TNO Milieu, Energie en Procesinnovatie CO2 emissions Inland Traffic and Bunkers Netherlands.

10
O Milieu, Energie en Procesinnovatie CO2 emissions Inland Traffic and Bunkers Netherlands

Transcript of TNO Milieu, Energie en Procesinnovatie CO2 emissions Inland Traffic and Bunkers Netherlands.

Page 1: TNO Milieu, Energie en Procesinnovatie CO2 emissions Inland Traffic and Bunkers Netherlands.

TNO Milieu, Energie en Procesinnovatie

CO2 emissionsInland Traffic and Bunkers

Netherlands

Page 2: TNO Milieu, Energie en Procesinnovatie CO2 emissions Inland Traffic and Bunkers Netherlands.

Apeldoorn, donderdag 13 mei 2004

2

Presentation overview

• Introduction• Present situation in the Netherlands• Differences between methods• Recent developments• Conclusions

Page 3: TNO Milieu, Energie en Procesinnovatie CO2 emissions Inland Traffic and Bunkers Netherlands.

Apeldoorn, donderdag 13 mei 2004

3

Introduction

• The Netherlands is small industrialised country (200x300

km) with dense population• Most active seaport in the world (Rotterdam) strongly

connected to European continent by inland waterways• Airport that acts as a major hub (Schiphol) in international

aviation network

Page 4: TNO Milieu, Energie en Procesinnovatie CO2 emissions Inland Traffic and Bunkers Netherlands.

Apeldoorn, donderdag 13 mei 2004

4

CO2 from bunkersEnergy statistics

0,0

10,0

20,0

30,0

40,0

50,0

60,0

70,0

19

90

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

Year

CO

2 (M

ton

)

LUBE OIL

DIESEL

HFO

JETFUEL

Page 5: TNO Milieu, Energie en Procesinnovatie CO2 emissions Inland Traffic and Bunkers Netherlands.

Apeldoorn, donderdag 13 mei 2004

5

CO2 National Traffic cf. UN-FCCC

0,0

5,0

10,0

15,0

20,0

25,0

30,0

35,0

40,0

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

Year

CO

2 (

Mto

n)

Aviation

Rail Traffic

Fishing

Seashipping

Inland shipping

Off Road

Road Traffic

Page 6: TNO Milieu, Energie en Procesinnovatie CO2 emissions Inland Traffic and Bunkers Netherlands.

Apeldoorn, donderdag 13 mei 2004

6

CO2 National TrafficNational territory method

0,0

5,0

10,0

15,0

20,0

25,0

30,0

35,0

40,0

45,0

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

Year

CO

2 (

Mto

n)

Aviation

Rail Traffic

Fishing

InlandSeashippingInlandshippingOff Road

Road Traffic

Page 7: TNO Milieu, Energie en Procesinnovatie CO2 emissions Inland Traffic and Bunkers Netherlands.

Apeldoorn, donderdag 13 mei 2004

7

Differences between methods

Transport Mode

UN-FCCC

Equal ?

National Territory

Bunkersinvolved

Remark on UN-FCC-method

Road Traffic F ≠ A No  

Off Road F = F No  

Inland shipping A = A Yes Fuelbased not possible

Seashipping - ≠ A Yes All international traffic

Fishing n.a. ≠ A Yes Fuelbased not possible

Rail Traffic F = F No  

Aviation A ≠ A YesAcitivity data not easy available

F= FuelbasedA=Traffic based

Page 8: TNO Milieu, Energie en Procesinnovatie CO2 emissions Inland Traffic and Bunkers Netherlands.

Apeldoorn, donderdag 13 mei 2004

8

Some remarks

• As a consequence fuel tax harmonisation bunker fuel figures

of inland shipping in energy statistics are not reflecting

inland traffic• As fishing is a very small sector in the Netherlands bunker

market fuel based inventory is very difficult• As the Netherlands is a very small country assessment of

inland aviation is disproportional to the relevance of the

emission

Page 9: TNO Milieu, Energie en Procesinnovatie CO2 emissions Inland Traffic and Bunkers Netherlands.

Apeldoorn, donderdag 13 mei 2004

9

Recent developments

• Activity based emission modelling of all shipping modes

(finished)• Inland aviation put on a low (but still too high) default

emission value (consideration)• Inclusion of Sea fishing and Military emissions in UN-FCCC

emission inventory (ongoing)• General QA/QC-procedures (ISO-9001) are applied,

upgrading to international requirements is started

Page 10: TNO Milieu, Energie en Procesinnovatie CO2 emissions Inland Traffic and Bunkers Netherlands.

Apeldoorn, donderdag 13 mei 2004

10

Conclusions

• Proper discrimination between inland / intra EU and international bunkers seems not to be possible in national energy statistics

• Activity (=traffic) based emission inventories could deliver flexible solutions to many problems

• Correction of bunker statistics with activity based data is probably not advisable because loss of the independent control function of bunker statistics

• Yearly traffic data are not readily available for all transport modes (aviation) but the consequences for emission data of the Netherlands are very limited