Transportation Utility Fee (TUF)...
Transcript of Transportation Utility Fee (TUF)...
Transportation Utility Fee (TUF) Update Transportation Committee– December 2014
Overview
• TUF Program Accomplishments• TUF Program Accomplishments
• TUF Program Needs
• TUF Fund Performance
• Potential Program Modifications
• Next Steps
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Program Accomplishments
Bicycle & Pedestrian Capital Improvement (BPCIP) ‐ NE 37th Avenue
• Main to Brogden
• Street improvement including curb streetincluding, curb, street trees, street lighting, storm sewer, and water upgradesupgrades.
• Estimated Total Cost: $1.55 Million
• Budgeted TUF: $750,000
• CompletedCompleted
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Program AccomplishmentsAdditional BPCIP
• SE Spruce St Sidewalk Infill – 13th to 21stSE Spruce St Sidewalk Infill 13 to 21
• Completed 2010
AfterBefore
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Program AccomplishmentsAdditional BPCIP
• SE 18th Ave Improvement – Maple to WalnutSE 18th Ave Improvement Maple to Walnut
• Completed 2011
AfterBefore
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Program AccomplishmentsADA Ramp Installation & Upgrades
• Federal requirement to install ramps where sidewalks exist andFederal requirement to install ramps where sidewalks exist and no ramp is present and bring all other ramps to current standard.
• City must also bring all ramps up to current standards when• City must also bring all ramps up to current standards when streets are overlaid or micro sealed.
AfterBefore ‐ Non Standard Before‐No Ramp
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Program Accomplishments
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Program Accomplishments
Pavement Management Program (PMP)‐New Technologies
• Introduced Micro Sealing 2009
– Reduced deferrals by $2.5 Million the first year.• Testing Fiber Reinforced Slurry Seal
– Applied first tests in 2012
– Potential to improve reflective cracking from underlying asphalt.Potential to improve reflective cracking from underlying asphalt.
• Testing Fiber Reinforced Asphalt– Applied first tests in 2013
– Potential to allow reduction in asphalt thickness.
– Potential to improve resistance to reflective cracking from older asphalt
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Program Accomplishments
90%
100%
Condition by Centerline Miles
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Net
wor
k
20%
30%
40%
50%
Perc
enta
ge o
f
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014EXCELLENT (86 TO 100) 93.47 95.34 100.79 107.72 121.34 117.69 121.45 127.46 128.92 125.20VERY GOOD (71 TO 85) 66.03 63.82 62.26 59.16 59.63 60.72 56.35 54.44 56.14 59.04GOOD (56 TO 70) 22 41 26 94 26 10 24 91 18 51 23 87 24 74 22 93 18 63 18 54
0%
10%
GOOD (56 TO 70) 22.41 26.94 26.10 24.91 18.51 23.87 24.74 22.93 18.63 18.54FAIR (41 TO 55) 10.10 11.43 10.02 11.52 8.76 7.82 9.52 8.09 13.03 11.44POOR (26 TO 40) 5.73 5.73 6.54 4.73 3.52 3.46 2.36 2.08 1.20 2.61VERY POOR (11 TO 25) 4.12 4.71 4.34 4.02 3.16 2.04 1.78 1.39 1.47 2.04FAILED (1 TO 10) 0.82 0.60 0.88 0.84 0.65 0.42 0.16 0.10 0.15 0.37UNRATED* 9.23 5.51 5.95 6.83 4.78 5.71 5.42 6.11 4.71 5.04
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Year
Program Accomplishments
$3,500,000
$4,000,000 Funding by Maintenance Type
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$500,000
$1,000,000
FY 03‐04 FY 04‐05 FY 05‐06 FY 06‐07 FY 07‐08 FY 08‐09 FY 09‐10 FY 10‐11 FY 11‐12 FY 12‐13 FY 13‐14 FY 14‐15
Remaining Expenditures $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $1,292,238
Rehabilitation $605,529 $413,544 $1,628,695 $1,194,687 $1,213,714 $1,249,216 $476,696 $523,424 $1,146,268 $1,797,902 $2,479,919 $1,554,803
Preventative $208 992 $118 361 $486 878 $410 295 $317 031 $354 826 $493 027 $702 128 $672 109 $1 075 149 $971 631 $726 459
$‐
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
*FY 14‐15 Expenditures to date. $1.1 Million of expenditures of rehabilitation still planned for reconstruction of Griffin Oaks. Possible Crack Seal & AC Replacement contract.
Preventative $208,992 $118,361 $486,878 $410,295 $317,031 $354,826 $493,027 $702,128 $672,109 $1,075,149 $971,631 $726,459
Program Accomplishments
Maintenance History (Centerline miles treated)
2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15
Crack Seals 42.7 35.2 28.3 19.7 0
Slurry Seal 10.0 14.5 7.1 7.1 7.5y
Micro‐Surfacing 2.2 4.6 4.9 3.8 4.5
AC Replacements 6.4 1.9 3.4 1.5 0
Subtotal Preventative Maintenance 12.2 53.7 51.6 43.6 32.1 12
Overlay 1.3 3.9 3.9 2.6 2.4
PCC Reconstruction 0.10.4
Pending
Subtotal Rehabilitative Maintenance 1 3 3 9 3 9 2 72.8
(w/Pending)Subtotal Rehabilitative Maintenance 1.3 3.9 3.9 2.7 (w/Pending)
Total 12.2 55.0 55.5 47.5 34.814.8
(w/pending)
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Program Accomplishments
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
PMP Deferrals
$11 762
$14,000 Annual Deferrals
$9,062
$10,020
$8 503$9,374
$11,762
$9,615 $10,000
$12,000
s
$6,443 $6,718 $6,704
$8,214 $8,503
$6,000
$8,000
Thou
sand
s
$
$4,000
T
$‐
$2,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Year
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Year
Historical Treatment Costs
2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 Percent Change*
Crack Seals (per LF) $ 0.42 $ 0.62 $ 0.62 $ 0.59 + 40%
Slurry Seal (per Sq. Yd.) $ 1.20 $ 1.54 $ 2.09 $ 1.61 $ 1.51 + 26%
Micro‐Surfacing (per Sq. Yd.) $ 4.38 $ 4.50 $ 4.60 $ 4.48 $ 5.27 + 20%
AC Replacements (per Sq. Yd.) $ 27.92 $ 26.50 $ 30.57 $ 35.12 $ 42.77 + 53%
Overlay (per Sq Yd ) $ 15 73 $ 16 59 $ 21 23 $ 31 03 $ 26 04 + 66%Overlay (per Sq. Yd.) $ 15.73 $ 16.59 $ 21.23 $ 31.03 $ 26.04 + 66%
*Percentage change is from earliest year of data to last year of data.
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Program Needs – ADA Improvements
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Program Needs ‐ Sidewalks
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Program Needs ‐ PMP
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Program Needs ‐ PMP
$14,000,000
PMP Historical & Projected Deferrals‐10 Years
HISTORICAL
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
HISTORICAL
$3.4M
$3.6M
$3.8M
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
*All funding scenarios assume that revenues are increased 6% annually
$‐
$ , ,
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
All funding scenarios assume that revenues are increased 6% annually.
TUF Fund PerformanceFY 2009‐10 FY 2010‐11 FY 2011‐12 FY 2012‐13 FY 2013‐14 FY 2014‐2015*
TUF PMP $874,070 $848,349 $904,830 $932,098 $944,877 $1,008,376
$ $ $ $ $ $TUF BPCIP $882,876 $749,575 $771,068 $784,213 $803,404 $850,025
Total $1,756,945 $1,597,924 $1,675,897 $1,716,311 $1,748,281 $1,858,401
• TUF rates have been adjusted 3 times– FY 2009‐10: Reduced multifamily rates.
– FY 2010‐11: Re‐allocated in accordance with TUF MethodologyFY 2010 11: Re allocated in accordance with TUF Methodology (revenue neutral).
– FY 2011‐12: Increased rates to generate 4% increase in TUF PMP.
No changes have been made to TUF BPCIP rates– No changes have been made to TUF BPCIP rates.
• Currently collect ~10% more in TUF PMP than at adoption.
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
*FY 2014‐15Projected Year End
TUF Fund Performance
TUF Administration Costs
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
TUF Fund Performance $1,756,945.00 $1,597,924.00 $1,675,897.00 $1,716,311.00 $1,748,281.00
4% Maximum Administration $70,277.80 $63,916.96 $67,035.88 $68,652.44 $69,931.24
Actual Administration Charges $23 562 08 $42 123 99 $29 500 29 $8 193 40 $19 666 74Actual Administration Charges $23,562.08 $42,123.99 $29,500.29 $8,193.40 $19,666.74
Actual Adminstration Percentage 1.3% 2.6% 1.8% 0.5% 1.1%
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Discounts & Waivers
Residential Programs
• Waivers: – Vacancy : TUF suspended if water service suspended.
– Unemployment : 6 month waiver when someone in household has been recentlyUnemployment : 6 month waiver when someone in household has been recently laid off.
– Hardship: One year waiver for residents whose income is below 60% of the median
Oregon income Annual AnnualOregon income. Number in Family
Annual Poverty Income
Annual Median Income
60% Median‐Annual
60% Median ‐Monthly
1 $ 11,490 $ 42,500 $ 25,500 $ 2,125 2 $ 15,510 $ 48,600 $ 29,160 $ 2,430 3 $ 19 530 $ 54 600 $ 32 760 $ 2 7303 $ 19,530 $ 54,600 $ 32,760 $ 2,730 4 $ 23,550 $ 60,700 $ 36,420 $ 3,035 5 $ 27,570 $ 65,600 $ 39,360 $ 3,280 6 $ 31,590 $ 70,400 $ 42,240 $ 3,520 7 $ 35,610 $ 75,300 $ 45,180 $ 3,765 8 $ 39 630 $ 80 100 $ 48 060 $ 4 005
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
8 $ 39,630 $ 80,100 $ 48,060 $ 4,005
Discounts & Waivers
Residential Programs
• Discounts: – Motor Vehicle: 30 % discount for residents who don’t own a vehicle.
– Transit : 30% discount for residents who have purchased and annual TriMet pass.Transit : 30% discount for residents who have purchased and annual TriMet pass.
• Only one discount or waiver is applied at a time.
• All discounts and waivers are renewable.
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Discounts & Waivers
Non‐Residential Programs
• Vacancy Waiver: TUF is suspended when water service is suspended.
• Transit Discount: Up to a 30% discount for employers that purchase TriMet passes for their employeesTriMet passes for their employees.
• DEQ/Eco Discount: discount for employers that have an approved commute option program. Discount is equal to the trip reduction d d b h fdemonstrated by the program up to a maximum of 30%.
• Discount programs for Non‐Residential may be combined up to a maximum of 30% and renewed annually.
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Discounts & Waivers
$
$35,000
$40,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
EMPLOYER DEQ/ECO DISCOUNT $84 $657 $572 $‐ $‐ $‐
EMPLOYER TRANSIT DISCOUNT $1,955 $10,455 $2,001 $168 $‐ $‐
$‐
$5,000
RES TUF TRANSIT DISCOUNT $64 $246 $333 $463 $638 $636
RES TUF MOTOR VEHICLE DISCOUNT $6 $73 $30 $23 $23 $23
RES UNEMPLOYMENT WAIVER $434 $1,848 $689 $321 $280 $159
RES HARDSHIP WAIVER $2,821 $21,048 $13,309 $10,876 $9,944 $7,433
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Discounts & Waivers
Forgone Revenue & Associated Administrative Costs
$30 000
$35,000
$40,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$10,000
$15,000
FY 2008‐09 FY 2009‐10 FY 2010‐11 FY 2011‐12 FY 2012‐13 FY 2013‐14
Discounts and Waivers Annual Credits $7,372 $36,209 $18,820 $13,863 $12,898 $10,265
$‐
$5,000
$ , $ , $ , $ , $ , $ ,
Discounts & Waivers PW Admin Costs $63 $6,940 $8,572 $7,155 $5,515 $2,816
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Funding Forecast
$6,000,000
$3.6 Million Annual Contract(with 6% annual revenue increase)
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$
$3,000,000
$ , ,
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Shortfall $489,464 $1,379,253 $1,581,999 $1,795,427 $2,023,315
SIP $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Transportation Fund $1,200,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000
$‐
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
TUF PMP $1,008,376 $1,028,544 $1,049,114 $1,070,097 $1,091,499
Proposed Changes
Residential/Non‐Residential Share ‐ Existing
• Currently 52% Residential/48% Non Residential• Currently 52% Residential/48% Non Residential– Based on Metro determination of residential, commercial, and
industrial use of collectors and arterials.
N d f l l d i hb h d hi h f h– No data for local and neighborhood routes which account for the majority of Hillsboro’s network.
– Doesn’t differentiate between local streets that are residential d l l h i l i d i land local streets that are commercial or industrial.
– Doesn’t account for alleys.
Cl ifi ti L Mil R id ti l C i l I d t i l P bliClassification Lane Miles Residential Commercial Industrial Public
Arterials 17.23 45% 35% 15% 5%
Collectors 125.16 50% 30% 15% 5%
Local/Neighborhood Routes 324.38 60% 25% 10% 5%
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Proposed Changes
Residential/Non Residential Share Proposed
• Split share of arterials, collectors, neighborhood routes 50/50. Maintenance Shareroutes 50/50.
• Assign local commercial & industrial streets to non residential
Classification Residential Non ResidentialArterials 50% 50%Collectors 50% 50%Neigborhood Routes 50% 50%Local Commerical/Industrial Streets 0% 100%
non‐residential customers.
• Assign local residential
Local Residential Streets 100% 0%Alleys 100% 0%
streets and alleys to residential customers.
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Proposed Changes
Residential/Non Residential Share ‐ Proposed
• 75% Residential/25 % Non‐Residential
Maintenance Share Lane Mile Share
Classification
Maintenance Share
Total Lane Miles
Lane Mile Share
Residential Non Residential Residential Non ResidentialArterials 50% 50% 17.65 8.83 8.83Collectors 50% 50% 130.54 65.27 65.27Neigborhood Routes 50% 50% 50 37 25 19 25 19Neigborhood Routes 50% 50% 50.37 25.19 25.19Local Commerical/Industrial Streets 0% 100% 19.38 0.00 19.38Local Residential Streets 100% 0% 243.23 243.23 0.00Alleys 100% 0% 7.37 7.37 0.00Total 468.54 349.88 118.66
74 7% 25 3%74.7% 25.3%
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Proposed Rate Change – Scenario ACURRENT 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020
RATESNON RESIDENTIAL
NON RESIDENTIAL‐1 $ 0.21 $ 0.22 $ 0.24 $ 0.25 $ 0.27 $ 0.28 NON RESIDENTIAL‐2 $ 0.49 $ 0.52 $ 0.55 $ 0.58 $ 0.62 $ 0.66 NON RESIDENTIAL‐3 $ 1 63 $ 1 73 $ 1 83 $ 1 94 $ 2 06 $ 2 18NON RESIDENTIAL‐3 $ 1.63 $ 1.73 $ 1.83 $ 1.94 $ 2.06 $ 2.18 NON RESIDENTIAL‐4 $ 3.64 $ 3.86 $ 4.09 $ 4.34 $ 4.60 $ 4.87 NON RESIDENTIAL‐5 $ 9.58 $ 10.15 $ 10.76 $ 11.41 $ 12.09 $ 12.82 NON RESIDENTIAL‐6 $ 19.42 $ 20.59 $ 21.82 $ 23.13 $ 24.52 $ 25.99 NON RESIDENTIAL‐7 $ 0.04 $ 0.04 $ 0.04 $ 0.05 $ 0.05 $ 0.05
NON RESIDENTIAL BASE CHARGE $ 2.87 $ 4.50 $ 4.77 $ 5.05 $ 5.36 $ 5.68 RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL‐8 $ 3.18 $ 5.00 $ 5.30 $ 5.61 $ 5.95 $ 6.31 MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL‐9 $ 2.87 $ 4.50 $ 4.77 $ 5.05 $ 5.36 $ 5.68
ANNUAL REVENUEBPCIP (ALL FROM RESIDENTIAL) $ 818,132 $ 817,324 $ 866,363 $ 918,345 $ 973,446 $ 1,031,852
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP) NON RESIDENTIAL PMP $ 484,020 $ 499,212 $ 529,165 $ 560,915 $ 594,570 $ 630,244 RESIDENTIAL PMP $ 524,356 $ 1,238,403 $ 1,312,707 $ 1,391,470 $ 1,474,958 $ 1,563,455
TOTAL PMP $ 1,008,376 $ 1,737,615 $ 1,841,872 $ 1,952,385 $ 2,069,528 $ 2,193,699
PMP NEEDS PMP NEED (ADMINISTRATION & CONTRACT) $ 3,697,840 $ 3,907,797 $ 4,130,113 $ 4,365,524 $ 4,614,814 $ 4,878,806
‐CARRY OVER/RESERVES $ 489,464‐TUF PMP $ 1,008,376 $ 1,737,615 $ 1,841,872 $ 1,952,385 $ 2,069,528 $ 2,193,699
SHORTFALL W/O OTHER FUNDS $ 2,200,000 $ 2,170,182 $ 2,288,241 $ 2,413,139 $ 2,545,286 $ 2,685,107 ‐TRANSPORTATION FUND (GAS TAX/OTIA) $ 1,200,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000
SHORTFALL AFTER TRANSPORTATION $ 1,000,000 $ 1,670,182 $ 1,788,241 $ 1,913,139 $ 2,045,286 $ 2,185,107 W/$1 M FROM BUDGETED SIP
SHORTFALL AFTER TRANSPORTATION FUND $ 1,000,000 $ 1,670,182 $ 1,788,241 $ 1,913,139 $ 2,045,286 $ 2,185,107 ‐SIP $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
SHORTFALL $ 0 $ 670,182 $ 788,241 $ 913,139 $ 1,045,286 $ 1,185,107
Proposed Rate Change – Scenario A
436450
500 Non Residential Customers Monthly Bill Change – 1st Year
436
364
350
400
450
250
300
tomer Cou
nt
138
77 100
150
200
Cust
‐
60
23 10 14 8
32
7 1 ‐ ‐ 1 ‐‐
50
$0.00 ‐$1
$1.01 ‐$2
$2.01 ‐$3
$3.01 ‐$4
$4.01 ‐$5
$5.01 ‐$6
$6.01 ‐$7
$7.01 ‐$8
$8.01 ‐$9
$9.01 ‐$10
$20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $80.00
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
$1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9 $10
Proposed Rate Change – Scenario BCURRENT 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020
RATESNON RESIDENTIAL
NON RESIDENTIAL‐1 $ 0.21 $ 0.24 $ 0.27 $ 0.29 $ 0.31 $ 0.34 NON RESIDENTIAL‐2 $ 0.49 $ 0.56 $ 0.63 $ 0.70 $ 0.76 $ 0.82 NON RESIDENTIAL 3 $ 1 63 $ 1 94 $ 2 25 $ 2 55 $ 2 77 $ 3 01NON RESIDENTIAL‐3 $ 1.63 $ 1.94 $ 2.25 $ 2.55 $ 2.77 $ 3.01 NON RESIDENTIAL‐4 $ 3.64 $ 4.14 $ 4.64 $ 5.13 $ 5.58 $ 6.06 NON RESIDENTIAL‐5 $ 9.58 $ 10.88 $ 12.18 $ 13.46 $ 14.65 $ 15.91 NON RESIDENTIAL‐6 $ 19.42 $ 24.19 $ 28.96 $ 33.72 $ 36.70 $ 39.86 NON RESIDENTIAL‐7 $ 0.04 $ 0.05 $ 0.06 $ 0.07 $ 0.07 $ 0.08
NON RESIDENTIAL BASE CHARGE $ 2.87 $ 4.18 $ 5.49 $ 6.81 $ 7.34 $ 7.91 RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL‐8 $ 3.18 $ 4.64 $ 6.10 $ 7.56 $ 8.16 $ 8.79 MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL‐9 $ 2.87 $ 4.18 $ 5.49 $ 6.81 $ 7.34 $ 7.91
ANNUAL REVENUEBPCIP (ALL FROM RESIDENTIAL) $ 818,132 $ 865,169 $ 912,206 $ 962,309 $ 1,020,047 $ 1,081,250
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP) NON RESIDENTIAL PMP $ 484,020 $ 541,757 $ 632,024 $ 716,381 $ 778,704 $ 844,702NON RESIDENTIAL PMP $ 484,020 $ 541,757 $ 632,024 $ 716,381 $ 778,704 $ 844,702 RESIDENTIAL PMP $ 524,356 $ 1,041,853 $ 1,650,908 $ 2,149,143 $ 2,336,111 $ 2,534,105
TOTAL PMP $ 1,008,376 $ 1,583,610 $ 2,282,932 $ 2,865,524 $ 3,114,814 $ 3,378,806
PMP NEEDS PMP NEED (ADMINISTRATION & CONTRACT) $ 3,697,840 $ 3,907,797 $ 4,130,113 $ 4,365,524 $ 4,614,814 $ 4,878,806
‐CARRY OVER/RESERVES $ 489,464‐TUF PMP $ 1 008 376 $ 1 583 610 $ 2 282 932 $ 2 865 524 $ 3 114 814 $ 3 378 806‐TUF PMP $ 1,008,376 $ 1,583,610 $ 2,282,932 $ 2,865,524 $ 3,114,814 $ 3,378,806
SHORTFALL W/O OTHER FUNDS $ 2,200,000 $ 2,324,187 $ 1,847,181 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 ‐TRANSPORTATION FUND $ 1,200,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000
SHORTFALL AFTER TRANSPORTATION $ 1,000,000 $ 1,824,187 $ 1,347,181 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 W/$1 M FROM BUDGETED SIP
SHORTFALL AFTER TRANSPORTATION FUND $ 1,000,000 $ 1,824,187 $ 1,347,181 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 SIP $ 1 000 000 $ 1 000 000 $ 1 000 000 $ 1 000 000 $ 1 000 000 $ 1 000 000
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
‐SIP $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 SHORTFALL $ 0 $ 824,187 $ 347,181 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
Proposed Rate Change – Scenario B400
Non‐Residential Customer Monthly Bill Change – First Year
335
253
300
350
253
200
250
stom
er Cou
nt
124
82 77
119
100
150
Cus
‐
77
40
25 37
22 27 17
7 7 3 1 ‐ 1 1 ‐
50
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
$0.00 ‐$1
$1.01 ‐$2
$2.01 ‐$3
$3.01 ‐$4
$4.01 ‐$5
$5.01 ‐$6
$6.01 ‐$7
$7.01 ‐$8
$8.01 ‐$9
$9.01 ‐$10
$20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 $100.00 $200.00
Proposed Rate Change – Scenario B1CURRENT 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020
RATESNON RESIDENTIAL
NON RESIDENTIAL‐1 $ 0.21 $ 0.27 $ 0.33 $ 0.39 $ 0.42 $ 0.45 NON RESIDENTIAL‐2 $ 0.49 $ 0.64 $ 0.79 $ 0.95 $ 1.01 $ 1.08 NON RESIDENTIAL 3 $ 1 63 $ 2 25 $ 2 86 $ 3 48 $ 3 70 $ 3 94NON RESIDENTIAL‐3 $ 1.63 $ 2.25 $ 2.86 $ 3.48 $ 3.70 $ 3.94 NON RESIDENTIAL‐4 $ 3.64 $ 4.76 $ 5.88 $ 7.01 $ 7.46 $ 7.94 NON RESIDENTIAL‐5 $ 9.58 $ 12.52 $ 15.46 $ 18.40 $ 19.59 $ 20.85 NON RESIDENTIAL‐6 $ 19.42 $ 28.31 $ 37.20 $ 46.08 $ 49.06 $ 52.21 NON RESIDENTIAL‐7 $ 0.04 $ 0.06 $ 0.08 $ 0.09 $ 0.10 $ 0.10
NON RESIDENTIAL BASE CHARGE $ 2.87 $ 4.72 $ 6.57 $ 8.42 $ 8.96 $ 9.52 RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL‐8 $ 3.18 $ 5.24 $ 7.30 $ 9.36 $ 9.95 $ 10.58 MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL‐9 $ 2.87 $ 4.72 $ 6.57 $ 8.42 $ 8.96 $ 9.52
ANNUAL REVENUEBPCIP (ALL FROM RESIDENTIAL) $ 818,132 $ 835,229 $ 901,914 $ 950,732 $ 1,007,775 $ 1,068,242
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP) NON RESIDENTIAL PMP $ 484,020 $ 623,979 $ 795,525 $ 966,381 $ 1,028,704 $ 1,094,702 $ , $ , $ , $ , $ , , $ , ,RESIDENTIAL PMP $ 524,356 $ 1,292,987 $ 2,094,466 $ 2,899,143 $ 3,086,111 $ 3,284,105
TOTAL PMP $ 1,008,376 $ 1,916,966 $ 2,889,990 $ 3,865,524 $ 4,114,814 $ 4,378,806
PMP NEEDS PMP NEED (ADMINISTRATION & CONTRACT) $ 3,697,840 $ 3,907,797 $ 4,130,113 $ 4,365,524 $ 4,614,814 $ 4,878,806
‐CARRY OVER/RESERVES $ 489,464‐TUF PMP $ 1 008 376 $ 1 916 966 $ 2 889 990 $ 3 865 524 $ 4 114 814 $ 4 378 806TUF PMP $ 1,008,376 $ 1,916,966 $ 2,889,990 $ 3,865,524 $ 4,114,814 $ 4,378,806
SHORTFALL W/O OTHER FUNDS $ 2,200,000 $ 1,990,831 $ 1,240,123 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 ‐TRANSPORTATION FUND $ 1,200,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000
SHORTFALL AFTER TRANSPORTATION $ 1,000,000 $ 1,490,831 $ 740,123 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐W/NO CITY CONTRIBUTIONS
SHORTFALL AFTER TRANSPORTATION FUND $ 1,000,000 $ 1,490,831 $ 740,123 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐‐SIP $ 1 000 000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
SIP $ 1,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ SHORTFALL $ 0 $ 1,490,831 $ 740,123 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
Proposed Rate Change – Scenario B1
252
300 Non‐Residential Customer Monthly Bill Change – First Year
252
185 200
250
162
118
150
Custom
er Cou
nt
76
54 47
72
44 50
100
‐
32 34 36
20
7 4 10 7 3
12
‐ 1 ‐
50
$0.00 ‐$1
$1.01 ‐$2
$2.01 ‐$3
$3.01 ‐$4
$4.01 ‐$5
$5.01 ‐$6
$6.01 ‐$7
$7.01 ‐$8
$8.01 ‐$9
$9.01 ‐$10
$20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 $100.00 $200.00 $300.00 $400.00
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Rate Comparison
CITY
PSU 2013 CertifiedPopulation Estimates
CENTERLANE MILES
MAINTAINED SFR MFR
100000 SQ.FT.
MANUFACTURING
30,000 GENERAL OFFICE
BUILDING
20,000 SPECIALTY
RETAIL 100,000 SUPER
MARKET
10,000 DRIVE IN
BANK
5000 FAST FOOD
RESTAURANT W/DT
North Plains 2,015 14.21 $ 0.90 $ 0.90 $ 450.00 $ 135.00 $ 450.00 $ 1,350.00 NA $ 162.00
C lli 55 345 187 00 $ 1 36 $ 0 94 $ 8 02 $ 6 94 $ 18 61 $ 214 70 $ 51 76 $ 52 09Corvallis 55,345 187.00 $ 1.36 $ 0.94 $ 8.02 $ 6.94 $ 18.61 $ 214.70 $ 51.76 $ 52.09
Philomath 4,625 16.01 $ 2.00 $ 1.60 $ 12.45 $ 9.25 $ 12.45 $ 22.75 $ 12.45 $ 12.45
Phoenix 4,570 19.47 $ 2.21 $ 1.46 $ 6.12 $ 52.93 $ 142.03 $ 1,146.71 $ 209.24 $ 43.72
Hillsboro 93,340 224.24 $ 3.18 $ 2.87 $ 21.00 $14.70 $ 32.60 $ 364.00 $ 95.80 $ 97.10 Milwaukie 20,500 74.01 $ 3.35 $ 2.10 $ 133.70 $ 115.61 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 250.00
Grants Pass 34,855 151.29 $ 3.42 $ 2.13 $ 11.40 $ 11.40 $ 34.19 $ 341.94 $ 34.19 $ 11.40
Tualatin 26,510 68.79 $ 3.92 $ 3.36 $ 77.50 $ 52.30 $ 90.30 $ 1,110.50 $ 297.60 $ 366.15
Talent 6,170 21.79 $ 3.93 $ 2.72 $ 264.86 $ 106.70 $ 91.20 $ 937.15 $ 93.71 $ 158.67
Wilsonville 21,550 7.64 $ 4.03 $ 2.62 $ 64.33 $ 64.33 $ 113.33 $ 285.88 $ 64.33 $ 113.33
Dufur 605 6.86 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00
Bay City 1,310 11.69 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 Unavailable
Hubbard 3,200 12.33 $ 5.20 $ 5.20 $4.50 per EDU
Clatskanie 1,745 10.20 $ 5.50 $ 5.50 $8.00 per month per unit Commercial / Motel, Hotel
Tigard 49,135 151.43 $ 5.83 $ 5.83 $1.31per parking space or fueling position
Eagle Point 8,575 39.68 $ 6.00 $ 6.00 $ 175.00 $ 151.20 $ 405.40 $ 1,237.00 $ 304.40 $ 434.75
La Grande 13,125 87.35 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 $ 8.00
Lake Oswego 36 990 167 33 $ 8 01 $ 5 72 $ 490 00 $ 330 90 $ 220 60 $ 1 103 00 $ 411 90 $ 205 95Lake Oswego 36,990 167.33 $ 8.01 $ 5.72 $ 490.00 $ 330.90 $ 220.60 $ 1,103.00 $ 411.90 $ 205.95
Ashland 20,295 102.99 $ 8.17 $ 6.23 $ 640.00 $ 222.00 $ 222.00 $ 1,110.00 $ 99.00 $ 146.00
Medford 75,920 280.70 $ 8.46 $ 5.42 $ 442.40 $ 293.31 $ 557.65 $ 3,758.19 $ 801.85 $ 499.91
Oregon City 33,990 135.60 $ 11.56 $ 8.12 $ 75.64 $ 65.40 $ 175.51 $ 535.59 $ 131.77 $ 188.18
Average $ 7.41 $ 6.22 $ 386.01 $ 193.57 $ 318.38 $ 1,801.26 $ 344.21 $ 278.03
High $ 11.56 $ 8.12 $ 640.00 $ 330.90 $ 557.65 $ 3,758.19 $ 801.85 $ 499.91
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Low $ 0.90 $ 0.90 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00
Rate ComparisonRESIDENTIAL NON‐RESIDENTIAL
SFR MFR
100000 SQ.FT.
MANUFACTURING
30,000 GENERAL OFFICE
BUILDING
20,000 SPECIALTY RETAIL
100,000 SUPER MARKET
10,000 DRIVE IN BANK
5000 FAST FOOD
RESTAURANT W/DTSFR MFR URING BUILDING RETAIL MARKET BANK W/DT
Average $ 7.41 $ 6.22 $ 386.01 $ 193.57 $ 318.38 $ 1,801.26 $ 344.21 $ 278.03
High $ 11.56 $ 8.12 $ 640.00 $ 330.90 $ 557.65 $ 3,758.19 $ 801.85 $ 499.91
Low $ 0.90 $ 0.90 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00
Hillsboro scenarios for new rates
Current $ 3.18 $ 2.87 $ 21.00 $ 14.70 $ 32.60 $ 364.00 $ 95.80 $ 97.10
Scenario A $ 5.00 $ 4.50 $ 22.00 $ 15.60 $ 34.60 $ 386.00 $ 101.50 $ 102.95
Scenario B $ 4 86 $ 4 18 $ 24 00 $ 16 80 $ 38 80 $ 414 00 $ 108 80 $ 120 95Scenario B $ 4.86 $ 4.18 $ 24.00 $ 16.80 $ 38.80 $ 414.00 $ 108.80 $ 120.95
Scenario B1 $ 5.24 $ 4.72 $ 27.00 $ 19.20 $ 45.00 $ 476.00 $ 125.20 $ 141.55
Hillsboro scenarios for new rates in Year Three (2017/2018)
Current $ 3.18 $ 2.87 $ 21.00 $ 14.70 $ 2.60 $ 364.00 $ 95.80 $ 97.10
Scenario A (2017/2018) $ 5.61 $ 5.05 $ 25.00 $ 17.40 $ 38.80 $ 434.00 $ 114.10 $ 115.65
Scenario B (2017/2018) $ 7.56 $ 6.81 $ 29.00 $ 21.00 $ 51.00 $ 513.00 $ 134.60 $ 168.60
Scenario B1 (2017/2018) $ 9.36 $ 8.42 $ 39.00 $ 28.50 $ 69.60 $ 701.00 $ 184.00 $ 230.40
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Discussion
• Discuss proposed modification and potentialDiscuss proposed modification and potential increases to the customer rate structure.
“Getting TUF on our streets.”
Next Steps
• December 17th – Transportation CommitteeC id k h ld f db k– Consider stakeholder feedback
– Recommend any changes be forwarded to Council
• January 6th ‐ City Council (tentative)– Set Public Hearing on any proposed changes
• February 3rd – City Council (tentative )Public Hearing– Public Hearing
• February to April‐ Outreach on changes (tentative)
• April 1st – Implement Changes (tentative)
“Getting TUF on our streets.”