HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trials; Lessons and Opportunities for ...
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE - University of Pittsburghsuper7/19011-20001/19611.pdf · TOWARDS AN HIV...
-
Upload
phungthuan -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE - University of Pittsburghsuper7/19011-20001/19611.pdf · TOWARDS AN HIV...
1
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINEwhy is it so hard to make an HIV vaccine and where are we now?
Neal Nathanson, MDEmeritus Professor
Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of Pennsylvania
School of Medicine
2
Estimated number of persons living with HIV/AIDS, December, 2004
Global total: 39.4 million
26.8 million
8 million
1 million
3
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE
g Why is it so hard to make an AIDS vaccine?g ‘Sterilizing’ or ‘partial’ immunity?g Immune correlate of protection?g Cellular immunity: provides protection?g Neutralizing antibody: a daunting challengeg Cross-clade immunity?g Current status of AIDS vaccines?
5
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE
RESEARCH EXPERIENCE• HIV env protein fails to induce neutralizing Ab• Live attenuated SIVs protect but cause AIDSBIOLOGICAL ISSUES• First HIV infection may not attenuate a second HIV infection?• Persistence of HIV and progression to AIDSIMPLICATION• Immunobiological questions must be addressed• Mechanisms of vaccine protection?
6
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE
VAXGEN TRIAL OF rgp120multiple immunizations, 3 year cumulative infection percentage
Science 2003, 299: 1290
GROUP TREATMENT SUBJECTS INFECTIONS PERCENT
TOTAL PLACEBO 1679 98 5.8%VACCINE 3330 191 5.7%
WHITE, PLACEBO 1508 81 5.4%HISPANIC VACCINE 3003 179 6.0%
BLACK, PLACEBO 171 17 9.9%ASIAN, OTHER VACCINE 327 12 3.7%
7
0.0-50 150 350 550 750 950 1150 1350
1262
3.9
2.4
1.7
4.1
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
HIV
-1 v
iral R
NA
leve
ls
log1
0 co
pies
/ml
Estimated days since infection
0
101
485
AD
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINEFIRST HIV INFECTION MAY NOT PROTECT AGAINST SECOND INFECTION?
HIV INFECTION IN SEX WORKERS, NAIROBI, KENYACASE # 3
OVERBAUGH ET AL, 2005, UNPUBLISHED
8
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE
VIR
EMIA
(LO
G10
PER
ML)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
HIV TRANSIENT INFECTIONHIV (IMMUNIZED)
4 80 5 10WEEKS YEARS
?
DYNAMICS OF HIV INFECTION ILLUSTRATINGPROBLEMS IN PRE-EXPOSURE IMMUNIZATION
THE DAUNTING TRIAD: FAILURE TO PREVENT INFECTION; PERSISTENCE; LOSS OF CD4 T CELLS
10
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE
“STERILIZING” OR “PARTIAL” IMMUNITY?
For viruses causing acute infections, subjects who have been adequately immunized usually undergo an abortive infection when exposed to a potentially virulent wildtype virus
Will such ‘partial’ protection confer adequate resistance to an HIV challenge or is ‘absolute’ protection (‘sterilizing’ immunity) needed?
Do studies of immunized monkeys challenged with SIV provide auseful reference?
Do studies of viral set points and survival curves in HIV-infected humans provide a useful predictor?
11
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE
PROTECTION OF RHESUS MACAQUES AGAINST SIV SM E660 IV CHALLENGE
BY RECOMBINANT VACCINIA (MVA) IMMUNIZATIONOurmanov, J Virology, 2000, 74: 2740
WEEKS AFTER CHALLENGE
0 4 8 12 16
RN
A C
OPI
ES P
ER M
L PL
ASM
AG
EOM
ETR
IC M
EAN
1
2
3
4
5
6
MVA gag-pol-envPROGRESSORS 1NONPROGRESSORS 5
CONTROLRAPID PROGRESSORS 2PROGRESSORS 3
12
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE
YEARS OF STUDY0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
PER
CEN
T SU
RVI
VIN
G
0102030405060708090
100
0.5-4
4-12
12-2929-250
VIRALSETPOINT
<0.5HIV-2
HIV-1
VIRUS SETPOINT DETERMINES THE COURSE OF THE INFECTIONMellors et al, Science, 1996, 272: 1167; Whittle et al, COI, 1998, 10: 382.
14
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE
CORRELATE HYPOTHESIS?Does protection correlate with a specific immune response parameter, such as antibody, CTL killing, or CD4+ proliferation?
BARRIER HYPOTHESIS?Might a combination of antibody plus CTLs plus associated cytokine responses act in concert to constitute a sufficient barrier?Could different immunizing protocols protect by a different mix of immune defenses?
16
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE
CD8 CELLULAR IMMUNE RESPONSE GOVERNS VIRUS SETPOINT Schmitz et al, Science 1999, 238: 857.
DAYS AFTER IMMUNOSUPPRESSION-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
VIR
AL
RN
A (C
OPI
ES P
ER M
L)
3
4
5
6
7
3
4
5
6
7MONKEY A
MONKEY B
CD8 DEPRESSED
17
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINEVACCINE FAILURE DUE TO ESCAPE FROM A SINGLE CD8 EPITOPE
recombinant env-gag DNA/IL-2 vaccine; SHIV challengeBarouche et al, Nature 2002, 415: 335.
WEEKS AFTER INFECTION0 10 20 30 40 50
LOG
10 m
RN
A P
ER M
L PL
ASM
A
2
3
4
5
6
7
400
800
1200
CD
4 PE
R µ
L
SHIVESCAPE MUTANT(p11C DOMINANT EPITOPE)
19
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINENEUTRALIZING ANTIBODY INFLUENCES VIRUS SETPOINT
chimp anti-HIV passive antibody; challenge: iv virulent SHIV (matched gp120)Shibata et al, Nature Medicine, 1999, 5: 204; Nishimura et al, JV, 2002 76: 2123
DAYS AFTER INFECTION
0 20 40 60 80 100 120SHIV
DN
A (L
OG
10
CO
PIES
PER
105 P
BM
C)
-1
0
1
2
3
CONTROL (4)N AB TITER <2
PARTIAL (4)N AB TITER 2.5-4
COMPLETE (2)N AB TITER 5-8
20
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE
SERUM DILUTION (1/X) PROVIDING 99% NEUTRALIZATION
IN CELL CULTURE
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
PER
CEN
T PR
OTE
CTI
ON
AG
AIN
ST S
HIV
CH
ALL
ENG
E
0
20
40
60
80
100
PASSIVE ANTIBODY PROTECTS MONKEYS AGAINST SUBSEQUENT CHALLENGE WITH VIRULENT SHIV
Nishimura, 2002
21
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE
SIVMHC II
gp120
THE NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODY ENIGMAUsing gp120, it is difficult to raise neutralizing antibodyUsing MHC Class II, anti-SIV neutralizing antibody can be readily induced
INFERENCE?the problem lies with gp120 and not in any intrinsic ability of SIV to resist neutralizationQuery: is SIV gp120 a poor target for neutralization? Do gp120 neutralization escape mutants play a role?
22
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINEHIV INFECTION INDUCES AUTOLOGOUS NEUTRALIZING
ANTIBODY THAT SELECTS FOR ESCAPE VARIANTSRichman et al, PNAS 2003, 100: 4144
PLASMA NEUTRALIZING TITERMONTHS AFTER INFECTON
VIRUSMONTHS
0 6 12 18
0 <100 675 2670 2190
6 <100 <100 1769 2247
12 <100 <100 <100 556
18 <100 <100 117 122
23
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE
THE NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODY ENIGMA
CD4liganddomain
IgG bindingdomain targets near the CD4 binding sitepermitting viral escape mutants
gp120CD4
bindingsite
if CD4 can dock why can’t IgG block attachment?
24
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE
Influenza virus has a receptor site on each trimer head and can be neutralized by antibodies that bind to any of four different sites that are near the receptor binding site. Viral escape mutants can be selected for each of these neutralizing antibody sites
27
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE
ARE THE ~10 CLADES DISTINCT IMMUNOTYPES?
• Will neutralizing antibody cross clades?• Will cellular immunity cross clades?• Relevance of conserved vs variable epitopes?• Are multivalent HIV-1 vaccines needed?
28
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINEMULTICLADE VACCINE IS EQUAL TO MONOCLADE VACCINE
Rhesus monkeys immunized with env DNA @ 0, 4, 8 wks; rAdV env DNA @ 26 wksTested 1 week post vaccine
Letvin et al, 2003
env IMMUNOGENBY CLADE
mg DNA
env RESPONSESBY CLADE
IFN ELISPOT/106 PBLA B C A B C
--
1.5
4.5-
1.5
-4.51.5
120015002500
290012002200
130027002600
30
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINEvaccine provides partial protection in SIV modelrDNA plus rAdv (SIV239 gag, pol, env) immunization
iv SIV 251 (heterologous) challengeLetvin et al, unpublished, 2005
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
20
40
60
80
100Vaccinated
Control
Days Post-SIVmac251 Challenge
% S
urvi
val (n = 24)
(n = 6)
p=0.007P=0.007
p=0.007
31
TOWARDS AN HIV VACCINE
lessons from poliovirus vaccine
“In 1945, Professor Burnet of Melbourne wrote ‘While I was in America recently I had good opportunity to meet with most of themen actively engaged on research in poliomyelitis…The part played by acquired immunity to poliomyelitis is still completely uncertain, and the practical problem of preventing infantile paralysis has not been solved. It is even doubtful whether it ever will be solved.’
…most of us doing research on poliomyelitis in 1945 were mainly motivated by curiosity, rather than by the hope of a practical solution in our lifetime.”
David Bodian, 1976