Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

24
Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel

Transcript of Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Page 1: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Turbulent CoexistenceHeather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai,

Bruce Kendall, David Siegel

Page 2: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Species Coexistence

• Consider two similar species A & B– Species A has a slightly better ability to utilize resources – Recruits compete for limited resources at settlement sites– Spawning timings are separated by weeks

• Compare cases with i) smooth dispersal kernel & ii) packet model for connectivity– Smooth dispersal kernel: spawning timing does not matter– Packet model: species A & B “catch” different eddies &

can settle at different sites

Page 3: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Diffusion Case

If they are put together, species B becomes extinct,species A thrives

On their own, both species can persist

Time (years)

IC’s: A = 100, B = 100

Page 4: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Packet Model

• Larval settlement as arrival of N packets

• L = domain size• l = eddy size (50 km)• T = Spawning time• t = eddy turnover rate (14 d)

t

T

l

LN

eddy size (l)

N larval packets

Page 5: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Spawning Window Overlap

• Specify how many days of overlap between spawning times for both species

• Makes some packets perfectly correlated for both species and others independent

Packets will have same settlement locations

Species A Spawning Window

Species B Spawning Window

TIME

Page 6: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Parameters

• Tsp (spawning time) = 30 days for both– Vary amount of overlap

• Fecundity of Sp.A = 0.5• Fecundity of Sp.B = 0.45• Adult Mortality = 0.09• Run time = 1000 yrs; • Patch size = 5 km; • Domain size = 500 km;• Averaged over 100 simulations • Larvae on larvae DD (total # of both sp)

BA

AA SSb

aSR

1

Page 7: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

28 days

Page 8: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Theory

• Species A is stronger competitor (fA > fB)

• Want to know if the growth rate of Sp. B is positive when rare and Sp. A is at equilibrium

A

BB

A

AA bS

aSR

bS

aSR

+1=

+1= ;

mtN

tREm

tN

tRE

B

B

A

A )(

)]([ ;

)(

)]([

• Estimate E[RA] and E[RB] with Taylor expansion around mean number of settlers– need E[SA], E[SB], var(SA), & cov(SA,SB,)

Page 9: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

( ) ( )

( ) ( )∑

0=

=

yBBB

yAAAA

BftyxDtxS

KftyxDtxS

,,,

,,,

• Assume spatially homogenous Adult distribution:

• Settlers:

( ) ( )0= = BtxNKtxN BAA ,;,

1== ∑∑y

By

A DD

0=

=

BfSE

KfSE

BB

AAA

][

][ ( ) ( )( ) ( )BAABABA

AAAA

DDBKffSSDKfS

,cov,covvarvar

0

22

==

Page 10: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Coexistence Condition

• Coexistence when:

• Calculate var(DA) and cov(DA,DB) from Packet Model and Flow Simulations

BAAAA

AA

AA

AA

A

AA

AA

A

B

DDDKbfKbf

KbfKbf

DKbf

Kbf

f

f

,covvar11

1

var1

1 2

Page 11: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

cov(DA,DB)

Page 12: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Coexistence line calculated with cov(DA,DB) & var(DA)

Page 13: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Equilibrium Pop B/A

Coexistence

Sp.B extinction

Page 14: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Equilibrium Pop B/A

Coexistence

Sp.B extinction

Page 15: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Recruitment Differences

• Key difference between species is density dependent per-capita recruitment rate, R/N

• For Species A:

A

AAA

bS

aS

KK

SR

1

1)(

Page 16: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Settler number (Sp A)

Pe

r-c

ap

ita

re

cru

itm

en

t

Species A

At equilibrium, average # Settlers is 50

KfS AA

Page 17: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Variability in Settlement

• If settlement varied between 20 & 80, then the per-capita recruitment rate would be less than if settlement was constant at 50

Page 18: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Recruitment Differences

• For Species B, recruitment is conditional on Sp. A settlers, too:

• So,

A

BBAB

bS

aS

BB

SSR

1

1),(

00

A

ABA

B

bS

SSaE

BS

B

RE

1

|1|

00

Page 19: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

Recruitment Differences

A

A

A

BAB

A

BABA

B

S

aS

Kf

f

bS

afS

B

RE

1

1

11|

0

• Do some math, get:

• AB is the correlation in dispersal between species

• Low correlation, 1st part dominates• High correlation, 2nd part dominates

Page 20: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Settler number (Sp A)

Pe

r-c

ap

ita

re

cru

itm

en

t

Species A

Species B

Correlation in Settlement: = 0Expected per-capita R rate for Sp B

At equilibrium Settlement, R/N for Sp. A > Sp. B

Page 21: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Settler number (Sp A)

Pe

r-c

ap

ita

re

cru

itm

en

t

Species A

Species B

Nonlinear averaging leads to R/N Sp. B > Sp. A

Expected per-capita R rate for Sp B

Correlation in Settlement: = 0

Variable Settlement between 20 & 80

Page 22: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Settler number (Sp A)

Pe

r-c

ap

ita

re

cru

itm

en

t

Species A

Species B

Correlation in Settlement: = 0.5Expected per-capita R rate for Sp B

Page 23: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Settler number (Sp A)

Pe

r-c

ap

ita

re

cru

itm

en

t

Species A

Species B

Correlation in Settlement: = 1Expected per-capita R rate for Sp B

Page 24: Turbulent Coexistence Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel.

• Because of nonlinear averaging, variability in settlement will increase the average per-capita recruitment rate for Sp. B above that of Sp A, so Sp. B can invade when rare

• This advantage becomes weaker as the correlation in dispersal increases

Conclusions