Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

36
Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09
  • date post

    21-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    217
  • download

    3

Transcript of Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Page 1: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Trade Secrets II

Intro to IP – Prof Merges

4.7.09

Page 2: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Agenda

• Misappropriation

– “Reasonable precautions” – Rockwell Graphics

– Improper means: DuPont v. Christopher

– Confidential relationship: Smith v. Dravo

– Reverse engineering: Kadant v. Seeley

Page 3: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Rockwell

• Facts

• Posner opinion

Page 4: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Prof/Judge Richard Posner

Page 5: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Goss Graphic Systems, Inc. (formerly Rockwell) designs, manufactures, and markets Web offset printing press systems. The company offers newspaper press systems for newspaper publishers; commercial press systems for brochures, books, etc. It also provides after sales service and replacement parts for its equipment. Founded, 1885, based in Illinois.

Page 6: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.
Page 7: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.
Page 8: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Rockwell facts

• Piece part drawings

• Assembly drawings

• Vendors (subcontractors); customers

Page 9: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Elements of a Trade Secret Action

• Eligible Subject Matter– Information that derives economic

value from being kept secret– Must be secret

• Reasonable Precautions to Keep Secret

• Misappropriation

Page 10: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Trial Court

• Held: Drawings did not contain trade secrets

• No “reasonable efforts” to maintain secrecy

Page 11: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Posner opinion

• Reviews precautions Rockwell did take– Vault, confidentiality agreements

• “The mere fact that Rockwell gave piece part drawings to vendors . . . Did not forfeit trade secret protection” – p. 51

Page 12: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Two conceptions of TS law: p. 51

• Tort-oriented/commercial ethics: deter efforts at “sterile” wealth redistribution – i.e., theft

• Encourage inventive activity: incentive, “property”-like orientation

Page 13: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Role of precautions

• Shows that info must have been taken wrongfully – evidence of bad acts by defendant

• Evidence of real value; shows info is worth protecting through legal system

Page 14: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Rockwell Graphics

“Secrecy Continuum”

PerfectSecrecy

NoSecrecy

Tell No One Publication

Don’t Publish/No Efforts

Share withConfidentiality

Page 15: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Elements of a Trade Secret Action

• Eligible Subject Matter– Information that derives economic

value from being kept secret– Must be secret

• Reasonable Precautions to Keep Secret [P. 36, UTSA; compare Rest. 3d p. 54]

• Misappropriation

Page 16: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.
Page 17: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

The handwritten recipe that launched a fast-food dynasty and made Colonel Harland Sanders world famous is locked away at KFC headquarters—its contents so guarded that not even the chain’s top executive knows the ingredients. . . . Only a few people know the recipe and are sworn to secrecy. The employees have access to the recipe because of their roles making sure suppliers and KFC live up to Sanders’ culinary legacy. Two companies supply the herbs and spices, but their knowledge of the recipe is limited. Each supplier formulates only part of the ingredients . . . and neither supplier knows the other’s identity. The Colonel’s own handwritten recipe is tucked away in a safe at KFC headquarters. As a backup, KFC has portions of the recipe locked away in safety deposit boxes at undisclosed places elsewhere around the country.

The handwritten recipe that launched a fast-food dynasty and made Colonel Harland Sanders world famous is locked away at KFC headquarters—its contents so guarded that not even the chain’s top executive knows the ingredients. . . . Only a few people know the recipe and are sworn to secrecy. The employees have access to the recipe because of their roles making sure suppliers and KFC live up to Sanders’ culinary legacy. Two companies supply the herbs and spices, but their knowledge of the recipe is limited. Each supplier formulates only part of the ingredients . . . and neither supplier knows the other’s identity. The Colonel’s own handwritten recipe is tucked away in a safe at KFC headquarters. As a backup, KFC has portions of the recipe locked away in safety deposit boxes at undisclosed places elsewhere around the country.

Page 18: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Disclosure of Trade Secret: P. 58

Publication

Revealed when sell product

Disclosure by third party

Inadvertent disclosure

Government-required publication

Page 19: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Improper means

• DuPont v. Christopher

• Overflight not per se illegal

• Was it wrongful?

Page 20: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

DuPont

• Tests difference between 2 conceptions of TS law mentioned by Posner

– Tort/ethics

– Property/incentive

Page 21: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

DuPont holding

• Overflight is “improper means”

• TS law in Texas supports “higher standards of commercial morality in the business world”

Page 22: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Confidential Relationship

• Smith v. Dravo

Page 23: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.
Page 24: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.
Page 25: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.
Page 26: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.
Page 27: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.
Page 28: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.
Page 29: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Dravo

• Classic “squeezeout” case

• Interested buyer obtains info from would-be seller; then squeezes that seller out by entering the business/making the product themselves

Page 30: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Confidential relationship

• Why necessary?

– Secrecy; reasonable precautions: duty

• Established here?

– Implied duty: Steel Car Co. case, p. 69– Compare Omnitech p. 70; Rest 3d., p. 71

Page 31: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

A Transactional View of Property Rights, 20 Berkeley

Tech. L.J. 1477 (2005)

Robert P. Merges

Page 32: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Property Rights Create a Legal “Field” Around an Information Asset (i), Protecting Seller (S)

During Buyer’s (B) Precontractual Evaluation

BS i

Page 33: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Reverse Engineering

• Kadant v. Seely Machine

Page 34: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.
Page 35: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

• Corlew’s work history

• Reverse engineering of nozzles and other items

• 1.7 years to duplicate?

Page 36: Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09.

Restatement of Torts § 757

A trade secret may consist of any formula, pattern, device, or compilation of information which is used in one’s business, and which gives him an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it. It may be a chemical compound, a process of manufacturing, treating, or preserving materials, a pattern for a machine or other device or a list of customers.