To Study The Issues And Challenges Of Export Market With ...€¦ · ECGC Export Credit and...
Transcript of To Study The Issues And Challenges Of Export Market With ...€¦ · ECGC Export Credit and...
To Study The Issues And Challenges Of Export Market
With Special Reference To Vashi
Agricultural Produce Market Committee Market,
Navi Mumbai
Thesis Submitted to D. Y. Patil University,
School of Business Management
In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the Degree of
MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY
In BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
Submitted by
DEVANG K. NANDOLA
(Enrolment No. DYP-MPhil-1560900002)
Research Guide
Prof. Dr. R. GOPAL
DIRECTOR & HEAD OF DEPARTMENT
D.Y. PATIL UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
Sector 4, Plot No. 10,
CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai – 400 614
February 2017
To Study The Issues And Challenges Of Export Market
With Special Reference To Vashi
Agricultural Produce Market Committee Market,
Navi Mumbai
i
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the thesis entitled “To Study The Issues And
Challenges Of Export Market With Special Reference To Vashi
Agricultural Produce Market Committee Market, Navi Mumbai” submitted
for the Award of Master of Philosophy in Business Management at D.Y. Patil
University, School of Business Management is my original work and the thesis
has not formed the basis for the award previously of any degree, associate
ship, fellowship or any other similar titles.
The material borrowed from other sources and incorporated in the thesis has
been duly acknowledged.
I understand that myself could be held responsible and accountable for
plagiarism, if any, detected later on.
The research papers published based on the conducted out of and in the
course of the study are based on study and not borrowed from other sources.
Place: Navi Mumbai
Date:
Signature of Signature of Signature of
Guide Head of Dept. Student
ii
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the thesis entitled “To Study The Issues And
Challenges Of Export Market With Special Reference To Vashi
Agricultural Produce Market Committee Market, Navi Mumbai” and
submitted by Mr. Devang K. Nandola is a bonafide research work for the
award of the Master of Philosophy in Business Management at D. Y. Patil
University, School of Business Management in partial fulfilment of the
requirements for the award of the Degree of Master of Philosophy in Business
Management and that the thesis has not formed the basis for the award
previously of any degree, diploma, associate ship, fellowship or any other
similar title of any University or Institution.
Also, it is certified that the thesis represents an independent work on the part
of the candidate.
Place: Navi Mumbai
Date:
Signature of Signature of
Head of the Department Guide
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I am greatly indebted to D. Y. Patil University, School of Business
Management which has accepted me for the Master Program and provided
me with an excellent opportunity to carry-out the present research work.
I am grateful to my guide, mentor, philosopher Prof. Dr. R. Gopal for having
guided me throughout the research span of time and for providing his
constructive criticism which made me bring out the best in me. I would also
like to thank Sir for being approachable at any point of time without
considering his own precious personal time.
I express my sincere gratitude to the Sachivalay, Vashi APMC Market Traders
and specially my colleagues and ex-colleagues, my family and friends for their
whole-hearted support.
I would like to convey my thanks to everyone who has been influential and
supportive in this research work.
Place: Navi Mumbai
Date: Signature of the Student
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER
NO.
PARTICULARS PAGE
NO.
Declaration i
Certificate ii
Acknowledgement iii
Table of Contents iv
List of Tables v - vi
List of Figures vii
List of Abbreviations viii - xi
Executive Summary xii - xiii
1. Introduction To Vashi APMC Market 1 – 22
2. Literature Review & Research Gap 23 – 27
3. Objectives, Scope and Research Methodology 28 – 32
4. Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market
Committee: an overview
33 - 50
5. Maharashtra State Agricultural Marketing
Board: an overview
51 - 82
6. History of APMC Market Mumbai 83 – 92
7. Contribution of APMC to India’s Export
Growth
93 - 102
8. Data Interpretations and Major Findings of the
Research
103 – 117
9. Recommendations and Conclusion
118
10. Annexure
119 - 123
v
LIST OF TABLES
Table
No.
Table Description Page
No.
1. Marketing Details of Arrivals During the year 2013-
2014 to 2015-16 (in M.T.)
17
2. Recovery of Market Fees for the last 5 years 17
3. Supervision Charges paid to the State Government
during last 5 years
18
4. Total land of APMC 18
5. Number of Market Functionaries (For the period of
31st March, 2016)
19
6. Income and Expenditure of APMC for last 5 years
(31st March, 2016)
19
7. Shifting of Wholesale Trade to APMC Complex
VASHI
34
8. Market-Wise Galas & Office Blocks 35
9. ANNUAL DETAILS OF ARRIVALS (Lakh Metric Ton) 35
10. Details of arrival and prices during the year 2013-14
to 2015-16
36
11. Comparative Statement of Market-wise income of
Market fee (Rs. In Lacs)
36
12. Comparative Statement of Income (Rs. In Lacs) 39
13. Comparative Statement of Expenditure (Rs. In Lacs) 41
14. Division wise break-up of APMCs are as follows 53
15. Classification of APMCs (2015-2016) 53
16. Budget of APMC 54
17. Loan to APMC 54
vi
18. Contribution of APMC 56
19. Export Promotion of goods 57
20. Export Facility Centres of APMC 63 - 69
21. List of GLOBALGA certification agencies in India 73
22. KESAR MANGO – GLOBALGAP Certificates
received under Primary Marketing Organization
(PMO) – 10
74
23. Agriculture Export Zones in Maharashtra and
implementing agencies
76
24. Farming Area of Land (MSAMB) 82
25. General Information on Vashi APMC Market, Navi
Mumbai
89
26. Administration of Vashi APMC Market, Navi Mumbai 90
27. Rail/Road Connectivity of Vashi APMC Market, Navi
Mumbai
90
28. Market Area of Vashi APMC Market, Navi Mumbai 90
29. Arrivals / Dispatches of Vashi APMC Market, Navi
Mumbai
91
30. Market Functionaries of Vashi APMC Market, Navi
Mumbai
92
31. Transactional Methods of Vashi APMC Market, Navi
Mumbai
92
32. Storage Area of Vashi APMC Market, Navi Mumbai 92
33. Facilities and Services of Vashi APMC Market, Navi
Mumbai
92
34. Market Charges of Vashi APMC Market, Navi Mumbai 92
35. Financial Position of Vashi APMC Market, Navi
Mumbai
92
vii
LIST OF FIGUERS
Sr.
No.
Figure Description Page
No.
1. Comparative Statement of Market-wise income of
Market fee
(Rs. In Lacs):
37
2. Statement of supervision cost recovered and paid by
MAPMC to state Government of Maharashtra. (Rs. In
Lacs)
38
3. Statement of supervision cost recovered and paid by
MAPMC to state Government of Maharashtra. (Rs. In
Lacs)
40
4. Expenditure 2015-16 41
5. National Agriculture Market, Targets and Reality 42
6. Agricultural Markets in India 42
7. Shortcomings in current APMC system at a glance 44
8. Current model of distribution network for APMC –
Vashi
47
9. Proposed model of distribution network for APMC -
Vashi
47
10. Comparison of APMC Karnataka model to that of our
suggested model at APMC Vashi
49
11. Detail supply chain of tomatoes of 20 farmers under
consideration
50
12. Requirements for proposed supply chain 50
13. Data Interpretations and Major Findings of the
Research
103 –
117
viii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Abbreviation
Full Form
AEZ AGRI EXPORT ZONE
APEDA Agriculture and Processed Food Export Development
Authority
APMC Agricultural Produce Market Committee
A W B Air Waybill
BRC Bank Realization Certificate
CA Controlled Atmosphere
CAH/D.D. Cash/ Demand Draft
CHAs Customs House Agents
CIDCO City and Industrial Development Corporation
CSR Corporate Social Responsibility
DCA Debt Collection Agency
ECGC Export Credit and Guarantee Corporation
EU European Union
EUREP Euro-Retailer Produce Working Group
ix
F O B Free on Board
FICCI The Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and
Industry
GAP Good Agricultural Practices
GMO Genetically Modified Organisms
GMP Good Manufacturing Practices
GOI Government of India
GST Goods & Services Tax
GR WT Gross Weight
HACCP Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points
HIV / AIDS Human Immuno Deficiency Virus/ Acquired Immune
Deficiency Syndrome
ICS
International Certification Services
IEC Import - Export Code
IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development
IMO
In My Opinion
ITPO Indian Trade Promotion Organisation
JDGFT Joint Director General of Foreign Trade
x
L/C Letter of Credit
MA Modified Atmosphere
MCCI&A Mahratta Chamber of Commerce, Industries and
Agriculture
MMRDA Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority
MNCs Multi-National Corporate
MSAMB Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committee
MSEB Maharashtra State Electricity Board
MT Metric Ton
NAM National Agricultural Market
NCDEX National Commodity & Derivatives Exchange Limited
NORAD North American Aerospace Defence Command
NT WT Net Weight
OBC Other Backward Classes
REMS Rashtriya e- Market Services Limited
R.C.C Renal Cell Carcinoma
RTGS
Real Time Gross Settlement
xi
SHGs Self-help groups
SC Schedule caste
SGS
SociétéGénérale de Surveillance
SME/MSME Micro, Small Medium Enterprises
SPS Sanitary and phyto-sanitary
SPSS Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
ST Scheduled Tribes
TBT Technical Barriers to Trade
TUV Tuvalu
UAE United Arab Emirates
USA United States of America
VHT Vapour Heat treatment
WTO World Trade Organization
xii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
APMC market is widely divided into 2 business, large scale and small-scale
business. Many of the people are aware about small-scale business but few
of them are aware about the issues and challenges faced by SME & MSME
business while exporting their goods. The present case study is focuses on to
Study the issues and challenges of export market with special reference to
Vashi agricultural produce market committee market, Navi Mumbai. This
study is based on some parameters such as age, gender, nature of business,
and their level of income. APMC has manifold role to play as a catalyst in
promoting exports. It not only constructs a platform for the exporters to
redress their problems and suggestions to the concerned authority but also
helps to penetrate new markets for Indian products. Representations of
APMC are well received by the Diplomats, Governments in India and abroad.
Having a wide global network, APMC provide reciprocal trade promotion
activities for the benefits of Indian exporters.
The purpose of the study is to understand the role and activities of
Department of Commerce, Government of India &to study and understand the
role of APMC Market and activities to be performed by it.
The scope of the Study includes twenty-five export traders. Exploratory and
Qualitative Research has been carried out to understand the services
provided by the APMC. To Study the effectiveness and efficiency of the
APMC, an index has been developed based on the ranking obtained under
the various parameters. Feedback has been obtained through Questionnaire.
Based on the feedback, the index of effectiveness has been worked out.
The main objectives of the study are to understand the various issues &
challenges faced by Export market, to understand the nature & the type of
business, to understand about the challenges faced by Businessman, to
understand the relevant schemes and about the various subsidies needed to
the Businessman and to study the impact or GST on the small business.
xiii
Vashi, one of the oldest and most populated industrial nodes in Navi Mumbai,
is home to many industries, traders, and even IT companies. The city is also
home to APMC (Agricultural Produce Market Committee), the biggest
wholesale agriculture produce market in Asia. The agricultural produce market
covers all of 170 acres. There are a staggering 3700 Godowns, 1500
Commercial blocks, 4 large Auction halls, 2 Giant warehouses, and 5 large
Wholesale market yards. Apart from this, there are big processing centres - a
vapour heat treatment plant, ripening facilities, cold storage facilities, and an
export facilitation centre and so on.
Over 12000 tonnes of Agri-commodities arrive daily into this market. The
produce is sold by auction and the prices are noted and managed by the
Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committee. It is the committee's
responsibility to ensure that sales do not take place below the minimum price
fixed by the government. They are also responsible for ensuring fair
measurement and weighing, and fair charges for labour.
The Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC) at Vashi, barely 35 km
from the main Mumbai city, is one of Maharashtra’s 305 regulated mandis
where produce is first traded before being taken for consumption elsewhere.
While the smallest of these may have a yearly turnover of below Rs 25 lakh,
the Vashi APMC is the largest and a terminal market receiving daily over
2,000 trucks that ferry produce from both within and outside Maharashtra. In
Maharashtra, the Agriculture Produce Market Committees (APMCs) are
having 294 main market yards and 612 sub market yards and all are
functioning currently. However, these functioning markets have a number of
inadequacies in market facilities. The Government of Maharashtra (GoM),
through its nodal agency for agriculture marketing, Maharashtra State
Agriculture Marketing Board (MASMB) and in this context has approached the
World Bank for financial assistance.
Indian agriculture has greatly contributed to foreign trade even in its traditional
form. Indian Agricultural products have been facing stiff competition from
Asian countries for quite some times. Due to globalisation and liberalised
xiv
regime, this competition is likely to increase further and new initiatives in
agriculture development shall have to meet the emerging challenges. The
performance of agriculture after integration with the world markets is linked to
the success of exports. In its bid to increase overall exports, the government
of India has decided to achieve this objective by giving a push to production
and export of agricultural commodities. Agriculture has been a source of
foreign exchange for India in the past. Most of the export earnings of
agriculture came from the conventional items such as tea, cashew and spices.
India's share in the world agricultural exports is very low in many items. Until
the beginning of the early seventies India has been an importer of a number
of agricultural commodities. With the exception of a few commodities like rice,
cotton, tea, coffee, oilseeds, oil cakes, tobacco and spices, the share of
agricultural export of India in total world trade was very insignificant. The
share is particularly low in the world trade of fish, meat, chicken, vegetables
and fruits. India has made substantial strides in the total world production of
many commodities. However, its share in the export market is relatively very
small. The pertinent questions of marketable surplus and export surplus are
ailing the export potentials of Indian agricultural products. Nevertheless, the
country has made phenomenal efforts in enhancing the agricultural exports.
The present case study is based on the study of the small market exporter’s
ideology. According to the knowledgeable source, the sample size of small
Exporter has been selected residing in Vashi APMC Market, NaviMumbai
area for the convenience of sampling. Stratified Random Sampling method
has been followed for collecting primary and secondary data. There are
around 2000 exporters and only 50 % of them are in regular export business,
which includes Status holders, multi-product merchant exporters and
manufacturer exporters. Hence, from the population of 1000 active exporters
sample sizes of 10% (i.e. 100 exporters) have been selected on random from
APMC Market, Vashi NaviMumbai covering all product groups. More than
60% of the sample size was from SMEs. The rationale behind selecting more
SMEs in the sample size was that they contribute more than 50% to total
exports.
Type of Sampling – Stratified Random Sampling.
xv
The statistical analysis of data tells that the responses observed from each
item in the questionnaire were scored and tabulated into a master sheet. Data
was analysed and interpret with the help of graph and pie charts.
The interpretation and report writing tells that the analyzed data were
finally interpreted to draw the conclusions and reported with the objective of
the study in view.
The limitation of the research is confined to multi-product groups and
markets; hence, the findings will be generic in nature.
The expected benefits of the findings of research is to upgrade their
services and improve their competitiveness, Exporters will gain knowledge
and information for better performance, State Governments to prepare the
export strategy for the State and Ministry of Commerce to take corrective
policy measures.
The probable outcome of the study will focus on how to enhance the
various subsidies provided or currently needed to them and on various
schemes that are provided and currently needed to them by conducting
primary research using a coded questionnaire targeted at APMC Market;
Vashi NaviMumbai Businessman has to get a viewpoint. In addition,
secondary research into innovative learning approaches will help create a
well-rounded recommendation of actions to be taken in order to enhance
various subsidies provided or currently needed to them and on various
schemes that are provided and currently needed to them.
The in-depth details study will be more helpful to Exporter of APMC Kirana
Market Vashi NaviMumbai. The following aspects will add value to relevant
schemes and about the various subsidies needed to the Businessman, which
are:
xvi
Focusing on the various Schemes provided to the Exporters of APMC
Market, Vashi NaviMumbai
Focusing on the various Subsidies provided to the APMC Market,
Vashi NaviMumbai.
Focusing on the various Schemes needed to the Exporters of APMC
Market, Vashi NaviMumbai.
Focusing on the various Subsidies needed to the APMC Market, Vashi
NaviMumbai.
Provided dedicate pathway that enables exporters to increase their
business domestically and internationally.
The study in nutshell will enable all exporters to assimilate new approaches
and benefits to better resources utilization and higher success rates.
Due to global expansion in food trade, the World Trade Organization (WTO)
has set as one of their objectives the opening up of trade between countries
and aims to address restrictive trade barriers. Sanitary and phyto-sanitary
(SPS) issues have always been important in global trade and have become
one of the most important potential Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT). Pests
or pathogens may exist in one country but not in another, thus ultimately
resulting in restrictive TBT. In addition, food safety has become one of the
most important minimum requirements for future trade with developed
countries.
The rapid increase in newly reported cases of outbreaks of food-borne
diseases particularly associated with fresh produce has been the primary
drive towards establishing minimum food safety standards. To be part of
global trade in fresh produce and food related products it will in future require
compliance to some kind of food safety assurance system.
The global drive towards ensuring safe food supplies must also be seen as
part of the focus on food security. Safe food must be ensured in both
developed and developing countries. The global emphasis on safe and secure
xvii
food supplies also sees against a backdrop of an increasing number of
diseases in developing countries. With respect to developed countries, such
often associated with the consumption of fresh or processed food. In this
scenario, the importance of microbial contamination is of major concern and
has been the driving force behind the establishment of the USA Good
Agricultural Practices (GAP) policies and surveillance systems. Currently,
there are numerous systems that growers can adopt to ensure safe food
production, which include amongst others Good Agricultural Practices (GAP),
Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points
(HACCP), Good Hygiene Practices etc. One of the GAP systems that have
taken off within the European community is GLOBALGAP.
Apart from Germany and France, most other countries within the EU support
this system, as do the major retailers, which consider it the minimum standard
for food trade. It is important to note that these global standards will hopefully
be harmonized but for the time being, major retailers still have their own set of
requirements that growers will have to adhere to.
After a complete study on data analysis and interpretation, conclusion
drawen from the study is that Majority of the respondents are Dry fruits
Exporters &their monthly turnover is above 50 Lakhs they are dealing in
export and import of Vegetables, Fruits, Food Grains, Nuts, Dry Fruits, and
many other products. As per the further survey respondents import and export
their goods from foreign countries and it seems that while trading they are
facing many problems. Majority of the respondents are getting Bank Support
& Transportation as a help from the government they are not aware of any
promotional measures offered by the Government respondentsare beneficial
to have clusters like the APMC Market, which will help in promoting
export/import of goods. Majority of the respondents are not facing any kind of
challenges due to ‘Make in India’ concept brought by an Indian government
and are saying that ‘GST’ bill is useful to expand their Export/Import of goods
business.
xviii
So moving towards recommendation and conclusion APMC should create
more focused and cohesive efforts to help and assist exporters to penetrate
into new markets and support them wherever necessary. The ultimate result
of this should be to make India stand in the forefront in creating the Brand
India concept of the government, based on the policy announcements.
Another important point is that the APMC should act as a catalyst for timely
disbursement of the incentives falling under their purview. Additional
incentives announced under the special focus initiative as per the policy for
both focus products and focus markets are made available to all the eligible
exporters well in time and this will be a highly motivating factor for the
exporters. APMC should also understand that any delay happening in
disbursement of the incentives or delay in recommending for the same would
result in exporters losing faith in the government and their announcements.
Hosting an interactive website, and more focussed newsletters providing the
changes in various laws/ statutes affecting exports/imports of different
countries and regularly updating the website with such changes will be a
welcome measure as this helps to keep the exporters abreast of the basic
information. APMC should add quality improvement in their agenda in
conducting training and updating programme in the commercial fields. Risk
management and mitigation of risk, spreading the importance of various
insurances and their impact on the sustenance of business should be made
as a part of the workshops / training programmes / seminars etc. Ultimately,
the members should understand that covering the risk should not be seen as
statutory requirements, but it is for the safety of their own business. APMC
mainly network with Indian embassies abroad. This should be made wider by
networking with other global trade promotion organisations and benefits of
outcome / knowledge / information to be passed on to members.
Finally, timely and quick response of APMC should be their agenda of
operations as time is an important factor in international trade and ultimately
time is money.
1
CHAPTER – 1
Introduction
India is the Agricultural country and 65 % to 70 % people are related with
agriculture. They are totally depending upon monsoon. They also believe in
luck. In the past when money is not available means Barter systems the
farmers used exchange their goods with others and take that goods which he
required. So there is no need to agricultural market. But at now the money is a
main thing and satisfy the human wants through money. So farmer needs the
market when he sold his product to customer with protection. Agricultural
Marketing is an area for the "second generation" of green revolution
problems. Indian Marketing is undergoing a significant metamorphosis
because of economic liberalization and globalization. Infrastructure
development is the critical factor for determining the success of market-
oriented strategy and macro-economic policies in developing countries. Both
national and global players are trying to capture the urban markets of India,
which has already reached a saturation level, and it is extremely difficult to tap
the urban markets with high profit margin. In export market, a firm has to face
challenges from Multi-National Corporate (MNCs), other foreign companies
and domestic firms of the concerned export markets. While urban market or
export market is difficult to plough, rural market is relatively easy and feasible
to cultivate, in India.
They buy the agricultural product to desire quantity and desire quality. The
customer or merchant gets benefit to purchase the product at one place and
government price. Due to this market all types of wages or expenses related
with to sell its product is on merchant not on farmer. Farmers are enjoying the
benefit to sell his product to merchant or not at decided price. Government
decides the price of different agricultural product so that at all level price is
same. This market protect to farmers against the misleading or unfair trade
practice. The agricultural market is very much helpful to the farmer and the
customers or whole seller merchant because all types of goods are available
on one place.
2
Vashi, one of the oldest and most populated industrial nodes in Navi Mumbai,
is home to many industries, traders, and even IT companies. The city is also
home to APMC (Agricultural Produce Market Committee), the biggest
wholesale agriculture produce market in Asia. The agricultural produce market
covers all of 170 acres. There are a staggering 3700 Go downs, 1500
Commercial blocks, 4 large Auction halls, 2 Giant warehouses, and 5 large
Wholesale market yards. Apart from this, there are big processing centres - a
vapour heat treatment plant, ripening facilities, cold storage facilities, an
export facilitation centre and so on. Over 12000 tonnes of Agri-commodities
arrive daily into this market. The produce is sold by auction and the prices are
noted and managed by the Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committee. It
is the committee's responsibility to ensure that sales do not take place below
the minimum price fixed by the government. They are also responsible for
ensuring fair measurement and weighing, and fair charges for labour.
MSAMB has the program to promote exports of fresh fruits, vegetables &
flowers from Maharashtra to the various countries of world with the help of
farmers & their organizations. The main products handled are grapes,
mangoes, cashew nut, Turmeric etc. It‘s a place where more than Rs 10,000
crore worth of fruits, vegetables and other farm produce gets traded annually.
But right now, it‘s also the scene of a prabodhan, a mass awakening
campaign by traders and commission agents that could gather pace in the
days ahead.
The Government of Maharashtra (GoM), through its nodal agency for
agriculture marketing, Maharashtra State Agriculture Marketing Board
(MASMB) and in this context has approached the World Bank for financial
assistance. Marketing and trade, as an activity comes at latter part of the
value chain for any commodity and yet it is the most important determinant for
all other activities. All the input expenses for labour, materials and capital are
rewarded at this stage, which shall include some incentive over and above
inputs. Agricultural products, in a developing country remain in uniform
demand throughout year, while production of most of them is concentrated in
some part of the year. This results in fluctuation in prices which can change
3
equations of profit for the farmer. Apart from this, in a federal and diverse
country, every state or region has diverse resources, consumption patterns
and rules regarding taxation, levies, sale etc., which makes numerous hurdles
in interstate trade. Integration of all the regional markets into national market
is desirable in interest of both farmers and consumers. Farmers will get
rewarding prices even if demand is not there in their region, on other hand if
there is less production in a state, consumer will still be able to get products at
reasonable prices. Same is true for international markets, we have seen few
years back when prices of sugar were up swinging, and then sugar imported
from Brazil came to rescue Indian consumers. However, integration of
national and international markets, at times can make domestic and regional
farmer vulnerable because of external forces. For these reasonable regulation
is imperative. In last article we read about procurement and disbursal by
government which involves about 33% of total production of food grains.
Another, 33% is captively consumed by farmers and residue is left for open
markets. Trade of this quantity is also heavily regulated by the government
through APMC act and various taxes and levies. So, less quantity left in
market is in itself a strong reason for price rise, which is further supplemented
by monopoly of government in open market. Further, under current system
there are number of intermediaries who add little value to the product, but
increase price dramatically by commissions or trading margins. This all
coupled with lack of integration of market leaves farmers and consumer
vulnerable alike.
1. Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) Act
a) Purpose
Agriculture is a state subject and almost all state governments enacted APMC
act in 1950‘s or so, to bring transparency and end discretion of traders. This is
extension of overall government policy which is directed toward food security,
remunerative prices to farmers and fair prices to consumers. However,
widespread perception for this act is that it has worked contrary to almost
every stated objective, at least in recent past. It should be noted that though
current system controlled by APMC is quite inefficient, yet it is far
4
improvement from pre-APMC/50‘s era. At that time there was no control at all.
Money lender, traders, bankers etc. were often one person. This all in one
role of middleman resulted in perpetual indebtness of farmer. Under the
APMC acts, States are geographically divided in to markets which are headed
by market committees and any production in that area shall be brought to a
market committee for sale. This is applicable to ‗notified agricultural products‘
which differs from state to state and generally includes most of the important
cereals, vegetables and other horticulture products. Notified products are
meant to be brought to the market committee and auctioned in presence of
the farmer.
In this Market committee (popularly called Mandi) there are commissions
agents (called arhatiyas) who hold license and are allotted a shop in the
market. Farmer and buyer have discretion to go to any agent in this market,
based on personal relations. Normally farmers chose agents from their own
village and are influenced by age old relations of money lending. There are
huge numbers of commission agents in a particular APMC dealing in same
crop, which results in constant price discovery and adjustments for that
particular crop.
At same time buyers, which may be rice mill, flour mills, cotton ginning mill
owners, come to procure these products. They make their bids and if these
bids are fair, will give best return to farmers. But unfortunately this is not so.
An APMC Yard
b) Shortcomings in Current APMC system
1. Monopoly of APMC – Monopoly of any trade (barring few exceptions) is
bad, whether it is by some MNC corporation by government or by any APMC.
It deprives farmers from better customers, and consumers from original
suppliers.
5
2. Cartelization – It is quite often seen that agents in an APMC get together
to form a cartel and deliberately restraint from higher bidding. Produce is
procured at manipulatively discovered price and sold at higher price. Spoils
are then shared by participants, leaving farmers in lurch.
3. Entry Barriers – License fee in these markets are highly prohibitive. In
many markets farmers were not allowed to operate. Further, over and above
license fee, rent/value for shops is quite high which keeps away competition.
At most places only a group of village/urban elite operates in APMC.
4. Conflict of Interest – APMC play dual role of regulator and Market.
Consequently its role as regulator is undermined by vested interest in
lucrative trade. They despite of inefficiency won‘t let go any control. Generally,
member and chairman are nominated/elected out of the agents operating in
that market.
5. High commission, taxes and levies- Farmers have to pay commission,
marketing fee, APMC cess which pushes up costs. Apart from this many
states impose Value Added Tax.
6. Other Manipulations – Agents have tendency to block a part of payment
for unexplained or fictitious reasons. Farmer is sometimes refused payment
slip (which acknowledges sale and payment) which is essential for him to get
loan.
c) APMC model act
Taking these concerns into cognizance, Central Government appointed a
working group which recommended a Model APMC act. Salient features are –
1. Farmer doesn‘t need to bring his produce to APMC Mandi. He can directly
sell it to whomever he wants. But, if he doesn‘t bring his produce to
Mandi, then he can‘t stand for election in that APMC marketing
committee. It allows alternate markets such as direct purchase centers,
private market yards/mandis.
6
2. It increased responsibility of APMCs on following lines –
Full payment should be made on day of sale itself.
Quantity brought and prices should be displayed near arrival gate. Its
being done electronically in many APMCs
Promote private partnership in management of APMCs
It shall make efforts to build facilities for Processing and other value
additions
Ensuring transparency in Pricing and Transactions in the market
3. It allows Public Private Partnership in the ‗management and development‘
of agricultural markets in the country for post-harvest handling, cold
storage, pre-cooling facilities, pack houses etc.
4. It not only allows, but strongly advocates for contract farming. It also
provides for dispute resolution mechanism.
5. It mandates establish ‗State Agricultural Produce Marketing Standards
Bureau‘ for Grading, Standardization and Quality Certification.
6. It provides for abolishment of commission agent system. Payments will be
made for facilities such as grading, sorting, and processing.
APMC model act is a sort of roadmap for states for their respective APMC
acts which shall be amended. States has adopted Model APMC in piecemeal
manner as per vested interests of various pressure groups. Most of states
haven‘t abolished system of commission agents as they constitute influential
people.
Bihar repealed APMC act in 2006, while Kerala never had any APMC act, but
situation is no better there as thrust on development alternate markets is
lacking. Demand is just to dismantle monopoly of state regulated APMCs and
increase competition. APMC can continue and with competition they can get
efficient overtime.
7
Why model APMC Act is also considered inappropriate?
The model legislation has actually given rise to a conflict of interest, as the
APMC, which is a major player, is also the regulator/registering authority.
There is reluctance on part of state governments to reform the APMC
legislation, as it generates huge revenues. Some states have created entry
barriers by prescribing either prohibitive license fees for setting up such
markets, or the minimum distance between private markets and APMC
markets.
d) Economic Survey on APMC act
a. The provisions of the State Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee
(APMC) Acts have prevented creation of competitive conditions in the
distribution of commodities and creation of a national market for agricultural
commodities. Multiple layers of intermediation in the distribution of food
articles have also pushed up prices for consumers. It is therefore necessary to
focus on distribution channels and on reducing food wastage in the supply
chain.
b. The liberalization of 1991 focused on the industrial sector. While
industry was liberalized and allowed to buy from, and sell to, anyone in the
world, Indian farmers in many states, are still required to buy and sell only in
the government-designated Agricultural Produce and Marketing Committees
(APMC) to licensed entities. Farmers are not allowed to sell their produce
directly to the consumers. A national market for food is yet to develop.
c. Interventions by the government are problematic. The first is the maze
of restrictions on transactions and storage. This includes state-level APMC
laws, the Essential Commodities Act, and the administrative measures at local
and state levels that distort the decision to grow and the decision to store.
8
d. State APMC laws are a major hurdle to modernization of the food
economy. They have artificially created cartels of buyers who possess market
power. The proposed Model APMC Act 2003 is an inadequate solution, as
APMCs remain a non-level playing field.
e. To create a national market the central government needs to use
powers under the Union List and the Concurrent List of the Seventh Schedule
of the Constitution to end the monopoly powers of the APMCs and replace
other punitive and coercive state laws affecting the food market.
f. Apart from breaking the monopoly and dissuading state governments
from treating the APMCs as liberal sources of revenue, substantive efforts
have to be made to create alternative trading platforms in the private sector
where it is possible to reduce the layers of intermediation. Since this may take
time, fruits and vegetables should be taken out of the purview of the APMC
Acts immediately. A processor should be able to buy directly from farmers
without having to pay any Mandi fee/tax to the APMC.
i. Permit sale and purchase of all perishable commodities such as fruits
and vegetables, milk and fish in any market. This could later be
extended to all agricultural produce.
ii. Exempt market fee on fruits and vegetables and reduce the high
incidence of commission charges on agricultural/horticultural produce.
iii. Taking a cue from the success of direct marketing efforts of states, the
APMC/other market infrastructure may be used to organize farmers
markets. FPOs/self-help groups (SHGs) can be encouraged to organize
farmers markets near urban centers, malls, etc. that have large open
spaces. These could be organized every day or on weekends,
depending on the concentration of footfalls.
9
iv. Include ‗facilitating organization of farmers markets‘ under the permitted
list of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities under
Companies Act 2013, to encourage companies engaged in agri-allied
activities, food processing etc. to take up this activity under CSR and
also help in setting up supply chain infrastructure. This would be similar
to the e-Choupal initiative of ITC Ltd., but under CSR.
v. All the above facilitators can also tie-up a link to the commodity
exchanges‟ platform to disseminate spot and futures prices of
agricultural commodities.
Some measures that would facilitate the creation of a barrier-free
national market are:
1. Alternate Marketing Channels
a) Direct Marketing
APMC model act promotes direct marketing. As farmer is allowed to sell his
goods outside APMC, he can now under APMC model act, directly sell to
consumer. This completely eliminates middleman and narrows gap between
farmer‘s sale price and price paid by consumer.
There are numerous successful examples all over India such as ApniMandi in
Punjab, Rythu Bazar in Andhra Pradesh, UzhavarSandhai in TN, Shetkari
Bazaar in Maharashtra, Hadaspur Vegetable Market in Pune, Krushak Bazaar
in Odisha and KisanMandi in Rajasthan.Central government sponsors
‗Agricultural marketing Infrastructure, Grading & standardization Scheme‘ for
development of infrastructure for direct marketing in which capital subsidy of
25% is available (33.33% in NE states).
10
b) Contract Farming
Under contract farming inputs material may be provided by purchasing party
for a particular crop and there is a crop buyback agreement in advance
Quality is specified in advance. This is mainly entered into by big corporates
who are in business of food processing. So far there has been mixed results.
It removes uncertainty of Income for the farmer and he can fetch good prices.
But this all depends upon ready availability of genuine information about the
market trends. It is seen that there is stark information asymmetry between
corporates and farmers. This open up avenues for exploitation of farmers as
these are long term contracts, once agreed by farmer at lower price, market
price doesn‘t matter for contract period.
c) Future contracts and „negotiable warehouse receipts‟ in agriculture
A futures contract is a contract between two parties where both parties agree
to buy and sell a particular asset of specific quantity and at a predetermined
price, at a specified date in future. Let‘s take example of an Exporter –
Exporter sells goods to USA at 3 month credit at $ 1 lakh. At this time
exchange rate of 1$ is Rs 60. So he expects to receive Rs 60 lakh After 3
months. But in 3 months exchange rate can go down to Rs 57. This will cause
him loss of Rs 3 lakhs.
So, at time of sale, exporter can enter into ‗currency futures‘ sale contract. He
will enter into contract with banker under which banker promises to:
1. Buy dollars after 3 months,
2. Fixed quantity i.e. $ 1 lakh,
3. At predetermined rate – whatever rate is going in market for ‗3 months
currency futures‘
At end date, contract may be either settled by delivery of dollars by exporter to
bank (at predetermined price/contract price) or by settling price difference
market and contract price in cash. These contracts between two parties are
11
tradable like commodities on various exchanges. Note that, whenever
exchange rate of a $ will vary, (below or beyond Rs 60) it will influence value
of the contract itself.
Hence, these contracts are instruments for Risk management, price
discovery and trading. This trading attracts intense scrutiny of market
analysts for prediction of future trends of demand and supply, which in turn
yield much useful data for manufacturers and producers. This has much utility
for the farmers as they can decode future trends and plan their production
accordingly. Farmer can similarly sell his production in advance in futures
market and buyers can buy in futures market.
In 2003 futures trading in all agricultural commodities was allowed and in
2007 The Warehousing (development and Regulation) Act, 2007 was passed.
This created „Warehousing Development and Regulating Authority‟
(WDRA). WDRA introduced a concept of „Negotiable Warehouse
Receipt‟. There are WDRA certified warehouses all over India, in which
farmers can deposit there produce and they will get a receipt (Negotiable
Warehouse Receipt) acknowledging quantity, type, category etc. of crop.
This receipt can be used by farmers to get loans, to make payments or to
settle any other type of claim. This receipt will be accepted by any ‗certified
warehouse‘ in India and possessor of this receipt can get quantity mentioned
in it. The Negotiable Warehouse Receipts (NWR) system aimed at not only
helping the farmers to avail better credit facilities and avoid distress sale but
will also to safeguard financial institutions by mitigating risks inherent in credit
extension to farmers. However, this to work effectively need a market based
economy and free determination of prices. Various commodities are time and
again banned for futures trading which keeps farmers and investors away.
Further, there was scam in commodity exchange NSEL; it was found that
stock of underlying assets, on basis of which contracts were entered, didn‘t
existed. Consequently, NSEL failed to settle its contracts.
12
2. International Trade
India is among largest producers for products like wheat, rice, milk, pulses
etc., but its share in agro global trade is much lower. This is partially due to
heavy domestic consumption and rest due to non-coherent and unpredictable
policies. There are quantitative restrictions which differ from crop to crop
and time to time. Few years back cotton exports were suddenly banned after
domestic prices rise and soon ban was lifted. There are export quotas,
beyond which export is not allowed.
Trade of basmati rice was liberalized in 1990‘s and since then its prices are
almost integrated to international prices which are more remunerative to
farmers.
Exports of agro product were valued at USD 32.3 billion in 2013-14, a jump of
122 per cent from 2008-09. But big part of this was offloading of surplus
stocks by FCI in foreign markets.
Import of one lakh tons of rice was undertaken over a five month period from
Myanmar for augmenting the TPDS supplies in the north-eastern states. Such
avenues need to be explored especially as they could be more economical
than transporting rice from surplus states like Punjab or AP, and would limit
FCI‘s Procurement, and consequently, distortion, in the domestic market.
3. Essential Commodities Act
The EC Act, 1955 provides for the ‗regulation and control‘
of production, distribution and pricing of commodities which are declared
as essential for:
1. maintaining or increasing supplies or
2. for securing their equitable distribution and
3. Availability at fair prices.
13
Major commodities are covered under the act. Some of them are:
i. Petroleum and its products, including petrol, diesel, kerosene, Naphtha,
solvents etc.
ii. Foodstuff, including edible oil and seeds, vanaspati, pulses, sugarcane
and its products like, khandsari and sugar, rice paddy
iii. Jute and textiles
iv. Drugs- prices of essential drugs are still controlled by the DPCO
v. Fertilizers- the Fertilizer Control Order prescribes restrictions on transfer
and stock of fertilizers apart from prices.
The Drug Price Control Order (DPCO) or Fertilizer Control Order and such
other orders have also been issued under the powers of the ECA.
The Act is thus pro-consumer and impacts at the level of the wholesaler and
retailer. The Act empowers the Centre to order states to impose stock limits
and bring hoarders to task, in order to increase supplies and cool prices.
Generally the Centre specifies upper limits in the case of stock holding and
states prescribe specific limits. However, in case there is a difference between
states and the Centre, the act specifies that the latter will prevail.
In 2002 and 2003 an order was passed removing the licensing requirements,
stock limits and movement restrictions on all specified foodstuffs. These
orders allowed dealers to freely buy, stock, sell, transport, distribute, dispose,
acquire, use or consume any quantity in respect of rice/paddy, wheat, coarse
grains, sugar, edible oils and oilseeds, pulses, jagery, Wheat products etc.
However, later in 2006 due to price rise in agro products, state governments
requested for restoration of powers under EC act and it was done by central
government. Since then there have been regular on and off policy. Different
states put different limits on stock. As of now only sugar and wheat stands
denotified by central government. Recently potato and onions were added to
the list as inflation control measure.
14
While it is true that at times hoarding of commodities can cause shortage in
market, yet ban on stocking runs contradictory to government policy directed
toward food processing and cold storage. If an entrepreneur invests in cold
storage facility, he is supposed to stock something to utilize storage space
and for profit. Ban on storage can demotivate investment storage capacities.
Further, thrust should be on dismantling incentives to stock products for long
period. From long experience it has been seen that government has limited
capacity to restrict illegal stocking. In this scenario inter-regional and inter-
temporal variation in prices of crops should be brought down. As already said,
most crops are produced seasonally, but are consumed throughout the year.
Uniform supplies of these crops throughout year can be insured by increasing
competition at middle of supply chain i.e. between wholesalers/retailers. This
shall be supplemented by adequate investment in supply chain infrastructure.
As we have seen most of these institutions were designed in 1950‘s and 60‘s
in response to formidable challenges of food security and farmer protection.
This was followed by green revolution, then by liberalization of economy. This
gave India abundance of grains and new trading mechanism like futures,
NWR came to fore. In all these changes, reformation and redefinition of role of
these institutions was overlooked. Consequently, they gradually moved in
opposite directions. To hold them together, government needs to make a
coherent policy to redefine role of these institution and underlying
mechanisms.
Recognizing that a competitive market, besides adding to the welfare of the
producers and consumers also plays a contributory role in poverty alleviation,
the recent Budget also highlighted that farmers and consumers‘ interest will
be further served by increasing competition and integrating markets across
the country. While these are discrete measures, a holistic policy with across-
the-board reforms would enable the Indian agricultural market to cross the
Rubicon and progress towards Achieving Pareto efficiency.
15
Policies Related to Agriculture Marketing
In addition, some of policies related to agriculture marketing were reviewed as
briefed below.
a) Model APMC Act:
This Act was formulated with a view to promote development of competitive
marketing infrastructure and bringing professionalism in the management of
existing market structures besides safeguarding the interest of farmers. The
Act provides space for establishment of Private Markets/yards, Direct
Purchase Centres, and Consumer/Farmers Markets for direct sale and
promotion of Public Private Partnership.
b) Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (regulation)
(Amendment) Act 2005:
Based on the model APMC Act, GoM made amendments to the existing
APMC Act titled Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (regulation)
(Amendment) Act 2005. This Act stipulates granting of licenses subject to
terms and conditions for direct marketing or establishing private markets.
The Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC) at Vashi, barely 35 km
from the main Mumbai city, is one of Maharashtra‘s 305 regulated mandis
where produce is first traded before being taken for consumption elsewhere.
While the smallest of these may have a yearly turnover of below Rs 25 lakh,
the Vashi APMC is the largest and also a terminal market receiving daily over
2,000 trucks that ferry produce from both within and outside Maharashtra. As
on today the period of elected directors body which was begins from
2.12.2008 dissolved by Government order on 2.12.2014 and the Administrator
Shri Manoj Saunik, I.A.S. officer was appointed by Government on Mumbai
APMC., Mumbai.
16
1. General Information:
a) Establishment year/objectives –
Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committee has been established on 15th
January, 19777 under the provisions of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce
Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963. It is a Body Corporate under Section 12 of
the said Act. Amongst others, main objectives of establishment of Mumbai
APMC are- to develop modern market yards for agricultural commodities,
regulation of marketing of agricultural commodities, help the farmers to fetch
better price for their produce, create infrastructural facilities for orderly
development of trade, to maintain and manage the markets and stipulate
conditions for use of markets within the market area. The Committee has
been established with objectives of regulation of marketing of agricultural and
certain other produce therein, establishment of markets therefore and for such
incidental purposes. The Committee is required to regulate and supervise the
marketing of agricultural produce in accordance with the provisions of the said
Act, Rules made there under and Byelaws of the Market Committee. It is
empowered to regulate entry of persons and vehicles as well as to take all
possible steps to prevent adulteration and to promote and organize grading
and standardization. The Committee is required to collect, maintain and
supply information in respect of productions as well as storage, processing,
prices and movement of the notified agricultural produce.
b) Constitution – Board – Representatives
Election of Mumbai APMC was held on 31.10.2008 and as per new provisions
of sections 13(1A) (1B), (3), (4) and (5) of the Maharashtra Agricultural
Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, the Board of
Directors of Mumbai APMC consists of 27 members i.e. 12 agriculturists
members 2 each from 6 Revenue Divisions, 5 traders representatives 1 each
from declared wholesale markets, representatives of mathadi and mapadi
workers, 5 Government nominated representatives, 1 member from Navi
Mumbai Municipal Corporation, 1 member from Brihan Mumbai Municipal
Corporation and the Directors of Mumbai, Maharashtra State, Pune.
17
d) Executive Management Structure and staff –
Secretary and Hierarchy below –
Present staff strength of Mumbai APMC is 622 working in various cadres.
Mumbai APMC is headed by the Secretary assisted by 2 joint Secretaries.
Chief Accounts Officer, Superintending Engineer, Executive Engineers,
Senior System Analyst, Deputy Secretaries and other staff. The organizational
set up is as appended.
e) Subcommittees –
Executive Sub-Committee, Construction Sub-Committee,
Staff Sub-Committee, License Sub-Committee,
Dispute Settlement Sub-Committee, Grading Sub-Committee:
f) Marketing Details During the year 2013-14 to 2015-16 (in M.T.)
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
g) Recovery of Market Fees for the last 5 years (Rs. In Lakhs)
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
18
h) Supervision Charges paid to the State Government during last 5 years
(Rs. In Lakhs)
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
i) Total land – (a Main Yards-)
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
(b) Land available for expansion for putting up modern infrastructure –
City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. Has
earmarked 122 hectares of land for development of market yards of
agricultural commodities, from which CIDCO has handed over a land of about
69 hectares to Mumbai APMC on which 7 Wholesale Market Yards with 3788
shop-cum-godowns, 1591 office blocks, 4 Auction Halls, 2 Warehouses, 5
Central Facility Buildings, 2 Exporters Buildings, etc. are developed by the
Mumbai APMC.
j) Infrastructures – Main Yard-
Central Facility Buildings, Guest House, Police Stations, Canteens, Banks,
Post Office, Dispensary, Electronic Telephone Exchange (EPABX), Farmers
Rest House, Weighing Machines, Weighbridges, Sulabh Souchalaya,
Ripening Chamber, Auction Halls, Common Warehouses, Cold Drinking
Water Centres, etc.
19
k) Number of Licensed market functionaries: (For the Period ending 31st
March, 2016)
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
L) Income and Expenditure of APMC for last 5 years- (31st March, 2016)
(Rs. In Lakhs)
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
20
m) To curb the unauthorized trade:
As per the provisions of section 6 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce
Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, wholesale trade of the agricultural produce
under regulation of the APMC, must be done in the declared Market Yards of
the MAPMC, as notified by the Director of Marketing, Maharashtra State,
Pune. In order to curb the unauthorized trade, MAPMC has initiated the
various steps against those who are involved in unauthorized trade of
agricultural produce in the jurisdiction of Mumbai APMC.
n) Setting up of Check Nakas:
The Mumbai APMC has set up its own Check Nakas adjacent to the Octori
Nakas of Brihan Mumbai Mahanagarpalika, wherein 60 employees of the
MAPMC are working in 3 shifts at 24 hours. The vehicles carrying the
regulated agricultural produce are permitted to enter Mumbai City, after
verification of Mumbai Entry Pass and such other documents submitted by the
vehicle owners at the Check Nakas.
The Vigilance Squad is set up to intercept the vehicles carrying agricultural
produce unauthorisedly in the jurisdiction of Mumbai APMC. This Vigiliance
Squad is provided with vehicles and controlling staff in order to have
maximum output. The regulated agricultural produce arriving at various
Railway Stations at Mumbai is diverted to various declared wholesale Market
Yards at Navi Mumbai by the vigilance Squad. A Vigilance Squad has also
been empowered to intercept the vehicles carrying agricultural produce
unauthorisedly and to take penal action against the vehicles under the
provisions of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development &
Regulation) Act, 1963, Rules and Bylaws made there under.
21
Details of the vehicles seized by the Vigilance Squad and penalties recovered
from the owners during the last 5 years are as under: -
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
2. Issues related to reforms:
a) Licensing:
i) Types of licenses –
As per the provisions of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing
(Regulation) Act, 1963, every functionary involved in sale and purchase of
agricultural produce has obtain license for operating inthe market yards/area
of Mumbai APMC. There are various types of licenses such as – commission
agent, trader, mapadi or in any other capacity in relation to the marketing of
the declared agricultural produce.
ii) Licenses for traders-producers and practices-
Subject to the rules made in behalf of the grant of licenses to the various
functionaries, a market committee may, after making inquiries as it deems fit,
grant or renew a license for the use of any place in the market area for
marketing of the agricultural produce or for operating therein as a trader,
commission agent or in any other recording its reasons in writing therefore,
refuse to grant or renew any such license.
b) Plot Allotment-
Seven plots, under the category of Warehousing plots, admeasuring about 70
hectares, are allotted by CIDCO to Mumbai AOMC, on which Market Yards for
various agricultural produce such as Foodgrains, Pulses, Condiments and
Spices, Sugar, Fruits & Vegetable, Onion & Potato, etc. are set up. The said
plots are allotted for lease tenure of 60 years.
22
c) Transparency of operations -
In order to have transparency in the working, MAPMC is committed to have
open auction of agricultural produce in market. In the markets, electronic
weighing scale, are provided. In order to facilitate farmers and as provided in
the Act, payment of agricultural produce is made within 24 hours. Market
information Display Boards are provided to know details of arrivals, prices,
etc. So also E-trading Terminals (MCX/NCDEX) are provided. Details of entry
and exit of each and every vehicle in the market complex are recorded.
Electronic open auction system will be set up.
d) Commitment of APMC:
MAPMC is committed to develop infrastructure by investing in PPP mode. It
also committed to set up electronic auction system on the basis of Flower
Market at Netherlands. It also willing to undertake market reforms by adopting
model byelaws so as to have fare competition and equal level playing field in
trade and practices. It will also adopt various modalities for smooth flow of
funds and its proper utilization as provided in the Act.
e) Outsourcing-
So far as outsourcing of various services, Services such as Security,
Canteens, Drinking Water, Gardening, Garbage disposal, etc. are looked after
by private agencies appointed for the purpose by MAPMC.
23
CHAPTER– 2
Literature Review & Research Gap Identified
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Indian agriculture has greatly contributed to foreign trade even in its traditional
form. Indian Agricultural products have been facing stiff competition from
Asian countries for quite some times. Due to globalisation and liberalised
regime, this competition is likely to increase further and new initiatives in
agriculture development shall have to meet the emerging challenges. The
performance of agriculture after integration with the world markets is linked to
the success of exports. In its bid to increase overall exports, the government
of India has decided to achieve this objective by giving a push to production
and export of agricultural commodities. Agriculture has been a source of
foreign exchange for India in the past. Most of the export earnings of
agriculture came from the conventional items such as tea, cashew and spices.
India's share in the world agricultural exports is very low in many items. Until
the beginning of the early seventies India has been an importer of a number
of agricultural commodities. With the exception of a few commodities like rice,
cotton, tea, coffee, oilseeds, oil cakes, tobacco and spices, the share of
agricultural export of India in total world trade was very insignificant. The
share is particularly low in the world trade of fish, meat, chicken, vegetables
and fruits. India has made substantial strides in the total world production of
many commodities.
However, its share in the export market is relatively very small. The pertinent
questions of marketable surplus and export surplus are ailing the export
potentials of Indian agricultural products. Nevertheless, the country has made
phenomenal efforts in enhancing the agricultural exports.
24
According to AMIT SRIVASTAVA | Tue, 6 Dec 2016, DNA
APMC export complex at Vashi struggles to crack a deal
There are no takers for the export complex constructed by the Agriculture
Produce Market Committee (APMC), Mumbai, with traders claiming that the
price fixed by the administration .i.e. Rs 6.7 crore for each unit is not feasible.
Administration failed to attract even a single trader for the state-of-the-art
export complex at Vashi.
According to the traders, the APMC administration has quoted a high price for
each unit of the export complex, which is not feasible for them to buy. A total
of 12 units have been constructed, with each unit being of 6,500 sq metre
area in a ground-plus-three-storey building. Each unit has a separate elevator,
power supply sub station, cold storage and enough space for an office.
The APMC administration, however, maintained that the rate for each unit had
been decided based on ready reckoner rate of the area.
Traders alleged that APMC had been formed to facilitate trade of agricultural
produce, but it was acting as a trader. ―The APMC should work on no profit no
loss principle. Unfortunately, it has been working as a developer and has fixed
an exorbitant price for the export centre,‖ said Mangesh Patil, a mango
exporter.
According to sources, APMC has spent around Rs 5.54 crore on each unit of
the export complex. ―The administration wants to sell each unit by keeping a
profit margin, and that is why they fixed the price of each unit at Rs 6.7 crore,‖
said an administrative official, requesting anonymity.
The administration has failed to attract even a single trader in consecutive e-
tenders over the past seven months.
25
According to Ashok Valunj TNN | Dec 29, 2016, IST
Navi Mumbai: Vashi APMC traders incur 20 per cent losses
NAVI MUMBAI: Wholesale traders at the Vashi APMC market say they are
concerned over incurring 20 per cent losses in business on an average even
50 days after demonetisation.
As business in perishables goods such as vegetables and fruits is mainly
done through cash, experts say the market has failed to revive despite a good
harvest. The cap on cash withdrawal has been a major hurdle to both
wholesale and retail traders for payment to labourers.
"Farmers would rarely visit the APMC market from far-flung areas such as
Pune, Sangli, Satara, Nashik and Nagpur to collect their bills since we would
transfer their payment through RTGS. With a cap on withdrawal, they have
begun to approach us directly for cash but we are unable to pay them. They
don't understand a cashless system," said Ashok Valunj, a trader.
Despite a bumper production, supply has exceeded demand due to the cash
crunch, say traders. "Homemakers feel the pinch due to unavailability of lower
denomination notes, which has slowed down business. We definitely lose
business to limited cash flow," said RajendraGavai, a vegetable trader. Sanjay
Pansare, former APMC director and fruits trader, said, "Business is yet to
reach its pre-demonetisation level. We are bearing the brunt of almost 50%
losses in the fruit market."
According to By Faisal Tandel | Posted 11-Jul-2016
Mumbai: Pay more for vegetables as traders to go on 'mass leave'
Residents of Mumbai, Navi Mumbai and Thane, will have to spend more
money on vegetables, groceries, spices and fruits from tomorrow as about
5,000 traders from the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC) market
in Sanpada, Navi Mumbai, are going on ‗mass leave‘ in response to the state
government‘s amendments to the APMC Act.
26
Normally fruits, vegetables, onions, potatoes, spices and groceries are first
brought to the APMC market and sold to retailers and local markets. On July
5, the government came up with an amendment stating that the traders who
sell inside the market should pay the tax, pay the mathadikamgar, and also
commission to the APMC for the commodities. But a trader can also sell the
same product outside the APMC market and doesn‘t have to pay any such
charges.
According to Insights · published November 20, 2014 ·
updated November 20, 2014
APMC Act and Related Issues are: -
1. Government policies and interventions for development in various
sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation.
2. Welfare schemes, mechanisms, laws, institutions and bodies
constituted for the protection and betterment of these vulnerable
sections.
3. Issues related to direct and indirect subsidies and minimum support
prices; Public Distribution System.
Nageshwara et al (2009)
India is amongst top ten producers in the world for rice, buffalo milk, wheat,
cow milk, fresh vegetables, sugar cane, potatoes, groundnut, pepper mint and
buffalo meat. The technological developments, macro-economic reforms and
Uruguay Round Agreement have contributed to the changes in agricultural
trade. The progress of agriculture has made a lot of changes in the net trading
position of India.
27
Mathur, Das, and Sircar (2006)
The study identifies factors that affect agricultural growth and analyses
constrains that have affected its growth in the sector. There has been a
decline in growth rate of the agriculture sector during the 1990 till the recent
past. This is accompanied with recent decline in yields per hectare for a
number of food crops. There are vast inter-state differences in growth rate of
agriculture and even more so for food grains. The analysis at the all India
level for the period 1990-91 to 2003-04 suggests that government expenditure
in agriculture including public investment and subsidy for fertilizer usage and
electricity consumption for agriculture are the main factors affecting
agricultural production in India. At the same time, the state – wise analysis
from the panel regression result shows that the agricultural output at current
prices is significantly and positively dependent on government expenditure on
agriculture, fertilizer usage, rainfall and population.
2.2 Gaps Identified
According to the Literature Review, there is no study conducted on
various issues and challenges faced by the agriculture SMEs in Export Market
with Special Reference to Vashi APMC Market, NaviMumbai.
Also the expectation of exporters from APMC in the market driven
economy are missing.
28
CHAPTER– 3
Objectives, Scope and Research Methodology
3.1 Purpose of the Study
APMC have manifold role to play as a catalyst in promoting exports. It not
only constructs a platform for the exporters to redress their problems and
suggestions to the concerned authority but also penetrate new markets for
Indian products. Representations of APMC are well received by the
Diplomats, Governments in India and abroad. Having a wide global network,
APMC provide reciprocal trade promotion activities for the benefits of Indian
exporters.
The purpose of the study is to understand the role and activities of:
Department of Commerce, Government of India
To study and understand APMC Market role and activities to be
performed
3.2 Scope of the Study
1. The scope of the research study has been done by selecting 25 Export
Traders.
2. Exploratory and Qualitative Research has been carried out to
understand the services provided by the APMC.
3. An index of effectiveness and efficiency of the APMC has been
developed based on the ranking obtained under the various
parameters.
Feedback has been obtained through Questionnaire. Based on the feedback,
the index of effectiveness has been worked out.
29
3.3 Objectives of the Study
1. To understand the various issues & challenges faced by Export Market.
2. To understand the nature & the type of business.
3. To understand about the challenges faced by Businessman.
4. To understand the relevant schemes and about the various subsidies
needed to the Businessman.
5. To study the impact or GST on the small business.
3.4 Hypothesis
H01: Majority of exporters perceive that APMC are not performing the role of a
catalyst in promoting export.
H11: Majority of exporters perceive that APMC are performing the role of a
catalyst in promoting export.
H02: Majority of members perceive that APMC are not promoting the Brand
image of Indian Products abroad.
H12: Majority of members perceive that APMC are promoting the Brand
image of Indian Products abroad.
H03: Majority of the exporters perceive that setting up product focused SME by
the Government had no added advantage for the Exporters in increasing
exports.
H13: Majority of the exporters perceive that setting up product focused SME by
the Government had an added advantage to Exporters in increasing exports.
3.5 Research Methodology
a) Secondary Data Collection / Descriptive Survey
Detailed data of the activities including set up, role, services and facilities
offered by the APMC from libraries, annual reports, economic survey and
journals and other public domain avenues are gathered.
30
b) Primary Data Collection / Field Survey
The primary data has been collected by preparing one questionnaire and
group discussion as per the details below:
1. To evaluate the various services and facilities provided by the
Exporters of APMC Market, Vashi NaviMumbai.
2. Suggestions received were further filtered with qualitative research by
attending open house meets and one to one discussion with the
experts.
Research Instruments for Primary data collection are;
1. Direct mailing and handouts of above Questionnaires to the focused
groups.
2. Enablers – Members Directory of the APMC Market, Exporters, Office
of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises and other professional
networking forum.
The questionnaire comprised of questions pertaining to;
Brief profile and services provided by APMC Market, Vashi
NaviMumbai.
Brief profile of the exporter of APMC Market, Vashi NaviMumbai.
Evaluation of the following services of APMC Market, Vashi
NaviMumbai.
Export Support Services.
Facility & Infrastructure.
Administration and professional approach.
31
3.6 Sample Size
According to the knowledgeable source there are around 2000 exporters and
only 50 % of them are in regular export business, which includes Status
holders, multi-product merchant exporters and manufacturer exporters. Hence
from the population of 1000 active exporters sample sizes of 10% (i.e. 100
exporters) have been selected on random on APMC Market, Vashi
NaviMumbai basis covering all product groups. More than 60% of the sample
size was from SMEs the rationale behind selecting more SMEs in the sample
size was they contribute more than 50% to total exports.
Type of Sampling – Stratified Random Sampling
3.7 Statistical Analysis of Data
The responses observed from each item in the questionnaire were scored and
tabulated into a master sheet. Data was analysed and interpret with the help
of graph and pie charts.
3.8 Interpretation and Report Writing
The analyzed data were finally interpreted to draw the conclusions and
reported with the objective of the study in view.
3.9 Limitations of the Study
The research is confined to multi-product groups and markets; hence the
findings will be generic in nature.
3.10 Expected benefits of the findings of Research
APMC Market, Vashi NaviMumbai to upgrade their services and
improve their competitiveness.
Exporters will gain knowledge and information for better performance.
State Governments to prepare the export strategy for the State.
Ministry of Commerce to take corrective policy measures.
32
3.11 Probable outcomes of the study
The study will focus on how to enhance the various subsidies provided or
currently needed to them and on various schemes that are provided and
currently needed to them by conducting primary research using a coded
questionnaire targeted at APMC Market, Vashi NaviMumbai Businessman‘s to
get a view point. In addition, secondary research into innovative learning
approaches will help create a well-rounded recommendation of actions to be
taken in order to enhance various subsidies provided or currently needed to
them and on various schemes that are provided and currently needed to
them.
3.12 Usefulness of the study
The study will be of great use to Exporter of APMC Kirana Market Vashi
NaviMumbai. The following aspects will add value to relevant schemes and
about the various subsidies needed to the Businessman.
Focusing on the various Schemes provided to the Exporters of APMC
Market, Vashi NaviMumbai.
Focusing on the various Subsidies provided to the APMC Market,
Vashi NaviMumbai.
Focusing on the various Schemes needed to the Exporters of APMC
Market, Vashi NaviMumbai.
Focusing on the various Subsidies needed to the APMC Market, Vashi
NaviMumbai.
Provided dedicate pathway that enables exporters to increase their
business domestically and internationally.
The study is nutshell will enable all exporters to assimilate new approaches
and benefits to better resources utilization and higher success rates.
33
Chapter– 4
MUMBAI AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE:
An overview
The Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Mumbai was
established Under ―The Maharashtra Agricultural Procedure Marketing
(Development & Regulation) Act, 1963‖ on 15-January 1977.
Area of Regulation
Greater Mumbai
Thane Taluka
30 Villages UranTalika (Raigad)
Objectives of APMC
Regulation of marketing of agricultural commodities.
Establishment, maintenance and management of markets.
To protect the interest of farmers.
Dissemination of market related information in respect of production,
storage, transportation, inflow & average rates and movement of
notified Agricultural commodities etc.
CONSTITUTION OF BOARD
12 Elected Agriculturists Members from 6 Regions-
5 Elected Members of Traders
1 Elected Member of Mathadi/Mapadi
5 Government Nominated Members consists of (SC-1, OBC 1, LADIES
2, ST 1)
2 Nominated Members of Mumbai &Navi Mumbai Municipal
Corporations
1 MMRDA
1 Director of Marketing
26 Total Board Members
34
Area of Market Yards
As per CIDCO project land Reserved for MAPMC: 122 Hect
Land handed over to MAPMC by CIDCO on long lease till Date: 70.15
Hect
Land Purchased by MAPMC from other than CIDCO : 2.55 Hect
Land handed over to MAPMC by CIDCO for recreation: 1.62 Hect
Shifting of Wholesale Trade to APMC Complex VASHI
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
No. Of wholesale Market Yards 7
No. Of galas/shop-cum-godowns 3793
No. Of Auction halls 3
No. Of warehouses 1
No. Of central facility Bldgs. 4
No. Of VyaparBhavan Bldgs. 1
No. Of Exporters Bldgs. 2
No. Of Commercial offices 1369
No. Of Canteens 51
Ripening Chamber for fruits 1
Common toilets 48
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
35
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
36
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
37
Comparative Statement of Market-wise income of Market fee
(Rs. In Lacs)
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
6564.54 7453.44 8471.89 6574.62 6511.21
Narration: - (Rs. In Lacs)
The graphical representation of the table shows that in 2011-12 income of
Market fee is 6564.54, in 2012-13 income of Market fee is 7453.44, in 2013-
14 income of Market fee is 8471.89, in 2014-15 income of Market fee is
6574.62, and in remaining 2015-16 income of Market fee is 6511.21.
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Year Wise Income of Market Fee (Rs. Lakhs)
38
Statement of supervision cost recovered and paid by MAPMC to
state Government of Maharashtra.
(Rs. In Lacs)
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
421.63 479.47 560.52 427.61 423.50
Narration: - (Rs. In Lacs)
The graphical representation of the table shows that supervision cost
recovered and paid by MAPMC to state Government of Maharashtra in 2011-
12is 421.63, supervision cost recovered and paid by MAPMC to state
Government of Maharashtra in 2012-13 is 479.47, supervision cost recovered
and paid by MAPMC to state Government of Maharashtra in 2013-14 is
560.52, supervision cost recovered and paid by MAPMC to state Government
of Maharashtra in 2014-15 is 427.61, and in remaining supervision cost
recovered and paid by MAPMC to state Government of Maharashtra in 2015-
16 is 423.50.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Supervision Cost Paid
39
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
40
Narration: - INCOME 2015-16 (Rs. In Lacs)
The graphical representation of the table shows that Market fee supervision
cost recovered and paid by MAPMC to state Government of Maharashtra is
64%, Lease premium supervision cost recovered and paid by MAPMC to
state Government of Maharashtra is 4%, Service Charges supervision cost
recovered and paid by MAPMC to state Government of Maharashtra is 1%,
License Fee supervision cost recovered and paid by MAPMC to state
Government of Maharashtra is 0%, Interest on investment supervision cost
recovered and paid by MAPMC to state Government of Maharashtra is 20%,
Vehicle entry fee supervision cost recovered and paid by MAPMC to state
Government of Maharashtra is 2%, Income from property supervision cost
recovered and paid by MAPMC to state Government of Maharashtra is 3%,
and in remaining Other Income supervision cost recovered and paid by
MAPMC to state Government of Maharashtra is 6%.
INCOME 2015-16
Market fee
Lease premium
Service charges
License fee
Interest on investment
41
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
Narration: - EXPENDITURE 2015-16(Rs. In Lacs)
The graphical representation of the table shows that Market Expenditure supervision
cost recovered and paid by MAPMC to state Government of Maharashtra is 0%,
Establishment Expenditure supervision cost recovered and paid by MAPMC to state
Government of Maharashtra is 49%, Administrative Expenditure supervision cost
recovered and paid by MAPMC to state Government of Maharashtra is 5%, Tax
Interest Contribution supervision cost recovered and paid by MAPMC to state
Government of Maharashtra is 4%, Market Yard Expenses supervision cost
recovered and paid by MAPMC to state Government of Maharashtra is 22%, and in
remaining Depreciation supervision cost recovered and paid by MAPMC to state
Government of Maharashtra is 20%.
Expenditure 2015-16
MEETING EXPENDITURE
ESTABLISHMENT EXPENDITURE
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE
TAX, INTEREST CONTRIBUTIONS
42
India‘s biggest reform to transform the life of a crisis-ridden farmer is 91.6 per
cent behind schedule this year, prompting Prime Minister Narendra Modi to
promise in five months what could not be done over the last 10. As many as
250 agricultural markets nationwide (of 585 selected) were supposed to have
been linked by 2015-16 to a common nationwide electronic platform, but only
21 markets in eight states have been linked - as of March 2016 - to what is
called the National Agricultural Market (NAM) platform. On average, a farmer
gets no more than 10 to 30 per cent of the cost you pay for his produce, as
India Spend has reported, primarily because the farmer cannot sell directly to
consumers and large companies, thanks to an archaic law that delivers
commissions to layers of agents, usually linked to politicians. Despite the slow
progress, the target of linking 585 markets to the NAM by 2018 stays
unchanged, according to this statement issued on April 14, 2016, by the
Ministry of Agriculture. This means that 564 markets must be linked in two
years, 26 times the number (21) linked over the last 10 months. Last week
Prime Minister Narendra Modi promised to link 200 markets over the next five
months.
The NAM platform will allow anyone from any part of India to buy agricultural
produce from any farmer from any part of the country.
Source: Economic Survey of India, 2015-16 Source: Agriculture Ministry, 2015-16
43
The Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) Act of a state
regulates the purchase of agricultural products, such as cereals, pulses, fruits
and vegetables for that region. It hobbles farmers, imposing multiple levies on
produce and disallows direct sales to private companies.―The continued
presence of regulations of APMC Acts in most commodities in most states
has compelled the farmer to sell produce only in the government-controlled
marketing yards,‖ said this December 2015 NITI Aayog report, Raising
Agricultural Productivity and Making Farming Remunerative for Farmers.―The
APMC market yards are subject to vast technical as well as marketing
inefficiencies that undermine the prices that farmers receive.‖Bihar is the only
state to have repealed the APMC Act in 2006. Kerala never enacted APMC
legislation, but it did not develop marketing infrastructure either.―APMCs levy
multiple fees, of substantial magnitude, that are non-transparent and hence a
source of political power,‖ said the Economic Survey of 2015-16 (Volume 1,
Chapter 8).
For instance, at the principal market yard for Mumbai city (at Vashi), farmers
must pay 2% commission to agents, who charge further commissions that
range from 6.5% (on onions) to 10% (on vegetables), the survey said.The
southern state of Karnataka has pioneered modern agriculture marketing by
unifying 51 of 155 principal markets state wide in collaboration with the
National Commodity Exchange, a trading platform for commodities.
APMC – The concept
An agricultural produce market committee (APMC) is a marketing board
established by a state government in India. There are 294 APMCs in the State
and function as per the Maharashtra Agriculture Produce Marketing
(Development and Regulation) Act 1963 and Maharashtra Agriculture
Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rule 1967.
44
• Objectives:
1. Ensuring that farmers are not exploited by intermediaries (and money
lenders) who compel farmers to sell their produce at the farm gate for
an extremely low price.
2. Providing a fair mechanism where all food produce should first be
brought to a market yard and then sold through auction.
• Mechanism & its Features:
1. Each state which operates APMC markets geographically divide the
state and markets (mandis) are established at different places within
the state. Farmers are required to sell their produce via auction only at
the mandi in their region.
2. Traders require a license to operate within a mandi. Wholesale and
retail traders (e.g. shopping mall owners or mom-pop retailers etc) and
food processing companies cannot buy produce directly from a farmer.
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
45
Objectives / Suggested improvements to avoid shortcomings in current
APMC system
1. Provide remunerative price to farmers and to reduce uncertainties in
production & consumption of farming products.
2. Ensuring that end consumers are charged fair price even while
producers get fair compensation and strengthening efficiency of supply chain
network from producer to consumer via APMC.
3. Strategically change the middle man centric present system to farmer
& consumer centric system.
4. Use of efficient information system with a robust IT backbone to
achieve Supply chain improvements using effective distribution and stabilizing
demand by using efficient cold storage facilities.
5. MSP (minimum support price) effective usage for normalizing and
balancing demand-supply.
6. Include ‗facilitating organization of farmers markets‘ under the
permitted list of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities under
Companies Act 2013, to encourage companies engaged in agri-allied
activities, food processing etc. to take up this activity under CSR and also
help in setting up supply chain infrastructure. This would be similar to the e-
Choupal initiative of ITC Ltd., but under CSR.
7. We have included a comparative study of APMC model followed by the
neighbouring Karnataka state as of the one prevalent in Maharashtra in Vashi.
Major improvements are drawn from such a comparison. In the next phase of
our study, the systems followed by other state governments in Tamilnaidu in
terms of establishing Cold storage facilities, also. This will help us understand
the salient features in normalizing availability of agri-commodities, throughout
the year.
46
Case Study- Mumbai Vashi APMC
Introduction:
1. The APMC (Agricultural Produce Market Committee) Vashi market, one of
the largest markets in India is in and around Sector 19 of Vashi. There are a
staggering 3700 godowns, 1500 commercial blocks, 4 large auction halls, 2
giant warehouses, and 5 large wholesale market yards. Apart from this, there
are big processing centers - a vapour heat treatment plant, ripening facilities,
cold storage facilities, an export facilitation center and so on.
3. Every day, nearly 1,800 tonnes of vegetables — enough to provide 90
grams to each of the 2.02 crore residents of Mumbai, Thane and Navi
Mumbai — roll into the yard from vegetable producing areas like Nashik,
Pune, Satara, Sangli and other parts of Maharashtra as well as from outside
the state.
5. The produce is sold by auction and the prices are noted and managed
by the APMC. It is the committee's responsibility to ensure that sales do not
take place below the minimum price fixed by the government. They are also
responsible for ensuring fair measurement and weighing, and fair charges for
labour.
5. As per rules, the farmer has to pay APMC a sum ranging from 0.2 % to 2
% as fee for facilitating the sale of his produce. After separation, the stock is
then sold with the help of commission agents, who charge anywhere between
eight to 15 per cent from the farmer for helping him sell his produce, as
against the allowed two to eight per cent.
6. The wholesalers who buy the produce then ferry the produce to the
retailer who then sells it to consumers. Along the chain, the farmer seems to
come off as the worst affected. By the time the produce reaches the
consumer, the price is inflated by almost 60 per cent and the middle men at
various stages take the cut.
47
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
48
Karnataka APMC Model Salient Feature
Karnataka government had taken a major issue in the agricultural
marketing sector by establishing Rashtriya e- Market Services Limited
(ReMS), a joint venture of Karnataka Government and NCDEX Spot
Exchange Limited and has emphasized the importance of Leveraging
technology in agriculture marketing system.
The ReMS claims to offer complete technology and management solution
for modernizing markets in state & operating the markets at par with
international practices.
The iAgriMarC™ APMC Management Software Suite is aimed at
automating the entire Gate-to-Gate operations as well as Check-post
management and outside-mandi purchases of APMC Mandi's. The base
product is modeled as per the Agriculture Produce Markets Law, 1961
passed by the Central Government of India.
The unified market has integrated some 51 markets so far and aims at
covering all the 155 main market yards as well as 354 sub-yards of
Karnataka state.
From the day of launch (February 22, 2014), 7.5 lakh lots of trading has
been done on the platform with 45 lakhs bids being made with total
transaction on platform of worth Rs. 15000 crore.
It has accommodated lakhs of farmers,31473traders & 17149 commission
agents for all the 92 regulated commodities.
49
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
Analysis of Proposed supply chain at APMC – Vashi Lets consider for
our analysis Tomato Introduction:
1. Total area under Tomato Cultivation in Maharashtra is 35000 Ha.
2. Tomato Growing Districts in Maharashtra are Nashik, Pune, Nagpur,
and Ahmednagar.
3. Mainly tomato is Rabbi Crop but in Maharashtra it also comes in Kharif
crop category at some locations.
4. We selected Pimpalgaon village in Nashik District which is roughly 200
km far from APMC- Vashi Market.
5. Out of 50 farmers in village 20 farmers decided to do Tomato farming
from mid of June to September ending & next three months i.e. October,
November & December are harvesting period.
50
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
51
Chapter – 5
MUMBAI STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD:
An overview
MSAMB Profile
The Maharashtra State Agricultural Marketing
Board (MSAMB), Pune was established on 23rd,
March 1984, under section 39A of Maharashtra
Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development &
Regulation) Act, 1963. MSAMB has done
pioneering work in the field of Agricultural
Marketing in the State and achieved success in
various areas. MSAMB is having an important
role in developing and coordinating agricultural
marketing system in the State of Maharashtra.
Agriculture Produce Market Committee
REGULATION
Agriculture produce means all produce (whether processed or not) of
agriculture, horticulture, animal husbandry, pisciculture and forests as
specified in the schedule.
The APMCs were established by the State Govt. for regulating the marketing
of different kinds of agriculture and pisciculture produce for the same market
area or any part thereof.
The Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation)
Act was passed in the year 1963, with a view to regulate the marketing of
agricultural and pisciculture produce in market areas.
52
Constitution: Every market shall consist of:
Agriculturists residing in the market area and being 21 years of age on the
date specified from time to time by the Collector in this behalf.
Traders and commission agents holding license to operate in the market
area.
Chairman of the co-operative society doing business of processing and
marketing of agriculture produce in the market area.
Chairman of the Panchayat Samiti within the jurisdiction in which the market
area is situated, President or Sarpanch of the local authority within the
jurisdiction of which the principal market is situated.Deputy Registrar of Co-
operative Society of the district, the Assistant Cotton Extn. Officer or where
there is no such officer the district Agriculture Officer of the Department of
Agriculture.
Objectives:
It shall be the duty of the Market Committee to implement the provisions of the
Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act 1963, the rules
and bye-laws made there under in the market area to provide such facilities
for marketing of agricultural produce therein as the Director may from time to
time, direct do such other acts as may be required in relation to the
superintendence, direction and control of markets or for relating marketing of
agricultural produce in any place in the market area and for purpose
connected with the matters aforesaid, and for that purpose may exercise such
powers and perform such duties and discharge such functions as may be
provided by or under this Act.
The Act provides for establishment of Market Committees in the State. These
Market Committees are engaged in development of market yards for the
benefit of agriculturists and the buyers. Various agricultural produce
commodities are regulated under the Act. At present there are 305 APMCs
with main markets and 603 sub markets.
53
Division wise break-up of APMCs are as follows:
Source: https://www.msamb.com/apmc/default.htm
Classification of APMCs (2015-2016)
Source: https://www.msamb.com/apmc/default.htm
BUDGET:
As per provision of section 38 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce
Marketing (Regulation) Act 1963, and the Maharashtra Agriculture Produce
Marketing (Development & Regulation) rule 1967-rule 112 (1) every Market
Committee shall submit their budget to the Marketing Board for sanction
before 31st January of every year.
The State Marketing Board after due scrutiny, sanctions the budget with or
without modifications within one month from the date of receipt thereof. It
includes the original budget, supplementary and reappropriation budget.
54
The budget is prepared in the prescribed format developed by the State
Marketing Board. The budget includes all the items of revenue and
expenditure (including administrative expenditure, and development
items).The Marketing Board has delegated powers to its following officers to
sanction the budget.
Budget of APMC
Source: https://www.msamb.com/apmc/budget.htm
LOAN TO APMC
Source: https://www.msamb.com/apmc/loan.htm
55
As a supplement to the finance of APMC, the Maharashtra State Agricultural
Marketing Board gives some amount as loan to enable APMCs to undertake
developmental programmes. However, MSAMB insists on availing loans
from Banks by the APMCs for their development programmes. The
development works include land, drinking water facility, compound wall,
gate, internal roads, electrification, auction halls and platform, godowns,
computers, weigh bridges, farmers hostel, hamal bhavan, trader's and
commission agent's shops, etc. The loans are sanctioned as per the norms
prescribed by MSAMB.
APMCs submit the loan applications with details, which are being processed
at the head office. As per the rules of the Marketing Board, the rate of
interest for development works except construction of shopping complex,
are as follows:
The APMC has to submit a loan proposal along with the following
documents: Loan application in the prescribed form, Loan repayment
agreement, Loan hypothecation agreement & APMC Director Body‘s
Indemnity Bond, Sanction from competent authority for building plan &
layout, and Approval under section 12(1).
The repayment period of loan provided for the following development works
is as follows:
Source: https://www.msamb.com/apmc/loan.htm
56
During last 25 years (i.e. from 1985 to March 2014), the Marketing Board
has disbursed an loan amount of Rs 164.48 Crore to 236 APMCs in the
State, out of which, the outstanding amount as on 31st March 2014, is Rs.
51.08 Crore.
CONTRIBUTION
As per provision of section 37 (2) of the Act, every market committee has to
pay an annual contribution to the Marketing Board, on the basis of their
income. The Govt. of Maharashtra wide notification no.
APM\1085\6568\621\11-c Dated - 04/04/1988 has specified the following
rates of contribution.
Contribution of APMC
Source: https://www.msamb.com/apmc/contribution.htm
As per the provision of section 37(2) of the Act, every APMC shall, out of
market fund, pay within two months, from the date of expiry of previous
year, to the Marketing Board the annual contribution as fixed by the Govt. as
per the above notification.
During 2013-14 as per income out of 305 APMCs, contribution of 275
APMCs was fixed to Rs.34.18 crores.
57
EXPORT PROMOTION
MSAMB has the program to promote exports of fresh fruits, vegetables &
flowers from Maharashtra to the various countries of world with the help of
farmers & their organizations. The main products handled are grapes,
mangoes, pomegranate, mandarin, banana, rice, mango pulp, cashew nut,
cut flowers (from polyhouse) etc.
Regular guidance to the farmers and their cooperative societies is given in
terms of pre-harvest, post-harvest, packaging, pre-cooling, cold storage and
transportation. To boost the exports, MSAMB also provides infrastructure
facilities viz. Air Cargo handling at Pune and Vapour Heat Treatment at
Vashi, Navi Mumbai. MSAMB also establish a modern packhouse including
pre-cooling, cold storage and Ripening chamber facility for Alphanso
Mangoes at Jamsande, Tal-Devgad (Sindhudurg), Ratnagiri and at Jalana
for Kesar Mangoes while a modern onion export facility was created at
Indapur (Dist-Pune) with the help of APEDA, New Delhi. These facilities can
be useful for farmers/growers and expoters in the state. Trial exports are
being conducted for certain commodities by the MSAMB with the help of
APEDA, New Delhi.
Following products can be made available from the farmers' co-operative
societies for export as well as for domestic marketing.
Source: https://www.msamb.com/export/pramotion/default.htm
58
ACHIEVEMENTS
MSAMB is a state level organization working in the field of export of various
fresh fruits, vegetable & processed food products since last twenty five years.
We have experience of export of fruits & vegetable to Europe, USA, South
East Asian Countries, Japan, and Middle East Countries etc. Export can
provide better option for the marketing of the agro commodities & provides
the alternative way of utilization of surplus production.
Some of the remarkable achievements can be enlisted as under:
Commercial & trial export
Implementation of subsidy scheme for GlobalGAP certification.
Erection and successful utilization of Export Facility Centres for various
commodities in the state.
Participation in various International Commodity Specific Promotion
Programs.
Successful implementation of Agri Export Zones of Alphonso Mango,
Kesar mango, Onion, Pomegranate, Banana & Mandarins.
Nodal Agency for implementation of Asian Development Bank & IFAD
funded projects in Maharashtra.
Successfully organized Farmers‘ Foreign Study Tour to Israel &
Europe.
Mango Export:
Mango, called the king of fruits in India, accounts for 40 percent of the
national fruit production of 22.168 million MTs a year. The main strength of
the Maharashtra state lies in the cultivation of the popular exportable varieties
e.g. Alphonso, Banganpalli, Kesar, etc., with substantial production and
significant share in mango export. Alphonso & Kesar are the major
commercially varieties grown in Maharashtra. MSAMB has leading role in
export of mangoes to various countries across the globe.
59
MSAMB has conducted the trials for exporting mangoes by CA containers to
far distant markets with the help of APEDA, New Delhi and exported two
containers of Alphonso and Kesar mangoes to UK and one container to
Singapore in the year 1998. One more CA container of Kesar was exported
successfully in the year 2000. MSAMB has exported Kesar mangoes to
Hongkong, which is further exported to china. This is new opportunity to
Kesar mango growers in the form of new market. After long & continuous
efforts, the Japanese market opened for Indian mangoes in June, 2006. A
small quantity was exported in that year after processing of mangoes in
MSAMB‘s Vapor Heat treatment (VHT) Machine. Later on lot many exporters
registered with MSAMB for use of VHT machine for export of their mangoes
to Japan and around 26 Mts of mangoes were processed and exported to
Japan. In the mango season around 13+ MTs of mangoes were processed in
MSAMB‘s VHT facility centre and exported to Japan. MSAMB has exported 8
consignments to Japan in the mango season 2008. USA is the bigger and
reliable market for Indian mangoes. After 18 years of span, Indian mangoes
were allowed in USA market in the month of May 2007. MSAMB exported 13
consignments to USA in the mango season 2008 through various ports like
Newyork, Atlanta, Sanfrascisco etc. MSAMB has promoted the partnership
organization of primary co-operative societies named ―Maha mango‖ for
export promotion of mangoes.
Grape Exports:
The MSAMB promoted an organisation called MAHAGRAPES to boost the
export of grapes. MAHAGRAPES is regularly exporting around 100-120
containers to Europe and Middle East. They could establish their brand in the
European markets.
MSAMB also helped farmers co-operative societies to establish their own
pre-cooling and cold storage units, by providing them technology and
guidance. From the year 2003 the Packhouses which are being used for
Grape export are recognised by APEDA.
60
Pomegranate Exports:
Pomegranate is another important fruit grown in Maharashtra. Its usage and
medicinal properties made this fruit mote important and gradually increasing
demand in the international markets like Europe & USA.
MSAMB has taken a lead and successfully exported the pomegranate
containers to UAE. Initally the demand was only in Gulf countries, however
MSAMB realized the need of the export oriented infrastructure for
pomegranate and with the help of APEDA, MSAMB has established the
export facility centers for pomegranate at BaramatiDist: Pune and at
IndapurDist: Pune and being utilized these centers by private exporters and
around 1500+MTs of pomegranate have been exported majorly to European
countries in the period of 8 months.
Mandarin Exports:
The Nagpur mandarin is a loose Jacket orange and to ensure that it reaches
distant markets with least post-harvest losses during shipping, it must be
devoid of pre-harvest infection by fungal organisms and skin attachments
must be tight for prolonged shelf life. The Nagpur mandarin has unique
features easily separable skin and segments from each other, comparatively
low seed content and low acids. An export of mandarins from India is not a
common phenomenon. In the history for the first time one trial container of
Nagpur Mandarins was sent to UAE in the year 2002, and it reached in very
good condition.
MSAMB has exported one container of Nagpur mandarins to Holland in the
year 2005 and achieved good results. To have export worthy quality, MSAMB
has taken initiatives and establishing export oriented infrastructure in
mandarin producing belt.
61
Banana Exports:
In spite of the huge production of banana in the state of Maharashtra, the
export is negligible. MSAMB is the pioneer of export of banana from
Maharashtra state. For the first time One 40‖ container was exported in the
year 2002 to UAE and the results are very encouraging. MSAMB has
exported the banana 16 MT in Feb'2005 to Dubai through 40' Refer container
from Mahabanana, Jalgaon. But still there is need of improvement in pre
harvest-post harvest management practices in banana. For the same
MSAMB is working by setting up of export facility centers in the banana
growing area. MSAMB has taken initiatives and setting up of export facility
centers for Banana at Raver, Dist. Jalgaon and Basmatnagar, Dist. Hingoli
which includes mechanical handling system, pre-cooling, cold storage and
ripening chamber.
Lemon and Sweetlime Export:
MSAMB has exported Lemons and Sweet Lime through mix container to
Dubai. Through this trial export we realized that there is a better scope of
export of Lemon and Sweetlime in Gulf countries.
Flower Export:
MSAMB is exporting Gerbera and Carnation flowers through 5 air
consignments to Singapore. This export is the lighthouse for export of flowers
from Maharashtra. There is much more scope for Roses, Gerbera and
Carnation flowers from Maharashtra.
62
International Commodity Specific Promotion Programs:
MSAMB always focus on promotion of various agricultural commodities
grown in the state, domestically and internationally. MSAMB used to
participate in the export promotional activities worldwide. Considering this
concept, MSAMB has participated in various international exhibitions which
can be listed as under:
1. Mango Promotion Program, Germany
2. AnugaFoodtech, Germany
3. Mango Promotion Program, London
4. Mango Promotion Program, China
5. Mango Promotion Program, Japan
Similarly MSAMB has sent the delegation to various countries to study the
modern agricultural production systems, post harvest technologies, potential
markets etc. This can be enlisted as under:
1. Visit to The Netherlands (Flower Market)
2. Visit to Australia & New Zealand
3. Visit to Singapore, Malaysia &Hongkong
4. Visit to South Africa
63
A. Facilities underutilization:
B.
MANGO EXPORT FACILITY CENTER AT NACHNE TAL & DIST:
RATNAGIRI :
Address and Contact Number:
MSAMB‘s Mango Export Facility Center,
Shantinagar, Nachane Road, Tal. & Dist. Ratnagiri
Telefax: 02352-228377
Contact Person: Mr.Milind Joshi (Cell No: 9422392238)
64
Source: https://www.msamb.com/export/facilities.htm
APEDA & USDA-APHIS approved pack house.
MANGO EXPORT FACILITY CENTER AT JAMSANDE TAL: DEOGAD
DIST: SINDHUDURG
Address and Contact Number:
MSAMB‘s Mango Export Facility Center,
A/P. Jamsande,
Tal. Devgad, Dist. Sindhudurg
Tel: 02352-228377
Fax: 02352-228165
Contact Person: Mr.Milind Joshi (Cell No: 9422392238)
Source: https://www.msamb.com/export/facilities.htm
APEDA & USDA-APHIS approved packhouse.
KESAR MANGO EXPORT FACILITY CENTRE, JALNA, DIST – JALNA
Address and Contact Number:
MSAMB‘s Mango Export Facility Center,
APMC Area,
Jalana, Dist. Jalana
Tel: 02482-242636 /0240-2334168
65
Source: https://www.msamb.com/export/facilities.htm
APEDA & USDA-APHIS approved packhouse.
VAPOUR HEAT TREATMENT (VHT) FACILITY
MSAMB‘s Vapour Heat Treatment Facility Centre
NiryatBhavan,
Vegetable Market, APMC Premises,
Sector 19,
Vashi, Navi Mumbai
Tel: 022-27840211
Fax: 022-27840837 (C/o.)
Contact Person: Mr.MangeshKadam (9969407030);Mr.Abhimanyu Mane
(9869993017)
Golden Opportunity For Exporters of Fruits & Vegetables
MSAMB with the help of APEDA has set up temperate control pack house
along with packing line, pre cooling and cold storage at Vashi, Navi Mumbai
for the exporters. The exporter can use this facility for different fruits and
vegetables in the mechanized pack house and enhance the shelf life of the
products.
66
Facility includes packing line which is mainly
useful for round fruits. The products get
automatically washed, dried, graded without
touching.
The processed products then can be pre cooled
with ultra-modern facility at reasonable rates.
The temperate can be maintained in between
1°C to 15 °C along with humidity.
The product then can be stored in the cold
storage for maintaining the cold chain. The
container can be stuffed at this facility.
Besides this, Vapour Heat Treatment facility has
been set up with the help of APEDA, New Delhi.
The machine has been imported from Japan. To
export different fruits & vegetables to Japan, it is
mandatory to treat the fruits & vegetables
through this facility. After treatment, produce can
be exported to Japan.
VHT is an effective, non-chemical method of
treatment to get rid of the oriental fruit fly problem
in fruits and vegetables. In VHT the produce is
held at a pre-determined temperature for a fixed
time (using a hot water - steam vapour system)
so as to destroy all the stages of fruit fly.
Mangoes, Melon, Papaya, Guava and various
vegetables are treated in VHT. The MSAMB and
APEDA have jointly set up the first semi-
commercial VHT facility at APMC Mumbai, Vashi,
Navi Mumbai. The VHT facility is set up as a
common service facility and an R & D tool. The
VHT is useful in controlling oriental fruit fly in
fresh fruits & vegetables, especially the Alphonso
and Kesar variety of mango for export.
VHT is a mandatory requirement while exporting to Japan.
The VHT machine is procured from M/s Sanshu Sangyo Co. Ltd., Japan by APEDA. The trial runs
carried out jointly by experts from APEDA and MSAMB have been successful. This VHT machine is
being utilised commercially since June 2006. The private exporters are using this machine for
processing of their mangoes for export to Japan. In the year 2006, only a few quantity was exported.
In the year 2007 around 26+ MT of mangoes were processed. In year 2008 around 13+ MT
mangoes were processed & exported to Japan.
67
APEDA & Dept. of Plant Quarantine, Govt. of Japan approved packhouse.
POMEGRANATE EXPORT FACILITY CENTRE, JALOCHI, (BARAMATI)
DIST – PUNE
Address and Contact Number:
MSAMB‘s Pomegranate Export Facility Center,
A/P. Jalochi,
Tal. Baramati, Dist. Pune
Tel: 02112-209718
Contact Person: Mr. Ajay Kudale (9422234653)
Source: https://www.msamb.com/export/facilities.htm
FRUIT & VEGETABLE EXPORT FACILITY CENTRE, INDAPUR, DIST –
PUNE
Address and Contact Number:
MSAMB‘s Fruit & Vegetable Export Facility Center,
Shivleela Nagar, IndapurAkluj Rd.,
Indapur, Dist. Pune-413106
Contact Person: Mr. Ajay Kudale (9422234653)
68
Source: https://www.msamb.com/export/facilities.htm
BANANA EXPORT FACILITY CENTRE AT BASAMAT DIST: HINGOLI
Source: https://www.msamb.com/export/facilities.htm
BANANA EXPORT FACILITY CENTRE AT SAVADA TAL: RAVER DIST:
JALGAON
Source: https://www.msamb.com/export/facilities.htm
69
B. Facilities under erection:
KESAR MANGO & POMEGRANATE EXPORT FACILITY CENTER,
LATUR
Source: https://www.msamb.com/export/facilities.htm
VAPOUR HEAT TREATMENT FACILITY CENTRE, NAVI MUMBAI
Source: https://www.msamb.com/export/facilities.htm
ONION EXPORT FACILITY CENTER, KALWAN, DIST. NASIK
Source: https://www.msamb.com/export/facilities.htm
70
GLOBALGAP CERTIFICATION FOR GOOD AGRICULTURAL
PRACTICES:
Introduction:
Due to global expansion in food trade, the World Trade Organization (WTO)
has set as one of their objectives the opening up of trade between countries
and aims to address restrictive trade barriers. Sanitary and phyto-sanitary
(SPS) issues have always been important in global trade and have become
one of the most important potential Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT). Pests
or pathogens may exist in one country but not in another, thus ultimately
resulting in restrictive TBT. In addition, food safety has become one of the
most important minimum requirements for future trade with developed
countries. The rapid increase in newly reported cases of outbreaks of food-
borne diseases particularly associated with fresh produce has been the
primary drive towards establishing minimum food safety standards. To be
part of global trade in fresh produce and food related products it will in future
require compliance to some kind of food safety assurance system. The
global drive towards ensuring safe food supplies must also be seen as part
of the focus on food security. Safe food must be ensured in both developed
and developing countries and appropriate legislation needs to be put in
place to address these concerns. The global emphasis on safe and secure
food supplies must also be seen against a backdrop of an increasing
number of immuno-compromises people (i.e. HIV / AIDS) as well as
increased outbreaks of diseases such as cholera and typhoid, particularly in
developing countries, which are often causes by inadequate sanitary
measures and contaminated drinking water. With respect to developed
countries such as the European Union, the importance of food safety was
emphasized by the recent outbreaks of BSE (Mad Cow disease) and Food
and Mouth disease as well as traditional concerns with environmental
pollution, particularly pesticides and the issues surrounding Genetically
Modified Organisms (GMO). In contrast to this, the main focus of concern in
the United States of America is the reported outbreaks of food borne
diseases often associated with the consumption of fresh or processes food.
71
In this scenario the importance of microbial contamination is of major
concern and has been the driving force behind the establishment of the USA
Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) policies and surveillance systems.
Currently, there are numerous systems that growers can adopt to ensure
safe food production, which include amongst others Good Agricultural
Practices (GAP), Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), Hazard Analysis
Critical Control Points (HACCP), Good Hygiene Practices etc.
One of the GAP systems that have taken off within the European community
is GLOBALGAP. Apart from Germany and France, most other countries
within the EU support this system, as do the major retailers, which consider
it the minimum standard for food trade. It is important to note that these
global standards will hopefully be harmonized but for the time being, major
retailers will still have their own set of requirements that growers will have to
adhere to.
EUREPGAP CERTIFICATION
GLOBALGAP started as a retailer initiative in 1997 with major inputs and
support from the chemical companies.
GLOBALGAP was established by the Euro-Retailer Produce Working
Group (EUREP) with the aim of setting standard and procedures for the
development of GAP.
Objectives of EUREPGAP
The main objective of GLOBALGAP is, to lead the system to an EN 45011-
based accredited certification system, referring to the cope of "GLOBALGAP
Fruits and Vegetables".
Partners from the entire food chain for fruit and vegetable production have
agreed upon the GLOBALGAP certification document and procedures,
which were achieved after extensive consultation over a three-year period.
72
Benefits–
Certification to GLOBALGAP will become mandatory as from March 2003
for farms growing produce for export to Europe, although the EC may allow
some latitude in this regard. At this point in time different certification
systems could be required for export to other countries such as the USA,
and Australia. As Europe is our largest export destination, GLOBALGAP
certification will in all likelihood become a minimum requirement for entry
into the EU market. However, it should be kept in mind that additional
retailer requirements will still have to be met.
Discussions are already underway to ensure harmonization between the
different food safety schemes and benchmarking will be essential to link the
various systems. While certification to GLOBALGAP will result in additional
costs to growers, there will be numerous benefits. Long-term benefits
include more motivated farm workers due to improved facilities, training and
better working conditions with a subsequent increase in living standards.
This would obviously also result in better productivity and outputs to the
ultimate benefit for the grower.
Other benefits include –
More environmentally sound farming practices,More judicious use of
chemicals and;Most importantly a cost benefit to the grower due to better
management practices enforced by the standard.It is important to note that
GLOBALGAP only covers produce up to the farm gate and thereafter other
systems such as GMP, HACCP etc. will become essential. All food
industries must also implement GMP and GHP, both of which are
prerequisite programs for HACCP. The South African fish industry,
represent a classical case study in terms of its adoption of HACCP.
73
List of GLOBALGA certification agencies in India –
GLOBALGAP has recognised this need and intends to provide input from the experiences
gained in other sectors to draw similar draft documents. Approved Certification Bodies :-
Source: https://www.msamb.com/export/globalgap.htm
74
KESAR MANGO – GLOBALGAP Certificates received under Primary
Marketing Organization (PMO) – 10
Source: https://www.msamb.com/export/globalgap_certificate.htm
75
AGRI EXPORT ZONE
- Jaggery
With the objective of promoting greater exports of fresh and processed
agricultural produce from the country the Government of India (GoI) has
announced the creation of Agri Export Zone (AEZ). The scheme is
implemented by the Ministry of Commerce, GoI, through APEDA (the
Agriculture and Processed Food Export Development Authority), New Delhi
– the nodal agency for AEZ. The AEZ is expected to give a focus and
direction for exports of key agricultural produce with potential from the
country. It involves a detailed action plan for the development of a specified
geographic area /s for effecting systematically greater exports of a specific
produce.
Under the AEZ all aspects of agriculture such as production, research,
development, extension, post-harvest management and marketing are
addressed in a focused manner for successful implementation. For instance
modern production practices are introduced for production of exportable
quality produce and improved productivity. There is an emphasis on setting
up of appropriate produce-specific post-harvest infrastructure and introduce
post-harvest practices, right from farm all the way to market. Another
important area of focus under AEZ is marketing, market promotion and
market development for Indian produce.
The need for market oriented research, development and extension
activities have been recognized under the AEZ and appropriate activities
proposed to achieve both near term and long term goals of the Indian export
industry. All this is achieved under AEZ by instituting appropriate
interventions at the Government level and producer-exporter level.
In this context, the State of Maharashtra has added nearly 10 lacs Ha.
Under Horticulture over the past 10 years. Production from 50% of this
newly added area is expected to start yielding in the next few years.
76
This will mean substantially greater potential for marketing of horticulture
produce from the State with possibility for greater export, Keeping this in
mind, the State of Maharashtra, the leading State in exports of fresh and
processed fruits and vegetables from the country today, has identified eight
potential horticultural crops of commercial importance for AEZ. Creation of
AEZ will give required momentum for steady and systematic growth of
exports of these produce from the State.
Under AEZ a number of specific activities or interventions, agency
responsible for implementation and funding needs have been identified.
Interventions are suggested in the areas of production, post-harvest
management, marketing and research and development areas.
Responsibility for coordination lies with the nodal agency, the Maharashtra
State Agricultural Marketing Board.
The nodal agency with support and cooperation from the Department of
Horticulture, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Industries,
the Department of Finance, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB)
and other agency/agencies would implement the AEZ in a time bound and
effective manner. Requirement of funds under AEZ are proposed to be met
from private and co-operative sector with subsidies/grants from Central and
State Government and loan availed from bank and financial institutions.
Agri Export Zones in Maharashtra and implementing agencies
Source: https://www.msamb.com/export/default_aez.htm
77
BE AN EXPORTER
Establishment of Firm
For import or export of any item, Import - Export Code (IEC) is mandatory. For
availing IEC, establishment needs to be registered with appropriate
authorities‘ viz. Proprietorship / Partnership / Private Limited Company /
Public Limited Company / Co-operative Society / Farmer Producer
Organization /Trust etc. IEC can be availed on individual name also. Current
Account in any Nationalized / Scheduled Cooperative / Multinational Bank,
having a foreign exchange facility, is required in the name of establishment.
Formats can be downloaded from website http://dgft.delhi.nic.in/ and
download option ANF 2 A.
Import - Export Code (IEC)
IEC can be obtained on submission of information in prescribed formats (Part
A& Part D) completed filled and signed addressed to ―Joint Director General
of Foreign Trade‖ (JDGFT), Pune / Mumbai / Nagpur.
Set of SELF CERTIFIED documents should be enclosed with application as
follows:
1. Firm / Establishment registration certificate - Photo copy
2. Permanent Account Number (PAN) from Income Tax Department –Photo
copy (with Front / Back )
3. Banker's certificate in Part ‗B‘.
4. Two Passport size photographs of the Chairperson / Proprietor of the
establishment. Photos pasted on the Bank Certificate should be endorsed by
the bankers.
5. Demand Draft of Rs. 500/- favouring ―Joint Director General of Foreign
Trade‖ payable at Pune or Mumbai or Nagpur as per the jurisdiction.
78
6. RBI / NRI Declarations on Letterhead (As per the formats)
7. Memorandum and Articles of Association for Pvt Ltd Companies, Partner
Ship Deed for Partnership Companies etc.
8. A4 Size Two Envelopes &Rs. 50/- Postal Stamp.
9. MSAMB charges Rs. 500/- to farmers, Rs. 1000/- to cooperative
organizations &Rs. 2000/- to private exporters (plus 14.5% Service tax)
towards guidance fees.
The forms completely filled in all respects to be submitted in ONE copy to
Joint Director General of Foreign Trade at the addresses given below, by
hand or by post (Registered AD).
How to locate Importer?
An importer can be located through various searches. Following sources will
be helpful to find such importers.
Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority
(APEDA),
Indian Trade Promotion Organisation (ITPO)
Mahratta Chamber of Commerce, Industries and Agriculture (MCCI&A)
After getting this information,
Exporter can directly approach to the importer with the details of product, rate,
packing etc. through fax / email and negotiate further to finalize the order. If
necessary, samples should be forwarded to the importer and it should
represent the material.
79
Mode of payment
Normally in the trade of agro exports (accept onion, rice, other cereals, mango
pulp), importer normally don‘t provide Letter of Credit (L/C). Such export is
done on consignment basis (payment as per actual sales). Exporters get the
payment after deducting port charges, transportation and commission etc. of
the importing country. In certain countries export is undertaken on fixed rates.
Market Credit of the importer should be checked before entering into the
trade. Importer's credit can be checked by international credit organizations
viz. Dun and Bradstreet.
Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India (www.ecgc.in) ECGC also
undertakes such type of credit certification work along with Credit Insurance.
Trade for products like onion, rice, cereals, processed products is done
through Irrevocable 100% Letter of Credit (L/C) at site.
Customs / Excise Formalities and charges
For agro exports, excise stuffing is mandatory in producing area. Accordingly
stuffing permission can be availed from Local Excise authorities.
Understand the importers need
Quality parameters such as size, packing, temperature requirements should
be obtained from the importer before packing of the product. It is better to get
requirement from the importer in writing. Pack the material strictly as per the
samples provided to the importer. Confirm the standards of raw material,
packaging material with the importer‘s requirement.
80
Procedure of shipment
Services of Customs House Agents (CHAs) to be booked to carry out
necessary logistics and paperwork required for export. Job like space booking
for air exports, order for the container, custom clearance, certificate of origin
etc. is carried out by CHA. An efficient and competent CHA should be
appointed. Following is the list of documents required to be provided to CHA.
Letter of Credit (If available)
Invoice
Packing List (If items are more)
Certificate of origin.
Phytosanitary certificate–Can be availed from Directorate of Plant
Protection, Quarantine and Storage, Ministry of Agriculture.
Air transport charges are normally five times costlier than sea
transport. Perishable commodities like:
Sales Proceed:
Sales proceed gets deposited in the bank in foreign currency. Exporter gets
the amount in Indian rupees after conversion of the foreign currency. Bank
also deducts the commission from the converted amount. Bank also intimated
the exporter about the arrival of Foreign Exchange and generates Bank
Realization Certificate (BRC). Export documents including Shipping Bills,
Export Promotion (EP) copy should be retained by exporter. Credit worthiness
of the importer is of most importance. If by any chance the amount gets stuck
by any chance, the issue can be followed up with the help of ECGC or any
private Debt Collection Agency (DCA). Such agencies are available
worldwide. D&B is also working as DCA.
The exporter has to prepare Invoice while exporting the produce. The sample
for the same is as follows:
81
INVOICE FORMAT
Exporter : Address of the Exporter
Phone Fax No.
Invoice No.
Date
Exporters Ref.
Buyer's Order No. Date Other
reference(S)
Consignee : Address of the Importer
Phone Fax No.
Buyer (If other than consignee) N.A.
Pre Carriage by Place of Receipt of
per carrier
Country
of Origin
of
Goods
Country of Final
Destination
Vessel/Freight
No.
Port of Loading Terms of Delivery and Payment
Port of Discharge Final Destination
Marks No. Description
Nos./cont. Goods
no. & Kind of
package
Quantity Gr.
Wt.
Rate US$
/ carton
Amount
US$
TOTAL NT WT : F O B
GR WT. : FREIGHT
AWB/B/L NO. :
C
&
F
Total
Amount Chargeable: (In words)
Declaration
We declare that this invoice shows the
actual price of the goods described and
that all particulars are true and correct.
FOR <Name of the exporter>
Signature & Date,
Authorised Signatory,
82
FARMING
MSAMB has 150 Acres of land at Talegaon Dabhade, near Pune, Which is
being used for Training and Demonstration purpose. This land is divided into
two farms known as Main Farm and Gilbil Patti. The details of these two farms
are as follows:
Source: https://www.msamb.com/activities/farming.htm
Main Farm
The Total area under main farm is 100 acre, out of which 42 acre is under
natural lake, which is used for aqua culture and irrigation. 30 acre is cultivable
area.
Gillbill Patti
The Total area under Gilbill Patti farm is 50 acre, out of which 18 acre is under
NIPHT (Horticulture Training Centre) 22 acres under Horticulture crops, viz,
10 acre Guava, 2 acre Sapota, 8 acre Mango, 1 acre Aonla, 1 acre Coconut.
83
Chapter – 6
History of APMC Market Mumbai
Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) is a statutory market
committee constituted by a State Government in respect of trade in certain
notified agricultural or horticultural or livestock products, under the Agricultural
Produce Market Committee Act issued by that state government.
6.1 Vashi APMC: The trade hub that feeds Mumbai
Spread over a sprawling 122 hectares, the Mumbai Agricultural Produce
Market Committee at Vashi is entry point of all foodgrains and vegetables
meant for the extended region of Metropolitan Mumbai.
Every day, nearly 1,800 tonnes of vegetables — enough to provide 90 grams
to each of the 2.02 crore residents of Mumbai, Thane and Navi Mumbai — roll
into the yard from vegetable producing areas like Nashik, Pune, Satara,
Sangli and other parts of Maharashtra as well as from outside the state.
"The supply centres of vegetables change with season. At times, almost 80
per cent of the produce could be from the state. It can, however, dip to as low
as 40 per cent at times with vegetables coming from outside the state,"
Avinash Patil, deputy secretary of the APMC, said.
These vegetables ferried by farmers are then weighed and sorted in the yard
according to their quality. As per rules, a committee of APMC officials, traders
and farmers are supposed to grade the quality of the produce.
Farmers complain that only a part of this lot is graded, in violation of the rules.
As per rules, the farmer has to pay APMC a sum ranging from 0.2 % to 2 %
as fee for facilitating the sale of his produce.
84
After separation, the stock is then sold with the help of commission agents,
who charge anywhere between eight to 15 per cent from the farmer for
helping him sell his produce. Under the existing rules, they are supposed to
take only between 2 to eight per cent.
Interestingly, under the Model APMC Act, the central government has stated
that no commission should be taken from the farmer.
The wholesellers who buy the produce then ferry the produce to the retailer
who then sells it to consumers. Along the chain, the farmer seems to come off
as the worst affected. There could be a price difference of almost 60 per cent
by the time the product reaches a consumer.
Development OF “APMC” (THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET
COMMITTEE)
There is running 101 year of co- operative activities in all over India. The main
aim of co- operative committee is to help the members or people and doing
the social activities.
In past, when the APMC was not created, there were several difficulties of
farmers to sell his agricultural products, because of the lack of the market for
selling the agricultural products.
If the farmers sell his product without the market they face many problem
related with transport, protection of product etc or raise the many complain
related with merchant. To solve this problem, some people were gathered and
decided to create the committee for relating to farmers, merchant and other
people. Then finally established the APMC in 1953 with Rs. 6267.74 income
and Rs. 1345.06 permanent fund.
The first chairperson of the committee was Shri. Dr.Hariprasad V. Bhatt. To
start this committee with aim to solve the farmers complains against the
merchant and to give the proper price of the farmer‘s products.
85
Now this committee completed 54 years and come in 55 years and his
development is very good during the 54 years. This is the appreciated aspect
of this committee.
The APMC created in 1952 the growth of this committee is very slow
comparing to others committee. But in last 16 months the young chairperson
Mr.P.P.Sojitra develops the APMC, which had not done in last 54 years. The
development is as under.
1. The APMC arrange the shades to protect the farmer‘s products.
2. The R.C.C. road arrange in all market ground.
3. The shops and godown arrangement for merchant.
4. The dining hall and canteen facility is also providing.
5. In farmer rest house it is providing facility like hotel in nominal charge.
6. The ambulance service is starting with nominal charge Rs. 3-/ per km
for farmers, merchants and whole district by APMC.
7. The farmer Information center is also start for giving the different
information to farmers relating to farming.
8. The cotton laboratory is arranged to know the cotton quality for
merchants and farmers.
6.2 Principles
APMC operate on two principles:
Ensure that farmers are not exploited by intermediaries (or money
lenders) who compel farmers to sell their produce at the farm gate for an
extremely low price.
All food produce should first be brought to a market yard and then sold
through auction.
86
6.3 Features
Each state which operates APMC markets geographically divide the state and
markets (mandis) are established at different places within the state. Farmers
are required to sell their produce via auction at the mandi in their region.
Traders require a license to operate within a mandi. Wholesale and retail
traders (e.g. shopping mall owners) and food processing companies cannot
buy produce directly from a farmer.
Some of the salient features of the APMC Model Act 2003 are as follows 1)
Facilitates Contract farming model 2) Special market for perishables 3)
Farmers, private persons can setup own market 4) Licensing norms relaxed
5) Single market fee 6) APMC Revenue to be used for improving market
infrastructure. However, not all States have passed the bill. Some States have
passed but neither framed rules nor notified it. Thus, inter-state barriers
continue. Further, Union Budget 2015 proposed to create United National
Agriculture Market with the help of State Government and NITI Ayog.
Examples within states:
Karnataka
The state government of Karnataka has created APMCs in many towns to
enable farmers to sell their produce at reasonable prices. Most APMCs have
a market where traders and other marketing agents are provided stalls and
shops to purchase agriculture produce from farmers. Farmers can sell their
produce to agents or traders under the supervision of the APMC.
Farmers cannot sell produce outside the APMC mechanism. However, the
government is now encouraging direct selling through 'Rautu Bazar' or to
supermarkets directly. The present APMC system makes farmers vulnerable
to traders' and marketing agents' price manipulations. The Government of
India is considering improving the APMC Act to benefit all parties involved.
87
Maharashtra
The Maharashtra State Agricultural Marketing Board runs 295 APMCs
in Maharashtra, under the APMC Act enacted by the Government of India. In
July, 2016, the Maharashtra State Government removed fruits and vegetables
from the purview of the APMCs. The state government has urged the farmers
to directly bring their produce for sale in Mumbai. Of the 307 APMCs in the
state, 219 are operating, The government has granted 148 Direct Marketing
Licenses of which 91 are for fruits and vegetables. The Pune APMC,
meanwhile, appealed to the farmers from the state as well as from outside to
bring their produce to the market and sell those directly.
Tamil Naidu
In Tamil Nadu, the Tamil Nadu State Agricultural Marketing Board is the
regulatory board for agricultural markets which is successfully running since
1977. 21 Market committees are established for every notified area and 277
Regulated Markets are functioning under these committees for better
regulation of buying and selling of agricultural produce.
6.4 Export and Import Act
The exports and imports activities contribute significantly towards the healthy
growth of any economy. Imports imply bringing of goods into the country to
fulfil the domestic need and when the country supplies surplus goods to
foreign countries, it is termed as exports. When a wide gap between the
exports and imports rate arises then serious economic problems like inflation
and Balance of Payment weakens the integrity of the existing economy. Thus
for maintaining appropriate balances between exports and imports the state
authority has forged various types of legal frameworks in terms of different
Acts and policies.
88
In India there are several Acts and policies enacted to have a uniform practice
in export & import trade practices. Among those Acts, Imports and Exports
(Control) Act 1947, Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act 1992
and Import- Export (Exim) Policy 1997-2002 are few significant Acts and
policies. Import export act was introduced by Government during Second
World War and it lasted for around 45 years and in June 1992 this act was
superseded by the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation Act), 1992. The
basic objective of this new act was to give effect to the new liberalized export
and import policy of the Government.
The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act 1992 has empowered
the Government to:
Enact provisions related to development and regulation of trades for
domestic as well as international market.
Restrict and regulate all forms of exports and imports in case of
requirements and declare tariff exemption by accessing special needs.
Announce an EXIM policy and its episodic amendments by notification.
Authorise the concerned officials to issue „Importer Exporter Code.
Number (IEC) to the exporters and importers.
Till 1985 annual policies were made but from 1985-92, three year policy was
made and then 5 year policy was made coinciding with 5 year plans. 1992-97,
1997-02, 2002-07(2004-09); and 2009-14.
89
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
90
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
91
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
92
Source: MAPMC 31st March 2016
93
Chapter – 7
Contribution of APMC to India‟s Export Growth
Achievements OF ―APMC‖ (THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET
COMMITTEE) & Achievements:
The words awards and achievements are the same meaning but it quit
different. Awards means medal or shield for some achievement. So it‘s
combined words.
The APMC is not a trading firm or company but a committee for farmers. It
protects the farmer and give him the sufficient price of its products it is the
biggest achievement. Now a day the quality is the important things and in
every field it is very important for firm or company or committee.
The committee gets ISO 9001-2000 certificate from ICS (International
Certification Services (Asia) Pvt. Ltd.) for complying with the requirements of
the following international standard and this committee is the first in India to
get this certificate. Scope: Provides service and liaison to farmers,
Commission agent and businessman for agriculture, produced crops sale and
purchase as per market value.
Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) is a statutory market
committee constituted by a State Government in respect of trade in certain
notified agricultural or horticultural or livestock products, under the Agricultural
Produce Market Committee Act issued by that state government.
APMCs are intended to be responsible for:
ensuring transparency in pricing system and transactions taking place in
market area;
providing market-led extension services to farmers;
94
ensuring payment for agricultural produce sold by farmers on the same
day;
promoting agricultural processing including activities for value addition in
agricultural produce;
Publicizing data on arrivals and rates of agricultural produce brought into
the market area for sale;
Setup and promote public private partnership in the management of
agricultural markets
There are about 2477 principal regulated markets based on geography (the
APMCs) and 4843 sub-market yards regulated by the respective APMCs in
India.
The typical amenities available in or around the APMCs are: auction halls,
weigh bridges, godowns, shops for retailers, canteens, roads, lights, drinking
water, police station, post-office, bore-wells, warehouse, farmers amenity
center, tanks, Water Treatment plant, soil-testing Laboratory, toilet blocks, etc.
Legal Background of APMCs
Under Constitution of India, agricultural marketing is a state (provincial)
subject. While intra-state trades fall under the jurisdiction of state
governments, inter-state trading comes under Central or Federal Government
(including intra-state trading in a few commodities like raw jute, cotton, etc.).
Thus, agricultural markets are established and regulated mostly under the
various State APMC Acts.
Most of the state governments and Union Territories have since enacted
legislations (Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee Act) to provide for
development of agricultural produce markets and to achieve an efficient
system of buying and selling of agricultural commodities. Except the States of
Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, Manipur and small Union Territories such as
Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshadweep, etc.
all other States and UTs in the country have enacted such State Marketing
95
Legislations. The purpose of these Acts is basically the same i.e. regulation of
trading practices, increased market efficiency through reduction in market
charges, elimination of superfluous intermediaries and protecting the interest
of producer-seller.
The whole geographical area in the State is divided and each one is declared
as a market area which is managed by the Market Committee (APMC)
constituted by the State Government. States also constitute a Market Board
which supervises these market committees. APMCs generally consist of
representatives of farmers, traders, warehousing entities, registrar of
cooperative societies etc. Market Boards generally consists of chairmen of all
APMCs, representatives from the relevant Government Departments etc.
Once a particular area is declared as a market area and falls under the
jurisdiction of a Market Committee, no person or agency is allowed to freely
carry on wholesale marketing activities. APMC Acts provide that first sale in
the notified agricultural commodities produced in the region such as cereals,
pulses, edible oilseed, fruits and vegetables and even chicken, goat, sheep,
sugar, fish etc., can be conducted only under the aegis of the APMC, through
its licensed commission agents, and subject to payment of various taxes and
fee. The producers of agricultural products are thus forced to do their first sale
in these markets.
The main differences in Acts of different states/UTs are noted in the
following areas:-
Commodity coverage –
A few states cover all the commodities while others provide the list.
Market Committee –
There are differences in no. of market committees and number of members
therein, the appointment of committee members etc.
96
Agricultural Marketing Boards –
Variations in powers exercised by the Boards in different states i.e. their role
vary from advisory to binding.
Demarcation of functions between Director Marketing and Board –
Administrative structure for the implementation structure of the Act vary from
state to state in terms of functions assigned.
Functioning of APMCs: Issues involved-
The APMC system was introduced to prevent distress sale by farmers to their
creditors, to protect farmers from the exploitation of intermediaries and traders
and to ensure better prices and timely payment for their produce through the
auctions in the APMC area. However, APMC Acts restrict the farmer from
entering into direct contract with any processor/ manufacturer/ bulk processor
as the produce is required to be routed through these regulated markets.
Over a period of time, these markets have acquired the status of restrictive
and Monopolistic markets, harming the farmers rather than helping them to
realise remunerative prices.
The APMC Act treats APMC as an arm of the state and the market fee as the
tax levied by the state, rather than as a fee charged for providing services,
which acts as a major impediment in creating a national common market.
Various taxes, fees/charges and cess levied on the trades conducted in the
markets or Mandis are also notified under the APMC Act.
APMCs charge a market fee from buyers, and a licensing fee from the
commissioning agents who mediate between buyers and farmers. They also
charge small licensing fees from a whole range of functionaries (warehousing
agents, loading agents etc.).
In addition, commissioning agents charge commission fees on transactions
between buyers and farmers. The levies and other market charges imposed
by states vary widely. Statutory levies/mandi tax, VAT etc. all add up to hefty
97
amounts, create market distortions with cascading effects and strong entry
barriers. Further, multiple licences are necessary to trade in different market
areas in the same State.
All this has led to a highly fragmented and high-cost agricultural economy,
which prevents economies of scale and seamless movement of agri goods
across district and State borders.
APMC operations are hidden from scrutiny as the fee collected, which are at
times exorbitant, is not under State legislature‘s approval. Agents in an
APMC may get together to form a cartel. This creates a monopoly (a market
situation where there is only one buyer who then exercises control over the
price at which he buys) situation. Produce is procured at manipulatively
discovered price and sold at higher price, defeating the very purpose of
APMCs. Further, APMCs play dual role of regulator and Market.
Consequently, their role as regulator is undermined by vested interest in
lucrative trade. Generally, member and chairman are nominated/elected out
of the agents operating in that market.
Exporters, processors and retail chain operators cannot procure directly from
the farmers as the produce is required to be channelized through regulated
markets and licensed traders. There is, in the process, an enormous increase
in the cost of marketing and farmers end up getting a low price for their
produce.
Monopolistic practices and modalities of the state-controlled markets have
prevented private investment in the sector. Thus, the monopoly of
Government regulated wholesale markets has prevented development of a
competitive marketing system on a pan-India basis, providing no help to
farmers in direct marketing, organizing retailing, a smooth raw material supply
to agro-processing industries and adoption of innovative marketing system
and technologies.
98
Model APMC Act of 2003
An efficient agricultural marketing is essential for the development of the
agriculture sector as it provides outlets and incentives for increased
production and contribute to the commercialization of subsistence farmers.
Worldwide Governments have recognized the importance of liberalized
agriculture markets. Keeping, this in view, Ministry of Agriculture formulated a
model law on agricultural marketing - State Agricultural Produce Marketing
(Development and Regulation) Act, 2003 and requested the state
governments to suitably amend their respective APMC Acts for deregulation
of the marketing system in India, to promote investment in marketing
infrastructure, thereby motivating the corporate sector to undertake direct
marketing and to facilitate a national market.
The Model APMC Act, 2003 provided for the freedom of farmers to sell their
produce. The farmers could sell their produce directly to the contract-sponsors
or in the market set up by private individuals, consumers or producers. The
Model Act also increases the competitiveness of the market of agricultural
produce by allowing common registration of market intermediaries.
Salient Features of the Model APMC Act:
The Preamble of the Act is to provide for development of efficient
marketing system, promotion of agri-processing and agricultural exports and
to lay down procedures and systems for putting in place an effective
infrastructure for the marketing of agricultural produce.
Legal persons, growers and local authorities are permitted to apply for the
establishment of new markets for agricultural produce in any area. Under the
existing law, markets are setup at the initiative of State Governments alone.
Consequently, in a market area, more than one market can be established by
private persons, farmers and consumers.
99
There will be no compulsion on the growers to sell their produce through
existing markets administered by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee
(APMC). However, agriculturist who does not bring his produce to the market
area for sale will not be eligible for election to the APMC.
Separate provision is made for notification of ‗Special Markets‘ or ‗Special
Commodities Markets‘ in any market area for specified agricultural
commodities to be operated in addition to existing markets.
A new Chapter on ‗Contract Farming‘ added to provide for compulsory
registration of all contract farming sponsors, recording of contract farming
agreements, resolution of disputes, if any, arising out of such agreement,
exemption from levy of market fee on produce covered by contract farming
agreements and to provide for indemnity to producers‘ title/ possession over
his land from any claim arising out of the agreement.
Provision made for direct sale of farm produce to contract farming
sponsor from farmers‘ field without the necessity of routing it through notified
markets.
Provision made for imposition of single point levy of market fee on the
sale of notified agricultural commodities in any market area and discretion
provided to the State Government to fix graded levy of market fee on different
types of sales.
Licensing of market functionaries is dispensed with and a time bound
procedure for registration is laid down. Registration for market functionaries
provided to operate in one or more than one market areas.
Commission agency in any transaction relating to notified agricultural
produce involving an agriculturist is prohibited and there will be no deduction
towards commission from the sale proceeds payable to agriculturist seller.
100
Provision made for the purchase of agricultural produce through private
yards or directly from agriculturists in one or more than one market area.
Provision made for the establishment of consumers‘/ farmers‘ market to
facilitate direct sale of agricultural produce to consumers.
Provision made for resolving of disputes, if any, arising between private
market/ consumer market and Market Committee.
State Governments conferred power to exempt any agricultural produce
brought for sale in market area, from payment of market fee.
The State Agricultural Marketing Board made specifically responsible
for:
Setting up of a separate marketing extension cell in the Board to provide
market-led extension services to farmers;
Promoting grading, standardization and quality certification of notified
agricultural produce and for the purpose to set up a separate Agricultural
Produce Marketing Standards Bureau.
Funds of the State Agricultural Marketing Board permitted to be utilized for
promoting either on its own or through public private partnership, for the
following:
market survey, research, grading, standardization, quality certification, etc.;
Development of quality testing and communication infrastructure.
Development of media, cyber and long distance infrastructure relevant to
marketing of agricultural and allied commodities.
As per the final report of the Committee of State Ministers, in-charge of
Agriculture Marketing to Promote Reforms, submitted in January 2013, only
16 States have amended their Act and only six states have notified the
amended Rules. There are some States which do not have APMC Act and
some have partially amended their Act.
101
Karnataka Model provides for a single licensing system, offers automated
auction and post auction facilities. It also facilitate warehouse-based sale of
produce, facilitate commodity funding, prices dissemination by leveraging
technology and private sector investment in marketing infrastructure.
The Model APMC Act does not go far enough to create a national or even
state level common market for agriculture commodities. The Act retains the
mandatory requirement of the buyers having to pay APMC charges even
when the produce is sold directly outside the APMC area.
Though the Model Act provides for setting up of markets by private sector, this
is not adequate to create competition even within the state since the owner
will have to collect fees/taxes on behalf of the APMC in addition to their own
charges.
Suggestions in Economic Survey 2014-15 to Create a National Common
Market in Agricultural Commodities:
The Economic Survey 2014-15 emphasizes on the need for a national
common agricultural market (a Budget Announcement of 2014-15) and
identifies un-integrated and distortion ridden agricultural market as the one of
the most striking problems in agriculture growth.
The Economic Survey suggests 3 incremental steps as possible solutions for
setting up a national market.
It may be possible to get all States to drop fruits and vegetables from
APMC schedule of regulated commodities and followed by other
commodities.
State governments may be specifically persuaded to provide policy support
for alternative or special markets in private sector.
102
In view of the difficulties in attracting domestic capital for the setting-up
marketing infrastructure, liberalization in FDI in retail could create possibilities
for filling in the massive investment and infrastructure deficit in supply chain
inefficiencies.
As a last resort, the Economic Survey suggests using Constitutional
provisions to create a national common market for agricultural commodities.
Economic Survey reemphasize that India needs a national common market
for agricultural commodities by making the Agricultural Produce Market
Committee just one among many options available for the farmers to sell their
produce.
The National Agricultural Market (NAM)
Union Budget 2014-15 (para 82) and Union Budget 2015-16 (para 33) had
suggested the creation of a National Agricultural Market (NAM) as a priority
issue. On 2 July 2015, Union Cabinet unveiled its plan to go ahead with the
project amidst the constitutional constrains as mentioned above.
The National Agriculture Market is envisaged as a pan-India electronic trading
portal which seeks to network the existing APMCs and other market yards to
create a unified national market for agricultural commodities. NAM is a
―virtual‖ market but it has a physical market (mandi) at the back end. NAM is
proposed to be achieved through the setting up of a common e-platform to
which initially 585 APMCs selected by the states will be linked. The Central
Government will provide the software free of cost to the states and in addition
a grant of up to Rs. 30 lakhs per mandi will be given as a onetime measure for
related equipment and infrastructure requirements. In order to promote
genuine price discovery, it is proposed to provide the private mandis also with
access to the software but they would not have any monetary support from
Government.
103
Chapter– 8
Data Interpretations and Major Findings of the Research
1. Nature of the Business?
Particulars Percentage (%)
Vegetable 15
Fruits 15
Food Grains 5
Nuts 15
Dry Fruits 30
Any Other 20
Narration: -
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of 100 respondents,
15 are in Vegetable business, 15 are in Fruit business, 5 are in Food grains
business, 15 are in nuts business, 30 are in Dry Fruits business, and
remaining20 are doing other businesses.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Vegetable Fruits Food Grains
Nuts Dry Fruits Any Other
Percentage (%)
104
2. What is your monthly turnover of your business firm?
Particulars Percentage (%)
Between Rs. 10 - 20 Lakhs 10
Between Rs. 20 - 40 Lakhs 20
Between Rs. 40 - 50 Lakhs 30
Rs. 50 Lakhs & More 40
Narration: -
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of 100 respondents,
10 respondents monthly turnover is Between Rs. 10 - 20 Lakhs, 20
respondents monthly turnover is Between Rs. 20 - 40 Lakhs, 30 respondents
monthly turnover is Between Rs. 40 - 50 Lakhs, and remaining 40
respondents monthly turnover is above 50 Lakhs.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Between Rs. 10 - 20 Lakhs
Between Rs. 20 - 40 Lakhs
Between Rs. 40 - 50 Lakhs
Rs. 50 Lakhs & More
Percentage (%)
105
3. Does your firm import/export to other countries?
Particulars Percentage (%)
Yes 100
No 0
Narration: -
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of 100 respondents,
100 Percent of respondents are in Export / Import Business none of the
respondents are in job doing work.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Yes No
Percentage (%)
106
4. If your firm import then products that they input?
Particulars Percentage (%)
Vegetable 0
Fruits 5
Food Grains 5
Nuts 10
Dry Fruits 30
Any Other 50
Narration: -
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of 100 respondents,
Zero number of respondents are importing Vegetable outside the country,
Five number of respondents are importing Fruits outside the country, Five
number of respondents are importing Food grains outside the country, Ten
number of respondents are importing Nuts outside the country, Thirty number
of respondents are importing Dry Fruits outside the country, and remaining
Fifty Number of respondents are importing other kind of goods outside the
country.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Vegetable Fruits Food Grains
Nuts Dry Fruits Any Other
Percentage (%)
107
5. Annual value of import?
Particulars Percentage (%)
Between 1 Crore to 3 Crore 20
Between 3 Crore to 4 Crore 30
Between 4 Crore to 5 Crore 20
5 Crore& Above 30
Narration: -
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of 100 respondents,
20 respondents annual value of import is Between Rs. 1 Crore to 3 Crore, 30
respondents annual value of import is Between Rs. 3 Crore to 4 Crore, 20
respondents annual value of import is Between Rs. 4 Crore to 5 Crore, and
remaining 30 respondents annual value of import is 5 Crore& above.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Between 1 Crore to 3
Crore
Between 3 Crore to 4
Crore
Between 4 Crore to 5
Crore
5 Crore & Above
108
6. Countries from where they import?
Particulars Percentage (%)
UAE 20
Iran 25
Iraq 25
Others 30
Narration: -
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of 100 respondents,
20 numbers of respondents are importing their goods from UAE, 25 number of
respondents are importing their goods from Iran, 25 number of respondents
are importing their goods from Iraq, and remaining 30 number of respondents
are importing their goods from other countries.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
UAEIran
IraqOthers
Percentage (%)
109
7. If your firm export then products that they output?
Particulars Percentage (%)
Vegetable 15
Fruits 15
Food Grains 5
Nuts 5
Dry Fruits 20
Any Other 40
Narration: -
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of 100 respondents,
15 number of respondents are exporting Vegetable outside the country, 15
number of respondents are exporting Fruits outside the country, 5 number of
respondents are exporting Food grains outside the country, 5 number of
respondents are exporting Nuts outside the country, 20 number of
respondents are exporting Dry Fruits outside the country, and remaining40
Number of respondents are exporting other kind of goods outside the country.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Vegetable Fruits Food Grains
Nuts Dry Fruits Any Other
Percentage (%)
110
8. Annual value of export?
Particulars Percentage (%)
Between 1 Crore to 3 Crore 20
Between 3 Crore to 4 Crore 30
Between 4 Crore to 5 Crore 20
5 Crore& Above 30
Narration: -
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of 100 respondents,
20 respondents annual value of export is Between Rs. 1 Crore to 3 Crore, 30
respondents annual value of export is Between Rs. 3 Crore to 4 Crore, 20
respondents annual value of export is Between Rs. 4 Crore to 5 Crore, and
remaining 30 respondents annual value of export is 5 Crore& above.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Between 1 Crore to 3
Crore
Between 3 Crore to 4
Crore
Between 4 Crore to 5
Crore
5 Crore & Above
111
9. Countries to where they export?
Particulars Percentage (%)
USA 30
China 20
UAE 30
Others 20
Narration: -
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of 100 respondents,
30 number of respondents are exporting their goods to USA, 20 number of
respondents are exporting their goods to China, 30 number of respondents
are exporting their goods to UAE, and remaining 20 number of respondents
are exporting their goods to several other countries.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
USA China UAE Others
Percentage (%)
112
10. What are the challenges you are facing while import/export?
Particulars Percentage (%)
Yes 83
No 17
Narration: -
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of 100 respondents,
83 Percent of respondents are facing problems while Export / Import of goods
and remaining17 percent of the respondents are not facing any problems
while Export / Import of goods.
Yes
No
83
17
113
11. What type of help do you get from the government?
Particulars Percentage (%)
Trading 15
Financing 5
Documentation 10
Bank Support 35
Transportation 30
Any other 5
Narration: -
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of 100 respondents,
15 number of respondents are getting Trading as an help from the
government, 5 number of respondents are getting Finance as an help from
the government, 10 number of respondents are getting Documentation as an
help from the government, 35 number of respondents are getting Bank
Support as an help from the government, 30 number of respondents are
getting Transportation as an help from the government, and remaining 5
number of respondents are getting other kind of help from the government.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Percentage (%)
114
12. Are you aware of any promotional efforts due by the government to
help in import/export?
Particulars Percentage (%)
Yes 2
No 98
Narration: -
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of 100 respondents,
only 2 Percent of respondents are aware of promotional efforts taken by the
Government and remaining 98Percent of the respondents are not aware of
any promotional efforts taken by the Government.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Yes No
Percentage (%)
115
13. Do you think it is beneficial to have clusters like the APMC Market
which will help in promoting import/export?
Particulars Percentage (%)
Yes 98
No 2
Narration: -
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of 100
respondents,98 Percent of respondents are beneficial to have clusters like the
APMC Market which will help in promoting export/import of goods and
remaining 2 Percent of the respondents are not beneficial to have clusters like
the APMC Market which will help in promoting export/import.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Yes No
Percentage (%)
116
14. The government of India is emphasising on the ―Make in India‖
concept. What challenges do you see in the ―Make in India‖ concept
becoming a reality?
Particulars Percentage (%)
Yes 5
No 95
Narration: -
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of 100 respondents,
only 5 Percent in reality of respondents are facing challenges due to ‗Make in
India‘ concept brought by an Indian government and remaining 95 Percent in
reality of respondents are not facing any kind of challenges due to ‗Make in
India‘ concept brought by an Indian government.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Yes No
Percentage (%)
117
15. The Government has recently passes the ‗GST‘ Bill. Do you think the
‗GST‘ bill is useful to you?
Particulars Percentage (%)
Yes 80
No 20
Narration: -
The graphical representation of the table shows that out of 100 respondents,
80 Percent of respondents are saying that ‗GST‘ bill is useful to expand their
Export/Import of goods business and remaining 20 Percent of respondents
are saying that ‗GST‘ bill is not useful to expand their Export/Import of goods
business.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Yes No
Percentage (%)
118
Chapter–9
Recommendations and Conclusions
APMC should create more focused and cohesive efforts to help and assist
exporters to penetrate into new markets and support them wherever
necessary. The ultimate result of this should be to make India stand in the
forefront in creating the Brand India concept of the government, based on the
policy announcements. Another important point is that the APMC should act
as a catalyst for timely disbursement of the incentives falling under their
purview. Additional incentives announced under the special focus initiative as
per the policy for both focus products and focus markets are made available
to all the eligible exporters well in time and this will be a highly motivating
factor for the exporters. APMC should also understand that any delay
happening in disbursement of the incentives or delay in recommending for the
same will result in exporters losing faith in the government and their
announcements. Hosting an interactive website, and more focussed
newsletters providing the changes in various laws/ statutes affecting
exports/imports of different countries and also regularly updating the website
with such changes will be a welcome measure as this helps to keep the
exporters abreast of the basic information. APMC should add quality
improvement in their agenda in conducting training and updating programme
in the commercial fields. Risk management and mitigation of risk, spreading
the importance of various insurances and their impact on the sustenance of
business should be made as a part of the workshops / training programmes /
seminars etc. Ultimately the members should understand that covering the
risk should not be seen as statutory requirements, but it is for the safety of
their own business. APMC mainly network with Indian embassies abroad.
This should be made wider by networking with other global trade promotion
organisations and benefits of outcome / knowledge /information to be passed
on to members. Finally timely and quick response by APMC should be their
agenda of operations as time is an important factor in international trade and
ultimately Time is money.
119
Chapter – 10
Annexure
10.1 Bibliography
1. Anil Chopra September 15, 2015,
http://www.pcquest.com/imc-vashi-small-scale-industries/
2. NijhumRudra April 19, 2016,
http://www.pcquest.com/sme-expansion-faces-bottlenecks-due-to-lack-of-
capital-and-it/
3. ParthaSarathiBiswas June 16, 2016
http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/agriculture-reform-
breaking-the-trader-cartel-2855435/
4. Abhishek Waghmare April 19, 2016
http://www.rediff.com/business/special/special-indias-biggest-farm-reform-is-
916-behind-target/20160419.htm
5. Economic Survey 2014-15
http://www.arthapedia.in/index.php?title=Agricultural_Produce_Market_Comm
ittee_(APMC)
6. Faisal Tandel | Posted 11-Jul-2016
http://www.mid-day.com/articles/mumbai-pay-more-for-vegetables-as-traders-
to-go-on-mass-leave/17419189
7. Ashok Valunj, a trader TNN | Dec 29, 2016,
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/navi-mumbai-vashi-apmc-
traders-incur-20-per-cent-losses/articleshow/56226465.cms
120
8. Deepa Krishna, Saturday, June 20, 2009
http://mumbai-magic.blogspot.in/2009/06/wholesale-market-at-vashi-asias-
largest.html
9. Partha Sarathi Biswas | Vashi | Pune | Published: June 16, 2016
http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/agriculture-reform-
breaking-the-trader-cartel-2855435/
10. CNBC-TV18 Nov 24, 2016
http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/cash-crunch-apmc-market-hit-
hard_8013841.html?utm_source=ref_article
15. AMIT SRIVASTAVA | Tue, 6 Dec 2016 DNA
http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report-apmc-export-complex-at-vashi-
struggles-to-crack-a-deal-2280092
10.2 Webliography
1. http://www.apmcvashi.in/
2. www.msamb.com
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricultural_produce_market_committee
4. http://www.navimumbai.com/apmc.aspx
121
10.3 Appendix
Dear Sir,
Kindly allow me to introduce myself as an M Phil. student who is
currently working on the project “To Study The Issues And Challenges Of
Export Market With Special Reference To Vashi Agricultural Produce
Market Committee Market, Navi Mumbai” at the D Y Patil University School
of Management under the guidance of Prof. Dr. R. Gopal.
I would be grateful if you spare some time to fill the questions given
below. Needless to say that the informatics provided would be kept
confidential.
FORMAT OF CERTIFICATE
(To be filled in by the applicant)
1. Name of the Respondent ______________________________
2. Address of the Respondent ______________________________
_____________________________
3. Date of establishment _____________________________
4. Nature of the Business
o Vegetable
o Fruits
o Food Grains
o Nuts
o Dry Fruits
o Any Other (Specify) ______
5. What is your monthly turnover of your business firm?
o Between Rs. 10 - 20 Lakhs
o Between Rs. 20 - 40 Lakhs
o Between Rs. 40 - 50 Lakhs
o Rs. 50 Lakhs & More
122
6. Does your firm import/export to other countries?
o Yes
o No
7. If your firm import then products that they input?
______________________________________________________________
8. Annual value of import?
______________________________________________________________
9. Countries from where they import?
______________________________________________________________
10. If your firm export then products that they output?
______________________________________________________________
11. Annual value of export?
______________________________________________________________
12. Countries to where they export?
______________________________________________________________
13. What are the challenges you are facing while import/export?
______________________________________________________________
14. What type of help do you get from the government?
o Trading
o Financing
o Documentation
o Bank Support
o Transportation
o Any other (Specify) _________
15. Are you aware of any promotional efforts due by the government to help in
import/export?
o Yes (Specify) __________
o No
123
16. Do you think it is beneficial to have clusters like the APMC Market which
will help in promoting import/export?
o Yes
o No
17. If yes, what benefits do you see?
______________________________________________________________
18. If no, what are the challenges that you face?
______________________________________________________________
19. The government of India is emphasising on the ―Make in India‖ concept.
What challenges do you see in the ―Make in India‖ concept becoming a
reality?
______________________________________________________________
20. The Government has recently passes the ‗GST‘ Bill. Do you think the GST
bill is useful to you?
o Yes
o No
21. If yes, in what way?
______________________________________________________________
22. If no, what challenges do you see?
______________________________________________________________
This certificate is issued as per the details of our records.
Yours faithfully,
(Signature)
Place __________ Name _______________
Date __________ Designation _________