Tom Maes, ERGEG Gas Working Group 19th Madrid Forum 21 March 2011 Transit contracts.

Tom Maes, ERGEG Gas Working Group19th Madrid Forum21 March 2011

Transit contracts

219th Madrid Forum, 21-22 March 2011

Agenda

• Background• Enquiry of the TSOs

• Set-up• Results

• Response of the Commission• Way forward


Background

• Gas transit is crucial• Depleting indigenous sources calls for additional and

diversified imports;• Fragmented and monopolistic markets need to be

interconnected;• Bidirectional flows increase security of supply.

• 18th Madrid Forum invited ERGEG to provide• an overview per Member State of the transit contracts

which are still in force;• a proposal as to how these contracts will be brought

in line with the provisions.


Enquiry – Set-up

• Letter sent to 32 ENTSOG members

• As not to exclude any type of contract

• Intentionally open definition

• Two general questions

• Two reminders, one with copy to NRA

• Response of 29 TSOs


Enquiry – Results / Legal Analysis

• Directive 2003/55/EC allowed a limited number of contracts to persist under the terms

of Directive 91/296

• As from 1 July 2006 (Regulation 1775/2005) access based on non-discriminatory,

transparent and cost reflective tariffs is fully applicable to the so-called (historical)

transit contracts

• Regulation 715/2009

• From 3 March 2011 tariffs shall be set separately for every entry and exit point;

• By 3 September 2011, network charges shall not be calculated on the basis of contract paths.


Enquiry – Results / TSO responses

• Collected data is not complete and potentially ambiguous

• Only few TSOs acknowledge holding transit contracts

• Even less assume possible conflicts with European law

• No legal obligation to provide this information to ERGEG

• Not all NRAs have access to this kind of data

Num

ber

Coun

try

code

Com

pany

logo

Com

pany

nam

e

Answ

er re

ceiv

ed?

Hold

s tra

nsit

cont

ract

s?

Mor

e sp

ecifi

cally

, hol

ds tr

ansit

co

ntra

cts w

ithin

the

scop

e of

the

Tran

sit D

irecti

ve 9

1/29

6/EE

C?

Whe

n w

ill th

ese

cont

ract

s be

br

ough

t in

line

with

EU

law

?

- At e

xpira

tion

of co

ntra

cts

- By

3 M

arch

201

1

- Aft

er tr

ansp

ositi

on o

f 3rd

Pac

kage

Mak

es n

o di

stinc

tion

betw

een

dom

estic

tran

spor

t and

"tra

nsit"

?

Ope

rate

s an

entr

y-ex

it sy

stem

for a

ll tr

ansm

issio

n ca

paciti

es?

Appl

ies r

egul

ated

tariff

?

Have

neg

otiati

ons w

ith

coun

terp

artie

s sta

rted

yet

?

1 ATBOGBaumgarten-Oberkappel Gasleitungsgesellschaft m.b.H

Y N N

2 AT OMV Gas GmbH Y N N N

3 ATTAG GmbH(Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH)

Y N N N

4 BE Fluxys Y Y Y


Enquiry – Results / Suggestions

• Commission takes every opportunity to

• Address this issue;

• Pursue existing or open new infringement procedures;

• Cooperate with NRAs both in preliminary and litigation procedures.

• Commission further analyses this issue under the auspices of ACER.


Response of the Commission

• Shared view that elimination of transit contracts not compliant with EU law is

needed for achieving internal market;

• Follow-up needed on this issue;

• Additional assessment by ERGEG is necessary pinpointing for which

countries/TSOs it continues to have doubts.


Way forward

• Assistance of respective NRAs is needed for sound evidence

• Double scope

• Does the same regulated tariff / methodology apply for all transmission activities without exception for

border-to-border transmission?

• Does the same capacity allocation methodology apply at cross-border interconnection points irrespective

of the origin or destination of the gas? Is this organised in a fully decoupled entry-exit model?


Thank you for your attention!

www.energy-regulators.eu

Tom Maes, ERGEG Gas Working Group 19th Madrid Forum 21 March 2011 Transit contracts.

Documents

Transcript of Tom Maes, ERGEG Gas Working Group 19th Madrid Forum 21 March 2011 Transit contracts.