Treasurer Truth Affidavit

Moorish Americans – Northwest Amexem

Noble Wendell Brown-El c/o P.O. 88045 Indianapolis, Indiana [46208] 1 | P a g e

TRUTH AFFIDAVIT IN THE NATURE OF SUPPLEMENTAL RULES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND MARITIME CLAIMS RULES C(6)

COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE, DECLARATION, AND DEMAND FAIR NOTICE AND WARNING OF COMMERCIAL GRACE

NOTICE OF NON-JUDICIAL PROCEEDING THIS IS A U.S. S.E.C. TRACER FLAG, NOT A POINT OF LAW

A SECURITY (15 U.S.C.)

COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT

U.S. S.E.C. TRACR FLAG

NOT A POINT OF LAW

READ ATTACHED APPENDIX A

I, Noble Wendell Brown-El, the Undersigned, do solemnly swear, declare, and depose:

1. THAT I am competent to state to the matters set forth herein.

2. THAT I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.

3. THAT all the facts stated herein are true, correct, and certain, admissible as evidence, and if called upon as a witness, I

will testify to their veracity.

4. THAT the eternal, unchanged principles of Commercial Law are:

a) A workman is worth of his hire.

b) All are equal under the law.

c) In Commerce, truth is sovereign,

d) Truth is expressed in the form of affidavit.

e) An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in Commerce.

f) An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in Commerce.

g) All matters must be expressed to be resolved.

h) He who leaves the battlefield first loses by default.

i) Sacrifice is the measure of credibility.

j) A lien or claim can be satisfied only through an affidavit by a point-for-point rebuttal, resolution by jury or

payment.

5. THAT Commercial processes ARE NON-JUDICIAL and pre-judicial because:

a) No judge, court, government or any agencies thereof, or any other third parties whatsoever, can abrogate

anyone’s affidavit of truth; and

b) Only a party affected by an affidavit can speak and act for himself and is solely responsible for responding with

his own affidavit of truth, which no one else can do for him.



PARTIES

1. Affiant Noble Wendell Brown-El (“Affiant”) is a Moorish American National dwelling in the state of Indiana. Affiant

alleges that, inter alia, Respondents defrauded him by sending him a fake deed to parcel #101-1029130 (“Parcel”) and

resold the property to Steven Reeves.

2. Respondent MARION COUNTY BOARD of COMMISSIONERS (“Commissioners”) is comprised of three elected officials.

The MARION COUNTY ASSESSOR serves as PRESIDENT; The MARION COUNTY TREASURER serves as VICE PRESIDENT;

and MARION COUNTY AUDITOR serves as SECRETARY OF THE BOARD. The MARION COUNTY BOARD of

COMMISSIONERS oversees the maintenance and disposal of MARION COUNTY OWNED PROPERTY. The office of the

MARION COUNTY COMMISSIONERS is located in SUITE 1060 CITY-COUNTY BUILDING 200 EAST WASHINGTON STREET

INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204.

3. Respondent MARION COUNTY TREASURER (“Treasurer”) is located in Suite 1001 CITY-COUNTY BUILDING 200 EAST

WASHINGTON STREET INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204.

4. Respondent C. DAMIAN CORNACCHIONE (“Damian”) is an employee in the SURPLUS PROPERTY DEPARTMENT of the

MARION COUNTY TREASURER’S OFFICE.

5. Witness Steven Reeves (“Neighbor”) is an individual who lives at the property located at 2717 Riverside Drive East

Indianapolis, Indiana 46208, which is directly next door to the Parcel at issue. Steven Reeves purchased the illegally

obtained property from the Treasurer.

PLAIN STATEMENT OF FACTS

1. On July 26, 2011, Affiant registered for the Marion County Surplus Property Auction held by the Treasurer in the Public

Assembly Room of the City-County building.

2. According to the rules of the auction, winning bidders would receive the recorded quit claim deeds on or about August

16, 2011.

3. Affiant bid with the intent to purchase the Parcel located at 2715 Riverside Drive East Indianapolis, Indiana.

4. Affiant successfully bid and won the auction of the Parcel for $9200.

5. The Neighbor was the only other bidder on the Parcel.

6. Affiant tendered, to the Treasurer, two checks totaling $7500 leaving a balance of $1700 that had to be paid before 12

noon July 27, 2011.



7. Affiant received a receipt for the transaction which showed the amount paid and the remaining balance. A copy of that

receipt is included in this filing as EXIBIT A.

8. On July 27, 2011 Affiant tendered a check for $1700 to the Treasurer for the remaining balance. The Treasurer

stamped “PAID” and zeroed out the balance due on the Affiant’s receipt (EXIBIT A).

9. On or about August 24, 2011, Affiant had not received the deed to the Parcel and visited the Treasurer’s office to

inquire about the delay.

10. Lois B. Ziegler, Acting Surplus Property Coordinator, informed the Affiant that they were having a problem processing

everyone’s deeds from the auction and she would give him a call when they were processed.

11. On September 1, 2011, Affiant again visited the Treasurer’s office to inquire about the delay and was given a letter, by

Lois B. Ziegler, stating that he had RIGHT OF ENTRY to the Parcel and they were waiting for his deed to be recorded. A

copy of that letter is included in this filing as EXIBIT B.

12. On September 1, 2011 Affiant began making minor improvements and repairs on the Parcel since he had reason to

believe that he owned the Parcel and had a letter from the Treasurer stating that his deed was being recorded.

13. On September 9, 2011, at 8:11 a.m., Treasurer recorded the deed showing Affiant as owner of the Parcel. A copy of

the deed is included in this filing as EXIBIT C.

14. On September 9, 2011, at some time in the late afternoon, Damian called Affiant’s contact number and fraudulently

represented to Affiant’s family member that the Affiant’s checks were fraudulent.

15. On September 9, 2011, Affiant returned the call to Damian to inquire about his statements to Affiant’s family member

and was not told that the deed had not been recorded. Damian told Affiant the Treasurer did not have to and would

not provide evidence of dishonor pursuant IC 26-1-3.1-505 EVIDENCE OF DISHONOR which is a copy of U.C.C. § 3-505

EVIDENCE OF DISHONOR.

16. On September 12, 2011, Affiant visited the Treasurer’s office and hand delivered a letter directly to Damian requesting

proof of dishonor of his checks pursuant to IC 26-1-3.1-505 EVIDENCE OF DISHONOR. A copy of that letter is included

in this filing as EXIBIT D.

17. IC 26-1-3.1-505 and U.C.C. § 3-305 are as follows:

Evidence of dishonor - Sec. 505. (a) The following are admissible as evidence and create a presumption of dishonor and of any

notice of dishonor stated:

(1) A document regular in form as provided in subsection (b) which purports to be a protest.



(2) A purported stamp or writing of the drawee, payor bank, or presenting bank on or accompanying the

instrument stating that acceptance or payment has been refused unless reasons for the refusal are stated and

the reasons are not consistent with dishonor.

(3) A book or record of the drawee, payor bank, or collecting bank, kept in the usual course of business which

shows dishonor, even if there is no evidence of who made the entry.

(b) A protest is a certificate of dishonor made by a United States consul or vice consul, or a notary public or other person

authorized to administer oaths by the law of the place where dishonor occurs. It may be made upon information satisfactory to

that person. The protest must identify the instrument and certify either that presentment has been made or, if not made, the

reason why it was not made, and that the instrument has been dishonored by non-acceptance or nonpayment. The protest

may also certify that notice of dishonor has been given to some or all parties.

18. The letter also stated that the Treasurer had five days to respond with some evidence of dishonor of Affiant’s checks or

by sending the deed to the Parcel and that a lack of response would be construed as a tacit admission of fraud and that

any responses will only be accepted on paper and under penalty of perjury.

19. Treasurer did not respond to the Affiant in the allotted time period nor did Treasurer respond in any way to rebut the

statements in any reasonable period of time, therefore, the Treasurer did admit to fraud.

20. On September 20, 2011, Treasurer recorded an AFFIDAVIT AND NOTICE OF VOID QUIT CLAIM DEED (#201100084555)

which voided the Affiant’s deed recorded on September 9, 2011. A copy of the affidavit is included in this filing as

EXIBIT E.

21. In the affidavit, Treasurer, under oath and on public record fraudulently stated that Affiant did not tender proper

payment.

22. Treasurer’s statements are false due to the fact that Treasurer never presented Affiant with evidence of dishonor

pursuant to IC 26-1-3.1-505 as Affiant requested on September 12, 2011.

23. On November 1, 2011, Affiant received a deed to the Parcel that had been recorded on September 9, 2011. That was

the first response from the Respondents since the Affiant’s request on September 12, 2011. A copy of the envelope,

showing the postmark as 11/1/2011, is included in this filing as EXIBIT F.

24. The deed showed no evidence of being voided and came with no documentation showing that it was void.

25. Affiant had been constantly making repairs and improvements on the Parcel since he received the RIGHT OF ENTRY

letter on September 1, 2011.

26. On November 1, 2011, Affiant increased the repair activity on the Parcel since he believed that he had a valid deed.



27. On March 6, 2012, Affiant visited the Parcel to find the doors locked with an unknown deadbolt lock on the door.

28. Affiant left and returned with tools and a copy of his deed (EXIBIT C) and the RIGHT OF ENTRY LETTER (EXIBIT B) to post

and remove the unknown lock and retrieve the tools he had stored at the Parcel.

29. Upon hearing the Affiant removing the lock, the Neighbor came out and told the Affiant that he had bought the Parcel

from the Respondents on or about March 2, 2012 and he put the lock on the door.

30. The Neighbor showed the Affiant a copy of his check, receipt and a copy of the AFFIDAVIT AND NOTICE OF VOID QUIT

CLAIM DEED filed on September 20, 2011 (EXIBIT E).

31. The Neighbor stated that Respondents told him that Affiant’s checks were fraudulent and since he was the next

highest bidder, he could buy the Parcel.

32. Respondents gave Neighbor a phone number to call when Affiant showed up at the Parcel which turned out to be

Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department Dispatch.

33. The police arrived at the Parcel and looked at Affiant’s and Neighbor’s papers and informed them both that this

dispute was a civil matter to be taken up with the Treasurer.

34. On March 7, 2012 Affiant received a letter from the Commissioners addressed to the Affiant but to an address that the

Commissioners could not have known as the Affiant had not lived there for 6 years. A copy of that letter is included in

this filing as EXIBIT F.

35. The letter is signed by Damian and stated that Affiant has no rights to the Parcel and the COUNTY has voided his deed

due to his fraudulent payments.

36. Damian stated, in the letter, that he has told Affiant directly and over the phone that his payments were fraudulent in

September of 2011 as mentioned in Paragraphs 15-16.

37. The letter stated that Affiant will be considered trespassing if he is on the Parcel.

38. The letter shows that copies were sent to the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department, Marion County Sherriff’s

Department and Stephen Reeves.

39. The letter did not respond to the Affiant’s requests for evidence of dishonor on September 12, 2011 as shown in

Paragraph 15-19.



CAUSES OF ACTION

I. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 4 – MISPRISION OF FELONY

All Respondents had actual knowledge of the felonies being committed as all Respondents conspired to defraud the Affiant of the Parcel by recording the Affiant’s deed, withholding Affiant’s deed, voiding Affiant’s deed and sending the Affiant the voided deed that showed no indication of being void. This statement is demonstrated throughout the Plain Statement of Facts.

II. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 241 – CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS

All Respondents conspired to injure and intimidate Affiant in order to defraud him of the rightful ownership of the Parcel by voiding his deed and refusing to show him any evidence of dishonor. The Respondents sent the Affiant a fraudulent letter on March 7, 2012 that was the second communication the Affiant received since he made the request for evidence of dishonor. The first communication was the deed. This statement is demonstrated throughout the plain statement of facts.

III. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1001 - STATEMENTS OR ENTRIES GENERALLY

All Respondents knowingly and fraudulently represented to the Affiant that he owned the Parcel by making, and delivering to the Affiant a voided deed on November 1, 2011. The deed showed no evidence of being voided and came with no documentation of the voiding. This statement is demonstrated in Paragraphs 20-24.

IV. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1001 – STATEMENTS OR ENTRIES GENERALLY

Treasurer knowingly and willfully, on public record stated that the Affiant did not tender proper payment. The Treasurer’s statements are fraudulent due to the fact that none of the Respondents responded to the Affiant’s request for EVIDENCE OF DISHONOR in the allotted time or in any reasonable amount of time. This statement is demonstrated in Paragraphs 20-24.

V. FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1018-OFFICIAL CERTIFICATES OR WRITINGS Treasurer did knowingly make and record an official deed to the Parcel then void it and represent to the Affiant that the deed was valid by mailing the deed with no indications that it was void. This statement is demonstrated in Paragraphs 13, 20-24.

VI. SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1341-FRAUDS AND SWINDLES

Respondents devised a scheme to defraud the Affiant of the Parcel by using the U.S. POSTAL SERVICE to deliver the voided deed to the Affiant representing that it was valid. This statement is demonstrated in Paragraph 23.

VII. SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1341-FRAUDS AND SWINDLES

Commissioners devised a scheme and used the U.S. POSTAL SERVICE to deliver the letter from Damian fraudulently stating that Affiant had no rights to the Parcel and intimidating the Affiant by inferring that Affiant would be arrested for trespassing. Due



to the fact that none of the Respondents responded to the Affiant’s letter requesting evidence, all further responses from the Respondents constituted fraud as well as a scheme to defraud the Affiant. This statement is demonstrated in Paragraph 34.

VIII. EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION

VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1621-PERJURY GENERALLY On September 20, 2011 Treasurer did under oath of office and on public record fraudulently declare that the Affiant did not tender proper payment. Treasurer perjured himself because none of the Respondents responded to Affiant’s September 12, 2012 letter. Nor did the Respondents respond in any reasonable amount of time. The letter clearly stated that a lack of response or a lack of response in the allotted time period would be construed as a tacit admission of fraud. This statement is demonstrated in Paragraphs 16-24.

IX. NINETH CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1621-PERJURY GENERALLY

On September 20, 2011 Treasurer did knowingly under oath and in front of a notary make a false declaration on public record that the Affiant did not tender proper payment thereby making the sale void. Treasurer perjured himself because none of the Respondents responded to Affiant’s September 12, 2012 letter. Nor did the Respondents respond in any reasonable amount of time. The letter clearly stated that a lack of response or a lack of response in the allotted time period would be construed as a tacit admission of fraud. This statement is demonstrated in Paragraphs 16-24.

X. TENTH CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 USC § 1951 - INTERFERENCE WITH COMMERCE BY THREATS OR VIOLENCE

Respondents did knowingly and willfully conspire to interfere with and obstruct the commercial transaction between the Respondents and the Affiant. This statement is demonstrated throughout the PLAIN STATEMENT OF FACTS.

XI. ELEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1957- ENGAGING IN MONETARY TRANSACTIONS IN PROPERTY DERIVED FROM SPECIFIED UNLAWFUL ACTIVITY

The Respondents did unlawfully sell the parcel to Neighbor after illegally voiding the Affiant’s deed without notifying the Affiant. This statement is demonstrated throughout the PLAIN STATEMENT OF FACTS.

6. NOTICE is hereby given, and DEMANDS made, on all Respondents and any other involved Parties, that: a) ALL properties taken unlawfully, removed in violation of commerce, or otherwise converted, sold, or seized by the

Respondents, or other Parties in collusion therewith, be immediately returned IN FULL VALUE PLUS 100% to Noble

Wendell Brown-El, the Undersigned Affiant, justly possessing the lawful and legal title thereto; OR

b) All Parties who proceed to act or assist in said actions, against this Affiant, Noble Wendell Brown-El, without

thorough, verifiable, point-by point rebuttal of each and every point set forth in this Affidavit shall be immediately

charged with criminal fraud, theft, conspiracy against rights, theft and fraud, and commercial liens shall be placed

against all their real and personal properties for the GRAND TOTAL OF DAMAGES listed below in the ACCOUNTING

OF DAMAGES SUSTAINED(defined crimes TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 4 – MISPRISION OF FELONY, TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 241 –

CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS, TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1001 - STATEMENTS OR ENTRIES GENERALLY, TITLE 18 U.S.C. §

1018-OFFICIAL CERTIFICATES OR WRITINGS, TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1341-FRAUDS AND SWINDLES, TITLE 18 U.S.C. §



1621-PERJURY GENERALLY, TITLE 18 USC § 1951 - INTERFERENCE WITH COMMERCE BY THREATS OR VIOLENCE,

TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1957- ENGAGING IN MONETARY TRANSACTIONS IN PROPERTY DERIVED FROM SPECIFIED

UNLAWFUL ACTIVITY, IC-35-42-5-1-ROBBERY, IC-35-43-4-THEFT, CONVERSION AND RECEIVING STOLEN

PROPERTY, IC-35-43-5-FORGERY, FRAUD, AND OTHER DECEPTIONS).

7. THAT failure to respond as herein required to this Affiant, within the herein prescribed time of thirty (30) days will be

deemed by this Affiant to invoke the doctrine of acquiescence and admission, to recover, in commerce, the lost or

damaged properties plus damages listed below as ACCOUNTING OF DAMAGES SUSTAINED , penalties and costs.

8. THAT this Commercial Affidavit, Notice and Warning of Commercial Grace, is the ONE AND ONLY such Notice and

Warning. If the Respondents do not within thirty (30) days immediately return the Parcel along with the full cost of the

Parcel to the possession of the Affiant, it shall be considered a willful disregard for this Notice and Warning, and such

shall engender the immediate filing of Criminal Complaints (Affidavits of Information) and Commercial Liens (Affidavits

of Obligation) against all parties involved.

9. THAT the Respondents’ failure to honor the contracts between Affiant and Respondents, and this Affidavit or

response/rebuttal to said claims or charges, created the mutually voluntary, consensual, commercial, private contract

by and between the Undersigned and Respondents. Failure of Respondents to properly rebut the statements

contained herein within thirty (30) days (or in the alternative transfer possession of the Parcel to the Undersigned)

shall constitute deliberate criminal actions and willful breach of and default of the agreements made by and between

the Undersigned and the Respondents.



The specified penalty (civil) damages for crimes committed are listed on the TABLE OF CRIMES drawn from the civil penalties as

specified in the Criminal Codes. Undefined crimes (Constitutional violations not listed in the Criminal Code) are set by Title 18,

United States Criminal Code. Felonies are set at $250,000 for each officer or official. Accounting of damages are tallied as

follows:

ACCOUNTING OF DAMAGES SUSTAINED

a) VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 4 – MISPRISION OF FELONY $250,000

b) VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 241 – CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS $250,000

c) VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1001 - STATEMENTS OR ENTRIES GENERALLY $250,000

d) VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1001 - STATEMENTS OR ENTRIES GENERALLY $250,000

e) VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1018-OFFICIAL CERTIFICATES OR WRITINGS $250,000

f) VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1341-FRAUDS AND SWINDLES $250,000

g) VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1341-FRAUDS AND SWINDLES $250,000

h) VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1621-PERJURY GENERALLY $250,000

i) VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1621-PERJURY GENERALLY $250,000

j) VIOLATION OF 18 USC § 1951 - INTERFERENCE WITH COMMERCE BY THREATS

OR VIOLENCE $250,000

k) VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 1957- ENGAGING IN MONETARY TRANSACTIONS

FROM IN PROPERTY DERIVED FROM SPECIFIED UNLAWFUL ACTIVITY $250,000

l) VIOLATION OF IC-35-42-5-1-ROBBERY $250,000

m) VIOLATION OF IC-35-43-4-THEFT, CONVERSION AND RECEIVING STOLEN

PROPERTY $250,000

n) VOLATION OF IC-35-43-5-FORGERY, FRAUD, AND OTHER DECEPTIONS $250,000

------------------------- GRAND TOTAL OF DAMAGES $3,500,000



NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS.

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS.

THAT I, Noble Wendell Brown-El, the Undersigned Affiant, depose and certify that I have written for the forgoing with intent

and understanding of purpose, and believe the statements, allegations, demands and contends herein to be true, correct, and

complete, commercially reasonable, and just, to the best of my knowledge and belief.

__________________________________________

Noble Wendell Brown-El, in proper person, sui juris

EXPLANATION SHEET TO BE ATTACHED TO EVERY COMMERCIAL INSTRUMENT OF FILING BEARING THE U.S. S.E.C. TRACER FLAG CONTAINING THE PHRASE “A SECURITY-15USC” This EXPLANATION SHEET is to be attached to all Commercial Affidavits, including Affidavits of Obligation (Commercial Liens), which are non-judicial consensual processes which arise out of a breach of special performance. The notice as follows below is included for the purposes of FULL DISCLOSURE (UCC), and as a warning noted by the flag for commercial grace at the top of the instrument.

TRUTH AFFIDAVIT IN THE NATURE OF SUPPLEMENTAL RULES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND MARITIME CLAIMS RULES C(6)

AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE, DECLARATION, AND DEMAND

FAIR NOTICE AND WARNING OF COMMERCIAL GRACE

NOTICE OF NON-JUDICIAL PROCEEDING

THIS IS A U.S. S.E.C. TRACER FLAG, NOT A POINT OF LAW

A SECURITY (15 U.S.C.)

--------------------------

COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT

U.S. S.E.C. TRACR FLAG

NOT A POINT OF LAW



APPENDIX A THE Lien Claimant does NOT rely on Title 15 as a basis for the “Commercial Lien”. ALL Commercial processes, by using or relying on notes or paper in Commerce (e.g. Federal Reserve Notes), must bear some sort of Federal tracking code, a County Recorder’s number or a serial number, which process must be accessible for inspection at the nearest relevant County Recorder’s Office or be widely advertised. When a Lien matures in three (3) months, ninety (90) days, by default of the Lien Debtor through the Lien Debtors failure to rebut the AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION point-for-point categorically, it becomes an accounts receivable in the ordinary sense of a collectable debt upon which assignments, collateralization, and other commercial transactions can be based, hence becomes a Security subject to observation, tracking, and regulation by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (hereinafter U.S. S.E.C.). The notation “A Security-15 USC” is a flag in Commerce telling the U.S. S.E.C. that a speculation account is being established to enforce a lien. the U.S. S.E.C. can then monitor the process. As long as the process is truthful, open, and above-board(Full disclosure), the U.S. S.E.C. has no jurisdiction over it, for even the U.S. S.E.C. has no jurisdiction over the truth of testimony, depositions, affidavits, and affidavits of obligation(Commercial Liens), and an unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in Commerce. When a Affidavit is so flagged in Commerce, it becomes a Federal Document because it could become translated into a Security (for example by being attached in support of a Commercial Lien), and not accepting and/or filing a Commercial affidavit becomes a Federal Offense.

This instrument was prepared by Menes Ankh-El and I affirm under the penalties for perjury, that I have taken reasonable care to redact each social security number in this document, unless required by law. __________________________________________ Dated:____________________ Noble Wendell Brown-El, Affiant, in proper person, sui juris

Notice

Using a notary on this document does not constitute any adhesion, nor does it alter my status in any manner. The purpose for notary is verification and identification only and not for entrance into any foreign jurisdiction.

Jurat

Marion county ] ] ss: Indiana state ] Subscribed and affirmed before me this _______ day for the _____________________ month in the year, Two Thousand and Twelve, A.D. ______________________________________________ Notary Seal Address of Notary ________________________________ _______________________________________________ My Notary Expires _______________________



This is to certify that a copy of the forgoing has been served on the following person(s) on this ______ day of ____________________, 2012. MARION COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SUITE 1060 CITY COUNTY BUILDING 200 E. WASHINGTON ST. INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204 MARION COUNTY TREASURER’s OFFICE SUITE 1001 CITY COUNTY BUILDING 200 E. WASHINGTON ST. INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204 C. DAMIAN CORNACCHIONE SURPLUS PROPERTY DEPARTMENT MARION COUNTY TREASURER’S OFFICE SUITE 1060 CITY COUNTY BUILDING INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204 _____________________________________________ Noble Wendell Brown-El

Treasurer Truth Affidavit

Documents

Transcript of Treasurer Truth Affidavit