Tribal Summary Table

Tribal Summary TableSite Name: 2067 Littlefield Lake EnSite #: 26368TCNS # : 131057 TCNS Notification Date: September 4, 2015

Tribe TCNS auto-replyRequest from

TribeFollow Up(s) Final Reply

FCC Referral

Standing Agreements & Comments

Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation

No response within 30 days of TCNS notification, no interest. Requests inadvertent discovery

notification

Sac and Fox Nation of Oklahoma

9/25/2015 interested

10/1//2015 11/10/2015 - No Effect. Requests inadvertant discovery notification.

Sac and Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa

In Missouri only review if site is North of Missouri River; or in

Illinois if site is west of the Illinois River.

9/16/2015 - No interest in site. Requests inadvertent discovery notification.

Huron Potawatomi electronic mail 9/18/2015

Referred 10/29/2015

Cleared 11/18/15

Keweenaw Bay Indian Community

$500 Review Fee. Email project description, legal description, and

archaeological report

9/16/2015 Send fee and requested information for

review

9/18/2015

9/22/2015 - No properties of interest regarding religious or cultural sites documented in proposed location.

Requests inadvertent discovery notification.

Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians

No response within 30 days of TCNS notification, no interest. Requests inadvertent discovery

notification

Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan

9/18/2015

9/30/2015 - No information concerning the presence of any Indian Traditional

Cultural Properties, Sacred Sites or other Significant Properties to the project area.

Request inadvertent discovery notification.




FCC Referral


Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians of

Minnesota

$300 Review fee. Send maps, arch report, SHPO response. Email:

Kade Ferris [email protected]. Requests inadvertant discovery

notification.

9/16/2015 - Interested

9/18/201510/2/2015 - No historic properties will be affected. Requests inadvertant discovery

notification.

Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa

Indians

$300 Review Fee. Email Cultural Resources Report

9/16/2015 - $300 review fee. Requested

information

9/18/2015

9/22/2015 - Project will have no adverse effect. No objections to the project.


Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians

Requires $500 review fee9/19/2015 interested

9/18/2015 9/19/2015 - No known cultural resources

Forest County Potawatomi Community

9/18/2015

Referred 10/29/2015

Cleared 11/18/15

Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians

$400 Review Fee. Topo map, archeology report, legal description.


9/18/2015 9/22/2015 - No concerns

Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma

No response within 30 days of TCNS notification, no interest.

Otherwise requests TCNS number, UTM coordinates, Topo and Aerial Maps, CR Report, Photos, SHPO Response. $550 review fee. $100 review fee for collocations and disturbed locations. Requests

inadvertant discovery notification.

9/22/2015 - Interested in consulting on

this tower.

11/3/2015 -Mailed requested

information with check.

11/23/2015 - No Historic Properties of sacred and/or cultural significance to the Tribe will be impacted by this project. No objection. Requests inadvertant discovery

notification.

Miami Tribe of OklahomaEmail requested information.

Reference consultation Procedures9/24/2015 - Interested

9/18/201512/14/2015 - No objection to the proposed

construction. Requests inadvertent discovery notification.




FCC Referral


Ottawa Tribe of OklahomaInterested in consulting on this tower. Reference consultation

procedures 9/18/2015

10/16/2015 - No known historic properties will be negatively impacted. No issues of concern at tower location.


Wyandotte NationInterested in consulting on this tower. Reference consultation

procedures. 11/3/2015

Referred 1/14/2016 Cleared 2/3/2016

Shawnee TribeMail requested information.

Reference consultation Procedures

9/21/2015 - Interested in consulting on

this tower. Consultation fee.

Follow consultation procedures

9/18/2015

9/24/2015 - No known historic properties will be negatively impacted by

construction of this tower site. No issues of concern at tower location. Requests

inadvertent discovery notification. Tribe also suggests tower be built to guidelines to reduce effects to migratory birds and native vegetation be restored whenever

remotely feasible.

Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation

$400 Review Fee for all projects. Submit projects through the

ccrpd.com website.


9/18/2015 .

11/4/2015 - No cultural resources should be adversely affected by proposed undertaking. Requests inadvertent

discovery notification.

Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa

Indians

9/21/2015 - interested - send

arch report9/18/2015

9/24/2015 - Project has no historic properties. No objections. Requests inadvertent discovery notification.

Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa

$300 Review Fee. Topo & aerial maps, project information


9/18/201510/6/2015 - No historic properties will be affected. Requests inadvertent discovery

notifications.

Sac And Fox Nation

920883 S Hwy. 99 Building A ∙ Stroud, Oklahoma 74079 ∙ (918) 968-1141 ∙ FAX (918) 968-4837

11/10/2015 Ms. Mindi Okai Tribal Consultation Manager Trileaf Environmental & Property Consultants 10845 Olive Boulevard, Suite 260 Saint Louis, MO 63141 RE: TCNS # 131057: Cellco Partnership and its controlled affiliates doing business as Verizon Wireless (Verizon Wireless) – 2067 Littlefield Lake / Ensite #26368 – Trileaf Project #620186; West Stevenson Lake Road, Lake, Isabella County, MI 48632 Dear Ms. Okai: This response is regarding the request from your office for a review of the project listed above for compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and its implementing regulations found in 36 CFR Part 800. We have received your payment of $500.00 in check number 56288 for a communication tower and associated lease area located at West Stevenson Lake Road, Lake, Isabella County, MI 48632. I have enclosed receipt #9.25.014 for your accounts receivable records. We have reviewed the provided SHPO response from the Michigan State Housing Development Authority – State Historic Preservation Office, the FCC Form 620, the Cultural Resource Inventory Survey, photographs, aerial imagery, topographic maps, plat maps, schematics of the proposed project area, and site plans. We find after review of this information that we concur with the SHPO response, the Cultural Resource Inventory Survey, and the findings in the FCC Form 620 for project clearance and provide a recommendation of “No Effect”. Although project clearance is recommended, we remain interested in further communications regarding this project due to the location. The Saukie people have a documented historical presence in Michigan. While there are no documented sites within the project area or within a close proximity outside the project area, there still remains the potential of finding unknown sites in and surrounding the project location. It is further advised that if the area of potential effect changes or in the event of an inadvertent discovery of human remains or other cultural resources that we receive notification within 48 hours. As well, any advertent discovery of human remains or other cultural resources should remain in situ until consultation with interested tribes and agencies is undertaken. Thank you for your time and patience in communications regarding section 106 and NAGPRA issues. We appreciate your continued efforts in such matters. Please do not hesitate to contact me at the information below if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Carol Butler TCNS Coordinator Sac & Fox Nation in Oklahoma Historic Preservation Department – TCNS Program [email protected] or [email protected] (918) 968 – 3526 ext. 1072

mailto:[email protected]

From: [email protected]: tribalCc: [email protected]; [email protected]: Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID: 131057) - Email ID #4343045Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 2:38:17 PM

Dear Mindi Okai,

Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this email is to inform you that an authorized user of the TCNS has replied to a proposed tower construction notification that you had submitted through the TCNS.

The following message has been sent to you from Historic Preservation Director Johnathan L Buffalo of the Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa in reference to Notification ID #131057:

We have no interest in this site. However, if the Applicant discovers archaeological remains or resources during construction, the Applicant should immediately stop construction and notify the appropriate Federal Agency and the Tribe.

For your convenience, the information you submitted for this notification is detailed below.

Notification Received: 09/01/2015 Notification ID: 131057 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: Verizon Wireless Consultant Name: Mindi L Okai Street Address: 10845 Olive Blvd. Suite 260 City: St. Louis State: MISSOURI Zip Code: 63141 Phone: 314-997-6111 Email: [email protected]

Structure Type: MTOWER - Monopole Latitude: 43 deg 46 min 9.1 sec N Longitude: 84 deg 57 min 12.3 sec W Location Description: West Stevenson Lake Road City: Lake State: MICHIGAN County: ISABELLA Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: Ground Elevation: 283.2 meters Support Structure: 59.4 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 60.7 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 343.9 meters above mean sea level





From: [email protected]: tribalCc: [email protected]; [email protected]: Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification of Final Contacts - Email ID #16853Date: Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:03:04 AM

Verizon Wireless Mindi L Okai 10845 Olive Blvd. Suite 260 St. Louis, MO 63141

Dear Applicant:

This letter addresses the proposed communications facilities listed below that you have referred to the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) for purposes of contacting federally recognized Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively Indian Tribes), and Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), as specified by Section IV.G of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA). Consistent with the procedures outlined in the Commission's recent Declaratory Ruling (1), we have contacted the Indian Tribes or NHOs identified in the attached Table for the projects listed in the attached Table. You referred these projects to us between 10/22/2015 and 10/29/2015. Our contact with these Tribal Nations or NHOs was sent on 10/29/2015. Thus, as described in the Declaratory Ruling (2), if you or Commission staff do not receive a statement of interest regarding a particular project from any Tribe or NHO within 20 calendar days of 10/29/2015, your obligations under Section IV of the NPA with respect to these Tribal Nations or NHOs are complete(3). If aTribal Nation or NHO responds that it is interested in participating within the 20 calendar day period, the Applicant must involve it in the review as set forth in the NPA, and may not begin construction until the process set forth in the NPA is completed.

You are reminded that Section IX of the NPA imposes independent obligations on an Applicant when a previously unidentified site that may be a historic property, including an archeological property, is discovered during construction or after the completion of review(4). In such instances, the Applicant must cease construction and promptly notify, among others, any potentially affected Tribal Nation or NHO. A Tribal Nation's or NHO's failure to express interest in participating in pre-construction review of an undertaking does not necessarily mean it is not interested in archeological properties or human remains that may inadvertently be discovered during construction. Hence, an Applicant is still required to notify any potentially affected Tribal Nation or NHO of any such finds pursuant to Section IX or other applicable law.

Sincerely, Dan Abeyta Assistant Chief Spectrum and Competition Policy Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau

_______________________________________1) See Clarification of Procedures for Participation of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian Organizations Under the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement, Declaratory Ruling, FCC 05-176 (released October 6, 2005) (Declaratory Ruling).2) Id S 8-10.3) We note that, under the Declaratory Ruling, an expression of interest by an Indian Tribe or NHO addressed solely to the Commission staff during the 20-day period is sufficient even if it does not contact the Applicant.4) Id at S 11.

LIST OF PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS





Tribe Name: Ute Indian Tribe

TCNS# 131567 Referred Date: 10/28/2015 Location: 41212 Sterling Highway, Soldotna, AK Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: S23 T5N R10W Tribe Name: Kenaitze Indian Tribe Tribe Name: Native Village of Chenega Tribe Name: Native Village of Tyonek (IRA) Tribe Name: Ninilchik Traditional Council Tribe Name: Port Graham Village Council Tribe Name: Sleetmute Traditional Council Tribe Name: Village of Salamatoff

TCNS# 130067 Referred Date: 10/28/2015 Location: 10244 Soda Springs Road, Soda Springs, CA Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: S23 T17N R14EProject Description: Proposed collo at CL 70' on existing 91' monopine. In addition, 25' by 20' additional land needed ( greater than 500 square feet)

Tribe Name: United Auburn Indian Community

TCNS# 130816 Referred Date: 10/28/2015 Location: 5345 Chicamuxen Road, Indian Head, MD Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: No Township found. Tribe Name: Delaware Nation

TCNS# 131038 Referred Date: 10/28/2015 Location: 2868 South Avenue B, Yuma, AZ Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: S6 T9S R23W Tribe Name: Fort Mojave Indian Tribe

TCNS# 131040 Referred Date: 10/28/2015 Location: 1605 West 106th Avenue, Northglenn, CO Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: S9 T2S R68WProject Description: Project is a collocation. Tribe Name: Jicarilla Apache Nation

TCNS# 131040 Referred Date: 10/28/2015 Location: 1605 West 106th Avenue, Northglenn, CO Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: S9 T2S R68WProject Description: Project is a collocation. Tribe Name: Ute Indian Tribe

TCNS# 131046 Referred Date: 10/28/2015 Location: 5300 Saint Charles Road, Berkeley, IL Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: S8 T39N R12E

Project Description: Project is a collocation with less than 500 square feet of ground disturbance in already disturbed ground. Tribe Name: Forest County Potawatomi Community Tribe Name: Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin Tribe Name: Sac and Fox Nation of Missouri Tribe Name: Wyandotte Nation

TCNS# 131054 Referred Date: 10/28/2015 Location: W Side of Hardinsburg Rd, Hardinsburg, IN Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: S2 T1S R2E Tribe Name: Delaware Nation Tribe Name: Forest County Potawatomi Community

TCNS# 131057 Referred Date: 10/28/2015 Location: West Stevenson Lake Road, Lake, MI Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: Tribe Name: Forest County Potawatomi Community Tribe Name: Huron Potawatomi

ediak

Rectangle

ediak

Rectangle

From: Kade FerrisTo: Mindi OkaiSubject: RE: TCNS # 131057 - Red Lake Band - For ReviewDate: Friday, October 02, 2015 2:45:53 PM

In accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations, 36 CFR Part 800, we are providing our assessment of information provided to our office for review. Based on our review of your information, archaeological report, and additional research of the property against our records, we have made a finding that No Historic Properties of importance to the Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians will be affected. No further consultation is required for this project. Regards,

Kade M. FerrisRed Lake Band of Chippewa OAHP Kade M. Ferris, MSTribal Archaeologist/Preservation Officer Red Lake Band of Chippewa IndiansOffice of Archaeology & Historic PreservationPO Box 274 – Red Lake, MN 56671Office (218) 679-1691 Cell (218) 766-8114http://www.redlakenation.org

From: Mindi Okai [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 12:40 PMTo: Kade FerrisSubject: TCNS # 131057 - Red Lake Band - For Review Hello, Please find attached the information and documentation for subject project.If you need any other information to complete your review or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. Please let me know if you have any objections to this project moving forward as soon as possible. Thank you and have a great day!



http://www.redlakenation.org/

Booshoo,

The Ketegitigaaning Ojibwe Nation THPO (Lac Vieux Desert Chippewa/LVD) received your requests for comments or interest concerning the National Historic Preservation Act, Section 106 request for review and comment to the effect on historic and cultural sites within the proposed above referenced project area. Ketegitigaaning Ojibwe Nation does not release any cultural/historical data to any agency outside of the Nation. We will however research and check our databases, maps, and any other pertinent inventory records with regards to said project. Under the authority of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, we have reviewed the above-cited undertaking at the location noted above. Based on the information provided for our review, it is the opinion of the Ketegitigaaning Ojibwe Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) that the project will have no adverse effect [36 CFR § 800.5(b)] on historic properties within the area of potential effects for the above-cited undertaking. This letter evidences the FCC's compliance with 36 CFR § 800.4 “Identification of historic properties” and 36 CFR § 800.5 “Assessment of adverse effects”, and the fulfillment of the FCC’s responsibility to notify the THPO, as a consulting party in the Section 106 process, under 36 CFR § 800.5(c) “Consulting party review”. Referencing above mentioned project we have determined that we have no objections to the project at this time we have now completed the necessary paper work and research for site documentation and will keep the project open until such time it ends. If the scope of work changes in any way, or if artifacts or human remains are discovered please notify LVD immediately. Please forward any future request for review of historic and cultural properties according to the National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 to giiwegiizhigookway Martin, Tribal Historic Preservation Program Officer at the address below. Miigwetch,

giiwegiizhigookway Martin, THPO Ketegitigaaning Ojibwe Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office P.O. 249 (USPS Mailing) E23857 Poplar Circle (FedEx or UPS) Watersmeet, Michigan 49969 Phone: 906-358-0137 Fax: 906-358-4850 Email: [email protected]

Name: TriLeaf

Amount Paid: $ 500.00

CK #: 12189

TCNS#: 131057

Invoice: 7516

Date Closed: 9/22/2015

Initials: gm

From: [email protected]: tribalCc: [email protected]; [email protected]: Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID: 131057) - Email ID #4350155Date: Saturday, September 19, 2015 10:42:40 PM

Dear Mindi Okai,

Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this email is to inform you that an authorized user of the TCNS has replied to a proposed tower construction notification that you had submitted through the TCNS.

The following message has been sent to you from THPO/NAGPRA Representative Wesley L Andrews of the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians in reference to Notification ID #131057:

We have reviewed and researched the information sent to us regarding the proposed project and there are no known cultural resources associated with the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa that would be impacted.

Sincerely,

Wesley Andrews, THPO-NAGPRAThe Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians

For your convenience, the information you submitted for this notification is detailed below.

Notification Received: 09/01/2015 Notification ID: 131057 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: Verizon Wireless Consultant Name: Mindi L Okai Street Address: 10845 Olive Blvd. Suite 260 City: St. Louis State: MISSOURI Zip Code: 63141 Phone: 314-997-6111 Email: [email protected]

Structure Type: MTOWER - Monopole Latitude: 43 deg 46 min 9.1 sec N Longitude: 84 deg 57 min 12.3 sec W Location Description: West Stevenson Lake Road City: Lake State: MICHIGAN County: ISABELLA Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: Ground Elevation: 283.2 meters Support Structure: 59.4 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 60.7 meters above ground level





RED CLIFF BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA INDIANS Tribal Historic Preservation Officer

September 22, 2015 TRILEAF, Mindi Okai, Tribal Coordinator 10845 Olive Boulevard, Suite 260 St. Louis MO 63141

Re: FCC TCNS Site Number: 131057 Littlefield Lake, Isabella County, MI. Dear Ms. Okai, I have reviewed the above-referenced project, as requested for compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and 36 CFR Part 800: Protection of Historic Properties. Based on the current findings and review applicable to proposed area, the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer has no concerns and concurs with your findings regarding proposed ground disturbing impacts. You have concluded your requirements as outlined in Section 106 of the NHPA. It is the recommendation of this office that the proposed project will have “NO EFFECTS”, and may proceed as planned. Thank you for your diligence in addressing NHPA 36 CFR 800 responsibilities. Sincerely, Larry Balber Tribal Historic Preservation Officer 88385 Pike Rd, HWY 13 Bayfield, Wisconsin 54814 Cc: file 131057 Littlefield Lake-Trileaf

EASTERN SHAWNEE TRIBE

OF OKLAHOMA 12755 S. 705 Road, Wyandotte, OK 74370

Bluejacket Building (918) 666-2435, Fax: 888-971-3905

Trileaf ATTN: Mindi Okai 10845 Olive Boulevard, Suite 260 St. Louis, MO 63141 RE: Cell Tower Project 2067 Littlefield Lake, Lake, Isabella County, MI TCNS 131057 November 23, 2015 Dear Ms. Okai, The Cultural Preservation Department of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma (ESTO) has received the documentation for Trileaf’s proposed telecommunications project, 2067 Littlefield Lake, located at UTM Zone 16, 664719 m E, 4848273 m N (WGS84) in/near Lake in Isabella County, MI. ESTO has reviewed the project, TCNS 131057, in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Based on the information provided and a review of our records, we find that No Historic Properties of sacred and/or cultural significance to the Tribe will be impacted by this project. Therefore, ESTO has no objection to the project proceeding as described; however, please note that any future changes to this project may require additional consultation. In accordance with the NHPA of 1966 (16 U.S.C. § 470-470w-6), federally funded, licensed, or permitted undertakings that are subject to the Section 106 review process must determine effects to significant historic properties. As clarified in Section 101(d)(6)(A-B), historic properties may have religious and/or cultural significance to Indian Tribes. Section 106 of NHPA requires Federal agencies to consider the effects of their actions on all significant historic properties (36 CFR Part 800) as does the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (43 U.S.C. § 4321-4347 and 40 CFR § 1501.7(a). This letter evidences NHPA and NEPA historic properties compliance pertaining to consultation with this Tribe in regard to the proposed project referenced as 2067 Littlefield Lake, TCNS 131057. However, if during construction cultural objects or human remains are inadvertently discovered, please stop work immediately and contact the Cultural Preservation Department of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma. Thank you for consulting with the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma. Robin Dushane Jennifer Sigler Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Tribal Archaeologist

From: Scott WillardTo: Mindi OkaiSubject: TCNS responsesDate: Monday, December 14, 2015 4:00:20 PM

Greetings Mindi,

Thank you for your patience. Below is our response for the listed TCNS projects. If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thank you,

Scott WillardSecond CouncilpersonAssistant to THPO/CROEmergency ManagerMiami [email protected]

Re: TCNS 125734 136853 127880 128075 128096 129788 129790130081 130082 130089 130093 130096 130097 130100130108 130113 130320 130322 130576 130578 130815131054 131057 131115 131118 131172 131176 131180131350 131356 131451 131453 131744 131778 132446

The Miami Tribe of Oklahoma is satisfied with efforts conducted to be sure that no Miami historic properties or other Miami cultural resources will likely be adversely affected by construction and use of this tower. The Miami Tribe of Oklahoma is not currently aware of any specific Miami cultural or historic sites in this project area. We therefore offer no objection to the proposed construction.

Because this tower lies in the homelands of the Miami, in the event that archaeological materials, including human remains, are discovered during construction or later ground-disturbing activities at this location, please re-open consultation at that time by contacting our THPO, Diane Hunter, at [email protected]. Similarly, if plans are considered to expand or modify this tower and cause additional ground disturbance in the future, please let us know. Please forward the Tribe's concerns regarding any such future work and unanticipated discoveries, as well as our contact information, to the appropriate parties.

We urge everyone involved with cell tower development to construct and maintain their projects in keeping with best practices for minimizing environmental impact - particularly on species, such as birds and bats, who might incur negative impacts from cell tower development and use. Please also re-vegetate with species native to the area.

We appreciate your efforts to consult with us.





ediak

Rectangle

ediak

Rectangle

November 3, 2015 Wyandotte Nation Ms. Sherri Clemons Tribal Heritage Department 64700 E. Highway 60 Wyandotte, OK 74370 RE: Cellco Partnership and its controlled affiliates doing business as Verizon Wireless (Verizon

Wireless) – 2067 Littlefield Lake / Ensite #26368 – Trileaf Project #620186 West Stevenson Lake Road, Lake, MI 48632 Isabella County, Woods Quadrangle (DeLorme 1983) Latitude: 43° 46’ 9.1” N, Longitude: 84° 57’ 12.3” W UTM Zone: 16T 664719mE 4848273mN Survey area: .44 acres TCNS# 131057; Legal Description: Section 19, Township 16N, Range 5W

Dear Ms. Clemons: This project was originally submitted to your tribe via TCNS on September 18, 2015; TCNS #131057. Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a NEPA Checklist at the above referenced property. Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on, or within the viewshed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that is listed or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places, or located in or on, or within the viewshed of an Indian Religious Site. Our research to date has not indicated that any of these conditions exists. However, Trileaf has learned your tribe has an interest in property located within this County. Our client proposes to construct a 199-foot monopole telecommunications tower within a 100-foot by 100-foot lease area. The project includes a 30-foot wide access and utility easement that extends north connecting with West Stevenson Lake Road. Currently the proposed site consists of forested land. The archeological report, site location maps, photos and SHPO response are enclosed for your reference. The $600 review was mailed. Please let us know if you have any objections or comments on this project as soon as possible. Please call me at (314) 997-6111 or email [email protected] or [email protected] if you need additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Sincerely, Mindi Okai Tribal Consultation Manager

10845 Olive Boulevard, Suite 260, Saint Louis, Missouri 63141 314.997.6111 www.trileaf.com



From: [email protected]: tribalCc: [email protected]; [email protected]: Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification of Final Contacts - Email ID #17253Date: Thursday, January 14, 2016 8:03:40 AM

Central States Towers Mindi L Okai 10845 Olive Blvd. Suite 260 St. Louis, MO 63141

Dear Applicant:

This letter addresses the proposed communications facilities listed below that you have referred to the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) for purposes of contacting federally recognized Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively Indian Tribes), and Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), as specified by Section IV.G of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA). Consistent with the procedures outlined in the Commission's recent Declaratory Ruling (1), we have contacted the Indian Tribes or NHOs identified in the attached Table for the projects listed in the attached Table. You referred these projects to us between 01/07/2016 and 01/14/2016. Our contact with these Tribal Nations or NHOs was sent on 01/14/2016. Thus, as described in the Declaratory Ruling (2), if you or Commission staff do not receive a statement of interest regarding a particular project from any Tribe or NHO within 20 calendar days of 01/14/2016, your obligations under Section IV of the NPA with respect to these Tribal Nations or NHOs are complete(3). If aTribal Nation or NHO responds that it is interested in participating within the 20 calendar day period, the Applicant must involve it in the review as set forth in the NPA, and may not begin construction until the process set forth in the NPA is completed.

You are reminded that Section IX of the NPA imposes independent obligations on an Applicant when a previously unidentified site that may be a historic property, including an archeological property, is discovered during construction or after the completion of review(4). In such instances, the Applicant must cease construction and promptly notify, among others, any potentially affected Tribal Nation or NHO. A Tribal Nation's or NHO's failure to express interest in participating in pre-construction review of an undertaking does not necessarily mean it is not interested in archeological properties or human remains that may inadvertently be discovered during construction. Hence, an Applicant is still required to notify any potentially affected Tribal Nation or NHO of any such finds pursuant to Section IX or other applicable law.

Sincerely, Dan Abeyta Assistant Chief Spectrum and Competition Policy Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau

_______________________________________1) See Clarification of Procedures for Participation of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian Organizations Under the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement, Declaratory Ruling, FCC 05-176 (released October 6, 2005) (Declaratory Ruling).2) Id S 8-10.3) We note that, under the Declaratory Ruling, an expression of interest by an Indian Tribe or NHO addressed solely to the Commission staff during the 20-day period is sufficient even if it does not contact the Applicant.4) Id at S 11.

LIST OF PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS





TCNS# 131057 Referred Date: 01/13/2016 Location: West Stevenson Lake Road, Lake, MI Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: Tribe Name: Wyandotte Nation

TCNS# 133381 Referred Date: 01/13/2016 Location: 5465 West Happy Holler Road, Brazil, IN Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: S17 T12N R7W Tribe Name: Cherokee Nation Tribe Name: Forest County Potawatomi Community

TCNS# 133784 Referred Date: 01/13/2016 Location: 270 West Center Street, Hinckley, UT Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: S19 T17S R7W Tribe Name: Ute Indian Tribe

TCNS# 132923 Referred Date: 01/13/2016 Location: Salado School Road, Salado, TX Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: No Township Found Tribe Name: Mescalero Apache Tribe

TCNS# 133133 Referred Date: 01/13/2016 Location: 260 Sunshine Lane, Reno, NV Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: S7 T19N R20EProject Description: Adding three new panel antennas at CL 56ft on existing 64ft monopole. No additional ground needed. Tribe Name: Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe Tribe Name: Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Tribe Name: Reno-Sparks Indian Colony

TCNS# 133136 Referred Date: 01/13/2016 Location: 11251 Montgomery Road, Cincinnati, OH Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: S36 T5E R1NProject Description: Proposed 150 ft. (160 ft. overall height) monopole tower within a new 50 ft. by 60 ft. compound, and a new access/utility easement.

Tribe Name: Wyandotte Nation

TCNS# 131077 Referred Date: 01/14/2016 Location: 185 Skyline Drive, Kersey, PA Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: No Township Found.

Tribe Name: Wyandotte Nation

TCNS# 132440 Referred Date: 01/14/2016 Location: 2100 Block E. 8th Street, Muncie, IN Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: S14 T20N R10E Tribe Name: Wyandotte Nation

LEGEND:* - Notification numbers are assigned by the Commission staff for sites where initial contact was not made through TCNS.

ediak

Rectangle

ediak

Rectangle

9740 Upper Box Elder Road | P.O. Box 230 | Box Elder, MT 59521 |PHONE 406-395-4700 | FAX 406-395-5444

To: Trileaf Corporation

Date: 11/4/15 Project: 2067 Littlefield Lake

TCNS Number: 131057

Under the authority of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and in

accordance with 36 CFR 800.2A4, after reviewing the materials you provided for the 6115004298 Project,

the Chippewa Cree Tribal Historic Preservation Office concurs that a finding of no cultural properties is

warranted and we will not require a tribal monitor to be present for this proposed project.

The proposed undertaking does not directly affect a documented tribal cultural resource. The

vicinity of the project is significant to the Chippewa Cree Tribe. According to our tribal elders, historians,

and archaeological/anthropological evidence, the Chippewa & Cree Tribes have a long and storied

history throughout Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, North Dakota,

and Montana. That history includes major sacred events, encampments, medicinal plants and other

significant markers that indicate our footprint throughout this entire region. Since the area around the

project was heavily utilized in prehistoric times, it is particularly important for the ground disturbance to

remain in the areas designated in the original site plans.

No further cultural resource work is necessary for this project as long as the areas outlined are

adhered to. If additional work is necessary outside the areas designated, please notify our department

to make the necessary arrangements. In the unlikely event that an artifact of unknown cultural origin is

uncovered during ground disturbing activities, we request that all construction activities cease and that

our office is contacted immediately for a review.

Thank you,

Alvin Windy Boy, Sr.

Tribal Historic Preservation Officer

X FINDING OF NO CULTURAL PROPERTIES – The potential for cultural resources to be present within or near

your proposed project is low and should not result in an adverse effect. However, if cultural materials are

discovered during construction please notify the Chippewa Cree Cultural Resource Preservation

Department or Tribal Historic Preservation Office.

From: ldfthpoTo: Mindi OkaiSubject: RE: TCNS # 131057 - Lac du Flambeau - For ReviewDate: Thursday, September 24, 2015 2:49:02 PM

Ms. Okai, The Lac du Flambeau Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) received your requests for comments or interest concerning the National Historic Preservation Act, Section 106 request for review and comment to the effect on historic and cultural sites within the proposed above referenced project area. The Lac du Flambeau Tribe does not release any cultural/historical data to any agency outside of the Tribe. We will, however research and check our databases, maps, and any other pertinent inventory records with regards to said project. Under the authority of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, we have reviewed the above-cited undertaking at the location noted above. Based on the information provided for our review, it is the opinion of the Lac du Flambeau THPO that the project has No Historic Properties within the project area. This letter evidences the FCC's compliance with 36 CFR § 800.4 “Identification of historic properties” and 36 CFR § 800.5 “Assessment of adverse effects”, and the fulfillment of the FCC’s responsibility to notify the THPO, as a consulting party in the Section 106 process, under 36 CFR § 800.5(c) “Consulting party review”. Referencing above mentioned project we have determined that we have no objections to the project at this time we have now completed the necessary paper work and research for site documentation and will keep the project open until such time it ends. If the scope of work changes in any way, or if artifacts or human remains are discovered please notify Lac du Flambeau immediately. Sarah Schuman, Assistant Tribal Historic Preservation OfficerForMelinda Young,Tribal Historic Preservation OfficerP.O. Box 67Lac du Flambeau, WI 54538Phone: 715-588-4381www.ldftribe.com

- 8066



http://www.ldftribe.com/

TMBCI Tribal Historic Preservation Office PO Box 900 – Belcourt, North Dakota 58316 – (701) 477-2640 phone (701) 477-3593 Fax

Bruce F. Nadeau Sr. THPO [email protected]

(701) 278-2756 mobile

www.tmdnr.webs.com

10/6/15

Mindi Okai Tribal Consultation Manager TRILEAF

RE: 130082 – 131057 - 131176

The Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians has conducted a tribal records search of the above referenced project against our internal cultural resources database. Our search did not result in any known cultural resources of importance to the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians within the project location. The Turtle Mountain THPO issues a finding of No Historic Properties Affected in regards to tribal sites of religious or cultural significance for the projects. Consultation with the Turtle Mountain Tribe is considered complete. If any adverse discoveries are found please notify the Tribal Historic Preservation Office.

Thank you for your time and consideration of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa and our cultural resources. Sincerely,

Bruce F. Nadeau Sr. Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa


http://www.tmdnr.webs.com/

ediak

Rectangle

10845 Olive Boulevard, Suite 260, Saint Louis, Missouri 63141 - 314.997.6111 - www.trileaf.com

February 3, 2016 RE: Cellco Partnership and its controlled affiliates doing business as Verizon Wireless

(Verizon Wireless) 2067 Littlefield Lake / EnSite# 26368 – Trileaf Project# 620186 West Stevenson Lake Road, Lake, MI 48632 Isabella County, Woods Quadrangle (DeLorme 1983) Latitude: 43° 46’ 9.1” N, Longitude: 84° 57’ 12.3” W TCNS #: 131057

All notified Tribes either responded that no issues existed with the proposed action or communication was referred to the FCC through the TCNS system and the appropriate waiting time has expired. This also certifies that should I receive in the future any Tribal request regarding this site, Trileaf Corporation will notify Verizon Wireless immediately. Sincerely,

Erika Diak Project Scientist I

UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERY PLAN FOR VERIZON WIRELESS PROJECTS

REGARDING CULTURAL RESOURCES AND HUMAN SKELETAL REMAINS

REVISED JUNE 2013

The purpose of this Unanticipated Discovery Plan (UDP) is as a last line of defense for the

protection of cultural resources. After Section 106 compliance efforts, including records

research, professional cultural resources survey, tribal consultation, consultation with the

public, consultation with the local government, and consultation with SHPO, have identified no

historic within the direct Area of Potential Effect (APE), Verizon wishes to provide further

assurance that any unidentified historic properties that may be present will be appropriately

protected. So, in the highly unlikely event that historic properties not identified during the

Section 106 consultation process are present within the direct APE, the UDP will guide field

personnel in the appropriate steps to take to protect historic properties. The purpose of the UDP

is to make field personnel aware that, in spite of negative research, survey, and consultation

findings, cultural resources could still be present, and that construction should cease if any

cultural resources are encountered. Further, the UDP guides steps that should be taken

following any unanticipated discovery. While the specific points of contact will vary regionally,

the general guidelines regarding the appropriate steps to follow should be applicable across the

US. The procedures outlined in this UDP are in no way intended to replace or supercede the

role of a tribal or other cultural resources monitor during construction, when consulting parties

agree that such a monitor should be present. Furthermore, the UDP is not intended to allow

any short-cuts or reduction of effort in any part of the Section 106 consultation process.

As used within this UDP, inadvertent, unanticipated, or emergency discoveries, also known as

chance finds, are defined as:

• Newly discovered previously unidentified archaeological sites.

• Artifacts or cultural materials within previously recorded archaeological sites that warrant

further evaluation.

• Any evidence of human remains or graves. All discoveries of bone are to be treated by

construction personnel as potential human remains until a determination regarding whether the

2

VZW/NEPA Regulatory Compliance REVISED—June 2013 Unanticipated Discovery Plan

remains are human can be made by a qualified individual, such as a coroner, an archaeologist,

or an osteologist. Any bone encountered must be left in place to the extent possible until the

appropriate experts determine their origin and proper disposition (which may be to leave them

in place and rebury them, perhaps more deeply to avoid further disturbance).

What is a cultural resource?

The first step in dealing appropriately with unanticipated discoveries is recognizing cultural

resources and human remains when they are encountered. Since this UDP is intended for use

by field personnel rather than by cultural resources specialists, a brief summary of types of

cultural resources is provided. The intention is to make field personnel aware of cultural

resources that they may encounter. The intention is not to train field personnel to act as cultural

resource specialists—but to recognize when cultural resource specialists should be consulted.

A cultural resource discovery could be prehistoric or historic, and can consist of artifacts or of

features. Cultural resources are anything exhibiting modification by humans. Stones broken in a

certain way during the manufacture of stone tools are artifacts, as are metal nails or glass

fragments from more recent activities. Cultural features are evidence in the ground of previous

activities, for example a hearth, or a mound of burned rock. Examples of cultural resources

include:

• An accumulation of burned rocks and/or shell

• An area of charcoal or very dark stained or reddened soil, possibly with artifacts

• Stone tools or waste flakes (i.e. an arrowhead, or stone chips)

• Clusters of tin cans or bottles, ceramics, glass, buttons, marbles, pipes, figurines, or doll parts,

and identifiable metal (tools, gun parts, machine parts, hinges, nails, buckles, flatware, wagon

hardware, horse tack) and agricultural equipment that could include items older than 50 years

• Privies (outhouse pits), wells, cisterns, root cellars—any unnatural depression

• Standing structures such as barns, houses, and silos or remains of structures, including buried

walls or foundations

• Buried railroad tracks, decking, or other industrial materials

3


• Earth and/or rock mounded up above the normal ground surface—any unnatural

prominence

• A trench or pit excavated below the normal ground surface

• Anything that is more symmetrical or regular than expected in nature

• Bones that do not clearly belong to an animal, or evidence of human burials or graves—these receive

special treatment, as described below.

If an object or a feature in the landscape does not look natural, then it is more than likely

cultural. It is best to be conservative, and assume that the material or feature is a cultural

resource if there is any uncertainty.

The identification of cultural resources requires basic training to recognize potential sites,

artifacts, and cultural features of significance. It is recommended that all relevant personnel and

construction contractor personnel be provided basic orientation training designed to facilitate

the recognition of cultural resources and human remains. Such training should be

supplemented by a quick-reference guide to cultural resources that should be available in the

field—perhaps to accompany health and safety documents. In addition, the training and quick-

reference guide should emphasize the exact procedures to be followed in the event of an

unanticipated significant site discovery, such as the discovery of human remains.

What do I do if I find a cultural resource?

1. If you are engaged in work near the cultural resource, stop work immediately, and secure

and protect the discovery location. If you are not engaged in work near the discovery location,

mark the spot so that you can find it again.

2. Do not move anything once you are aware that there may be cultural material present, and do

not remove anything from the location. If anything has already been disturbed, leave it where it

lies until further instruction. If you can take photos without disturbing anything, please do so.

Do not take photos of suspected human remains—any bones or possible graves (see below for

treatment of suspected human burials).

4


3. Immediately notify a designated supervisor and Verizon Wireless--NEPA Regulatory

Compliance (NRC), of the discovery. Do not discuss the discovery with anyone other than your

supervisor, unless asked to do so by your supervisor. Once made aware of the discovery, the

designated supervisor will immediately notify a qualified archaeologist.

4. Information about the discovery will be provided to the archaeologist, who will provide

guidance on immediate protection measures in the field, until he or she can reach the site.

5. Once the archaeologist has examined the cultural material and developed an assessment of

the significance of the cultural resource based on a visit to the discovery location,

recommendations will be developed through discussion with NRC, to be presented to the State

Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), federal agency, and potentially interested tribes. If the

discovery is deemed potentially significant, NRC, and the archeologist should consult and

coordinate appropriate mitigation measures for treating and handling the discovery, while

minimizing impacts to the construction schedule to the extent possible.

What do I do if I find remains that could be human, or a burial or grave site?

The Project will be subject to state and possibly local laws regarding treatment or disturbance of

human remains. In the event that any human remains are encountered during construction, the

following plan outlines the general procedures to be followed. Before any action is taken,

applicable local and state laws must be consulted.

If you find remains that could be human, or a burial or grave site:

1. Unless you are absolutely sure that the bones represent an animal, as you might be in

the case of an articulated deer skeleton, bones should be treated as if they are human

until an expert determines otherwise.

2. If you are engaged in work near the discovery, stop work immediately, and secure and

protect the discovery location. If you are not engaged in work near the discovery

location, mark the spot so that you can find it again, and protect it to the extent possible.

3. Do not move or touch anything once you are aware that there may be human remains or

graves present, and do not remove anything from the location. If anything has already

been disturbed, leave it where it lies, carefully covered and protected from degradation

5


by weather or unauthorized individuals. The Site Manager will partition off the area and

take all necessary steps to ensure that the site is not disturbed.

4. Do not photograph any possible human remains or graves or associated artifacts.

5. Immediately notify your supervisor and NRC, of the discovery. The designated

supervisor will immediately notify a qualified archaeologist/physical anthropologist

and the Site Manager.

6. Always be sure to treat human remains and graves with respect and dignity. Do not

speak to anyone other than your designated supervisor about the discovery, unless

asked to do so by your supervisor.

7. Once the archaeologist or other appropriate expert, such as physical anthropologist or

osteologist, confirms that human remains or graves are present, based a site visit, the

Site Manager will notify Verizon Wireless’s Project Manager and the appropriate local

law enforcement agency and/or coroner.

8. If the local law enforcement agency and/or coroner determine that the human remains

or grave are of recent origin, the discovery location will be treated as a crime scene

under the direction of local law enforcement officers.

If the local law enforcement agency and/or coroner find that there is no need for a legal inquiry

or for a criminal investigation, it is recommended that the following best practices be applied:

(a) NRC will immediately notify the FCC of the discovery, and the actions planned.

(b) NRC will immediately notify SHPO and other appropriate state agencies (such as the State

Archaeologist’s Office, if applicable).

(c) NRC will immediately contact any tribes who have requested notice of such discoveries, and

any other who may be interested.

(d) If possible, leave the grave or remains undisturbed in their original condition.

(e) Consult legal advice if modern or historic burials need to be relocated, as special restrictions

and requirements may apply.

(c) NRC, through discussion with FCC, SHPO, interested tribes, and any other interested parties

will develop a plan of action.

No work should proceed in the vicinity of the discovery until the disposition of the discovery is

resolved. If work must proceed in the general area of the discovery before the disposition of the

6


discovery is final, full-time monitoring by a qualified archaeologist is recommended. A tribal

monitor may also be appropriate, as determined by consultation with interested federally

recognized tribes.

ediak

Oval

ediak

Line

ediak

Callout

Site Location

Sep 2, 2015

This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is notresponsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. Allwetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found onthe Wetlands Mapper web site.

User Remarks:

ediak

Oval

ediak

Polygonal Line

ediak

Callout

Site Location

Soil Map—Isabella County, Michigan

Natural ResourcesConservation Service

Web Soil SurveyNational Cooperative Soil Survey

9/2/2015Page 1 of 3

4848

010

4848

080

4848

150

4848

220

4848

290

4848

360

4848

430

4848

500

4848

570

4848

010

4848

080

4848

150

4848

220

4848

290

4848

360

4848

430

4848

500

4848

570

664500 664570 664640 664710 664780 664850 664920

664500 664570 664640 664710 664780 664850 664920

43° 46' 19'' N84

° 5

7' 2

2'' W

43° 46' 19'' N

84° 5

7' 2

'' W

43° 45' 59'' N

84° 5

7' 2

2'' W

43° 45' 59'' N

84° 5

7' 2

'' W

N

Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 16N WGS840 100 200 400 600

Feet0 40 80 160 240

MetersMap Scale: 1:3,000 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.

ediak

Oval

ediak

Line

ediak

Line

MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION

Area of Interest (AOI)Area of Interest (AOI)

SoilsSoil Map Unit Polygons

Soil Map Unit Lines

Soil Map Unit Points

Special Point FeaturesBlowout

Borrow Pit

Clay Spot

Closed Depression

Gravel Pit

Gravelly Spot

Landfill

Lava Flow

Marsh or swamp

Mine or Quarry

Miscellaneous Water

Perennial Water

Rock Outcrop

Saline Spot

Sandy Spot

Severely Eroded Spot

Sinkhole

Slide or Slip

Sodic Spot

Spoil Area

Stony Spot

Very Stony Spot

Wet Spot

Other

Special Line Features

Water FeaturesStreams and Canals

TransportationRails

Interstate Highways

US Routes

Major Roads

Local Roads

BackgroundAerial Photography

The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:15,800.

Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can causemisunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil lineplacement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrastingsoils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.

Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for mapmeasurements.

Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation ServiceWeb Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.govCoordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)

Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercatorprojection, which preserves direction and shape but distortsdistance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as theAlbers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accuratecalculations of distance or area are required.

This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as ofthe version date(s) listed below.

Soil Survey Area: Isabella County, MichiganSurvey Area Data: Version 8, Sep 16, 2014

Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000or larger.

Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 20, 2010—May25, 2010

The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines werecompiled and digitized probably differs from the backgroundimagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shiftingof map unit boundaries may be evident.




9/2/2015Page 2 of 3

Map Unit Legend

Isabella County, Michigan (MI073)

Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI

36 Adrian muck, 0 to 1 percentslopes

6.4 100.0%

Totals for Area of Interest 6.4 100.0%




9/2/2015Page 3 of 3

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge System Map

North

USFWS – Wildlife Refuge Map Verizon Wireless – 2067 Littlefield Lake West Stevenson Lake Road Lake, MI 48632

Site Location

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Critical Habitat Map

North

USFWS – Critical Habitat Map Verizon Wireless – 2067 Littlefield Lake West Stevenson Lake Road Lake, MI 48632

Site Location

North American Migration Flyways

North

Migratory Bird Flyways – Location Map Verizon Wireless – 2067 Littlefield Lake West Stevenson Lake Road Lake, MI 48632

Site Location

National Park Service National Historic Trails and Scenic Routes

North

National Park Service – Trails and Routes Map Verizon Wireless – 2067 Littlefield Lake West Stevenson Lake Road Lake, MI 48632

Site Location

Bureau of Indian Affairs Indian Reservation Map

North

Bureau of Indian Affairs – Reservation Map Verizon Wireless – 2067 Littlefield Lake West Stevenson Lake Road Lake, MI 48632

Site Location

Appendix D

Local Zoning and Planning Documentation

HERRICK RD

GRASS LAKE RD

STEVENSON LAKE RD

GLAS

S RD

BATTLE RD

COLEMAN RDVA

NDEC

AR RD

WIN

N RD

GILM

ORE

RD

010203040506

07

18 17

08 09

16 15 14 13

121110

24

25

3635

26

2322

27

3433

28

212019

30

31 32

29

Data Sources:1989 County Zoning Map (as amended) - I.C.P.C.Projection - NAD 1983 Michigan GeoRef - Meters

THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONPURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT THE

OFFICIAL RECORD OF THE COUNTY.

0 1 20.5Miles

County Zoning MapGilmore TownshipIsabella County, Michigan

JUNE 2007

´

LAKES AREA RESIDENTIAL (L-R)

AGRICULTURAL BUFFER (AG-3)

GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-1)

RESTRICTIVE AGRICULTURAL (AG-1)

GENERAL AGRICULTURAL (AG-2)

ekinzinger

Oval

ekinzinger

Callout

Site Location

Tribal Summary Table

Documents

Transcript of Tribal Summary Table