is, if the type you are using is 12 point, the line length should
be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the
number of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus
9-point type should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before
you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-pica
line (6 inches). The rulers in most programs can be changed
to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew
up on it. But there has been a great deal of research
done on readability (how easy something is to read)
and it shoes that those disruptive, inconsistent gaps
between the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides,
they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look at
professionally printed work (magazines, newsletters,
annual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s a very
strong trend to align type on the left and leave the
This example is sucessful. The spacing could be slightly tighter but they flow nicely.
The lines spaces in this example a extremely awkward and inconsistent.
33
When combining serif and sans serif text fonts, one shroud
try and match the characteristics of form and type color: pro-
portion, x-heights. Keep an eye on the characteristic shapes
of the letterform. A well designed page contains no more than
two different typefaces or four different type variations such
as type size and bold or italic style.
Using 2 different serif fonts or 2 different sans serifs fonts in the same composition is never a good idea.
combiningtypefaces
Although there is not recipe
there is a place to start:!
34
A PROLOGUE TO FUTURISM: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
WORDS IN LIBERTY
• Futura Extra Bold 14/16
• Futura Extra Bold 10/12
• Mrs Eaves 9/12
aa BB ee GG gg
Very good example of a large contrast
between a serif body copy font and
san-serif headline font. Futura and Mrs
Eaves work well together and provide an
easily readable contrast.
Geometric Sans / New Transitional
A Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrat-ing change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected tradi-tions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
WORDS IN LIBERTY
• Helvetica Medium 14/16
• Helvetica Medium 9/12
• Memphis Light 8/12
aa BB ee GG gg
Both the Helvetica and Memphic font
are mono weight, having a serif font
with varying stroke widths might have
provided more of a contrast.
Slab Serif / Humanist Sans
35
A Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and in-novation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glori-fied the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
WORDS IN LIBERTY
• Gill Sans Bold 14/16
• Gill Sans Bold Italic 10/12
• Bodoni Book 9/12
aa BB ee GG gg
A good combination of a bold typeface
with a serif font. Gill Sans stroke had to
be bumped up to bold in order to con-
trast more with the Bodoni Book font.
Old Style / Humanist Sans
A Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-
paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism,
coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the
past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified
contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were character-
ized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new
technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and
called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural
institutions as museums and libraries.
WORDS IN LIBERTY
• Trade Gothic Medium 14/16
• Trade Gothic Bold 10/12
• Garamond 9/12
aa BB ee GG gg
There is already a large difference in
the Medium and Bold font in the type-
face of Trade Gothic. The contrast is
extremely evident in this example.
Old Style / Grotesque Sans
36
A PROLOGUE TO FUTURISM: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several succes-sive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technol-ogy of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted vio-lence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
WORDS IN LIBERTY
• Furtura Bold 14/16
• Futura Bold 10/12
• Adobe Caslon 9/12
aa BB ee GG gg
Futura Bold had a commanding
presence in this example, when paired
with Caslon. Caslon or the subhead
could even be slightly smaller to add
more emphasis
Traditional / Geometric Sans
A PROLOGUE TO FUTURISM: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909,
when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor
Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his em-
phasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and
celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected
traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes,
the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several suc-
cessive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new tech-
nology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted
violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social,
and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and
libraries.
WORDS IN LIBERTY
• Frutiger Bold 14/16
• Frutiger Bold 9/12
• Belizio 7/12
aa BB ee GG gg
The san-serif font, Frutiger, with the
serif font, Belizio, pair nicely together.
Nothing in this example is overly loud
but still provides enough of a contrast.
Traditional / Humanist Sans
37
A Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrat-ing change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automo-bile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
WORDS IN LIBERTY
• Helvetica Bold 14/16
• Helvetica 12/12
• Mrs Eaves 9/12
aa BB ee GG gg
The verticalness of Helvetica’s letter
forms and the horizontalness of Mrs
Eaves’ letterforms offer an interesting
contrast in letter spacing.
Grotesque / Transitional
A Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and in-novation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glori-fied the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
WORDS IN LIBERTY
• Furtura Bold 14/16
• Futura Bold 9/12
• Bauer Bodoni 9/12
aa BB ee GG gg
Futura bold’s commanding presence
is evident when paired with the serif,
Bauer Bodoni. The two work well to-
gether providing a nice contrast, without
competing for attention.
Geometric Sans / Modern
38
A Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-
paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The
name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the
static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and so-
ciety. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant
themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive
actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automo-
bile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for
the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such
cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
WORDS IN LIBERTY
• Univers Condensed 14/16
• Univers Light Condensed 10/12
• Didot Regular 7/12
aa BB ee GG gg
Univers condensed is a mono-weight
font and when paired with Didot Regular
that has a large variety of stroke weight,
the contrast is dynamic.
Grotesque Sans / Modern
A Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Mari-netti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cul-tural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions
WORDS IN LIBERTY
• Futura Bold 14/16
• Futura Bold 10/12
• Rockwell 9/12
aa BB ee GG gg
This is an interesting example of a
bold, san-serif font paired with a heavily
weighted serif. While they both have
heavey stroke widths it is nice to see
the contrast soley in the serif.
Slab Serif / Geometric Sans
39
Quotes Apostrophies!
Dashes
It is necessary to know how to set them yourself because
sometimes the software doesn’t do it or does it wrong.
40
Use real quotation marks – never those grotesque generic marks that actually symbolize ditto/inch or foot marks: use “and” – not “and”.
Bridge Clearance 16' 7"The young man stood 6' 2"The length of the wall is 153'9"
Most software applications will convert the typewriter quotes
to the real quotes for you automatically as you type. Check
the preferences for your application – you’ll find a check box
to tell your application to automatically set something like
“typographer’s quotes,” “smart quotes,” or “curly quotes.”
Then as you type using the standard ditto key (“), the software
will set the correct quotation marks for you.
Opening double quote: “ Type: Option [
Closing double quote: ” Type: Option Shift [
Opening single quote: ‘ Type: Option ]
Closing single quote: ’ Type: Option Shift ]
Dashes
41
As an aside, people often are confused about where the
apostrophe belongs. There are a couple of rules that work very well.
In a phrase such as House o’ Fashion, the
apostrophe takes the place of the f. There is
not earthly reason for an apostrophe to be set
before the o.
In a phrase such as Gone Fishin’ the same
pattern is followed — the g is missing.
42
Apostrophe: ’ option shift ]!For omission of letters: In a phrase such as Rock ’n’ Roll, there should be an apostrophe before and after the n, because the a and the d are both left out. And don’t turn the first apostrophe around — just because it appears in front of the letter does not mean you need to use the opposite single quote. An apostrophe is still the appropri-ate mark (not ‘n’).
In a date when part of the year is left out, an apostrophe
needs to indicate the missing year. In the 80s would mean
the temperature; In the ’80s would mean the decade. (Notice
there is no apostrophe before the s! Why would there be? It is
not possessive, nor is it a contraction — it is simply plural.
43
For possessives: Turn the phrase around. The apostrophe will be placed after whatever word you end up with. For example, in the phrase the boys’ camp, to know where to place the apostrophe say to yourself, “The camp belongs to the boys.” The phrase the boy’s camp says “The camp belongs to the boy.”
“The big exception to this is “its.” “Its” used as a possessive
never has an apostrophe! The word it only has an apostrophe
as a contraction. It may be easier to remember if you recall
that yours, hers, and his don’t use apostrophes — and neither
should its.
“it’s” always means “it is” or “it has.” Always.!
44
For contractions: The apostrophe replaces the missing letter. For example: your’re always means you are; the apostrophe is replacing the a from are. That’s an easy way to distinguish it from your as in your house and to make sure you don’t say: Your going to the store.
As previously noted, it’s means “it is”; the apostrophe is
indicating where the i is left out. Don’t means “do not”; the
apostrophe is indicating where the o is left out.
45
Everyone knows what a hyphens is—that tiny little dash that belongs in some words, like mother-in-law, or in phone numbers. It’s also used to break a word at the end of a line, of course.
hyphen -en dash –em dash —
You might have been taught to use a double hyphen to
indicate a dash, like so : -- . This is a typewriter convention
because typewriters didn’t have the real dash used in profes-
sional typesetting. On a Mac, no one needs to use the double
hyphen—we have a professional em dash, the long one, such
as you see in this sentence. We also have an en dash, which
is a little shorter than the em dash.
Never use two
hyphens instead of a dash.
Use hyphens, en dashes, and em
dashes appropriately.
46
A hyphen is one third of the em rule and is used to link words. It serves as a
compound modifier where two words become one, such as x-height. A hyphen is
also used to break works at syllables in text blocks.
47
An en dash is half of the em rule (the width of a capital N) and is used between words that indicate a duration, such as time or months or years. Use it where you might otherwise use the word “to.”
In a page layout application, the en dash can be used with a
thin space on either side of it. If you want you can kern it so
it is not a full space.
October – December6:30 – 8:45 A.M.4 – 6 years of age
To type an en dash
en dash – Option Hyphen
hold the Option key down, then tap the
hyphen key
48
The em dash is twice as long as the en dash—it’s about the size of a capital letter M in whatever size and typeface you’re using at the moment. This dash is often used in place of a colon or parentheses, or it might indicate an abrupt change in thought, or it’s used in a spot where a period is too strong and a comma is too weak.
To type an em dash
em dash — Shift Option Hyphen
hold the Shift and Option keys down, then tap
the hyphen key.
Our equivalent on the typewriter was the double hyphen, but
now we have a real em dash. Using two hyphens (or worse,
one) where there should be an em dash makes your look very
unprofessional.
When using an—no space is used on
either side.
49
and accent marks. On the following pages are the key combinations for just about every accent you might need.
Remember, to set an accent mark over a letter,
press the Option key, let go, and then letter, then
press the letter you want under it.
´ Option e` Option ~ (upper-left or next to the Spacebar)¨ Option u˜ Option nˆ Option i
!The following is a list of the most often-used
special characters
50
“ Option [ opening double quote
” Option Shift [ closing double quote
‘ Option ] opening single quote
’ Option Shift ] closing single quote; apostrophe
– Option Hyphen en dash
— Option Shift Hyphen em dash
… Option ; ellipsis (this character can’t be separated at the end of a line as
three periods can)
• Option 8 bullet (easy way to remember as it’s the asterisk key)
fi Option Shift 5 ligature of f and i
fl Option Shift 6 ligature of f and l
© Option g
™ Option 2
® Option r
° Option Shift 8 degree symbol (e.g., 102°F)
¢ Option $
€ Option Shift 2 Euro symbol
⁄ Option Shift 1 (one) fraction bar (this doesn’t descend below the line like
the slash does)
¡ Option 1 (one)
¿ Option Shift ?
£ Option 3
ç Option c
Ç Option Shift c
51
bullet, of course !52
Simply put, a bullet is a large dot used to draw attention to each item in a list or series. The items can be single words, phrases, sentences or para-graphs. Even if you use the bullet that is part of your font, don’t automatically assume it’s the right size: it might need to be altered in scale or position to make it look balanced next to the text.
Bullets should be centered on either the cap height or x-
height, depending on the nature of your copy. If all of your
items begin with a cap, center the bullet on the cap, or a bit
lower so it balances with the negative spaces created by the
lowercase. If your items all begin with lowercase characters,
center the bullets on the x-height. Insert some space after
the bullet to avoid crowding.
The preferred way to align bullets is with the left margin. You
can also have the bullets overhang the margin, and keep all
your text aligned with the left margin. Whichever style you
choose, your listing will look best if items that run more than
one line are indented so that the copy aligns with itself, and
not with the bullet on the first line.
53
Another occasion to take advantage of the baseline shift feature is when using dingbats or ornaments.
Suppose you have a list of items and you
really want to use a fancy dingbat from the
Zapf Dingbats font, instead of using the boring
ol’ round bullet (or—heaven forbid—a hyphen).
But the Zapf Dingbat character is too big.
If you reduce its size, the dingbat is too low
because the character is still sitting on the
baseline. So select the character and shift it
up above the baseline.
54
Pick any three adjectives that
describe yourself:
• lovely
• surly
• ghastly
• womanly
• saintly
• ungodly
• stately
Pick any three adjectives that
describe yourself:
v lovely
a surly
t ghastly
, womanly
3 saintly
5 ungodly
V stately
Pick any three adjectives that
describe yourself:
, lovely
, surly
, ghastly
, womanly
, saintly
, ungodly
, stately
choose a dingbat instead of the dumb ol’bullet (the bullet is Option 8)
You have lots of dingbats to choose from, but they are usually too big.
You can decrease the point size of the bullet, but then it sits too low.
Raise the dingbat higher off the baseline.
Pick any three adjectives that
describe yourself:, lovely, surly, ghastly, womanly, saintly, ungodly, stately
To be more creative, substitute symbols or ding-bats for the actual bullets. Try squares, triangles or check marks (just not all at once, as shown in the illustration!). Keep these simple and in proportion with the rest of your text.
55
56
It’s well worth the extra effort to track down and obtain
typefaces with oldstyle numerals
Numerals
!Figures
57
Oldstyle figures are a style of numeral which approximate lowercase letterforms by having an x-height and varying ascenders and descend-ers. They are considerably different from the more common “lining” (or “aligning”) figures which are all-cap height and typically monospaced in text faces so that they line up vertically on charts. Oldstyle figures have more of a traditional,
classic look. They are only available for certain
typefaces, sometimes as the regular numerals
in a font, but more often within a supplemen-
tary or expert font. The figures are proportion-
ately spaced, eliminating the white spaces that
result from monospaced lining figures, espe-
cially around the numeral one.
Oldstyle figures are very useful and quite
beautiful when set within text. Unlike lining
figures, they blend in without disturbing the
color of the body copy. They also work well
in headlines since they’re not as intrusive
as lining figures. In fact, many people prefer
them overall for most uses except charts and
tables. It’s well worth the extra effort to track
down and obtain typefaces with oldstyle
numerals; the fonts that contain them might
well become some of your favorites.
58
Notice how large and clunky these numbers appear:
Notice how beautifully these numbers blend into the text:
Dear John, please call me at 438-9762 at 3:00 to discuss marriage.Or write me at Route 916, zip code 87505
Dear John, please call me at 438-9762 at 3:00 to discuss marriage.Or write me at Route 916, zip code 87505
59
60
There are quite a few font families that include “true-drawn” small caps—letterforms that have been redesigned to match the proportions and thicknesses of the uppercase. These families are often called “experts” sets or perhaps “small cap” sets (see Chapter 8).
The result is a smooth, uniform, undisturbing
tone throughout the text.
Small!
Caps
61
If you set acronyms in regular all caps, their visual presence is unnecessarily overwhelming. One standard and practical place to use small caps is in acronyms such as FBI, NCR, CBS, or SIMM.
Harriet, an FBI agent, turned on CNN to get the dirt on the CIA before going to bed at 9:30 P.M.
Harriet, an FBI agent, turned on CNN to get the dirt on the CIA before going to bed at 9:30 P.M.
The capital letters in the middle of the sentence call too much attention to themselves.
Notice how the small caps blend in with the text. The capital letters for P.M. are much too
large — the abbreviation is not that important.
The weight of the computer-drawn small caps is thinner than the weight of the regular initial
(first letter) caps. Typeface is Eurostile.
The Wicked Are Very Weary.
Traditionally, “A.M.” and “P.M.” are set with
small caps. If you were taught on a typewrit-
er (of if you were taught on a keyboard by
someone who was taught on a typewriter),
you probably learned to set these abbre-
viations in all caps because there were no
small caps on typewriters. But now that you
have the capability, you can and should set
the properly.
62
There Is No resT For The WIcked
The Wicked Are Very Weary.
True-drawn small caps are specially drawn to match the weight of the
capital letters in the same face. Typefaces are Caslon Semibold, Caslon
Expert Semibold, Caslon Regular amd Caslon Expert Regular.
63
Paragraph breaks set a rhythm for the reader.
The breaks have a relationship with the
column of text as well as the page margins.
A break may be introduced as an indentation,
as a space or both.
1. first line at the beginning of an article should be
flush left (do not indent first paragraph)
2. block paragraphs are flush left and are separated
by extra leading not a full return
3. the amount indent is = to the leading (sometimes
needs a bit more)
4. never hit two returns between paragraphs
In typography there are four rules regarding paragraph breaks:
ParagraphBreaks
64
The over all page feel will be influenced by your choice.
!
65
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Fi-garo published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he con-ceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contem-porary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninter-rupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expres-sive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers be-tween themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
66
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Fi-garo published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he con-ceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contem-porary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninter-rupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expres-sive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers be-tween themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
67
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or un-ripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an unin-terrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expres-sive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers be-tween themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
68
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innova-tion in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and art-ists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innova-tive and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Mari-netti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
69
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public an-ger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or un-ripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Ital-ian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of lan-guage, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Fu-turists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
70
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Fi-garo published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he con-ceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contem-porary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninter-rupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expres-sive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers be-tween themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
71
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glori-fied contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a po-lemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futur-ist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
!!
!
72
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, origi-nality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and mo-tion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and art-ists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of inno-vative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
73
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futur-ism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
74
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombas-tic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new im-ages… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition,
75
76
!Headers subheads
Headers are used to indicate the subject matter
and subheads are used to emphasise the header.
Crossheads
77
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futur-ism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
Wor
ds
in L
iber
tyA
Pro
logue
to
Futu
rism
78
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with
a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later
manifestos of Futurist poets and artists offered formal, “technical”
approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still
resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become
“an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images
or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This
freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and
of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and
expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in
motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the
Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and sur-
roundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between
themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti
selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
Words in Liberty:A Prologue to Futurism
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
a radical mix of art and life
But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and
work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense
of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into
focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the
epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Rus-
sian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if
its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they
carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
!
79
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glori-fied contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a po-lemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futur-ist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
!!
!
to Futurism
A radical mix of art and life
Words in Liberty: A Prologue
80
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, origi-nality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and mo-tion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and art-ists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of inno-vative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
Words in LibertyA Prologue to Futurism
a radical mix of art and life
81
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public an-ger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or un-ripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Ital-ian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of lan-guage, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Fu-turists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
A radical mix of art and life
Words in Liberty:
A prologue to Futurism
82
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, origi-nality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glori-fied contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninter-rupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expres-sive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers be-tween themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
A radical mix of art and life
Words in Liberty
A Prologue to Futurism
83
!
Captionsnotes
Whether their intent is academic or artistic, footnotes present
special typographic challenges.
84
Footnotes and endnotes are necessary components of scholarly and technical writing. They’re also frequently used by writers of fiction, from Herman Melville (Moby-Dick) to contemporary novelists.
Specifically, a footnote is a text element at the
bottom of a page of a book or manuscript that
provides additional information about a point
made in the main text. The footnote might
provide deeper background, offer an alternate
interpretation or provide a citation for the
source of a quote, idea or statistic. Endnotes
serve the same purpose but are grouped to-
gether at the end of a chapter, article or book,
rather than at the bottom of each page.
85
These general guidelines will help you design footnotes and endnotes that are readable, legible and economical in space.
(Note that academic presses and journals
can be sticklers for format: before proceed-
ing, check with your client or publisher to
see if they have a specific stylesheet that
must be followed.)
86
Numbers or Symbols: Footnotes are
most often indicated by placing a superscript
numeral immediately after the text to be ref-
erenced. The same superscript numeral then
precedes the footnoted text at the bottom of
the page. Numbering footnotes is essential
when there are many of them, but if footnotes
are few they can be marked with a dagger, as-
terisk, or other symbol instead. Endnotes should
always use numerals to facilitate easy referencing.
Size: Footnotes and endnotes are set
smaller than body text. The difference in size
is usually about two points, but this can vary
depending on the size, style and legibility of
the main text. Even though they’re smaller,
footnotes and endnotes should still remain at
a readable size.
87
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futur-ism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
Wor
ds
in L
iber
tyA
Pro
logue
to
Futu
rism
2 par
ole
in l
iber
ta =
wor
ds s
et f
ree
(lib
erty
)3 s
elbs
t =
him
self
1 Phi
lip M
eggs
, H
isto
ry o
f G
raph
ic
Des
ign,
Van
Nos
tran
d R
einh
old,
198
8
88
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with
a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later
manifestos of Futurist poets and artists offered formal, “technical”
approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still
resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become
“an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images
or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This
freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and
of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and
expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in
motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the
Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and sur-
roundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between
themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti
selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
Words in Liberty:A Prologue to Futurism
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
a radical mix of art and life
But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and
work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense
of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into
focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the
epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Rus-
sian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if
its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they
carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
!
2 parole in liberta = words set free (liberty) 3 selbst = himself
1 Philip Meggs, History of Graphic Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988
89
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glori-fied contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a po-lemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futur-ist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
!!
!
to Futurism
A radical mix of art and life
Words in Liberty: A Prologue
2 parole in liberta = words set free (liberty)
1 Philip Meggs, History of Graphic Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988
3 selbst = himself
90
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, origi-nality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and mo-tion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and art-ists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of inno-vative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
Words in Liberty
A Prologue to Futurism
a radical mix of art and life
2 parole in liberta = words set free (liberty)
1 Philip Meggs, History of Graphic Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988
3 selbst = himself
91
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public an-ger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or un-ripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Ital-ian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of lan-guage, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Fu-turists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
A radical mix of art and life
Words in Liberty:
A prologue to Futurism2 parole in liberta = words set free (liberty)
1 Philip Meggs, History of Graphic Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988
3 selbst = himself
92
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, origi-nality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glori-fied contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But it is the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance ifavor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestos of Futurist poets and artists offered formal, “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in libertà2, by which poetry was to become “an uninter-rupted sequence of new images… (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expres-sive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarmé. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers be-tween themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst3 (circa 1915), “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
A radical mix of art and life
Words in Liberty
A Prologue to Futurism1 Philip Meggs, History of Graphic Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988
2 parole in liberta = words set free (liberty)
3 selbst = himself
93
94
Font specs
95
HUMANIST
xoaengdp• little contrast between thick and thin of strokes• stroke weight has inflections similar to handwriting• strong diagonal stress such as on letter o• sloping bar on letter e
Jenson, Goudy’s Kennerly, Bruce Rogers’ Centaur
GERALD (OLD STYLE)
xoaengdp• contrast between thick and thin strokes is more pronounced• horizontal bar on e• diagonal stress is less prominent• shorter x-height
• scooped serifs, sturdy without being heavy
Sabon, Garamond, Bembo, Times, Plantin, Caslon Old Style
TRANSITIONAL
xoeangdp•contrast between thick and thin strokes is pronounced• very slight diagonal stress• bracketed serifs• horizontal bar on e• tall x-height
Baskerville, Caslon, Perpetua, (newer garamonds)
SerifDIDONE (MODERN)
xoaengdp• extreme contrast between thick and thin strokes• hairline (strokes) serifs• horizontal stress• horizontal bar on e
Jenson, Goudy’s Kennerly, Bruce Rogers’ Centaur
NEW TRANSITIONAL
xoaengdp• sturdy typefaces hold up under poor printing• little contrast between thick and think strokes• horizontal stress• horizontal bar on e• tall x-height• shorter ascenders, descenders
Bookman, Century Schoolbook, Cheltenham
EGYPTIAN OR SLAB SERIF
xoeangdp• mono weight• square ended serifs• horizontal stress• horizontal bar on e
Baskerville, Caslon, Perpetua, (newer garamonds)
96
GROTESQUE
xAag• slight contrast in the stroke weight• slight squareness to the curves• usually a tall x-height : short ascenders and descenders• usually a two story lowercase a• capital R usually has a curled leg• capital G usually has a spur
Helvetica, Univers, Akzidenz Grotesk, Folio
Sans Serif
GEOMETRIC
xAag• vary little contrast in the stroke weight (monoline)• a little wider set• constructed from simple shapes : circle and rectangle• usually a one story lowercase a• upper case A has a pointed apex
Futura, Kabel, Metro
HUMANIST
xAag• based on the proportions of the Roman capitals• some contrast in the stroke weight• lowercase a and g are usually two story
Syntax, Frutiger, Praxis, Stone Sans
97
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&Font List
akzidenz groteskdesigner: gunter gerhard lange classification: grotesque characteristics: spur on g, tall x-height, short
ascenders and descenders, short tail on q
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&baskervilledesigner: john baskerville classification: transitional characteristics: diagonal stress, bracketed
serifs , tall x-height
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&beliziodesigner: david berlow classification: slab serif characteristics: monoweight, square serifs,
ball terminals
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&bembodesigner: stanley morison classification: old style characteristics: high contrast between thick
and thin strokes
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&bookmandesigner: alexander phemister classification: new transitional characteristics: horizontal stress, tall x-height
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&bodoni (bauer bodoni)designer: giambattista bodoni classification: didone (modern) characteristics: extreme contrast between
thick and thin strokes
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&caslon (adobe caslon)designer: carol twombly classification: transitional characteristics: long tail on q, slight diagonal
stress
98
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&clarendondesigner: robert besley classification: slab serif characteristics: monoweight, large
ball terminals
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&clickerdesigner: greg thompson classification: grid based san-serif characteristics: little stroke contrast,
technology based, tall x-height
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&didotdesigner: firmin didot classification: modern characteristics: high contrast stroke weight,
tall x-height
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&DINdesigner: albert jan-pool classification: grotesque characteristics: no stroke contrast, tall
x-height, short ascenders and descenders
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&disturbancedesigner: jeremy tankard classification: new transitional characteristics: mix of upper and lowercase,
unique g and q, bracketed serif
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&filosofiadesigner: zuzana licko classification: modern characteristics: bracketless serif, contrasting
stroke
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&frutigerdesigner: adrian frutiger classification: humanist characteristics: low contrast, short ascenders
and descenders
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&cholladesigner: sibylle hagmann classification: n/a characteristics: squared curves, short
ascenders and descenders
99
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&garamond (adobe gara-designer: claude garamond classification: old style characteristics: bracketed serifs, short
x-height, variable weight
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&gill sansdesigner: eric gill classification: humanist characteristics: minimal stroke width, wide
character width
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&goudydesigner: frederic w. goudy classification: old style characteristics: short x-height, diagonal stress,
stroke variation
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&helveticadesigner: max medinger classification: grotesque characteristics: tall x-heights, two-story a,
squared leg kicks
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&interstatedesigner: tobias frere-jones classification: grotesque characteristics: short ascenders/descenders,
angled finials
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&künstler scriptdesigner: hans bohn classification: script characteristics: different line weights, ball
terminals, goudy caps
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&meliordesigner: herman zapf classification: transitional serif characteristics: high stroke contrast, square
serif ending
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&futuradesigner: paul rennerz classification: geometric characteristics: circular bowls/counters,
monoweight, wide
100
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&mrs eavesdesigner: zuzana licko classification: transitional characteristics: vertical stress, g has no open
counter, thick and thin strokes
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&news gothicdesigner: morris fuller benton classification: grotesque characteristics: tall x-height, shallow
descenders
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&plateletdesigner: conor mangat classification: geometric characteristics: no stroke variation, half upper/
half lower
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&rockwelldesigner: monotype corporation classification: slab serif characteristics: mono weight, square serifs
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&rotis sans serifdesigner: otl aicher classification: humanist sans serif characteristics: tall x-height, two story a,
Q tail is above baseline
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&rotis serifdesigner: otl aicher classification: humanist serif characteristics: bracketed serifs, tall x-height,
subtle stroke contrast
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&sabondesigner: jan tschichold classification: old style characteristics: thicks and thins, short
x-height, scooped serifs
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&memphisdesigner: emil rudolf weiss classification: slab serif characteristics: mono weight, square serifs,
horizontal stress
101
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&shelleydesigner: matthew carter classification: script characteristics: all characters connect,
consistent loop
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&snell roundhanddesigner: matthew carter (charles snell) classification: script characteristics: calligraphy influenced, strong
stroke variation
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&swiftdesigner: gerard unger classification: new transitional/humanist characteristics: sturdy, tall x-height, short
ascenders/descenders
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&trade gothicdesigner: jackson burke classification: humanist san serif characteristics: tall x-height, short ascenders/
descenders
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&universdesigner: adrian frutiger classification: grotesque characteristics: monoweight, heavy, short
ascenders/descenders
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&voltadesigner: konrad bauer, walter baum classification: slab serif characteristics: thick/thin strokes, large
square serifs
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&walbaumdesigner: justus erich walbaum classification: modern characteristics: extreme contrast, hairline
serifs, horizontal stress
HAMBURGERQ hamburgerq?!&memphisdesigner: emil rudolf weiss classification: slab serif characteristics: mono weight, square serifs,
horizontal stress
102
Font details
103
BOOK
HAIRLINE
SEMI-BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
Archer
MaxogGdQRstA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups cor-respond roughly to the Renaissance, Ba-roque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have contin-ued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 { } ? ! @ & *
104
ROMAN
BOLD
BLACK
Akzidenz Grotesk
MaxogGdQRstA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nine-teenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and En-lightenment periods in art and litera-ture. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
105
REGULAR
SMALL CAPS
ITALIC
BOLD
Baskerville
MxaogGdQRtA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
106
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BLACK ITALIC
Belizio
MxagGdQrRA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when print-ers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist let-terforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and mod-ern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first cen-turies have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when print-ers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connect-ed to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-tinued to create new typefaces based on historic characteris-tics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
107
LIGHT
BOLD
BLACK
Bell Gothic
MxagGdQrRIA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
108
MxagGdQrRIREGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
EXTRA BOLD
Bembo
MxnogGdQrRstA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlighten-ment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth cen-tury, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analo-gous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefac-es are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have contin-ued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
109
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
Bookman
MxaogGdQrRA basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups corre-spond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment peri-ods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups corre-spond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment peri-ods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
110
MxaogGdQrRREGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
ORNAMENTS
Bodoni
MxaogGdQrRstA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
111
REGULAR
ITALIC
SWASH
ORNAMENT
ALTERNATE
Caslon
MxanogGdQRtA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Ba Ca Da Ea Fa Ga Ha Ia Ja Ka La Ma Na Oa Pa Qa Ra Sa Ta Ua Va Wa Xa Ya Z
A a Bb C c D d Ee F f G g H h Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Or S s Ot Uu Vv Ww X x y Z z 1 2 3 4
c h i k l Ss T t
112
MxanogGdQRtREGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
Century Schoolbook
MxaogGdQrRtA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-enment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic charac-teristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
113
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
Cheltenham
MaxogGdQrRsA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
114
MaxogGdQrRsUNICASE
REGULAR
Cholla
MaxnogGdQrRstA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to that
of art history. Humanist letterforms are
closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and
less organic. These three main groups
correspond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art
and literature. Designers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries have continued
to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn
Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
115
LIGHT
REGULAR
BOLD
Clarendon
MxagGdQrRtA basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-enment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twen-ty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
116
MxagGdQrRtREGULAR
Clicker
MaxnogGdQRsA basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
117
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
Didot
MxaogGdQrRtA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renais-sance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
118
MxaogGdQrRtDIN
MaxnogGdQrRtLIGHT
REGULAR
MEDIUM
BLACK
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 { ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 { ? ! @ & *
119
DIN
MaxngdQHAMBURGLIGHT CONDENSED
REGULAR CONDENSED
BOLD CONDENSED
BLACK CONDENSED
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
120
MaxngdQHAMBURGREGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
Disturbance
MxnatQbWFGdRA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised
in the nineteenth century, when printers sought
to identify a heritage for their own craft analo-
gous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms
are closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and modern
typefaces are more abstract and less organic.
These three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in the
twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-
tinued to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo
Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp
Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo
Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
121
REGULAR
Fette Fraktur
MxnaopQrRtfgA basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for their
own craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely connected to
calligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main
groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art
and literature. Designers in the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries have continued to create
new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *Idunt aliquam adignim velit utat. Etuer accum dunt ad magniam, ven-diat lam verostrud essi tetum illa facipisl utet endre feu faccum dit praessi. Ing ea feuguer aessenim atisi.Delessi. Sectet, sit, ver si.Alit ipit esequis exer adigna adignit aliquat lam dunt utpat aut nisisi.Tate conse nim adionsecte feuis etum dolobore molore verit veniss
122
MxnaopQrRtfgREGULAR
FRACTIONS
UNICASE
Filosofia
MxnaopQrRtfGgA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nine-teenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and mod-ern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first cen-turies have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
123
BOOK
DEMI
HEAVY
CONDENSED
Franklin Gothic
MaxodQRtfGgA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to iden-tify a heritage for their own craft anal-ogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups cor-respond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefac-es based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
124
CONDENSED
REGULAR
BOLD
ULTRA BLACK
Frutiger
MaxodQRtfGgA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have contin-ued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analo-gous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefac-es are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have contin-ued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
125
BOOK
BOLD
EXTRA BOLD
Futura
MxaopQRstGgA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when print-ers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist let-terforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and mod-ern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups corre-spond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment peri-ods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
126
MxaopQRstGgREGULAR
BOLD
BLACK EXTENDED
Helvetica
MaoygGdQrRtA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when print-ers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups cor-respond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first cen-turies have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
ULTRA LIGHT
127
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
Gill Sans
MaxnbyogGQRtA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renais-sance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
128
BOOK
BOLD
ITALIC
LIGHT
Gotham
MayogGdQRtA basic system for classifying type-
faces was devised in the nineteenth
century, when printers sought to
identify a heritage for their own
craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely con-
nected to calligraphy and the move-
ment of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract
and less organic. These three main
groups correspond roughly to the
Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-
enment periods in art and litera-
ture. Designers in the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries have continued
to create new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-
faces was devised in the nineteenth
century, when printers sought to
identify a heritage for their own
craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely
connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional
and modern typefaces are more ab-
stract and less organic. These three
main groups correspond roughly
to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and
literature. Designers in the twenti-
eth and twenty-first centuries have
continued to create new typefaces
based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
129
REGULAR
BOLD
BLACK EXTENDED
Helvetica
MaoygGdQrRtA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when print-ers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups cor-respond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first cen-turies have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
ULTRA LIGHT
130
MaoygGdQrRtREGULAR
BOLD
BLACK
BOLD CONDENSED
Interstate
MaoygGdQrRtA basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a
heritage for their own craft analogous to
that of art history. Humanist letterforms
are closely connected to calligraphy
and the movement of the hand. Transi-
tional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three
main groups correspond roughly to the
Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlighten-
ment periods in art and literature. De-
signers in the twentieth and twenty-first
centuries have continued to create new
typefaces based on historic character-
istics.
A basic system for classifying typefac-
es was devised in the nineteenth cen-
tury, when printers sought to identify
a heritage for their own craft analo-
gous to that of art history. Humanist
letterforms are closely connected to
calligraphy and the movement of the
hand. Transitional and modern typefac-
es are more abstract and less organic.
These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque,
and Enlightenment periods in art and
literature. Designers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries have contin-
ued to create new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
131
REGULAR
Kunstler Script
xyogGdQrRstAa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. De-signers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
132
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BOLD
Melior
MayogGdQrRtA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twen-tieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transi-tional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlighten-ment periods in art and literature. De-signers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic character-istics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
133
LIGHT
MEDIUM
EXTRA BOLD
Memphis
MxagGdQrRtA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefac-es was devised in the nineteenth cen-tury, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and En-lightenment periods in art and litera-ture. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
134
REGULAR
CAPS
BLACK
ITALIC
Meta
MaxogGdQrRstA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefac-es are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlighten-ment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
135
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
FRACTIONS
Mrs Eaves
MaxogGdQrRstA basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when print-
ers sought to identify a heritage for their own
craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist
letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy
and the movement of the hand. Transitional
and modern typefaces are more abstract and less
organic. These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first cen-
turies have continued to create new typefaces
based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the
nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage
for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist
letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-
ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces
based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
136
MaxogGdQrRstREGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
News Gothic
MaxogGdQrRstA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when print-ers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when print-ers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
137
REGULAR
OCR A
MaopQRfGgA basic system for clas-
sifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth
century, when printers
sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft
analogous to that of art
history. Humanist let-
terforms are closely con-
nected to calligraphy and
the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern
typefaces are more histor-
ic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
138
MaopQRfGgBOOK
ITALIC
BOLD
Optima
MxaopQRstGgA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
139
LIGHT
OLD STYLE
MEDIUM
BLACK
Palatino
MxaopQRstGgA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
140
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
Perpetua
MxaopQRstGgqA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Ba-roque, and Enlightenment periods in art and litera-ture. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in
the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify
a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art
history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to cal-
ligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries
have continued to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
141
THIN
REGULAR
HEAVY
Platelet
MaxbyogGQrRtA basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to
that of art history. Humanist letter-
forms are closely connected to cal-
ligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are
more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-
enment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-
first centuries have continued to create
new typefaces based on historic charac-
teristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to
that of art history. Humanist letter-
forms are closely connected to cal-
ligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are
more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-
enment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-
first centuries have continued to create
new typefaces based on historic charac-
teristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll
Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx
Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { }
? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll
Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx
Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { }
? ! & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll
Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx
Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { }
? ! @ & *
142
REGULAR
ALTERNATE
BOLD
Priori Sans
MxanopdrRtSfGgA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in
the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify
a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art
history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to
calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional
and modern typefaces are more abstract and less
organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods
in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries have continued to create new
typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised
in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to
identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to
that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely
connected to calligraphy and the movement of the
hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main groups
correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Design-
ers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have
continued to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
143
REGULAR
ALTERNATE
BOLD
Priori Serif
MxanodQrRtSfgA basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when printers
sought to identify a heritage for their own craft
analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-
forms are closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and modern
typefaces are more abstract and less organic.
These three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in the
twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-
tinued to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was de-
vised in the nineteenth century, when printers
sought to identify a heritage for their own craft
analogous to that of art history. Humanist let-
terforms are closely connected to calligraphy
and the movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and less
organic. These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first
centuries have continued to create new type-
faces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
144
(55) SANS
ITALIC
SERIF
ITALIC
Rotis
MxanopQrRtGgA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renais-sance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
145
REGULAR
SMALL CAPS
BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
Sabon
MxayogGQfRA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
146
MxayogGQfRREGULAR
CAPS
ITALIC
BOLD
Scala Sans
MxabyogGdQrRA basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for their
own craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely connected
to calligraphy and the movement of the
hand. Transitional and modern typefaces
are more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to the
Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in
the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have
continued to create new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for their
own craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely connected
to calligraphy and the movement of the
hand. Transitional and modern typefaces
are more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to the
Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in
the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have
continued to create new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
147
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BLACK
Serifa
MxaoygGdQRA basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth cen-
tury, when printers sought to identify
a heritage for their own craft analo-
gous to that of art history. Humanist
letterforms are closely connected to
calligraphy and the movement of the
hand. Transitional and modern typefac-
es are more abstract and less organic.
These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque,
and Enlightenment periods in art and
literature. Designers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries have contin-
ued to create new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
148
MxaoygGdQRREGULAR
Snell Rouandhand
axogbGdQrRstAa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-tinued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
149
BOLD CONDENSED
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
Swift
MxaoygGdQrRA basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to that
of art history. Humanist letterforms are
closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and
less organic. These three main groups cor-
respond roughly to the Renaissance, Ba-
roque, and Enlightenment periods in art
and literature. Designers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries have continued
to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for their
own craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely connected to
calligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main
groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art
and literature. Designers in the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries have continued to create
new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
150
MxaoygGdQrRREGULAR
BOLD
BLACK
BLACK
Syntax
MxaoygGdQrRA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
151
CONDENSED
MEDIUM
BOLD
BOLD NO.2
Trade Gothic
MxanyogGdQrRA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
152
MxanyogGdQrRREGULAR
ITALIC
SMALL CAPS
BOLD
Walbaum
MxyagGdQrRA basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-tinued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
153
REGULAR
MEDIUM
MEDIUM ITALIC
BOLD
Volta
MyogGdQrRA basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-tinued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are close-ly connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
154
MyogGdQrR
155
Designed by Danielle Self Class project for Professor Herstowski’s Typography 02: The University of Kansas, Spring 2011
Text for the book was compiled from the following sources:
• Elements of Typographic Style Robert Bringhurst
• Getting it Right with Type: the Do’s and Don’ts of Typography Victoria Square
• Mac is Not A Typewriter Robin Williams
This book is not to be sold to the public and to only be used by the designer for their reference and student design portfolio.
156