TT_AviationBrochure_2015

55
Aviation Market Sector Overview

Transcript of TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Page 1: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Aviation Market Sector Overview

Page 2: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Table of Contents

Firm Overview 1 - Firm Profile - Aviation Design - Office Locations

Practice Areas 2

- Structural Engineering - Renewal / Forensics - Sustainability - Façade Engineering - Construction Engineering - Property Loss Consulting

Added Value Services 3

- Building Information Modeling - Integrated Modeling Services

Representative Airport Terminal Experience 4 Representative Hangar Experience 5 Representative Airport Support Facility Experience 6

Page 3: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Who is Thornton Tomasetti?

We bring the whole team: Our integrated practices offer a range of services that yield benefits greater than the sum of their parts.

Collaboration drives value: We are committed to proactive collaboration, communication and to making the complex understandable.

Thornton Tomasetti provided structural engineering for the O’Hare International Airport, United Airlines, Terminal 1 in Chicago, IL.

Thornton Tomasetti provides engineering design, investigation, consulting and analysis services to clients worldwide on projects of every size and complexity. Our integrated practices can address the full life cycle of a structure. Founded in 1956, today Thornton Tomasetti is an 800-person organization of engineers, architects and other professionals collaborating from offices across the United States and in Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East.

Structural Engineering: We collaborate with architects, owners and builders to design elegant solutions for challenging projects of all types – from the tallest buildings and longest spans to inventive structures and expansion projects. We focus on achieving the optimal balance among the demands of form, function, constructability, sustainability, schedule and budget.

Construction Engineering: We offer advanced project delivery services to provide owners and contractors with complete and detailed information to improve the project schedule. We create customized project delivery strategies including integrated modeling, connection design, erection engineering and full-time field representation, to meet the specific needs of each project and client.

Façade Engineering: Our team applies expertise in systems and materials to integrate façade design and structural design in new buildings, renovations and recladding projects. We help solve complex design challenges, improve constructability, maximize efficiency and increase security. Our skill in 3D parametric and building information modeling allows us to work directly with manufacturers to design, engineer and install these systems.

Sustainability: We partner with clients to integrate green solutions into the design, construction and operation of buildings, reducing their impact on the environment throughout the building life cycle. We use whole-systems thinking and analytic tools to develop solutions that balance design, economic, social and environmental factors. We provide sustainable design strategies, energy analysis, green building certification consulting, and education and training.

Renewal: Our experts provide building owners and managers with a wide range of envelope, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection services. We conduct performance investigations, condition assessments, prepurchase due diligence surveys, feasibility studies and peer reviews. We design repairs, renovations and alterations and oversee their execution.

Forensics: We assist attorneys, property managers, building owners, contractors and designers with a wide range of forensic services. As designers, we evaluate for standard of care; as forensic specialists, we seek root cause; as problem solvers, we seek resolution. We provide reports, expert testimony, calculations / drawings and computer models and simulations.

Property Loss Consulting: Our specialists work with insurance companies to analyze risks and claims arising from natural or man-made perils. Our experienced multidisciplinary staff of structural engineers, architects and mechanical, electrical and plumbing engineers provides investigation, cause and origin analysis, assessment for reoccupancy of damaged buildings, building code upgrade analysis and specialized claim response. We also provide expert reports and testimony based on our investigations.

Page 4: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Aviation Design

Carrasco International Airport Roof Montevideo, URY

Photo courtesy of MediaWright Photography Indianapolis International Airport, Col. H. Weir Cook Terminal Indianapolis, IN

Hamad International Airport, Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Facility Doha, QAT

Thornton Tomasetti has built a stellar reputation across the nation for devising innovative, cost-effective solutions to the most rigorous structural challenges of aviation design. We work closely with world-class architects to provide the structural systems, forms and quality necessary to achieve an envisioned building’s concept and geometry. Backed by the latest computer techniques and structural analysis programs, Thornton Tomasetti excels in optimizing structural system design to reduce structural weight and simplify construction procedures. We are known for our ability to be structurally innovative in the interest of expressed project goals, including construction economy, avoidance of site construction problems, realization of architectural function and form, and desired owner image. Our experience in executing complex structural systems for long-span aviation facilities includes: Air-supported, tensile structures Space frames Space trusses Stressed-skin systems Long-span trusses Long-span joist systems Arches Laminated long-span wood systems Cable-suspended systems Hybrids We provide the full spectrum of engineering services for airport terminals, hangars, parking structures and cargo facilities. Our services include feasibility studies, design, peer review, construction administration, computer analysis, wind analysis, seismic design, value engineering and quality control, failure investigation, building-envelope investigation and analysis, blast mitigation, rehabilitation recommendation and design, and retrofits and renovations.

Page 5: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Office Locations

www.ThorntonTomasetti.com

New York, NY 917.661.7800 Abu Dhabi, UAE +971.2.491.3373 Beijing, China 86.21.8530.6262 Boston, MA 617.273.8313 Chicago, IL 312.596.2000 Christchurch, New Zealand +64.3.341.3115 Dallas, TX 972.387.8393 Denver, CO 303.876.5700 Dubai, UAE +971.4.453.2680

Thornton Tomasetti maintains offices in the United States, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Europe and the Middle East and has worked on projects of all scales and complexities in more than 50 countries. We cultivate a highly diverse workforce, with fluency in more than two dozen languages and knowledge of the culture and business practices in a wide range of markets.

Fort Lauderdale, FL Newark, NJ 954.522.3690 973.286.6100 Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Philadelphia, PA +84.8.3520.7739 267.238.4000 Hong Kong, China Portland, ME 852.2890.4488 207.347.5066 Irvine, CA Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 949.271.3300 +966.1.293.6895 Kansas City, MO San Diego, CA 816.221.7771 619.550.5900 London, UK San Francisco, CA 44.(0).207.278.2778 415.365.6900 Los Angeles, CA São Paulo, Brazil 310.665.0010 +55 (11) 3266.7185 Moscow, Russia Shanghai, China + 7.499.745.01.00 86.21.6322.0166 Mumbai, India Washington, DC +91.22.4070.0304 202.580.6300

Page 6: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Structural Engineering

John F. Kennedy International Airport, Terminal One Jamaica, NY

Incheon International Airport, Phase III Incheon, KOR

Thornton Tomasetti’s Structural Engineering practice provides a complete range of structural design services for clients worldwide on projects of all sizes and complexity – from designing some of the world’s tallest buildings and longest spans, to engineering the most ambitious yet small-scale structures. In all our work – from new design to alteration of existing buildings, to feasibility and peer reviews of emerging designs – we continually challenge convention while striving to address the demands of constructability, sustainability, budget, function and aesthetic vision. Any successful building project requires an understanding of the interaction between structural systems, building façade and architectural and mechanical systems. Our integrated services in building structure, façade and performance uniquely position us to serve our clients with this holistic perspective. All of our structural designs are developed with Building Information Models, using custom interoperability tools that enable us to work with virtually any design software. This interoperability and use of BIM enhances efficiency, accelerates delivery time, reduces change orders and preserves the design integrity as it moves across software platforms. Our project delivery strategy is customized to meet individual client needs. For design-bid-build, design-build, integrated project delivery or a hybrid, we understand the benefits and limitations of each approach and advise our clients on the most suitable choice. We routinely incorporate advanced detailing, saving time and ensuring accuracy of deliverables for the contractor and fabricator, and erection engineering and site logistics support to optimize the construction process.

Page 7: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Renewal and Forensics

Ataturk International Airport, Seismic Upgrade Istanbul, TUR

Memphis International Airport, Seismic Risk Assessment Memphis, TN

Building failures range from the everyday to the cataclysmic: from gradual deterioration that erodes function and value, to sudden and catastrophic collapse. Our Renewal and Forensics practices cover these extremes and everything in between. Inadequate building performance can stem from the envelope’s failure to control moisture or the degradation of mechanical systems that lead to occupant discomfort. Or it can result from design shortcomings or emerging priorities such as protective design, energy efficiency and sustainability. Our multidisciplinary professionals provide technical support to building owners, managers and other stakeholders through the entire building lifecycle. We specify maintenance regimens, and assist owners with upgrades, repairs, expansions, adaptive reuses and historic preservation. We offer a full range of forensic and analytic expertise using state-of-the-art computer analysis, modeling and visualization. We provide expert opinions on structural, architectural, mechanical and building envelope issues for litigation support. We present findings clearly and concisely and develop practical, cost-effective solutions for buildings of all types, vintages, sizes and complexities. Our firm’s global reach enables us to respond rapidly to structural failures, assessing damage and helping to mitigate and stabilize hazardous conditions. We develop appropriate solutions, including temporary stabilization, and engineer deconstruction and repairs to prevent an adverse situation from becoming worse.

Page 8: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Sustainability Services

San Francisco International Airport Terminal Two Renovation – Interior San Francisco, CA

American Airlines Offices Tenant Improvement, SFO Terminal 2 San Francisco, CA

Virgin America Back of House Tenant Improvements, SFO Terminal 2 San Francisco, CA

Our sustainability specialists collaborate with clients and project partners to integrate successful green solutions into the planning, design, construction and operation of buildings to reduce their environmental impact at every stage in their life cycle. We use whole-systems thinking and cutting-edge technological tools to develop innovative solutions that balance economic, social and environmental factors. Our experienced team offers sustainable design strategies, energy analysis, building certification consulting, sustainability analysis and upgrades for existing structures, and education and training.

Sustainable Strategies: We front-load sustainability and climate change-resilient design considerations early in the programming and concept design phases to help project teams realize integrated, high-performance buildings and master plans. We use locally meaningful sustainability strategies, such as diversity of building types and transit-oriented walkable streets, and a variety of planning tools – charrettes, community meeting facilitation, green guidelines and master plan language development – to build smart communities and cities for the 21st Century.

Energy Analysis: We use a variety of software to maximize energy savings and support design decisions through computer-simulated representation of specific spaces and of the building as a whole that help test strategies for achieving operational savings. We provide this data early in the design process to help owners and designers assess how to shift investments in performance optimization for maximum impact. Building Certification: We apply our experience in the development and application of LEED to provide project management, energy modeling and documentation services for all LEED rating systems. Our international presence and experience has positioned our staff to guide successful certification for multiple international rating systems including BREEAM, Three Star, Estidama, Green Star and others. Existing Buildings: We provide support for performance-driven upgrades, helping building owners identify energy opportunities and other performance challenges and offering guidance on how to fix these problems. We can also develop operational policies and plans to help on-going operations and occupant behavior support original sustainability goals for the building. We embrace the principles of resilient design and offer resiliency assessment to protect and improve the long-term value our clients’ portfolios.

Education and Training: Thornton Tomasetti provides pre-approved and tailored education and training courses to the design and building industry. Our firm goal is to help cultivate innovation and embrace integrative design and net-zero thinking. From public workshops to higher education courses, the firm’s sustainability experts support comprehensive green building by teaching courses ranging from integrated design to a wide range of approaches in high-performance green buildings.

Page 9: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Façade Engineering

O’Hare International Airport Terminal 1 Vestibules Chicago, IL

Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC), Phase I Anaheim, CA

Our multidisciplinary team of façade engineering specialists brings decades of experience providing design, consulting, engineering and construction support to clients around the world. We integrate façade engineering and structural designs in new buildings and renovation projects, with scope and service offerings that can be tailored to accommodate the specific needs and budget of any project.

As architects push building forms into new territory, building skin designs have evolved to meet new geometric complexities. Faceted designs and thinner, more delicate enclosures are becoming the norm. These aesthetic qualities must be achieved without sacrificing performance requirements dictated by unique local conditions, sustainability objectives, demanding schedules and budget constraints.

We provide façade consulting and engineering services to architects, building owners and developers at all project stages. We offer a suite of specialty analyses, either as standalone services or as part of a broader scope, that solve complex design challenges, improve constructability, maximize energy efficiency and increase security. We also perform a range of construction support consulting services to assist contractors during bidding, negotiation, value engineering, post-contract review and site supervision.

Building skins vary as widely as an architect’s imagination, with equally diverse solutions by engineers, contractors and manufacturers. Our expertise in systems and materials ranges from traditional curtain walls to innovative custom design solutions. Our capabilities in 3D parametric and building information modeling allow us to work directly with a variety of manufacturers worldwide on design, consulting, engineering and installation of these systems.

Page 10: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Construction Engineering

Steel Modeling and Detailing

Concrete Modeling and Detailing

Erection Engineering

Full-time Field Representation

Thornton Tomasetti’s Construction Engineering practice integrates design and construction teams to effectively and efficiently move a project from concept to completion. Our understanding of both design and construction fosters team collaboration to develop a customized project approach to achieve reliable pricing and on-schedule delivery.

ADVANCED PROJECT DELIVERY

Steel Modeling and Detailing Structural Steel Connection Design Precast and Cast-in-place Concrete Modeling and Detailing

Using Tekla Structures along with a suite of interoperable custom design tools, we incorporate advanced project delivery services into the design phase. These services facilitate a collaborative environment, which provides the construction team with more complete and detailed information earlier than in conventional approaches.

Our advanced project delivery services coordinate the complete structure, using a single model to create design drawings and construction deliverables, from fabrication-ready models to shop drawings and sequencing plans. This early integration of services improves the overall project schedule by dramatically reducing change orders and provides greater cost certainty by increasing the quality of the delivered product.

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING

Erection Engineering Analysis and Planning Temporary Stability Analysis and Engineering

We evaluate project needs and restraints to find the optimal means and sequence of construction to safely and efficiently erect a structure. These efforts are most often developed in collaboration with the installing contractor to form a constructable and cost-effective solution.

FIELD ENGINEERING AND SITE REPRESENTATION

Full-time Field Representation Cast-in-place Concrete Special Inspections

We provide both on-site and off-site field engineering support for projects where Thornton Tomasetti is the engineer of record, or when clients require our broad expertise.

Page 11: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

DHD

LTS

Dulles InternationHangar Collapse Dulles, VA

Lambert - St. LouTornado DamageSt. Louis, MO

nal Airport,

uis International Ae Assessment

Airport,

Proper

Thornton Tomarchitectural extensive exclaims evaluathorough asscausation thalitigation. Thornton Tomtestimony bahelp clients dexecute apprexpertise incstabilization ocaused by ea Thornton Tomcollapses incAirport and dfailures are othat we invescomprehensdamage asseand repair sorange of struvisualization

rty Los

masetti speciand construcperience to aations. Our scsessment of dat can be use

masetti regulaased on our adetermine theropriate mitiga

cludes indoor of structures, arthquakes, e

masetti has bcluding the codamages causonly a small pstigate are meive evaluationessment survolutions. We hctures, and wtools to recon

ss Cons

alizes in invection materialassist attorneycientific invesdamage, as wed for retrofit,

arly provides nalyses. Furt

e vulnerability ation measurair quality, wi failure analy

explosions, fir

been called toollapse of a hased by Hurric

portion of our ferely a loss on of structuralveys, reliabilityhave unmatchwe use state-onstruct and ill

sulting

estigative engevaluation, p

ys and insurastigation proviwell as a profe

repair, claims

expert witnesthermore, we of a facility ares before failind damage esis and evalu

re or other ca

o investigate mangar roof at cane Ike. Howforensic expe

of functionalityl failures, incly and risk anahed forensic eof-the-art comlustrate failure

ineering and providing us wnce companiides our clienessional analys adjustment

ss reports anduse our expe

and develop alures occur. Oevaluations anuation of damauses.

major structurDulles Intern

wever, sensaterience. Most y or value. Weuding safety alysis, materiexperience on

mputer modelies.

with es with

nts with a ysis of or

d erience to and Our nd ages

ral ational ional failures

e offer and al testing, n a broad ing and

Page 12: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Building Information Modeling

Thornton Tomasetti is an industry leader in the implementation of BIM tools and the use of innovative project delivery methods. Years of routinely applying 3D integrated modeling have enabled us to customize processes and refine systems to optimize, automate and share models efficiently with clients, design team partners and contractors. Our in-house team of engineers and modelers works directly with software manufacturers to improve software packages. To streamline the modeling process, we have developed proprietary scripts and routines to fill interoperability gaps. Thornton Tomasetti’s strength in BIM lies in its many years of experience on many types of projects which translates into an improved design, more efficient work flow and better delivery process.

Thornton Tomasetti has been applying 3D integrated modeling methods for more than 15 years. Three projects were honored with 2014 American Institute of Architects (AIA) Technology in Architecture (TAP) Building Information Modeling (BIM) Awards, including Northwestern Medicine Outpatient Care Pavilion, which was awarded in the “Delivery Process Innovation” category. Two additional projects were recognized for “Stellar Architecture Using Steel” and “Delivery Process Innovation.”

Master Modeler and BIM Assistance

If requested, Thornton Tomasetti can lead the BIM implementation on a project, taking on the role of “Master Modeler” and integrating BIMs from all disciplines. In addition, we provide training and full-time assistance to those on the design team that have not been through a BIM project. We have BIM standards that can be shared with the design team and edited per project, template BIM forms to speed implementation, standard BIM processes and experience in setting up live shared models across different geographic locations. Our skills can help all design team members achieve the most benefits from the use of BIM.

Benefits of BIM

The benefits of BIM include improved drafting efficiency, production drawing quality, design team coordination, visualization, client communications, interoperability and design flexibility. These benefits translate into superior drawings, decreased production time and reduced costs to the owner. Downstream benefits include less schedule risk and reduced field problems.

Better Efficiency and Quality

Two-dimensional paper drawings are not eliminated in a BIM process. BIM is leveraged to automatically generate accurate construction documents cut from the BIM model, which eliminates much of the tedious 2D drafting process, and reduces human error. Sections may be linked to automatically update, not only saving time but also ensuring accuracy within a set of drawings. The use of BIM greatly improves design quality and drafting efficiency.

Improved Coordination

BIM facilitates real time coordination among disciplines and enables the design team to communicate more efficiently with the owner. Streamlined coordination and the use of clash detection during the design process equate to fewer field problems and help to keep costs within budget.

Page 13: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Building Information Modeling

Page 2 of 2

Superior Visualization and Communication

We are able take advantage of BIM to create 3D images and renderings, which are inherently more understandable than 2D drawings, to facilitate the clear communication of design issues. Also, animations and fly-throughs can be created quickly and frequently with the model and using our in-house “render farm” to explain complex concepts. Simple to use “web viewer” versions of BIM models can be created to allow those not trained in BIM to easily fly through the models and examine progress.

Increased Flexibility

BIM offers a more robust set of tools and methods to modify designs. Parametrics can generate numerous studies very quickly. Parametrics also allows us to accurately and easily manage last-minute design changes because they are automatically and effortlessly updated throughout project documents.

Interoperability and Automation

Thornton Tomasetti understands the current state of the industry and the lack of true intelligent interoperability. Due to the shortcomings of the IFC and CIS/2 formats, Thornton Tomasetti has grown an advanced automation division to write our own custom in-house translators and interoperability scripts, as needed, to assist the design team by creating a more efficient work flow for all.

Thornton Tomasetti writes customized in-house translators and interoperability scripts using application programming interface (API) to share intelligent BIM information with other software programs. This includes back and forth between Revit, Tekla, Autocad, Catia, SAP, ETABS, Rhino, and numerous other applications. Thornton Tomasetti’s automation staff can quickly write customized translators for job-specific problems and increase speed and production for a given process. Customized translators save the design team considerable time and alleviate many problems caused by the lack of an industry standard BIM format.

Software

Thornton Tomasetti has the most up-to-date BIM equipment with all building information modelers using Dell PC workstations with dual monitors. Our typical setup for a CAD workstation is dual quad core processors with 12GB of ram and high-speed SCSI hard drives. Approximately 200 operators have in-depth knowledge of AutoCAD, Revit, MicroStation, CATIA, etc. Revit Structure serves as our primary BIM production software. We are also industry-leading users of Revit Structure and have beta-tested many versions of Revit for Autodesk. Other BIM/CAD software used includes Microstation, Digital Project (CATIA), Tekla Structures, 3ds Max, Grasshopper and Rhino. Thornton Tomasetti has created a system that is integrated with all of our various analysis and design programs. This allows for fast turnaround time, overall accuracy and drawing quality impossible to achieve without BIM.

Page 14: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Integra

Thornton TomTekla, the preother BIM socontractors atranslators, th3D software. tool to be use

Steel DetaiFor steel projparticular benexposed to varchitect andaccurate biddphases.

Phase 1: 3D

All main structrusses are inwith the corremill test requ The completesteel fabricatthe purchaseover the tradthe model byconstruction Phase 1 modmore accuratand reduce ti

Phase 2: 3D

Depending omajor steel cConnections all connectionsplice plates,

The completefabricators tocontrol (CNCand connectibetter definespreparation aschedule andcomplexity. Tdetailer regar

ated Mo

masetti provideferred softwaftware and ge

and fabricatorshe Tekla modThese transl

ed for each jo

ling

jects, Thorntonefit for facilitiew. This allo coordinated ding. The deta

D Model of M

ctural steel franput into a Teect size, correirements--and

ed Phase 1, ator to quickly ge of structural itional proces

y the contractoscheduling, s

del will reducete material anime from awa

D Model of S

n the project,onnections ofwill include an material, su, shear plates

ed Phase 2 T

o quickly beginC) downloads,

on material qs scope and cand approval d potential forThornton Tomrding the imp

odeling

des detailing sare for detailienerates the rs. With Thorndel may be coators bring a

ob at each pha

on Tomasetti ties where coows the conne

with the desiailing models

Members

aming membeekla Structureect material pd correct orie

a Tekla modegenerate theisteel shapes

ss and eliminaor. The contrasequencing, ce quantity taknd labor estimard to materia

Steel Connec

, model eitherf main structu

all holes, boltsuch as base ps and connect

Tekla model cn to create sh, which link to

quantity take-ocomplexity reprocess, whic

r claims due tmasetti will pro

lementation o

g Servi

services for bing services, information s

nton Tomasetonverted to, o

powerful benase.

will design thnnections areections to be gn team and

s are typically

ers such as ces 3D model. properties--suentation.

el, can be useir Advanced Bs. This is a treates the re-cractor can usecash flow anake-off time durmates throughal order.

ctions

r all steel conural memberss, shop weldsplates, cap plation angles.

can be used bhop drawingso fabrication eoffs. The Pha

esulting in a stch can signifito lack of undovide assistanof the comple

ces

both steel andgoes beyond pecifically reqtti’s custom in

or from, Revit,nefit in allowin

he steel connee extremely codiscussed witcompletely dcompleted in

columns, beamMembers arech as yield st

ed by the contBill of Materiaemendous impeation or veri

e the model foalysis and tracring bidding, ph improved vis

nections or ms in the 3D mos, weld preparates, gussets

by contractors; computer nu

equipment; fiease 2 Tekla mtreamlined shcantly reduceerstanding ofnce to the fab

eted 3D mode

d precast. Revit or quired by n-house or any other

ng the right

ections; a omplex and th the efined for

n two

ms, and e entered trength and

tractors and als (ABM) for provement fication of

or cking. The provide for sualization

model the odel. rations, and , stiffeners,

s and steel umeric eld bolt lists;

model also hop drawing e project f true bricator’s el.

Page 15: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Integrated

Page 2 of 2

Precast DeThornton Tomby contractorallowing themdrawings. Thscheduling aprecast modelocations and

Schedule BConsiderablea Tekla modethe Advancedtime for biddigreater time sprecast modephase pullingthree to nine coordinating

Scope BenWhen using amodeled accbe understoocontractor caproject muchassociated w

ComplexityComplexity isthe ability to sprecast and csimultaneousneed to be cucan be highligof the risk of

d Modeling

tailing

masetti can crs. This modem to quickly be model can nd coordinatioel for coordinad coordination

Benefits

e time savingsel with steel ad Bill of Mateng and compsavings are ael since the cog this scope omonths and garound the ac

efits

a Tekla modeurately, the c

od much fastean pull accura quicker, imp

with misunders

y Benefits

s better showsee in 3D thecan use the msly. In the pasut to explain cghted and unclaims based

Services

reate a 3D mel can be reliebegin adding r

also be usedon. In additioation with sten with steel co

s and scheduand/or precasrials is ready

pleting the ABachievable whonnection mo

of work forwargives the desctual connect

el with steel mcontractor’s scer, a significanate quantities proving the timstood 2D draw

wn when usinge complexity omodel to see vst, when usingcomplex situanderstood veryd on misinterp

model of precaed on by the preinforcement

d for quantity tn, the steel fa

eel for items sonnections.

ule reduction cst. With a Pha

for the contraBM is significahen using a Podeling happerd, which cansign team the tions.

members, concope is shownnt improvemeand understa

me for biddingwings.

g a Tekla modof member gevarious discipg 2D documeations, but wity quickly. Thi

pretations of d

ast units in Teprecast contrat and create stake-offs, tracabricator can such as bearin

can be achievase 1 steel meactor and the antly reduced.Phase 2 steel ens during the reduce the sadded benef

nnections andn much cleareent over 2D dand the scopeg and reducing

del. The contreometry, connplines’ scope ents, many seth 3D, comples helps to elim

drawings or la

ekla, for use actor shop cking, use the

ng plate

ved by using ember model preparation

. Even model and e design schedule fit of

d/or precast er and can rawings. The

e of the g risk

ractor has nections and

ections would ex issues minate much ack of detail.

Page 16: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Representative Airport Terminal Experience

©Photography by MediaWright Photography

Indianapolis International Airport, Col. H. Weir Cook Terminal Indianapolis, IN

Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport, North Terminal Redevelopment Detroit, MI

O'Hare International Airport, United Airlines, Terminal 1 Chicago, IL

Indianapolis International Airport, Col. H. Weir Cook Terminal, Indianapolis, IN. Structural design of an award-winning 40-gate, 1.2-million-square-foot terminal building.

John F. Kennedy International Airport, TransWorld Airlines Passenger Terminal, Queens, NY. Structural design of a new passenger terminal. The project scope included a new 900,000-square-foot concourse, site and civil utilities.

Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport, North Terminal Redevelopment, Detroit, MI. Structural engineering and blast services for a two-level, 720,000-square-foot terminal that includes 31 gates. The one-half mile complex connects to an existing parking garage via an enclosed skywalk.

John F. Kennedy International Airport, Terminal 1, Jamaica, NY. Structural design of a 650,000-square-foot terminal that houses five international carriers. Terminal One is one of the first examples of seismic design in New York City. The project introduces the use of luffing bridges at the loading gates and features a variety of innovative design features, including radial box arches and curvilinear triangular trusses.

O’Hare International Airport, United Airlines, Terminal 1, Chicago, IL. Structural design of an award-winning clear-span terminal building that covers 373,000 square feet of space and houses two, parallel 1,600-foot-long concourses and baggage handling areas. The project includes architecturally exposed, artistically designed castellated structural steel.

Logan International Airport, South Terminal Complex, Boston, MA. Structural design of a multi-airline, 29-gate domestic terminal; a 2,800-car parking structure; taxiways; aprons; and road systems. Construction includes precast, prestressed concrete floors and structural steel columns.

Rickenbacker International Airport, International Facilities Complex, Phase I, Columbus, OH. Structural design of a 35,000-gross-square-foot terminal building with two gates and a concourse. The facility is designed to accommodate future expansion.

Guangzhou New Baiyun International Airport, Phase 2, Guangzhou, CHN. Structural engineering for Phase 2 of the 914,500-square-foot expansion of an existing airport. The project includes the design of two mirrored concourses and connecting buildings. The airport is the biggest airline hub in Southeast Asia and is capable of handling 25 million passengers and one million tons of cargo annually.

Carrasco International Airport, Roof, Montevideo, URY. Structural design of an award-winning 1,000-foot curved steel roof structure for a 344,000-square-foot terminal.

Page 17: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Representative Airport Terminal Experience

Page 2 of 5

Carrasco International Airport, Roof Montevideo, URY

Ataturk International Airport Istanbul, TUR

Memphis International Airport, Concourse B Retail Reconfiguration Memphis, TN

Second Bangkok International Airport, Terminal, Bangkok, THA. Structural engineering for a terminal complex that includes parking, office space, baggage-handling systems, and an automated people mover capable of handling 30 million travelers a year.

King Abdulaziz International Airport, Jeddah, KSA. Structural design and building skin consulting services for the design-build expansion of an existing airport terminal. Scope includes review of structural submissions for technical compliance with contract documents, verification of coordination, monitoring of design progress, and liaising between the design and construction teams.

Ataturk International Airport, Istanbul, TUR. Structural engineering for the structural repairs and retrofits of an airport, which sustained earthquake damage. The rapid retrofit allowed the terminal to open on time and enabled the owner to begin realizing revenues quickly. The scheme, which avoided interference with completed portions of the building, saved both time – the project was completed in a record four months – and expense.

O’Hare International Airport, United Airlines, Terminal 1, Curbside Addition and South Building Addition, Chicago, IL. Structural design, blast mitigation and curtain wall consulting services for a renovation and addition to a terminal building. The curbside addition involved moving the façade 20 feet toward the roadway, and the expansion added a new security checkpoint and a circulation area between Terminals 1 and 2.

Memphis International Airport, Concourse B, Retail Reconfiguration, Memphis, TN. Structural design of the reconstruction of a concourse to transform a narrow, dim space into a light-filled area with ample concession stands. Structural modifications included removing four existing columns and an 80-foot by 80-foot portion of the roof. The renovation was completed under the 2003 International Building Code, Seismic Design Category D, which was new at the time of design.

Ontario International Airport, On-Call Engineering Services, Ontario, CA. Design services related to various interior renovations of Terminal 1A for Delta Airlines. The tasks included design services for a roof that had suffered a partial collapse. Scope included development of repair drawings, and design of support for a roof screen and mechanical units.

O’Hare International Airport, Terminal 1 and Terminal 2 Link, Chicago, IL. Structural engineering for a landside connection between existing terminals.

Ontario International Airport, On-Call Engineering Services, Ontario, CA. Engineering services related to an existing pedestrian bridge and a separate, existing rail bridge. Both structures were required to support new signage over Archibald Avenue. Several additional street signs will be constructed along Archibald Avenue.

O'Hare International Airport, Terminal 2, CTX Relocations, Chicago, IL. Structural analysis of existing floor framing to accommodate the relocation of several CTX machines.

Page 18: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Representative Airport Terminal Experience

Page 3 of 5

Los Angeles International Airport, On-Call Engineering Services, Vertical Transportation Upgrades Los Angeles, CA

Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Automated People Mover Dallas, TX

John F. Kennedy International Airport, Jet Blue Terminal, New Grandstand Structure and Cable Structure New York, NY

O’Hare International Airport, United Airlines, Terminal 1, Baggage Induction, Chicago, IL. Structural engineering for a 300-square-foot conveyer structure addition that includes a catwalk connecting the existing terminal and existing skycap building.

O’Hare International Airport, American Airlines, In-Line EDS Baggage System, Chicago, IL. Structural consulting for the integration of an in-line

baggage system at Terminal 3.

O'Hare International Airport, Terminal 1, Verti-Merge Baggage Device Installation, Chicago, IL. Structural engineering to enlarge an existing floor opening and modify existing framing for the installation of a Verti-Merge baggage device for the UAL.com and Global Services spaces.

O'Hare International Airport, Terminal 1, Kiosk Renovations, Chicago, IL. Structural engineering for the reconfiguration of five existing baggage kiosks. Scope included renovation of two kiosks, reconstruction of three kiosks and modifications to each kiosk’s baggage conveyor.

O’Hare International Airport, Terminal 1, Vestibules, Chicago, IL. Design services for new entrance vestibules. Services included structural, blast and curtain wall.

Phoenix Sky Harbor International, Foundation Design, Phoenix, AZ. Structural foundation designs for the reconfiguration of a boarding gate.

O’Hare International Airport, Concourses E, F, and G, Chicago, IL. Structural design development, including a structural audit and feasibility studies, of a major renovation to accommodate a food court.

Los Angeles International Airport, On-Call Engineering Services, Vertical Transportation Upgrades, Los Angeles, CA. Vertical transportation replacement of 98 escalators and six moving walkways in all eight terminals of the airport.

Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Automated People Mover, Dallas, TX. Consulting services to the design team and project architect for the custom unitized curtain wall and the design of the back-up steel tube trusses spanning 65 feet.

O’Hare International Airport, United Airlines, Terminal 1, Equipment Modernization Program, Escalator Remediation, Chicago, IL. Structural engineering to review and revise existing escalator and sump pits.

John F. Kennedy International Airport, Jet Blue Terminal, New Grandstand Structure and Cable Structure, New York, NY. Structural engineering for a new concourse level grandstand structure and cable structure as part of the tenant improvement work being performed at the new Jet Blue Terminal.

Newark Liberty International Airport, Terminal A, Modernization, Newark, NJ. Design services for vertical circulation improvements.

Page 19: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Representative Airport Terminal Experience

Page 4 of 5

San Francisco International Airport Terminal Two Renovation – Exterior San Francisco, CA

San Francisco International Airport Terminal Two Renovation – Interior San Francisco, CA

American Airlines Offices Tenant Improvement, SFO Terminal 2 San Francisco, CA

American Airlines Admiral’s Club, SFO Terminal Two, San Francisco, CA. LEED peer review of facility providing amenities such as complimentary wi-fi, conference rooms, spa-like showers, and food service. The project includes extensive HVAC and lighting zoning for efficiency and occupant comfort, an aggressive waste management program, and green material selections, such as recessed panels of bamboo. The project also takes full advantage of the Terminal 2 sustainable features. The project is LEED for Interior Design + Construction Silver certified.

American Airlines Offices, Tenant Improvement, SFO Terminal Two, San Francisco, CA. Sustainability and LEED consulting services for a tenant build-out project including ramp office operations support spaces; baggage service office; airline ticket office; ticket lift office; and AA credit union. This project was American Airlines’ first attempt to use the LEED rating system. Green strategies include finish material selections, effective utilization of the base building’s HVAC system, and energy-efficient lighting controls. The project is LEED for Interior Design + Construction Gold certified.

San Diego Regional Airport, Green Build Project, San Diego, CA. LEED auditing for roadway reconfiguration and a terminal expansion, adding 10 gates, aircraft parking, and other services. Two buildings within the overall project are targeting LEED-NC Silver certification. The LEED auditing scope includes reviewing progress towards the LEED target, providing a gap analysis of the LEED status, and identifying risks and potential mitigation measures related to meeting the LEED target.

San Francisco International Airport, Boarding Area E, Terminal Three, San Francisco, CA. LEED and sustainability consulting for a major renovation of Boarding Area E which provides expanded operations to multiple airlines. The existing boarding area was stripped back to its structural frame and then expanded at the boarding level to increase floor area. Airport goals include improving energy efficiency in lighting and energy systems, upgrading 30-year-old control systems, and refreshing a decade-old interior with new, green interior finishes.

San Francisco International Airport, Terminal Three East Improvements, San Francisco, CA. LEED and sustainability consulting for a major renovation and addition to a key area of the terminal including a passenger security checkpoint. The addition provides space for airport and airlines back-of-house functions. The project scope includes LEED facilitation and evaluation of sustainability strategies to assure LEED-NC Gold certification. Strategies evaluated for the project include renewable energy, vegetated green roofs, and LEED Campus/Master Site credits.

San Francisco International Airport, Master Architect Terminal One, San Francisco, CA. Sustainability and LEED-NC consulting to create a comprehensive programming and planning document for the Terminal 1 Complex Redevelopment program. The scope includes the Air Traffic Control Tower and Boarding Areas B and C.

Page 20: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Representative Airport Terminal Experience

Page 5 of 5

Virgin America Back of House Tenant Improvements, SFO Terminal 2 San Francisco, CA

San Francisco International Airport, LEED EBOM Assessment and Feasibility Study, San Francisco, CA. LEED consulting for a feasibility study to secure LEED EBOM certification for the entire Terminal Complex. Green strategies include examining energy-efficiency projects, plumbing fixture retrofits, low mercury lighting, and janitorial products and standards. Project tasks have included clarifying LEED EBOM requirements for energy benchmarking of airport terminals – a unique and energy-intensive facility type not specifically identified in the LEED or EnergySTAR rating systems.

San Francisco International Airport, Terminal Two Renovation, San Francisco, CA. LEED consulting services for a LEED NC Gold-certified, 600,061-square-foot renovation of an existing airport terminal to house American Airlines and Virgin America. Surpassing City and County requirements, the project achieved a LEED for New Construction Gold rating. The project includes many sustainability highlights, including skylights and clerestories that bring daylight into the ticketing lobby and retail areas. In addition to significantly reducing electric lighting requirements during daylight hours, these features provide a healthier working environment.

Virgin America Airlines, Back of House Tenant Improvements, San Francisco International Airport Terminal Two, Francisco, CA. Sustainability and LEED consulting for a build-out project including Virgin Village operations support spaces, baggage service office, and airline ticket office. Sustainability strategies are very-high-efficiency lighting, improved plumbing fixtures, and green materials. The project met multiple green requirements for products including recycled content, regional content, rapidly renewable materials, and certified wood. The project is LEED for Interior Design + Construction Platinum certified.

San Francisco International Airport, Terminal Two to Terminal Three Secure Connector, San Francisco, CA. LEED-NC facilitation guidance and sustainability consultation for a critical section of the airport facility that bridges two terminals on the secure air side of the facility.

United Airlines, Flight Operations, San Francisco International Airport Terminal Three, San Francisco, CA. LEED-CI facilitation and sustainability consulting for a back-of-house interior fit-out project that occupies space in the new LEED-NC Boarding Area E facility. LEED services began at pre-design and continue through project completion.

Page 21: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

O’Hare International Airport

United Airlines Terminal One

Chicago, Illinois

Owner Chicago Department of Aviation Architect Murphy/Jahn with A. Epstein and Sons Contractor Turner Construction Completion Date 1988 Construction Cost $450 million Awards James F. Foundation Gold Award American Institute of Steel Construction American Institute of Architects Honor Award NY Association of Consulting Engineers American Consulting Engineers Council

Thornton Tomasetti provided structural design services for the new United Airlines terminal. The project includes 42 gates in two parallel, 1,600-foot concourses and baggage handling areas. The long-span ticketing area serves as the dramatic entrance to the structure with 1,730-foot-long vaulted gate areas. The ticketing pavilion features folded plate trusses creating a 120-foot by 810-foot column-free area.

Page 22: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Guangzhou New Baiyun International Airport, Phase Two

Guangzhou, China

Owner Guangzhou New Baiyun Airport

Client/Architect Molen Associates

Completion Date 2010

Construction Cost $108 million

Total Area 914,500 sf (85,000 square meters)

Thornton Tomasetti provided structural design services for the expansion of a new Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport that accomodates approximately 80 million passengers. Phase Two of the Guangzhou New Baiyun International Airport includes two mirrored concourses and connecting buildings.

The airport is the biggest airline hub next to Southeast Asia, meeting the demands of the growing Pearl River Delta area. It is located about 17 miles (28 kilometers) from downtown Guangzhou and is capable of handling 25-million passengers and one million tons of cargo annually.

Page 23: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

John F. Kennedy International Airport Terminal One

Jamaica, New York

Owner Terminal One Group Association (TOGA)

Client/Architect William Nicholas Bodouva & Associates

General Contractor AMEC Construction Management (formerly Morse Diesel International Inc.)

Completion Date 1998

Construction Cost $435 million

Total Area 650,000 sf

Terminal One is the first new terminal complex in 25 years. Terminal One Group Association (TOGA), a consortium of four airlines: Air France, Lufthansa, Japan Airlines, and Korean Airlines wished to introduce international innovations in airport terminal design to America. To meet the client’s major objective of designing a world-class, state-of-the-art facility, the design team created innovative layout and structural geometry that also provided a maximum amount of aircraft gate positions on a tight sight and a fast-track schedule.

The two-level main terminal is trapezoidal in plan, with the 565-foot-long north side (landside) straight and the 750-foot-long south side (airside) bending in the gradual arc. The facility has two concourses - a three-gate west concourse that runs longitudinally against the curved south side and a finger-like south concourse that juts 679 feet into the apron. The roof is framed by twenty-six, 140-foot-long steel box girders in the shape of continuous leaping radial arches with tie rods stretching between arch ends.

Adding to the challenges of the project’s structural design was the requirement to design to the newly adopted seismic code for New York City. By integrating bracing into the lower, arrival level, the cost of the facility was greatly reduced. Similar savings were achieved in the detailing of the arch box girders, which had a pi-shaped cross section instead of a flush box shape, allowing fabrication with fillet weld instead of penetration welds, resulting in great cost economies.

Page 24: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport North Terminal Redevelopment

Detroit, Michigan

Owner Wayne County Airport Authority

Architect Gensler

Associate Architect Ghafari Architects

Contractor Walbridge Aldinger Company/ Barton Malow

Completion Date 2008

Construction Cost

$298 million

Total Area 720,000 sf

Images by Vito Palmisano and Gensler

Thornton Tomasetti provided structural engineering and blast services for a new terminal complex that accommodates 31 gates at Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport.

The two-level structure, composed of 720,000 square feet, runs one-half mile and connects to an existing parking structure via an enclosed skywalk. The upper level, filled with as much natural light as possible, contains ticket areas, luggage check-in, security, and retail. The lower level houses security areas, baggage, and other airport functions.

Page 25: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Carrasco International Airport Roof Montevideo, Uruguay

Owner

Puerta del Sur S.A.

Client/Architect Rafael Viñoly Architects PC

Completion Date

2009

Construction Cost $132.5 million

Total Area

344,000 gsf

Award Platinum Award 2010 in the Category of Transportation, ACEC New York Engineering Excellence Awards The International Architecture Award 2010, The Chicago Athenaeum/Europe

The Carrasco International Airport in Uruguay, the largest airport in the country, is expected to serve up to 2.8 million passengers by 2010. The new 344,000-square-foot, three-story terminal is a dramatic and welcoming space for the passengers and visitors. The terminal aims to modernize and expand the passenger and cargo handling capacity of the existing facilities to promote tourism and commercial growth in the surrounding region.

Thornton Tomasetti was responsible for the structural design of the terminal’s 1,000-foot-long curved steel roof structure. The curved roof maintains a low profile on the landscape, helping its structure integrate into the surrounding. The unique roof extends beyond the building on all four sides. The curved roof has an irregular plan profile with the width varying from 415 feet to 165 feet. In addition, the steel-truss roof has an irregular vertical profile with its two ends supported on grade and the height of the roof varies from 85 feet to 120 feet. The cantilevered roof facilitates the strategic use of daylighting for the terminal building by creating shading for the interior space.

The 60-foot-high fully glazed curtain wall system extending from the base to the roof wraps around the terminal building, creating transparency. In response to the challenge of providing draining for the large roof area, two gutters, one at each cantilevered edge, was provided for the entire length of the roof to capture rainwater run-off for the huge roof area.

Page 26: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

King Abdulaziz International Airport Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Architect Atkins

General Contractor Saudi Binladin Group

Completion Date 2014

Construction Cost $7 billion

Number of Stories 3

King Abdulaziz International Airport has embarked on an ambitious expansion program that will allow up to 80 million passengers to pass through its terminals each year. Thornton Tomasetti assisted the design-build team with design completion management services for building structure throughout design of the first phase of the project. Thornton Tomasetti worked within the design management team’s Jeddah office to provide immediate quality control assistance, including review of structural design submissions for technical compliance with contract documents, verification that coordination between various design teams has been completed, monitoring of design progress versus project program, and liaising between design and construction teams.

Phase 1 includes construction of a new 766,000-square-meter terminal building with lightweight roof structure and transparent façade, an air traffic control tower, utility load centers, parking structures, a railway station, data centers, a mosque, and supporting facilities, including a main rescue and fire fighting facility. This project phase will provide capacity for 30 million passengers per year.

The new terminal, servicing both international and domestic flights, will include a central garden, a hotel, retail areas, and lounges. Parking will be available for 5,700 vehicles, and a new train station will provide a railway linking the airport to Jeddah and Mecca. At 136 meters, the new air traffic control tower will be the tallest in the world.

Page 27: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Indianapolis International Airport Col. H. Weir Cook Terminal

Indianapolis, Indiana

Owner Indianapolis Airport Authority

Architect Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum

Structural Design Thornton Tomasetti, Inc.

Engineer of Record Fink Roberts & Petrie

Contractor Hunt-Smoot Midfield Builders

Completion Date 2008

Construction Cost $350 million

Total Area 1.2 million sf

Number of Gates 40

Awards Award of Merit, Midwest Construction Magazine, 2008

©Photography by MediaWright Photography

Thornton Tomasetti provided structural design services for a new 40-gate airport terminal, which is constructed near an existing airport that was built in 1970.

The main terminal roof is supported on column “trees” constructed from four pipe column sections that splay in four directions as they reach the roof trusses. These trees, spaced 120 feet to150 feet apart, leave a vast open space to accommodate the ticketing area. A circular, glass skylight covers the spacious Civic Plaza on the ticketing level. The top and bottom chords of the roof trusses are segmented to match the surface of the roof, which curves in two directions. Two concourse arms extend from the terminal and lead to the departure gates.

Offices and mechanical levels are located above the departure level. A mezzanine slab between the arrival and departure levels supports the baggage screening system. The basement level supports the baggage handling conveyors to and from the arrival level.

Page 28: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Memphis International Airport Concourse B Modernization

Memphis, Tennessee

Owner Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority

Client / Architects UrbanARCH Associates and Alliance Architecture

Completion Date

Phase 1: 2015 Phase 2: 2020

Construction Cost $114 million

Total Area 350,000 sf

Renderings courtesy of UrbanARCH Associates

Thornton Tomasetti is providing structural engineering services for the two phases of the Concourse Modernization Program at Memphis International Airport.

In Phase 1, the scope includes removing the ends of Concourses A and C to promote future growth and for the planes to taxi with more ease. Phase 2 will widen Concourse B to allow for more open pathways so that passengers can more easily get to flights. Moving walkways will be added, as well as natural lighting, which will come from higher ceilings and additional windows. All three concourses will be consolidated into one, significantly improving passenger flow. In total, the airport will have about 60 gates at the end of the renovation compared to the 80 it had before the renovation. The renovation will also include a seismic upgrade to meet the requirements for seismic category D of the International Building Code.

Page 29: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Memphis International Airport, Concourse B,Y Hub Retail Reconstruction

Memphis, Tennessee

Owner Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority

Client / Architects

Alliance Architecture

Completion Date 2005

Construction Cost

$7 million

Total Area 50,000 sf

Thornton Tomasetti provided structural engineering services for the renovation of the Y-Hub of Concourse B at Memphis International Airport. The program called for reconfiguring the “Y-shaped” Concourse B into a rotunda, raising the roof, adding clerestory windows and skylights and incorporating art.

The overall effect transforms the existing space from a narrow and dim junction to a light-filled area with ample concession stands. Structural modifications included removal of four existing columns and an 80-foot by 80-foot portion of the roof, as well as other upgrades to meet more stringent requirements for seismic category D of the International Building Code.

Page 30: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

OC

AH

CO

C$

Owner City of Los Ang

Architect HOK

Completion DaOngoing

Contract Amou$2.5 million

geles

ate

unt

Los AnOn-CaOntario a

Thornton Tomvarious projeAirport, Van N

Task 001services foall eight te

Task 002for variousincluded dScope inca roof scre

Task 006services fobridge. BoArchibald along Arch

Task 016Structural report for to office u

ngeles all Engiand Los An

masetti is proects at Los AnNuys Airport,

: Los Angeleor the replaceerminals of th

: Ontario Intes interior renodesign servicecluded develoeen and mech

: Ontario Inteor an existingoth structuresAvenue. Sevhibald Avenu

: Los Angeleengineering a proposed cse and to me

World neeringngeles, C

oviding on-calngeles Interna

and Palmdal

es Internationement of 98 ee airport.

ernational Aovations of Tees for a roof t

opment of rephanical units.

ernational Ag pedestrian bs were requireveral additionae.

es Internationservices for t

conversion of eet building co

Airportg Serv

California

l engineering ational Airportle Regional A

nal Airport, Lescalators and

irport, Ontarerminal 1A forthat had suffeair drawings, .

irport, Ontarbridge and a sed to support al street signs

nal Airport, Lthe developma Continenta

odes.

ts ices, V

design servict, Ontario Inte

Airport.

Los Angeles, d six moving

io, CA. Desigr Delta Airline

ered a partial cand design o

io, CA. Enginseparate, exisnew signage s will be cons

Los Angeles, ment of a buildal Airlines train

Various

ces for ernational

CA. Design walkways in

n services es. The tasks collapse.

of support for

eering sting rail over

structed

CA. ding analysis ning center

Page 31: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

DFW Automated People Mover Dallas Fort Worth, Texas

Owner DFW Airport Board

Client Brown & Root Services

Design Architect Corgan Architects

General Contractor Hensel Phelps Construction Co.

Completion Date 2004

Thornton Tomasetti provided consulting services to the design team and project architect for the exterior curtain wall system for the Automated People Mover at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. Composed of structural steel trusses, the back-up system has vertical spans that reach up to 60 feet.The steel trusses are constructed from steel pipes for both vertical and diagonal members. Custom connections were required to accommodate the support of the freestanding curved roof also supported by the trusses.

Thornton Tomasetti also provided curtain wall consulting services to the architect for the design and analytical review of the custom curtain wall. The coordination between curtain wall support details, anticipated wind movements, and deflection of the supporting floor structure was especially challenging.

Page 32: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

OJ

ARG

S2

C2

CL

T1

AAS

Owner JetBlue Airways

Architect Rockwell GroupGensler

Start Date 2005

Completion Da2008

Construction CLess than $1 m

Total Area 15,000 sf

Awards APEX for Top HSpace Category

s

p

ate

Cost million

Honors in the Py, 2009

Public

John FJetBlueSculptNew York

Thornton Tominstallation oflevel grandstat John F. Ke

The digital sigtravel experieentertainmen

The installationine-ton, 38-f244 stainlesschallenge factension. Roboanalysis to kedesign.

F. Kenne Termural Insk, New Yo

masetti providf fanned cabletand as part oennedy Intern

gnage ring coence for custont videos and

on is composfoot-wide by 4

s steel cablesced by the deot software paeep the cable

nedy Inminal stallatioork

ded structurales supporting

of the tenant bnational Airpo

omplements tomers by broatravel update

sed of 43 40-i48-foot-long o

s attached to 4esign team waackage was u

es from slacki

nternati

on

l engineering g an LED dispbuild-out for thrt.

the JetBlue bradcasting Jetes.

nch monitorsoval suspend480 points onas keeping theutilized to prong and disrup

ional A

for a sculptuplay and a conhe new JetBlu

rand and enhtBlue logos, a

connected toed from the c

n the oval. Thee suspension

ovide the necepting the arch

Airport,

ral ncourse ue Terminal

hances the advertising,

o form a ceiling by e main

n cables in essary hitectural

Page 33: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Incheon International Airport Phase III

Incheon, South Korea

Owner Incheon International Airport Corporation

Client/Architect Heerim

Completion Date 2017

Construction Cost $1.8 billion

Total Area 350,000 m

2

Thornton Tomasetti is providing structural peer review services for Terminal 2 at Incheon International Airport in South Korea. The airport will have a gross area of 350,000 square meters, 37 gates and consist of four floors above grade, one floor below grade and a roof structure. Structural system diagram indicates the main functional areas have been unitized to create an elegant airport structure. Structural challenges are to collaborate attributes such as structural safety, efficiency, constructability and cost savings while providing an exceeding structure.

Page 34: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

San Francisco International Airport Terminal 2 Renovation

San Francisco, California

Owner City and County of San Francisco

Client / Architect Gensler

Contractor Turner Construction Company.

Energy / HVAC Engineer KEMA, Inc.

Plumbing Engineer SJ Engineers

Electrical Engineer FW Engineers

Completion Date 2011

Construction Cost $383 million

Total Area 600,061 sf

LEED Certification NC Gold

Services LEED Consulting

Awards AIASF Design Award - 2013

© Bruce Damonte

© Bruce Damonte

The renovated Terminal 2 serves as the new home for San Francisco-based American Airlines and Virgin America. One of the first LEED Gold terminals in the United States, the 600,000-square-foot-plus modernization sets a new standard for travel. Simon & Associates, acquired by Thornton Tomasetti in December 2012, was the LEED consultant on the project.

The project includes skylights and clerestories that bring daylight into the lobby and retail areas, significantly reducing electric lighting requirements during the day. An innovative displacement ventilation system uses filtered air to improve indoor air quality and reduces energy consumption by 20 percent. Sustainable building materials include terrazzo flooring with recycled glass chips and recycled-content carpet. The innovative and efficient use of structural steel led to a reduction in materials and allowed more than 90 percent of construction waste to be successfully recycled. The selected plumbing fixtures reduce potable water usage by 40 percent, and innovative "hydration stations" allow passengers to refill water bottles, reducing both waste generation and the carbon footprint. The project includes a rainwater harvesting system that meets 100 percent of irrigation needs.

Originally constructed in 1954, the improved Terminal 2 surpasses the City and County of San Francisco’s sustainability goals for the renovation.

Page 35: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

United Airlines Terminal 1

Curbside Addition and South Building Addition

O’Hare International Airport, Chicago, Illinois

Owner

Chicago Department of Aviation

Client United Airlines

Architect Solomon Cordwell Buenz

Contractor Lend Lease

Completion Date Curbside Addition Blast and Curtain Wall Services: 2007 South Building Addition: 2007

Construction Cost $17.5 million (Curbside Addition) $9 million (South Building Addition)

Thornton Tomasetti provided structural design, blast mitigation and façade engineering consulting services for the $26.5 million renovation and addition to United Airlines’ Terminal 1 at O’Hare International Airport.

The curbside addition involved the reconstruction and extension of the existing 750-foot-long terminal, by moving the façade 20 feet out toward the roadway, to contain new glass-enclosed vestibules and curbside check-in locations with small canopies.

Thornton Tomasetti also provided blast mitigation services for the existing façade along the entire eastern exposure. The 10,000-square-foot south building addition consisted of a single-story expansion of the existing terminal building for a new security checkpoint and added circulation between Terminals 1 and 2. The south building expansion also included provisions for the addition of a future mezzanine level.

Page 36: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

In

C

C

nterior of Ataturk

Column Diagram

Column Jacket

k Airport Termina

al

AtaturIstanbul,

The earthquwidespread structures aAirport in Istconsortium, InternationaIstanbul to astructure anteam deviseseismic upgevent of anoand implemterminal to bJanuary 200

The reinforc240-meter (nearly 95 pebuilding waselements. Timprove theretrofit on a

The retrofit stechniques. used sophishow to reinfoThe technicfriction pendsupporting itduring an eaconcrete coresistance a

The rapid reto begin reawith complestrengtheninupgrade sho50 percent spermitting aevent.

This project Engineeringas a DiamonEngineering

rk Inter Turkey

uake that strudamage, eveffected was thtanbul, then uTepe-Akfen-

al LLC, retaineanalyze the dand develop a sed an ingeniougrade that wouother major quentation, wasbe completed00.

ced concrete s787.4-foot) byercent comples attributed tohe need for r building’s sestructure still

scheme was The enginee

sticated reseaorce the buildal team deciddulum bearingt. These allowarthquake, relumns were s

and ductility.

etrofit allowedalizing revenueted portions ong seismic resould enable thstronger than ccess in and

was awardedg Companies nd Award fromg Companies,

rnationa

ck northern Ten to buildingshe new passeunder constru-Vie, and its ced Thornton Tamage, evaluscheme to imus plan, incluuld enable theuake. The pro

s accomplishe in time for its

superstructury 168-meter (ete when the o the incompleremediation beismic perform under constr

developed thers brought in arch tools to hding and test ded to isolate gs as seismicw the roof to sducing the de

steel-jacketed

d the terminal es quickly. Thof the buildingsistance beyohe building to that of 1999 out of the cos

d a Grand Awfor the 2002 m the New Yo also in 2002

al Airpo

Turkey on Augs far from its enger termina

uction. The locconstruction cTomasetti anduate the seism

mprove its seisuding solutione terminal to ocess, from eed in less thans originally sc

re and steel s(551.18-foot) earthquake sete state of ceecame an op

mance, in efferuction.

hrough an unuspecialists in

help identify ththe efficacy othe steel-fram

c isolators at tswing indepenemand on thed and filled wit

to open on tihe scheme, wg, saved bothond local deso withstand a

and continuesmopolitan ci

ward from the Engineering Eork Chapter o.

ort

gust 17, 1999epicenter. Amal at Ataturk Ical build-oper

consultant, Tud Tuncel Engmic resistancesmic performas never beforremain functi

evaluation thron four months

cheduled inau

space-frame rthree-story te

struck. The daertain key stru

pportunity to eect, to perform

usual combinan seismic anahe damage, dof the proposeme roof, by inthe tops of thendently from

e columns belth grout for in

me and enabwhich avoidedh time and expign requiremedesign magn

e to perform itity after a ser

American CoExcellence Awof the America

9 caused mong the nternational rate-transfer urner ineering of e of the ance. The re used, for a onal in the ough design s, allowing the

uguration in

roof of the erminal were amage to the uctural

enhance and m a seismic

ation of lysis who

determine ed solutions. nstalling e columns side to side ow. The

ncreased

bled the owned interferencepense. In ents, the itude quake ts vital role in ious seismic

ouncil of wards as welan Council of

e

r

l

Page 37: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Representative Hangar Experience

Hamad International Airport, Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Facility Doha, QAT

San Francisco International Airport and Los Angeles International Airport, American Airlines, Heavy Maintenance Hangars San Francisco and Los Angeles, CA

Memphis International Airport, FedEx A380 Hangar Facility Memphis, TN

Dulles International Airport, Dulles Jet Center Hangars, Herndon, VA. Structural design of four identical 42,300-square-foot hangars. Each steel-framed structure will be 42 feet tall and span 165 feet. The new hangars make use of existing pile-cap and pile foundations from previously demolished structures.

Dulles International Airport, General Dynamics Hangar Renovation, Herndon, VA. Structural design of the renovation of 18,000 square feet of reception and office space within a two-story corporate aviation hangar. The creation of a double-height lobby area included removal of the structural slab, shoring of the roof system and replacement of the exterior columns with elegant tube steel columns, and replacement of the existing exterior wall system with a glass curtain wall. The project included modification of the exterior building canopy and the addition of under-floor heating air distribution within the lobby.

Hamad International Airport, Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Facility, Doha, QAT. Lead structural consultant to the design-build team for a 1.3-million-square-foot dual hangar facility capable of accommodating Airbus A380 Aircraft. The roofs of the hangars span 600 feet and 725 feet, respectively. The complex contains multistory maintenance space with floor-mounted docks and overhead cranes. Scope includes peer review of the facility's structural design.

San Francisco International Airport, American Airlines, Line Maintenance Hangar, San Francisco, CA. Structural design of a 450,000-square-foot hangar for four 747 aircraft. The project included shops, equipment, a 2.5-million gallon sprinkler deluge system, an overhead crane, aprons and taxiways.

Los Angeles International Airport, American Airlines, Heavy Maintenance Hangar, Los Angeles, CA. Structural design of a 450,000-square-foot facility. The project scope included equipment, shops, storage, aprons and taxiways, and fire protection system for four 747s with expansion capability to house 10 747s at the same time.

Memphis International Airport, FedEx Airbus A380 Hangar Facility, Memphis, TN. Structural design of an Airbus A380 hangar facility and support buildings. Located near the highly seismic New Madrid Fault Zone, the structure was designed and detailed per the 2003 International Building Code, Seismic Design Category D. The hangar has a 400-foot-long main span and 340-foot depth. The main roof steel framing was designed to accommodate four bridge cranes that support telescoping platforms and 15-ton hoists.

Presidential Helicopter Program Support Facility, Naval Air Station, Patuxent River, MD. Structural engineering services for a 202,000-square-foot aviation facility that includes a high-bay, Type II hangar, and spaces for engineering, logistics, flight testing/evaluation, maintenance and program team administration. The structure features long-span hangar bays, SCIF rooms and blast-resistant design characteristics.

Page 38: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Representative Hangar Experience

Page 2 of 3

Westover Air Force Base, Maintenance Hangar Westover Air Force Base, MA

Private Aviation Facility Trenton, NJ

Quantico Marine Corps Base, Greenside Hangar Complex Quantico, VA

McGuire Air Force Base, C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, Trenton, NJ. Structural engineering services for the design-build of a 120,000-square-foot maintenance hangar. The building is designed to house the Boeing Globemaster C-17 aircraft, which is capable of transporting M-1 tanks, Chinook helicopters and other heavy construction equipment. The outside perimeter of the hangar measures 400 feet by 300 feet and reaches a height of 100 feet. The structure, which is used for heavy maintenance, can accommodate a single C-17 or K-10 aircraft in either tail-in or nose-in scenarios.

Westover Air Force Base, Maintenance Hangar, MA. Structural design of a 94,000-square-foot maintenance / wash / de-icing hangar for C-5A aircraft.

Trenton-Mercer County Airport, Private Aviation Facility, Trenton, NJ. Structural design of a 90,000-square-foot hangar building. Scope included complete architectural and engineering design services for the Group I aviation facility, which features office and shop space. Located on a 13-acre site, the complex includes underslab and apron radiant heating, fully air-conditioned hangar areas, and a fueling station. The structure is designed to accommodate a variety of aircraft, including Sikorsky S-76B Helicopters, Gulfstream IV and Vs and 737 Boeing Business Jets.

Newark International Airport, Continental Airlines Maintenance Hangar, Newark, NJ. Design services for a new 70,000-square-foot line maintenance hangar that houses Boeing 747 aircraft. The project includes a fire protection system, offices, shops and apron rehabilitation.

Quantico Marine Corps Base, Greenside Hangar Complex, Quantico, VA. Structural engineering and construction support services for a 64,000-square-foot, multi-use military complex. The design-build facility, which is expected to meet LEED Silver requirements, includes Type II hangar space for HMX-1 “Nighthawk” helicopters, a multistory maintenance shop, and administrative, medical, storage and support areas. Project scope included the design of all connections, development of an integrated Tekla model and production of steel shop drawings.

Andrews Air Force Base, C-130B Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, Camp Spring, MD. Structural design and project management for a 50,000-square-foot hangar extension to the existing aircraft maintenance hangar.

McGuire Air Force Base, C-141 B Maintenance Hangars, NJ. Structural design of two new maintenance hangars, one measuring 45,000 square feet and the other 37,000 square feet, capable of accommodating C-141 B aircraft.

Lucent Technologies Private Aircraft Hangar, Morristown, NJ. Structural design of a 40,000-square-foot private aircraft hangar and 12,000 square feet of administrative offices for Lucent Technologies. The hangar has space for maintenance, storage of corporate jets and de-icing equipment. Scope included design of aircraft pavements and site work.

Page 39: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Representative Hangar Experience

Page 3 of 3

Mitchell Air Force Base Milwaukee, WI

Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin Hangar Evaluation Tustin, CA

Orange County Great Park, Hangar 296 Seismic Retrofit Feasibility Study Irvine, CA

Teterboro Airport, Atlantic Aviation Hangar, Teterboro, NJ. Structural design of a new 33,000-square-foot Group II aircraft hangar with an attached two-story, lean-to structure that provide 6,100 square feet of additional space for shops and offices. Services included architectural, structural, mechanical, and electrical and fire protection design including associated sitework, utilities and paving.

Newark International Airport, Design of Corporate Aviation Center, Newark, NJ. Structural design of a 20,000-square-foot hangar, a 15,000-square-foot hangar, an 18,000-square-foot maintenance storage hangar, and a 10,000-square-foot general aviation terminal. Site work consists of 40 acres, and includes parking for employees and visitors, new aircraft ramp pavement, and storm, fire protection and lighting systems.

Newark International Airport, Butler Aviation Facility, Newark, NJ. Structural design and construction services for a 15,000-square-foot storage hangar, 8,000-square-foot terminal, truck maintenance facility and T-hangar facility for 30 airplanes.

South Weymouth Naval Station, Avionics Maintenance Facility, MA. Design services for a maintenance facility that features shops, administrative areas and bridge cranes. The project includes shop support areas that are designed in a central core to permit efficient shop expansion in the future.

Mitchell Air Force Base, Milwaukee, WI. Structural design of a KC-10/KC-135 maintenance hangar for the Air National Guard.

Newark International Airport, United Airlines Hangar Renovation, Newark, NJ. Engineering and architectural services for improvements and upgrades to an existing hangar for useful life and lease extension. The project includes the painting of the hangar’s exterior and interior, a lighting upgrade, replacement of the heating system, window replacement, floor slab replacement, lunchroom renovation, plumbing replacement, new AFFF system, upgrade of the fire alarm system, and an elevator upgrade.

Atlantic City International Airport, Mid-Atlantic Air Station, Atlantic City, NJ. Preliminary and conceptual design for the consolidation and relocation of two existing air stations into one new 70,000-square-foot facility. The program includes two hangars, shops, maintenance facilities, offices, berthing, control operations and amenities.

John F. Kennedy International Airport, Air France Hangar, Queens, NY. Review of an expansion and upgrade to Hangar 16. The project consists of 160,000 square feet, including offices with ancillary support facilities and cargo receiving, handling and storage spaces.

Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin Hangar Evaluation, Tustin, CA. Structural / seismic evaluation of a 17-story-tall, 1,000-foot-long airship hangar. The hangar was designed to hold six blimps simultaneously.

Orange County Great Park, Hangar 296 Seismic Retrofit Feasibility Study, Irvine, CA. Seismic retrofit feasibility study for a 200,000-square-foot maintenance hangar constructed in the 1940s.

Page 40: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Dulles Jet Center Hangars Dulles, Virginia

Owner Landow & Company Architect

Giuliani Associates General Contractor Hensel Phelps Completion Date 2011 Construction Cost $20 million Total Area

169,200 sf

Thornton Tomasetti provided structural design of four identical 42,300-square-foot replacement hangars. Each steel-framed structure is 42 feet tall and spans 165 feet. The new hangars make use of existing pile-cap and pile foundations. The tilt-up hangar doors allow for weather protection.

Page 41: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Hamad International Airport Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Facility

Doha, Qatar

Owner Doha International Airport

Architect

Ghafari Associates

Contractor ADCC Joint Venture AKTOR Al Darwish Construzioni Cimolai Armando spa Cybarco

Construction Support Engineer

Incide

Completion Date 2011

Construction Cost

$1 billion

Total Area 1.3 million sf

Hamad International Airport was created to accommodate Qatar's aviation needs for the next 50 years and beyond. Thornton Tomasetti is serving as lead structural consultant to the design-build contractor, including providing peer review services, for a 1.3-million-square-foot aircraft maintenance hangar facility.

The hangar complex will function as the central maintenance hub for Qatar Airway's fleet. It is composed of two hangars, one with a 600-foot span and the other with a 725-foot span. The structures can accommodate eight wide body and four narrow body aircraft, including two A380s.

The design of the structure’s layout and column spacing ensures flexible aircraft parking and maximum maintenance efficiency. Mezzanine levels will allow direct access to the upper floors of aircraft. Floor-mounted docks for servicing the aircraft and overhead cranes will ease maintenance access and safety.

Page 42: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Memphis International Airport,

FedEx Airbus A380 Hangar Facility Memphis, Tennessee

Owner FedEx Corporation

Client / Architect Ghafari Associates, LLC

Contractor Hunt Construction

Completion Date 2009

Construction Cost Confidential

Total Area 300,000 sf

FedEx Corporation handles more than four million tons of cargo each year through Memphis International Airport. Thornton Tomasetti provided structural engineering services for a new mega hangar and multiple support buildings to accommodate the growing volume.

The FedEx Hangar Facility is the first of its kind in North America, and is designed as a base maintenance center for the world’s largest commercial aircraft. The project consists of several components including a parts warehouse; new shop space and offices; a security building; a ground service equipment maintenance building; and an aircraft maintenance hangar.

The 152,000-square-foot hangar is the most prominent structure within the facility. With a 400-foot-long main span, a 330-foot building depth, and an overall height of 150 feet with 100-foot clear-height, the hangar supports simultaneous maintenance for multiple wide-body and narrow-body aircraft.

A one-way roof-framing system was utilized to minimize primary truss member connection demands and simplify the fabrication and erection process of the structural steel. The main roof steel framing is designed to support numerous suspended overhead crane hoists and telescopic platforms, which are hung directly from the 400-foot-span roof trusses.

The project site is close to the New Madrid Fault zone, which required the structures to be designed and detailed to accommodate all requirements for Seismic Design Category D in accordance with the International Building Code, 2003 Edition. The project demanded structural continuity and ductility at the interface of the special concentrically braced frames and the deep foundation system. This was critical to ensure a robust overall structural system because of poor soil conditions that exist in the Memphis region. Concrete special moment frame foundations were utilized to ensure a ductile response to meet code prescribed seismic loading demands.

Page 43: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Presidential Helicopter Program Support Facility

Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland

Owner United States Navy

Architect HNTB/Giuliani Associates Architects, Inc.

Contractor Hensel Phelps Construction Company

Total Square Footage 202,000 sf

Completion Date 2006

Construction Cost $100 million

Thornton Tomasetti performed structural design and construction administration services for a design-build project to provide a new facility for the testing and evaluation of a new presidential helicopter fleet.

The 202,000-square-foot, high-bay, Type II hangar includes engineering, logistics, flight testing and evaluation, maintenance and program team administration spaces. The structure features long-span hangar bays, Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) rooms and design provisions for blast-resistance. The facility incorporated sustainable design elements and was constructed to the U.S. Green Building Council’s certification standards.

With an award-to-open schedule of just 15 months, the design phase was completed in only three months and the project was completed on time and on budget.

Page 44: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

McGuire Air Force Base, C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar

McGuire Air Force Base, New Jersey

Owner U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

General Contractor C. Pyramid Enterprises, Inc.

Construction Cost $26 million

Completion Date 2005

Sustainability SPiRiT Bronze

The United States Army Corps of Engineers retained Thornton Tomasetti to provide full in-house architectural and structural engineering services for the design-build of a 120,000-square-foot maintenance hangar. The building is designed to house the Boeing Globemaster C-17 aircraft, which is capable of transporting M-1 tanks, Chinook helicopters and other heavy construction equipment.

The outside perimeter of the hangar measures 400 feet by 300 feet and reaches a height of 100 feet. It can accommodate a single C-17 or K-10 aircraft in either tail-in or nose-in scenarios and is used for heavy maintenance. Various shop functions, including high-level security spaces, equipment storage, catwalks, and cranes, enable the facility to meet the needs of the intended mission. Particular attention was paid to the NDI shop which included two thick concrete walls for isolation purposes.

A SPiRiT (Sustainable Project Rating Tool) Bronze-level submission has been completed for this project.

Page 45: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Newark International Airport

Continental Airlines Maintenance Hangar

Newark, New Jersey

Owner PANYNJ Development

Completion Date 1998

Construction Cost $15 million

Total Area 75,000 sf

Thornton Tomasetti provided design services for a new 75,000-square-foot line maintenance hangar to house multiple Boeing 737 aircrafts; or a single DC-10; or a Boeing 747 aircraft. Project scope included a fire protection system, offices, shops and apron rehabilitation.

Thornton Tomasetti was responsible for the design of 400-z power requirements of the aircraft and the distribution through flush mounted pits. The hangar is classified as Group I and provides the following fire protection systems for a total discharge flow of 15,000 GPM: foam overhead deluge, sprinkler, foam monitors, spray column, and wet sprinklers. Plumbing design included two lift stations, an aircraft wash system, portable water system, compressed air, natural gas, fire alarm system for the aircraft, and under wing fire protection system.

Page 46: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Quantico Marine Corps Base, Greenside Hangar Complex

Quantico, Virginia Owner U.S. Marine Corps

Project Manager NAVFAC Washington

Design Manager R.W. Armstrong

Architect Rink Design Partnership

Contractor Archer Western Contractors Member of The Walsh Group

Steel Fabricator Postel Industries, Inc.

Completion Date

2011

Construction Cost $27.8 million

Total Area

64,000 sf

The 64,000-square-foot Greenside Hangar Complex consists of a Type II hangar space housing HMX-1 “Nighthawk” helicopters; an adjacent multi-story maintenance shop; and administrative, medical, storage and support areas. The design-build facility, which was designed to meet LEED Silver requirements, is composed of a structural steel frame, with a main span of more than 190 feet.

Thornton Tomasetti provided structural design services and construction support services for the multi-use military complex. In addition to engineer-of-record services, the project scope included the design of all connections, development of an integrated Tekla model, and production of steel shop drawings.

The design team overcame many challenges throughout the project. Poor soil conditions necessitated the use of Controlled Modulus Columns, which provided sufficient soil enhancement to support the structure on shallow foundations. During construction, the team was asked to revise the roof design and detailing to accommodate photovoltaic panels affixed over half the roof area. By working with Tekla, Thornton Tomasetti was able to include the modifications and issue updated steel shop drawings within one week of redesign approval. The combination of innovative construction support services, BIM capabilities and structural design enabled Thornton Tomasetti to facilitate efficient communication between the design and construction teams.

Page 47: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

McGuire Air Force Base, C-141 B Maintenance Hangars

McGuire Air Force Base, New Jersey

Owner U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Completion Date 1990

Construction Cost $15 million

Total Area Hangar One 45,000 sf Hangar Two 37,000 sf

Thornton Tomasetti provided structural engineering services for two new maintenance hangars– one measuring 45,000 square feet and the other 37,000 square feet – capable of accommodating C-141 B aircraft. The project scope included design of extensions for two existing hangar roof structures – modifications that expanded each hangar to 14,000 square feet – and design of sidewalls and doors to completely enclose the C-141 B aircraft.

Page 48: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Mitchell Air Force Base Hangar Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Owner Wisconsin Air National Guard

Completion Date 1994

Construction Cost $4 million

Thornton Tomasetti provided structural design of a hangar capable of accommodating KC-10 or KC-135 aircraft. Located at Mitchell Air Force Base, Milwaukee, the structure provides space for the Wisconsin Air National Guard. Services included the production of construction documents and full-time construction management.

Page 49: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Atlantic City International Airport Mid-Atlantic Air Station

Atlantic City International Airport, NJ

Owner/Contact U.S. Department of Transportation United States Coast Guard

Completion Date 1998

Construction Cost $12.3 million

Thornton Tomasetti provided structural engineering, through preliminary and conceptual design, for the consolidation and relocation of two existing Air Stations at Cape May, NJ and Brooklyn, NY into one new facility in Atlantic City. The program included two hangars, shops, maintenance facilities, offices, berthing, control operations and amenities. All new mechanical, electrical and HVAC systems, including an AFFF fire protection system, were part of the design.

As part of the early planning phase, preliminary and conceptual design reports were prepared. Three alternative site and building layouts were developed and evaluated to determine the final design and required construction funding.

Page 50: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Representative Airport Support Facility Experience

Hamad International Airport, Cargo Warehouse Facility Doha, QAT

O’Hare International Airport, FedEx Metroplex Chicago, IL

Newark Liberty International Airport International Air Cargo Center Buildings One and Two Newark, NJ

Cargo Facilities

Hamad International Airport, Cargo Warehouse Facility, Doha, QAT. Lead structural consultant to the design-build team for a one-story, 850,000-square-foot cargo warehouse facility. Scope includes peer review of the facility's structural design. A key project feature is a partial mezzanine that supports an automated warehouse storage and retrieval system.

O’Hare International Airport, Federal Express Cargo Relocation, Chicago, IL. Structural design of a 350,000-square-foot sort building that includes a 175,000-square-foot automated material handling system. The project consists of three support buildings for administration, vehicle and aircraft maintenance and a pedestrian bridge. All structures are constructed of steel framing and shallow foundations with either curtain wall or precast perimeter walls.

Newark Liberty International Airport International Air Cargo Center, Buildings One and Two, Newark, NJ. Design of two new air cargo facility buildings. Building One contains 196,000 square feet of multitenant warehouse space with 40,000 square feet of mezzanine office space. Building Two contains 78,500 square feet of multitenant warehouse space with 16,000 square feet of mezzanine office space. The project scope included sitework encompassing 24 acres. The project received the American Concrete Institute Honorable Mention Award.

San Francisco International Airport, North Field Cargo Facility, San Francisco, CA. Structural design for a 170,000-square-foot air freight cargo facility that includes aprons, hardstands sized for Boeing 747-400 aircraft and utility trenches.

John F. Kennedy International Airport, China Airlines Air Cargo Facility, Jamaica, NY. Structural design of an 83,000-square-foot cargo building containing a two-level ETV system and administrative office space. Scope included full-time construction services and design of site civil work for the site.

Philadelphia International Airport, United Airlines Air Cargo / GSE Facility, Philadelphia, PA. Design of a 31,000-square-foot cargo / GSE maintenance facility adjoining an existing American Airlines facility. Scope included cargo operations, which were reconfigured during the project; ground service equipment maintenance operations; new mezzanines; new office environments; a new building extension, with cool room; inbound storage; a battery room; and glycol station.

John F. Kennedy International Airport, Japan Airlines, Hangar 14, Queens, NY. Structural design for the rehabilitation of 573,000 square feet of office and cargo space and 360,000 square feet of new construction including a cargo addition with ETV and general aviation terminal.

Page 51: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Representative Airport Support Facility Experience

Page 2 of 2

John F. Kennedy International Airport, China Airlines Air Cargo Facility Jamaica, NY

O'Hare International Airport, City of Chicago Department of Aviation, Police Facility Chicago, IL

Newark Liberty International Airport, Fire Pump Station, North Cargo Area Newark, NJ

Logan International Airport, Storage Hangar, Boston, MA. Design of 15,000-square-foot storage hangar. Site work consisted of drainage, grading of a six-acre site, including apron pavement design and sanitary and water systems.

Anchorage Cargo Facility, Anchorage, AK. Structural design of taxiways, aprons and taxiway connections to runways.

Newark International Airport, EVA Airways Corporation, Newark, NJ. Structural design of a two-story building with 14,800 square feet of office space and a 1,000-square-foot entry lobby. The scope included designs for office operations, tenant fit-out and building modifications for future cargo equipment systems. The 4,800-square-foot cargo area consists of a container, handling system, a bypass line and rack storage area.

Dover Air Force Base, Air Freight Terminal and Outsized Cargo Facility, Dover, DE. Structural investigation of a pre-engineered air freight terminal building that suffered damage. Scope included review of deflections on rigid frames and deformations on the flanges at the top of columns and reviewing the field fixes required as engineered by the contractor’s engineer. Thornton Tomasetti was also retained to provide structural peer review services for the air freight terminal building and the adjacent outsized cargo facility.

Additional Support Facilities

San Diego International Airport, Rental Car Center (CONRAC), Tenant Improvements, San Diego, CA. Structural engineering for tenant improvement renovations to the existing CONRAC structure. The scope includes improvements to a 1,400-gross-square-foot “Gold Building” and a 250-gross-square-foot “Return Building,” foundations for a pre-engineered 100-gross-square-foot service booth, updating various sign foundations / support connections and modifications to the Quick Turn-Around (QTA) space. Construction is expected to consist of lightweight finishes over light-gage metal, structural steel framing for exterior walls and roof systems with the exception of QTA space being masonry construction.

O'Hare International Airport, City of Chicago Department of Aviation, Police Facility, Chicago, IL. Structural design of a proposed 32,740-square-foot, two-story police station with an adjoining garage and sally port.

Newark Liberty International Airport, Fire Pump Station, North Cargo Area, Newark, NJ. Structural design of a pump station that includes four diesel engine pumps, for 5,000 GPM at 150 psi each, and rehabilitation of an existing 500,000-gallon water tank.

San Francisco International Airport, Terminal One Air Traffic Control Tower, San Francisco, CA. Pre-design sustainability consulting for a new LEED-NC Gold air traffic control tower. The project scope included providing guidance on selection of sustainability strategies that could assure Gold certification and oversight of early energy simulations performed by others.

Page 52: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Hamad International Airport Cargo Warehouse Facility

Doha, Qatar

Owner Doha International Airport

Architect

Ghafari Associates

Contractor ADCC Joint Venture Aktor Al Darwish Construzioni Cimolai Armando spa Cybarco

Construction Support Engineer

Incide

Completion Date 2011

Construction Cost

$700 million

Total Area 850,000 sf

Photo courtesy of Ghafari

Thornton Tomasetti served as lead structural consultant to the design-build team for a one-story, 850,000-square-foot cargo warehouse facility at Hamad's new replacement airport. As part of its services, Thornton Tomasetti is performing a peer review of the facility's structural design.

A main feature of the cargo warehouse facility is a partial mezzanine to support an automated warehouse storage and retrieval system. Other components of the project are high-bay storage areas, work stations for make-up and breakdown of unit load devices (ULDs) and storage areas for special cargo.

The facility has the capacity to process 750,000 tons of cargo per year, making it one of the 20 largest cargo facilities in the world.

Page 53: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

O’Hare International Airport FedEx Cargo Relocation

Chicago, Illinois

Owner O’Hare Modernization Program

Client/Architect

Solomon Cordwell Buenz & Associates, Inc.

Contractor Power Construction

Completion Date 2011

Construction Cost $125 million

Total Area 343,000 sf

Thornton Tomasetti provided structural engineering services for the construction of a new cargo building and ancillary facilities to accommodate the relocation of existing FedEx Metroplex operations at O’Hare International Airport. The complex is designed to fulfill LEED Gold standards.

The 343,000-square-foot structural steel cargo building has a vegetated roof, includes a mezzanine for support functions, and contains a 175,000-square-foot automated material handling system. Support buildings include an administrative center, pedestrian bridge link, maintenance building, generator enclosure and guard kiosk facilities constructed of structural steel and supported on shallow foundations.

The exterior skin is curtain wall at the administrative center and pedestrian bridge, and precast at the cargo building and remaining buildings. The administrative center and pedestrian link feature architecturally exposed structural steel. A 544-linear-foot monorail system is included in the cargo building.

Page 54: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Newark Liberty International Airport International Air Cargo Center

Buildings One and Two Newark, New Jersey

Owner Port Authority of New York and New Jersey

Client Airis Development Corp.

Completion Date 1999

Construction Cost $35 million

Total Area 191,000 sf (Building 1) 78,500 sf (Building 2)

Award Honorable Mention Award, American Concrete Institute, 1998

The International Air Cargo Center (IACC) at Newark Liberty International Airport is designed with built-in flexibility to offer the type of warehouse and office space required to meet each individual carrier’s handling system and service standards. Building One is a 191,000-square-foot structure that includes 164,000 square feet of general warehouse area, 27,000 square feet of related office space and an elevated transport vehicular (ETV) material handling system. Building Two is composed of a 78,500-square-foot multitenant warehouse space with a 16,000-square-foot mezzanine office space. The IACC complex was planned and constructed using a design-build delivery method as a Class-A structure providing a 50-year service life. Consequently, the materials used will endure the rigors of prolonged use while providing initial and life-cycle economies. Thornton Tomasetti was retained to provide complete architectural and engineering services. Scope included site work encompassing 24 acres.

The cargo bay features a 6.5-inch-thick unreinforced concrete slab on grade and ground floor slabs that were placed using an alternating strip-cast method with “sof” sawed cut control joints. All concrete used for foundation pile caps, grade beams and slabs have a minimum compressive strength of 4,000 psi.

The building’s exterior is constructed with precast post-tensioned concrete wall panels providing two distinct designs – an understated horizontal banding for the air and land sides of the cargo house and an ornamental, modulated façade design for the office portions. The exterior wall design also provides the required vehicular impact criteria for the cargo house. The selection of the panelized concrete exterior wall was a critical factor in maintaining durability and flexibility as well as minimizing the construction schedule for the fast-track project.

Page 55: TT_AviationBrochure_2015

Philadelphia International Airport, United Airlines Cargo Facility

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Owner United Airlines

Completion Date 2000

Construction Cost $4 million

Total Area 31,000 sf

Structural design of a 31,000-square-foot cargo / GSE maintenance facility addition on 2.2 acres adjoining an existing American Airlines facility. The expansion included the reconfiguration of cargo operations and ground service equipment maintenance operations and the design of new mezzanines, new office environments and a new building extension including cool room, inbound storage, battery room and glycol station.

The construction of the facility was coordinated with the existing adjacent American Airlines facility. The building maximizes common vehicular parking, truck access and control requirements.