TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES · PDF fileol PCH'.s. ilic highest being in the fat of tunics...

13
I. I -.1 .KV 1980 t^e ilitle effects TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES' 1 It I V. I'AIKH I. i ill. Im i In- cvaln.i .<! I I ..wi.il WJM.- ...),. .,! MnliotU I.. i t.«*» .U '.|«'i-. Tri li. MN 1-. 1i.ii<.t}Hilis. Intl. WllTd II. SliilU! Assoriaie Wildlife l'ailn>l«Kr. New Yoik State Dr|»iiiiin>-iii Ktivhiinmemal O«iM-rv.iiin En'k Kniittt Stanley A. lint kits Kesriuili Associate in Ko'i'«i;v Haul College lILsiulu^y Technician New Yoik State IV|>.iilin> in <•! Knviromnemal CoiiM-rv.iii«"> AllSTHACT Sciecu-il tissues liont S'J Mi.i|i|iinn nuilrs fiiiiti New York W.IH-I-. wrn-un.il. •-.! Im organcx idoiine coiiuiminanls. I hv.ii li-vrls of ui|;un<M lilorinei, i-*|in i.ill> i'< :H •.. wi-n- (.mini in the fat (e.);., a mean i>f U.Hiltl.OH |i|>in fur the s|x-i imens from il»- llml- .... i liu-n) I.U.II^HM^ turtles iroin the Hii<K»n Klvrr ;in<l .some oiliri IIH uliiii-i in tin- .Si.m- .<-cin uiiMiii.iliI,- Im human «uiiMtin|ition iM-caiiM- ul > tini;iiniiiatii»n til ilu-ir ttssut-s with |H-ISI-.I«-III |M»ltiii.ini'. li is t|lut the snapping tinilt- wuiiltl in.ikr ;i useful addition iln- :.|M-i-ii-<i M-^>) Im ^, 4110! 5ndinif. i iitniiJ.Hivc tniticuiiiA The snapping turili* (Chclyilra scififiitina) is a CHIIIHKMI, laijv . «nn- nivorous, aggressive, lu-sliwaici c.helonian that lias a wiili di-ariliiintin in the euiicrn United Siuies (<--ir|, 19!>2; l''.rnst and Uailxmi. I'.17^1 . v .nin- snapping tunics arc relatively srdc-maiy (I lammcr, I!)(>'.>) .mil Imi); hvi d. it was hy|«ithesizi-il that they would be an excellent specter, lot mumming pollutants in atpiaiic ecosystems. In addition, since ilteii -;kc!et.d mn .c!c, liver anij eggs aie used l«i luinian food (Roml>auei and H<-ckci I'.KSI; Seagcars, 1949; Angicr, 11170; Jlerity, 1U78). it appealed nnp»n.nti in ex- amine selected (issues (especially from specimens from die lieavilv I'CU- polluted Hudson River) lor level.s of organochloitue «nii.iniinani:. \ MATKIUAIJ; AND METHODS j Thirty-two snapping turtles were captured front various waleis in New .-• York (23 from the Hudson Kiver and nine from oihei l<n .diiics) .mil sub mitted to the Wildlife Pathology llnit of the St.ue Depanineoi «l Kn virontnental Gin.servation. The tunics were weiglietl ami ilu-n kdli-d by freezing or decapitation, alter which the plastron was leiuuvcd. Nmes were made on the general condition of the carcass and the di-.iiilniiioii ..I i.<.«lv fat. Samples ol selet leil tissues (fat, liver, skeletal mnsi I.- and i-j-.i •) weie plan-d in chemit ally i lean toniainets, dozen and sent in ih.n CIHI.IHI.<II in Raltech Scientilic Sen-ice;,, liu . at Madison (Wis.) 01 to ilie l)ep.i.iiin-ni\ Pollution Laboiatory at Kntne (N.Y.) where the levels ol s, veral •>' organoi lilorint- compounds weif determined by g;u> clinntiaiogiapli\ i I'.S. Food and Drug Adiniiiisiiatton, Il)(i8; Heath and Hill. I!>'H), .mil tail 'Thf jullinrs atkiKiwledKr lln- .ISMM.IIIII- ol 111. James I'own* MI M..IIMI. .il .iu.ily.i-. .i>.l t>.ivul Seyinxiu in obiuinnig mulrs limn tin- lluiUoii Kiver. 317770

Transcript of TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES · PDF fileol PCH'.s. ilic highest being in the fat of tunics...

Page 1: TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES · PDF fileol PCH'.s. ilic highest being in the fat of tunics from the Hud ... !?fg^ivf' J.^L'ijr'^vJfi fo! P*fS T»Hir 1. Toxir.AMv_S iNSAMrirx

I. I -.1 .KV 1980

t^e i l i t l e effects TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES'

1 It I V. I ' A I K H I.i ill. Im i In- cvaln.i.<! I I ..wi.il WJM.-

...),. .,! MnliotU I.. it.«*» .U '.|«'i-. Tri li.

MN 1-. 1i.ii<.t}Hilis. Intl.

WllTd II. SliilU! Assoriaie Wildlife l'ailn>l«Kr.New Yoik State Dr|»i i i i in>-i i i

Ktivhiinmemal O«iM-rv.iiin

En'k Kniittt

Stanley A. lint kits

Kesriuili Associate in Ko'i'«i;vHaul College

lILsiulu^y TechnicianNew Yoik State IV|>.iil in> in <•!

Knviromnemal CoiiM-rv.iii«">

AllSTHACT

Sciecu-il tissues liont S'J Mi.i|i |iinn nuilrs fi i i i t i New York W.IH-I - . w r n - u n . i l . •-.! Imorgancx idoiine coiiuiminanls. I hv.ii li-vrls of ui|;un<M lilorinei, i-*|in i . i l l> i'< :H •.. wi-n- ( . m i n i inthe fat (e.);., a mean i>f U.Hiltl.OH |i|>in fur the s|x-i imens from il»- llml-....i liu-n) I.U.II^HM^turtles iroin the Hii<K»n Klvrr ;in<l .some oiliri IIH uliiii-i in t in- .Si.m- .<-cin u i iMi i i . i l i I , - Imhuman «uiiMtin|ition iM-caiiM- ul > tini;i iniiiatii»n til ilu-ir ttssut-s with |H-ISI - . I« - I I I |M»ltiii . ini'. li is

t|lut the snapping t i n i l t - wuiiltl in.ikr ;i useful addition M« i l n - :.|M-i-ii-<i M - ^ > ) Im^, 4110! 5ndinif. i i itniiJ.Hivc tniticuiiiA

The snapping turili* (Chclyilra scififiitina) is a C H I I I H K M I , la i jv . « n n -nivorous, aggressive, lu-sl iwaici c.helonian that lias a wi i l i d i - a r i l i i i n t i n inthe euiicrn United Siuies ( < - - i r | , 19!>2; l''.rnst and U a i l x m i . I'.17^1 .v.nin-snapping tunics arc relatively srdc-maiy (I lammcr, I!)(>'.>) .mil Imi); hvi d. itwas hy|«ithesizi-il that they would be an excellent specter, lot mummingpollutants in atpiaiic ecosystems. In addition, since i l te i i -;kc!et.d mn .c!c,liver anij eggs aie used l«i luinian food (Roml>auei and H<-ckci I'.KSI;Seagcars, 1949; Angicr, 11170; Jlerity, 1U78). it appealed nnp»n.nti in ex-amine selected (issues (especially from specimens from die lieavilv I'CU-polluted Hudson River) lor level.s of organochloitue «nii.iniinani:.

\ MATKIUAIJ; AND METHODS

j Thirty-two snapping turtles were captured front various waleis in New.-• York (23 from the Hudson Kiver and nine from oihei l<n .diiics) .mil sub

mitted to the Wildlife Pathology l lni t of the St.ue Depanineoi «l Knvirontnental Gin.servation. The tunics were weiglietl ami ilu-n kdli-d byfreezing or decapitation, alter which the plastron was leiuuvcd. Nmes weremade on the general condition of the carcass and the di-.iiilniiioii ..I i.<.«lvfat. Samples ol selet leil tissues (fat, liver, skeletal mnsi I.- and i-j-.i •) weieplan-d in chemit ally i lean tonia inets , dozen and sent in ih.n C I H I . I H I . < I I inRaltech Scientilic Sen-ice;,, liu . at Madison (Wis.) 01 to i l ie l)ep.i . i i in-ni\Pollution Laboiatory at Kntne ( N . Y . ) where the levels ol s, v e r a l

•>' organoi lilorint- compounds weif determined by g;u> c l i n n t i a i o g i a p l i \ i I '.S.Food and Drug Adini i i i s i ia t ton , Il)(i8; Heath and Hi l l . I!>'H), .mil t a i l

'Thf jullinrs atkiKiwledKr lln- .ISMM.IIIII- ol 111. James I'own* MI M..IIMI. .il .iu.ily.i-. .i>.l t>.ivulSeyinxiu in obiuinnig mulrs l imn t in- lluiUoii Kiver.

317770

Page 2: TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES · PDF fileol PCH'.s. ilic highest being in the fat of tunics from the Hud ... !?fg^ivf' J.^L'ijr'^vJfi fo! P*fS T»Hir 1. Toxir.AMv_S iNSAMrirx

10

(i»|iloihii

In;.pi-inull .WinI ' l It',t i n - ninn. i|M.- |

15. «v.ni . i lapp}<l )

N i v \ V I I R K F IMI AMI G A M I J . I M K N M , Ym.. 27 , N" 1 , JAM

i and mercury i oru'cni lai ions by atomic absorpti*• •lomi t r y . The analyses of l.n samples were made on a faid. i ta lepresenl wet weight .. iddi t i . in to the tissues themselves, tut lie soup was madeiicns. One was a lunle taken Ju ly ',!(). l!(78 front the Huds<(•••Urn l-'ord iildwaid. and ihr niliri was one taken July 31, '• Creek in Washington Conntv. Hotl i had high conccm

in (heir fa t . l.ivet and skeletal mii'.clc were used j i r imar i li i i l e l iom While deck a sp>. ial e l fo i t was made to disv

• >l the fat as possible hum (he mtf.i Ic tissue. The siicd ai cording to the recipe ol Scageat:. (1949).ause of the relatively small samples and apparent diffcl i l i i y lor the several (issues examined, /-'lesis weir first perf.

iale comparisons, and Iheii (he /'test (Stccle and Torrieused to compare diflrtrm••••; between the resultant mea>

K i.MILTS

'1 he (issues examined comprised fat samples from 20 tut 'samples from 31 specimens, skeletal muscle samples from 29 :•and egj;s from six specimens. The levels ol polycldorinated '(I 'CH's). the DDT metabolite DDK. and the insecticide Dieldrit

'lisMM'.s ate summarized in Tables 1 in -1. All samples* had detect,ol PCH'.s. i l ic highest being in the fat of tunics from the Hud(me in ",!)f)0.60 ppm). while com mirations in the |at of nine ••l iom otliei localities avetaged •!(»•!. I (i pjim. Ten (5K.H per cent)lai ' .imples tha t weir tested for Dieldi iu had high rtmccntratioppm). ami live (31.2 pei cent) of the Hi tested for DDJ'l had conc>i;ir;ii. i t h a n f> ppm. A male t u l l l e l iom Irondequoit (lay on Lai"dial \vcii;hrd 16.4 kilogtams had u-sidtic lcv<-ls(ppm) in its fat aPCI'. .. i i f i f i . O ; DDE. HI..'5: Dic ldi in , :}-!.!: hexacl»loiubc-nzcne. 0aebl.ii epoxide. 19.7; and M i i e x , l ' t .7.

C..IK e i i t i . t t ions of I'CH'.s in '22 l ivei samples from turtles fromson Kive r averaged lifi.Of) p f im , and eight livers from turtles fiv.ati is had a mean ol 7.77 ppm. Concentrations of DiM1' and Dicl'

alb' low in the liveis, but l l ieie weie oci asional exceptions {'I be liver ol the male t u i i l e from lionde<|uoii Hay al teady menti

• In,- levels (ppm) as h.llows: I'CH's. 27.H: DDE. 3.58; Dtcld.hexa- hlorobenzenc, 0.2-1; heptaddor epoxide, 0.8.1; Mirex, t1

men ni.y. 2.72.In i ont ias t , skclctill muscle I to t t i '2'2 samples from itinles From

sou river averaged 4.2-1 ppm for Pi Ill's with live of them (22.7 .

1 !)80

sprr-.isis: nil

>m iwol.'ivi-r 8;• (nuninn*, of-ml lor"in ;is

•• wt-rc

m i-s inned for'I'iO. p.alues.

v liver' iiwnspbeiiyls

" these'i- l<'vclsi River

•i iincns' the 17

'.> 0.3'i at ions)ni:irio

: .i-p-

•-.: Huci -•i other

• ii« wereible2) .Til had•. 0.{)9;I : and

•e Hud-•i cent)

I lu- .untin.! • > • «

rxiiininrd lnl;il l i-i l HI In1! writ* |MM»li*tt.

317771

Page 3: TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES · PDF fileol PCH'.s. ilic highest being in the fat of tunics from the Hud ... !?fg^ivf' J.^L'ijr'^vJfi fo! P*fS T»Hir 1. Toxir.AMv_S iNSAMrirx

•r lift- • - .~

s ~.

- -

•1 .'•**£&•$?*&'!*?. in--' •'•>;<rW«(i»'*^t»« •**'&*' yVI -to/ - <«. v>* '>&*? ft *s

1 r'.. '." r.. j-c " '" 'JET' MM*:!?fg^ivf' J.^L'ijr'^vJfi

f o ! P*fS

T»Hir 1. Toxir.AMS iNSAMrirx<T|FtrTmir. FR<IM SNAPPING TIIR nr* FROM VARIOUS I.OCAI nirs IN- NFW YOXK

v_^1 oralirv

North Dav (near Tiroli) ,Nnnh Bav (near Tivoli> ^V x\Constitution Island Marsh ^ x A/"\ »Piermom Marsh *"" ^ \ ,- \North Bav (near Ti«oli> ^ . <\ *Vandertmrgh Cove tnear Siaatsbure- ^ *Vandrtbuich Cove (near Staa-fburc1

Surkiev C.me tnrar Staat-bur::North Bav inear Hudson!6 tnil« Itelow Fon Edward8 mil« hrlow Fort EduardMran

Otsrlit Kiter Inear Cincinnaiu:<Spring 1 airs (Dutchess Co. IBlack Pond Inear tllisburg. (effrrson Co.)Black Pond (near Ellisburq. Jrlferson Co.)Si. Lawrence River (neat MomsiownlWhite C.rrek (Washington Co.)Bi-ik Crftk Mat'h -r-r. r.ui: •• ;:l.ir J. Mr-arv C«. iBlatk Creek Marsh Inra: (lUMC'sla;,.: Aitiam Co.)iiitn-i* -|u«-ii B-1'. •! .i» • • • - •> •

DateHudson River

June H. 1976|une H. 1974Mav 19. 1977May 26. 1977|une IJ. 1977June 13. 1977June 15. 1977

Sex

FemaleMaleMaleMaleMaleMaleMale

|unc:t. !97" FemaleJune 22. 1977Julv 20. 1976Julv20 1978

Osher watfrsMav'.'. 1977June 23. 1977une 12. 1978une 12. 1978une 12. 1978ulv 31. 1978

Septrnilirr 13. 197*

MaieMaleMale

————FemaleFemaleFemaleFemaleFemaleMaleMale

i September 13. I97S Mal?«..:tti-rnb-: -° !"T<; ' \h'-

Gross

Ikiloeramsl

4.22.04.61.5

10.215.4!i.63 54 59.12.76.5,

2.32.92.92.72.43.491

i *•-'1 im

Toxicam*

I'CHs j DDE I

306§

4,319628

I.69B7.9905.4121.123

.'...=7.ii8

6422.990.60

yy 944.4

335410310

2.281SOS

f 0.36! fifin—————— . — __j~. —

< 5.00§

57 50n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.

15 JO,

<ll II

0.141 43.408.408.80n.d.0.060.02

1 «Mn- — . , . .

Dieldrin

4 0.20§

J.801.500.50

26.5012.801700

':!•< 6 45

n.d.n.d.1.602.40n.d.n.d.0.06rid

1 :U in

lissnr samplri Honi ln:<

CO

j^

Page 4: TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES · PDF fileol PCH'.s. ilic highest being in the fat of tunics from the Hud ... !?fg^ivf' J.^L'ijr'^vJfi fo! P*fS T»Hir 1. Toxir.AMv_S iNSAMrirx

* V .. T '-"..' .. I »».. ' > \t

* '

T»mr 2. T'»\H:\M«. IN S\Mi'i f- 'fl I.IMH TV---II FRIIM Ss»i'i'i\«. T' Rill1- FROM X'»mcii s I.IK:<I inrs IN Nf»* YORK

\ — • 1

\ oraliiv Hair Sex

Gross»<r:<h:

Ikilneraiml

Toxicant*

Pf.B'* ni>K ri:-i.irinllmkon Rrer

Nonr. Bay incar Tiuilit June it. Iy76Nonh Bay (near Tivoli)Consiiluiion Island MarshConstitution liland MarshConstitution Island MarshConstitution Island MarshPiermont Marsh

June 14. 1976June 15. 1976June 15. 1976Nlav 19. 1977Mav 19. 1977Mav 26. 1977

Pierrnom Marsh ! Max 26 1977North Bay (near Tivoli)Vandetburgh Cove (near Staatsburg)Nonh Bay (near Tivoli)Kingston PointKinesion Point

June 13. 1977une IS. ir«une 14. lij?7une 15. 1977une 15. 1977

Vanderburgh Cove t near Staatsburgi une 15. 1977lona Island Marshloru Island Marshlona Island Marshlona Island MarshSucklev Cove tnear Staatsburgi ,North Bay (near Hudson)8 miles below Fort Edward8 miles below Fort Edward

June 20. 197*June 20. 1977June 20. 1977June 20. 1977June 21. 1977June 22. 19/7July 20. 1978lulv 20. 1978

8 milrn brlow fan Edward • i lulv 31. I97f»

FemaleMaleFemaleFemaleMaleMaleMaleFemaleMal*MateFemaleFemaleFemaleMaleMaleMaleMaleMaleFemaieMaleMaleMaleMale

Mean

4 i2.03.84.68.6t o1.5S.8

10.215.4S.99.15.4

iO.o'J '; "j§

6.9511 5045.80

9.421.793 130 5 4

103.0021 12

107.00

§0.91

<0.05063

009005n.d.

0.33

73 90 ' . .

• ' ' . IT$

n".d.0.0260.16

nnl70.038

• •

136 ! !7».i!0 . ' ..5.30 42.20.93.54.89.12.72 7

91. «l 2.M4.65 0011.792 00

004001

45 12 0.99 i2.50

683.009.21

21 an

0.1717.40n.d.0 7 1

ill) | lift (>'. |< | i')

0086n.d.nil0 <I\H

O>

x2

N:-i

toooa

ii Oihfr watersSpring Lakes (Duiihcss Co.)Black Pond (near Ellisburg. JeffersonBlack Pond (near F.llisburg. JeffersonSt. l.awremre River (near MnrrisinwnWhite Clerk (Wa>hin<ioti Cu.iBlatl C'i«'<-k M.tnli ii'i-ar (".iiililril.inil

Iniiiilfiiiiiiil Hit tl..iLi> I liu nun

Co.)Co.)

Ml'anv Co >

Jinn- 23. 1977June 12. 1978June 12. 1978June 12 I97!>julv .-.. ItTiSriucinlii'i 13. l'.'7<

Si'iiii-nvliri ill I«I7S

FemaleFemaleFemaleFemaleMaleMali-

i Mil.-

2222

iHi

997I^1

1

037

211

"._.;

103010in...

•><)

Ml

10.0380 019n 77 1•n. Ml ,ml '

.1 riS 1

0.0300700f»a J::•.!

,, .,.,

Page 5: TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES · PDF fileol PCH'.s. ilic highest being in the fat of tunics from the Hud ... !?fg^ivf' J.^L'ijr'^vJfi fo! P*fS T»Hir 1. Toxir.AMv_S iNSAMrirx

OtlirrSpring Lakes (Dutches* Co.)Black I'onil (near Elli<l>mK. |rffer»on Co.)Black fond (near Elluliuru. |r!:ViKm Co.)Si. t.awrrncr Riirr incar Mi>iri::i<»nlU'| !ir r-'-ri ••AV.-i«!nr«-i- • fiiuif. 1. tin. Maisliiiiui <tu,,.-; : ,.ii... iiu.cn. (.11. 1Black Creek Marsh (near Guildtrland. Albanv Co.)Irnndequoii Bay (Lake Ontario!

June 23, 1977June 12. 1978IIMIC 12. 1978

FemaleFemaleFemale

jiinr 12. 1978 rrm.i!<

2.92.92.;2 1

In!' ?! l»7« ' \\3\- "' 1

0.48S.SO7.10

21 40I 30

bf|iU'iniici Ij. ii'Ta M.I.I :• i ".-!'Sepiember IS. 1978September 20. 1978

MaleMale

M.-an

8.216.460

0.1027.80

7.77

, .

0.0380.0490 77n.n|

0.03007O.OHn,l

ii. >. !,...n.d.3.580.64

n.d.0.99017

*Data in ppm on wet weight basis: n.d. indicates substance was tested for but not delectablejaTissue samples from this specimen pooled with those nom preceding spedmen.

COH-J-4

Page 6: TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES · PDF fileol PCH'.s. ilic highest being in the fat of tunics from the Hud ... !?fg^ivf' J.^L'ijr'^vJfi fo! P*fS T»Hir 1. Toxir.AMv_S iNSAMrirx

•"'V,»y^i .>#

i*-j.-v*'i'''"j-.*'.• -i . i.'..; '.n'::.-.; ";: ' Ji..'.-•<' -,', '..'

^^ii ••*;••V XI

•\tf

J^.^:

I ABLE 3. lOMClM* IN iVMFI.fji'f IKM! I il .Ml M..r I i-;-.

\^/

Locality I

North Bay (near Tivoli) 1North Bay (near Tivoli)Conuiiuuon island MarshConitituiion Island MarshConstitution Island MarshConstitution Island MarshPiermont MarshPieiinuiic MarshNorth Bay (near Tivoli 1\'aRderburgh Cove inear StaaisburetNorth Bay (near Tivoli)Kioeston PointKingston PointVanderburgh Cove (near Staatssburg)lona Island Marsh xlona Island Marshlona Island Marshlona Island MarshSuckle* Cove (near Sraatsburg)Nonh Ba\ Inrar Hudson)S miles below Ford Edward8 miles below Fort Edward8 miles below Fori EdwardMean

1

Date |Hudson River

une 14. 1976une 14. 1976•me 15. 1976une 15. 1976

Mav 19. 1977May 19. 1977Mav 26. 1977Mav 26. 1977une IS. 1977une 1?. 1977une 1-J. i?77une 15. 1977une 15. 1977

June 15. 19771 |une 20. 1977

"June 20. i?77June 20. 1977June 20. 1977|une21. 1977June 22. 1977J.ilv 20, 1978

I July 20. 1978July SI. 1973

Sex |

FemaleMaleFemaleFemaleMaleMaleMaleFemaleMaleMateFe-.aie-MaleFemaleMaleMaleMale

1 Male| Male' Femalei Male| Mxiei Male

dale

Crossweieht

I kilograms 1 (

4.2 12.0J.8 !4.68.61.01.53.9

10.215.4j.J9.15.4

13.65.30.42.20.9S.54.89.12.72.75.16

•"

PCS!

It. 46§0.671.63J45OJ10.200.471 01

15.70ft r J

l.ii1.02

| 2^07•T 52u.i*0.26

27.62o.;s::.401032:50

; 4.24.'

.••.::;:::'

DDE

<05§

0.015< 0.05

nd.n.d.0.01001n.d.

o'ci

1 0^05n..i.n.c.

1 < 0.010.74

<. 0 010.26ii.l

1 n.d.| 0093

Oicki;:n

0.019§

n.d.0.01n.d.

n'.d.0.01

- -

'

1 •:

n'd.0034n.d.0.008

:..«! ifl..... I*.....b IIV •ttiimilttii (!ll.l In I

028 ,n 3? I <OOIO| 001

;. .I.Jis. < 0 Jln Vl i 00131 < 001. i

•li -' » .3 «• *^

Page 7: TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES · PDF fileol PCH'.s. ilic highest being in the fat of tunics from the Hud ... !?fg^ivf' J.^L'ijr'^vJfi fo! P*fS T»Hir 1. Toxir.AMv_S iNSAMrirx

0 28o :w I < o 010! n 01(I HI | O.ll2fi! <•' I'n i.i ' o n't ' .? " "'

S|illtlC l..li*^ llltl

DUik I'uml Inrat1 ......

July Jl. l'J7bSeptember 20. 1978While Creek (Washington Co.)

Irondequoit Bay (Lake Ontario)

•Data in ppn on wet weieht basii: n.d. indicates substance was tested for but not detectable§Tissnc samples from this spranren pooled with those rram preceding specimen.

^M.tk?-vife!^

Page 8: TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES · PDF fileol PCH'.s. ilic highest being in the fat of tunics from the Hud ... !?fg^ivf' J.^L'ijr'^vJfi fo! P*fS T»Hir 1. Toxir.AMv_S iNSAMrirx

«• n:il.- l'«l">. !•>!.' '.?«.•

fc mile* IN'IIIW Ini /.:

|nl» 20. IJI7S.li Mi '." . ti

M-in

M.ilr » I

^____ I.

'* ffiffi ! -''"^

Spring Lakes (Dutches* Co.)Black Pond (near Ellisburg. Jeffenon Co.)Black fond (near Ellisburg. Jefferson Co.)Si. Lawrence River (near Morristown)\Vliiic Creek (Washington Co. IInmdequoit Bav (Lake Oniariol

JUIIU Jj. *V( t

June 12. 1978June 12. 1978June 12, 1978Julv 31. 1978September '.'0. 1978

1 1 nunFemaleFemaleFemaleMaleMale

2.9Z.72.43.4

16 43,12

0.390.810.340.480.360.44

< 0.0100.0250.01300420.0^3

<0.023

0.01< 0 01< 0.01

nd.0.16

« 0.038^

•Data in ppm on wel weight basis; n.d. indkates lubstance was tested for but not detectable.STUsue samples from this" specimen pooled with those from preceding specimen.

COH

, vj*• ^J

1 ^J

\ <l

Page 9: TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES · PDF fileol PCH'.s. ilic highest being in the fat of tunics from the Hud ... !?fg^ivf' J.^L'ijr'^vJfi fo! P*fS T»Hir 1. Toxir.AMv_S iNSAMrirx

•'*• V" •' •., .'..../'., /..,.";...,•!• .V.I..

TABLE 4. TOXICANTS IN Eccs OF SNAPPING TLHTLIS FROM THE HLDSON RIVER

"Of parent female.§Data in ppm.

Locality |Nonb Bay i near Tivolit ; JuneConstiruiion Island Marsh '> JuneConstitution Island Marsh ' JunePicrmom Marsh MayNorth Bay (near Tivolil i JuneSuckley Cove (near Staatsburel ' June

Date14.15.!5.:!*.14.21.

197619761976197719771977

Mean |

Grossweight'

(kilograms)4.23.84.6S.3S.9V5S.97

Toxicamg

PCB's17.942.9I3.T10.420?a.i •

| 289

' DDE<0.05<0.05

O.-o0.055

< 0.18

Dieldrin0.0220019

< 0.0500.014001}0.055

< 0 0)5

I '<

z

O

Page 10: TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES · PDF fileol PCH'.s. ilic highest being in the fat of tunics from the Hud ... !?fg^ivf' J.^L'ijr'^vJfi fo! P*fS T»Hir 1. Toxir.AMv_S iNSAMrirx

p.'- .\SNAI'l»INc;Tl'KTI.KS - SttlHC fl til. 17

exceeding > ppm. Such tissues from six turtles from other localitiesaveraged t. 14 ppm. The levels of DDK anil Dieidrin in skeletal must lewere all u> Ue low. ,f4\

\L,All six . ;g samples yyere from ttlfiles from the Hudson River ami li.id «*"consider:!! le concentrations (> 5.0 ppm) of PCB's (mean = 2H.SJ ppm).Levels of i -DE and Dieidrin were low.

Tests (• statistical differences hetwccn turtles from the Hudson Rive.iand thus, irom other localities, w i t h it-spoil to mean concentrations ofPCB's in i:.e fat, liver and skeletal imisde, are summarized in Tallies 5 and6. Both tl . .- F and /'tests indicated that iherr were significant diffeieixes. ^\for the ti;. ues analyzed, between the two arras. jo"

The soi.ji made frorn the turtle from the Hudson River yielded 230 ppm *rof PCBV vhile that from the one from While Creek yielded O.O'.H ppm. Asingle ! > < > • 1 of the former (2.r>() miUiliteis = 270 grams) would eoutaio .1dose of (Jp,.l milligrams of P< Ws. The tissues analyzed for the tur t le fminthe I I t u U u River showed PCJl levels ol 7.2!>H in its fa t , 683 ppm in its hveiand II. I ppm in its skeletal muscle. Tim corresponding values I'oi dieothei t u i . l e were 2.281, l.'l and 0.5 ppm, respectivcly. Despite th<- l .x lthai the i.irtle froni White Creek had lower amounts of PCB's in its tis-.m-sthan tin- ->ne from the Hudson River, rrmuving (he fat from tlur portionsused in |>. '-paring tho soup apparently was effective in reducing the relativeamount >.i it to a much greater degree.

T»m i "i. KKMJI is <>i /•''fwis »i I I I K \ 'AKiANi:t nt I'CB OiN«:tNTR*nciNN IN Tissi'i.s >**SNAfl'INt; "1'llH II K.S i;N»M l i l t l l l l l l M I M K|*TK VS Ol t l tK l.OT.AI.IIItl IN Ni U VoHK

_ tlv

Livci

Slrll-l.ll H. isclc

•.siitmfii. i »i p - < u.mii.

cle

LocalityHudson KivrrOlder

(Iiidkon KivrrOilier

tlu<U»n KivcrUihcr

NiimlicrIII

U

22H

(i

Sum ofstfiiarn

8. ill 1.722. 49512.102.88

21,200.77116.52

_ __ 0.<M

Value•.1 ;••

l/.-ll.'

!«....!..

l.l-.'l.l!.'

•t<*

1

1i

.I MU t i> KKSIU.T!> »f /'Ttxii in Dim HI N<:IS lit I W I K N Mi.AN VALUES I-'IHI I't :il i .<>N> IN

i KA I IHN-. IN 1'issiiKs Hi SNAITIM. 1 t u t i | i.s FKIIM nil H<I I>M>N Kiv 11' vs i t m i Kt.OCAl Mil s |N Nl-VV V ' l H K

SL< Icul > nisi it

Oitiral2.261.7S1.7S

Viilm- nj /'.I »ili •ilaifil

•J .'l9«

I 113':: (••!•

.IK a« /' < tl llfi.

317779

Page 11: TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES · PDF fileol PCH'.s. ilic highest being in the fat of tunics from the Hud ... !?fg^ivf' J.^L'ijr'^vJfi fo! P*fS T»Hir 1. Toxir.AMv_S iNSAMrirx

ii-1•18 Y I I K K FISH AMI ('.AMI•• J o i ' K N A i . . Voi. 27, No 1. JANUAI

$;- ...-A*•.K?'5TV

••V3*:?*;«•i.t^ssS

^

*y?

'1 l» iwn snapping turtles whose (issue samples wctc pooled we- • bothinken < > i t J inn- 14, 19"(i from North Hay at Tlvoli on the Hudson Ilivrr.Tin- pooled sample of liver and dial oFskeletal muscle rarh had Us thanO.Oli ppm of radmium. However, for four Ilirllcs from llle Hudson 1' ivcrat(".oust 11 in ion Island Mnish , Iwo taken on June l i » , 1976 nnd two on N ' a y H).I'.>/"/, t i n - ni i- . tn and range of radiii inni coiicenl rations were 16.9' ( R . r > H -li(>.'.!») ppiu in ihc liver and 0.77 (().!'.! • 1.-I1) ppm in the skeletal > -usilr.I ' m i l i - . vfitt to !>e aide IO tolerale large, conccntralions of caminin

(Ri i l i i i r .un and Wells, 197fi), bill I 'uiihcr icscan-h is needed.

IH.xci I:;SION

I In s<- il;iia demonstrate that tin- I'm. liver and eggs (Iissues thai usuallycontain higher lipid levels than othei tissues) of snapping turtles • ontaiugiiMii-i concentrations of organnchlotinc loxicants than doesskele< >1 mus-cle. They also indicate that Uinles from the Hudson River :>ntn insignii iranily higher levels of PCtJ's than turtles front Hie other lf:-aliticsfrom which specimens were obtained. In addition to toxicants i ••rivedthioui'Ji diet, the snapping turllr may acquire hydropjiobic comi ninds,six h .is I'tHl's, through its mucous membranes <luring aquatic pha vn^rnland cloacal respiration (Hammer, 1!)()9).

Th>- U.S. Food and Drug Administration has recognized no ixvifictoleraiu-es 01 action levels For deleteiious subsiances III snapping miles.However, the agency's sanctioned levels for human consumption ol 'he cd-ihle |.oi(inn of Fish are a.s Follows: 1'CIV.s, 5.0; DDE. 5.0; Dickli .. 0 li;heptai hlnr epoxide, 0.3: Mircx, 0.1; atitl meicury, 1.0 (U.S. F'- -d nndHi HI; Adiuinistrai ion. P.I7H).

In liul ' i ol the findings of the present study, snapping turtles h un theHudson Kivrr, below Hudson Falls-Fort Kdwaid, appear unsafe foi '<u innncousinnpi ion. Although the skelclal muscle- was generally '«»w inoigaiMK-hlonne residues, leaving a small amount of fat on the me:" couldresult in elevated contaminant levels in soups and stews. In recii -s tlutalso use i he liver and/or eggs, the tisk of high levels of con tarn i- .ints iseven c.reatcr. More data are needed For snapping turtles from L;'Ue On-tat io an<! other areas (e.g., Lake Erie, Onondagrt Lake an-' LakeChamplain), but the data For the specimens from Irortdequoit Bay <tt:gcstthai i i inirs from Lake Ontario may also hr unfit for hUman consu> -piion.Snapping tin lies taken anywheie should he prepared carefully a' ' evensmall .inmunts of fat as well as the liver rejected as human food.

I .it ilr it-search has been done on pesticides and industrial pollt: -nts inreptiles. Snakes have been proposed as pollution-indicator species ( .modect al.. 15)75). and alarmingly high levels of some orgatwchlorine i- -teamswete loiind in the body fat of a sltiall sample of Indigo snakes (Dry?' irrhoncintii-.) Fioin Georgia (l.awlcr, 1977). However, the concentr.v "ns of

III VII . .

I 1(1.1

a i

*«'i

317780

Page 12: TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES · PDF fileol PCH'.s. ilic highest being in the fat of tunics from the Hud ... !?fg^ivf' J.^L'ijr'^vJfi fo! P*fS T»Hir 1. Toxir.AMv_S iNSAMrirx

If-

TuXICAN'ISl:..'.

organochloriiitsnapping tm: l

The a<l i |> .throughout i l lpollutant coo.can be conip.water. Age ca.from carapacelike formalioi.19(>8; Hamitic ,lipid-solublc i ifor (iC/mass •dinxin, diln 11.

Snapping iiison River (< .:pollutants haHowever, ICMand other pollthe hatchahilii

In additionfor toxicologytral side ol ih<of the him! lin.arc discrete fa.neck regions. .laboratory i h

ruiS—S/ime <•<

reported in these snakes wen- lower than ihose found induring the present study in Ni-w York.

tissue may accumulate organochlorine toxicants>ifc of a turtle. In older lo nioniioi trends in the drgiee of.nination, t|ic concentrations of .specific toxic substant'--,;-d according to a)«e for tunics 1'iom selected bodies ol'

> be estimated from counts ol scuic annul i (small tunles)..•ngth and. perhaps, by mirioscopicaHy counting the rin-4-in sections of the long hones ol larger turtles (Gibbons,

i I960). Since snapping innlrs hold high concentrations ofi taminanis in theii lat bodies, these organs should ho iclc.ilc.ctrophotoinetry analysis for a variety n(*"impounds (e.g..luran and nolynuclear aromatic liydrocarbons).ilcs appeared to be abundant, at least locally, in the-Hint

North liny at Tivoli, Van-lei burgh Cove), so chemical'not noticeably i educed imputations in those aiea*.

ich is neei|«-d coni-crrning t in - impact of organochlorines.-.ants on the health and heh.wioi of snapping turtle:, and

of their eggs.he snapping turtle should piove u useful laboratory anim.d

i tidies. Large fat bodies (I 'otnl. 1!)7H) arc found on the VCH-•• turtles and extend from tin- vicinity «!' the medial aspect•s to, in obese individuals, the .uca of the heart. Also, ihetedeposits in the axial, pcriraiilial. and lateral and venual

. liese adipose tissues can he i|iiii kly and easily collecieil loruical analyses.

Am.im. B. 1!I70. ^mrmct C.«ikiii|< Fair I-ii-r."Sta< kj»'lr <:••., l larri>li i i i |>. I'a.llAI I MI.K. II. . IV I Sl'KNCKH ANII VV. WllH I I K. l!t7fl. 'I III- IIM' III'lliakra M |NllluMOII ill.lirul.il

k|fii«. <:..|...., •»75(2):3I.7 :»•«.CAKK A. I-'. I'M'.' ilandbook.il Turtles. CoiiiHI Huiv. I'H-V., lllui.i.F.u^^l C. II . x«. <. W. H A I C I H M I H 1872. 'I'liilli-Mtf tin lluiinl Siau-s. Ki-uiurky Uiiiv I'K-SH.

CIIII'IINS. J. \V 1 s. Growth uii-» of tin- inninioii UI.I|>|UIIK tunlr, Cln-lytira .\rrpruiinu. inj |Hilluii-*l . iv i I lrrpciol.mil.i ?'l:^Gf» -Ii7.

H A M - . H K . II A. •'.). Cjraiiifii-u i«f a in.iisli MI.I|I|IMII>, iiullr |iii|inl.iliiin. l-ii rn-li Krlin-i .S..Mili n.,U..ij ,,r. Wild! M|;| SS:i)!l!i IOUS

III MIL K. <• . < • S. A. Hut |!I7<1. Nun.in wiilc >nc HUM lil.ninr an.l inrrruiy II-M.IM. >ni»n.g» ul j.Kid nallarilt, .mil jiUfk elm ks <luiinn ilic I'.Mi'.l I U V I I l i i i i i i i i if; M-JX". 1'i-si.Miiniuu IIHII lf.3-10-1.

U l K i i v . J . IH7H • ij(i|)iu* luitlf (uln.*Oiil:iiii> Oul-iil HiMiit (Muu l i ) : l l i 18. 62.LAUI mil K. IV V. The sum* uj Dry inn n him i nrui\ • IHI/H-II (I lul l i i iHik ) llir rakirin in.lii;..

PUSH C. M. l'J7. Murjjhoiui^n j| as|>cri> .mil l|n inc. lijiui .il cousfi|tii'iuo of fill ili-.uil.icnun in « i l i l vi-i hraics. Annual Rev. !•'•«!. SyM. !>:fil' . l f i7l l .

KIII-.INSON K M \NI> M. K. Wl l.l-*i \'J'l'.i. Krirnlim. •>! .1 tiuglr in.il ilmf i»f railiniinn init\^uc» ul tin .tirt&lurU mule. 7*rii"iv^ ifitntft-t Hull Kiiviiu1!. twt iuuin. l i * & i * i « t

317781

Page 13: TOXICANTS IN SNAPPING TURTLES · PDF fileol PCH'.s. ilic highest being in the fat of tunics from the Hud ... !?fg^ivf' J.^L'ijr'^vJfi fo! P*fS T»Hir 1. Toxir.AMv_S iNSAMrirx

rr*

81

;«J

-*«

NlW V , , , - K I - I S I I AND {'.AMI- J O I ' H N A I , Vi . l 27. No I . J A N U A R Y l!

r .«i.\m. I v. XM. M. R. H W : K I M IM'i l .Jov »f O«.kmB. Bol.hs Mrrr i l l t^ i . . Indiana , .-.. ...i \v i: II l'i.|ti Snapping liinlr. N.Y.S (U.t.M-iva«iimi«i 1:10.• . , , , |> «. M \NM |. II. Tonim. MMiO. Tiin. ipl'". J"'l I'MM riliirrs of Shuixiirs. Mr<.

i l i l l l l i«iL i •• . Nr« 'Viirk., I . . H H . \ -. iv-i'c. \ H M I N I S I K A M O N 1068. 1'rsiii iilr Analyli. :il Manual, V»l. 1. 2nd. . . i . :•!! .....I "II |• ••vised July I9W». July I!I7«. April l!l71>.

I')7B. Action IrvrK foi |mi<nmnit<t •" -li-lru-iMMts xulMl.in> ••«. t'.S. (•t* » *Uii r

COMF FVAND -!0

•ftPat 11- i)> •

on srvi i .il • •nshrtn»»-ii . '••thcxr l - . ln - i - " •behavioi !• .1"lions, l-iii i' •••grotip* iviil i ji.t

Rt- i-ai - u

I f

nit;'

f •!•

I'll