Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate...
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
percival-richard -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate...
![Page 1: Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate Professor Innovative to abuse? Exploring the interactions.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100509/56649f115503460f94c2442f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning
competition and IP policy
Richard GoldAssociate Professor
Innovative to abuse? Exploring the interactions between intellectual property and competition law October 29, 2008
![Page 2: Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate Professor Innovative to abuse? Exploring the interactions.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100509/56649f115503460f94c2442f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Basic argument• Good governance of innovation depends on
coordination between intellectual property law, competition law and innovation policy
• The current approach is based on an outdated model of innovation
• This leaves substantial gaps between IP and competition policy, leading to overly aggressive use of intellectual property in certain fields
![Page 3: Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate Professor Innovative to abuse? Exploring the interactions.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100509/56649f115503460f94c2442f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Agenda
• Linear vs. complex innovation systems
• The increasing importance of collaboration
• The role of IP law
• The role of Competition law
• The role of public policy
![Page 4: Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate Professor Innovative to abuse? Exploring the interactions.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100509/56649f115503460f94c2442f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The old linear view of innovation
![Page 5: Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate Professor Innovative to abuse? Exploring the interactions.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100509/56649f115503460f94c2442f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Innovation is circular
• Innovation is circular and iterative
• Diffused in space and time
• Innovation depends on networks of public and private sector actors
![Page 6: Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate Professor Innovative to abuse? Exploring the interactions.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100509/56649f115503460f94c2442f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Implications
• A circular innovation system challenges the notion of a single, identifiable market for investigation– A single intellectual asset protected by IP has simultaneous
effects in the innovation market, product market and knowledge markets
• This further complicates assessment of whether market power exists since it may not in the primary market but may in secondary markets
• IP can block innovation directly even in the absence of clear network effects
![Page 7: Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate Professor Innovative to abuse? Exploring the interactions.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100509/56649f115503460f94c2442f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Partnerships and innovation• The innovation environment has changed
significantly over the past 30 years– 30 years ago, 80% of innovation was conducted in a
single firm– Today, 2/3rds of innovation derives from partnerships,
particularly between the public and private sectors– Greater diversity of actors
• Public sector (universities and government labs) much more important players, in some fields, holding over 50% of patents
![Page 8: Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate Professor Innovative to abuse? Exploring the interactions.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100509/56649f115503460f94c2442f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• Traditional innovation models are breaking down in certain sectors (e.g. biomedicine)– These were based on the aggressive use of
IP to keep competitors and users out
• Increasing recognition that aggressive use of IP prevents partnerships and further innovation
Partnerships and innovation
![Page 9: Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate Professor Innovative to abuse? Exploring the interactions.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100509/56649f115503460f94c2442f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Implications
• IP and Competition policy should encourage partnerships and discourage aggressive use of IP to block competitors and users
• Non-exclusive licensing, knowledge sharing, club goods, donations to the public domain, shared investments should be encouraged
![Page 10: Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate Professor Innovative to abuse? Exploring the interactions.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100509/56649f115503460f94c2442f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Implications
• Pooling and other partnership mechanisms should continue to be viewed as pro-competitive
• Reluctance to review per se exercise of exclusive IP rights misplaced– It is exactly here that problems exist– E.g., clinical genetics
![Page 11: Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate Professor Innovative to abuse? Exploring the interactions.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100509/56649f115503460f94c2442f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Role of IP law
• There is little evidence to support the conclusion that IP encourages investment in research
• IP probably has a larger role in bringing an idea to market
• IP offices are trained in the technical area of an invention and are ill-placed to assess the impact of the invention or of the IP right on innovation and access
![Page 12: Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate Professor Innovative to abuse? Exploring the interactions.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100509/56649f115503460f94c2442f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Role of Competition Law
• To ensure that the market operates fairly and transparently
• As the exercise of IP rights affects the flow and use of knowledge, competition law should ensure that market actors do not impose any unnecessary blockages
• Competition offices have expertise in the effects of market action on the movement of assets, including intellectual assets and knowledge
![Page 13: Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate Professor Innovative to abuse? Exploring the interactions.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100509/56649f115503460f94c2442f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Role of Public Policy
• To ensure that the exercise of public rights in IP are used to increase knowledge flows and access
• To encourage private actors to do the same• To create the policy instruments through which
specialised agencies can fulfill their mandates
![Page 14: Toward a new era of intellectual property: aligning competition and IP policy Richard Gold Associate Professor Innovative to abuse? Exploring the interactions.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100509/56649f115503460f94c2442f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Conclusion
• The worlds of IP and competition policy continue to artificially divided
• IP should be more careful about awarding rights but cannot be expected to assess use of IP rights
• Competition should be more careful about monitoring the use of these rights
• Policy makers have given both the patent offices and the competition offices the instruments needed to ensure the flow of knowledge– E.g., section 32 of the Competition Act
• Offices need to exercise these powers