Tropical Fruit Genomes and Postharvest Technology General ...
Transcript of Tropical Fruit Genomes and Postharvest Technology General ...
7/15/2009
1
Postharvest Technology andPostharvest Technology and Tropical Fruit Genomes
Robert E. Paull, Nancy J. Chen, Helen Turano, Beth Irikura and Pingfang Wug g
Department of Tropical Plant & Soil SciencesUniversity of Hawaii at Manoa
Postharvest Deals withFresh Fruit, Vegetables and OrnamentalsSteps from harvest to consumerReduction in losses – quantity and qualityEnsuring consistency of supply
Volume & quality
QualityAppearance – suitability for the marketNutritional ValueSafety - Microbial
7/15/2009
2
General Characteristics of Fresh Fruit, Vegetables & Flowers
Living TissueHigh Water ContentSubject to PathogensDiverse - Morphological Structurep g
- Composition- Physiology
Potential for contamination
Postharvest Supply Chain- Components
Grower
Packer
Transport
Distributor
Money &
Information
Marketer
Consumer
Value
7/15/2009
3
Postharvest Research and Biological Scales
7/15/2009
4
Genome Sequencing Goals Reconcile molecular biology and genes with function and phenotypeArabidopsis is the reference genome
BenefitsComparative sequencing – plant genome p q g p gstructure, dynamics & plant evolutionIdentification of genes and other functional elements (regulatory genes, small RNAs)Tool for gene isolation from new target species
Genome Sequencing CostsYear Human Genome2003 $ 300 M
2007 $ 1 M
2008 $ 60,000
2010 $ 5,000
454 Sequencing– One Run – 500 Mb up to 600 b long - cost $12,000
Data Generated- Raw Sequences - Tetra/Giga bytes- Text Sequences - Giga/Mega bytes- Quality File - Mega/Kilo bytes
7/15/2009
5
Plant GenomesSpecies Genome Size Genome Completed
Arabidopsis thaliana 125 Mb 2000
Poplar 430 Mb 2006
Grape 505 Mb 2007 December
Papaya 373 Mb 2008 April
Peach 280 Mb Started 2008
Apple 753 Mb 2009
St a be (F esca) 206 Mb In p og essStrawberry (F. vesca) 206 Mb In progress
Tomato 950 Mb 2010
Citrus – Sweet Orange 382 Mb 2010 (1.2x)
Banana (M. acuminata) 610 Mb 2011
Maize ~ 2,300 Mb
Tropical fruit
Papaya as a Model Systemp
A small genome of 372 MbDiploid inheritance (2n=18)Fully sequenced genome (6X)ESTs 77,246 in GenbankESTs 77,246 in GenbankTransformation system availableSets fruit all year around
7/15/2009
6
Phylogeneticrelationships between
species with completedspecies with completed genome sequencing
projects (bold) or those ongoing.
Barbazuk W. B. et.al. Genome Res.;2008;18:1381-1392
Genome Duplication and Evolution
Papaya lineage diverged from Arabidopsis about 72MYAp y g g p
Lyons et al. 2008 Tropical Plant Biol. 1:181-190. Tang et al. 2008 Genome Res. 18:1944-1954.Ming et al. 2008 Nature 452:991-996.
7/15/2009
7
Genomes – Steps & Approaches 1. Sequencing1. Sequencing
BAC by BAC – Hierarchical - ~120 kb Whole Shotgun 1 to 3 kb
2. Gene Structure Prediction3. Gene Functional Prediction – Annotation4. Gene to Phenotype (phenome) – Function
Greatest complexityApproaches • Genetics• Physiological• Phenotype
Reverse geneticsQTL mappingCloning and taggingComparative mapping
Mapping & GenomesGenetic Classical linkage mapGenetic Classical linkage map
Recombination of genes relative to each other
Physical Location on DNARestriction site, nucleotide sequence, genes,
regardless of inheritance
Cytogenetic Location of markers on chromosome
Genes Assigning DNA seq. to chromosomes
Gene Structure Single gene – introns, exons, untranslated regions, termination and regulatory elements
7/15/2009
8
Approaches to Sequencing
enet
ics
2: 5
73G
reen
200
1 N
atur
e Rev
Ge
Whole Genome Sequencing
Green 2001 Nature Rev Genetics 2: 573
7/15/2009
9
Papaya initially had 9 major & 3 minor
Genetic mapping
Papaya initially had 9 major & 3 minor linkage groups (LGs)
Based upon 706 WGS (Whole Genome Seq.) and BES (BAC end seq.) microsatellite markers
Linkage GroupsLGs 8 and 10 are on the same chromosome
Based on assembled supercontigs.LGs 9 and 11 same chromosome
Based on florescent in situ hybridization (FISH)LGs 7 and 12 same chromosome based on FISH
Cytogenetic Mapping LG 7 + LG 12 LG 9 + LG 10
Physical assignment of papaya linkage groups to chromosomes by fluorescence in situ
hybridization (FISH)DNA markers from three minor LGs and hybridized withchromosome-specific markers to observe the co-localization ofsignals on metaphase chromosomes. Ching Man Wai
7/15/2009
10
Assembled papaya genome
Linkage Group
Assembled
SSR Markers
Assembled genome (purple bars) anchored to the 12 papaya linkage groups (red bars) through SSR markers (blue lines).
Assembled Genome
Gene PredictionCpETR1 - Ethylene Receptor - EVM 151.32
<>
7/15/2009
11
Genome Statistics Sequenced Fruit Genomes
Arabidopsis Papaya Grape Tomato PeachSize (Mbp) 140 372 487 950 280
Chromosomes 5 9 19 12 8G+C content total(%) 35 35.3 36.2 36.1
Gene number 31,114 24,746 30,434 ~40,000 ~24,129
AAverage gene length (bp/gene) 2,232 2,373 3,399Average intronlength (bp) 165 501 1502
Transposons (%) 10 52 41.4
Papaya Gene Statistics
Genome Papaya Relative ToPapaya Gene Content 24,746 genes
Arabidopsis < 10 to 20%
Rice < 34%
Poplar < 46%
Grape < 19%
7/15/2009
12
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3505
10152025303540
evm no.
Average number of predicted genes per40
4550556065707580859095
100105110115120125130135140145
posi
tion
p g p100kb on papaya chromosome 1
145150155160165170175180185190195200205210215220225230
Functional Categories of Genes on Linkage Group 1 = Chromosome 1
Cellular communication2.8%
Protein fate
Cell type differentiation0.7%
Protein fate9.8%
Cellular transport5.6%
Development2.8%
Energy1.4%
Organ differentiation0.7%
Metabolism18.2%
Unclassified 7 7%
Cell fate1.4%
Cell cycle and DNA processing0.7%
Systemic interaction with the environment
1.4%
Tissue differentiation0.7%
Transcription1.4%
Transport facilities and transport routes
5.6%
Subcellular localization22.4%
Regulation of metabolism and protein function
0.7%
Protein with binding function16.1%
7.7%
7/15/2009
13
Papaya Ethylene Receptors
Paull et al., Tropical Plant Biology 1, 246-277
Papaya MicroarrayCustom papaya microarray (Version 1)Th (4 72k) h 24 421 di dThe arrays (4x72k) have 24,421 predicted genesEach gene represented by two to three probes
Probed Microarray with RNAExtracted RNA from mature green and ~30% ripeg p16,375 genes were detected above background976 genes were up-regulated by at least 3-fold857 genes were down-regulated by at least 3-fold
7/15/2009
14
Mature Green and 30% Ripe Microarrays
Gene Expression During RipeningCellulose synthase was highly expressed in green fruit and decreased 8-fold at 30% ripe stageIn the 30% ripe fruit cell-wall genes that increased
4x polygalacturonases, 3x pectinesterases, pectate lyase, 2x glucanases, endoxylanase, xyloglucan-endotransglycosylase, β-1,4-xylosidase, glucosidase, β-glucuronidase, and chitinase. A β- and α-galactosidase both g β gdeclined.
Four expansins (CpEXPA10, CpEXPA13, CpEXPA14, CpEXPA17) increased and two declined (CpEXPA6, CpEXPA9).
7/15/2009
15
Phytohormone ChangesCpETR2 & CpETR3 up-regulated CpETR1 not expressedCpETR2 & CpETR3 up regulated, CpETR1 not expressed in either stagesCpCTR1 and CpACS1 (ACC synthase) expression declined and CpEIN2 increased three-foldAuxin-related genes mostly declinedGA-related genes were mostly down-regulated g y gCytokinin gene in degradation up-regulated.ABA genes showed little change between the two stagesBrassinosteroid-related genes mostly down-regulated
Papaya Slow RipeningLoss of Firmness during Ripening
100
150
200
250
Line 4-16
SunsetFirmnessN
0
50
100
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21Days from Harvest
7/15/2009
16
Slow-Ripening QTL
Crossed the inbreed lines (Line #8 x Psls), the F1 was selfed and F2 progeny evaluated.
One potential QTL was isolated – LG #1
Predicted to contain ~ 50 genes on supercontig2121.
Eleven show genes little or no expression at the
Slow-Ripening QTLEleven show genes little or no expression at the mature green or the 35% yellow stage of ripening
Seven genes were up-regulated more than two-fold
Twenty-five genes down-regulated
Remainder showed less than two-fold change between stages.
Next step - which gene is it??
7/15/2009
17
Papaya has fewer genes than Arabidopsis with reductions in most gene families and biosynthetic
Summary of Major Findings
reductions in most gene families and biosynthetic pathways.The lower gene number is largely due to lack of recent genome-wide duplication.Papaya has fewer members of gene families involved in fruit ripening, with the exceptions of starch synthase.Thousands of genes change during ripeningPhytohormone changes can be tracked during ripening
Postharvest disease resistance need to look at gene
Future ApplicationsPostharvest disease resistance need to look at gene
expression and modify.Can consider looking at chilling resistance in tropical
fruit.Look at fruit development relating to size, shape and
sugar and acid accumulation.Modify genes associated with fruit ripening; initiation and rate of ripening.Fruit quality as it relates to nutrient content, storage, color, texture and softening.
7/15/2009
18
Primary Funding Sources:University of Hawaii at Manoa & US DoD (81XWH0520013) -MA
Acknowledgements
Maui High Performance Computing Centre -MAHawaii Agriculture Research Centre -RM and QYNankai University, China -LW
Other support the USDA T-STAR program, a USDA-ARS cooperative agreement (CA 58-3020-8-134) with HARC, the University of Illinois and the NSF Plant Genome Research ProgramUniversity of Illinois, and the NSF Plant Genome Research Program.