Transcript of DuPuy hearing

26
1 REPORTER'S RECORD VOLUME 1 OF 1 VOLUMES TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 09CV1183 MR. MARGARITA, L.P. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) vs. ) GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS ) DUPUY & ASSOCIATES, ET AL ) 405TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT _____________________________________________ HEARING ON MOTIONS _____________________________________________ On the 26th day of January, 2012, the following proceedings came on to be held in the above-titled and numbered cause before the Honorable Elizabeth Ray, Judge Presiding, held in Galveston, Galveston County, Texas. Proceedings reported by computerized stenotype machine. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Transcript of Transcript of DuPuy hearing

Page 1: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

1

REPORTER'S RECORD VOLUME 1 OF 1 VOLUMES

TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 09CV1183

MR. MARGARITA, L.P. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT )

vs. ) GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS )

DUPUY & ASSOCIATES, ET AL ) 405TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

_____________________________________________

HEARING ON MOTIONS _____________________________________________

On the 26th day of January, 2012, the following

proceedings came on to be held in the above-titled and

numbered cause before the Honorable Elizabeth Ray, Judge

Presiding, held in Galveston, Galveston County, Texas.

Proceedings reported by computerized stenotype

machine.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 2: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

2

APPEARANCES

Mr. David Bryant SBOT No. 00785730 Ms. Jessica Juren SBOT No. 24058577 5020 Montrose Blvd., 7th Floor Houston, Texas 77006 Telephone: 832-487-0880 Attorney for Plaintiff

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 3: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

3

VOLUME 1

HEARING ON MOTIONS

January 26, 2012

PAGE VOL.

Greg Hughes Direct Cross V.Dire By Mr. Bryant 14 v1 Reporter's Certificate 25 1 ...........................

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 4: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

4

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Use is indicated as follows:

J - Jury R - Record Only D - Demonstrative EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION OFFERED ADMITTED USE

P-1 8 v1 8 v1 RRegister of Actions, Case No. 09-CV-1183

P-2 8 v1 8 v1 RDefendant's Notice

P-3 9 v1 9 v1 ROrder Setting Deposition and Rule 11 Agreement

P-4 9 v1 9 v1 REmergency Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Mandamus

P-5 10 v1 11 v1 RLetter from Kathleen Collins

P-6 11 v1 11 v1 RLetter from David Bryant

P-7 12 v1 12 v1 RRelevant Timeline

P-8 13 v1 13 v1 RSecond Motion to Recuse and Disqualify Judge Shearn Smith

P-9 20 v1 20 v1 ROrder Denying Defendant's Requestion for a Stay of Proceedings

P-10 20 v1 20 v1 RMemorandum Opinion

P-11 21 v1 21 v1 RPetition for Writ of Mandamus

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 5: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

5

January 26, 2012

THE COURT: This is Cause No. 09CV1183,

Mr. Margarita L.P. Vs. Dupuy & Associates, and this is

on a Motion to Recuse and Motion for Sanctions. So

would you please announce who is here and who is not.

MR. BRYANT: Thank you, Your Honor. My

name is David Bryant, and I'm here on behalf of the

plaintiff, Mr. Margarita. I have Jessica Juren here who

is also an attorney with my office. We are present.

The defendant and the movant is not.

THE COURT: And are the people in the

courtroom witnesses or --

MR. BRYANT: Greg Hughes is an attorney

here in Galveston. I might ask him a couple questions.

But Julie Hatcher is also an attorney here in town. I

don't think -- she is just here to listen, I think.

THE COURT: Well, you may or may not

know -- I don't know if you do or not -- but apparently

the court received a letter today from Rachel Morales

saying that the office is withdrawing and passing the

hearing. Well, of course, they cannot pass the hearing.

The hearing is set as a result of the Motion to Recuse

and it's set by the court. That's not an option. The

withdrawal, of course, is not in front of me because

that would be, depending on the ruling on the Motion to

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 6: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

6

Recuse, that would be in front of the regular judge. So

I can't rule on that.

For the record purposes, the Motion to

Pass the Hearing is denied, and that puts the Motion to

Recuse -- what I believe to be the Second Motion to

Recuse -- although I believe they filed it as an Amended

Motion to Recuse -- that puts that at play; and since

there is no one here to promote that motion, that motion

is hereby denied.

That leaves, I believe, in front of me

your Motion for Sanctions.

MR. BRYANT: Yes, Judge.

THE COURT: Do you have any objection to

how I just proceeded?

MR. BRYANT: Not at all.

THE COURT: Because of the fact the other

side is not here, there is no lodged objection to the

way that I have proceeded, so we will now take up your

Motion for Sanctions.

MR. BRYANT: Thank you very much, Judge.

I don't know if the court reporter has a

few exhibit stickers? If the court doesn't mind, I will

hand number my exhibits. I didn't know how it was going

to go today.

What I have done, Your Honor, is I have

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 7: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

7

pulled from the record a few documents that I think

exemplify the sort of conduct that we have been dealing

with in this case from Day One. I have here as

Exhibit 1 that I'd offer into evidence, and Exhibit 1 is

basically a printout -- may I approach, Your Honor?

THE COURT: Sure.

MR. BRYANT: I will tender to the court

Exhibit 1. That is a printout from the records of this

case from the publicly available docket sheet indicating

the various documents that have been filed, motions, et

cetera. And I've highlighted for the court's

information some various items indicative of the delay

tactics and frivolity of the defendant's motions and the

things that they have tried to do for the sole purpose

of avoiding a single deposition. I have been

attempting, Judge -- as I know you know because you read

the whole file -- I have been trying to get a deposition

of our defendant, a lawyer and now sitting judge in this

county, for over eight months and every time I attempt

to get that deposition, whether it's by court order,

agreement or otherwise, I am met with something else.

I'm met with a Motion to Quash. I'm met with a, quote,

"notice."

I'll mark this as Exhibit 2. There was

a -- I'll offer Exhibit 1, Your Honor.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 8: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

8

THE COURT: Exhibit 1 is admitted.

MR. BRYANT: Exhibit 2, Your Honor, is a

document that was filed by the defendants on August the

29th on the eve of the deposition that was ordered in

this case for September the 1st of 2011. It says,

"Defendant's notice that plaintiff's pleadings are

stricken per court order and notice that dismissal is

now purely ministerial." This document was filed

because the defendant had a dispute about whether my

pleadings had been amended properly in response to a

special exceptions. That document was filed. I got a

letter on a fax saying that they are not going to appear

at the deposition, so we come back to court.

I'll mark Exhibit 3. Exhibit 3 -- I would

offer Exhibit 2, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Exhibit 2 is admitted.

MR. BRYANT: Exhibit 3 is actually two

documents. The first page is the order setting the

deposition of Christopher Dupuy. This was a hearing

held on September the 16th, 2011, as a result of the

failure to appear for his deposition the second time,

wherein the court orders that the deposition of

Christopher Dupuy is to take place on the 6th of

October, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. And then we have a Rule 11

agreement where the defendant agreed to pay $1,830 for

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 9: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

9

attorney's fees and expenses in preparing the Motion for

Deposition and Motion to Compel as a result of the

defendant's failure to appear for two depositions

ordered by the court.

I would offer Exhibit 3.

THE COURT: Exhibit 3 is admitted.

MR. BRYANT: That document clearly

indicates, Your Honor, that the court for the second

time has ordered a deposition -- actually, the third

time -- second time, excuse me, has ordered the

deposition of the defendant; and on the morning of or

the afternoon before -- the morning of the October the

6th deposition, I get Exhibit 4 which is an Emergency

Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Mandamus.

And I'd offer Exhibit 4.

THE COURT: Exhibit 4 is admitted.

MR. BRYANT: I also received at the same

time, Judge -- I think I probably have it here -- there

is a letter from Ms. Collins, who is the counsel for the

defendant, and in that letter she indicates that her

client will not be appearing at the deposition because

of the fact that they have filed -- here we go. This is

exhibit -- well, I'll just show the court this. If we

need to make it an exhibit, we will. It's actually part

of a larger set of exhibits that I had for my Motion to

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 10: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

10

Compel, etc.

And in this letter she indicates that her

client is being released to serve the citizens of

Galveston County and, in other words, she is not going

to have her client appear for the deposition that was

clearly ordered by the court because she believes that

the mandamus stays the proceeding. It clearly did not.

I sent her back a letter saying that

that's going to be a problem. And I'm going to go

ahead, and if we could, just get a copy of this. I

apologize, Judge, for having this out of order, but I'm

going to say this is Exhibit 5 and the next letter is

Exhibit 6. And we will make a copy of this, if we

could, Judge. I will tender it to the court and I will

offer it into evidence pending a copy, if we can do

that.

THE COURT: Sure.

MR. BRYANT: Exhibit 5. That's the letter

I just showed you.

THE COURT: Okay.

MR. BRYANT: If we go to the next page,

Exhibit 6, this is the letter that I sent back to

Ms. Collins explaining to her that her mandamus

application did not stay the proceedings, that I intend

to seek sanctions. And at the very end you notice I say

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 11: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

11

specifically I'm going to send my court reporter down

there. I don't want to come down there for no reason.

I'm going to send somebody to take a certificate of

nonappearance. I don't get a response to that.

I would offer Exhibit 6, also.

THE COURT: 5 and 6 are both admitted.

MR. BRYANT: I didn't get a response to

that letter. What she indicated to me was that her

client was going to be released. That morning of the

deposition I got a call from my court reporter saying

that the defendant is here, what do we do; he wants to

make a statement on the record. And so, as you might

imagine, I'm very upset about the fact that these games

are being played with myself and my client and my staff,

and so I basically indicate on the record that we

disagree with how this was happening and we are going to

seek sanctions, etc. So I filed a Motion for Sanctions.

And if you can imagine what's going to

happen at the deposition, Judge, based upon what's going

on in this case, I can't imagine a situation where the

defendant is going to answer my questions correctly,

properly, according to the rules. So I asked for the

appointment of a special master. I asked for fees, a

Motion to Compel, appointment of a special master, and I

set that hearing.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 12: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

12

In response -- what are we on, Exhibit 7?

I've got Exhibit 7 here which is actually a timeline,

Judge, that I took from the docket sheet. In response

to my Motion to Compel and for Sanctions that was set

for November the 8th, 2011, I show up at this courthouse

for a hearing and we receive a Motion to Recuse. We

don't receive a response, we receive a Motion to Recuse.

As you know, we appeared for the hearing

on that Motion to Recuse and the defendant failed to

show up. I filed a response. We were here. You denied

that motion. Then I filed a Motion to Show Authority.

By the way, Exhibit 7, I'll offer

Exhibit 7, which is the summary of the relevant events

in this case.

THE COURT: 7 is admitted.

MR. BRYANT: I also filed a Motion to Show

Authority because what the defendant in this case has

been doing, even though he's a sitting judge and is not

allowed to practice law by statute, he has been filing

documents, motions, signing with permission as if he is

acting on behalf of his counsel when, in fact, he's just

practicing law. So I filed a Motion to Show Authority

and asked for a standing order that each time he does

that, he has to pay a $500 fine, because I'm entitled to

know who the counsel is so I can communicate with him.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 13: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

13

Well, all these motions get set again, and

now we have this, Exhibit 8, which is the Second -- what

I call -- it's not a First Amended, it's a Second Motion

to Recuse because it states a different basis. This is

Exhibit 8. And I know the court has seen this, Exhibit

8. I'd offer it into evidence.

THE COURT: Exhibit 8 is admitted.

MR. BRYANT: The only difference in the

first motion and the second motion, Judge, is that Judge

Dupuy claims that he has filed a complaint against Judge

Smith with the judicial committee because he hasn't

acted however Judge Dupuy wants him to act. I don't

know what the basis of it is. I have never seen it. I

don't even know if it's really been filed. I have no

clue. So, fine, I filed my response and I asked for

sanctions because under Rule 18a if you determine that

these motions have been filed for the purpose of delay

and there is no substantial or significant cause for the

motions, you can grant sanctions under Rule 250.

I have Greg Hughes here, and I would like

to ask him a couple questions, if I could, Judge.

THE COURT: That's fine.

MR. BRYANT: I don't know if you want to

swear him or not. He's an officer of the court.

THE COURT: Do you mind?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 14: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

14

(Witness sworn)

MR. BRYANT: The purpose of this

testimony, Judge, is so -- I think you need to hear how

our defendant views recusals, because in this case he

has filed two frivolous Motions to Recuse, didn't show

up for either one of them. In the Mayville case, which

you have also been assigned to hear, in gathering

information about my client's case, I did some research

and found this case that was sealed so I filed my Motion

to Unseal the Record and on the day of the hearing,

Judge Trapp travels from Coldspring, Texas, all the way

down here only to receive another Motion to Recuse,

supposedly because he had spoken with the other attorney

or something and said, Well, you don't have to come to

some hearing, some kind of supposed ex parte

communication that would violate the ethical rules,

which he didn't. So you can see a pattern here, I

think. Now Mr. Hughes has a personal experience as well

that I wanted to share with the court.

GREG HUGHES,

having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:

DIRECT EXAMINATION

Q. (BY MR. BRYANT) Greg, you can tell the court a

little bit about your practice, what you do here in

Galveston or in Friendswood. I guess you're in

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 15: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

15

Friendswood?

A. I practice in Friendswood. I have a general

practice, solo, primarily family law. I have been doing

that for about 21 years.

Q. Are you familiar with Judge Dupuy --

A. Yes.

Q. -- who is in County Court 3 here in Galveston

County?

A. Yes.

Q. How are you familiar with him?

A. Well, I first really got to know him, I had a

case that was in his court. I went to mediation, and

someone told me that the -- my opposing counsel was

dating him and I might want to look into a recusal.

Q. Who was that opposing counsel?

A. It's Kathleen Collins.

Q. That's the same lawyer that's representing

Judge Dupuy in this case, right?

A. I believe so.

Q. Okay. So what did you do? Did you --

A. Well, first, I spoke with Kathleen a little bit

on a break at the mediation. She asked me if I was

going to try to recuse him; and I said, Do I need to?

And she said, Well, we don't have a relationship. Okay.

So I went ahead with the mediation. I didn't think

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 16: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

16

anything more about it. I heard later from other people

more persistent rumors and started looking into it and

believed that they probably did have a relationship. So

that case was set for hearing and I prepared a Motion to

Recuse but I got there first and told Kathleen, Look, I

want to go talk to the Judge about the recusal. She

said, You don't need to do that. He's already heard a

bunch of cases. He's already turned them down. He's

already told me he's not going to recuse himself

anymore.

Q. He told her that?

A. Told her that, yeah. I insisted that she come

back with me because I didn't want to talk to him

ex parte. It's actually the first time I'd ever spoken

to him. Finally she agreed to go. We went back in his

chambers; and I told him before I went on the record, I

asked him if he would like to recuse himself because we

perceived that there was a relationship between them.

He said, No, file your motion. So I went and filed my

motion, brought him a courtesy copy and waited in the

courtroom for a while. He came out for our hearing. He

announced that he read the motion, it had no basis in

law or fact or we were going to go forward with the

hearing. And then I reminded him that he couldn't do

anything after I filed the motion, and so he said fine.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 17: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

17

Q. Did he do something?

A. He --

Q. Did he enter any orders at that point?

A. No, he didn't enter an official order, but

Kathleen reminded him that the TRO in the case was

expiring that day and she wanted to renew it.

Q. The temporary orders on the child support?

A. Yes. He said, I will do that. I reminded him

that he could not do that, that he didn't have authority

to do that. He got very angry, started talking to my

client and told the client that the orders were expiring

that day, but he had better continue following them and

if he found out that he wasn't following them, that he

would have problems when he came back to his courtroom.

So we went on. Eventually I had the

recusal hearing in front of Judge Underwood; and in the

meantime, I had found Mr. Dupuy's ex-wife, Adrienne

Viterna, who was the first witness that was able to

specifically testify that he did have a relationship

with Kathleen because Kathleen had been picking their

children up from school. They had been -- she had been

keeping the children at her house. They were visiting

back and forth. I mean, they were, you know, buddies

everywhere, not just in the courtroom.

That was on a Thursday which was, I

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 18: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

18

believe, August the 3rd. The next morning I get a call

from Judge Dupuy who is in San Antonio at the Advanced

Family Law Conference, and he's very angry. He

identifies himself.

Q. Do you know what day that was?

A. That was August 4th, 2011, at 11:58 a.m. I

wrote notes down as he called me. He identified

himself. He asked me how I had gotten his ex-wife to

testify.

Q. Did you recognize his voice?

A. Oh, absolutely. I told him that I had heard

his ex-wife knew information and I called her and

eventually subpoenaed her. He was very mad, told me it

was a very sleezy thing to do to get his ex-wife

involved and went on and on about how inappropriate it

was, what a sleezy attorney I was, one thing or another.

And then he wanted to know who had told me about his

ex-wife and who knew this information. And, of course,

I told him I didn't think those people would want me to

share that, so I didn't tell him that.

And then in closing, he told me that I was

a sleezy attorney and reminded me that I would have to

appear in his court again one day and that he would

remember me when I did. I very, very clearly took that

as a clear implication that he intended to punish me for

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 19: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

19

filing the motion and involving his ex-wife. And since

the newspaper articles have come out about that, I have

heard from many, many other people similar stories.

Q. Have you filed a complaint with the judicial

committee?

A. I have.

Q. With the State Bar?

A. Yes. Actually, no, I don't think I have with

the State Bar, just with the judicial committee.

MR. BRYANT: I don't have anything further

from him. I wanted you to hear how this defendant views

recusals and his obligations under the law in the broad

scheme of things because I think what we have here is a

defendant who's never going to comply with anything this

court orders and the only way to make them comply is to

hit them in the pocketbook. It's the only thing we can

do. I don't think under National Tank I can ask you to

strike the pleadings. I don't think I ask you to strike

the pleadings. Maybe I can. But you might feel

uncomfortable doing that, and I don't want you to feel

uncomfortable.

I researched some of the case law you have

been involved with, and I know that you know all about

this. You know all about sanctions and how that works.

I'm asking for $7,500 which I don't think is too much to

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 20: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

20

enforce the law in this courtroom, and so that's what

I'm asking for. I want you to see -- here is something

else that's very telling, very telling about the purpose

of this motion. And I think the court is very clear the

purpose of this motion is for the purpose of Judge

Dupuy's motions. I don't know if the court knows, but

there is another mandamus that was filed a couple days

ago in the First Court of Appeals. I have two more

exhibits.

THE COURT: Is it on this case?

MR. BRYANT: Yes, ma'am. I'm going to

mark Exhibit 9, 10 and 11. If I could, Judge, I would

like to show you, Exhibit 9 is an order from Judge

Shearn Smith dated October the 7th denying defendant's

request for a stay of proceedings. I'd offer Exhibit 9.

THE COURT: 9 is admitted.

MR. BRYANT: Here is -- and this is in

response to their first mandamus. In that mandamus,

Your Honor, they ask the Court of Appeals to force Judge

Smith to grant their summary judgment. Not to make a

ruling, to grant the summary judgment. They summarily

denied it, and here is the order, Exhibit 10. I would

offer it into evidence, dated October 28, 2011.

THE COURT: 10 is admitted.

MR. BRYANT: That very clearly indicates

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 21: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

21

that the Court of Appeals, on its own motion, without

any response by myself or Judge Smith, denied that

motion. Now we have the defendant filing the Motion to

Recuse asking this court to prevent Judge Smith from

doing anything else in this case. Two days ago I

receive another mandamus. It's Exhibit 10, Your Honor.

I'll offer Exhibit 10 -- 11. Excuse me.

THE COURT: Admitted.

MR. BRYANT: Not only is that mandamus not

a proper mandamus because it has no official transcript

from this court or the district clerk, it's just merely

pages out of someone's file at their office, that

mandamus also seeks to have Judge Smith do something. I

don't think they can have it both ways. I think it

makes it very clear, Judge, that this Motion to Recuse,

the sole purpose of it is to delay the inevitable, which

is the deposition of Judge Dupuy.

Now, I think I've shown what I need to

show under Rule 18a. I have spent many hours dealing

with this case, Judge. In my motion I indicate that my

time dealing with just the recusal -- I'm not asking for

fees on the whole case, which maybe I should, and I will

at some point -- but I have -- and I'll represent to the

court as an officer of the court -- I don't know if you

need to swear me or not, Your Honor -- but I can tell

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 22: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

22

you that I have spent at least 15 hours and my normal

hourly rate is $350 an hour. I have been practicing law

for 18 years. I have tried a lot of cases, and I think

that's a reasonable rate for me in this community and

that these services were necessary because of what's

been happening in this case. In order for me to get

compliance with the Rules of Procedure, I've had to go

through these hoops created solely by the defendant, not

created by me. That doesn't include the time -- and

that total would be $5,250. That does not include the

time of my associate lawyer, Jessica Juren, who is here

today. It doesn't include the time of my paralegal

which I normally bill at a hundred dollars an hour.

Ms. Juren, I normally bill at $200 an hour. So there is

a lot more time involved in this. I think my estimate

here is low.

Judge, I'm not getting paid for this case.

I told my client a long time ago, it's not fair for me

to charge him any more. He can't afford it. And based

upon how this case has been handled, I said, You know

what, I'm going to do this. I'm just going to do it.

But that doesn't mean I shouldn't get my fees for what I

have had to go through. Just so the court knows, my

client doesn't owe me this money, but I think the court

should sanction the defendant for what I have had to do

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 23: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

23

and what my staff has had to do needlessly and in clear

violation of the rules.

THE COURT: Counsel, I have read your

motion. I don't have it in front of me -- or I do have

it in front of me, but you can tell me faster than I can

find it. Is the sanction that you have asked for -- is

the only sanction that you have asked for is the payment

of this $7,500?

MR. BRYANT: Yes. Your Honor, to you,

that's all I'm asking for. When I go back -- when this

case goes back to Judge Smith, I will be asking to reset

all those other motions where I'm asking for a lot more.

THE COURT: My recollection from our last

hearing was that you had not reset the deposition of

Judge Dupuy? You were --

MR. BRYANT: We are still trying to get

that. That was part of my motion that got reset in

response to which we received these Motions to Recuse.

THE COURT: The case had been -- my

recollection, the case had been moved to maybe a July

trial setting?

MR. BRYANT: That was an error. I don't

know how that happened, but it's been set to April.

THE COURT: April?

MR. BRYANT: Yes, ma'am. April the 16th,

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 24: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

24

I think, is the docket call and then the 23rd. She

might know.

THE COURT: And the next hearing that's

set for this case for any matter, is there one set?

MR. BRYANT: There is not because this

stopped the works.

I have an order, Judge, if you care to

look at it. I would ask this court to enter the order

for sanctions jointly and severally against counsel and

the defendant because it's clear that either Ms. Collins

is allowing her client to use her bar number and sign

her name with permission or vice vera. I don't know

what they are doing. But they are both creating this

problem in the case, and I think it should be jointly

and severally.

THE COURT: Okay. The court grants your

motion.

MR. BRYANT: Thank you.

THE COURT: And awards $7,500 jointly and

severally against both Judge Dupuy and his counsel to

cover attorney's fees and costs.

This payment is to be made within 10 days

of this date, which I believe to be the 26th of January.

Am I right, or is it the 25th?

MR. BRYANT: The 26th.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 25: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

25

THE COURT: So 10 days from today with the

possibility of non-payment may result in, depending on

what Judge Smith decides to do, but it may result in a

complete striking of the pleadings and other appropriate

sanctions. So I put that on the record just to make

sure that the record is clear that this is an interim

step, but there could be more to come depending on Judge

Smith's rulings --

MR. BRYANT: Thank you very much.

THE COURT: -- for sanctions.

So I have signed that order. Again, the

Motion to Recuse is denied. The court considers that to

be a second motion, not an amended motion, and that

motion is hereby denied.

MR. BRYANT: Thank you very much.

THE COURT: You're welcome.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 26: Transcript of DuPuy hearing

26

STATE OF TEXAS

COUNTY OF GALVESTON

I, Tamra M. Parks, Deputy Official Court Reporter in

and for the 405th District Court of Galveston, State of

Texas, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing

contains a true and correct transcription of all

portions of evidence and other proceedings requested in

writing by counsel for the parties to be included in

this volume of the Reporter's Record in the above-styled

and numbered cause, all of which occurred in open court

or in chambers and were reported by me.

I further certify that this Reporter's Record of the

proceedings truly and correctly reflects the exhibits,

if any, offered by the respective parties.

I further certify that the total cost for the

preparation of this Reporter's Record is ________ and

was paid/will be paid by ___________________.

Tamra M. Parks, CSR Texas CSR 167 Deputy Official Court Reporter 405th District Court Galveston County, Texas 600 59th Street Galveston, Texas 77550 Telephone: 713-502-6833 Expiration: 12/31/2012

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25