T Greyvensteyn

19 July 2018

TMM Collision Management – AMRE Update

Agenda

2

1. Regulatory Requirements2. Minerals Council Project

• 2018 focus• Stakeholder progress• Solution Testing Strategy• Pilots

Mining Houses ASPASA

Labour

OEMsPDS

Suppliers3rd Party Suppliers

DMR

MRAC 7th February 2018 proposed implementation datesMHSC Board to approve

…..where there is a significant risk of such collisions……• All operations should already have completed a risk assessment to determine significant

risk

Trackless mobile equipment must be provided with means:…..to automatically detect the presence of pedestrians / equipment to effectively warn the operator and the pedestrian of such a presence• ‘Proximity Awareness’ - should already be implemented (2015)

…..and in the event where no action is taken to prevent potential collision, further means shall be provided to retard the “trackless mobile machine” to a safe speed where after the brakes of the diesel powered “trackless mobile machine” are automatically applied.• ‘Collision Avoidance’ – MRAC proposed implementation dates that still have to be

confirmed and then submitted to MHSC:1. Electrical/Battery Powered Equipment – no period of grace2. New Diesel Equipment to be Collision Avoidance ready – July 20193. Underground Diesel – end 2020 Reg. 8.10.1.2 (b)

4. Opencast and Open Pits – end 2020 Reg. 8.10.1.2 (b)

5. Surface – end 20203

TMM Related Fatalities2016 - 9

2017 - 122018 – 6 June YTD

“Trending 12”

Way Forward

Way Forward as proposed by MRAC – proposal to be confirmed by MRAC before passing on to MHSC1. New proposed dates for diesel equipment – end 2020

• MRAC to evaluate global Vehicle Interaction regulatory requirements and supplier capacity2. Minerals Council Project with CM&EE Task Team to coordinate the Way Forward3. Operations to communicate their strategy to their workforce4. DMR to align Regional PIs

‘Significant Risk’ to be determined by each site through a risk assessment process.• All TMM both underground and surface• Focusing on Vehicle-Pedestrian & Vehicle-Vehicle interactions• Effectiveness of Traffic Management Plans will reduce significant risk?• Resultant CMS Strategy and Implementation Plans

On any mine where there is ‘significant risk’ CMS must be implemented…1. Collision Awareness – PDS Solution – the next 18 months

• Must be implemented across all ‘significant risk’ TMM – no period of grace• Implement Traffic Management Plans to reduce the risk – MOSH Leading Practice• Implement a Change Management Plan to reduce the number of alarms and non-compliance• Operations to ensure that PDS Awareness Solutions are able to achieve Avoidance

2. Collision Avoidance – Intervention PDS/OEM Solutions• Battery and Electrical Powered – no period of grace• Accelerated solution development

➢ Selected Development / Test sites➢ End 2019 - develop at least 5 competitive, robust, cost effective solutions➢ 2020 - to roll-out with a Change Management Plan

• Operations to budget for implementation4

Presentation headline Arial Bold 12pt

5

Task Team

Members

• Harmony

• Kumba

• Anglo Coal

• Anglo Platinum

• Petra Diamonds

• Lonmin

• AGA

• Impala

• De Beers

• Sasol

• Sibanye

• Gold Fields

• Exxaro

• South 32

• Glencore Alloys

• Glencore Coal

• ASPASA

• Royal Bafokeng

• RBM (RIO)

Chamber of Mines CMS Initiative

Project Objectives

• Give direction to the industry

• Aligned with global and MOSH initiatives

• Coordinate the Way Forward

– To define the Mining House CMS Strategies

– Influence development of PDS solutions

– Motivate OEMs to commit

– Work with the DMR

• Accelerate the development of solutions in South

Africa through the following initiatives:

1. Incident Analysis

2. Risk Guidelines

3. Industry User Requirements

4. Technology Development Process

5. Accelerated Pilots

6. Solution Evaluation

• Communicate the progress to the DMR, PDS

Suppliers, OEMs, Industry Engineers, CEOs, RTF

Meetings and MHSC

5

2019

13-Nov-17 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Dec

1. Incident AnalysisUpdate DMR Analysis

2. TMM Risk GuidelineUpdate Risk Guidelines

3. Industry User RequirementsUpdate User Requirements

Develop Interface Protocol

4. Technology Process AssessmentDevelop & Test process

Evaluate PDS Suppliers

Evaluate OEMs

Feedback

5. Project Monitoring

Pilot Site Monitoring

6. PDS Solution EvaluationUniversity of Pretoria Project

Confirm Evaluation Criteria

Commence UG Electric Coal Evaluations

Commence UG Diesel Evaluations

Commence Surface Evaluations

Regulatory Implementtion DatesUnderground Diesel XSurface X

201820172016

MOSH

MOSH

Minerals Council Initiative

Presentation headline Arial Bold 12pt

6

Focus for 20181. Incident Analysis

• Update analysis from DMR Database

2. TMM Risk Guidelines

• Roll-out Guidelines

3. Industry User Requirement Guidelines

• Roll-out Guidelines

4. Stakeholder progress

1. Operations

2. PDS Suppliers

3. OEMs and Third-Party Integrators

5. Project Development and Monitoring

• Focus on and accelerate projects

• At least 5 solutions for the industry

• UG Diesel by end 2019

• Surface – by end 2019

6. PDS Solution Evaluation

• Develop Solution Evaluation process

• Surface and Underground

• With University of Pretoria

• Approved Certification

7. Coordination

• Stakeholder Engagement and Coordination

• Stakeholder communication

• Aligned messaging with defined objectives

• Mining House Presentations

• Industry Workshops (2)

• DMR, MRAC, CM&EE and CEO ZHF updates

6

13-Nov-17 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

1. Incident AnalysisUpdate DMR Analysis

2. TMM Risk GuidelineUpdate Risk Guidelines

3. Industry User Requirements

Rollout User Requirements

Rollout Interface Protocol

4. Technology Process AssessmentDevelop & Test process

Evaluate PDS Suppliers

Evaluate OEMs

Feedback

5. Project Monitoring

Pilot Site Monitoring

6. PDS Solution EvaluationConfirm Evaluation Criteria

Commence UG Coal Evaluations

Commence UG Hard Rock Evaluations

Commence Surface Evaluations

7. CoordinationStakeholder Coordination

Technology Development Roadmap to L9

2018 2019 2020

Concept

Lab Scale

S-Machine

M-Machine

Demonstration L7

L7 - Awareness

Avoidance Concept

Lab ScaleL8 and L9

S-Machine L9

Multiple Machine L9

Roll-out – L9

Avoidance

Co

mp

lexi

ty

Demo L9

Step Change“People and Production”Traffic Management Plans

Change Management

Step Change“Technical”

Demonstration L8

Operational Test Site

7

Sect 21 Technical File

Levels of Control

1. Site Requirements

2. Segregation Controls

3. Operating Procedures

4. Authority to Operate

5. Fitness to Operate

6. Operating Compliance

7. Operator Awareness

8. Advisory Controls

9. Intervention ControlsCollision AvoidanceTakes control from the operator

Proximity DetectionAdvises the operator

Proximity AwarenessAlerts the operator

Operational Discipline Controls

• Risk Guidelines• MOSH TMLP

Design Guidelines• Risk Guidelines• MOSH Traffic

Management Leading Practice (TMLP)

Work Area Controls for all equipment that

could reduce ‘significant risk’

and costs

Technology Controls to address ‘significant

risk’

Regulation 8.10.1 and 8.10.2

8

Operational Strategies and Implementation Plans

9

MI

30

-55

+

10

-30

3-1

0

0-3 0 0-3

3-1

0

10

-30

30

-55

+

L1-Head-on V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8

L2-Reverse-on V-V 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 8

L3-Backup V-V 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 8

L4-Dovetailing V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8

L5-Passing Head-on V-V 7 7 8 8 9 8 8 7 7

L6-Passing Reverse-on V-V 7 7 8 8 9 8 8 7 7

L7-Overtaking V-V 7 7 8 8 8 8 7 7

L8-Blind Approach V-V 8 8 9 9 9 9 8 8

T1-Merge V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

T2-Crossover V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

T3-Junction V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

T4-Intersection V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

O1- Obstacle V-O 7 7 7 9 9 9 7 7 7

P1-Person (direct) V-P - - - - 9 - - - -

P3-Person (indirect) V-P - - - - 9 - - - -

V1-Void V-O 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

V4-Loss of Control LOC 7 7 7 7 9 9 9 7

V6-Congested Area V-V 7 7 8 9 9 9 8 7 7

Speed Ranges

Reverse ForwardOpen Pit / Opencast

SenariosPUE

Stage GateTRL

LevelPDS Date OEM Date Third Party Date Comments

L7 Demonstration 7 Power Supply Suitable Power Supply

L7 Commercial Roll-out 8-9 Minimal InputApproved mounting locations

PDS EMC Compatibility Certification

L8 and 9 Lab Scale Test 4-5 Input onlyOEM to provide vehicle dynamics information

UP / Gerotek Test

L8 and 9 Single Machine Test 6 Operational representative test environment

Technical File Section 21 requirement

L8 Multiple Machine Test 6Demonstrating technical capability in an operational

environment

L8 Demonstration 7 Input onlyDemonstrating capability, reliability, accuracy and

production impact

L9 Demonstration 7Demonstrate conformance to CMS Scope

Target end 2019

L9 Commercial Roll-out 8-9 Full Roll-out end 2020

X

UG Diesel PDS Supplier Solution MaturityCommon Understanding

• Complex Intelligent solutiono Requirements generally underestimatedo Impact on production/maintenanceo Needs direction from operations

• Technology Maturityo Electric Equipment – technology proveno UG Diesel equipment – limited solutionso Surface equipment– more complex solution

10

Target5 Suppliers each

OEM Commitment

Commitment is evident• Need a solution for every model

o Old and newo Solutions are costly

• Third-Party solutions available where OEMs are not committing

• Solution Options for OEMs1. OEM Solution2. Partnering option with Third-Parties3. Third-Party Non-OEM solution – consequences

for all!

11

OEM Action Plans1. Sandvik – got a plan2. AARD – got a plan3. GHH – got a plan4. Fermel – got a plan5. Cat Underground – got a plan6. Rham – Got a plan7. Atlas Copco – reactive plan8. Manitou – plan to be evaluated

9. Komatsu – selective plan10. Hitachi – selective plan11. Volvo – awaiting plan12. Cat Surface – got a plan13. Bell – got a plan14. Liebherr – got a plan

Third-Party Opportunities1. Nerospec2. Sedna3. ECS4. RCT5. HK Diesel

Underground

New Intelligent Models

Older Non-Intelligent Models

Drill Rigs, Roof Bolters, etc.

OEM SolutionOEM/Third-Party

Solution

OEM/Third-Party Solution

Third Party Solution

OEM/Third-Party Solution

Third Party Solution

Surface

Elect Haul Trucks Mech Haul Trucks ADTs, FELs, etc.

OEM SolutionOEM Solution

Third-Party SolutionOEM Solution

Third Party Solution

Solution Testing Strategy

2018 2019 2020

Concept

Lab Scale

S-Machine

M-Machine

Demonstration L7

L7 - Awareness

Avoidance Concept

Lab ScaleL7, 8 & L9

S-Machine L9

Multiple Machine L9

Roll-out – L9

Avoidance

Demo L9

Demonstration L8

Operational Test Site

12

Sect 21 Technical File

UP/GerotekTesting maturity and capability of the PDS

Solution

On SiteCapability of

PDS/OEM/Third Party solution in an operational

environment

Production EnvironmentData driven PDS demonstration to

ensure capability, dependability and impact on production

Dependant on Change Management

Production EnvironmentL9 Switched on

Data driven demonstration to ensure capability, dependability and impact on production of the

total solution

13

Nominated Test SitesMining Type Mining House Mine PDS Supplier Third-Party OEM S/Gate Comments

Anglo Coal Goedehoop Strata Sandvik LHDs only L9 L9 Rolling out

Sasol Midelbult Strata ECS Wright Concept Stalled

Sasol Brandspruit Matrix Sandvik Concept

Exxaro Forzando Strata ECS Sandvik, Wagner Lab Scale Lab Scale Test

Universal NCC Favorsea Favorsea Sandvik, Torro S/MC L9 Solution

Sibanye Kroondal Schauenburg ECS AARD S/MC ???

Sibanye Kroondal Booyco ECS AARD S/MC ???

Sibanye Bathopele Schauenburg Sandvik, AC, Fermal S/MC Restarting

Petra Diamonds Finch Booyco Sandvik S/MC

Petra Diamonds Cullinan Booyco Cat S/MC

Harmony Tshepong A&R Wagner Concept

DeBeers Venetia Booyco Sandvik Concept

Glencore Waterval A&R Nerospec Sandvik, GHH, Rham L9 L9 Rolling out

Assmang Black Rock Booyco Atlas Copco, Cat M/M Progress?

Royal Bafokeng Styldrift Booyco HK Diesel Sandvik, Fermel, Cat S/MC Stalled

Kumba Sishen Safemine Komatsu - 960, 860 L9 L9 Rolling out

Kumba Kolomela Safemine Hexagon/RCT Cat 777 S/MC

Kumba Kolomela Safemine Komatsu - 730, 785 S/MC Proving Grounds S/MC Test

Glencore Impunzi Safemine Cat 777F S/MC Planning S/MC test

Exxaro Grootegeluk Safemine Hitachi Lab Scale

Sedibelo PPM GE RCT? Cat 777E Concept

Anglo Platinum Mogalakwena Modular Komatsu, Cat S/MC Proving Grounds S/MC Test

Harmony Calgold Electro Diesel Bell Concept

Petra Diamonds KevJV Electro Diesel Cat 745 Concept

Glencore Rietvly Electro Diesel Nerospec Bell S/MC Proving Grounds S/MC Test

Canyon Coal Phalandwa Favorsea Favorsea Bell S/MC L9 Solution

Idwala N Cape Booyco Komatsu, Cat Concept

Afrimat Glen Douglas MPI Bell, Westenstarr Concept

Afrisam Eikenhoff TBD Bell, Volvo Concept

Lafarge Nelspruit TBD Cat Concept

Surface Facilities Test sites?

Coal

Underground

Diesel

Hard Rock

Underground

Diesel

-Conventional

- Mechanised

- Block Cave

- SLC

Open Pit

Opencast

Mini Pits

Quarries

14

Provide Direction

• Determine significant risk machines

• Strategy and Plans

• Implement Awareness

• Traffic Management Plans

• Change Management Plans

• Sponsor Development / Test Sites

• Budgeting

Mining houses ASPASA

Accelerated development of a

Complex Solution

PDS suppliers

OEMs

Commit to developing a

Controller for all models

• July 2019 for new

machines

• End 2019 for all models

3rd Party Integrators

Fast-track sustainable

Third-Party solutions

Common Guidelines

Setting the requirements

Support the proposed dates

RegulatorsDMRPIs

In Conclusion

Thankyou

15

Thys Greyvensteyn

Greyvensteynthys@gmail.com

+27 (0) 82 871 7617