To Walk or Not to Walk

57
o Walk, or Not to Walk … 09 CNU oject for Transportation Reform (PTR) Summit rtland, Oregon hard A. Hall, P.E. HPE Hall Planning & Engineering, Inc.

description

Rick Hall analyzes the economic, health and environmental implications of creating pedestrian friendly, walkable neighborhoods. While recognizing the importance of walkability to the overall effort of healthy urban development, Mr. Hall highlights the "top ten" factors contributing to walkability. Topping this list is small block size. Mr. Hall's presentation reminds us of the importance of contextual connectivity, pedestrian accessibility as well as urban density and their contribution sustainable city design.

Transcript of To Walk or Not to Walk

Page 1: To Walk or Not to Walk

To Walk, or Not to Walk …2009 CNU Project for Transportation Reform (PTR) Summit Portland, Oregon

Richard A. Hall, P.E.

HPEHall Planning & Engineering, Inc.

Page 2: To Walk or Not to Walk

To walk, or not to walk: that is the question:Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer

Edwin Booth, Hamlet 1870Wikipedia

Page 3: To Walk or Not to Walk

the signs and arrows of outrageous proportion,

Page 4: To Walk or Not to Walk

Or to take arms against a sea of trucks,And by opposing slow them?

Page 5: To Walk or Not to Walk

To walk: To speed no more;

Page 6: To Walk or Not to Walk

and by a stroll to say we end

D. Burdin

Page 7: To Walk or Not to Walk

the heart-ache of a thousand annual deathsthat flesh is heir to;

Page 8: To Walk or Not to Walk

To walk, to stroll the street: perchance to dream ...

D. Burdin

Page 9: To Walk or Not to Walk

life before 30

Page 10: To Walk or Not to Walk

life after 30

Page 11: To Walk or Not to Walk

• economy• development projects must sell• Read Greyfields into Goldfields, CNU Lee Sobel• TND property values, 40 to 200% premium

• health• CDC, obesity epidemic• astounding highway fatality rate – 45k/year• safe walk to school

• environment – climate• it’s a crisis!• IPCC UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change• urban design influences VMT, thus a valid solution• what we can’t see can hurt us! 1 pound per mile, out window.

• etc.

Why Walk?

Page 12: To Walk or Not to Walk

CO2 Emissionsper Passengermile

Page 13: To Walk or Not to Walk

Drake’s Well – 150 years ago Titusville, Pennsylvania Edwin L. Drake & George Bissell struck oil, at 69 feet August 27/1859

Page 14: To Walk or Not to Walk

• drivable suburban– FAR = 0.2 – 0.4– vehicle mobility only by LOS - America’s default– extensive parking lots & wide roads– requires estimated 2/3 more energy than walkable urbanism

• walkable urban– FAR = 0.8 – 40.0– total mobility;

–walking, biking, transit, & vehicle use– urban form leads transportation design– often illegal today

from Option of Urbanism by Chris Leinberger:

tale of two cities

Page 15: To Walk or Not to Walk

Andrew Georgiadisdrivable suburban

Page 16: To Walk or Not to Walk

walkable urban Andrew Georgiadis

Page 17: To Walk or Not to Walk

It is not without hazard that change comes

Page 18: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 19: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 20: To Walk or Not to Walk

Top 10 Walkability Factors

• 10. Street Trees• 9. Lower Volumes• 8. Sidewalks• 7. Narrow Streets • 6. Interconnected

Streets

• 5. On Street Parking• 4. Lower Traffic Speeds• 3. Mixed Land Use• 2. Buildings Fronting

St. • 1. Small Block Size!

Page 21: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 22: To Walk or Not to Walk

Gaines Corridor Workshop

Page 23: To Walk or Not to Walk

Urban Transportation Design Question of the Century

• Q. Can you see DOT treating Gaines Street any differently than Capital Circle by the interstate?

• A. No.

Page 24: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 25: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 26: To Walk or Not to Walk

“The first step in the (thoroughfare) design process is to define the function that the facility is to serve.” AASHTO

Page 27: To Walk or Not to Walk

functional classification • Arterials - Connecting major areas, long trips for

mobility• Collectors - Connecting arterials, intermediate trips• Locals - Serving local access & connecting to

collectors, short trips

• All trips are by auto or truck, no pedestrians in the critical functional definition

• Areas = rural or urbanized, only two major areas• Add a third major area type – Compact Urban

Page 28: To Walk or Not to Walk

larger problem

arterial roadway designs differ only for rural & urbanized areas.

Again, too little regard for walking & compact urban context

Page 29: To Walk or Not to Walk

rural urbanized

Update the functional classification system areas

Page 30: To Walk or Not to Walk

rural

suburban

compact urban

Update the functional classification system areas

Page 31: To Walk or Not to Walk

rural

suburban

compact urban

new compact urban

Update the functional classification system areas

Page 32: To Walk or Not to Walk

• simulate urbanized travel from past travel patterns• apply expensive travel models of capacity• size network per vehicle LOS to prevent “failure”

• simulate urban form based on measured places • prioritize character and function over capacity• network is sized to yield smaller blocks

suburban

compact urban

what is the difference?

Page 33: To Walk or Not to Walk

land access

vehicle mobility

arterial

collector

local

land access

mobility for all modes

proportion of service by functional classificationgeneral urban compact urban

Page 34: To Walk or Not to Walk

vehicles all modes

trip length by functional classification

arterial

collector

local

general urban compact urban

Page 35: To Walk or Not to Walk

• continue valiant efforts to adjust suburban thoroughfares

• apply complete streets planning & design

• walking is first• set low speeds as 20 & 25• develop ped. scale design parameters • encourage multimodal travel via networks• decrease travel modeling and traffic impact analysis• reward good design behavior with higher funding levels

suburban

compact urban

what is the effect?

Page 36: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 37: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 38: To Walk or Not to Walk

The Transect – A Classification System

Page 39: To Walk or Not to Walk

18 mph

18 mph

Page 40: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 41: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 42: To Walk or Not to Walk

Roslyn, NYRoslyn, NY

Page 43: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 44: To Walk or Not to Walk

Roslyn, NYRoslyn, NY

Page 45: To Walk or Not to Walk

Congestion or Mobility

Page 46: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 47: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 48: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 49: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 50: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 51: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 52: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 53: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 54: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 55: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 56: To Walk or Not to Walk

'tis a transformation devoutly to be wish'd.

D. Burdin

Page 57: To Walk or Not to Walk

To walk: To speed no more;