Template for Deign and Estimation of Water Supply System with Surface Water Source Input Dat Assumptions

I PopulationYear Population Households

1951 54,981 I Population Projections1961 67,026 1971 87,981 If the above option is "Available Projected Data" enter projected population below 1981 137,927 Year1991 191,000 Population2001 261,740 52,000

II Present Water supply If the above option is "Growth Rate based Project" enter below the Decadal Growth Rate to be used for Projection Year Population Quantity Tube Wells NRW Decade

Nos MLD Nos % Decade2009 486,000 81.05 195 40 Growth Rate%

No of water connections 27,303 NosPopulation Covered 137,429 Nos II Design PeriodYearly Revenue Assesment Year 07-08 184 Lac Rs Base Year

Yearly Revenue Received Year 07-08 110 Lac RsYearly O & M Expenditure Year 07-08 535 Lac RsNo of Employees 283 Nos III Market RatesRoad Length 600 KM Over Head Service Reservoir: per litreDistribution laid 285 KM Clear Water Reservoir: per litre Pumping Hours 23 Hours NRW reduction and Replace Service Lines: per connectionClear Water Reservoirs: At present: nos 4 Nos Electric Connection on CWPS, RWPS & WTPClear Water Reservoirs: Present Capacity 7 ML Water Meter supply, installation & Maintenance 5 yearsDistribution Reservoirs: at present: nos 7 Nos CWPS with civil, mechanical & electrical complete, per KW Distribution Reservoirs: present Capacity 3 ML Average Cost of rising main CWPS to OHSRsRequired capacity of OHSRs (20 to 35%) 30 % Distribution extension n improvement, per capita of 2021 poRequired capacity of CWRs, Detention time 2 Hours Water Treatment Plant, Rate per MLDAvg. OHSR capacity 1.75 ML Intake Arrangements, LSNo of Distribution Zones 38 Nos IV Additional Information for Surface SourceProposed staging of OHSRs 20 Meter length of pipe Intake to WTP, m

Lowest water level in Intake, mproposed water Colomn in OHSRs 6 Meter Level of Inlet pipe in WTP/FSL in Inlet chamber, mFriction losses in specials, appurtenances 10 % Design Period of pumping main, yearsNo of Working Pumps for RWPS 4 Nos Efficiency of Pump set RWPS, %No of Working Pumps for CWPS 2 Nos Efficiency of Pump set CWPS, %Stand bye pumps 50 % Length of R Main CWPS to OHSRs, per OHSR, mEnergy Charges per Kilo Watt 5 Rs Assumed losses in Rising Main & specials, meter/kilometerIntrest Rate 10 % Minimum sump level below Ground level, meter

rough ness coefficient for modified Hazen William 1 Cr Ground level at CWPS, metersProposed reduction in existing source,per 5 yea 25 % GL at OHSR site (maximum level ), meters

iii

Design Period for Storage/rising main

Template for Deign and Estimation of Water Supply System with Surface Water Source City Panipat Assumptions User Instructions

Method/Basis Available Projected Data Choose from drop down menu only to WTP with sump and RWPS, from WTP water collected in CWR and then by

CWPS pumped directly to different service reservoirs , WTP near the city. Single If the above option is "Available Projected Data" enter projected population below stage pumping for raw water and for clear wate. Surface ground generally flat.

2011 2021 2031 2041 499,438 701,302 959,740 1,274,752 colours. Input data or review the data/result according to following color codes:

If the above option is "Growth Rate based Project" enter below the Decadal Growth Rate to be used for Projection Input data to be providedDecadal Growth Rate

2001-11 2011-21 2021-31 2031-41 Review the provided values &revise/update if required

No data to be entered select from drop down menuYear 2011

No. of Years: Choose from drop down 30 2041

Market Rates Rs DI K7 Dia in mm Rs/meterOver Head Service Reservoir: per litre 8 100 918 standard methods. If decadal growth is assigned for future Clear Water Reservoir: per litre 3 150 1,395 then it should be given in decadal growth NRW reduction and Replace Service Lines: per connection 6,000 200 1,540 Electric Connection on CWPS, RWPS & WTP 21,600,000 250 2,005 than 1000000 else 160 LPCD as per Manual. Initial losses has been taken as Water Meter supply, installation & Maintenance 5 years 2,000 300 2,543 given in Input data and it remain same for next 5 years and then decrease by CWPS with civil, mechanical & electrical complete, per KW 25,000 350 3,197 10% every decade till minimum of 15 %, Fire demand taken as per manual Average Cost of rising main CWPS to OHSRs 8,000 400 3,833 The existing supply taken from input data and in future existing supply reducedDistribution extension n improvement, per capita of 2021 po 370 450 4,547 as per % reduction stared in input data, requirement -existing source=demandWater Treatment Plant, Rate per MLD 2,500,000 500 5,325 Intake Arrangements, LS 5,000,000 600 7,015 taken from water demand sheet, Storage norms taken from input sheetAdditional Information for Surface Source 700 9,622 length of pipe Intake to WTP, m 50 800 12,550 economical size of rising mainLowest water level in Intake, m 233.5 900 15,314 Level of Inlet pipe in WTP/FSL in Inlet chamber, m 240.1 1000 18,354 Design Period of pumping main, years 30 No of distribution zones and OHSRs found for year 15/30 years DPEfficiency of Pump set RWPS, % 78 MeterEfficiency of Pump set CWPS, % 83 MeterLength of R Main CWPS to OHSRs, per OHSR, m 1400 Meter and quantities and sizes worked out in different sheetsAssumed losses in Rising Main & specials, meter/kilometer 1 YearsMinimum sump level below Ground level, meter 4 % in phase 1 and in phase 2 calculated in Demand sheetGround level at CWPS, meters 235 %GL at OHSR site (maximum level ), meters 236 m

1 Where Applicable:This is for augmentation by new surface water source, water pumped from intake

2Input Data:The cells for data input and requiring users review are shaded with different

3 Output: 6 output tables are given which is final output and shall be part of report4 Population Projection: This tool gives population projection by different

5 Demand Projection: Water demand has been taken 135 LPCD if population less

6 Capacity of CWRs required:

7 Rising main Design: template for rising Main design used to find

8 Raw Water Pumping Station: 9 Over Head Service Reservoir:

10 Clear Water Pumping Station:11 Estimate: Estimate has been worked out as per unit rates in input sheet

12 WTP Capacity & Land required:

User Instructions

to WTP with sump and RWPS, from WTP water collected in CWR and then by CWPS pumped directly to different service reservoirs , WTP near the city. Single stage pumping for raw water and for clear wate. Surface ground generally flat.

colours. Input data or review the data/result according to following color codes:

Input data to be provided Enter data if condition satisfies

Review the provided values & No value to be enteredrevise/update if required Calculates automatically

No data to be entered select from drop down menu

standard methods. If decadal growth is assigned for future then it should be given in decadal growth

than 1000000 else 160 LPCD as per Manual. Initial losses has been taken as given in Input data and it remain same for next 5 years and then decrease by 10% every decade till minimum of 15 %, Fire demand taken as per manual The existing supply taken from input data and in future existing supply reducedas per % reduction stared in input data, requirement -existing source=demand

taken from water demand sheet, Storage norms taken from input sheet

economical size of rising main

No of distribution zones and OHSRs found for year 15/30 years DP

and quantities and sizes worked out in different sheets

in phase 1 and in phase 2 calculated in Demand sheet

Where Applicable:This is for augmentation by new surface water source, water pumped from intake

Input Data:The cells for data input and requiring users review are shaded with

6 output tables are given which is final output and shall be part of report Population Projection: This tool gives population projection by different

5 Demand Projection: Water demand has been taken 135 LPCD if population

6 Capacity of CWRs required: Requirement for year 15 and 30 years

7 Rising main Design: template for rising Main design used to find

8 Raw Water Pumping Station: Head, discharge and Kilowatt calculated9 Over Head Service Reservoir: Total Capacity worked out for 15/30 year DP

10 Clear Water Pumping Station: Head, discharge and Kilowatt calculated11 Estimate: Estimate has been worked out as per unit rates in input sheet

12 WTP Capacity & Land required: WTP capacity and raw water requirement

Table 1: Projected Population & Water DemandYear Population Gross Water Demand Likely Deficit

MLD MLD2011 499,438 96.63 15.58 2016 591,825 114.29 53.50 2021 701,302 125.73 80.14 2026 820,407 135.77 101.58 2031 959,740 152.10 126.45 2036 1,106,088 194.13 174.89 2041 1,274,752 223.47 209.04

Notes:Gross Water Demand: Net water demand + lossesDeficit: Based on current supply levels and likely reduction in supply in future

Table 2: Source & Treatement CapacityParticulars UnitRaw Water Raw Water Requirement (Ultimate Design Year) MLD WTP Capacity & Land Requirement Ultimate Capacity Required (Ultimate Design Year) MLD

Land requirement for WTP ( including for CWR and RWPS/CWPS) ha WTP Development Stages Stage-1 development (in base year for intermediate design period MLD Stage-2 development (in intermediate year for ultimate design period) MLD Notes:

Table 3: Raw Water & Clear Water Pumping RequirementsParticulars UnitRaw Water Pumping Station

No of working pumps No,s No of Standby pumps No,s Pumping Hours hours Discharge per pump, with respect to pumping hours LPS Total Pumping Head m Pump kilowatt KW Total No of Pumps No,s Total Kilowatt KW

Clear Water Pumping StationNo of working pumps no,s No of Standby pumps no,s Pumping Hours hours Discharge per pump, with respect to pumping hours LPS Total Pumping Head m Pump kilowatt KWTotal No of Pumps no,sTotal Kilowatt KW

Notes:

Table 4: Raw Water & Clear Water Rising MainsParticulars UnitRaw Water Pumping Main (From Source to WTP)Length m Diameter mm

Recommended Type of PipeClear Water Pumping Main (From WTP to Zonal OHSRs)Total Number of Zones No,s Total Number of Zonal OHSRs (one per each Zone) No,s Total length of Pipeline (for all zones) m DiameterRecommended Type of PipeNotes:

Table 5: Storage RequirementParticulars UnitClear Water Reservoir (CWR) at WTP Ultimate Capacity Required (Ultimate Design Year) ML Available CWR Capacity ML Total Capacity to be Developed ML CWR Development Stages Stage-1 development (in base year for intermediate design period ML Stage-2 development (in intermediate year for ultimate design period) ML

Over Head Service Reservoirs (OHSRs)Total Storage Requirement of OHSRs ML Available OHSR Capacity ML Total OHSR Capacity to be Development ML Total Number of Zones No,s Recommeded Average Capacity of OHSR ML OHSR Development Stages Stage-1 development (in base year for intermediate design period Storage Capacity to be Developed ML Zones to be Developed No,s Total number of zonal OHSRs required No,s Stage-2 development (in intermediate year for ultimate design period) Storage Capacity to be Developed ML Zones to be Developed No,s Total number of zonal OHSRs required No,s

Quantity/Value

220.00

210.00 13.00

102.00 108.00

Quantity/Value

4.00 2.00 23.00 296.00 7.00 30.00 6.00 180.00

2.00 1.00 23.00 616.00 83.70 680.00 3.00 2,040.00

Quantity/Value

50.00 600.00

DI K7

38 38 53,200

DI K7

Quantity/Value

16.29 6.75 9.54

4.56 4.98

67.04 2.65 64.39 38 1.75

38.08 23 23

26.31 15 15

Table 1: Population Projection

Year Population Households HH Size

1951 54,981 1961 67,026 21.91% 2.00%1971 87,981 31.26% 2.76%1981 137,927 56.77% 4.60%1991 191,000 38.48% 3.31%2001 261,740 37.04% 3.20% 52,000 52011 499,438 90.81% 6.67% 99,224 52016 591,825 40.42% 3.45% 117,578 52021 701,302 40.42% 3.45% 139,328 52026 820,407 36.85% 3.19% 162,991 52031 959,740 36.85% 3.19% 190,672 52036 1,106,088 32.82% 2.88% 219,747 52041 1,274,752 32.82% 2.88% 253,256 5

Population Projections

- - - - 1.00 -

Decadal Growth Rate

Annual Growth Rate

Arithmetic Growth Method (AM)

Incremental Increase (IM)

Geometric Growth Method (GM)

Average of AM_IM_GM

Available Projected Data

Growth Rate based Projection

Input Growth Rate

Table 2: Water Demand

Year Population LPCD Losses Demand Losses Fire Demand Total Present Deficit% MLD MLD MLD MLD MLD MLD

2011 499,438 135 40 67.42 26.97 2.23 96.63 81.05 15.58 2016 591,825 135 40 79.90 31.96 2.43 114.29 60.79 53.50 2021 701,302 135 30 94.68 28.40 2.65 125.73 45.59 80.14 2026 820,407 135 20 110.75 22.15 2.86 135.77 34.19 101.58 2031 959,740 135 15 129.56 19.43 3.10 152.10 25.64 126.45 2036 1,106,088 150 15 165.91 24.89 3.33 194.13 19.23 174.89 2041 1,274,752 150 15 191.21 28.68 3.57 223.47 14.43 209.04

Table 3: WTP Capacity Requirement Parameter Units QuantityConsidering 5% treatment losses, requirement for 15 yr DP MLD 106.66 Ultimate WTP Capacity Required (30 years design period) MLD 210.00 Land requirement for WTP ( including for CWR and RWPS/CWPS) ha 13.00 Proposed development of WTP - 2 stage (Intermediate - 15 year and ultimate - 30 years)WTP Capacity (Stage-1 development in base year for intermediate design period) MLD 102.00 WTP Capacity (Stage-2 development in intermediate year for ultimate design period) MLD 108.00 Raw Water Requirement (Ultimate Demand + 5% WTP losses) MLD 220.00

@ 625 m2 per MLD

Table 2: Clear Water Reservoirs

year DemandMLD ML ML ML

2026 135.77 11.31 6.75 4.562041 223.47 16.29 6.75 9.54

Capacity Reqd

Available Capacity

Proposed Capacity

Table 3: Raw Water Pumping StationDescription Unit QuantityMinimum water level in Intake 233.50 Outlet level 240.10 Static head 6.60 Friction Losses in pipe line 0.0102878 Losses in specials,entry,exit,piping 0.0010288 Total Pumping Head m 6.6113166 Rounding upwards m 7.00 Quantity of water to be pumped MLD 102.00 No of working pumps No,s 4 No of Standby pumps No,s 2 Rounding upwards No,s 2 Pumping Hours hours 23

MLD 24.44 As above LPS 295.14 Pump Efficiency % 78.00 Pump kilowatt KW 25.97 Motor Rating coefficient 1.15 Motor Rating 29.86 Round up 30.00 Total No of Pumps No,s 6 Total Kilowatt KW 180

Discharge per pump, with respect to pumping hours

Table 4: Over Head Service Reservoirsyear Demand

MLD ML ML ML2026 135.77 40.73 2.65 38.08 2041 223.47 67.04 2.65 64.39

Recommeded Average Capacity of OHSR 1.75 MLNumber of Zones Required (Intermediate Year) 23 No,sNumber of Zones Required (Ultimate Year) 38 No,sNumber of OHSR per zone 1 No,sTotal number of zonal OHSRs (intermediate year) 23 No,sTotal number of zonal OHSRs (Ultimate Year) 38 No,s

OHSRs Capacity

Present Capacuty

New OHSRs

Table 7: EstimateS No Item Quantity Rate Units

1 Construction of Intake arrangements 1 5,000,000 No2 Construction of Raw Water Pump House 180 25,000 KiloWatt3 Construction of Water Treatment Plant 210 2,500,000 MLD4 Construction of CWRs 9,544,329 3 Litre5 Construction of OHSRs 64,389,526 8 Litre6 Clear Water Pumping Station 2,040 25,000 KW7 R Main RWPS to WTP DI Pipe K7, Dia in mm

600 50 10,523 meter8 R Main CWPS to Zonal Service Reservoirs 53,200 8,000 meter9 Distribution system 1,274,752 370 Nos

10 Domestic Meters 30,034 2,000 Nos11 Reduction of NRW & Replace Service Line 30,034 6,000 Nos12 Electric Connection on CWPS, RWPS,WTP 1 21,600,000 Nos13 Cost of Land for WTP, CWPS, RWPS, SRs 1 10,000,000

Sub TotalPhysical Contingency 10%Other contingencies 5%Grand Total

AmountRs 5,000,000 4,500,000 525,000,000 28,632,988 515,116,209 51,000,000

526,125 425,600,000 471,658,240 60,068,000 180,204,000 21,600,000 10,000,000 2,298,905,561 229,890,556 114,945,278 2,643,741,396

CALCULATION OF LEAST-COST PIPE SIZEPUMPING TRANSMISSION MAIN Intake to WTP

ECONOMACAL SIZE OF RAW WATER RISING MAIN MAIN

From : Intake ===== =======================

To : WTP

1) Water requirement : Year Peak Discharge

A. Initial 2011 15.58

B. Intermediate 2026 107.10

C. Ultimate 2041 220.00

2) Pumping main LENGTH 50

3) Static head for pump ST.HEAD 6.60

4) Design period YEAR 30

5) Combined eff. of pump set EFF. % 78

6) Cost of pumping unit Rs./KW 25000

7) Interest rate INTEREST 10.00

8) Life of electric motor & pump set P.Yrs 15

9) Energy charges per kWh P/KWH 4.75

10) Pumping hours for discharge PUMPING- 23

at the end of 30 years HOURS

11Energy Charges capitalised:Cc n 15

cr((1-(1+r)^(-n))/n) Rate of intrest 0.10

cc 7.606

C 4.177

CALCULATIONS: 1st 15 years

1) Discharge at Start OF PERIOD 15.58

2) Discharge at the end of 15 yrs 107.10

3) Average Discharge 61.34

4) Ave.pumping hours during the period 13.17

5) KW required at combined 16.257897

efficiency of pumping set

6) Ave.annual charges for electrical

energy Rs. 371557

Modified Hazen William's FormulaV=

h=

12 Present value of investment reqd after 15 years=C/((1+r)^n)

143.534CR r0.6575 S0.5525

[L(Q/CR)1.81 ]/[994.62D4.81]

Friction Head Loss (First 15 years)

Dia. in mm L Q CR Q/CR (Q/CR)^1.81 994.62

100 50 0.1071 1 0.1071 0.0175355318380138 994.62

150 50 0.1071 1 0.1071 0.0175355318380138 994.62

200 50 0.1071 1 0.1071 0.0175355318380138 994.62

250 50 0.1071 1 0.1071 0.0175355318380138 994.62

300 50 0.1071 1 0.1071 0.0175355318380138 994.62

350 50 0.1071 1 0.1071 0.0175355318380138 994.62

400 50 0.1071 1 0.1071 0.0175355318380138 994.62

450 50 0.1071 1 0.1071 0.0175355318380138 994.62

500 50 0.1071 1 0.1071 0.0175355318380138 994.62

600 50 0.1071 1 0.1071 0.0175355318380138 994.62

700 50 0.1071 1 0.1071 0.0175355318380138 994.62

800 50 0.1071 1 0.1071 0.0175355318380138 994.62

900 50 0.1071 1 0.1071 0.0175355318380138 994.62

1000 50 0.1071 1 0.1071 0.0175355318380138 994.62

Velocity

Dia. in mm 143.534 CR r=A/P=D/4 r0.6575 S S^0.5525

100 143.534 1 0.025 0.08843935 1.1383132 1.07419869214241

150 143.534 1 0.0375 0.11545841 0.1619059 0.365693883123431

200 143.534 1 0.05 0.13949954 0.0405796 0.170251081755875

250 143.534 1 0.0625 0.1615441 0.0138730 0.0940912195752269

300 143.534 1 0.075 0.18211796 0.0057718 0.0579592766670549

350 143.534 1 0.0875 0.2015442 0.0027498 0.0384777961713158

400 143.534 1 0.1 0.22003917 0.0014466 0.026983304905386

450 143.534 1 0.1125 0.23775671 0.0008209 0.019731315167707

500 143.534 1 0.125 0.25481109 0.0004946 0.0149126339787874

600 143.534 1 0.15 0.28726321 0.0002058 0.00918603757622704

700 143.534 1 0.175 0.31790512 0.0000980 0.00609839359297981

800 143.534 1 0.2 0.34707811 0.0000516 0.00427661742943319

900 143.534 1 0.225 0.37502482 0.0000293 0.00312724058997724

1000 143.534 1 0.25 0.4019255 0.0000176 0.00236352183752369

Friction Head Loss (Second 15 years)

Dia. in mm L Q CR Q/CR (Q/CR)^1.81 994.62

100 50 0.22 1 0.22 0.064533475096952 994.62

150 50 0.22 1 0.22 0.064533475096952 994.62

200 50 0.22 1 0.22 0.064533475096952 994.62

250 50 0.22 1 0.22 0.064533475096952 994.62

300 50 0.22 1 0.22 0.064533475096952 994.62

350 50 0.22 1 0.22 0.064533475096952 994.62

400 50 0.22 1 0.22 0.064533475096952 994.62

450 50 0.22 1 0.22 0.064533475096952 994.62

500 50 0.22 1 0.22 0.064533475096952 994.62

600 50 0.22 1 0.22 0.064533475096952 994.62

700 50 0.22 1 0.22 0.064533475096952 994.62

800 50 0.22 1 0.22 0.064533475096952 994.62

900 50 0.22 1 0.22 0.064533475096952 994.62

1000 50 0.22 1 0.22 0.064533475096952 994.62

Velocity

Dia. in mm 143.534 CR r=A/P=D/4 r^0.6575 S S^0.5525

100 143.534 1 0.025 0.08843935 4.1891688 2.206610321

150 143.534 1 0.0375 0.11545841 0.5958390 0.751205436

200 143.534 1 0.05 0.13949954 0.1493391 0.349728404

250 143.534 1 0.0625 0.1615441 0.0510548 0.193281427087262

300 143.534 1 0.075 0.18211796 0.0212410 0.119059480339686

350 143.534 1 0.0875 0.2015442 0.0101195 0.079040779668274

400 143.534 1 0.1 0.22003917 0.0053238 0.0554288880852903

450 143.534 1 0.1125 0.23775671 0.0030212 0.0405319090467719

500 143.534 1 0.125 0.25481109 0.0018200 0.030633412873829

600 143.534 1 0.15 0.28726321 0.0007572 0.0188698845654865

700 143.534 1 0.175 0.31790512 0.0003607 0.0125272711089536

800 143.534 1 0.2 0.34707811 0.0001898 0.008784993

900 143.534 1 0.225 0.37502482 0.0001077 0.00642395248785949

1000 143.534 1 0.25 0.4019255 0.0000649 0.004855128

========= ========= =========== ============ ========= ================== =======================

TABLE 1 - VELOCITY AND HEADLOSSES FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES

----------------- ----------------- ------------------- --------------------- ----------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------------

Sl. Pipe Frictional Head Velocity in

No. Size loss per m/s ------

in 1000 m 1st stage flow

mm ---------------- -------------- -------

1st 2nd 1st 2nd Frict-

stage stage stage stage ional

flow flow flow flow loss

----------------- ----------------- ------------------- --------------------- ----------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------------

1 100 1138.31 4189.17 13.64 28.01 56.91565769

2 150 161.91 595.84 6.06 12.45 8.09529730

3 200 40.58 149.34 3.41 7.00 2.02897866

4 250 13.87 51.05 2.18 4.48 0.69364988

5 300 5.77 21.24 1.52 3.11 0.28858817

6 350 2.75 10.12 1.11 2.29 0.13748790

7 400 1.45 5.32 0.85 1.75 0.07233079

8 450 0.82 3.02 0.67 1.38 0.04104682

9 500 0.49 1.82 0.55 1.12 0.02472783

10 600 0.21 0.76 0.38 0.78 0.01028784

11 700 0.10 0.36 0.28 0.57 0.00490129

12 800 0.05 0.19 0.21 0.44 0.00257851

13 900 0.03 0.11 0.17 0.35 0.00146327

14 1000 0.02 0.06 0.14 0.28 0.00088152

----------------- >>> * Other losses = 10% of frictional loss

========= ========= =========== ============ ========= ================== =======================

TABLE 2 - KILOWATTS & COST OF PUMP SETS REQUIRED FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES AND PIPE COST

----------------- ----------------- ------------------- --------------------- ----------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------------

1st stage flow of

61.34 million liters/day

-------- --------- ---------

Sl. PIPE Class H1 Kw Pump

No. Size of Total req'd Cost @ Rs

in PIPE head

plus 50%

25000.00

mm in per kw

meters standby Rs THS

----------------- ----------------- ------------------- --------------------- ----------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------------

1 100 K7 69.21 1688 42194

2 150 K7 15.50 378 9453

3 200 K7 8.83 215 5385

4 250 K7 7.36 180 4489

5 300 K7 6.92 169 4217

6 350 K7 6.75 165 4116

7 400 K7 6.68 163 4072

8 450 K7 6.65 162 4051

9 500 K7 6.63 162 4040

10 600 K7 6.61 161 4031

11 700 K7 6.61 161 4027

12 800 K7 6.60 161 4026

13 900 K7 6.60 161 4025

14 1000 K7 6.60 161 4024

TABLE 3 - COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF OVERALL COST OF PUMPING MAIN FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES

----------------- ----------------- ------------------- --------------------- ----------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------------

1st stage flow 61.34 mld 2nd stage flow

------ --------- --------- --------- ------ ---------

Cost Annual Capital- Capital- Cost Annual

of Energy ised ised of Energy

Sl. pump Charges Energy Total pump Charges

No. sets Charges Cost sets

THS THS THS THS THS THS

1 42194 25714 195586 237780 296814 234797

2 9453 5761 43818 53271 49307 39005

3 5385 3282 24960 30344 18552 14676

4 4489 2736 20809 25298 11782 9320

5 4217 2570 19549 23767 9729 7696

6 4116 2508 19080 23196 8963 7090

7 4072 2482 18877 22949 8632 6829

8 4051 2469 18780 22831 8474 6703

9 4040 2462 18729 22769 8391 6638

10 4031 2456 18684 22715 8318 6580

11 4027 2454 18667 22695 8290 6558

12 4026 2453 18660 22686 8279 6549

13 4025 2453 18657 22682 8273 6544

14 4024 2453 18655 22679 8270 6542

Minimum capitalised cost

Economical Dia

frictional Losses in pipe line, economical dia,15year DP

Total length of pipe

Type of Pipe

I N P U T D A T A

========== =============== ============== ========= ========= =========

P I P E D A T A

mld DIAMETER MATERIAL CLASS Cr RATE Rs/m

mld 100 DI K7 1 918

mld 150 DI K7 1 1395

200 DI K7 1 1540

M 250 DI K7 1 2005

M 300 DI K7 1 2543

yr. 350 DI K7 1 3197

% 400 DI K7 1 3833

Rs 450 DI K7 1 4547

% 500 DI K7 1 5325

yr. 600 DI K7 1 7015

Rs 700 DI K7 1 9622

hrs 800 DI K7 1 12550

900 DI K7 1 15314

yearsyears 1000 DI K7 1 18354

*Cr

*Po

PRESS <ALT>M for MENU

2nd 15 years

mld 107.10 mld

mld 220.00 mld

mld 163.55 mld

hrs 17.10 hrs

* H1 33.40 * H2

*H1 990688 * H2

D D^4.81 h( First 15 yrs)

0.1 0.000015488 56.915658

0.15 0.000108893 8.0952972956968

0.2 0.000434464 2.0289786610405

0.25 0.001270842 0.693649882384

0.3 0.003054592 0.2885882

0.35 0.006411613 0.1374878958181

0.4 0.012187330 0.0723308

0.45 0.021475940 0.0410468247776

0.5 0.035648866 0.0247278317919

0.6 0.085685535 0.0102878410187

0.7 0.179854609 0.0049012875913

0.8 0.341871453 0.002578510601

0.9 0.602429833 0.0014633

1 1.000000000 0.0008815

V

13.63593627

6.060354689

3.408924996

2.181699826

1.515062418

1.11310

0.852216481

0.673354249

0.545415505

0.378759041

0.278270876

0.213050428

0.168335645

0.136351513

D D^4.81 h( Second 15 yrs)

0.1 0.000015488 209.45844197105

0.15 0.000108893 29.79194878491

0.2 0.000434464 7.4669559557159

0.25 0.00127084165571 2.5527390799628

0.3 0.00305459217724 1.0620492

0.35 0.00641161288973 0.5059767666512

0.4 0.012187330 0.2661885

0.45 0.021475940 0.1510586772652

0.5 0.03564886612089 0.0910022537032

0.6 0.08568553532341 0.0378608495205

0.7 0.17985460934393 0.0180374980146

0.8 0.34187145271812 0.0094893186698

0.9 0.60242983290131 0.0053851

1 1 0.0032441

V

28.01083071

12.4491319

7.00258633

4.48163025

3.112229043

2.286526812

1.750616246

1.383198887

1.120388147

0.778043778

0.571621797

0.437646478

0.34579373

0.280092183

========== =============== ============== ========= =========

------------------- -------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------- -----------------

Total head(m) for 50.00 m length

including 6.60 m static head

--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------

2nd stage flow

--------- -------- ------- --------- ---------

Total Frict- Total

Other* Head ional Other* Head

losses H1 loss losses H2

------------------- -------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------- -----------------

5.69 69.21 209.45844 20.95 237.00

0.81 15.50 29.79195 2.98 39.37

0.20 8.83 7.46696 0.75 14.81

0.07 7.36 2.55274 0.26 9.41

0.03 6.92 1.06205 0.11 7.77

0.01 6.75 0.50598 0.05 7.16

0.01 6.68 0.26619 0.03 6.89

0.00 6.65 0.15106 0.02 6.77

0.00 6.63 0.09100 0.01 6.70

0.00 6.61 0.03786 0.00 6.64

0.00 6.61 0.01804 0.00 6.62

0.00 6.60 0.00949 0.00 6.61

0.00 6.60 0.00539 0.00 6.61

0.00 6.60 0.00324 0.00 6.60

>>> * Other losses = 10% of frictional loss

========== =============== ============== ========= =========

------------------- -------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------- -----------------

2nd stage flow of Cost Cost

163.55 MLD of of

-------- --------- --------- pipe 50

H2 Kw Pump per meter

Total req'd Cost @ Rs unit pipe

head plus % 25000.00 length line

in 50 per kw THS

meters standby Rs THS ( Rs ) ( Rs )

------------------- -------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------- -----------------

237.00 11873 296814 918 46

39.37 1972 49307 1395 70

14.81 742 18552 1540 77

9.41 471 11782 2005 100

7.77 389 9729 2543 127

7.16 359 8963 3197 160

6.89 345 8632 3833 160

6.77 339 8474 4547 227

6.70 336 8391 5325 266

6.64 333 8318 7015 351

6.62 332 8290 9622 481

6.61 331 8279 12550 628

6.61 331 8273 15314 766

6.60 331 8270 18354 918

TABLE 3 - COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF OVERALL COST OF PUMPING MAIN FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES

------------------- -------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------- -----------------

163.55 mld

--------- --------- GRAND

TOTAL

of

Capital- Capital- Initial PIPE Capital-

ised ised Capital SIZE ised

Energy Total Investment in cost

Charges Cost for pumpsets (mm) for

& annual ele

ct. Charges 30 yrs

THS THS THS THS Dia

1785888 2082702 498582 100 736408 100

296672 345978 82824 150 136165 150

111625 130177 31163 200 61584 200

70892 82674 19791 250 45189 250

58536 68264 16342 300 40236 300

53927 62889 15055 350 38411 350

51939 60571 14500 400 37610 400

50985 59458 14234 450 37292 450

50487 58878 14095 500 37131 500

50047 58364 13972 600 37038 600

49882 58173 13926 700 37102 700

49811 58090 13906 800 37220 800

49777 58050 13897 900 37344 900

49760 58030 13892 1000 37489 1000

37038 thousand Rs

600 mm

0.01029 m

50 m

DI K7

Table 8: Clear Water Pumping StationParameter Units QuantityStaging Height of Service Reservoir m 20 Water Colomn in Service Reservoir m 6 No of Distribution zones No 38 Length of Rising Main m 53,200 Friction Losses in pipes and specials m 53 Suction Head m 4 difference in level in CWPS and OHSR m 1 Total Pumping Head m 84 Rounding m 84 No of stand working pumps 2 Total quantity of water to be pumped MLD 102 Pumping Hours hours 23 Pump Discharge LPS 616 Rounding LPS 616 Pump Kilo Watt 611 Multiplying Coefficient for KW 1 Motor Kilo Watt 672 Rounding , upward multiple of 10 KW 680 Stand bye pumps no,s 1 Total No of Pumps no,s 3 Total kilo Watt installed KW 2,040