Transforming Children’s Mental Health Care in America April 20, 2006 Gary M. Blau, Ph.D. Child,...
-
Upload
jayson-wilcox -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of Transforming Children’s Mental Health Care in America April 20, 2006 Gary M. Blau, Ph.D. Child,...
Transforming Children’s Mental Health Care in America
April 20, 2006
Gary M. Blau, Ph.D.Child, Adolescent and Family Branch
Center for Mental Health ServicesSubstance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
“I think you should be more explicit here in Step Two.”
Secret Formula for Transformation
Child, Adolescent Service System Program (CASSP) – 1984 –
Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services Program for Children and Their Families
– 1993 –
Circles of Care– 1998 –
Beginnings ~Beginnings ~
Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 budget
$106,000,000
System-of-Care Communities of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services
for Children and Their Families Program
Phase I (1993–1999)California 5 (Riverside, San Mateo, Santa
Cruz, Solano, & Ventura Counties)Santa Barbara County, CANapa & Sonoma Counties, CAWai‘anae & Leeward, HILyons, Riverside, & Proviso, ILSedgwick County, KSSoutheastern KansasMaine (4 counties)Baltimore, MDNavajo NationLas Cruces, NMMott Haven, NYEdgecombe, Nash, & Pitt Counties, NCBismarck, Fargo, & Minot, NDSouthern Consortium & Stark County, OHLane County, ORSouth Philadelphia, PARhode Island 1 (statewide)Charleston, SCAlexandria, VAVermont 1 (statewide)Milwaukee, WI
Phase II (1997–2004)Birmingham, ALSan Diego County, CAHillsborough County, FLEastern KentuckyPassamaquoddy Tribe, MEDetroit, MISault Ste. Marie Tribe, MISt. Charles County, MOLancaster County, NENebraska (22 counties)Clark County, NVNorth Carolina (11 counties)Sacred Child Project, NDClackamas County, ORAllegheny County 1, PARhode Island 2 (statewide)Travis County, TXRural Frontier, UTVermont 2 (statewide)Clark County, WAKing County, WAWisconsin (6 counties)Northern Arapaho Tribe, WY
Phase III (1999–2006)Yukon Kuskokwim Delta Region, AKPima County, AZContra Costa County, CAUnited Indian Health Service, CADenver area, CODelaware (statewide)West Palm Beach, FLGwinnett & Rockdale Counties, GALake County, INMarion County, INMontgomery County, MDWorcester, MAWillmar, MNHinds County, MSNew Hampshire (3 regions)Burlington County, NJWestchester County, NYNorth Carolina (11 counties)Greenwood, SCOglalla Sioux Tribe, SDNashville, TNCharleston, WV
Phase IV (2002–2010)Fairbanks Native Association, AK
Glenn County, CAMonterey, CA
Sacramento County, CASan Francisco, CA
Urban Trails, Oakland, CAColorado (4 counties)
Connecticut (statewide)Washington, DC
Broward County, FLGuamIdaho
Chicago, ILNorthern Kentucky
Southeastern LouisianaSouthwest Missouri
St. Louis, MOMontana & Crow Nation
Albany County, NYErie County, NY
New York, NYCuyahoga County, OH
Choctaw Nation, OKOklahoma (5 counties)
Mid-Columbia Region (4 counties), ORPuerto Rico
South Carolina (3 counties & Catawba Nation)
El Paso County, TXFt. Worth, TX
Phase V (2005–2011)Mississippi River Delta area, AR
Butte County, CACalifornia Rural Indian Health Board,
Inc., CALos Angeles County, CA
Placer County, CASoutheastern Connecticut
Sarasota County, FLHonolulu, HI
McHenry County, ILAugusta area, ME
Worcester County, MAIngham County, MI
Kalamazoo County, MIMinnesota (4 counties)
Blackfeet Tribe, MTMonroe County, NY
Mecklenburg County, NCMultnomah County, ORAllegheny County 2, PA
Beaver County, PARhode Island 3 (statewide)
Yankton Sioux Tribe, SDMaury County, TNHarris County, TX
Wyoming (statewide)
~ Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America ~
“We envision a future when everyone with a mental illness will recover, a future when mental illnesses can be prevented or cured, a future when mental illnesses are detected early, and a future when everyone with a mental illness at any stage of life has access to effective treatment and supports - essentials for living, working, learning, and participating fully in the community.”
The Federal Action Agenda Key Points
Mental illness & emotional disturbances are treatable
National Strategy for Suicide Prevention
Help states implement comprehensive state mental health plans
Mental health practice that is culturally competent and evidence-based
Improve interface between primary care & mental health services
Focus on early intervention
Expand “Science-to-Services agenda
Increase employment of people with psychiatric disabilities
Information system to better manage services & improve confidentiality
T = (V+B+A) x (CQI)2
Child, Adolescent & Family Level• Create positive experience with services
& supports• Promote family strengths• Develop child & youth potential & well-
being
Practice Level• Ensure effective and accessible service
delivery • Ensure sufficient and trained workforce• Promote culturally & linguistically
responsive service practices
System Level• Raise awareness about child & youth
mental health issues• Ensure collaborations to integrate mental
health as a component in overall health• Ensure access to resources to address
child and family mental health issues
Programs• Children’s Mental Health Initiative• Circles of Care• Partnerships for Youth Transition• Statewide Family Networks• Child & Adolescent State Infrastructure
Grants
Branch Functions• Technical Assistance for grant
preparation• Oversee all implementation
requirements of grants, cooperative agreements and contracts
Extensive Partner Network• Communications• Technical Assistance• Research / Evaluation• Agreements with other federal agencies
Child, Adolescent & Family Level• Significant improvement in behavior &
emotional functioning of children• Increased satisfaction with services• Family & youth have a decision-
making role in service planning
Practice Level• Increased use of evidence-based
practice• Increased workforce training• Practice reflects the cultural and
linguistic characteristics of the population being served
System Level• Increased sustainability of grantees• Increased collaboration across federal
agencies• Sustained or increased funding
available for the support of programs
Family driven means…
Families have a primary decision making role in the care of their own children as well as the policies and procedures governing care for all children in their community, state, tribe, territory and nation.
Family driven means that families take the lead in…
Choosing supports, services, and providers;
Setting goals;
Designing and implementing programs;
Monitoring outcomes; and
Determining the effectiveness of all efforts to promote the mental health and well being of children and youth.
Youth Guided means that youthtake the lead in…
Educating all professionals and adults who work with young people on the importance of engaging and empowering youth.
Youth Involvement in Systems of Care
A starting point for understanding youth involvement and engagement in order to develop and fully integrate a youth-directed movement within local systems of care.
http://www.tapartnership.org/
Cultural & Linguistic Competence
Reduce disparities and enhance cultural and linguistic competence among policy-makers, administrators and service providers.
• Enhance organizational capacity for cultural and linguistic competence.
• Increase awareness and knowledge of factors that contribute to disparities.
• Develop specific approaches that contribute to the goal of eliminating disparities.
Promote the active training of providers on state-of-the art, culturally and linguistically competent clinical practice.
Clinical Excellence
Promote the local and national evaluation of research data to identify evidence-based practices.Develop a research agenda to enhance the understanding of how to develop and provide effective, efficient and coordinated services within Systems of Care.
• Priority list of research areas to guide the national evaluation.
• Searchable electronic knowledge management system.
• Infrastructure for supporting activities of a National Evaluation Data Users Group.
• CQI report card.
Evidence Based Practice
Through Fiscal Year (FY) 2005: 73,383 children served Average # of children served per year = 11,278
Average Federal expenditure per child across program years = $13,039 or ~ $150/week in services per child (estimated length of stay ~ 17 months)
3.6
1.8
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
Time
Me
an
# o
f d
ay
s
Intake 12 months
Cost Savings from Reduction in Inpatient Hospitalization:
Intake to 12 Months*
(n =3,563)
*Average difference in inpatient hospitalization days multiplied by the national daily cost estimate. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) estimated the national average daily cost of inpatient hospital care in 2002 was $1,501 per day (AHRQ, 2004).
Average per child cost savings =
$2,776.85
0.5
0.3
0.0
0.5
1.0
Time
Me
an
# o
f a
rre
sts
in
pa
st
6 m
o. Intake 12 months
Cost Savings from Reduction in Arrests: Intake to 12 Months*
(n =3,563)
*Average difference in number of arrests multiplied by the national cost estimate. The Bureau of Justice Statistics estimated the average cost per juvenile arrest was $4,149 in 2000 (CASA, 2004).
Average per child cost savings =
$784.16
Adjusted and Unadjusted Between-Site Differences in Expenditures: Entry to 12 Months*
$1579
$-687
$-60
$294
$-258
$868
$-102
Core MHS
Juvenile Justice
Child Welfare
Special Education
Inpatient MHS
All Sectors (Unadjusted)
All Sectors (Propensity Score)
$0 $500 $1000 $1500 $2000$-500$-1000
Average Costs Per ParticipantFunded community spent more on mental health and special education per child.Comparison community spent more on juvenile justice, child welfare and inpatient per child.After statistical adjustment, overall costs across all sectors essentially the same.
Reduction of Juvenile Justice Involvement
Initial involvement and recidivism rates for serious crimes decreased significantly in funded community.
Recidivism rates for serious crimes increased in comparison community
Changes in Juvenile Justice Involvement Rates over Time
9.5%
66.8%
13.7%
46.5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Jefferson Montgomery
Per
cen
t
Intake 18 months
The proportion of youth charged with crimes decreased significantly* during the first 18 months of services in the Jefferson county system of care. Conversely, the rates of juvenile justice involvement among youth in Montgomery county increased.
Continuous Quality Improvement (2)
It is imperative that we apply a CQI mindset to every initiative, program, or practice approach we take. We must constantly be asking ourselves “How can we make what we are doing better?”
CQI - requires that you raise the bar even higher, and ask yourself how you could make it even better!
Specific continuous quality improvement efforts Startup Teams for new sites
Expanding populations of concern for system of care communities
Expanding target population to include those youth who have, or who are at risk of having a serious emotional or behavioral disorder
Advancing the concepts of Family Involvement/ Family –Driven & Youth Guided within the systems of care.
Reducing disparities and enhancing cultural and linguistic competence within the Comprehensive Children’s Mental Health program.
Developing a research agenda to enhance the understanding of how to develop and provide effective, efficient and coordinated services within systems of care.
How
How
can are
we
we
improve? doing?
Family-driven
Youth-guided
Cultural &
linguistic
competence
Evidence-
based / Clinical
excellence
Continuous
quality
improvement
Transformation Score Card
From Ordinary…
To Extraordinary…
Remember ~youth and families are at the core of all that we do
Rededicate ~to system of care values and principles
Rejoice ~Our accomplishments, our spirit, and our resiliency
Oh yeah, have some fun… but don’t play with Kryptonite
Turn a
bad hair
day into
a new
style…
Remember, Rededicate, Rejoice & Transform