Trauma audit presentation

39

Transcript of Trauma audit presentation

Page 1: Trauma audit presentation
Page 2: Trauma audit presentation

The Rate of Normal findings Vs Abnormal findings in Trauma CT’s done at AAH: Do we

need to assess our current practice?

KEY PERFORMANCE AND QUALITY INDICATORS

22/08/2016AL Ain Hospital

Clinical Imaging InstituteCT Scan Department

By: Fathima Hasan MohamedSenior radiographer

Page 3: Trauma audit presentation

Introduction:

• Computed Tomography( CT ) is increasingly used in the evaluation of trauma patients. The use of CT in trauma has increased dramatically over the last two decades.

• The term “ Trauma CT” means CT of the brain to the mid-femurs ( face optional)

• Our facility uses a 64 slice scanner to perform Trauma CT procedures.

Page 4: Trauma audit presentation

Introduction

• An urgent Trauma CT is required for the rapid diagnosis of life threatening injury which requires prompt intervention.

• Literature shows that CT is an excellent tool to show specific anatomical injury and is excellent at showing vessel injury and active bleeding and its use has improved patient outcomes.

Page 5: Trauma audit presentation

Introduction

• Ionising radiation from CT can increase lifetime cancer risk, especially in the very young.

• CT exposes the patient to significant doses of radiation and concern arises about the possible biological effects of these cumulative radiation doses.

Page 6: Trauma audit presentation

Clinical Imaging Institute/CT section

Key Performance Indicator : The Rate of Normal findings Vs Abnormal findings in Trauma CT’s done

at our institute.Objectives: To analyze the number of normal findings from

Trauma CT done and show the impact on patient dose.Audit Plan: AnnuallyPlace of study: CT Scan Section/Clinical Imaging Institute/Al Ain

Hospital.Duration of study: 4 months of the year was chosen( every

quarter)

Sample size: 197 patients were evaluated in this study.

Page 7: Trauma audit presentation

Method

• Patients who had Trauma CT were identified through the Cerner online worklist and clinical history and reports through PACS.

• Data was compiled in excel format.(see excel sheet) and descriptive analysis was performed.

• Study was focused on adult male and female patients < 35years and children < 12 years.

• Our organization uses a 64 slice scanner to perform Trauma CT.

Page 8: Trauma audit presentation
Page 9: Trauma audit presentation
Page 10: Trauma audit presentation
Page 11: Trauma audit presentation
Page 12: Trauma audit presentation

Data Analysis & Result :

Page 13: Trauma audit presentation

Data Analysis & Result :

Page 14: Trauma audit presentation

Data Analysis & Result :

• Percentage(%)• 55% = men< 35 years• 8%= women<35 years• 6.5%= children

Page 15: Trauma audit presentation

Data Analysis & Result :

Page 16: Trauma audit presentation

Discussion

• The aim of this clinical audit was to describe that the greater percentage of Trauma CT’s ordered by ER physicians are normal and to identify gaps to reduce these large amounts of radiation exposure to patients.

• This is the first clinical audit from CT and although we focused on just 4 months, the findings are still useful to improve service delivery at our hospital.

Page 17: Trauma audit presentation

Discussion

• Ionising radiation exposure:• Benefit to the patient must outweigh the risk

with increased radiation exposure from CT compared tp conventional radiography.

• Lifetime potential cancer risk may be significant especially in young patients.

• Is the benefit of of the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body CT worth the potential risk?

Page 18: Trauma audit presentation

Discussion:

Page 19: Trauma audit presentation

INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION

——————————————————————————————————————

 

What is the dose from CT? How high?

The effective dose in chest CT is in the order of 8 mSv (around 400 times more than chest radiograph dose) and in some CT examinations like that of pelvic region, it may be around 20 mSv

The absorbed dose to tissues from CT can often approach or exceed the levels known to increase the probability of cancer as shown in epidemiological studies

Page 20: Trauma audit presentation

Discussion

• Organ doses in CT• Breast dose in thorax CT may be as much as

30-50 mGy, even though breasts are not the target of imaging procedure.

• Eye lens dose in brain CT, thyroid in brain or in thorax CT and gonads in pelvic CT receive high doses

Page 21: Trauma audit presentation

INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION

——————————————————————————————————————

 

Tissues in the field although they are not the area of interest for the procedure

Lens of the eye Breast tissue

Page 22: Trauma audit presentation

Discussion

• Radiation exposure to the abdomen and pelvis is most significant when calculating whole-body effective radiation dose.

• Exposure to thyroid, breast and gonads carry a relatively high potential cancer risk.

• Therefore consideration of the need for whole-body CT is essential to prevent unnecessary harm.

Page 23: Trauma audit presentation

Discussion: Dose report

Page 24: Trauma audit presentation

Discussion:

• CT dose index ( CTDI )- represents the dose in a single slice.

• Dose report displays the dose length product ( DLP ) index, which represents the integrated radiation dose for a specific CT examination. The DLP is then multiplied by conversion factors for different areas of the body to determine the effective dose in millisieverts to the entire body.

Page 25: Trauma audit presentation

Recommendations

• For ordering of Trauma CT, decision guidelines should be put in place and followed- 20-40% of CT’s can be avoided.

• Trauma CT should not replace careful clinical examination and should only be used only in appropriate patients (severely injured).

Page 26: Trauma audit presentation

INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION

——————————————————————————————————————

 

Actions for physician & radiologist…

• Justification: Ensure that patients are not irradiated unjustifiably.

• The physician is responsible for weighing the benefits against risks.

• Physicians need to understand the radiation doses of imaging modalities.

• Clinical guidelines advising which examinations are appropriate and acceptable should be available to clinicians and radiologists.

• Clinician has the responsibility to thoroughly communicate information on patient condition to the radiologist.

Page 27: Trauma audit presentation

What can we do in Clinical Imaging Institute?

• Be more proactive: Need to involve non-imagers- training on

radiation dose and possible risks. Need to educate all involved in the management of the trauma patient.

Control- SAY NO!Engage our community- patient information

leaflets.

Page 28: Trauma audit presentation

Recommendations• Trauma CT workflow:Trauma management from two centers in UAE:

Rashid Hospital (Dubai) - poly-trauma patient received in A/E go throw a series of steps:• 1- Initial screening and physical examinations in resuscitation unit. • 2- Full body scan using a Statscan (Lodox) machine will performed on the patient in resuscitation

unit.• 3- Statscan (Lodox) protocol includes: • · AP full Body (from head to toe) • · Lateral Head and Cervical Spine • · Lateral Full Spine • 4- After the initial management, Patient will be sent to CT unit. • 5- CT scan poly-trauma protocol will be performed, including:• · CT Brain, Face and Cervical Spine • · CT Chest, Abdomen, Pelvis, Dorsal and Lumber • 6- Patient will then sent back to resuscitation to complete his treatment •

Page 29: Trauma audit presentation

Statscan machine (Lodox Systems)

Page 30: Trauma audit presentation

Statscan Images

Page 31: Trauma audit presentation

Recommendations

• Tawam Hospital – Multitrauma CT policy:• Indications for Trauma CT:1. High energy trauma with clinical suspicion of

severe internal injury.2. Any significant history with a Revised Trauma

Score of 10 or less on arrival in ED.

Page 32: Trauma audit presentation

Recommendations

• Contraindications for immediate Trauma CT1. Hemodynamic instability.

2. Un-resuscitated patient.

3. Airway is not safe.

4. Low oxygen saturation.

Page 33: Trauma audit presentation

Recommendations

• Prior to performing a Trauma CT:

• Do x-ray of chest (supine in ED).

Page 34: Trauma audit presentation

Recommendations

Page 35: Trauma audit presentation

Conclusions

• We should evaluate our current practice that if a trauma patient’s GCS is 14 or 15/15 and the patient is stable( BP, Pulse and respiration), do we really need to subject the patient to Trauma CT? The patient may have had a trauma which is trivial and not high energy.

• Is it not better to wait and observe these patients and subject to Trauma CT if needed?

• Do we need to revisit our protocol for the ordering of Trauma CT examinations?

Page 36: Trauma audit presentation

Acknowlegements:

• CT Radiographers: Pulapadi Somanathan, Monir Khan, Illyn Bregonia.

• Radiology Manager: Mr Anthony Bedson for his continuous support.

Page 37: Trauma audit presentation

References:

Page 38: Trauma audit presentation

INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION

——————————————————————————————————————

 

Web sites for additional information on radiation sources and effects

• European Commission (radiological protection pages): europa.eu.int/comm/environment/radprot

• International Atomic Energy Agency: www.iaea.org

• International Commission on Radiological Protection: www.icrp.org

• United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: www.unscear.org

• World Health Organization: www.who.int

Page 39: Trauma audit presentation

Further References:

• Control of patient dose- Al Ain Hospital policy manager.