Turkey and Shanghai Cooperation Organization

8/10/2019 Turkey and Shanghai Cooperation Organization

1/13

Turkey and Shanghai Cooperation Organization

Turkey, candidate member for European Union (EU) since 2005, has recently started thinking

that it is time to look for new opportunities. The fact that EU has been unfair for Turkey about

various issues such as free pass in Schengen zone and also economic crisis that EU has deeply

suffered made Turkish people reconsider their opinions about EU. Shanghai Five, which isknown as Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) is a hot issue right now and Prime Minister

of Turkey has mentioned about the possibility to be a part of the cooperation, instead of EU,

even though it is assumed a really slight possibility.

The reason lays behind preparing the work is to identify countries that are members of SCO and

show comparison in terms of some macroeconomic indicators between the organization

members and Turkey, without any subjective mentions. Turkey, attended to last meeting of the

Cooperation in 2012 as an observer, is also in talks with Russian Federation and China about the

integration to the organization.

Shanghai Cooperation Organization which was formerly known as Shanghai Five was created

by Russia, China, Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan in 1996. After addition of

Uzbekistan in 2001, the organization has become Shanghai Cooperation Organization.

The official languages of SCO are Russian and Chinese, as it might be guessed. Beside members

of SCO, observer nations, dialog partners and guest countries are also welcome to SCOs

meetings. The list of the countries and their status in SCOs meetings arelisted below.

Observer Countries Dialog Partners Guest Countries

Afghanistan Belarus ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations)

India Sri Lanka CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States)ran Turkey TurkmenistanMongolia

PakistanResource:http://www.sectsco.org

Summits of SCO, which are organized annually started, in Shanghai (China) in 2001 and the last

summit was held in Bishkek, the capital of Kyrgyz Republic, on December 5th2012.

The comparison has been done in 15 different indicators (Cost to Export, Cost to Import,

Employment Ratio, Export Volume Index, Export Value Index, Import Volume Index, Import

Value Index, net FDI, FDI inflows, FDI outflows, GDP, GINI Index, GDP growth,

Unemployment and Population) in order to compare better Turkey with the Cooperation

members.

After China (with population of 1.34 billion), Russia is the biggest country in SCO, in terms of

population, while Kyrgyz Republic has the lowest with its 5.5 million people.


2/13

Figure 1.PopulationTurkey and SCO excluding China (2004-2011)

Resource:The World Bank

The population of China is growing faster and faster every year. In a short time as 8 years,

China's population grew around 50 million, which is around two third of Turkey's population.

Figure-2.Population - China (2004-2011)


China's GDP has been rising sharply every year and reached more than 7.000 billion of US $ at

the end of 2011. Meanwhile, Russia had also an increasing trend between 2003 and 2008. Even

though the global crisis affected Russia in 2009, they overcame this threat and saw their GDP

around 1,800 billion of US $ in 2011. Turkey followed the same path with Russia, despite the

tackle in 2009, they made well to put their GDP level almost 800 billion of US $ at the end of

2011.

0,00

20,00

40,00

60,00

80,00

100,00

120,00

140,00

160,00

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Population (million people)

Russian Federation

Turkey

Kyrgyz Republic

Uzbekistan

Kazakhstan

Tajikistan

1270

1280

1290

1300

1310

1320

1330

1340

1350

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Population (million people)

China


3/13

Figure-3.GDP (2004-2011)


According to GDP change as percentage, it is obvious that China, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan

are the only countries that did not have a single decrease in their performances between 2003 and

2011. GDPs of both Russia and Turkey had fallen in 2009 due to crisis, but they recovered

themselves but with a slight difference: Turkey's GDP change had been greater than Russian's.

Figure-4.GDP Growth (2004-2011)


GINI Index simply indicates the difference between poor people and rich people in the country.

The measure is between 0 - 1, which getting to 0 means that economic differences between

people in the country is decreasing while 1 means the huge differences in economic level of the

people. Even though there is only one available data for China in terms of GINI Index, it is

estimated that the index rate would be much higher (getting to 1). According to the common year

0,0

1000,0

2000,0

3000,0

4000,0

5000,0

6000,0

7000,0

8000,0

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

GDP (current , million US$)

Russian Federation

Turkey

Kyrgyz Republic

Uzbekistan

China

Kazakhstan

Tajikistan

-20,00

-15,00

-10,00

-5,00

0,00

5,00

10,00

15,00

20,00

25,00

RussianFederation

Turkey KyrgyzRepublic

Uzbekistan China Kazakhstan Tajikistan

GDP growth (annual %)

20042005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011


4/13

for other members of SCO (2009), Kazakhstans GINI Index is the best while Turkeys

performance is also significant; at the end of 2008, Turkeys index has decreased to 0.37. No

data was available for Uzbekistan.

Figure-5.GINI Index (2004-2009)


Paul Ashworth, the chief North American economist for Capital Economics, mentions that the

best measure of labor market conditions is employment population ratio which is a statistical

ratio measuring the proportion of the country's working-age population (ages 15 to 64 in most

OECD countries) that is employed. This also includes people that have stopped looking for work.

Among members of SCO, China has the best employment rate according to the figure 6 showing

the employment to population ratio (15 and older). Approximately 70 % of Chinas population is

employed while Turkey has the lowest rate by around 42 %.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

RussianFederation



GINI index

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009


5/13

Figure-6.Employment Ratio (2004-2010)


Unemployment, which is critical for economies, indicates the share of the labor force that is

without work but available for and seeking employment.

Comparing to total labor force, China has the best unemployment ratio by having around 4%

while Turkey has the highest by almost 12% at the end of 2010. No data was available for

Uzbekistan and Tajikistan.

Figure-7.Total Unemployment (2004-2010)


The figure 8 illustrates the cost to export; which simply means how much a country would pay in

order to export to these countries listed in the figure. Per container prices show that Tajikistan is

the most expensive country in SCO by its more-than-8.000 $ cost to export, due to the sharply

increasing prices of main export-import products. Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyz Republic and

0,0

10,0

20,0

30,0

40,0

50,0

60,0

70,0

80,0

RussianFederation



Employment Ratio (%)

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

0,00

2,00

4,00

6,00

8,00

10,00

12,00

14,00

RussianFederation



Unemployment, total (% of total labor force)

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010


6/13

Russian Federation follow Tajikistan, respectively. China sparkles as the best country to start

export among others by having the lowest cost to export while Turkey has close numbers to

China. Tajikistan is considered as the worst.

Figure-8. Cost to Export (2005-2012)


Similar to the term of cost to export, cost to import measures how much it would cost to

import into the country and it is shown in Figure 9 below. Tajikistan, again, has the most

expensive prices per container for import to the country with its unstable economy. Uzbekistan,

Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic and Russian Federation follow Tajikistan in the same order. With

its low labor force and price policy, China has the lowest costs for import and also a plus here:

Turkey again has a significantly close cost of import prices to China.

Figure-9.Cost to Import (2005-2012)


$0$1.000$2.000$3.000$4.000$5.000$6.000$7.000$8.000$9.000

Cost to Export ($)

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

0

1000

20003000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

RussianFederation



Cost to Import ($)

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012


7/13

Export volume indexes are derived from the volume index series of United Nations Conference

on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and they are the ratio of the export value indexes to the

corresponding unit value indexes. The World Bank sets the index of 2000 as 100.

As it could be known easily, China has the highest export volume among all countries of SCO,

and also one of leading countries in the world. Another significant point is that Turkey is alsobetter than the rest of the all members of the organization.

Figure-10.Export Volume Index (2004-2011)


Export values are the current value of exports converted to U.S. dollars and expressed as a

percentage of the average for the base period. The World Bank sets the index of base period as

100.

As it is seen in the figure, Kazakhstan has the most valuable export among other countries. Main

export of Kazakhstan is oil, but another important fact is that Kazakhstan is the leading exporter

of uranium, which is used as a fuel in nuclear reactors. China, Russian Federation, Turkey,

Uzbekistan and Kyrgyz Republic are following Kazakhstan, respectively. Among all these

countries, Tajikistan has the lowest export value.

0,0

100,0

200,0

300,0

400,0

500,0

600,0

700,0

RussianFederation



Export volume index (2000 = 100)

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011


8/13

Figure-11. Export Value Index (2004-2011)


Import volume indexes are derived from the volume index series of United Nations Conference

on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and they are the ratio of the import value indexes to the

corresponding unit value indexes. The World Bank sets the index of 2000 as 100.

The import volume has been increased for all countries in SCO and also for Turkey. Import

Volume Index was assumed 100 for 2000, Russian Federation has the highest import volume

index with 500, while Turkey and Tajikistan have the lowest with around 200. China has almost

the same index with Russian Federation. This figure also indicates how eager countries are to

welcome export products.

Figure-12. Import Volume Index (2004-2011)


0,0100,0200,0300,0400,0500,0600,0700,0

800,0900,0

1000,0

Export value index (2000 = 100)

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

0,0050,00

100,00150,00200,00250,00300,00350,00400,00450,00500,00

Import volume index (2000 = 100)

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011


9/13

Import value indexes are the current value of imports (c.i.f.) converted to U.S. dollars and

expressed as a percentage of the average for the base period (2000). The World Bank sets the

index of the base period as 100.

Even though Russian Federation has the highest import volume index, in terms of the values,

China leads in the organization with and index value almost 800, while Kyrgyz Republic andKazakhstan are at almost the same level with China. Turkey has the lowest import value index

around 420, which is the lowest just before Uzbekistan.

Figure-13.Import Value Index (2004-2011)


According to definition of The World Bank for Foreign Direct Investments (FDIs), foreign direct

investment is net inflows of investment to acquire a lasting management interest (10 percent or

more of voting stock) in an enterprise operating in an economy other than that of the investor.

Foreign direct investment is assumed as the sum of equity capital, reinvestment of earnings,

other long-term capital, and short-term capital as shown in the balance of payments.

In terms of net Foreign Direct Investments (FDIs) as Balance of Payments in US Dollar ($),

China is the most effective country among all six countries of SCO and Turkey. With its crucial

performance at FDIs, Turkey has positive numbers for last 8 years while Russia has been facing

problems with FDI flows last 3 years.

0,0

100,0

200,0

300,0

400,0500,0

600,0

700,0

800,0

RussianFederation



Import value index (2000 = 100)

2004

2005

20062007

2008

2009

2010

2011


10/13

Figure-14.Net Foreign Direct Investment (2004-2011)


According to the figure 15 showing countries' foreign direct investment net flows as % of GDP,

six countries of SCO are examined. The results show that except Tajikistan, all other five

countries are more effective than Turkey in terms of attracting foreign direct investments into

their countries. Data which were taken from The World Bank show that these five countries

performed better than Turkey in 2003 until 2005. In the last three years Kyrgyz Republic has

been performing extraordinary performance by reaching to 12 % of GDP derived from foreign

direct investments. Also Kazakhstan had an increasing trend of its performance for attracting

FDIs until 2009, even though they had a sharp fall in 2010, it is possible to see that Kazakhstan

will be able to have its old trend again.

Even though Tajikistan had a strong trend for attracting foreign direct investments into the

country between 2004 and 2008, net inflows of FDIs for Tajikistan dropped dramatically in the

last three years due to corruption and economic mismanagement. Turkey, one of recent strong

players for FDIs, has a positive trend and increases to 2 % of its GDP as net FDI inflows in 2011.

$(50.000,00)

$-

$50.000,00

$100.000,00

$150.000,00

$200.000,00

Foreign direct investment, net (BoP, current US$)

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011


11/13

Figure-15.Foreign Direct Investment Net Inflows (2004-2011)


Even though Kazakhstan had ups and downs, still they followed an increasing trend in their

outflowing FDIs (in terms of % of GDP) and are assumed as having the best performance

between 2003 and 2010 with its peak in 2010. Also, Russian Federation has a fixed FDI outflow

between 2007 and 2011 with 3.5 % of its GDP. Meanwhile, Turkey had been making baby steps

since 2003 about FDI outflows. No data is available for Uzbekistan and Tajikistan on The

World Bank database.

Figure-16.Foreign Direct Investment Net Outflows (2004-2011)


-2,00

0,00

2,00

4,00

6,00

8,00

10,00

12,00

14,00

RussianFederation



Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP)

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

-3,00

-2,00

-1,00

0,00

1,00

2,00

3,00

4,00

5,00

6,00

RussianFederation



Foreign direct investment, net outflows (% of GDP)

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011


12/13

Strength and Weakness

The table shows performances of the countries in order to view the comparison in all terms of

indicators mentioned above. 1is assumed as the best among others while 7(could be 5or6 at some indicators, due to lack of data) is the worst.

Turkey China Russia Kyrgyz

Republic

Kazakhstan Tajikistan Uzbekistan

Cost to Export 3 2 4 5 1 6 7

Cost to Import 3 2 5 6 1 4 7

Employment

Ratio

4 7 3 6 1 2 5

Export Volume

Index

6 2 5 4 1 3 7

Export Value

Index

3 4 6 5 2 1 7

Import Volume

Index

1 6 4 5 2 3 7

Import Value

Index

4 6 2 7 1 3 5

FDI, net 6 2 4 - 1 3 5

FDI, inflows 5 6 1 3 4 2 7

FDI, outflows 1 4 5 - 3 2 -

GDP 2 3 7 5 1 4 6

GINI Index* 5 4 3 - - 1 2

GDP, growth 7 2 6 3 1 4 5

Unemployment** 4 5 3 - 1 2 -

Population 2 3 7 4 1 5 6*The data was taken for the year of 2007.

**The data was taken for the year of 2010.

Conclusion

Even though this work tries to show only the comparison between Turkey and members of SCO,

there are few points to be underlined. This work does not imply subjective words to suggest

whether to be a part of SCO. The conclusion only covers the notes of what Turkey might get if

they would be part of the organization.

Turkey has been trying to have close ties with China, a big threat for all export-based anddeveloping countries, in terms of trade with new protocols. One of the main reasons to consider

SCO as beneficial to Turkey is the possibility to have better trade offers that Turkey would get

with China instead of single protocols. This would put Turkey in a position as a strategic partner

for China, rather than a competitor.


13/13

Russia, the main natural gas exporter to Turkey, is another reason to jot down the organization as

a big plus for Turkey. If it is thought that one of the main reasons why Turkey has a large

amount of current deficit is the energy import, than it must be pointed out that Turkish

integration to the organization would make Russia look much better ally to Turkey in terms of

energy trade.

New investment cooperation could be created as well: trade (both export and import) between

Turkey and Kazakhstan has been rising in the last three years. Turkey that will have two new

nuclear stations in Sinop and Mersin would benefit from this cooperation by acquiring uranium

and oil with better conditions.

To understand the current trade between Turkey and Kazakhstan, latest data from the Turkish

Ministry of Economy are taken: Kazakhstan ranked 31st among Turkey's most preferred exports

destination and 27th among Turkey's major importers in 2011, in terms of merchandise trade.

Along with Russia, China and Kazakhstan, the other members of the organization would alsoencourage Turkeys main trade focus by diverting it to new destinations. It must be remembered

that integrations to different organizations/zones always provide new opportunities!

The links of countries investment agencies are listed below.

Turkey -http://www.invest.gov.tr/tr-TR/Pages/Home.aspx

China -http://www.investinchina.gov.cn/index.html

Kazakhstan -http://invest.gov.kz/

Uzbekistan -http://www.investuzbekistan.uz/

Tajikistan -http://www.tajinvest.tj

Russia -http://invest.gov.ru/en/

Kyrgyzstan -http://www.kyrgyzinvest.com/en/general.php
http://www.invest.gov.tr/tr-TR/Pages/Home.aspxhttp://www.invest.gov.tr/tr-TR/Pages/Home.aspxhttp://www.invest.gov.tr/tr-TR/Pages/Home.aspxhttp://www.investinchina.gov.cn/index.htmlhttp://www.investinchina.gov.cn/index.htmlhttp://www.investinchina.gov.cn/index.htmlhttp://invest.gov.kz/http://invest.gov.kz/http://invest.gov.kz/http://www.investuzbekistan.uz/http://www.investuzbekistan.uz/http://www.investuzbekistan.uz/http://www.tajinvest.tj/http://www.tajinvest.tj/http://www.tajinvest.tj/http://invest.gov.ru/en/http://invest.gov.ru/en/http://invest.gov.ru/en/http://www.kyrgyzinvest.com/en/general.phphttp://www.kyrgyzinvest.com/en/general.phphttp://www.kyrgyzinvest.com/en/general.phphttp://www.kyrgyzinvest.com/en/general.phphttp://invest.gov.ru/en/http://www.tajinvest.tj/http://www.investuzbekistan.uz/http://invest.gov.kz/http://www.investinchina.gov.cn/index.htmlhttp://www.invest.gov.tr/tr-TR/Pages/Home.aspx

Turkey and Shanghai Cooperation Organization

Documents

Transcript of Turkey and Shanghai Cooperation Organization