Tools and models for assessing wood · 4/6/2017 · Forest Quality more valuable trees Wood fibre...
Transcript of Tools and models for assessing wood · 4/6/2017 · Forest Quality more valuable trees Wood fibre...
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Tools and models for assessing wood quality in Australian radiata pine
Geoff DownesForest Quality Pty. Ltd.
Dave DrewForest Forecasting
Validation and development of eCambium software tool
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Forest Quality Pty Ltd• Applied R&D based in southern Tasmania
• 20 years working for CSIRO in Forestry and Forest Products• CRC Hardwood Fibre and Paper Science (1992 –1999)• SilviScan Services (2000‐2003)• Ensis Joint Venture with Scion (NZ) (2003‐2008)• CRC Forestry Ltd (2005 – 2012)
• Spin‐off company from the CRC Forestry Ltd. (Est. July 2012)
• Focus on wood property assessment and modelling1. NIR assessment of Eucalypt pulp properties2. In‐field assessment of wood properties and training
• Increment coring | IML Resistograph |Portable NIR3. Process‐based modelling of wood properties
• FWPA funded eCambium projects in radiata pine (2010 ‐2016)
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
y = 93.61x + 55.20R² = 0.57
$300
$325
$350
$375
$400
$425
$450
2.9 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9
Site average
lumbe
r value ($.m
‐3)
Site‐average log Acoustic wave velocity (km.sec‐1)
Wealth generation
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
eCambium’s prediction of site value
• eCambium predictions made 4 months before logs were harvested
y = 0.41x + 239.37R² = 0.62
$225
$250
$275
$300
$325
$350
$375
$400
$425
$225 $250 $275 $300 $325 $350 $375 $400 $425
Actua
l calculated value $/m
3
eCambium predicted $/m3
VicNSW
Bago cpt 66 high elevation
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
eCambium’s prediction of log MOE
• eCambium predictions made 4 months before logs were harvested
y = 1.01xR² = 0.50
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Mean log MOE (GPa
)
eCambium predicted BH MOE (GPa)
Vic
NSW
Bg066
Me111
Hv013a
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees Wood fibre transverse properties, excluding tangential variance
Radiata pineLength : 108.7 mm File : radiataArea : 371 cm
2 Weighting : area
tangential diameter m%cv = 18
32.24.9
611183
28.52.3
540107
3.440.98
23349
meansdev
10 20 30 40 50
10 20 30 40 50
200 400 600 800 1000
200 400 600 800
2 4 6
radial diameter m
conditioned density kg m -3
coarseness g m-1
wall thickness m
specific surface m 2kg-1
50403020100
50403020100
1000800600400200
0
6420
800600400200
0
500400300200100
0100 200 300 400 5000 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360
CSIRO Forest Products 08-Jun-1995cumulative area cm 2
Typical SS‐1 Analysis Report (circa 1995)
Cost: ~$200 per radial core
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
SilviScan mapping of wood stiffness variation within trees
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Overview of eCambium (Version 2.1)
• eCambium predictions of wood variation link effects of growth on board volume and quality
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
eCambium’s main user interface
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Defining site
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Defining regime
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Defining weather
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Building a “scenario”
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Overview of eCambium (Version 2.1)
• eCambium predictions of wood variation link effects of growth on board volume and quality
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Drilling down into the lower level values
• Daily predictions of
• Wood density• MFA• Fibre diameter• Fibre wall
thickness
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Tree growth predictions
Predictions of• Height• DBH• Stand Volume• Soil water
availability• Predawn water
potential
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Tree growth predictions
Predictions of• Height• DBH• Stand Volume• Soil water
availability• Predawn water
potentialStem
Diameter (cm)
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Murray Valley Basin Validation
Project Objectives•Regional assessment of wood property variation from P.radiata sites in the Murray Valley Basin
•close to harvest•represent wide range of resource variability
•Obtain a representative data set describing site average andvariance data of tree and wood properties as a basis forevaluating the performance of the eCambium modelling tool
•Produce a “commercially‐ready” version of eCambium
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Site SelectionBuccluegh
Greenhills
BagoCarabost
Maragle
Shelley
Ovens Valley
Benalla
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Stage 1: NDE Resource Evaluation
• 53 sites• 30 trees per site
• DBH• Outerwood density cores • Standing tree acoustic velocity (ST300)
• 6 trees per site• Tree height• Branch diameter• Bark thickness
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
eCambium prediction of outerwood density
50% of the variation in site mean OWD was predicted by eCambium
ST300
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Fitted Empirical models of outerwood density
OWD = 396.6–1.93(Branch Diameter) + 0.174(Spring Rainfall) + 2.43(Age)
• 38% variance explained
UT_OWD = 392–2.36(Branch Diameter) + 0.63(Autumn Rainfall) + 4.64(Max. Autumn T)+2.45(Age)
• 55% variance explainedT1_OWD = 1187–2.26(Branch Diameter) – 0.476(DBHOB) – 0.066(Annual
Rainfall) – 21.55(Ave Temp) – 0.07(Annual Radiation) + 10.1(Age)
• 71% variance explained
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Problem of 50mm outerwood cores
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
a. CB001 250‐100
Mean wood density (kg/m³)
5 yr50 mm
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
b. CB001 1000‐1000
Mean wood density (kg/m³)
50 mm5 yr
50 mm
5 yr
50 mm5 yr
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Comparison with actual Silviscan data allowed
eCambium to be evaluated at the annual
ring level to assess whether the model was predicting radial trends
accurately.
Radial trends
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
IML Resistograph
• < 30 secs per tree• Provides radial variation• No Laboratory work• Easy –to‐use
y = 0.15x + 17.06R² = 0.88
300
350
400
450
500
550
2000 2500 3000 3500 4000Ou
terW
ood D
ensity (kg/m
3)Outerwood Resi (resistance units)
a.
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Entry sideExit side
Exit resistance
70% of exit resistance explained by diameter (~50%) and density (~20%)
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Properties obtained• Overbark diameter• Underbark diameter• Bark thickness• Average underbark density• Outerwood averages• Radial average
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
ARCstudy:UniversityofTasmania(ProfBradPotts)
y = 0.07x + 230.00R² = 0.64
y = 0.07x + 217.23R² = 0.64
y = 0.07x + 238.03R² = 0.66
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
Actual Core De
nsity
Underbark average RESI value
Both Sites
Salmon River
Togari
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Manjimup,WAResi Validation
R² = 0.77
400
500
600
700
800
3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Core basic den
sity (kg/m3)
RESI value (resistance units)
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Sawmill study sites value predictions2:HV013a
value = $ 344 m^3
10268
utilityF5MGP10MGP12MGP15
Board Count =DBHUB =
0.0000
0.0625
0.1250
0.1875
0.2500
8:ME111value = $ 320 m^3
15330
11:MH001value = $ 250 m^3
13316
18:LV015value = $ 344 m^3
16334
19:LV018bvalue = $ 310 m^3
10274
Board Count =DBHUB =
0.0000
0.0625
0.1250
0.1875
0.2500
20:LV018avalue = $ 334 m^3
13314
37:BI104T1value = $ 375 m^3
13312
40:MA044UTvalue = $ 316 m^3
12286
42:BG587T1value = $ 325 m^3
13308
Board Count =DBHUB =
0.0000
0.0625
0.1250
0.1875
0.2500
44:BG066UTvalue = $ 328 m^3
12280
47:GH845T2value = $ 331 m^3
13324
52:CB011T1value = $ 360 m^3
12280
Boar
d Vo
lum
e (m
^3)
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Log Preparation
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Barcode application to log ends
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Logs weighed for green density calculation
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Logs loaded into mill infeed
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Resultant boards imaged
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
eCambium’s prediction of site value
• eCambium predictions made 4 months before logs were harvested
• Partly dependent on grade thresholds for converting MOE into grade
y = 0.41x + 239.37R² = 0.62
$225
$250
$275
$300
$325
$350
$375
$400
$425
$225 $250 $275 $300 $325 $350 $375 $400 $425
Actua
l calculated value $/m
3
eCambium predicted $/m3
VicNSW
Bago cpt 66 high elevation
More fertile site than used in model, possibly ex‐pasture.
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
Conclusions• eCambium explained similar OWD variance to empirical models
• eCambium predictions in range using general inputs for site descriptions• publically available database values• FR constant at 0.3, • rock content constant at zero
• Parameter optimization, across Tasmania, Green Triangle, Victoria and NSW yielded calibration r2 > 60%
• eCambium explained 50‐60% of the site average sawlog value and log MOE• Low‐cost way to get broad‐scale insights into estate‐level wood variation and value
• Model setup and operation relatively simple• Ready for commercial application• Development for operational functionality needed (industry input required)
Forest Qualitymore valuable trees
e‐Cambium:optionsforthefuture