To Err is Human Cognitive errors physicians make Apology in medical practice.
-
Upload
gwendolyn-summers -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of To Err is Human Cognitive errors physicians make Apology in medical practice.
To Err is Human
Cognitive errors physicians makeApology in medical practice
Safety of Health Care?
• At least 44,000 people, and perhaps as many as 98,000 people, die in hospitals each year as a result of medical errors that could have been prevented
• Error is eighth leading cause of death in the US• Preventable medical errors in hospitals exceed
attributable deaths to motor-vehicle accidents, breast cancer, or AIDS
http://www.nap.edu/books/0309068371/html/
Human Error
• An error is a failure of achieving the intended outcome in a planned sequence of mental or physical activities when that failure is not due to chance
• Slips that result from the incorrect execution of a correct action sequence
• Mistakes that result from the correct execution of an incorrect action sequence.
Medical errors
The failure of a planned action to be completed as intended or the use of a wrong plan to achieve an aim.
• adverse drug events and improper transfusions, • surgical injuries and wrong-site surgery, • suicides, • restraint-related injuries or death, • falls,• burns, • pressure ulcers, • mistaken patient identities.
Types of Errors
Diagnostic • Error or delay in diagnosis • Failure to employ indicated tests • Use of outmoded tests or therapy • Failure to act on results of monitoring or
testing
Treatment • Error in the performance of an
operation, procedure, or test • Error in administering the treatment • Error in the dose or method of using a
drug • Avoidable delay in treatment or in
responding to an abnormal test • Inappropriate (not indicated) care
Preventive • Failure to provide
prophylactic treatment • Inadequate monitoring
or follow-up of treatment
Other • Failure of communication • Equipment failure • Other system failure
Leape et al., 1993
Diagnostic errors
• Misdiagnosis occurs in 15% to 20% of all cases; in half of these there is serious harm to the patient
• 80% of misdiagnoses are due to cognitive errors
• Can thinking about thinking help prevent these errors?
Thinkink traps
• Anchoring• Availability• Attribution• Confirmation bias• Representativeness error
Anchoring
• Fixing on a particular bit of information or data given to us and then think in a constrained linear way
• Patient´s complaint of gas cause clinicians to initially miss an abdominal aneurysm
Availability
• Being influenced by dramatic or unusual cases that are prominent in our memory and easily recalled, thus „available“ when we consider a new patient´s problem
• Crohn´s disease with initial symptom of weight loss and fatigue; each specialist who sam the patient considered diagnoses in their own particular field
Attribution error
• Being influenced by certain personal characteristics, those that correspond to social stereotypes
• Elderly woman with failure to thrive diagnosed „odl age“; poor food intake and weight loss were due to masseter claudication from temporal arteritis
• Wealthy businessman in India could not have leprosy as a cause of his neuropathy since this was a disease of the poor
Confirmation bias
• Ignoring or racionalizing contradictory data to make the pieces of the puzzle fit neatly into the presumed picture
• An unusual complaint or laboratory finding is dismissed as an outlier when it should actually rise a red flag
Remedies
Ask yourself:• What else could it be?• Does anything not fit?• Could there be more than one process at
work?
Groopman and Hartzband, 2011
Apology in medical practice
Apology in Medical Practice
• 1999 Institute of medicine Report: To Err is Human
• Physicians were encouraged to disclose medical errors
• Offering an apology = next step• The goal: to enhance patient safety and fulfill an
ethical commitment of honesty to patients• The outcome: reduction in the number and
cost of malpractice claims
Apology• An acknowledgment of responsibility for an offense coupled with
an expression of remorse.• An offense refers to a physical or psychological harm caused by an
individual or group that could or should have been avoided by ordinary standards of nehaviour.
• A failed medical procedure or action caused by a physician´s poor judgment that would be so regarded by the medical community at large would be an offense.
• An unfortunate ouctome, such as unsuccesfull surgery or other medical treatment that is widely reagrded as high risk by patient, is not regarded an offense for which aplogy should be offered. In such case consoling comments: „ I am so sorry for what happened“
Poor judgment vs. Unfortunate outcome in high-risk patient
• A failed medical procedure or action caused by a physician´s poor judgment that would be so regarded by the medical community at large would be an offense.
• An unfortunate ouctome, such as unsuccesfull surgery or other medical treatment that is widely regarded as high risk by patient, is not regarded an offense for which aplogy should be offered. In such case consoling comments: „ I am so sorry for what happened“ .
Structure and content of apology
Part 1: The acknowledgement
• Includes: The indentity of the offender, appropriate details of the offense and validation that the behaviour was unacceptable.
• The acknowledgement that the patient was not at fault.
• The acknowledgement between physician and patient of shared values , what is right and wrong.
Part 2: Explanations
An explanation of why and how the offense occured.
• „I was late because of a medical emergency“: mitigate the offense
• „I left the operating room to go to the bank“: aggravate the offense
• „There is just no excuse for what happened.“• „We are still trying to find out what happened.“
Part 3: Expression of remorse and a deep regret about what happened
• Remorse: deep sense of regret• Shame: the emotion associated with failing to
live up to one´s standards• Forbearance: commitment not to repeate the
offense• Humility is the state of being humble, not
arrogant
Part 4: An offer of reparation for damages
• Early scheduling of the next appointment • Financial (canceling the bill, a financial
settlement,..)• Verbal• Otherwise
Goals of the apology
1. Restoring dignity and power2. Regaining trust3. Feeling cared for4. Extending empathy and understanding5. Letting go
patients do not want to be disrespected, humiliated or disempowered
Framework of the apology
Who is present for the apology discussionWhere the apology takes place
The nature of emotional interaction
Who should be present
• The patient• Family member or friend selected by the
patient• The attending physician• Nurse, other staff and hospital administration
need to be considered
The setting of the discussion
• A room that affords privacy and is comfortable • Cell phones turned off• Distraction and interruptions should be
avoided
The timing of the apology
• Formal and complete apologies should be witheld until the presence and nature of the offense or mistake are clear
• The suggestion by the physician for follow-up meetings to track the patient´s progress and listen to concerns that have not previously been verbalized
The nature of the interaction
Clinical Coaching
Education
Motivational Interviewing
Barrier-free Access
doctoras sparingpartner, shares knowledge,communicates comprehensibly, respects patient´s opinion, negotiates procedure,offers choice
The nature of the interaction
• The patient should have the opportunity for catharsis, verbalizing feelings about the event and the physician.
• Ask Open questions• Affirm• Listen Reflectively• Summarize
The need for a dialogue
• Dialogue!! Partnership! • Not a rapid monologue by the doctor that
prevents interruption by the patient will leave the patient dissatisfied
• The patient will have concerns, worries, questions and feelings.
Non-barrier communication!
How apologies heal
• Restoration of self-respect and dignity• Feeling cared for• Restoration of power• Suffering in the offender• Validation that the offense occured
Some patients want to see their offending physician suffer;
Patients may try to force the resignation of someone on the
treatment team
How apologies heal
• Designation of fault• Assurance of shared values• Entering into a dialogue with the offender• Reparations• A promise for the future
Patient and family need the opportunity toask questions and
express feelings: anger, fear, helplessness, frustration and
abandonment; respond with EMPATHY
Who offers and receives the apology
• The physician in charge, the nurse, the resident…
• Who receives the apology: the pacient, family members or both
Timing of Apologies
• As soon as it is ascertained that a medical error has occured
• Before such determinaniton is made and fault assigned the physician may express concern of what hapenned pending further exploration
• An unreasonable delay in communication is often perceived as disrespectful or deceitful
Apology as a Negotiation
• A back and forth between two parties over how much the physician is willing to offer and how much the patient needs
• The subject of negotiation – all structures and functions of the apology
How apologies fail
• Due to fraudulence, insincerity or disingenuousness
• Experienced as insulting or offensive, not healing
• They make the situation worse
Errors in apologizing
• The failure to adequaetely acknowledge the offense:
• Too vague: „ I apologize“ ; „ I apologize for whatever happpened“;
• Sorry is used to avoid acknowledging the offense: „ I am so sorry for what happened“
• The passive voice: „ mistakes were made“• If or but is used to mitigate the offense: „ If there
was an error“; there was a mistake, but….“
Errors in apologizing
• Unacceptable explanations: „ the alcohol made me do it“
• Arrogance instead of shame or humility „these things happen to the best people“
• Unacceptable reparations
Resistance to apologize
• The fear of consequences: angry patient, a complaint sent to the state board, malpractice suit Evidence suggest that
admissions of harm and apologies strengthen rather
than jeopardize relationships and diminish punitive
responses
Resistance to apologize
• The need for physicians to maintain a self-image for themselves and others of being strong, always in charge, unemotional and a perfectionst
• The feared loss of this self-image may lead to the unbearable emotion of shame and subsequent feelings of depression
Offenses other than medical errors
• The humiliation of medical students (especially females) by their supervisors was a ritual practice
• Physicians´ behaviour that humiliate or offend patients: excessive waiting times, failure to address the patient by his name, violations of privacy, failure to listen and explain,…
Conclusion• Effective apology = the most profound healing
process between individuals, groups, nations.• It may restore damaged relationships or
strengthen previously satisfactory relationship• For the offender, offering an apology may
diminished guilt, shame and the fear of retaliation• For the offended party receiving an apology may
remove a grudge with it anger, and facilitating forgiveness and reconciliation
• Aaron Lazare. Apology in Medical Practice. JAMA, 2006- vol 296, No 11