Trends in Educational Achievement:

32
Trends in Educational Achievement: An International, National and Local Comparison of Student Performance

description

Trends in Educational Achievement: An International, National and Local Comparison of Student Performance. Where We Stand Internationally. Where We Stand Internationally. Where we Stand Internationally. Racial Achievement Gap. Racial Achievement Gap. Racial Achievement Gap. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Trends in Educational Achievement:

Page 1: Trends in Educational Achievement:

Trends in Educational

Achievement:An International, National and Local Comparison of Student Performance

Page 2: Trends in Educational Achievement:

Where We Stand Internationally

Page 3: Trends in Educational Achievement:

Where We Stand Internationally

Page 4: Trends in Educational Achievement:

Where we Stand Internationally

Page 5: Trends in Educational Achievement:

Racial Achievement Gap

Page 6: Trends in Educational Achievement:

Racial Achievement Gap

Page 7: Trends in Educational Achievement:

Racial Achievement Gap

Page 8: Trends in Educational Achievement:

Racial Achievement Gap

Page 9: Trends in Educational Achievement:

Income Achievement Gap

Page 10: Trends in Educational Achievement:

Intersection of Race and Poverty

Page 11: Trends in Educational Achievement:

Intersection of Race and Poverty

Page 12: Trends in Educational Achievement:

What makes a difference?

Page 13: Trends in Educational Achievement:

Multi-County Comparisons of Reading AYP, 2007-2008% Achieving Proficiency, by race

Page 14: Trends in Educational Achievement:

Multi-County Comparisons of Reading AYP, 2007-2008% Achieving Proficiency, by social factor

Page 15: Trends in Educational Achievement:

Multi-County Comparison of 2008 SAT Scores*

Average total (2400 max)

Average Reading + Math (1600 max)

*Effective fall 2007, the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) was expanded to include a writing section. Each of the three sections can now receive a maximum score of 800 points, making possible a total score of 2400 on all three sections.

Page 16: Trends in Educational Achievement:

Multi-County Comparison

% students taking SAT, 2008

Page 17: Trends in Educational Achievement:

CMS EOG Math Result 2006-09

% Level III/IV, by race

All Students Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

64%

81%

47%54%

67%

86%

65%

81%

49%56%

70%

87%

67%

83%

52%59%

72%

88%

0.71

0.85

0.57

0.660000000000001

0.91

2006 2007 2008 2009

Page 18: Trends in Educational Achievement:

CMS EOG Math Result 2006-08% Level III/IV, by social factor

47%

64%

41%

56%

48%

65%

52%48%

67%71%

68%

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

All Students Econ Disadvantaged Limted English

2006 2007 2008 2009

Page 19: Trends in Educational Achievement:

2007-08 Multi-County Comparison,

Graduation Rates by Gender

Page 20: Trends in Educational Achievement:

2007-08 Multi-County Comparison,Graduation Rates by Social Factor

Page 21: Trends in Educational Achievement:

2007-08 Multi-County Comparison,Graduation Rates by Race

Page 22: Trends in Educational Achievement:
Page 23: Trends in Educational Achievement:
Page 24: Trends in Educational Achievement:
Page 25: Trends in Educational Achievement:
Page 26: Trends in Educational Achievement:

CMS Math Scores - 2009

Page 27: Trends in Educational Achievement:

CMS Math Gap Trends

Page 28: Trends in Educational Achievement:

CMS Reading Scores - 2009

Page 29: Trends in Educational Achievement:

CMS Reading Gap Trends

Page 30: Trends in Educational Achievement:

CMS Science Scores - 2009

Page 31: Trends in Educational Achievement:

CMS Science Gap Trends

Page 32: Trends in Educational Achievement:

• 1. CMS Department of Instructional Accountability• http://pmd.cms.k12.nc.us/School%20Performance/Schools/Profile.aspx

• 2. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction• http://ayp.ncpublicschools.org/2008/app/leaimp/Detail.cgi

• 3. ies National Center for Education Statistics• http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d07/tables/dt07_100.asp

• 4. McKinsey & Company Social Sector Office• http://mckinsey.com/clientservice/socialsector/achievementgap.asp

• 5. Multi-County Comparison of Students Taking SAT• http://

www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/newsroom/news/2008-09/0826/sat-performance.pdf

• 6. Education Resource Strategies: “Rethinking Resources for Student Success,” January 27, 2009

REFERENCES