Tunnel diode models for electronic circuit analysis ...
Transcript of Tunnel diode models for electronic circuit analysis ...
Scholars' Mine Scholars' Mine
Masters Theses Student Theses and Dissertations
1969
Tunnel diode models for electronic circuit analysis program Tunnel diode models for electronic circuit analysis program
(ECAP) (ECAP)
Carmon Dale Thiems
Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses
Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons
Department: Department:
Recommended Citation Recommended Citation Thiems, Carmon Dale, "Tunnel diode models for electronic circuit analysis program (ECAP)" (1969). Masters Theses. 7002. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/7002
This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected].
TUNNEL DIODE MODELS FOR
ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT ANALYSIS PROGRAM (ECAP)
BY :;4 I
CARMON DALE THIEMS , 1938-
A
THESIS
s ubmitted to the faculty o f
THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOU.I - R J~LA
in part ial f ulfil lmen t of the requirement~ for t
Degree of
MASTER OF SC IENCE IN ELECTRICAL ENGI~EE I .J
Rolla, Hissouri
1969
Approved by
T. 2274 ~
68 pages
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES . ....•••..•.••.•.•...•...••..•....•....... LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
LIST OF TABLES . ..•.••.•.•...•••.••..•••.••..••.•••.•.••.•
I. INTRODUCTION • •..•.••••.•••••.••.••.•••...•..•...
II. MODELS Ah~ CURRENT-VOLTAGE CHARACTERISTICS .•.•••
III. MODELS IN CIRCUIT APPLICATIONS •.•••••••.••...••.
IV. CONCLUSIONS ..•..•.•..•.............•.•••...•....
APPENDIX I-SUXMARY OF MODELING OF ACTIVE DEVICES FOR COMPUTER-AIDED CIRCUIT DESIGN •.•••••.•.•..•.
REFERENCES . ....•...•.•.••.•...•......••..•.•...•
i-.??S:DIX II-ANALYSIS, CALCULXi'ION M~D SEL:C:CTlOJ.\ OF PA1\fu'1ETERS FOR TUNNEL DIODE HODELS .•.•..•....
BIBLIOGRAP11Y ............... g •••••••••••••••••••••
'i IT!...,. • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
iii v
vi
.1
4
30
J4
43
45
59
LIST OF FIGURES
Figur~ 1 Tunnel Diode Current-Voltage Characteristics
Figure 2 Model 1 Current-Voltage Characteristics
Figu-re 3 Hodel 1
Figure 4 Model 1 Current-Voltage Curve
Figure 5 Model 2 Current-Voltage Characteristic
Figure 6 Model 2
Figure 7 Hodel 2 Current-Voltage Curve
Figure 8 Model 3 Current-Voltage Characteristic
Figure 9 Model 3
Figure 10 Model 3 Current-Voltage Curve
Figure 11 Relaxation Oscillator
Figure 12 Astable Multivibrator
Figure 13 Model 1 Oscillator Output \vaveform
Figure 14 Model 2 Oscillator Output tvaveform
Figure 15 Model 3 Oscillator Output Waveform
Figure 16 Model 1 Multivibrator Output tvaveform
Figure 17 Hodel 2 Mul tivibrator Output t.Javeform
F::.gure I-1 Diode Current-Voltage Characteristic
Figu::..::: I-2 D::.ode Models
F~gure I-3 Ebers-Noll Hodel
'io':..gure I-4 Beaufoy-Sparks Charge Control Model
·?::..gur~ I-S Linvill Lumped Model
7::.gu-:.-.: 1-6 Zener Diode Model
iii
Page 1
4
6
7
8
11
12
13
16
17
19
21
23
25
27
~ r .JO
37
3S
39
39
40
iv
Figure I-7 Tunnel Diode Model 4l
Figure II-1 Tunnel Diode Current-Voltage Characteristic 47
Figure II-2 Model 1 48
Figure 11-3 Three Section Piecewise Linear Current Voltage Curve 49
Figure II-4 Model 2 52
Figure 11.;..5 Five Section Piecewise Linear Current Voltage Curve 53
Figure 11-6 Hodel 3 56
Figure I1-7 Model 3 Current-Voltage Characteristic 57
v
LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS
Page Photograph l TD-19 Current-Voltage Curve 2
Photograph 2 TD-13 Current-Voltage Curve 2
Photograph 3 Oscillator Output Voltage Waveform::. 18
Photograph 4 Multivibrator Output Voltage Waveform 18
vi
LIST OF TABLES
P<:.ge TABLE I Model 1 ECAP Data 5
TABLE II Model 2 ECAP Data 10
TABLE III Model 3 ECAP Data 15
TABLE IV Model 1 Oscillator ECAP Data 20
TABLE v Hodel 2 Oscillator ECAP Data 22
TABLE VI Hodel 3 Oscillator ECAP Data 24
TABLE VII Model 1 Multi vibrator ECAP Data 26
TABLE VIII Model 2 Multi vibrator ECAP Data 26
TABLE II-1 Data From G.E. Data Sheet 46
TABLE II-2 Model 1 Parameter Values so
TABLE II-3 Model 2 Parameter Values 55
TABLE II-4 Model 3 Parameter Values 58
1
I. INTRODUCTION
In this paper ECAP models for the tunnel diode are pre-
sented. Results showing the model, the current-voltage charateris-
tics are discussed. Operation in typical circuits is presented.
A summary of the current state of the art in modeling appears in
Appendix I.
Since ECAP is only structured to accept piecewise-linear
models of these devices, that type of model is presented here.
All of the models are developed to approximate the typical tunnel
diode current-voltage characteristic shown in Figure 1 and also
in Photographs 1 and 2. In Figure 1, peak current (Ip) and peak
voltage (Vp) identifies the point on the curve where the negative
portion of the V-I curve begins and valley current and valley
voltage identifies the point where the negative portion of the V-I
curve ends. These models use controlled current sources to
I
~ Ip il.) i-1 CJ C'~ ;:: r~
'T"i ....... ....... ..... s -
v VOLTAGE (millivolts)
Figure. 1 Tunnel Diode Current-Voltage Characteristics
o_
u
2
! !/ v I I
I I I )
I I I 1/ I
if - V1
Photograph 1 (traced) TD-19 Current Voltage Curve
CURRENT-2ma/cm VOLTAGE-O.OSv/cm
/'/ I I
I I
\ i I II
I
I I I I I I
I I
J I l
I
i
Photograph 2 (traced) TD-13 Current Voltage Curve
CURRENT-0.2ma/cm VOLTAGE-O.OSv/cm
3
realize the negative slope portion of these curves rather than
the negative resistors used by other tunnel diode models.
The models shown in Figure 3, 6 and 9 use all of the
available ECAP stored elements; resistors, inductors, capacitors,
voltage sources, dependent current sources, and independent
current sources. The method used to select the element values for
a particular tunnel diode is discussed in Appendix II.
II. MODELS AND CURRENT-VOLTAGE CHARACTERISTICS
The first model shown in Figure 3 and its current-voltage
curve in Figure 2 represent the simpliest meaningful straight
line approximation of the current voltage curve of the actual
I ~
~ Ip ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
E '-'
~ z ~
~ ~ u
Iv
device.
' ' ' '
VOLTAGE (millivolts)
I /
/
I
I
I J
I
v
Figure 2 Model 1 Current-Voltage Characteristics
The conductance G1 shown in Figure 3 is the element which
accounts for the positive slope line from (0,0) to (Vp,Ip).
4
At that point the controlled current source with -GX1 and control-
led by current in R3 is switched in the circuit S2 and provides
the negative slope line from (Vp,Ip) to (Vv,Iv). Then the control-
led current source with GM1 controlled by current in Rz and current
source -I1 are switched in for the remaining positive slope
The model is discussed in more detail in Appendix ~I.
5
'Ilk ECAP data in TABLE I describes the model of Figure 3
approximating TD-19 General Electric tunnel diode.
TABLE I Model 1 ECAP Data
Transient Analysis Bl N(l,2), R=(lOE7,0.36) E2 N(2,0), G~(0.154,0.058), E•(0,-0.355), I•(0,-0.00095) B3 N(2,0), R=lOES B4 N(2,3), R=l0E8 B5 N(3,0), R=O.OOl, E=-0.065 B6 N(2,0), R=l0E8, E-0.355 B7 N(2,0), C=l7E-!l BS N(4,1), L=O.SE-Y B9 N(2,3), R=l0E8 c ******************************************************* C These three cards describe the voltage generator to C give the voltage sweep for determining the model V-A C characteristic. BlO N(0,4), R=30, E=(l.5,0) Bll N(4,0), C=O.OSE-6 Bl2 N(4,0), R=l0E8, E=(-0.45,0) c ******************************************************* Tl B(9,2), GM=(0,0.185) T2 B(4,3), GM=(0,-0.185) Sl E=l, (l) , OFF 52 B=S, (3,4), OFF S3 B==6, (2,9), OFF S4 B=l2, (10,12), OFF
W!1en determining the current-voltage characteristic of the
model, B7 and B8 should be changed to the following:
37 N(2,0), R=l0E8 B8 N(4,1), R=O.OOl
This is required because the energy stored in the capacitor and
inductor are of the same order of magnitude as the energy cissi-
pated in the other elements and changing the direction of the
voltage and current cause the capacitor and inductor to reverse
bias the model. \\fhen used in a circuit these effects are normal
and ~ccount for the internal inductance capacitance. The
o~Bo1 10E7,Rz
A
O,GM1
c
I
Gl ,c2
o,v2..=..
I , ,
I
I
/
I
--------- ------r------, ..,, , \
0,-GMl
R2
lOEB
R4
I
I y
/ I
I I
,
,
10E8 10.001
\-
I
R3 lOEB
s I
Rl lOEB
0,-11
I Rs I
'- I
' "-l.... .._ IS2 ---
-==.. vl v2
Figure 3 Hodel 1
R7 lOEB
0\
12.50.- ·I l ' . - r 1 l· . I i
11.25
h!ClUl:':lll~: Vd t;"·~:.:c X-A~tual Vnlu2s ;fot i '
i
0-Ar:t•Jal Vnl~t::<;' :for 1}~· c r~; r- ;~ i 1';2 ~· v~o 1. t~_:~gc ·--.
10.00
8.75
-tl)
~ 7.50 H I ~ \_ j I
H I H . ! H
6.25 ~ -
• 'j·•- ~--·
i
I
-~--1, -~-·-D(~~drcd ,values
! · I l . t -~~--------~ --- ~--1----· I ' ; . I . l ;· .. 1 '
t. I i i-· -------~-- r --~- -· ---~-~· _____ ..._ ----~-
\ j l i . i
[ ___ ~i~-- J: · ~- _1_L __ (_~~- --J. __ l .... J .... ~-- J I ! ..
· 1 · ' t I ! i i _______ ) ____ -·---·. ·r --- - +------
i
---i
--~--·
~
£:1 ~ 5.00 ~ ::J u
, I' i I ! . I - . ·---- ----- -:------~--- -- ~--- --· - ..
i I
3.75 r >f
I
2. soL / I
·I
. ~ --· . ~·
-~~.·: i ! ,, '
; ¥
1. 25
--~
-
' i 0 II ! I :
,.-~=~--t.~'"'""""'"--~·--'""-.......1-,.~~-'"':J"'--_...I ___ ;,._.o-,. -~ ... -L~_-L.- 1 I -·.. 1 cr. ,...t..-.~..,..~• .. '" -..l...--~-,_~, ... _._t_._ . .-~~.;.:.~.a:a~-,. .. --.J 0 .03 .06 .09 .12 .15 .18 .21 .24 .27 .30 .33 .36 .39 .42 ·''5 .48 .......,
VOLTAGE (VOLTS)
Figun• ( H-c1~1 1 Cun·cnt-Vo1t<Jg,' Curve
8
results of the ECAP program using this data are shown in Figure 4.
The results verify that the desired curve has been generated. How-
ever when compared with the actual device current-voltage curve
of Photograph 1, the model is seen to represent the actual device
rather inaccurately as expected.
The second model shown in Figure 6 with the current-voltage
curve in Figure 5 represents a modified straight line approxi-
mation of the current-voltage curve of the actual device which
will give a more exact approximation of the actual device charac-
teristic.
""' (/) I QJ :.... Ip QJ p.. i3 <il ......
,.....; ,.....; .... z
'-"
H z w ~ ~ ~ u
I Iv I
' \
' \
' ' '
v3
VOLTAGE (millivolts)
I
/
I
I
I
v
Figure 5 Model 2 Current-Voltage Characteristic
The conductance G1 shown in Figure 6 provides the positive
slope line from (0,0), to (Vl,Ip)• Switch S2 changes Gl and
switches in the current source -II to provide the constant current
line from (V1 ,Ip) to (V2,Ip)• Switch S3 then turns on the con-
s
10E7,R5
R9
0.001
A
c
I
I
I I r
,...r-•S2 "' I
~
vl-=- 0,12
V3-=. V4
Figure 6 Hodel 2
,._.ss t
RIO 10E8
\0
trolled current source -GM1 controlled by current in R4. This
provides the negative slope line from (V2 ,IP) to (V 3,IP). The
constant current line for (VJ,Iv) to (V4,lv) is generated with
10
GM1 controlled current source controlled by R3 current, and current
source Iz being turned on by switch S4. The conductance G2 turned
on by switch SS generates the positive slope line from (V4,Iv).
The model is discussed in more detail in Appendix II.
The ECAP data in TABLE II describes the model of Figure 6.
TABLE II Model 2 ECAP Data
Transient Analysis Bl N(l,2), R=(l0E7,0.36) B2 N(2,0), G=(O.l61,1E-8) B3 N(2,0), R=l0E8, E•-0.0618, I•(0,-0.01) B4 N(2,3), R=l0E8 BS N(3,0), R=O.OOl, E•-0.0682 E6 N(2,0), R=l0E8 B7 N(2,4), R=l0E8 BS N(4,0), R:O.OOl, E=-0.249 B9 N(2,0), R=l0E8, !•(0,0.00905) BlO N(2,0), G=(lE-8,0.0887), E•-0.408 Bll ~(2,0), C=27E-12 Bl2 N(S,l), L=O.SE-9 Bl3 N(2,3), R=l0E8 c ****************************************************** C These three cards describe the voltage generator to C give the voltage sweep for determining the model V-A C characteristic. Bl4 N(O,S), R=30, E=(l.S,O) Bl5 N(S,O), C=O.OSE-6 Bl6 N(5,0), R=l0E8, E=(-0.45,0) c ****************************************************** Tl B(4,6), GM=(0,-0.0492) T2 B(l3,9), GX=(0,0.0492) Sl B=l, (1), OFF S2 B=3, (2,3), OFF 53 B=S, (4,6), OFF S4 B=8, (9,13), OFF SS B=lO, (10), OFF S6 B-16, (14,16), OFF
When determining the current-voltage characteristic of this
-til ~ H ~ ~ H :E -~ I'Ll
~ :::> u
---- --~----~~ .. l· -:---·r---f--r--~1--:r -,-- T --,~- 1 , 1 · · · -! ]-- -~-- '. : ! it-Actu.ril. ~ahwr. :For Iricl:easing Voltage ..
12.50 !" '. "! ·····;
11.25
j4.
10.00 __
s.75r __ f; -- .. ~"'
i •, I
7.50 I· :- ·'\.-------!--I
! X
6.25 -- -- -·----------- -
5.00 ;
I l
i
3. 75 L )f:,
j :-
I ct> 2.50
1.25
OL ..1 --'-- :
0 .03 .06 .09 .12 .15 .18
Figu,·C' 1 Hodf•l 2 Curn!nt-Voltngc Curve
t I I ' ' ' L -~ __ i. ...... -~_, ___ 0-llctual _ _values for Dc~crnas{ng Vo1.t<J.ge
. : ' j I'. ' I ' . i ' ! :, - f - - - .. . I I I . ___ _,__ . D ' • < It~ 1 I j
l'- ··t···----·---·-·· 1- . ; _ ---~· gs1..rca l-.a ues ____ ,_ + __ • __ ~ . l I . , r . . . • r· I . : I . . I ' ; . I
I - : ; I I l -:·;---· :--- ~--- - ---~ -- --:·--- I .. T- ·:-lt -T .. ' ~--_- : --~----r . ---- -, --------- ! .. ' l . ' f. : I ' -·- . -.; - ,'.: -. ·----1 -. . I . . .:. I .....
I l · ! 1 · ! •- ~ · •- • ! - • - : >. :-- · i i .. • ·r-· -:-~--~----:---~ ---- -,.-- ·,;--· .. ---~ ~-T ---1-----~------r -- :·---+ -~----+,~--·-·:-:· ---, ' I . I ·- . I . . I ' , -- --, . --- --- -- --. --- -1-- -- - . -+ I --. -- .. ---- --- --- i --------- -I ! I l :. . , ; : \
[ I ' . ' ! - ., . . I ;. i ' .
··}, .. -i : .. ( :---~'----~--- ~~ T--~}---~ r-~--: -·-·:--- :1·-·t·-·t~~-::·---- - ·-:· -; -- :·- - - -:--· .. ---:------ --:·- ·t . ------ ---'-- ---~ ... - --,---
1 j . 1 : : . l I : . I -:- -----. ;----~ .-- -·-- r----·- ----i· ----~----- t ·---------·.L ---~~. l--T---
! I I ~ i i , : ' ! ! J
; ~----i ___ L--·-----'-~---1 .. __ L~- J. __ i ; I I ; 'I : .,1 ; I t !' f I · · t ~ ' i ;_ -· -.. :- 1 - :-: I . . I· : - -:.
: j - .... ! - _:_:.__L ___ ~---I ..•. __ j ___ _j_ ... _
--·-
I .)
I !
l l . --~
! ---..,
I : I l 1 · i : ,. ·1 - l
--- _____ ! :----- - --- ___ L_ I : I I
... : :J -~-- . l I I ' ! J i
: ~-~~e-x '!Y j
l l • ( l : L-~--~----~--~~--~~~~~--~~~~~--~-----~
.21 .24 .27 • 30 .33 .36 • 39 .42 .45 .48
VOLTAGE (VOLTS)
.-
..... .....
model as with the first model, the capacitor and inductor must be
rc~oved and replaced with an open and short respectively. Bll
and Bl2 should be changed as follows:
Bll N(2,0), R=l0E8 Bl2 N(S,l), R=O.OOl
The results of the ECAP program using the second model are
shown in Figure 7. The results verify that the desired curve
has been generated. In comparison with Photograph 1, the current-
voltage curve of the actual device, it is evident that this rrodel
does give a more exact approximation of the actual device character-
is tic.
A third model is shown in Figure 9 and its current-voltage
curve in Figure 8 uses resistor-capacitor time constant effects
to eliminate the straight lines and sharp corners of the other
two w~dels.
,__ I ! ~ I ~
Ip r ~ ~ ~ E ~ I ~
~
~ ~
E '-'
~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ u
v p
~---
v
VOLTAGE (millivolts)
v
I
I I
I
I
I
v
Figure 8 Model 3 Current-Voltage Characteristic
12
,
A G1
Vz,O
c
---------------------, ,. ' ----- - ~/- ..... -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - _,_ ... "<""- - -
_, I '(- - - - \ '
I I I I
I
' ' Rz S2 I .. /, 10E8
' I
v1 ,o _
--..!-
cl
R3 10E8
S5
v2-=-
' ' ' ' -..,- -,-- .-... , ' ' ,-~~ 1 ~
S4f" -1- - ·Its· .01,-10E8
--- '
R4 lOEB
L. ' '
' 'l', ' ....
' ' I
O,Vs -
'' I ' I ' \
\ '
-- ·--I I
,'Rs to S31--- , 10E8
' I ~
v4 ,o-=-
2E-12 .... - - __
---
Rg
1 0ER, .01
RlO 100,
. 01
'
I I
\
\
\
~
_cz .OSE-6
c3 1. s,o - 0, t I .875
Figure 9 Model 3
Gz
..... lo)
The conductance c1 provides the curve from (0,0) to {Vp.Ip).
The negative slope portion of the characteristic from {Vp,Ip) to
(Vv,Iv) is generated when Sl turns on the -BETA controlled cur-
rent source, controlled by current in G2, switch S2 turns off
Rg to provide the remainder of the curve from {Vv,Iv)• This
completes the characteristic for increasing voltage. However
this model unlike Models 1 and 2, uses a different portion of
the circuit for decreasing voltage. S4 and SS turned on during
increasing voltage but are used for the decreasing portion of the
curve. ~~en the voltage reaches the maximum and starts to decrease
switch S3 turns off. C2 is allowed to charge up again increasing
current in G2,decreasing it in controlled current source. When
switch SS turns off as the voltage decreases the C2 capacitor stops
charging up discharge reducing current in G2 and increasing current in
c1 . This action is what gives the characteristic its premature
rise of current. This will be discussed in greater detail in
Appendix II.
The ECAP coding of TABLE III describes the model of Figure 9.
The results of ECAP program using the third model are shown
in Figure 10. This model for increasing voltage duplicates the
actcal device closely, however, there is a large discrepancy on
retracing the curve for falling voltage.
The first two models shown use the same components to approxi
mate the tunnel diode during the rising and falling of voltages.
The third model, however, uses part of its elements during rising
voltages and part during falling voltage. In selecting one of
these models, the desired accuracy is the basic criterion.
14
15
TABLE III Model 3 ECAP Data
Tra~sient Analysis El N(l,2), L=0.8E-9 E2 N(2,3), R=0.36 B3 N(3,0), G=0.154 B4 N(3,0), R=l0E8, E=(-0.355,0) B5 N(3,0), R=l0E8, E~(-0.065,0) B6 N(3,0), C=27E-l2 B7 N(3,0), R=l0E8, E=-0.355 B8 N(3,0), R=l0E8, E=(-0.408,0) B9 N(3,8), R=(O.Ol,lOES), E=(0,-0.45) BlO N(S,O), C~2E-12 Bll N(0,4), R=(lO,lOE8), Ec(l.5,0) Bl2 N(4,5), R=(lOES,O.l) Bl3 N(5,6), R=(0.1,10E8) Bl4 N(7,6), R=(lOO,O.Ol) Bl5 N(9,7), R=(l0E8,0.01) Bl6 N(0,9), R=(lOE8,19), E=(0,0.875) Bl7 N(6,0), C=O,OSE-6 BlS N(6,0), G=0.308 c ****************************************************** C These three cards describe the voltage generator to C give the voltage sweep for determining the model V-A C characteristic. El9 N(O,l), R=(l0,10E8), E=(l.S,O) B20 N(l,O), C=O,OSE-6 B2l N(l,O), R=l0E8, E=(-0,45,0) c ****************************************************** Tl B(l8,3), BETA=(0,-0.8) Sl B~S, (3,5,12,18), OFF S2 B=4, (4,11,13), OFF S3 B=lO, (9,16), ON S4 B=S, (8,15), OFF S5 B=7, (14), OFF S6 B=21, (19,21), OFF
-tf) ~ H
:3 ~ '-"
H
£5 ~ u
I ~0:
.~· , ..
i
20
10
0
tJ 0
i-
·0
0
X-~, •
od ~: 0
0
',-
i 0
Q
o:
~:.~- /;, (: i: \ i '\";·I • • r~ ~i" L ~ ·' ...
.O~~l: <<H-r."' v.:,_l 1-.-.-..:. t·; I t)r
-:~ .. ~ :; ;_ rt:::~3 v ~31 t~~ ~
0 (l
·o i I r
0
X )(
ln~r~a~i~~ Volt~GC
n :'~; :.:. ~,.~ <; ;.·~ f~ i -: ~ fJ . '-' n 1 t g ~', (! ~
0
X 0
i.
0
'0
X
·o
0
0, i I
X
'---------., ___________________________ , _ t ________ t __ ______j__ _____ L ____ _______~ _ .__ ___ ,L_ ___ ___j__ ___ ,L ____ j____ __ ___,c__ L_ ___ t__ __ __._ __
.03 . 06 .09 • 12 .15 .18 .21 • 211 .n • 30 .33 • 36 • 39 .42
VOLTACE (VOLTS) Figure JD }·lfldel 3 Cttncrll -Voltar,e CuJ:VQ
_l_ __ _
.45 .'J8
..... 0'\
17
III. MODELS IN CIRCUIT APPLICATIONS
All three models were tested in various tunnel diode
circuits. A relaxation oscillator circuit Figure 11 and astable
multivibrator circuit Figure 12 were used •
301
.l
5.9 ~
. OOOSE-6 I 1-----...,
TD r---..... ~----1
TD-19
22 .OOOSE-6
Figure 11 Relaxation Oscillator
jlE-3
In the operation of the relaxation oscillator the output
volta6C initi8lly jumps to a level of approxim~tely .4 volts.
The voltage decays during which time the tunnel diode voltage is
increasing. ~1en the tunnel diode voltage reaches peak volt
the output voltage goes negative due to the effect of the capacitor
inductor circuit. At the same time the tunnel diode voltage has
increased to greater than valley voltage (Vv). The output voltage
decays and when the tunnel diode voltage decays to valley voltage
the output voltage jumps positive and repeats. This circuit
output voltage is shown in Photograph 3.
0
18
~ I
"~ \ I 1
v \
Photograph 3 (traced) Oscillator Output Voltage Waveform
VOLTAGE-0.2v/cm TIME-20u sec/em
l \
l
I \ - --~
I .
'
I I
~-~
T I 1
I -.J
I
~I I ~ .. ---
Photograph 4 (traced) Hul ti vibrator Output Vol ta~;e I.Javeforn
VOLTAGE-O.Sv/cm TTI1E-2u sec/ em
25.5 lE-3
.26
TD
D-13
19
Figure 12 Astable Xultivibrator
In the operation of the astable multivibrc::.tor the outp~t
voltage is zero volts to start out. It stays low until this
tunnel diode voltage reaches peak voltage (Vp) then the o~tput
voltage goes straight up past valley voltage (Vv) due to inductor
actio~. The voltage stays high until it has decayed to Vv then
the voltage drops down to zero and it repeats. The waveform for
this circuit output voltage shown on Photograph 4.
The ECAP aata for Model 1 is shown in TABLE IV. The output
wav~fot'"m for the oscillator circuit, the voltage versus tix:1c c::.t
node 6, is shown in Figure 13.
?he output waveform in Figure 13 approximates the actual
device output voltage at the beginning but failed to go into
oscillation.
The ECAP dat::a for Model 2 is show-n in TABLE V. The output
waveform for the oscillutor circuit, the voltage versus tirce ut
node 6 is shown in Figure 14.
20
TABLE IV Model 1 Oscillator ECAP Data
Transient An.:llysis Bl !.'1(1,2), R=(l0E7 ,0,36) E2 N(2,6), G=(O.l54,0.058), E=(0,-0.355), I= (0,-0. 00095) E3 I\(2,6), R==l0E8 B4 N(2,3), R=l0E8 ES N(3,6), R=O.OOl, E=-0.065 B6 N(2,6), R=lOES, E-0. 355 B7 N(2,6), C=27E-12 BS N(4,1), L=0,8E-9 B9 N(2,3), R==l0E8 rno N(4,0), R=22 Ell N(5 ,4), R=30l Bl2 N(0,5), R=O.l, E=5.9 Bl3 N(L;,6), C=O.OOOSE-6 Bl4 N(6,0), C=0,0005E-6 3:!.5 N(6,0), L=lE-3 Tl B(9,2), GH=(O,O.l85) ~') .1._ B(Ll,3), GM=(0,-0.185) Sl B=l, (1), OFF S2 B=5, (3,4)' OFF S3 B=6, (2, 9) ' OFF
The output waveform of Figure 14 approximates the actual
device output until the first diode switch tries to turn on at
p.:ak voltage (Vp)· Then the switch oscillates for the remainder
of the test.
The ECA? data for Hodel 3 is shown in TABLE VI. The
output wavcfo::r:. for the oscillator circuit, voltage versus
timz at node 10, is shown in Figure 15.
-tf)
~ ~ -~ ~
.s
.4
• 3
• 2
.1
'-··
" . .
'
. .. . ' ·'-
··. . '
1
'• ··. '@...._
j
'l ..
.. .. ~
,. .. ....... .....
I -' - .; ' ! .
3 4 Ot f----f
-.1
-.2
-.3
-.4
-.5
Figure 1~ Model 1 OGciJl;
~
5 6
I . i
i j
j ..
i .. I ..
~
,, ! ' I
i j i -- ... ;· ··-·
9 lO
c: - ( ·:c· :;· L~ ~- (~ ·;~ ~~ :-:. :~- ;1
,.~~(.; !: t:
' ~ i ,_ .
' '0 ... -I
I ·-·-· i i
11 12 1
Gi.tCL:i.t d~:::;..:
I I
L I r· i
,_ i
-+--
H
--<.::>
1---+ I --+S -1---. -{-------. : "l •••• •' ................. . I i I . • • ··C'···· .... '
r J •• ,.~•·••••• ... .... ..... •"" ..
' ... . ··
/.
i/
i -/cr"' . !/
/,
TlHE (lo-5 seconds) Output Havcfon11
../
.......
I ...0""
/
N .......
B2
36 E7 .. 'If"'\
.JO
B9 BlO
Bl2 El3 Bl4 Bl5 51.6 Bl7
Dl9
T2 Sl
S3 S4 S5
TABLE V Hodel 2 Oscillator ECAP Data
Transient A;.1alysis N(l,2), R=(l0£7,0.36) K(2,6), G=(0.161,1E-8) K(2,6), R=lOES, E=-0.0618 N(2,3), R=l0E8 N(3,6), R=O.OOl, E=-0.0682 N(2,6), R=l0E8 K(2,L;), R::::lOE8 N(4,6), R~O.OOl, E=-0.249 N(2,6), R=lOES, 1=(0,0.00905) N(2,6), G=(lE-8,0.0887), E=-0.408 N(2,6), C=27E-12 N(S,l), L=0.8E-9 N(2,3), R=l0E8 N(7,5), R=30l N(5,0), R=22 ~(0,7), R=O.l, E=5.6 N(5,6), C=O.OOOSE-6 N(6,0), C::::O.OOOSE-6 N(o,O), L=lE-3 B(4,6), GH=(0,-0.0492) B(l3,9), GN=(0,0.0492) B=l, (l), OFF B=3, (2,3), OFF B=5, (4,6), OFF B=B, (9,13), OFF E==lO, (10), OFF
22
The output waveform in Figure 15 approximates the actual
circuit waveform. The difference in amplitude and frequency is
due to the different source voltage used in the ECAP model
~nd the &ctual circuit.
The ECAP data for Xode1 1 is shown in TABLE VII. The
output w~veform for the multivibrator circuit, voltage versus
time at node 6 is shown in Figure 16.
-tl)
H t-1 0 :> ........
. _';
• I}
.3
.2
• 1
·. . ' ..
" "
. . . ' "
.. ··. . '0 ..._
.. .. .. • • a I ··... r .. ---. ... ,/:_ '
--. .-..... --v
r
' f
I '
! l i i I ! : ~ -· --I I
s~,..i 1~ch :2 ()n.t.i.ll.t:d"';:''-l (}:\
Vo)· Pc·;t;"dt~tk1." Of l'(':;i:.: .
~-i ' I
I J
'r. " ' ~ '.·1 t .-,:
r
_:ct::t _C:!:rc~·;i,t
~ -1 --·! !
' ! 1-- " • .. ,! "i
dt.t;~
~~! ~d Off . '0_
.......; - ....... - --:--0 L
I......,_
·l 1
I l
n (.!.i
0 1-----~-- .. l-----1---f-- ~-<" I -1--------~- .. --+---+·--._ ... J
f (.; . 1 :,::.. . -
-.2
-.3
-.4
-.5
::, "! .l I~
,. _l 7 ~
I I ;
1/
i i/
,/ --:-
0/ / '
/ /
/ /
/
c{
i TIME (lo-5 seconds)
Figure 1~ Mod0l 2 Oscill~tor Outpvt Waveform
J (, I J • 1 ·:; J -~ :I 1. •• "
i ,.....&
J 'r J ,. :) ~ ,
N w
,,-
B3 _, D'-}
BS
B7 BS B9 BlO Ell Bl2 :213
Bli' :2.:~ 8 :::::.9 320 E2l E22 B23 324 Tl Sl. S2 S3 S4 S5
:'AELE VI Hodel 3 Oscillator ECAP Data
Tr;::.sient .\nalysis N(l,2), L=0.8E-9 N(2,3), R==0.36 ~(3,10), G=0.154 N(3,0), R=l0E8, E=(-0.355,0) N(3,0), R=l0E8, E=(-0.065,0) K(3,10), C=27E-12 K(3,10), R=l0E8, E=-0.355 N(3,0), R=l0E8, E=(-0.408,0) N(3,S), R=(O.Ol,lOES), E=(0,-0.45) K(3,l0), C~2E-12 N(l0,4), R~10,10~3), E~(l.5,0) ~(4,5), R=(lOE8,0.1) K(5,6), R=(O.l,lOES) N(7,6), R=(lOO,O.Ol) N(9,7), R=(lOES,O.Ol) N(l0,9), R=(lOI::8,10), E=(0,0.875) N(6,10), C=O.OSE-6 N(6,10), G=O.JOS N(l ,0), R==22 N(ll,l), R=501 i\(0,1:!.), R=O.l,E-5.9 N(l,lO), C=O.OOOSE-6 :~(10,0), C=O.OOOSE-6 K(lO,O), L=lE-3 3(13,3), E~TA~(0,-0.8) B=5, (3,5,12,18), OFF 3=4, (!>,11,13), OFF B""lO, (9,16), ON n~S, (3,15), OFF B""7, (14), OFF
The ou'::put ~·;<:vefoi'ill in F::.gu:-e 16 approximates the actual
d~vice ou~put voltage very closely.
The ECAP dat<:! for }loC:.::!l 2 is shown in TABLE VIII.
output waveform for the nultivibrator, voltage versus time at
node 5 is shown in Figure 17.
24
-tl:l f-4 .... , 0 :> ._, w L~
~ ... ~ p ~
5 ·-
4
.'\
' ' '
,. '
i G
' I. ' I '-.
;:t._." [·.~~-!~ .1.
i ....... : Tcr.~·. Cl::r_.~_:.~ L r'::
' l ! .
........
' ' ... ' ' i ....... _
(.:) ··~ -...
1 --..;_
h •:;
-- -... . .---·_ ... ::::J
I I ,.. I
!
.. !
-'
. )
0 t _; ____ ;:_ ___ _j _____ --11-------- I I
~~ L J c 7 !-----~--: -~---·---!-·-~·
B ~? H• --+---+qr-----4
l 'l .....
-1
-3
-4
-5
J
/ /
..
' / /
/
/ /'
/ /
_,.")
//
TIME (lo-S seconds) Figure 15 Hodel 3 Osd J ];>Lor Oul)1Ul t·!;.-..-~- fon1
,. I I
........... t\>..__
:
........._ i-.....--.. ! -~ .. ----·-.. -0
1? 13 J_{; 1~, J{:' --l-----1·---1---·1-----
N V•
Tl.;.):E VII ~1odel 1 Multivibrator ECAP Data
Tr~~sient Analysis 31 N(l,2), R=(lOE7,1.7) 32 N(2,0), G~(O.Ol54,0.0058), E=(0,-0.355), I=(0,-0.000095) S~ N(2,0), R~lOES 34 N(2,3), R=l023 BS ~(3,0), ~=0.001, E=-0.065 36 N(2,0), R=l0E8, E=-0.355 57 N(2,0), C=3.5E-12 ES N(4,1), L=O.SE-9 [g ~(2,3), R=lOES B:J N(5,4), L=lE-3 Ell N(6,5), R=25.5 Bl2 :~(0,6), R==O.Ol,E==0.26 Tl B(9,2), G}l=(O,O.Ol85) 'I'2 B(4,3), GH=(0,-0.0185) s: B~l, (1), OFF S2 E:::5, (3,4), OFF 53 B=6, (2,9), OFF
TABLE VIII Model 2 Multivibrator ECAP Data
El B2 33
E5 B5
Tra:.:.sient ;:-.!(1,2), N(2,0), )1(2,0), N ( ? -) _,j '
N(3,0), N(2,0),
Analysis R= (lOE7, 1. 7) G:::(O.Ol61,1E-8) R=l0E8, E=-0.0618, R""l0E8 R=O,OOl, E=-0.0682 R""lOES
37 N(2,4), R=lOES :.:-3 , r-:(L,,O), R::..:O.OOl, E=-0.249
I= (0 ,-0. 001)
:)9 :,(2,0), R::.:lOES, !=(0,0.000905) ;~::.0 :H2,0), G=(lS-3,0.00887), E::o-0.408 ~~l ~(2,0), C=3.5S-12 ~l2 ~(S,:), L=0.8S-9
015 ::C.l6
S3 S4 S5
N\2,3), :\.::..:1028 ::\(6,5), !...=lE-3 v17 6) R""25.5 ... \ ' 5I
N, .,7), ~=O.Ol,E~0.26 .• ~L;,6), GN=(0,-0.00492) DC3,9), GA:-:(0,0.00492) I3z:o l , (l ) , 0 FF D=3, (2~3), OF::' B= 5 , (Lf • 6 ) , 0 YF :S""-3, (9, 1.3), OFF E=lO, (10), OFF
26
I I
.. . . '·
/ /
-I
I I
.· . . :
.. / . .
j )U
I I
/
.. /
: :
:
. / 0
/
: . .
: . . /
-• .1_
.• -··
':. . ':. . • .
~ \ \ \ •' . . :
\ \ ·. \ L.7
. .
... ! I I j l ! I ..; '
·. '
\ . . ...
.... , . I "l I _! j l '
\ I
c -: l
\ j
\I ... l I l I ~
··~ i C· ._
\': I •.
\ : . \ : \ .... l _, ' I I I \ ·..
: . ...
\..._
!'
\ ·. ' ".1
---·-·------------------~~----------------~~----------------~~-----------------l------------------~\0 0
(SJ.10A)
~:)V~'IOA
0 ..... 0
~ ....
i 0 ' (.
/ / /
f\' .· : : I I
. . I .. :
4 . . . / :
/ /
/
'···
(""; N
(SJ.'1CA
) 3::)V
.L10A
0 \
/':
/
·. \
. _
,/
: ,..-
·. \ \
28
·::;
.)
u-. i ! .....
I -l ~
l ..... I j
("")
.....
~ <"'-;
-.... --0 .....
\ ...J
c-
\ \ ~
c.:;
\ : ,; \~
1'
! -; ..0
! I -· ""'
-1 ..::-
-....... \ : \ · •. \ -~
-N
\
,. \ : \
~.
\:. ,.....
. \ \ . I • 0
.... 0
..0
I c
~~
0
29
The output w.:veiorm in Figure 17 ap?ro::drr.atcs t:•e actu;:;l
C.cvic.a ou-cput voltage, however, like l·!o~cl 2 on the osci.llutor
circuit, the first switch at tunnel diode peak voltage oscill~ted
for approximately half of the program before continuing.
IV. CGXCLUSIOl\S
These thre.:! rr:oclcls are simila~ in th~:t they all cha:tge
current lev~ls to simulate the tu~nel diode curve. They are
riifferent in complexity and also in the type of elements used to
ch~nge the current.
Hodel 1, the three section piecewise-linear model, is the
sir:1pliest of the three. The eleme:1t used in generating the
c~~ren~-volt~ge curve is the dependent current source. The curve
is generated by switching in or out the proper dependent current
element. The clata plotted in Figure 4 shows that the rr.odel
dis?lays the negative resista~ce regie~ and accurately follows
specif~ed path for increasing and decreasing voltage.
}:odel 2, tue five section piecewise-linear model, is similar
:.:o I·:oC:cl 1 using straight 1::.~'1es, although, it more closely
3L~:...::i3teci the actual tunnel diode current-voltage characteristic.
Eoc;~l 2 switc~es both dependent &nd independent current sources in
o-:: Ol't or tl-;e ci:::cuit to generate its curr~:J.t-volt.:ge curve. The
c~t~ plvtted i~ Figure 7 shows th~t the ffiOdel d~?licates the desired
curv.:; for bo·.:::h incrcasir.g and deere.:;:; ing vol ta:;cs.
'!-~odel 3 has C! sn.ooth current-voltage curve .:s o·?;:;os..:;d to
ou: current g2ncratcd from an RC circuit. The CC!ta plo:t~J i:l.
r:..zt.re lO shm.;s the r.1odel ~s simulating a portion of the d.:;sired
c~::vc for volt.;::ge up to valley voltage then the model deviates
:Zror" ;;he desired curve, althout;h, it still looks like a tunnel
31
diode for increasing voltage. The model can simulate a device
~..r.1.:;::.-e the dec::ea::;ing voltage is not ~sed. The characteristic for
~~creasing voltage looks like a tunnel diode curve but again
differs considerably from the desired c~rve. The reason for
the difference is due to the met~od of selecting the parameters.
C~ t~is rr~del it was done by a t::.-ial and error rr£thod. Parameter
selection is covered in more detail in Appendix II.
To verify the operation of the ~odels in circuits, data
~•.:.s ;:a:(en on Hodels 1, 2 and 3 in a relaxi!tion oscillator and
H.::ccls 1 .:.~1d 2 in an astable multivibrator. Due to the method
of switching in and out the curreat in Hodel 1 and 2, the tir.1.e
step must be selected in relationship to the sr.~allest tir;:c
co~st~r.t of the circuit. If the tir.~e step is too large the
s\o.r:..::ch will oscillate. This problem existed on Hodels 1 and 2
~,;.'-1til the ti:.1.:; step was select~d in the range of lE-9 to
l.2-l.l. J:'~1is grea·::ly extei.1ds the cooputer time reGuiring c.n
I-:0t..:.:- ;:a ~~:.1 .:1 ?ro;:;r.:;m of 10-100 micros..::conds. Eodcl 3 using
cu-.:~·"-::.t ge:ner.:ltccl in a::1 RC ci:::-cuit does not have the s.:.r::e pro~ l~r.:
_;: ~~c switches, sine~ tho nature of RC ci:::-cuits is a ~ore gradual
c~~~~c, this a~lows Xodel 3 to use a large ti~e step, ~n the
~an~c o£ 2.53-6 a~d thereby reduce the corr.pute:::- time requi::~c.
7~c ~~ta plotted for Xodcl 1 in the oscillator circuit,
~igurc 13 s:;o'"'"' t!1e out:;...;t voltage as st.:trting as the actual
ciJ:c~it ?hotor_;rapi"! 3 however, it does not go into oscillatio:-t.
~he voltaze used in the ECAP program is 5.9 volts which i» the
32
a~cu&l ci~cuit was at upper threshold of oscilla~ion. The ~o~cl
s2~r.:~ to be f.n.;r£crt.1ing as expcct..;d, und if t:~e circuit wa5 r2Tu:1.
using a lom::r v.:>ltagc such as 5.6 or 5.3 volts the output voltagC!
~ould oscillate similar to the actual device volta~e.
Th~ data plotted in Figure 16 for Model 1 in the nultivibrator
c::. :.:-.::cit s::,J';vs the r:.odel performing as expected. Cor:tparing tr.e
plotted results to Photograph 4, Model 1 doE:s simulate the tunr.el
diode, in the nultivibrator circuit.
T~e data plotted in Figure 14 for Model 2 in the oscillator
c~rcuit shows that the nodel goes ~nto switch oscillatio~ at
·.::.:.:-.::cl diode peak voltage the first switching of a current
.;;lc~.:.::.nt. and does<•' t get past the switcr .• The data plotted for Nodzl 2
..... I:',ultivibrator circuit shown in Figu.:-e 17 sho\.JS tha SO.lT.e preble:::
as t:1.;;: osc!.llation circuit. In the r.ml ti vibrator circuit the
s-v;,::.tch S2 .:>;;;cillatecl until. the current in the tunnel diode in-
~~~~sed enough to supply the current source and the re~aining
c:c~2~t~. Then ~h~ program procced~d. After that point the c~del
s!~ul~t~3 th~ first portion of the actual waveform in Photogr~~h 4.
:s b~:~~ cliv~ded with other ~lcm~nts. The current availa~!e f~o~
L~~ v0~ta~c source is lc~3 than required by the currc~t source
~cc with the series inductance in the circuit, the capacitor is
::-,c only e lcmcnt that the current source can draw the current
.... ·, ~ . -.)
L ',.___
i::.:.:t:.ctot· is rc:-.:ovcd f::-or.1 th.:! circ ·.;it tb.: c~.;rrcnt sou::-ce cc"Jlc
r~ceive ~ll its current fron the volt~gc source 3r1d sho~.;ld ~ot c.:.::
switch osc~ll~tion.
M0J2l 3 w~s only tested in the oscill~tor circuit bccau~c
t~~ ~od~l ~~s only set up for the ~J-19 ci::-cuit. T~e cethod of
The dat& plotted in Figure 15 shows th~t
t~~t ci=cuit Yill oscill~te and ::-c?r.:.:scnts the actual diode &s shown
circuit voltage used en the circuit.
:iocicl l si:.:1ulates the tur.nel diode in t he ci::-cui:s te s ted.
T~·, .:; ;·:.o.::.e.:.. is sir.~ple c.lthough, it required considcr.::ble cc:-::puter
ti;-;:e to run each circuit.
~oci~l 2 ~id co: give accc?t~blc results, .::lthough, wich
- . - . . ~·.:o c.~:.:. c~ ~ :.ci-:s it coulJ ope~.::te .::s i:1tcndcd.
:-::cC:.ific~tion is to re::-.ove the s;:;rics inductor (L ;:; )
..... ~· _ .., .., • l - · ... ... .__ .. ~.,...~...;._ ... .
. -. -· -~,.... -· , -lt,..--l.... .......... ~o.o.
, • • ,.... _l . ' .... V\..'-- to scl(;ct
calcula~ing time versus cocputer tirr.e.
? a r z. r.:e ~ c r s .
o.-.c possible
A??ENDIX I
SL~~RY OF MODELING OF ACTIVE DEVICES
FOR COXPUTER-AIDED CIRCUIT DESIGN
34
35
Cor:<putcr-Aided Ci::-cuit Ar.alysis is one of the f&st cx·?;:.;-,ciir.g
L~CS Of the COmputers of today. X~ny progra~S ~~Ve been written
to analyze or design electronic circuits. Many were designed
<=.-. ·-~=· f , r ~ ~,-,. · Fil r~l ~v~ one spec~~~c purpose; or exam?~e, ~ow-l'ass ~~~l?tlc · tcrl-'.
Band Pass Ladder Crystal Filter Dcsign[4], Poles and Zeros of
k~plifier Transfer Functionsf4,ll], Flip Flo? Worst Case Dcsign[3l,
Ir:.vertcr \cJorst Case Design(3], Envior:-;;ental Resistance Inherent
L'- Equipr.:.:::nt [ L,] and m..:rr:"'rous others.
S..::;;ne p::-ograms of a more general n.:1ture have been developed
that c.::n be used to analyze many kinds of circuits, sor::e such
progr.:.;:·.s arc Transistor Circuit Analysb (NET-1) [4,10], System
for Circuit Evaluation and Prediction of Transient Radiation Ei~cct
(;;CE?'.:X:.::) (13], Electronic Circuit Analysis of Electronic Circuits
Ali of ~he p~obrams, Doth S?~cific and ge~er~l, nust in so~~
0i. ~~s~lts of ~~y of these progr~~3 and the e:::fi.cie::;:c use of
c~2:~c~crist~cs. The ~odcls for resistors, capacitors, inducc0rs,
v0lta~c sources, and current sources are generally included as
36
stored models of the programs. Models for diodes, transistors
and other active devices are non-linear type. NET-1, SCEPTRE
and CI~CUS have some of these models stored in their programs.
Some programs, ECAP in particular requires the user to supply the
~odels. ECAP, while not handling the non-linear models, can still
approximate non-linear devices with piecewise-linear models.
Regardless of \vhich program is used, the models must be developed
~o simul~te these devices. A number of models have been developed
for the the diode. The primary difference in these various
~odels is the differe~t elements used to simulate the device
~nd the para~cters used for these various elements. These dif
ferenc.:!s arise from linearity or non-linearity of the uodel and the
accuracy re~uirc~. Diode current-voltage curves simulated by
various models are shown in Figure I-1.
I
-----.-----v A
A) Ideal
:B
B) Piecewise-Linear
I
=========..:!""'----- v
c C) Non-Linear
Figure I-1 Diode Current-Voltage Characteristic
37
The simple linear switching diode model[6J Figure I-2A
with large resistaace when the current is in the reverse direction
a~d small resistance when the current is in the forward direction
a?p~oximates the current-voltage curve of Figure I-lA. The more
corr:plex modcl[l] Figure I-2B which takes into account transi.tion
cavacitance diffusion capacitance, bulk, and leakage resistances,
and current source approximates the current-voltage curve of
Figure I-lB or I-lC. This model can be linear or non-linear
dcpendi~g on the values of the elements of the model. The more
coillplcx the model the more parameters must be supplied to simulate
a device.
A B
cd
~------~: (~------
1 I ,,.._, -----< ~----t
I (---Q
t~.--~i----ll c
Figure I-2 Diode Models
7te number and type of elem2n~s used in a model is a function
of tl:e a?proach taken to simulate the current-voltage relationship.
Gne approach is to use conventional elements to develo~ tte required
curren~-voltage curve without using the device parameters. An
alteraate approach is to use conventional elements to develop the
required current-voltage curve but use the device parameters plus
38
acditio:-.al measurements. This approach is used with the Ebers-H'oll
rnodelt4] Figure I-3.
Cse+cte etc
I j I
0 6 ' E c
__.,.. -<-
IE Ic
B
Figure I-3 Ebers-Moll Model
A thirci a?proach used in the developm~nt of the Beaufoy-Sparks
Ch~rgc Control model[4) Figure I-4 and the Linvill Lumped
rs 9 '4'J rr.ccielL • ,~ Figure I-5 is to approximate the current-voltag~
c-.;rvc by using conventional elements and by creating new elcn;;:nts
~s ~cquired. The new elements are used to simulate an internal
pi1ysical phcno;.:~enon. Beauioy-Spark.;; Charge Control model intra-
C:uccd the base store Sb element. Linvill Lu.'1lped model introduced
~:h:::-~e new ele::.1cnts' stor.::tnce se' diffusancc zd and combinance ••e·
The Linvill r.-:odel n:ost closely rcp:::-csents the physical device
phcno;~:.:!non, however the Ebe:;:s-Noll rr.odel is used most widely
:.-ccause r.o r.c\J circuit clements are required. This is an adv.o.:1tage
since the ele~ent values can be determined by measuring a typical
39
i.:nit or assured from the manufacturer's sheet.
.,.. Vn.,. OB/tc
.c. )>--+<r 8 ('
0
r r <> 0
I I I I I I
cbrco _L <:: 't:h~ etc.::: - ¢QB c ~c -.- ""Be---
' ~t -sc• ta l
l 1 I tB
I j
1 rbb
B Figure I-4 Beaufoy-Sparks Charge Control Model
~r -·or-----~Ill~-----~ ........L-
c
n(o) He
B
Figure I-5 Linvill Lumped Model
t,O
hrork has been done on a Zener Diode model [ 1 l fi rrure r-r.-~- v
by :.~.:>drfying Ebers-Xoll diode topology of Figu:::-e I-2B. This
mociel c~~ be linear or non-linear depending on the values of Ll
c ... ...
Fig~re I-6 Zener Diode ~odcl
Some work has been dor.e uith negative resist.:mce devices,
r • , D~~iclsl~J put forth several curve fitting methods for tunnel
d~cd~s by fitting the entire function with I(v) = Ave-ab +
··.~,·',::. .. ~1V - eb?vJ' + t'(eCV-1). Th" · · h f ~ - - - ~ LS equatLon lS t e su~ o the
t~~~cling curre~t, the d~ffusion current, and the excess curre~t,
::-cspi.O!ctivcly. Another method of representing the V-I charact~ristic
i~ to divi~c it into several zones and fitting the cu;:ve with a
'I'h.;:; A0 , A1, A2 •••• A11 are oi:ltained fron r::easured data.
I<.. H. Je>.J.sen and M.D. Liebcr:nann[7] in their book IE:-~
Elc:::tronic Circuit Analvsis P:--c..;:;r.::m T2chnigues and Applications
show a turned diode modeJ, for ECAP. See Figure I-7.
The n~del uses negative resistors to provide the negative
sl~:~.:;. T'!-.c capacitor is added to prevent the model from lockir.g
I
.. I
I --I s;~~
i ! -'- _._
41
I I I :
-,, T I '-· ---->----~------~-· ------<lo---.....J
! c
Figure I-7 Tunnel Diod8 }~odel
up. Lock U? can o.:.cur \vh.::n th.; model is switching to the ::cgativc
rcs:.:.sta:1ce at V,...., ao.:d C.ecrcasiag voltar~c causes the currcntr'
volt~gc curve to follow a decreasing voltage and increasing
current path instead of the desired curve. The cap3citor pre-
c
42
vents the voltage from decreasing .:;t VP point. This co::C:itio.:1
rcqui res that c.:;:re be taken in selecting the value for s:-:ur.t
c.::p.aci~or.
k1 ~dd~tional restriction i~ the selection of the ti~c-
s::ep. :'he parasitic ele~ncnts arc very l.n:J?ortant when conside-::-ing
the transie~t response of the model. The time-step oust be in
the range of the parasitic element time constant.
r ·:P L-J
D .. \l~:.EL> 2·~.E. (1957) D.:;\r~:lc:::~::::.-::t o~ l,~~t!1c~::.-'"~~t::cc::.. :-:vC:cla oi Scmiccnductor Davic~s foe Co~pu~erAided Circ~it D~si~n, Prccecdi~g of I~EE, vol. 55 no. 11, Novc;:i0er, p. 1913-1920.
::Ji~i·~~l Compt:t..::r P::o:Jr.2.:a. for Tr.c..1~sient l.r~ol:.lsis of E2:.c:c·:::ro"i1ics Ci::cuit (CI~1.CUS) (3/vS-1) Es2ris Gu!~e, S2=~tlc~ Washington, Roc~ns Co~?any, 1967.
--n. (196~) Co:~-;?-;;·~~r Prozr~r . .-:3 for C::::cuit DcsiGl1, Elcct::o-Tcch:.-"olo::,-y,. '\lOl. 73 no. 3, ::~.:n:ch,
p. 101-103, 162, 164.
(~.] l:"".~.l~:z, r~I. (1965) Co::~)t:tei..'" Pro~rL..:::s ~or Circuit Design,
r• ...... i '-~:I .i
"'"''. 1 ...... ~.~"':-':V)t'l', ...:~--.. .... :~l:..V~L:· .. .L 7
Elcctro-Tectillolcgy, vol. 77 no. 6, Jcnc, p. 54-57.
c.o. D:;i::tz a i'-:oC.cl J-ob, 2lectronics, ~o. 2, Jnnucry 23, ?· 82-87.
Pz.rt 5: vol. 40
Elect::c .. :'.!lc Ci::cuit li!!.:!l}?Si.s ?:-c:;r.:::·=-~ (2Ci,:..1?) {'\· ~~l"'JQ-17',-?_n~.''.?) 'uT,•!"'.· . ...,.v- ~·..-,·----u-···l r .... , J... ..,.... .. , - '""'- ./6-J.-J v........ v~"""' ::.> ...... ._..... '"'"""', t.\:.:.1.1. L...J J! .ta:tnz,
I~J "'Y., In-:2~".t1~tic·ncl Dusi:r!eGs l{~~:1.i-ries
Cm .. ')J. , 1%.5.
"). _... ¥:"1 •. i"J. • ...).
Ci::ct::lt !:.::~1.:;/s~~~ :.)~ogr.::::t Tcc:c"<_:liqucs t-..-pplic~:~ic:1s? E::glc~;ovd Cl::..f:2s, Nev.// Prcuticc-li~ll, IA-'"lc., Pot lOS-154.
~· .. ~c.
Jc::cey,
·_.,,-_ . .-,·.r.--::r.., Jo7-.-."' r:. (~r.':;·.~:"' -;-,._ ... ,_ a1 -,._· .... ,,,,~ o·:: T•··'~'"'<:>""o'"''"' ..._ ,v___ ·-J. - -·,i._Jiu, .....,,_.,. ... ~~--- .. _.._.,_.._.._...~ - 4"--L ... w-.::J"- _...,
·~ ·-_~ ... ., .... 7 .... -,- .,.. .!..,~\\, -~.;..,,
~:1d ~icd.t.:-!s, P::occcd:L::~; vf the I::\.E, ~--ol.
no. 6~ June, p.ll4l-ll52.
Juh.n. G. (1953) :·:~d2ls o= •:tr:l: .. sistors ~::d Dioclc~, :~(:W Yo::::, l·1cG:r ... ~:.J-~~ill, Inc.
L .. \-312.9, La<:; l~l~rr.~s S(:i(;~1tific L~b·orato~-y,
7C90/94 V~~G~oa, A~~~st.
43
44
[12] Revised SCEPTRE User's i:L:.~--.u.:1l: Vol, 1, (AFWL-T~-67-124),
Kirtland ~ir Fore~ B~sc, X0~ ~exico, Intcr~~tio~~l
I Business r.:c.:.ch:r..::s Corp. , April 1962.
[13] SCHEERER, W.G. (1968) Sclectin:~ Device Hodcls for Co:::~.mter~idcd Design, Elc~tro-Tcchnology, vol. 81, no. 55, May, p. 43-48
45
APPENDIX II
/J/:l~LYSIS, CALCU'..:..ATION Al\fv SELECTION
OF PAIWfE'!'ER FOR TtJ1"NEL DIODE HODELS
46
All of t~~ ~odcls have several elements, lar3c rcsist~ncc
103 oh~::.s, end z:r,;:ll : . .-~s::.stancc C. 001 ohr.1, which are used ;.iS
cur::-2nt sensing clerr:.:.:nts and ar-e the sam;; for ::ny tu:1ncl ciioC:c
series inductance, series resistance and tcr~inal capacitance
resp~ctively. The value for these cl;;rncnts can be obtained fro~
t:i:e r::.:mufacturer' s data sheet. See TABLE II-1. Figure Il-l
::.~ . .Jws rel.:ltionship of parameters in TABLE I to current-vel ::age
curve.
TAB:..E II-1
DATA FROM G.E. DATA SHEET
Vall~y Poi~t Voltage
7ermin2l Capacitance
l\ega-::i v.: Terminal Co:J.ductanc.:
Ip
Iv
vP
Vv
Vr
Vfp
Ls
Rs
•G
TD-19
10.00 rna
.95 rna
65 mv ·
355 nw
20 mv
510 U'.V
0.8 nh
0.36 ohms
27 pf
85xlo-3 mho
TTJ-l3
.095 :aa
65 I:\V
355 -::.v
20 mv
510 -..:.v
O.S n!"l
l. 7 oh::-.s
3.5 p:.::
S.Sxl0-3 r.1r.o
I
Ip
lvl ~--~-------------------~--=========~----------~~----VOLTAGE (millivolts)
47
Figure II-1 Tunnel Diode Current-Voltage Characteristic
Hodel 1 shown in Figure II-2 is a three section piecewise-
linear model. The elements simulate the three straight lines
depending on the terminal voltage. Sl turns the diode off when the
diode is back bias. When the voltage is between 0 and peak voltage
the model consists of Ls, Rs in series with G1 and c1 in parallel.
~fuen looking at the current-voltage characteristic this beco~es the
slo?e as~ociatcd with the line from (0,0) to (VPIP). l.Jhen peak
voltage level is reached, switch S2 is activated and turns on a
depe~dent current in R3. The current source has a -GM1 and is
puting current into the model thereby reducing the diode current
with increasing voltage. This is the negative resistance line
and it consists of the sum of G1 line and the -GM1 line to give the
desired negative resistance to the ~~del. When valley voltage level
Ls 10E7,R5
O,GHd. f )
I ~
G1,G~
I
I
I
o,v2 -=..
," 7
( t )
--- .... ----------- ----..,.---- --I
I
I
,
R3
- -' \
0,-GHJ
10E8 I ) LH SJ " ;
R4 , ,
I
I >10E8 :' 0.001 > r ~ I
' ' Rs ' I
' ...... .l - - .- __ I S2
cl
vl-=- - v2
Figu1T II-2 Nodd 1 ,p.. OJ
49
is reached, S3 switches G1 to G2, turns on a controlled current
source GM1 controlled by R2 to cancel the -GM. S3 also turns on I1
to control the current level at Vv the point where the third
section starts. For decreasing voltage the diode retraces the same
path.
Model 1 shown in Figure II-2 has elements Ls, G1, Gz, Vl,
Vz, GM1, I1, and C1 which must be specified from data of the
particular tunnel diode.
Selecting values for these elements depend on how the current-
voltage characteristic is to be approximated. Figure II-3 shows
the tunnel diode current-voltage characteristic and three ways to
select and approximation to the curves. Of the three shown, they
all have about the same amount of error when compared with the
actual model curve. The first curve using the (VP,IP) and (Vv,Iv)
points was selected in this paper. Using this curve as the approxi-
mation v1 and v2 are VP and Vv respectively.
,.... (/) I <l) f.< Ip <l)
fr I ~ til ~'~ ~
,,, ....... ',_, .-I •.-4 '\. ',' s - '' I ~ I z I !:<J c:G I ' ' c:G
~ ' :;::l I u I I -----1
lvf -- -2 -3
v v p v
v
VOLTAGE (millivolts)
Figure II-3 Three Section Piecewise-Linear Current-Voltage Curve
50
vl - v p
v2 • Vv
Gl, G2, GM1 and I1 are obtained from the following relationships:
VvGl-Iv G!11 •
Vv - Vp
Il • Iv
Gl • Ip
v p
G2 .. If - IV
vt - vv
For If • Ip:
I - Iv G2 • p
v f- Vv
The specific values for Model 1 representing TD-19 and TD-13
are shown in TABLE II-2.
TABLE II-2
MODEL 1 PARA.'1ETER VALUES
Par.:i::leter TD-19 TD-13
vl 0.065 0.065 volts
v2 0.355 0.355 volts
Gl 0.154 0.0154 ~.ho
G2 0.058 0.0058 mho
GM1 0.185 0.0185
Il 0.00095 0.000095 amp
51
Model 2 shown in Figure II-4 is a five section piecewise
linear model. When the voltage is between 0 and the diode peak
voltage, G1 element provides the first line from 0 to v1 • At v1
the switch S2 turns on. It changes G1 to an open circuit and
turns on an independent current source -11 which draws current
from the device and maintains the current level constant at I1
from V1 to V2, At V2 switch S3 turns on a controlled current
source -GM1 which is controlled by R4. This source removes
sufficient current to generate the negative resistance portion
of the curve from v2 to v3• At V3 switch S4 turns on a controlled
current source GM1 which is controlled by R3 and cancel the effect
of the -GM1 of switch S3. S4 also turns on an independent current
source I2 which supplies current to the device to maintain the
current level constant at 12 from V3 to V4. At V4 switch S5
turns on and G2 is then in the circuit and is the element which
generates the line from V4 to Vfp• For decreasing voltage the
diode retraces the same path.
Sl turns the diode on if the diode is forward bias and off
if the dJode is reverse bias.
The elements simulate the five straight lines depending on
the terminal voltage.
Model 2 shown in Figure II-4 has elements Ls, Cl, Gl, G2, VI,
v2, V3, V4, GMI, 11, and 12 which must be specified from data of
the particular device.
The selection of values for these elements depend on the
S! .. I ~
· 10E7, Rs
A
c
,.-• S2
., -""t ~ '\. ( I I
I
~
Gl, lE-8
R2 lOEB
vl-=-
0,-Il
"' -- -- -- ---..L-
" / ,/
J:f • '>..
~E8 > ~
\
\ . y- - - \
531--' CD ·~R6 0,-GM1 lOEB
(_ I Rs
.001
v2 V3-
Figure II-4 Hodel 2
........
' \
\
\ I + I
VI ~
53
current-voltage characteristic shown in Figure II-5.
This curve is a better approximation to the actual device then
the Model 1 curve. The voltage ratios selected are dependent on
the shape of the current-voltage characteristic and for tunnel
diodes with a curve proportioned differently, the voltage would
be different.
-tl) Q)
'"' Q)
~ Ill ~ ,.-j ,.-j
~
s -E-1 z ~ ~ ~ :;J (J
I
Ip
Iv ' ..... -.-::-=------=
v3
VOLTAGE (millivolts)
Figure II-5 Five Section Piecewise-Linear Current-Voltage Curve
The yoltage V1, V2, V3 and V4 are the following:
v1 - .95Vp
V2 • 1.05Vp
VJ • .70Vv
V4 • 1.15Vv
54
Gl, Gz' GM, 11 and Iz are obtained from the following relationship:
GM1 • Ip - Iv
v3 - vP
ll - Ip
12 - Ip - I v
Gl • Ip
vl
Gz -If - IV
Vf - v4
For If • Ip:
Gz • IP - Iv
vf - v4
The specific values for Model 2 representing TD-19 and TD-13
are shown in TABLE II-3.
Model 3 shown in Figure II-6 is a smooth curve model. The
elements simulate the model so there are no sharp corners. The
curve, like the other models, is made up of pieces. The elements
Ls in series Rs in parallel with G1 and Cl provide the waveform
from 0 to Vp• At Vp, Sl turns on a controlled current source -BETA
which is controlled by Gz. Sl also closes the open resistor R6 to
allow the capacitor C2 to change up and supply current to Gz. This
develops the negative resistance portion of the curve by sub
tracting BETA times the G2 current from the initial waveform,
which continues from Vp to Vv• At Vv the switch S2 turns on and
opens resistor R7. This removes the voltage source from Cz it
55
discharges, increasing current in G1 and generating the portion of
the curve that goes from Vv up. At the same time S4 and S5 have
turned on setting up the circuitry, R9 , R10 , R11 and 0.875 voltage
generator, for decreasing voltage. S4 shorts R9 and S5 shorts Rlo•
When the voltage starts down capacitor C3 (also S3) senses the
change and R11 is reduced to 10 ohms. Cz is charged up causing
the current in G1 to decrease and generate the curve down to Vv·
At that time S4 turns off, opening R9 causing c2 to discharge
through G2 increasing diode current. After Cz is completely
discharged, the voltage continues to decrease and the current and
voltage decreases back to 0.
Model 3 shown in Figure II-6 like the previous models has
elements v1 , v2 , v3 , v4 , Ls, Rs, c1, G1 , G2 , and BETA which need
to be specified for each particular device.
Parameter
vl
Vz
VJ
v4
Gl
Gz
GMl
Il
12
TABLE II-3
MODEL 2 PARAMETER VALUES
TD-19 TD-13
0.0618 0.0618
0.0682 0.0682
0.249 0.249
0.408 0.408
0.161 0.0161
0.0887 0.000887
0.0492 o:oo492
0.01 0.001
0.00905 0.000905
volts
volts
volts
volts
mho
mho
amp
amp
A
c
~
I I I
o~ 1 1
-BETA~~
~
Gl
v2 ,o
.. - -- - - -- ---:,- -- -~---- -' '
;------- --,---------------
,_-\
' -~
' j!
Sl R2 I lOE8-c1
v1 ,o _
ss
V2..=_
' \ ....
' '--\...---' ---- I \
-~
·~-1 S4 I
\.
R4 10E8
Rs 0 01 t1
lOEB ., ~
\ \ \ .. I
R3 10E8
--, j_ \ I
I
~O,V.s...=.. I
v4,o-=- I
I
S31- ..L
I
I I I
'
C3 2E-12
I I I
Rs
.......
~
'
) l ! ! ~ ~ J I
Figure II-6 Model 3
-------,
' '
'
-=-.875
\
\
\
\ I
\ I
\
c2 ' .OSE'f
-6 G2
\..n 0\
-Cl)
G) .... CIJ
~ Ill
o.-4 ...... ...... o.-4 a ........
~ p:; p:; ::;:, u
I
Ip
Iv
Vz VOLTAGE {millivolts)
I /
I I
I I
I
I I
Figure II-7 Model 3 Current-Volta~e Characteristic
v3 - .95Vp
v4 • 1.15Vv
57
a2 and BETAare interrelated in this model by the following
equation: Iv .11-expafC--l • BETA [1-exp-{t*;~P)J vl L Rl J ~2.-
where:
Iv • valley current
v1 • Charging Voltage • 1.5 volts
Rl • Rs +-1-
C • O.OSE-~2
tp • R C ln [Rlip vl
The unknown quantities are:
BETA
• Time to Reach Peak Point
tv • Time to Reach Valley Point
58
tv is approximately a constant for a range of BETA's and G2's,
therefore, to obtain an acceptable tv set BETA•l and G2 • 2Gl
and run ECAP for the current-voltage. tv is the time that
52 turned on. Then by picking values of BETA and solving
for G2 all the parameters for the model will be selected for
Model 3 representing TD-19 are shown in TABLE II-4.
TABLE II-4
MODEL 3 PARA.'ffiTER VALUES
Parameter TD-19
vl 0.065 volts
v2 0.355 volts
V3 0.0618 volts
v4 0.408 volts
v5 0.510 volts
Gl 0.154 tr.hos
G2 0.308 mhos
BETA -0.8
59
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ARRONS, M.W. and GOLDBERG, M.J. (1965) Computer Methods for Integrated Circuit Design, Electro Technology, May, vol. 75 no. 2, p. 77-81.
CALAHAN, D.H. (1968) Computer-Aided Network Design, New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc., p. 245-273.
CHRISTIANSEN, D. (1966) Computer-Aided Design Part 1: The ManMachine Merger, Electronics, vol. 39 no.l9, September 19, p. 110-123
DANIEL, M.E. (1967) Development of Mathematical Models of Semiconductor Devices for Computer-Aided Circuit Design, Proceeding of IEEE, vol. 55 no. 11, November, p. 1913-1920.
DAWSON, D.F. (1968) Computer-Aided Circuit Analysis by the Topological Approach, Electro-Technology, vol. 82 no. 5, November, p. 43-44.
Digital Computer Program for Transient Analysis of Electronics Circuit (CIRCUS) (346-1), User's Guide, Seattle, Washington, Boeing Company, 1967, p. 90.
EBERS, J. J. and MOLL, J. L. (1954) Large-Signal Behavior of Junction Transistors, Proceedings of the IRE, vol. 42 no. 12, December, p. 1761-1772.
FALK, H. (1964) Computer Programs for Circuit Design, ElectroTechnology, vol. 73 no. 3, March, p. 101-103, 162, 164.
FALK, H. (1966) Computer Programs for Circuit Design, ElectroTechnology, vol. 77 no. 6, June. p. 54-57.
G.E. Transistor Mnnual, Seventh Edition, General Electric Company, 1964.
GENTILE, S.P. (1962) Basic Theory and Application of Tunnel Diodes, D. Van Nostrand Company, Princeton, New Jersey, p. 295.
GOLDBERG, N.J. and ARHARD, J.W. (1967) Computer-Aided Design: Part 7 Pergorming Non-Linear DC Analysis, Electronics, vol. 40 no. 5, March 6, p. 140-147.
GUMMEL, H.K. (1968) A Charge-Control Transistor Model for Network Analysis Programs, Proceeding of IEEE, vol. 56 no. 4, April, p. 75.
60
HALL, R.N. (1960) Tunnel Diodes, IRE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ed. 7 no. 1, January, p. 1-9.
HAMILTON, D.J., LINDHOLM, F.A. and NARUD, J.A., (1964) Comparison of Large Signal Models for Junction Transistors, Proceedings of IEEE, vol. 52 no. 3, March, p. 239-248.
HARBOURT, C.O. (1967) Computer-Aided Design: Part 5 Doing a Model Job, Electronics, vol. 40 no. 2, January 23, p.82-87.
HINES, M.E. (1967) High Frequency Negative-Resistance Circuit Principles for Eaaki Diode Applications, The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. XLVI no. 3, March, p. 523•576.
JENSEN, R.W. (1966) Charge Control Transistor Model for IBM ECAP, IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory, vol. CT-13 no. 4, December, p. 428-437.
JENSEN, R.W. (1967) A Network-Analysis Approach Simplifies the Problem, Electro-Technology, vol. 80 no. 5, November, p. 42-48.
JENSEN, R.W., and LIEBE&~, M.D. (1968) IBM Electronic Circuit Analysis Program Techniques and Applications, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc., p. 106-154.
KUO, F.F. (1966) Network Analysis by Digital Computer, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 54 no. 6, June, p. 820-829.
LINVILL, John G. (1958) Lumped Models of Transistors and Diodes, Proceedings of the IRE, vol. 46 no. 6, June, p. 1141-1152.
LINVILL, John G. (1963) Models of Transistors and Diodes, New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc., p. 190.
MAGNUSON, J.R. (1967) Computer-Aided Design: Part 8 Picking Transient Analysis Programs, Electronics, vol. 40 no. 8, Apr~l 17, p. 84-87.
MALMBERG, A.F., CORNWELL, F.L. and HOFER, F.W. (1964) NET-1 Network Analysis Program. (709/94) Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Report, September.
MOLL, J.L. (1954) Large Signal Response of Junction Transistors, Proceedings of the IRE, vol. 42 no. 12, December, p. 1773-1763.
RIPS, E.M. (1967) Calculating Amplifier Poles and Zeros with Digital Computer, EEE, vol. 15 no. 2, February, p. 94-100.
61
ROBERTS, B.D. and HARBOURT, C.O. (1967) Computer Models of the Field-Effect Transistor, Proceedings of IEEE, vol. 55 no. 11, November, p. 1921-1929.
Revised SCEPTRE user's Manual: Vol. 1. (AFWL-TR-67-124), Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, International Business Machine Corp., April 1968.
SCHEERER, W.G. (1968) Selecting Device Models for Computer-Aided Design, Electro-Technology, vol. 81, no. 55, May, p. 43-48.
SOKAL, N.O., SIERAKOWSKI, J.J. and SIROTA, J.J. (1967) Part 1: Use a Good Switching Transistor Model, Electronic Design, vol. 15 no. 12, June 7, p. 54-59.
SOKAL, N.O., SIERAKOWSKI, J.J., and SIROTA, J.J. (1967) Part 3: Diode Model is analyzed by Computer, Electronic Design, vol. 15 no. 14, July, p.80-85.
SOMMERS, H.S. Jr. (1959) Tunnel Diodes as High Frequency Devices, Proceeding of the IRE, vol. 47 no. 7, July, p. 1201-1206.
SPENCER, William (1969) Try this linear FET Model with ECAP, Electronic Design, vol. 17 no. 8, April, P. 82-85.
SYLVAN, T.P. (1965) The Unijunction Transistor Characteristics, Application Note 90.10, General Electric, May, p. 95.
WALL, H. (1966) Circuit Analysis by Computer, Electro-Technology, vol. 78 no. 5, November, p. 50-56.
62
VJ..TA
The author, Carmon Dale Thiems, was born January 14, 1938,
in Highland, Illinois. He received his primary and secondary
education in Highland, Illinois. He received his college education
from the University of Illinois in Urbana, Illinois. He re-
ceived a Bachelor of Science Degree in Electrical Engineering
from the University of Illinois in June. 1964.
He has been enrolled in the Graduate School of the University
of Missouri - St. Louis since September of 1965.