TSX.V: GOM Frankfurt Xetra: 3G8A · Overview 2 Endeavoring to become a gold producing company in...
Transcript of TSX.V: GOM Frankfurt Xetra: 3G8A · Overview 2 Endeavoring to become a gold producing company in...
1July 2017
TSX.V: GOM Frankfurt Xetra: 3G8A
Creating Shareholder ValueThrough Acquisitions and Development
Creating Shareholder ValueThrough Acquisitions and Development
Greenwood Precious Metals ProjectGreenwood Precious Metals Project
Overview
2
Endeavoring to become a gold producing company in 2017. 100% ownership of 3 mines & mill located in the prolific Greenwood mining camp of British Columbia
1. Lexington‐Grenoble mine2. Golden Crown mine3. May Mac Mine4. Greenwood mill
A positive 2017 PEA for Lexington & Golden Crown mines
Fast‐tracking the projects towards production by re‐activating the mines.
Further growth through acquisitions
October 2016: Acquires Kettle River Resources Ltd, which holds 100% interest in 54 mineral claims and 75 crown grants encompassing approximately 10,400 hectares.• Phoenix Property, including historic Phoenix mine which produced
over 1M oz Gold and over 500M lbs. copper• Over 30 past producing mines, deposits and exploration targets• With purchase Golden Dawn becomes one of the largest land owners in Greenwood mining camp
second only to Kinross Gold, the 5th largest gold producer in the world.
June 2017: LOI to acquire past producing Lone Star mine adjacent to Lexington mine.
3
Location Maps
Project
Washington StateBritish Columbia
British Columbia
United States
4
Greenwood Precious Metals PropertiesGreenwood Precious Metals Properties
5
Lexington Mine1
Lexington property : 2,060 hectares. Developed as an underground copper‐gold mine. Production for 9 months in 2009 of 5,418 ounces gold, 3,196 ounces silver and 861,281 pounds of copper.
Lexington Area Historic Production
No. 7
City of Paris
Lonestar
6
2016 Lexington‐Grenoble Deposit Updated Mineral Resource Estimate
Lexington‐Grenoble Mine1
*see note 1
Permits for operating the Lexington‐Grenoble mine were received from the BC Ministry of Energy and Mines on June 16.The Company is now in a position to commence to dewater and re‐activate the Lexington mine
Mine production from the Lexington‐Grenoble depositwill be planned as outlined in an updated Preliminary Economic Analysis report(as announced June 19th, 2017).
May Mac Mine
7
Excellent infrastructure with power and water available at mine site
Historic production from 1903 to 1983 is reported to be in the range of 4,228 tonnes averaging 5.35g/t Au, 227 g/t Ag yielding 767 ounces of gold, 30,829 ounces of silver.
Inactive since the 1980s, 2 principal gold, silver, and base metals veins
2
8
Surface drilling has commenced with the objective of exploring the strike extension of the known zones.
An exploration target has been projected based on the assumed extent of the vein and proportion mineralized. The exploration target is: 150,000 to 250,000 tonnes with a grade range of 100‐200 g/t Ag, 1‐2 g/t Au, 1‐2% Pb and 12% Zn.
The Company is awaiting approval to extend the No.7 adit (yellow) and is permitting a bulk sample to be processedat its Greenwood Mill located only 15kms from mine.
The potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature; there has been insufficient exploration to define a Mineral Resource and that it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the targets being delineated as a Mineral Resource.
May Mac Mine2
Golden Crown Mine
9
Golden Dawn is waiting on permit approval for surface diamond drilling (up to 10,000 m) at the Golden Crown Property with the aim to expand resources.After which a permit application to mine a 10,000 tonne bulk sample from the Golden Crown Mine will be made.
June 2, 2017 PEA indicates that the Golden Crown Mine could produce 72,000 tonnes per year, and be processed through the existing Greenwood Mill and Tailings Facility.
3
10
Portal
2016 Golden Crown Deposit Updated Mineral Resource Estimate
The Company submitted a permit application for diamond surface drilling starting in Q3 2017 . The purpose of the drilling is to infill between existing holes and to explore extensions. In the 3rd Quarter of 2017 the company will submit permit applications to refurbish the Golden Crown adit, conduct underground exploration, with a view to start trial mining in the 2nd Quarter of 2018
Golden Crown Mine3
*see note 1
11
The Greenwood Mill4
Mineral processing of the May Mac, Lexington and Golden Crown mill feed can be performed at the existing Greenwood Mill and concentrator facility.
The existing processing facility consists of a concentrating plant and related equipment, including infrastructure and a tailing storage facility (TSF).
The was built in 2007 and was operated between April and December 2008 in part due to the recession.
200‐400 tpd design capacity400,000 tonnes design
tailings facility
Permits for operating the Greenwood Process Plant were received from the BC Ministry of Energy and Mines on June 16.
12
Floatation Cells
The major processing equipment consists of a ball mill, flotation cells, thickeners and a filter and concentrate / tailing handling systems.
Grinding is performed by ball milling, with a split of the primary mill recycle delivered to a gravity recovery circuit. Ball mill cyclone overflow is sent to froth flotation to produce a copper ‐ gold concentrate for sale.
Ball Mill
The Greenwood Mill4
13
Mineral processing of the May Mac, Lexington and Golden Crown mill feedcan be performed at the GOM’s centrally located Greenwood Mill facility
June 2, 2017 Preliminary Economic Assessment Highlights
14
• Base case pre‐tax IRR of 118.4% and NPV (6% discount rate) of C$27.4M (after‐tax IRR of 103.4% and NPV of C$19.7M) Pre‐production capital requirements of C$3.4M
• Pre‐production period of six months as a result of existing infrastructure and permits from the acquisition of the processing plant and Lexington‐Grenoble and Golden Crown Mines
• Life of mine ("LOM") cash cost of US$604 per ounce gold and all‐in sustaining costs of US$786 per ounce gold
• Preliminary Economic Assessment (the "PEA") uses the updated Mineral Resource Estimates announced April 6, 2016.
• Exploration Targets for increasing Mineral Resources at both Lexington and Golden Crown Mines
• Exploration Target for further mill feed from the company’s 100% owned May Mac Mine 15 km by road access from Greenwood Mill.
• Several proximal satellite deposits too small to warrant stand‐alone processing facilities are targets for exploration and may further increase processing plant feed.
Lexington‐Grenoble Property & Deposit, Golden Crown Property & Deposit
*Note 2
15
Phoenix PropertyPotential for Long Term Sustainability
By acquiring Kettle River Resources along with its properties containing over 30 past producing mines and the Tremblay tailings, Golden Dawn has secured access to several high potential exploration targets. Utilizing modern exploration technologies such as high resolution airborne geophysics, the company is exploring for possible deeper seated “feeder systems” which may underlie the mineralization at the numerous historic surface mines. Owning a mill within 15kms of all the historic mines is key to the potential success in the area.
16
Twenty‐nine past producing mines and well over 70 Mineral showings occur on the Phoenix Property
The company is currently re‐processing a very large database of historical exploration data acquired over the past 100 years.“Data Mining” has become a key component in re‐exploring the numerous past producing mines and identifying new exploration targets.
Property Model Commodity (Tonnes) Property Model Commodity (Tonnes)Phoenix Skarn Cu‐Au‐Ag 21,552,283 Bluebell Skarn Cu‐Au‐Ag 353Curlew Skarn Cu‐Au‐Ag Part of Phoenix Goldfinch Poly Vein Ag‐Pb‐Zn+‐Au 299Monarch Skarn Cu‐Au‐Ag Part of Phoenix Keno Vein Ag‐Au‐Cu‐Pb‐Zn 294
Old Ironsides Skarn Cu‐Au‐Ag Part of Phoenix R.Bell Skarn/Vein Cu‐Ag‐Au 287Victoria Skarn Cu‐Au‐Ag Part of Phoenix Cyclops Skarn(strat) Zn‐Pb‐Ag‐Cu 259War Eagle Skarn Fe‐Cu Part of Phoenix Crescent Vein Meso Ag‐Pb‐Zn+‐Au 250Aetna Skarn Cu‐Au‐Ag Part of Phoenix Mavis Vein Ag‐Au 29
Rawhide Skarn Cu‐Au‐Ag 855,634 Bonanza Massive(repl) Pb‐Zn‐Ag‐Au‐Cu 25Snowshoe Skarn Cu‐Au‐Ag 545,129 Prince Henry Vein Ag‐Au‐Pb‐Zn 19Brooklyn Skarn Ag‐Au‐Cu 292,834 Gold Drop Skarn Cu‐Au 12Emma Skarn Cu‐Au‐Ag‐Gr‐Mo‐Co 241,538 Fanny Joe Skarn/Vein Ag‐Pb‐Zn‐Cu‐Mn N/A
Oro Denoro Skarn Cu‐Au‐Ag‐Co 123,782 Gilt Edge Skarn Cu N/AStemwinder Skarn Cu‐Au 105,336 Lake Poly Vein Ag‐Pb‐Zn+‐Au N/AB.C. Mine Skarn Cu‐Au‐Ag 93,874 May Alice Skarn Cu N/AGrey Eagle Skarn Fe‐Cu 45,360 Pac Vein Au N/ASkylark Poly Vein Ag‐Pb‐Zn+‐Au 38,761 Rathmullen Vein Cu‐Ag‐Au‐Zn N/A
Last Chance Vein Au‐Ag‐Pb‐Zn 704 Stan Skarn Cu‐Mo N/ABay Poly Vein Ag‐Pb‐Zn+‐Au 447 Sylvester K Skarn(hornfels) Au N/A
Marshall Skarn Au‐Cu‐Pb,Zn 370 Tokyo Vein Cu‐Ag‐Au‐Zn N/AYellow Jacket Skarn Cu‐Au N/A
Phoenix PropertyPotential for Long Term Sustainability
Historic ProductionHistoric Production
17
Potential for Long Term SustainabilityPhoenix Mine Cluster5
Greenwood Mill
Total production at Phoenix during the period 1900 ‐ 1976 is reported at 27 million tonnes at a grade of 0.9% Cu and 1.12 g/t Au, from a number of different ore bodies. This amounts to over 1 million ounces of gold production from the Phoenix deposit.
A planned high resolution airborne geophysical survey will significantly assist in identifying any correlation between the cluster of mines and possible deep feeder mineralized systems.
Tremblay Tailings
18
Potential for Long Term SustainabilityPhoenix Mine Cluster5
700m
400m
View of the Phoenix Mine Open Pit
Aerial view
Total production at Phoenix during the period 1900 ‐ 1976 is reported at 27 million tonnes at a grade of 0.9% Cu and 1.12 g/t Au, from a number of different ore bodies. This amounts to over 1 million ounces of gold production from the Phoenix deposit.
19
Potential for Long Term SustainabilityPhoenix Mine Cluster – Sylvester K5
7 channel samples were taken by Golden Dawn from the Sylvester “K” mine Of these, the latter 6 samples were collected in a continuous line across the width of the massive sulphide zone and footwall quartz‐pyrite veinlet stockwork (network). The average grade of this line of samples is 9.92 g/t gold over a true width of 15.2 metres.
Sylvester K Sylvester K TrenchSylvester K TrenchSylvester K Trench
Based on drill holes that penetrate along a 150 m sulphide zone, trenching that has exposed the zone between 150 m and 230 m long, a vertical depth of 30 m (from drilling it is interpreted faulting cut‐off the zone at this depth) and a bulk density of 3.5 t/m3, the Sylvester K exploration target is estimated at: 150,000 ‐ 250,000 tonnes with a grade range of 6‐8 g/t Au.
The potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature; there has been insufficient exploration to define a Mineral Resource and that it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the targets being delineated as a Mineral Resource.
20
Potential for Long Term SustainabilityPhoenix Mine Cluster – Snowshoe Mine5
One of several past producing mines in the Phoenix mine area the Showshoemined 545,129 tonnes from 1900‐11, producing 45,292 ozs Gold, 174,604 ozs Silver & 13.9M lbs Copper
Snowshoe Pit
Snowshoe Pit
Snowshoe
21
Potential for Long Term SustainabilityPhoenix Mine Cluster – Rawhide Mine5
One of several past producing mines in the Phoenix mine area the Rawhide mine where 855,634 tonnes were mined from 1904‐16, producing 37,238 ozs Gold, 243,725 ozs Silver & 18.6M lbs Copper
Plan of underground workings inRawhide, Showshoe mines area
Rawhide Mine
22
Potential for Long Term SustainabilityNE Cluster6
A planned high resolution airborne geophysical survey will assist in identifying any correlation between the cluster of mines and possible deep feeder mineralized systems.
Historic Production
“The mines within the NE area which in early years provided the major production are all found to located along or within a short distance of the contact of limestone and overlying greenstones and volcanics. Fracturing in both N.E. and N.W. patterns has undoubtedly aided mineralizing solutions and is responsible for many of the heavier concentrations of suplhide minerals.The search for new mineralized bodies and for the extension of known mineralized bodies should therefore be concentrated along the limestone contacts with particular interest being given to the areas where skarn rock is in evidence. Diamond drilling on the Oro Denoro has already proven that the skarn zone and the copper mineralization extend to a depth of over 800 ft. (243m) and it therefore possible to find major ore zones in depth.” Report on Emma Crown Grant Claim by H.D. Foreman, P.Eng March 14, 1968
23
Potential for Long Term SustainabilityNE Cluster – Oro Denoro Mine6
NE Area
~300m
Production at Oro Denoro (1903‐1917): 136,000 tons @ 1.37% Cu, 0.03 oz/t Au, 0.23 oz/t Ag
Open Pit Mining Area
Open Pit Mining Area
24
Potential for Long Term SustainabilityNE Cluster – Emma Mine6
Emma Mine Workings~300m
The Emma mine is situated to the north of the Oro Denoro mine and is situated on the northern portion of a large skarn zone in which the Oro Denoro mine occurs.
Emma Mine Workings
Oro Denoro Mine
25
Potential for Long Term SustainabilityNE Cluster – Emma Mine6
Underground workings
~300m
Historic Emma Mine Plan
Historic Emma MineSection View
Historic production in the period 1901 to 1927, totalled 254,597 tonnes containing 6,804 ozs gold, 78,065 ozs silver and 5,132,118 lbsof copper. (Minfile 082ESE062)
26
Potential for Long Term SustainabilityTremblay Tailings
“From the commencement of Phoenix milling operations in 1959 to 1977, a total of 4,569,300 tons of tailing was deposited into the Tremblay tailings pond. “1Assuming the historical production information is correct regarding quantities, averaged grade and ranges of recoveries, the following is an exploration target for Tremblay Tailings: 3.8 ‐ 4.2 million tonnes grading 0.2 ‐ 0.3 g/t Au and 0.05 ‐ 0.1 % Cu.
The potential quantity and grade of this exploration targets is conceptual innature; there has been insufficient exploration to define a Mineral Resource andthat it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the targets being delineatedas a Mineral Resource.Based on preliminary investigations, a recovery operation using regrinding and flotation to produce a gold sulphide concentrate warrants further metallurgical testing.
7
Tailings Constraining Dike
Greenwood Mill
Tremblay Tailings
~570m“The raw tailings was passed through hydrocyclones and the underflow, carrying the coarser, heavier fraction was used to construct the retaining dike. The finer, lighter fraction was deposit behind the dike. In theory the dike would therefore contain a large proportion of the sulphides and free gold which was present in the raw tailing.” 1
1 January 25, 1990 Report by G.B. Hardwicke, P.Eng., Manager of the Phoenix mine from 1971‐78, for Kettle River Resources
27
Potential for Long Term SustainabilityLone Star Mine8
June 2017: LOI to acquire past producing Lone Star mine adjacent to Lexington Mine
Grand ForksBritish ColumbiaWashington State
28
Potential for Long Term SustainabilityLone Star Mine8
Lone Star Open Pit
Paul Cowley P.Geo consulting geologist (left) andDr. Mathew Ball, Ph.D, P.Geo COO
inspect the Lone Star Mine
29
Potential for Long Term SustainabilityLone Star Mine8
Lone StarOpen Pit
15kms toGreenwood Mill
There is potential for additional resources at Lone Star as many zones in the deposit remain open and untested to fully define their extent. A $550,000 exploration program is recommended for diamond drilling in order to potentially expand the resources on the south and eastern sectors of the property.Lone Star deposit is located only 17kms south of the Greenwood Mill.
1910‐18: 145,000 tonnes grading 1.25% Cu, 0.036 opt Au and 0.2 opt Ag were shipped from Lone Star1977‐78: Granby Mining Co. open pitted the Lone Star property, trucking about400,000 tons to Phoenix mine in the final months of the Phoenix mining operations.
Historic Production
Historic See Note 3
See Note 1
30
Tam O’Shanter9
Tam O’Shanter
Greenwood
DeadwoodDeposit
Drill Holes
Historically, 50 drill holes have been drilled on the Tam O’Shanter Property mostly to test the Deadwood Zone. The drilling defines the Deadwood Zone over a strike length of approximately 500m and to a depth 400m. The Deadwood Gold Zone has now been extended to depth and along strike to the northwest and southeast but remains open along all directions.Utilizing a strike length of 500m, depth of 400m, width of 40m, bulk density of 2.8 and a 50% drilling success ratio, an exploration target for Tam O'Shanter is estimated between 10 to 12 million tonnes at a gold grade between 0.5 to 0.7 g/t
The potential quantity and grade of this exploration target is conceptual in nature; there has been insufficient exploration to define a Mineral Resource and that it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the targets being delineated as a Mineral Resource.
The Bengal Zone is a large area of epithermal alteration and is a target for future exploration.
BengalZone
See Note 1
31
Cautionary Notes
32
Cautionary Notes
Note 1: Current Mineral Resource Estimates disclosed in "Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment on the Greenwood Precious Metals Project, Greenwood, British Columbia, Canada", P&E Mining Consultants Inc. Signing Date June 2, 2017.
(1)Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, or other relevant issues. It is noted that no specific issues have been identified as yet.
(2)The Inferred Mineral Resource in this estimate has a lower level of confidence that that applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of the Inferred Mineral Resource could be upgraded to an Indicated Mineral Resource with continued exploration.
(3)The mineral resources in this report were estimated using the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by the CIM Council.
(4)The 3.5 g/t AuEq underground Mineral Resource cut‐off grade for Lexington and Golden Crown were derived from the approximate Apr 30/17 two year trailing average Au price of US$1,200/oz and Cu price of US$2.50/lb, US$/C$ exchange rate of 0.80, 90% & 85% respective Au and Cu process recoveries, C$35/t process cost, C$75/t mining cost and C$30/t G&A cost. AuEq g/t = Au g/t + (Cu% x 1.5)
(5)The 0.4 g/t Au open pit Mineral Resource cut‐off grade for Deadwood was derived from the approximate Apr 30/17 two year trailing average Au price of US$1,200/oz US$/C$ exchange rate of 0.80, 90% Au process recovery, C$13/t process cost, C$3/topen pit mining cost and C$5/t G&A cost.
Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio‐political, marketing, or other relevant issues. The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Mineral Resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Mineral Resources as an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource category.
33
Cautionary Notes
Note 2:
Economic analysis disclosed in "Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment on the Greenwood Precious Metals Project,
Greenwood, British Columbia, Canada", P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Signing Date June 2, 2017.
"This Preliminary Economic Assessment is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are
considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be
categorized as Mineral Reserves. The Inferred Mineral Resource in this estimate has a lower level of confidence that that
applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the
majority of the Inferred Mineral Resource could be upgraded to an Indicated Mineral Resource with continued exploration. It
is uncertain that the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources will be converted to the Proven or Probable Mineral
Reserves. There is no certainty that this Preliminary Economic Assessment will be realized. Mineral Resources that are not
Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability; the estimate of Mineral Resources in this Preliminary
Economic Assessment may be materially affected by higher operating costs, lower metal prices, lower process recoveries,
environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio‐political, marketing, or other relevant issues."
34
Cautionary Notes
Note 3:Historical Lone Star Mineral Resource Estimate as disclosed in Golden Dawn News Release dated June 2, 2017.A qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historic estimate as current mineral resources or mineralreserves. As such the issuer, Golden Dawn, is not treating this historical estimate as a current mineral resources or mineralreserves.
(P&E Mining Consultants Inc.; effective date 23 September, 2007):
(1)Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineralresources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, or otherrelevant issues.
(2)The quantity and grade of reported inferred resources in this estimation are conceptual in nature.
(3)The mineral resources in this estimate were calculated using the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum(CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines prepared by the CIM StandingCommittee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIM Council December 11, 2005.
(4)Gold equivalent grade (Au Eq) was calculated using a gold price of US$593/oz and copper price of US$2.84/lb., based onthe 24 month (at July 31, 2007) trailing average of gold and copper prices, to obtain a conversion factor of % copper x 3.284 +gold g/t = Au Eq g/t. Metallurgical recoveries and smelting/refining costs were not factored into the gold equivalentcalculation.
(5)The Cu equivalent cut‐off value of 1.5% was calculated and rounded utilizing the following: Cu price US$2.84/lb, $USexchange rate $0.88, process recovery $95%, smelter payable 95%, smelting and refining charges C$7/tonnemined, miningcost C$62/tonne mined, process cost $C28/tonne processed, G&A cost $7.50/tonne processed.
Capital Structure & Financials
Market Cap
Issued Shares
~ $30M
107,486,170
35
Management
36
Mr. Wolf Wiese ‐ President & CEOMr. Wiese has been involved in the conception and implementation of local and international businesses for the past 30 years including 16 years in the Mining Exploration Business as a consultant and financier to public companies. Driving force behind Canadian Metals Explorations Ltd, now Hard Creek Nickel Ltd. from 1995 until 2004. During his tenure Canadian Metals Explorations Ltd. discovered one of the largest Sulfide Nickel deposits in the World. Mr. Wiese created Golden Dawn Minerals Inc. in 2004.
Mr. Stephen M. Leahy – DirectorMr. Leahy has been involved in the resource sector since 1982. He was the founder of North American Tungsten and its Chairman& CEO from 1993‐2013. With 250 employees and CDN $100 Million in revenue, North American Tungsten produced annually some 4% of the world’s primary tungsten concentrate from its extensive underground operations. From 2011‐2013 Mr. Leahy was president of International Tungsten Industry Association based in London. He is a member of the ITIA Executive Committee for eight years and a member of ITIA itself since 1993. He is a director of Mining Association of Canada from 2011‐2013 and a founding member of the Yukon Mine Training Association. In addition, Mr. Leahy serves as a director for four separate junior mining companies.
Mr. Puil is an asset manager with more than 20 years’ experience managing investments.Kevin is currently Managing Partner at RIVI Capital LLC, a mining focused private equity firm based in San Francisco. Prior to that, he held senior positions at several firms including Senior Analyst at the Encompass Fund in San Francisco, and at Bolder Investment Partners in Vancouver (now Haywood Securities), where he was a Partner and Portfolio Manager.Kevin currently serves as a Director and member of the Audit Committee of three Toronto Stock Exchange companies. He holds a degree in Economics from the University of Victoria in British Columbia, and is a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) charter holder.
Mr. Kevin Puil – Director
Management – cont’d
37
Mr. Brown previously spent 4 years working in corporate finance and has over 6 years’ experience working in the public markets. Mr. Brown has completed his CSC and is also fluent in Portuguese.
Andrew Brown, Corporate Secretary
Ms. Andrea Yuan, CPA, CGA ‐ CFOMs. Andrea Yuan Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA)/Certified General Accountant (CGA) British Columbia and Certified Public Accountant (CPA) New Hampshire. Ms. Yuan obtained her Bachelor of Economics from Shanghai University of Finance and Economics in 1994. Ms. Yuan started as internal auditor then team head internal audit department at the Bank of China’s Shanghai Pudong branch China 1994 through to 1999. Ms. Yuan moved to Davidson and Company LLP, Chartered Accountants, in 2004 audit group. November 2006 until 2009, Ms. Yuan was audit manager at Davidson. From 2009 until October 2011, Ms. Yuan was audit principal at Davidson. Ms. Yuan is Chief Financial Officer or financial consultant for several public companies TSX Venture Exchange, Canadian Securities Exchange and OTC Markets.
Dr. Mathew Ball, Ph.D, P.Geo. – COO & Chief GeologistDr. Ball is a geologist with over 30 years of worldwide experience including underground precious metals mine development programs. For the 5 years he was President and COO Bralorne gold mine B.C. Dr. Ball brings a wealth of practical experience in lode and epithermal gold‐silver, porphyry copper‐gold and related skarn deposits, all of which occur in the Greenwood area.
Directors & Advisors
Dr. Dieter Benz, Ph.D. Mechanical Eng.
Stefan Bender, Former Chief editor of German information service “The Mining Scout”
Non‐Executive Directors
Advisory Board
Stewart Jackson, Ph.D. & P. Geo.
Michael Dufresne, M.Sc. & P. Geo.
Frank Wright, P.Eng. (Processing Engineer)
George Sookochoff, B.Comm. (Database Specialist)
38
Technical Authors
39
Preliminary Economic Analysis (PEA) P&E Mining Consultants Inc., established in 2004, provides geological and mine
engineering consulting reports, resource estimate technical reports, Preliminary Economic Assessments and Pre‐Feasibility Studies. Affiliated with major Toronto based consulting firms for the purposes of joint venturing on Feasibility Studies. Experience covers over 250 technical reports on diamonds, most metallic deposits including gold, silver, base metals, PGM and iron for both open pit and underground deposits. Staff and associates have experience in geological interpretation, 3D geologic modeling, technical report writing, resource and reserve estimates, property evaluations, mine design, production scheduling, operating and capital cost estimates and metallurgical engineering. P&E Mining Consultants Inc. operates under Certificates of Authorization from the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario and Professional Engineers Ontario.
Except for historical information contained herein, this presentation may contain forward‐looking statements
including, but not limited to, comments regarding predictions and projections. Forward‐looking statements
address future events and conditions and therefore involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Although Golden
Dawn Minerals, Inc. believe that such expectations are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such
expectations will prove to be correct, and therefore actual results may differ materially from those currently
anticipated in such statements. You are cautioned not to place reliance on such forward‐looking statements,
whether made in this presentation or in any question and answer period related to this presentation.
This document has been approved by Dr. Mathew Ball, P.Geo. Chief Operating Officer for the Company, who
is a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43‐101.
Forward Looking Statements
40
41
TSX.V: GOMFrankfurt Xetra: 3G8A
#318 – 1199 W. Pender StreetVancouver, B.C. Canada
Tel: 604‐221‐[email protected]
www.goldendawnminerals.com
Creating Shareholder ValueThrough Acquisitions and Development