Torts Week 9 - Defamation
description
Transcript of Torts Week 9 - Defamation
![Page 2: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Topics
Week 9– introduction– elements of the cause of action
Weeks 10 & 11– defences– remedies
![Page 3: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Introduction
What interests are protected by defamation law? What are the sources of defamation law?
– position in Queensland• Defamation Act 1889 - commence June 1995
– other Australian jurisdictions
What is defamation?– three elements
• defamatory matter
• reference to the plaintiff• publication
– no defences available to defendant
![Page 4: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Libel and Slander
Common Law– two separate torts
• libel– defamation in permanent form
• slander– defamation in transient form
• radio broadcasts?– Church of Scientology v Anderson
• motion pictures?– Youssoupoff v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
![Page 5: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Why distinguish between libel and slander? Libel
– actionable per se
Slander– generally requires special damage– exceptions
• imputation of crime punishable by imprisonment• disparaging person in office, profession, trade etc• allegation of infectious or contagious disease• imputation of unchastity in women (created by statute)
![Page 6: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Libel and Slander
In Queensland– no distinction
• section 5(1) Defamation Act includes both permanent and transitory forms of communication
– Any person who by spoken words or audible sounds, or by words intended to be read either by sight or touch, or by signs, signals, gestures or visible representations, publishes any defamatory imputation concerning any person is said to defame that person.
– defamation actionable per se
![Page 7: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Elements of Defamation(Queensland and the Common Law)A defamatory matter/statementReference to the plaintiffPublication
![Page 8: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
1. Defamatory Matter
Common Law– matter “of a kind likely to lead ordinary decent folk to
think less of the person about whom it is made”• Boyd v Mirror Newspapers [1980] 2 NSWLR 449 at 452
Queensland– section 4 Defamation Act: Likelihood of
• injury to reputation OR
• injury to plaintiff’s profession or trade OR
• other persons induced to shun or avoid or ridicule or despise the plaintiff
![Page 9: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Standard - objective testCommon Law and Queensland Judged by standard of “hypothetical referee”
– variously described as• reasonable men (women)
• right thinking members of society
• ordinary men(women) not avid for scandal
– knowledge of additional facts and circumstances• Youssoupoff v MGM
not sufficient to show discredit before a restricted class
• Byrne v Deane
• Compare: Krahe v TCN Channel Nine
![Page 10: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Protection of personal and business reputation Common law
– attack on business must be attack on plaintiff’s reputation
• Fairfax v Punch (1980) 31 ALR 624• Boyd v Mirror Newspapers [1980] 2 NSWLR 449
Queensland– section 4 Defamation Act includes:
• likely injury to the plaintiff’s profession or trade
– extends to virtually any legitimate calling• Queensland Newspapers v Baker
![Page 11: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Interpreting Defamatory Matter
Common Law– natural and ordinary meaning– innuendo
• false innuendo
• true innuendo
Queensland– section 4 Defamation Act
• imputation may be expressed either directly or by insinuation or irony
![Page 12: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Role of Judge and Jury
Common law– Judge:
• is the statement capable of bearing the defamatory meaning alleged
– Jury:• did the statement actually have that defamatory meaning
Queensland– section 18 Defamation Act
• same as common law
![Page 13: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Elements of Defamation(Queensland and the Common Law) A defamatory matter/statementReference to the plaintiffPublication
![Page 14: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
2. Reference to the Plaintiff
Common law and Queensland– Material must be reasonably referable to the
plaintiff– Test:
• would a reasonable person having knowledge of the relevant circumstances understand that the material referred to the plaintiff
– Hulton v Jones
– Question of fact for jury
![Page 15: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Who may be defamed?
Common law and Queensland– Any living person
• reputation of living plaintiff may be injured by defamation of deceased person
• action does not survive death of plaintiff or defendant
– Corporations• not unincorporated associations
• not organs of Government
![Page 16: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Identification of the plaintiff
Need not be by name May come from knowledge of extrinsic
facts Intention of the defendant not relevant May be named in other publications
– subsequent publication by defendant– earlier publication by third party
![Page 17: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Defamation of a Group
Class as a whole will never have right of action
Members of class defamed may have action subject to:– size of the class– generality of the charge made
• see eg Bjelke-Petersen v Warburton
![Page 18: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Elements of Defamation(Queensland and the Common Law) A defamatory matter/statement Reference to the plaintiff Publication
![Page 19: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
3. Publication - Common Law
The defamatory matter must be made known to at least one person other than the plaintiff
What constitutes publication?
![Page 20: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Queensland
Section 5(1)– a person who publishes defamatory matter
concerning any person is said to defame that person
Section 5(2)– definition of publication
![Page 21: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Injurious Falsehood
Common law– protects economic interests– actionable only if can prove pecuniary loss– Ratcliffe v Evans:
• requirements of the tort– false statement of and concerning goods
– publication by defendant to third party
– malice on part of defendant
– calculated to cause damage (objective test applied)
– proof of particular loss as a result of the statement
![Page 22: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Queensland
Included in defamation action – section 4 Defamation Act:
• defamatory matter includes any imputation concerning any person…by which the person is likely to be injured in the persons profession or trade
![Page 23: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Benefits of action in defamation over action for injurious falsehood
Plaintiff does not have to prove special damage– Hall-Gibbs Mercantile Agency Ltd v Dunn
(1910) 12 CLR 84
Plaintiff does not have to show that the statement was false
Plaintiff does not have to show defendant motivated by malice
![Page 24: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Summary
Defamation in Qld A defamatory matter/statement Reference to the plaintiff Publication
Defamation at common law plus injurious Falsehood
![Page 25: Torts Week 9 - Defamation](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070418/568157ef550346895dc565ea/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Thank you!Thank you!