Topology Optimization of Racecar Suspension Uprightsluxonengineering.com/pdf/altair_htc_2011.pdf ·...

15
Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Topology Optimization of Racecar Suspension Uprights Billy Wight Luxon Engineering Altair HyperWorks Technology Conference June 23, 2011 Orlando, Florida

Transcript of Topology Optimization of Racecar Suspension Uprightsluxonengineering.com/pdf/altair_htc_2011.pdf ·...

  • Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.

    Topology Optimization of Racecar Suspension Uprights

    Billy Wight

    Luxon Engineering

    Altair HyperWorks Technology Conference

    June 23, 2011

    Orlando, Florida

  • Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.

    6/23/2011

    Slide 2

    Company Profile

    y = 639.26xR² = 0.9955

    y = 6.2275x + 461.61R² = 0.9901

    y = 278.39x - 1278.4R² = 0.9997

    y = 6.9865x3 - 255.27x2 + 3119.1x - 11266R² = 0.9994

    y = 4.6277x + 220.62R² = 0.496

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1000

    1100

    1200

    1300

    1400

    1500

    0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00

    Tru

    e St

    ress

    (M

    Pa)

    True Strain (%)

    NiTiNOL, Af = 19 CAustenite Phase E

    Pseudoelastic Austenite toMartensiteMartensite Phase E

    Plastic Deformation

    Pseudoelastic Martensite toAusteniteLinear (Austenite Phase E)

    • San Diego Based Engineering Consulting Firm • Product Development

    • Mechanical Design and Analysis

    • Finite Element Analysis/Optimization

    • CAD Modeling and Manufacturing Drawings

    • Located in San Diego, California

    • Small Company, 3 Engineers on Staff

    • In Business Since January, 2007

    • Wide Variety of Industries Served • Industrial Equipment

    • Medical Device

    • Consumer Products

    • Automotive

  • Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.

    6/23/2011

    Slide 3

    Application Profile

    F1000 (Formula B) Class

    • Open Wheel

    • Stock 1000cc Motorcycle Engine

    • 1000 lbs Minimum Weight

    • 155 mph Max Speed

    • ~ 1200 lbs Downforce @ 155 mph

    • 2.4 g’s Lateral Acceleration

    • Base Price $39,900 (Roller, No Engine)

    D Sports Racer (DSR) Class

    • Closed Wheel

    • Modified 1000cc Motorcycle Engine

    • 900 lbs Minimum Weight

    • 165 mph Max Speed

    • ~ 2000 lbs Downforce @ 165 mph

    • 2.8 g’s Lateral Acceleration

    • Base Price $59,900 (Roller, No Engine)

  • Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.

    6/23/2011

    Slide 4

    Previous Application Project

    Modified Salisbury Differential • Collaborative Effort Between Luxon Engineering and Williams Racing Developments (WRD)

    • Chain Drive from 1000cc Motorcycle Engine

    • Direct Replacement for Stohr Cars

    • Fits Other Manufacturers

    • Speeds, Phoenix, Radical, etc.

    • Substantial Weight Savings and Performance Benefits vs. Stock

  • Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.

    6/23/2011

    Slide 5

    Design Challenge: Suspension Uprights

    • Simple, Inexpensive

    • Multi-Piece (Bolt-on Brackets)

    • Designed to “Get the Job Done” at an Inexpensive Price Point

    • Necessary to Maintain a Reasonable Price for the Base Car

    (front) (rear)

    Stock Stohr Uprights (Current Design)

  • Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.

    6/23/2011

    Slide 6

    Design Goals and Constraints

    Performance Goals:

    • Light Weight - Minimize Unsprung Mass

    • High Stiffness - Minimize Compliance

    • Suspension Compliance =

    • One Piece Design – Remove Failure Modes

    Design Constraints:

    • 6061-T6 Material

    • Readily Available

    • Low Cost

    • Good Strength to Weight Ratio

    • 3-Axis CNC Manufacturing

    • Readily Available

    • Reasonably Priced

    • Keep Stresses Low, ≤ 160 MPa for Main Loadcases

    ? What is the most

    efficient method of

    achieving our goals

    subject to the design

    constraints?

    ( , )f Springs Dampers

  • Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.

    6/23/2011

    Slide 7

    Altair Analysis Solutions

    16 Different Loadcases

    • 5 Main Loadcases

    • Typical Racing Environment

    • 11 Additional Loadcases

    • Bump Loading, Off Track Loading, etc.

    • Derived from:

    • Vehicle Datalog Measurements

    • Suspension Kinematics

    • Tyre Data

    • Aerodynamic Data

    Meet Design Goals Satisfying Constraints

    • Minimize Design Iterations

    • Decrease CAD Modeling Time

    • Decrease Analysis Setup Time

    • Engineering Time = $$$

    • Decrease Product Development Time

    • Introduce Product to Market ASAP

    TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION

    • Supports Multiple Loadcases • One Analysis Run Reveals Optimum Load-Paths

    • Stress Constraint • Manufacturing Constraints

  • Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.

    6/23/2011

    Slide 8

    Loadcase Development

    • Accurate and Complete Loadcases are of Vital Importance

    • Optimization Algorithm Can Only Optimize to the Inputs it is Given

    • Vehicle Data Logging

    • Allows for Accurate Loadcase Determinations

    • Verification of Calculations and Assumptions

    • Extensive/Thorough Calculations

    • Account for All Possible Load Conditions

    • Thermal Effects, etc.

    0 0 3512 0 0 3512

    -2051 0 2578 -3537 0 4446

    3537 0 4446 2051 0 2578

    0 -3853 4342 0 -3853 4342

    0 0 3226 0 0 3226

    Bump Acceleration Direction (-X) (+X) (-Y) (+Z) Bump Acceleration Direction (-X) (+X) (-Y) (+Z)

    Steady State Bump -269 269 -1612 7249 Steady State Bump -269 269 -1612 7249

    Bump During Left Corner -2248 -1854 -1183 2578 Bump During Left Corner -3877 -3197 -2041 11919

    Bump During Right Corner 3197 3877 -2041 11919 Bump During Right Corner 1854 2248 -1183 2578

    Bump During Braking -332 332 -5846 11398 Bump During Braking -332 332 -5846 11398

    Bump During Acceleration -247 247 -1481 5818 Bump During Acceleration -247 247 -1481 5818

    0 0 4120 0 0 4120

    -2163 0 2719 -4392 0 5521

    4392 0 5521 2163 0 2719

    0 -2920 3290 0 -2920 3290

    0 2335 4406 0 2335 4406

    Bump Acceleration Direction (-X) (+X) (-Y) (+Z) Bump Acceleration Direction (-X) (+X) (-Y) (+Z)

    Steady State Bump -315 315 -1891 9725 Steady State Bump -315 315 -1891 9725

    Bump During Left Corner -2371 -1955 -1248 2719 Bump During Left Corner -4815 -3970 -2534 16731

    Bump During Right Corner 3970 4815 -2534 16731 Bump During Right Corner 1955 2371 -1248 2719

    Bump During Braking -252 252 -4430 5576 Bump During Braking -252 252 -4430 5576

    Bump During Acceleration -337 337 313 11155 Bump During Acceleration -337 337 313 11155

    Tyre Contact Patch Forces: 2010 Stohr WF1

    Right Front Tyre Contact Patch Forces (Newtons)Left Front Tyre Contact Patch Forces (Newtons)

    Steady State

    Left Corner

    Steady State

    Left Corner

    Right Corner

    Braking

    Right Rear Tyre Contact Patch Forces (Newtons)

    Right Corner

    Braking

    Accelerating

    Braking

    Accelerating

    Right Corner

    Braking

    Right Corner

    Left Rear Tyre Contact Patch Forces (Newtons)

    Left Corner

    Steady State

    Accelerating Accelerating

    Steady State

    Left Corner

  • Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.

    6/23/2011

    Slide 9

    Topology Optimization: Parameters, Front

    3- Axis CNC Manufacturing

    Split (Both Sides) Draw Direction Constraint

    • Ensures No Undercutting in the Result

    Multiple Loadcases

    Stress Constraint, 100 MPa

    • Weights Each Loadcase Equally

    • Maintains Target Stress Levels

    Minimize Unsprung Weight

    Optimization Goal: Minimize Mass

  • Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.

    6/23/2011

    Slide 10

    Topology Optimization: Solution Sequence, Front

    TET4 Design

    Space (Yellow)

    “Material that

    CAN be there”

    Topology Result

    “Material that

    NEEDS to be there”

    CAD

    Interpretation

    Final Design

    TET10 Analysis

    Model Iterate

  • Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.

    6/23/2011

    Slide 11

    Topology Optimization: Parameters, Rear

    3- Axis CNC Manufacturing

    Split (Both Sides) Draw Direction Constraint

    • Ensures No Undercutting in the Result

    Decrease Cost

    Symmetry Constraint

    • Ensures Symmetry in the Result

    • Rear Uprights are the Same Part Left/Right

    Multiple Loadcases

    Stress Constraint, 100 MPa

    • Weights Each Loadcase Equally

    • Maintains Target Stress Levels

    Minimize Unsprung Weight

    Optimization Goal: Minimize Mass

  • Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.

    6/23/2011

    Slide 12

    Topology Optimization: Solution Sequence, Rear

    TET4 Design

    Space (Yellow)

    “Material that

    CAN be there”

    Topology Result

    “Material that

    NEEDS to be there”

    CAD

    Interpretation

    Final Design TET10 Analysis

    Model

    Iterate

  • Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.

    6/23/2011

    Slide 13

    Performance Results

    Mass – Decrease of 40%

    • ~ 1.5 lbs per wheel

    Stiffness – Increase of 225%

    • Measured via Deformation of a Node at the Tyre Contact Patch

    Stress – Goals Achieved

    • Stress < 160 MPa (Main Loadcases)

    • Stress < 220 MPa (All Loadcases)

  • Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.

    6/23/2011

    Slide 14

    Conclusions

    Engineering Time = $$$

    • Optimization Eliminates the Multiple

    Iterations of Traditional FEA • Typical Problems Would Have Taken

    15+ Iterations

    • The Optimized Design is Often Non-

    Intuitive • Unlikely that Traditional Techniques

    Would Yield the Same Result

    Altair Optistruct Substantially Reduces

    Engineering Overhead and Development Time

  • Copyright © 2011 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.

    6/23/2011

    Slide 15

    Questions, Comments?

    Billy Wight

    President

    Luxon Engineering (858) [email protected] www.luxonengineering.com

    J.R. Osborne, 2008 SCCA DSR and CSR National Champion