TurboTec Pilot tests - Sustecsustec.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/6-6-2011_Report_TurboTEc... ·...
Transcript of TurboTec Pilot tests - Sustecsustec.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/6-6-2011_Report_TurboTEc... ·...
TurboTec® Pilot tests
WWTP Amersfoort
31-5-2011
Content
• TurboTec® thermal sludge hydrolysis
• Test set up
• TurboTec® test Amersfoort sludge
• TurboTec® test Geestmerambacht sludge
• Summary of results
Continuous thermal hydrolysis: TurboTec®
Exocellular substances
Cells
140°C
Intracellular substances 6 bar
Stabilized sludge flocs pretreated sludge
Figure 1: Effect of thermal hydrolysis
Waste activated sludge contains a lot of EPS, which has a negative
Goals:- More biogas- Shorter retention time for digestion- Decreased viscosity- Increased dewaterablitiy
TurboTec pilotlot of EPS, which has a negative influence on digestability and dewatering of the sludge. By thermal hydrolysis the EPS is broken down
3
TurboTec® pilot plant
Pilot set up TurboTec® Digesters
Thickening
Fluidized sludge Water lock
Reject water
before and after
TurboTec®4
Test set up
On WWTP Amersfoort tests have been done with sludge from WWTP
Amersfoort and WWTP Geestmerambacht.
WWTP Amersfoort :low loaded carrousel with primary settling
Geestmerambacht :low loaded carrousel without primary settling
The TurboTec® test are performed in the period September 2010 till June 2011
Amersfoort sludge• Thermal hydrolysis on waste activated sludge and digestion of hydrolysed• Thermal hydrolysis on waste activated sludge and digestion of hydrolysed
waste activated sludge combined with primary sludge
• Decreasing retention time in digester
Geestmerambacht sludge• Thermal hydrolysis on waste activated sludge and digestion
• Increasing TS of waste activated sludge from 6% TS till 12%TS
Primary sludge 6 %
Secundary sludge 6 %
Digestion REF
RT 20 dDe-
watering
Primary sludge 6 %
Secundary sludge 6 %
Digestiong TT
RT 20 dDe-
wateringTH TT
Test 1a
Test 1b
Sludge WWTP Amersfoort
Primary sludge 6 %
Secundary sludge 6 %
Digestion REF
RT 20 dDe-
watering
Primary sludge 6 %
Secundary sludge 6%
Digestion TT
RT 20 -> 12 dDe-
wateringTH TT
Test 1b
TH TT = thermal hydrolysis TurboTec® Digestion REF = reference digester
Digestion TT = TurboTec® digester
Waste activated
sludge 6 %
Digestion REF
RT 20 dDe-
watering
Waste activated
sludge 6 %
Digestion TT
RT 20 dDe-
watering
TH
TT
Test 2aSludge WWTP Geestmerambacht
Digestion REF
RT 20 dDe-
watering
Waste activated
sludge12 %
Digestion TT
RT 20 dDe-
watering
TH
TT
Test 2b
Waste activated
sludge 6 %
Analyses
• TS- balances
• COD-balances
• Biogas production
• Biogas composition
• P-balances• P-balances
• N-balances
• Dewaterability
• Reject water composition
• Heavy metal balances
• Viscosity analyses
Technical fuctioning
In general the pilot performed well:
• No scaling in the TurboTec® unit
• Digesters operated continuously
During the test there have been some technical problems:
• Blockage in the digesters (test 2a/b), which resulted in mixing problems
in the digester
• Problems with pumps (especially recirculation pump TurboTec® - in full • Problems with pumps (especially recirculation pump TurboTec - in full
scale this pump will be replaced by a mixer)
• Problems with heating/cooling system of the digesters – causing
high/low temperatures
ConclusionMost technical problems occurred in the digesters
There were very few problems with the TurboTec® thermal hydrolysis
Most problems can be explained by typical small pilot scale
Effects of thermal hydrolysis on Amersfoort sludge
Process parameter TT REF TT/REF
Average TS removal(%) 2,14 1,84 1,16
Biogas production (L/h) 113 96 1,18
COD(total) to methane(%) 40,1 36,2 1,11
COD(total) after digestion (%) 40,4 48,8 0,83
Sludge cake TS(%) on lab scale centrifuge 18,0 14,6 1,23
Sludge cake TS (%) on pilot centrifuge 22 18 1,22
Effects of thermal hydrolysis (TT/REF) on the total sludge (primary + secundary)
Sludge cake TS (%) on pilot centrifuge 22 18 1,22
N in reject water (g/L) 1,64 1,47 1,12
P in reject water (g/L) 0,19 0,20 0,95
Effects of thermal hydrolysis (TT/REF) op the secundary slib
Process parameter Before After TT/REF
Specific biogas production (L/kgTS) 231 311 1,35
Viscosity secundary sludge at 100 rpm (mPas) 878 129 0,15
Reducing retention time Amersfoort sludge
50,0
100,0
150,0
200,0
250,0B
iog
as
pro
du
cti
e (
L/h
)
Biogasproductie vergisters fase 2
RT 20 d
RT 16 dRT 14 d RT 12 d
RT 20 d RT 20 d
Factor 1,18
Factor 1,18*20d/12d = 1,97
0,0
27-dec 3-jan 10-jan 17-jan 24-jan 31-jan
datum
Vergister TT Vergister REF prognose TT prognose REF
Problems with
heating REF
digester
By means of thermal hydrolysis the retention time can be reduced till 12 days
without losing gas production.
Factor 1,18
Feeding TS Geestmerambacht
4
6
8
10
12
DS
(%
)
DS gehaltes spuislib Geestmerambacht
Feeding of TT and REF digesters:
• from 1st of February till 29th of March both digesters have been fed
with 6% TS
• after 29th of March the TT digester is fed with 12% TS and REF digester
with 6% TS.
0
2
1-feb 15-feb 1-mrt 15-mrt 29-mrt 12-apr 26-apr 10-mei 24-mei
datum
sec. ruw Sec. na rotor Sec. na trommel sec. na tril Sec. na centri
Effect of thermal hydrolysis on 6% TS Geestmerambacht waste activated sludge
Process parameter TT REF TT/REF
Average TS removal(%) 1,93 1,49 1,30
Specific biogasproduction (l/kg TS) 335 272 1,23
Slibcake TS (%) with pilot centrifuge 25 18 1,38
N in rejectwater (g/L) 1,95 1,67 1,17
Effects of thermal hydrolysis on Geestmerambacht sludge
P in reject water (g/L) 0,21 0,20 1,05
Biogasproduction sludge Geestmerambacht
The TS of the feeding of the TT digester is doubled by pre-dewatering the
sludge with a centrifuge. This results in a double biogas production.
150,0
200,0
250,0
Bio
ga
s p
rod
uc
tie
(L
/h)
Biogasproductie vergisters Geestmerambacht
0,0
50,0
100,0
150,0
1-feb 15-feb 1-mrt 15-mrt 29-mrt 12-apr 26-apr 10-mei
Bio
ga
s p
rod
uc
tie
(L
/h)
datum
TT Vergister REF Vergister
Viscosity
Conclusion:
viscosity of TT sludge 12% TS = viscosity of normal sludge 6 % TS
Due to decreased viscosity digesters can be fed with a high TS content up to 12%.
Summary of the results
TurboTec® thermal hydrolysis has the following effects on secundary waste
activated sludge:
� Increased biogasproduction and DTS reduction by factor 1,30
� Increased TS of dewatered sludge cake by factor 1,35
� Reduced retention time for digstion down to 12 days
� Reduced viscosity by factor 7
� Digester feeding up to 12% TS