To Be or Not to Be...

7/21/2019 To Be or Not to Be...

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/to-be-or-not-to-be-56d9b33c420a6 1/12

Author’s Note Adamus: The Act of St. Germain Introduction I. At the Threshold 1. I

Exist 2. What is Enlightenment !. Who is "es#onsi$le %. In This &ifetime '. At

the Threshold II. (uman and )i*ine +. (uman Needs ,. -our rimar/ (uman

Issues 0. om#aring (uman and )i*ine a. assion *s. Needs $. Sensual *s.

Emotional c. Ex#erience *s. Action d. "adiance *s. udgment e. Wisdom *s.

3emor/ 4. "eunion III. S#iritual h/sics

Saint5Germain6 Adamus7 (o##e6 Geo8re/7 9en/o (o##e6 &inda 2;1'5;!52;<. Act

of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened . rimson ircle ress. =indle

Edition.

rimson ircle A$out Adamus Saint5Germain A$out Geo8re/ (o##e A$out &inda

9en/o (o##e A$out the rimson ircle Glossar/ Author’s Note Who >ould ha*e

thought I used to as? m/self that @uestion e*er/ da/. Who >ould ha*e thought I

>ould $e communicating >ith angelic $eings and Ascended 3asters As a /oung$o/ gro>ing u# in Wisconsin6 I thought m/ life >ould follo> in the footste#s of

those I admired the most6 es#eciall/ m/ grandfather6 a >ell5res#ected la>/er

and udge. 3/ life too? man/ t>ists and turns6 Blled >ith #lent/ of ?nots and

tangles. I @uestioned man/ of m/ life choices6 $ut mostl/ I @uestioned m/ fate.

Wh/ did certain things ha##en to me C



Edition.

>hether I considered them to $e good or $ad C that seemed far $e/ond m/

control or choice Wh/ did life seem so fragile6 /et >h/ did the hand of destin/

seem so Brm and clear Along the >a/ I >as a >riter6 an ad*ertising gu/6 a

$usinessman6 an in*entor and an entre#reneur. I started and o>ned $usinesses6

sometimes *er/ successful and other times close to the Dames of insol*enc/. I

li*ed in Wisconsin6 alifornia6 Texas and olorado. As a mar?eting consultant6 m/

greatest o/ >as hel#ing clients e8ecti*el/ communicate their message. As an

entre#reneur6 m/ greatest achie*ement >as co5founding an a*iation

telecommunications com#an/ that is no> one of the >orld’s $iggest #ro*iders ofInternet ser*ices on $oard $usiness and commercial aircraft. I smile to thin? that

I ha*e t>o .S. #atents in Fmulti5dimensional communications. Who >ould ha*e

thought that I >ould $e communicating on multi#le dimensional le*els6 >hether

it >as in the a*iation $usiness or >ith angels -or the #ast 1' /ears6 I’*e had the

honor of $eing a messenger for a select grou# of angelic 3asters: To$ias6

=uthumi lal Singh and St. Germain. Each of these 3asters li*ed man/ lifetimes as

regular humans $efore their enlightenment. The/ come $ac?





Edition.

no> to remind us of >hat >e alread/ ?no>6 $ut >hat >e lost in the act of #la/ing

human. The/ remind us that there is nothing to achie*e $ecause it is alread/ so.St. Germain uses the term F?asama. It means Fthe soul’s desire. =asama is the

?no>ingness that /ou are alread/ enlightened and ascended6 $e/ond the

$oundaries of time6 and no> /ou are going through the ex#erience of >hat it >as

li?e to realiHe it. It is alread/ done6 so no>6 ho> >ould /ou li?e to ex#erience it

No>6 instead of as?ing m/self FWho >ould ha*e thought I ust smile and

realiHe that I alread/ ?ne>. I didn’t ?no> the details that >ould $ring me to this

#lace of communication >ith the Ascended 3asters6 and the details don’t reall/

matter. The fact is that m/ ?asama C m/ soul’s desire C alread/ ?ne> that I >ould

$e here at this #lace of $eing a multidimensional communicator. In s#ite of m/

u#$ringing and $iological famil/6 in s#ite of right or >rong decisions6 e*en ins#ite of ho> I imagined m/ #re5a>a?ened6 non5enlightened self6 it >as m/ soul’s

desire to $e here. There’s nothing magical a$out it. ust allo>.



Edition.

Adamus: The Act of St. Germain -or the Brst 1; /ears of m/ channeling career6 I

>or?ed >ith To$ias. I learned that he >as m/ father in a long5ago lifetime6 a stor/that is told in the $i$lical a#ocr/#hal< 9oo? of To$it. To$ias >as one of the $est

friends I’*e e*er had6 al$eit an in*isi$le one. (e >as lo*ing and #atient6 and

came to me nearl/ e*er/ da/ for channeling and #ersonal s#iritual guidance.

When To$ias left in 2;;46 I started >or?ing >ith St. Germain of the iolet -lame.

Well6 ?ind of. It >as a facet of St. Germain $/ the name of Adamus. Adamus

Saint5Germain6 as he #refers to $e called and s#elled6 is an Fact of St. Germain.

This facet of St. Germain $rings ne> teachings and messages6 through m/ >ife

&inda and I6 to the rimson ircle. Adamus has no regard for alien s#ace $eings6

cons#irac/ theories6 gurus or other ma?/o s#iritual distractions<. (e is here to

>or? >ith those >ho are choosing enlightenment >hile remaining in their#h/sical $odies in this lifetime. (e uses the name Adamus to di8erentiate his

messages to the rimson ircle from his messages through other channelers and

materials. Jou could sa/ that he F#ri*ate la$eled himself ust for the rimson

ircle >or?. 9/ the



Edition.



>a/6 the rimson ircle is o#en6 free and a*aila$le to an/one >ho has chec?ed

their o>n F"ead/ for Em$odied Enlightenment $ox. There is nothing exclusi*e

a$out it. ust ma?e sure /ou’re read/ for some changes in /our life $efore /ou

chec? that $ox. Adamus is an act or ex#ression of St. Germain. (e consciousl/

chose this act $ecause it’s >hat is needed for those >ho #lace their

enlightenment a$o*e all else. If that sounds selBsh to /ou6 Adamus >ill #ro$a$l/

as? /ou to lea*e $ecause there is nothing selBsh a$out lo*ing and honoring

/ourself. We’*e $een taught to $e in ser*ice to others to #lace others Brst< at

great ex#ense to oursel*es. The truth is that /ou can do more for others and the

#lanet and the uni*erse $/ lo*ing /ourself Brst. Then /ou $ecome a Standard or

exam#le to others >ho are struggling for self >orth. Adamus can $e #ro*ocati*e6

aggra*ating6 irre*erent and occasionall/ rude. (e doesn’t care. If a glass of cold

>ater o*er the head is >hat’s needed to get someone out of their com#lacenc/6

he’ll gladl/ dum# it on them. And he has. At the same time6 Adamus is a $rilliant

#rofessor. (e’s humorous6 animated6 engaging6 >ise and cle*erl/ distracting.

AndK it’s all an act. (e ma?es no a#ologies for acting $ecause6 as he #oints out6it’sall an act. (umans act li?e the/’re human6



Edition.

>ith all their limitations and >ea?nesses6 e*en though the/’re not. S#iritual

see?ers act li?e the/ are on the #ath to enlightenment e*en though the/’re not.

The/ are alread/ enlightened. eo#le act li?e *ictims or *illains6 mart/rs orteachers6 children or adults6 e*en men or >omen. 9ut it’s all an act. A child is

alread/ an adult in another #oint of Time6 therefore the/ are not reall/ onl/ a

child. The/ are ust acting li?e a child until the/ transition into their act of an

adult. Jou are no more an unrealiHed6 tr/ing5to5$e5a>a?ened s#iritual see?er

than /ou are an enlightened $eing. Jou are actuall/ $oth6 at the same time.

Jou’re alread/ enlightened and /ou’re also in the disco*er/ of the ourne/ of ho>

/ou got there. It’s so sim#le that most #eo#le >ill shrug it o86 la#sing $ac? into

their act of limitation. 9ut a fe> >ill get it6 em$race it6 and act it. The/ >ill $e

enlightened6 a>a?ening and aslee# at the same time6 $ecause the/ can $e. Lne

moment the/’ll choose to act small and the next moment the/’ll choose to actmagniBcent. 9ecause the/ can. The next moment the/ >ill choose to

simultaneousl/ act limited and full/ realiHed. Enlightenment isn’t a destination. It

is sim#l/ an act of consciousness. Adamus continues to guide us e*er/ ste# of

the >a/. (e continues to entertain us and distract us so



Edition.



>e don’t get caught u# in our o>n distractions. (e lets /ou $elie*e he’s telling

/ou something /ou don’t alread/ ?no>6 $ut he ?no>s /ou ?no>. It’s all an act6 an

act of consciousness. No> the @uestion is: >here do /ou choose to #ut /our

consciousness Introduction &ife is an act. We act li?e humans and therefore >e

ex#erience li?e humans >ith a litan/ of limitations6 shortcomings and dramas

that mas? our underl/ing angelic consciousness. It is an unnatural act that >e

ha*e come to acce#t as realit/. InAct of onsciousness6 Ascended 3aster

Adamus Saint5Germain $egins $/ ex#laining the meta#h/sics of energ/ and

deBning the im#ortant di8erence $et>een consciousness and energ/. Adamus

ma?es a clear #oint that >e are $eings of consciousness C not energ/ C and that

the #assion of



Edition.

our #ure consciousness attracts energ/ from the uniBed Beld to manifest our

realit/. Adamus deBnes the four #rimar/ le*els of energ/ including ore soul<6

r/stalline6 osmic and Earth6 >hile educating the reader a$out ho> the *arious

le*els are used $/ our consciousness to manifest our stage5of5life. Adamus

im#lores the reader to act li?e a 3aster rather than acting li?e a less5than5#erfect

human. This act >ill literall/ change the t/#e of energ/ that is attracted into the

reader’s life6 and therefore change the realit/ theatre that he or she exists

>ithin. Some readers >ill @uestion this a##roaching and sa/6 FIt’s not real

$ecause it’s ust an act6 to >hich Adamus >ould re#l/6 F9ut e*er/thing in /ourlife is ust an act6 so >h/ not act li?e a #ros#erous6 health/ and >ise 3aster This

>ill change the theatre of /our life6 $ut the real @uestion is6 MAre /ou reall/ read/

for a su$stantial change6 or are /ou ust tr/ing to tid/ u# /our current stage’ It

is a remar?a$l/ sim#le and e8ecti*e a##roach to an other>ise mental and

la$orious #rocess of $ecoming /our full #otential.Act of onsciousness>ill amuse

/ou and anger /ou6 and it >ill certainl/ ma?e /ou @uestion /our old $eliefs a$out

ho> realit/ is created and ex#erienced. 9/ the time /ou read Saint5Germain’s

last >ords6 /ou


of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened #. 1<. rimson ircle ress.

=indle Edition.

>ill cr/ a fe> tears of o/ and relief to ?no> that life reall/ is as eas/ as an Act of

onsciousness. Saint5Germain had man/ nota$le #ast li*es6 including that of

William Sha?es#eare and 3ar? T>ain Samuel lemens<. These lifetimes ga*e

him an a##reciation for the theatre6 acting and stor/5telling. I At the Threshold




of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened ##. 15%<. rimson ircle

ress. =indle Edition.

1 I Exist I Am that I Am6 Adamus6 from the essence of Saint5Germain.

Welcome to this li*ing codex. I exist. I existO These are the grandest >ords /oucan e*er #roclaim C FI existO Lh6 it is so sim#le. Would that e*er/ human had

this realiHation dee# >ithin6 in e*er/ moment and >ith e*er/ $reath. 9ut *er/

fe> do. er/ fe> feel or understand >hat this means C FI existO 3ost humans

sim#l/ li*e6 realiHing to a degree that the/ ha*e consciousness6 $ut rarel/

realiHing that their consciousness li*es6 exists and ex#eriences. I exist7 therefore6

I Am. AhO I exist7 therefore6 I can act. I can $e an/thing I >ant. I can $e Adamus. I

can $e Saint5Germain. I ha*e $een man/ di8erent identities in man/6 man/

lifetimes $ecause m/ consciousness6 li?e /ours6 has the a$ilit/ to act.

onsciousness is not singular6 nor is it Bxed in a single ex#ression. )ear friend6

ta?e a good dee# $reath and feel into /our o>n Mact of consciousness.’ Jouridentit/ C this thing /ou tr/ to Bx and re#air and adust and amend C is ust an

act. It’s not real. Lr6 more


of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened ##. %5'<. rimson ircle


accuratel/6 it’s not the onl/ realit/. Jou’*e come to $elie*e that it’s real6 that

an/thing else /ou #ortra/ is either false or not @uite honest. Jou di*e dee#er anddee#er and dee#er into >hat /ou assume is /our identit/6 $ut it is ust an act. It’s

a $rilliant act6 of course6 $ut it’s still onl/ an act6 an ex#ression of something far

grander. Jour mind >ill sa/6 FI ha*e to $e real. I ha*e to $e truthful. 9ut >hat

/ou’re doing right no> isn’t real. At least it’s not the onl/ realit/ or the onl/ truth.

Jou exist7 therefore /ou can act6 /ou can $e and /ou can choose >hate*er /ou

>ant to ex#erience. Jou exist7 therefore /ou can act. And >hen /ou act6 energ/

res#onds to /our consciousness. The >ord Fact comes from the &atin >ord

actus6 meaning Fdoing6 Faction and Fthing done. It doesn’t mean Ffa?ing it or

F#retending. The origin of the >ord Fact means FTo 9e. Energ/ res#onds to

the act of consciousness. This is a *er/ literal statement. Jou act7 energ/res#onds. (o>e*er6 energ/ is *er/ literal. If /ou act li?e a limited human6 energ/

>ill res#ond in ?ind $/ deli*ering more limitation. If /ou act li?e /our life has a lot

of #ro$lems6 energ/ >ill res#ond $/ gi*ing /ou exactl/ that C more #ro$lems. It’s

all an act C a $rilliant6 $eautiful act. Jou see6 all realit/ alread/


of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened ##. '5+<. rimson ircle




exists. It’s not li?e /ou’re tr/ing to create something out of nothing. E*er/ realit/

and e*er/ #ossi$ilit/ alread/ exists6 and /ou can choose >hich #otentials to

allo> into /our life. Which realities do /ou choose to act u#on and ex#erience

E*er/thing is alread/ there. Jou are >hate*er /ou’re acting. Act li?e a student

and /ou’ll get lesson energ/. Act li?e a 3aster and /ou’ll get masterful energ/. In

this $oo?6 >e’re going to ex#lore and ex#erience the Act of the 3aster. We’ll ta?e

a loo? at the #h/sics of energ/6 acting and master/. It is m/ desire to sho> /ou

ho> /ou can act and $e an/thing /ou >ant C and I mean an/thing. I don’t care

a$out /our famil/ lineage6 /our education6 /our health6 /our le*el of a$undance6

/our intellect6 /our I.P. or an/thing else. None of that matters. lease hear those

>ords Cit doesn’t matter. Not /our age6 /our loo?s6 /our >eight or an/thing else

$ecause /ou can change it. Jou can act ho>e*er /ou choose. AhO I feel such a

longing from /ou C FJesO Lh6 #lease6 AdamusO leaseO I >ant this to $e trueO And

at the same time6 FLhhh6 >hat if it’s not What if I can’t do it What if it’s ust

more >ords )ear friend6 in the *er/ hours /ou s#end reading this li*ing $oo?

/ou can ha*e a life5changing ex#erience. It’s as eas/ as ta?ing a dee# $reathand ust $eing in it. I


of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened #. +<. rimson ircle ress.

=indle Edition.

call it this Fstar ho##ing or Jo So/ el unto S#anish<. FI am the #oint. Jo So/ el

unto. I Am the oint of onsciousness. When I sa/ that /ou ha*e an o##ortunit/

for a life5changing ex#erience6 once again it $rings u# an interesting dichotom/. Jou thin?6 FLh /esO A life5changing ex#erienceO That’s >h/ I’m reading this $oo?6

to $ring a$out changes in m/ life. 9ut then the dou$t comes in. FLh6 a life5

changing ex#erience What’s going to change Will it $e $ad or good change

(o> a$out ust a little change6 nothing too drastic. (o> a$out6 m/ dear friend6 a

trul/ life5changing ex#erience It’s not magic. Jou don’t need to ha*e s#ecial

m/stical a$ilities. It’s ust a matter of allo>ing. Are /ou read/ for /our life to

change6 no matter >hat I am right here >ith /ou6 e*er/ ste# of the >a/ in this

enlightenment. I’m here to hel# /ou to see a di8erent #ers#ecti*e. "ight no>

/our #ers#ecti*e is *er/ restricted. Jour consciousness is *er/ focused and

limited. 9ut6 as /ou allo> it to ex#and6 /ou’ll realiHe that enlightenment >asal>a/s there7 /ou ust >eren’t tuned into it. Jou’ll realiHe that all the energ/ >as

there. All the >isdom and the ?no>ledge >as there6 ust >aiting for /ou.

E*er/thing >as alread/ there. All realit/ alread/ exists7 /our ex#erience de#ends

on >hat


of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened ##. +5,<. rimson ircle

ress. =indle Edition. /ou’re dialed into6 >hat act /ou are choosing. Will it ta?e a

/ear or ten or Bft/ for /ou to start realiHing /our enlightenment It’s alread/there6 no> it’s ust a matter of realiHing it. Jour enlightenment is not a goal out



there some>here in the future. It’s right here6 sim#l/ >aiting to $e realiHed. I can

tal?6 #ush and #ro*o?e6 $ut ultimatel/ >hat it ta?es is someone Bnall/ allo>ing

their enlightenment and then for others to see it. At that #oint I >ill >or? directl/

>ith those >ho ha*e allo>ed their enlightenment6 $ecause there are going to $e

genuine challenges >ith sta/ing in the #h/sical $od/. There’s a strong seduction6

#articularl/ in the Brst /ear or t>o of enlightenment6 to lea*e the #h/sical $od/.

Jou’ll still ha*e some aches and #ains6 feeling li?e /ou’re carr/ing around a

$urdensome $od/6 $ecause /ou’re also going to $e a>are of /our ne> &ight

9od/6 and /ou’ll >onder6 FWh/ should I sta/ in this tired old #h/sical $od/ The

ans>er is: $ecause the longer /ou sta/ in it6 the #h/sical Desh and $one >on’t

feel so hea*/ an/more. And6 as /ou sta/ on Earth as an em$odied 3aster6 others

>ill see >hat is #ossi$le. When /ou $ecome enlightened and immediatel/ lea*e

the #lanet6 the/ don’t ha*e the a$ilit/ to see /ou6


of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened ##. ,50<. rimson ircle

ress. =indle Edition. touch /ou6 or hear /ou7 so I’ll $e >or?ing closel/ >ith those

>ho choose to sta/ em$odied on Earth as enlightened 3asters. Q Q Q Jou could

ha*e realiHed /our enlightenment @uite a >hile ago6 lifetimes ago in fact. Jou

could ha*e ust allo>ed6 $ut /ou didn’t. It’s #ro$a$l/ not that /ou >ere afraid of

it6 not that /ou >eren’t read/ for it. No6 the o##ortunit/ >as there to realiHe /our

enlightenment a long time ago6 $ut /ou didn’t. Wh/ Jou ?ne> that going

through enlightenment se*eral lifetimes ago >ould result in #h/sical death

$ecause the energies >ere *er/ dense6 *er/ di8erent. 9ac? then it >as much

more diRcult to sta/ in the $od/ >hile going through the *er/ intense #rocess of

em$odied ascension. art of /ou ?ne> that /ou might onl/ ha*e a fe> $rief

moments to sta/ in the #h/sical $od/6 $ecause >ith enlightenment comes a *er/

seducti*e desire to lea*e the #h/sical realms due to the harsh challenges of

human existence. Jou ?ne> that /ou >anted to $e an em$odied 3aster6 not a

dead 3aster. Jou >anted to >al? the Earth C feeling the ground $eneath /ou6

eno/ing things li?e laughter6 friendshi#6 self5lo*e6 and ex#eriencing life in o/ C

as a 3aster6 so /ou said6 FI’ll >ait6 e*en



=indle Edition. though /ou could ha*e done it $ac? then. Jou also said6 FI >ant to

ex#erience m/ enlightenment >ith a grou# of ?indred s#irits. I >ant to

ex#erience it >ith others >ho are realiHing their a>a?ening on this #lanet at the

same time. I don’t need them for m/ enlightenment6 $ut ho> much grander it

>ill $e to ha*e others of common $ac?ground and similar ex#eriences to laugh

the sacred laugh >ith6 to eat the sacred food and drin? the sacred >ine

together C e*er/thing is sacred after /ou’re enlightenedO C so /ou said6 FI’ll

>ait. And here /ou are6 in the lifetime of enlightenment. It’s actuall/ the lifetime

of realiHing of /our enlightenment6 $ecause it is alread/ there. This lifetime is



a$out the em$odiment of /our enlightenment. I am here to remind /ou of this

choice6 of /our soul #assion for enlightenment7 to remind /ou of its sim#licit/7 to

remind /ou that it’s #ro$a$l/ not >hat /our mind has construed it to $e for it is

*er/6 *er/ di8erent than >hat the human ex#ects. I am here to remind /ou that

right $efore enlightenment is the time of the greatest distractions C distractions

that could easil/6 >ithout exaggeration6 ta?e /ou four or B*e lifetimes to get

through. Therefore6 I am here in o/ful ser*ice to /ou C to #rod and #ro*o?e6 to

amuse and entertain6


of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened ##. 051;<. rimson ircle

ress. =indle Edition. and to remind /ou of /our soul choice for the realiHation of

/our enlightenment. 2 What is Enlightenment What is enlightenment 3ost

#eo#le thin? enlightenment is >hen e*er/thing gets eas/. It doesn’tO 3ost #eo#le

thin? enlightenment is >hen mone/ suddenl/ Do>s in and e*er/$od/ lo*es /ou

and honors /ou and thin?s /ou’re sex/. Not necessaril/. ro$lems don’t

necessaril/ go a>a/6 $ut there’s a >hole di8erent #ers#ecti*e on #ro$lems and

issues. Suddenl/6 the/’re not $ig


of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened ##. 1;511<. rimson ircle

ress. =indle Edition. monsters and demons an/more. Suddenl/6 the/’re ust

minor nuisances and irritations that /ou can easil/ >al? a>a/ from. 3an/ #eo#lethin? that enlightenment is a$out $ecoming all5?no>ing6 that an Ascended

3aster ?no>s e*er/thing. No. In enlightenment6 /ou actuall/ ?no> less than /ou

e*er did $efore6 $ecause the data and details $ecome less im#ortant. -acts and

Bgures are irrele*ant. 3ath and science are nice $ut the/ are not reall/ the $asis

of creation. In enlightenment6 there is sim#liBcation6 reduction6 distillation. Jou

don’tneed to ?no> e*er/thing. I am often as?ed a$out facts and Bgures of things

that ha##ened hundreds or thousands of /ears ago. I reall/ don’t ?no> and I

reall/ don’t care. I guess I could Bnd out6 $ut it’s not so im#ortant. Enlightenment

is not a$out ha*ing #s/chic a$ilities such as seeing into the future. Jes6 as an

enlightened $eing6 e*er/one >ill Doc? to /ou and >ant to ?no> >hat’s going toha##en tomorro>. And I can alread/ tell /ou the ans>er to gi*e them: tomorro>

>ill $e much li?e toda/ $ecause humans tend to follo> #atterns. The/ get into

ruts and reall/ don’t ma?e *er/ man/ life5changing choices. The/ li?e to ma?e

little adustments C a little more mone/6 a little more $read and circus C $ut



=indle Edition. the/ sh/ a>a/ from real changes. "ather than suddenl/ ?no>ing

or ha*ing e*er/thing6 enlightenment is integration. Jou integrate all of /ouras#ects6 as >ell as /our soul $eing and human $eing6 into the I Am. The



issues and dee# fears C $e/ond most fears /ou’*e e*er felt. Wh/ 9ecause

e*er/thing that is stuc? and unresol*ed >ithin has to come $ac? into $alance6 so

it comes for>ard. That’s >h/ /ou ha*e Dash$ac?s of su##ressed childhood

memories or encounter Fghosts of /ourself from the #ast. Then /ou tr/ to heal

them and #rocess them and do all sorts of things to get rid of them6 $ut the/ are

there for a reason. The ghosts from /our #ast are coming $ac?6 not to $e Bxed or

re#aired6 $ut to $e integrated. The/’re coming $ac? $ecause #art of /ou ?no>s

/ou’re at the threshold of enlightenment and it’s time to integrate. Nothing is left

$ehind6 no #arts or #ieces. E*er/


of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened #. 1!<. rimson ircle ress.

=indle Edition. single #article of /ou comes $ac? for integration. Jou come no>6

after man/6 man/ lifetimes6 to this #oint of enlightenment and oh6 it is a *icious

>arrior. There is nothing air/5fair/ a$out enlightenment. It has nothing to do >ith

FNe> Age. It is a *icious6 ruthless >arrior. It is also a $eautiful6 sensual $eautiful

lo*er. It is /our >orst enem/7 it is /our $est friend. This time in /our life right no>

is the $est6 most $eautiful of times. I ?no> it’s also one of the most diRcult times

/ou’*e e*er had6 $ut I >ant /ou to remem$er that it is trul/ the $est of times. I

?no> there are da/s >hen /ou feel li?e /ou’re $eing #ut through a grinder6 da/s

>hen /ou feel #ul*eriHed $/ /ourself6 >hen /ou feel li?e /ou’re $eing ri##ed

a#art lim$ $/ lim$ and thought $/ thought. 9ut it is trul/ the $est of times as

>ell6 $ecause it’s the time that /ou’*e chosen for integration6 freedom and

enlightenment. 3an/ s#iritual see?ers as? me6 FAm I going to do it in this

lifetime Am I going to realiHe m/ enlightenment It’s totall/ doa$le C and it’s

totall/ u# to /ou. Some as? if the/ ha*e the >here>ithal to endure it6 $ecause

the/ feel at the *er/ end of their energ/. The/ don’t e*en ?no> if the/ ha*e the

stamina to get through the next da/ let alone the grueling ste# into

enlightenment. The ans>er isK


of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened ##. 1!51%<. rimson ircle

ress. =indle Edition. a$solutel/6 /ou do. )uring our time together in the #ages of this $oo?6 /ou’ll realiHe that it actuall/ doesn’t ta?e an/ >or?. It doesn’t re@uire

an/ stamina. Jou’*e resisted so man/ things in life and this has exhausted /ou.

No>6 as /ou release the resistance6 the energies naturall/ re$alance and then it

doesn’t ta?e the last of /our energ/. It doesn’t call for /our strong >ill and

determination to realiHe this thing called enlightenment. Enlightenment is the

natural e*olution for e*er/ souled $eing. Jou cannot stud/ /our >a/ into

enlightenment. There’s not an/ $oo? that can gi*e /ou the code or the ?e/ to

enlightenment. Jou’*e studied man/ things in the #ast C #hiloso#h/6 religion6 the

m/steries C and the/ ser*ed /ou at the time. 9ut none of them ha*e the ans>er

for /ou no>. Not the 9i$le6 the =oran6 the Torah6 or an/ other hol/ $oo?6 $ecause

the/ >ere all >ritten $/ unenlightened $eings. Smart $eings6 nice $eings6 $ut not



enlightened $eings. Jou >ill disco*er that enlightenment comes naturall/. It ta?es

no e8ort. Jou don’t ha*e to use /our >ill#o>er or determination. There’s nothing

to force. So often I see /ou >or?ing at /our enlightenment6 #ushing at it6

e8orting >ith it. No6 dear friend. It doesn’t ta?e an/ e8ort6 and all the struggle

>ill actuall/ $ecome a


of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened ##. 1%51'<. rimson ircle

ress. =indle Edition. distraction. Enlightenment comes >ith allo>ing. Allo>ing is

li?e surrender6 and that’s a hard thing to do. It’s a total surrender to /our Self C

not to some un?no>n God6 $ut to /our Self. In surrendering there is an innate

fear that something might go >rong6 that /ou’ll $e hurt. Jour mind and /our

as#ects are ha##/ to remind /ou of all the mista?es and $ad decisions /ou’*e

e*er made. The/’ll sa/ that if /ou surrender and allo>6 /our defenses >ill $e

do>n and dar? energies and entities can come in. So /ou resist. Jou thin? a$out

letting go6 $ut /ou don’t actuall/ allo> it. Jou thin? a$out surrendering6 $ut then

do it in *er/ small increments. Jou continue holding onto the illusion of /our

identit/. Through the ages I’*e had so man/ students >ho thin? that

enlightenment or s#iritualit/ is a$out understanding their identit/. It is not at all6

other than to understand that the identit/ is ust an act. Along the ourne/ to

enlightenment6 /ou’ll go through the #hase of di*ing dee# >ithin /ourself6 going

into the inner disco*er/. 9ut6 at a certain #oint /ou’ll realiHe /ou’re ust di*ing

dee#er into an identit/ that’s reall/ ust an act. Jou’*e $een tr/ing to solidif/ and

*alidate /our identit/6 to ma?e it e*en more real and correct6 $ut6 at some #oint6

/ou’ll


of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened #. 1'<. rimson ircle ress.

=indle Edition. realiHe it’s time to surrender to /our Self. It’s time to ta?e a dee#

$reath and sim#l/ allo>. It sounds eas/6 $ut it’s the most frightening thing a

human >ill e*er do. It sounds so sim#le6 $ut /et /ou’ll Bnd a million reasons not

to do it. Jou are Bnall/ here at the threshold of enlightenment $ecause of /our

determination6 /our strong >ill6 and /our damn stu$$ornness. That’s a goodthing u# to a #oint. Jou’*e endured. Lh m/ god6 ho> /ou’*e endured one thing

after another C assault6 $atter/6 torture6 $eating /ourself u#6 letting others $eat

/ou u#6 e*er/thing else C loo?ing for the ans>ers. Jou’*e endured6 and I gi*e /ou

an honorar/ medal for endurance. 9ut no> it’s time to crush that medal6 $ecause

>ill#o>er and endurance is not going to $ring enlightenment. It $rought /ou to

this #oint6 $ut no> it’s time to realiHe that /ou don’t ha*e to force or #ush or

>or? at an/thing. Nothing. At the threshold of enlightenment6 it’s all a$out

allo>ing.




of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened ##. 1'51+<. rimson ircle

ress. =indle Edition. ! Who Is "es#onsi$le (ere’s a $ig @uestion for /ou:

Who is res#onsi$le for /our enlightenment Thin? a$out it for a moment $efore

/ou read on. What ans>er did /ou Bnd 3/ ans>er6 >hich doesn’t ha*e to $e

/ours6 is: /our soul. Jour soul6 /our di*init/6 >hate*er /ou >ant to call it6 is

res#onsi$le for /our enlightenment. ust feel into that for a moment. What a

tremendous releaseO Jou6 the human as#ect6 don’t ha*e to Bgure it out. Joucan’t

Bgure it out6 and that’s the little hidden secret to this. The human as#ect has no

conce#t >hatsoe*er of true enlightenment or ascension. It sim#l/ cannot

concei*e of it6 other than to imagine a greater6 grander *ersion of itself. The

human as#ect6 >ith its mental focus and sur*i*al instinct6 has certain structures6

needs and desires6 and the/ ha*e nothing to do >ith going $e/ond. Jour human

as#ect is not see?ing enlightenment or e*en more a>areness. In fact6 the human

identit/ >ill actuall/ >or? against /ou at times $ecause it does not


of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened ##. 1+51,<. rimson ircle

ress. =indle Edition. understand a>areness or enlightenment. It understands

mental acti*ities6 sur*i*al6 emotions7 $ut it does not understand enlightenment.

It couldn’t #ossi$l/ understand $ecause it >as ne*er intended for this #ur#ose6

and it certainl/ should not $e $urdened >ith tr/ing to Bgure it out. Lne of the

#itfalls of man/ of the humans >ho are coming close to enlightenment is the

$elief that the/6 the human6 must achie*e it. The/ get in*ol*ed in #rograms and

goals related to their enlightenment6 tr/ing to manage all the minutia and the

details >hen the/ don’t e*en understand enlightenment6 ho> the energies are

>or?ing or >hat’s reall/ ha##ening in their life. The human as#ect gets *er/

in*ol*ed in enlightenment $ecause it feels the #assion for that coming from the

soul. The human as#ect also is a little tired of the tedium of e*er/da/ life and

>ants something di8erent6 such as a $etter life6 so it ado#ts this thing called

enlightenment6 thin?ing of it as a means to a $etter life. Enlightenment is not a

$etter life. It is a totall/ ne> life6 com#letel/ di8erent than an/thing the human

has e*er ex#erienced. The res#onsi$ilit/ for /our enlightenment lies >ith /our

soul6 /our di*init/. Jou6 the human as#ect6 still not full/ a>are of ho>


of onsciousness: To 9e or Not to 9e... Enlightened ##. 1,510<. rimson ircle


To Be or Not to Be...

Documents

Transcript of To Be or Not to Be...