Tuesday, July 16, 2019 - Jacksonville Beach, Florida · Tuesday, July 16, 2019 Public Hearing: ......
Transcript of Tuesday, July 16, 2019 - Jacksonville Beach, Florida · Tuesday, July 16, 2019 Public Hearing: ......
Board of Adjustment Meeting Tuesday, July 16, 2019
Minutes of Board of Adjustment Meeting held Tuesday, July 16, 2019, at 7:00 P.M., in the Council Chambers, 11 North 3rd Street, Jacksonville Beach, Florida
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Jeff Truhlar called the meeting to order.
ROLL CALL
Chairperson: Jeff Truhlar Vice-Chairperson: Francis Reddington Board Members: Scott Cummings Sylvia Osewalt (absent)
Alternates: Dan Janson
Building Official George Knight was also present.
EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION: None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The following minutes were unanimously approved:
• June 18, 2019
CORRESPONDENCE: None
NEW BUSINESS:
(A) Case Number: BOA 19-100091 Applicant/Owner: Virginia and Graydon Mabry Property Address: 3015 Ocean Drive South
JACKSONVILLE BEACH
John Moreland
Legal Description: Lot 3, Block 1, Atlantic Shores Ocean Front Section-Division B
City of Jacksonville Beach Land Development Code Section(s) 34-336(e)(1 )c.2, for side yard setbacks of 7 feet in lieu of l O feet required, and 34-336(e){l)e, for lot coverage of 49% in lieu of 35% maximum to allow for construction of a new single-family dwelling.
Agent: Mark Macco, 3535 1st Street South, Jacksonville Beach, would be representing the applicant of this case. He stated the lot is nonconforming, and he is requesting for a 7-foot setback on each side. He added this is the case with the property's neighboring homes in the Atlantic Shores
B0Al 907l6 mins
Board of Adjustment Meeting Tuesday, July 16, 20 19
subdivision. He is constructing a contemporary home that would complement other properties in the
neighborhood. The property would have nine parking spaces, including the garage spaces.
Public Hearing: The following spoke in favor of the variance application:
• Robert Grovenstein, 3007 Ocean Drive South, Jacksonville Beach
Mr. Truhlar closed the public hearing.
Discussion: Mr. Moreland commented this is clearly a substandard lot when considering lot size and building
lines. Mr. Cummings commented the side yard setback request is adequate for City standar9s.
Motion: It was moved by Mr. Moreland, seconded by Mr. Cummings, to approve
BOA# 19-100091, as written and discussed
Roll Call Vote: Ayes - Scott Cummings, John Moreland, Dan Janson, and JeffTruhlar
Nays - Francis Reddington
The motion was approved by a vote of 4-1 .
(B) Case Number: BOA 19-100093 Applicant/Owner: Sean Shapiro
Property Address: 1745 Pullian Street
Legal Description: Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Williams Coastal Boulevard Heights SID
City of Jacksonville Beach Land Development Code Section(s) 34-337(e)(l)e, for lot coverage
of 43 .6% in lieu of 35% maximum and 34-337(e)(l)g, for an accessory structure (walkway) setback
of 3 feet in lieu of 5 feet required to allow for a pool with paver patio and walkway addition to an
existing single-family dwelling.
Applicant: Sean Shapiro, 1745 Pullian Street, Jacksonville Beach, stated he has a nonconforming
50-foot-wide lot. Mr. Truhlar asked if the paver sidewalk on the survey is already-existing; Mr.
Sharpio replied it is not. Mr. Sharpio stated he originally applied for 45% lot coverage after he applied exact math and added the 43 .6% in the variance was a draft calculation. He did not take into
account the pad for the equipment would be the buffer percentage reaching 45% lot coverage. The
Board commented it could not raise a lot coverage request. Discussion ensued, and the applicant was advised he could withdraw the application if he wanted. The applicant stated he would move
forward with the 43.6% lot coverage request.
Mr. Sharpio stated he is asking for minimal pavers around the pool. A spa would be built into the
pool area. His initial intention was to add another pad at the northeast comer of the existing house
BOA190716 mins 2
Board of Adjustment Meeting Tuesday, July 16, 20 19
for the placement of equipment. The accessory structure is the paved walkway. There is a 10-foot distance between the porch and the pool, and in the backside area of the pool as well. The walkway on the northside of the lot is a 4-foot area that allows pool access. Mr. Shaprio commented he has spoken to his neighbors, and they support the project.
Public Hearing: None one came forward to speak regarding this case. Mr. Truhlar closed the public hearing.
Discussion: The lot in discussion is 7,625 feet square. Mr. Cummings stated he is concerned about the placement of pavers. Mr. Moreland commented his issue is the building width is undersized, but the lot coverage is not. Board agreed this is a reasonable request.
Motion:
Roll Call Vote:
It was moved by Mr. Moreland, seconded by Mr. Cummings, to approve BOA# 19-100093 as presented and discussed.
Ayes- John Moreland, Francis Reddington, Scott Cummings, Dan Janson, and Jeff Truhlar
The motion was approved unanimously.
(C) Case Number: BOA 19-100094 Applicant/Owner: Dannean Hetzel Property Address: 3963 America Avenue Legal Description: Lot 17, together with the west Yi closed alley east of and adjacent thereto,
Block 16, Ocean Terrace
City of Jacksonville Beach Land Development Code Section(s) 34-336(e)(l )e, for lot coverage of 49% in lieu of 35% maximum to allow for the addition of a pool and paver patio to an existing single-family dwelling.
Agent: Bob Hamil, 725 McCollum Circle, Neptune Beach, and owner Dannean Hetzel, 3963 America A venue, Jacksonville Beach, both approached the Board to discuss this case. Mr. Hamil stated the lot is undersized. It is 7,000 square feet, and the minimum required by RS-1 zone law is 10,000 square feet. Mr. Hamil pointed to the presentation [ on file] to explain where he is planning on adding the pool and paver patio. The pavers would be comprised of 382 square feet, and the equipment pad would be 3x5 square feet. There is eight-feet between the pool and the pavers. Ms. Hetzel has spoken with her neighbors, and they are fully approving of the variance.
Public Hearing: No one came before the Board to speak regarding this case.
BOAl907 16 mins 3
Board of Adjustment Meeting Tuesday, July 16, 20 19
Mr. Truhlar closed the public hearing.
Discussion: Mr. Moreland comm_ented if this were a standard lot, its coverage would be 33_. 25%. Mr. Reddington commented he has an issue granting 49% lot coverage.
Motion:
Roll Call Vote:
It was moved by Mr. Moreland, seconded by Mr. Janson, to approve BOA# 19-100094, as written and discussed.
Ayes- Francis Reddington, Scott Cummings, John Moreland, Dan Janson, and Jeff Truhlar
The motion was approved unanimously.
(D) Case Number: BOA 19-100096 and BOA 19-100097 Applicant: Owner: Property Address: Legal Description:
MaliVai Washington Diamond Life Real Estate, Inc. (MaliVai Washington) 629 4th A venue South
Lot 8, Block 37, Pablo Beach South
City of Jacksonville Beach Land Development Code Section(s) 34-339(e)(l )f, fo r 36% lot coverage in lieu of35% maximum to allow for construction of a new two-family dwelling.
Agent: MaliVai Washington, 554 Jacksonville Drive, Jacksonville Beach, stated the plan for this lot allowed for a one-parcel duplex. He noticed while he was completing a preliminary review of the initial plan for construction of two townhomes, the driveways were not five feet from the center line as required by code. In finding a solution for the issue, he has decided to shift the construction off the property line to avoid the request for setbacks, but this has consequently caused an increase in lot coverage by 1 %.
The plan shows a one-car garage. Each driveway is five feet from the property line. Mr. Washington spoke to the neighbors to the immediate west, and the other two lots to the east, and he has not received any negative comments. The owners originally wanted to build a single-family home, but it was not feasible, so they decided to build townhomes to conform closely to the neighborhood. When asked if the lot to the east needed this same variance, Mr. Washington stated it does, but it was not mentioned in the variance application by accident.
The driveway depth is 19 feet. Mr. Cummings questioned the agent about the compacted gravel walk. Mr. Washington responded he is planning on constructing a concrete driveway, with compacted gravel in the middle. The compacted gravel would also be used for a walkway to the entrance of the townhome.
BOA 1907 16 mins 4
Board of Adjustment Meeting Tuesday, July 16, 20 19
Public Hearing: The following spoke regarding the variance application:
• Deidre Dryer, 636 3rd Avenue South, Jacksonville Beach
Mr. Truhlar closed the public hearing.
Discussion: Mr. Reddington stated with reservations, he has no problem granting this lot coverage. The Board
agreed.
Motion: It was moved by Mr. Cummings, seconded by Mr. Reddington, to approve BOA 19-100096 and BOA 19-100097, as written and described.
Roll Call Vote: Ayes- Francis Reddington, . Scott Cummings, John Moreland, Dan Janson, and Jeff Truhlar
The motion was approved unanimously.
(E) Case Number: BOA 19-100100 Applicant: Julie Marco Owner: Mad Dog Land Holdings, LLC Agent: Craig Sommers Property Address: 1181 10th Street South Legal Description: Lots 7 and 8, lock 120, Oceanside Park
City of Jacksonville Beach Land Development Code Section(s) 34-377, for 5 parking spaces in lieu of 17 parking spaces required to allow for the conversion of a warehouse building into a dog boarding and training faci lity with a covered training area.
Ex-Parte Disclosure: Mr. Janson announced he personally knows agent Craig Summers. They did not have any conversation.
Agent: Craig Summers, 3 70 15111 A venue South, Jacksonville Beach, and applicant Julie Marco, 2399 Ocean Breeze Court, Atlantic Beach, approached the Board to discuss the case. Mr. Truhlar first requested some information regarding I-1 zoning laws. Mr. Knight explained:
The dog grooming facility is an allowed use for this zone. There is no minimum lot area or width. The minimum yard setback in the front is 10 feet. The minimum side yard setback is 5 feet, except for a comer lot. In regard to a comer lot, the side yard facing the setback should be 10 feet. There is no rear yard setback minimum. The maximum lot coverage allowed is 85%.
BOA 190716 mins 5
Board of Adjustment Meeting Tuesday, July 16, 20 19
Parking setback requirements are dependent on the conditioned space and listed in this variance
application.
In explaining his hardship, Mr. Summers stated this business serves dogs and not people, and he is
asking for a reduction in parking spaces. The boarding and training facility in the discussion would
not have office space, and there would be no modifications to the building, and no impervious
surfaces would be added. The conditioned parking spaces would be used as a training area. Clients
often visit their dogs one to two times for one hour for a duration of two weeks. Ms. Marco
compared the service of the facility to dry cleaners, where dogs are dropped off and picked up.
Clients do not stay for a prolonged period. Mr. Reddington commented there is no hardship.
Mr. Truhlar commented the variance, if granted, would remain with the property; therefore, any
decision cannot be based on the business, but the land itself. Mr. Knight clarified only a change in
use or occupancy would go back to the original requirements, like if it were to become a restaurant.
Mr. Moreland questioned ifthere is a hardship created by the property. Discussion ensued regarding
off-street parking and the City' s reconstruction plans. Mr. Summers commented the applicant would
be linking the two lots into one continuous parcel. Ms. Marco commented there are at least four staff
members per shift, working twice per day. There would also be at least two staff members per shift
in the new training facility.
Public Hearing: The following spoke in favor of the variance application:
• Fabio Fasanelli, 121 Strong Branch Drive, Ponte Vedra Beach, the general contractor for the
project, explained the reasoning behind the parking space reduction. There are approximately seven currently-existing parking spaces behind the building.
Mr. Moreland commented there is no land hardship present. Mr. Summers stated the hardship is in
the code being rigid. Ms. Marco commented there would be approximately 20-30 dogs per month
in the new building, with 32 kennel spaces overall. The existing building is 3,300 square feet.
Mr. Truhlar closed the public hearing.
Discussion: The Board agreed no hardship is present. Mr. Knight commented this property is listed as "Commercial Use - not specifically listed" and carries a parking requirement of one space per 200 square feet.
Motion:
BOAl907 16 mins
It was moved by Mr. Reddington, seconded by Mr. Cummings, to reject
BOA# 19-100100, as written and discussed, based on the fact a hardship has not been met.
6
Board of Adjustment Meeting Tuesday, July 16, 20 19
Roll Call Vote: Ayes- Scott Cummings, John Moreland, Francis Reddington, and Jeff
Truhlar Nays- Dan Janson
The motion to reject was approved by a vote of 4-1.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT
The next scheduled meeting is Tuesday, August 6, 2019. There are six (6) scheduled case.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business coming before the Board, Mr. Truhlar adjourned the meeting at 8:00 P.M.
Submitted by: Sama Kaseer
Administrative Assistant
BOAl9071 6 mins
Approval:
Date
7