Traditional Chinese Social Structure, c. 1949 Land and labor Village and clan.
-
Upload
edward-hodge -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of Traditional Chinese Social Structure, c. 1949 Land and labor Village and clan.
Example: Gao village, (Hunan)
1949:• 280 mu (46 acres) for 20
households• 1 landlord, 45 mu (7.4 ac.)• 1 rich peasant, 33 mu (5.4 ac.)• Average middle peasant: 13.8 mu
(2.3 ac.)• Average poor peasant: 6 mu (1 ac.)
“Dig out the rotten root of
feudalism”• Who depends upon whom for a living?• Why are the poor poor and the rich
rich?• Should rent be paid to the landlords?(issues raised at organizing meetings
for land reform; Hinton, 1966: 128)
Why were these questions so
difficult?• Land and labor linked to clan
system• Clan structure shaped village life• Relative autonomy of clan/village
created basis of solidarity vs. outsiders, other clans and villages
• Religious ideology (esp. ancestor worship and Confucianism) supported clan structure
Clan power
• Small Gao village could unite with larger Gao village nearby
• Within clan, dominant branch or family could control more land
• “Feudal” exploitation obscured by religious ideology (Gao’s landlord taught Confucianism)
• Dilemma for communists: how to weaken this structure while maintaining peasant support
The People’s Republic
“We have stood up.”Mao Zedong to the Political
Consultative Congress, Sept. 11, 1949
What was the structure of the
new state?• “people’s democratic
dictatorship”– (“New Democracy”)• Control of key industries (like
social democracy-style socialism)• Democratic centralism in CCP• Democratic centralism in National
People’s Congress
State structure (simplified by
Shafer)
Chinese Communist Party
National Peoples Congress
People’s Liberation Army
People (in mass organizations, social institutions)
CPPCC
State Council
Judiciary
Cadre system
• Inherited from Republic, which revised imperial structure
• Li: “state technocrats” (37)• Even more power under Jiang Jieshi• Includes (Li: 48):
– government officials – military officers – managers of state-owned or even large
private corporations – intellectuals
Immediate tasks:
• Land reform • Marriage law• “Resist America, Aid Korea” • Suppression of
counterrevolutionaries• Thought reform• Three-Anti’s and Five-Anti’s (anti-
corruption)
What was the “deep
contradiction”?• Dietrich: institutional development
vs. revolutionary transformation– Bureaucracy vs. mass mobilization– Rationalization (development) vs.
emotion (revolutionary romanticism)
• Benson: nationalism and socialism
Socialist transition: First Five-Year Plan (1953-1957)
• Bourgeois stage “abruptly terminated”? (Meisner, p. 108)
• Soviet “aid”—with strings; loans with interest (Cf. Dietrich, p. 85, 87)
• Negative lessons from USSR collectivization
• Maoist “peasant socialism”: first, mutual aid teams, then “lower” Agricultural Producers Cooperatives (APCs), then…
First five-year plan
• Soviet aid actually minimal; 3% of total investment
• But “a drive based on the wholesale adoption of Stalinist methods” (Meisner: 109)
• Growth impressive; 1952-57 18% rate higher than goal (14.7%) (Meisner: 112-113)
• “a significant and stable modern industrial base” (ibid)
• But social and economic costs to peasants
Contradictions in First Five-
Year Plan• Two line struggle: Mao vs. “handwringers;”
collectivization vs. “deep” private property concept; “old revolutionaries” vs. “new cadres”
• “one-man management” vs. socialist “new man”• Bureaucratization vs. revolutionary
transformation• Also reflected in education: “indoctrination” vs.
bureaucratic elitism (examination system)
High Tide
• 1955: caution prevails in Politburo, APCs dissolved
• Mao goes to masses and lower levels, predicts “imminent” mass movement for socialism
• Cadres investigate, enthusiastic villages held up as examples
Relations vs. forces
• Mao: revolutionize relations of production first
• Forces of production will follow• Opponents argue forces first
Base-Superstructure
Superstructure
Ideas, ideology, institutions
Social reproduction
Social forces of production
Relations of production
Means of production
Class struggle Revolution
New superstructure
New forces of production
Socialist transition: High
Tide• Campaign turns to industry; even
more complete reorganization• By 1956, almost entire country in
socialist transition
Socialist transition: Hundred Flowers• Khruschev’s criticism of Stalin
opens new possibilities in Third International
• Mao, holding firmly to mass line, advocates “big democracy”—let one hundred flowers bloom
• “On the correct handling..“
Why the hundred flowers
campaign?• “A vast and routinized bureaucratic
apparatus…” (Meisner, 170)• Note the role of Liu Shaoqi and Deng
Xiaoping in the Party at that moment• Who does Mao turn to, to counter that?• Contradiction between leadership and
the led• Mao: “…question whether socialism or
capitalism will win is still not settled.”