4aA11SW8239 2 .7155 T ISDALE 010

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

on the

TISDALE #1 GROUP

Tisdale Township

Hollinger Argus Limited

Timmins, Ontario August 15, 1984

D. R. Alexander

42A115*8239 S.7155 T ISDALE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

010C

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i

CLAIM MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii

INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l

PREVIOUS WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

GENERAL GEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

TABLE OF FORMATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

DESCRIPTION OF UNITS. . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . 8

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

FIGURES

Figure l - Geological sketch map of theTimmins area . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Figure 2 - Distribution of stratigraphicunits in the Timmins area. . . . . 4

MAPS

Geological Survey - Tisdale Groups IB and 2Tisdale Township; Scale 1:2500 . . . . . (in pocket)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author would like to gratefully

acknowledge the able assistance provided by

Messrs. Larry Ferguson and Roy Shegelski of

Esso Minerals Canada - Mr. Ferguson for the

reconnaissance workup, and Dr. Shegelski for

his aid in interpretation.

- 11 -CLAIM MAP

9^^ p — H ighway. 655 W"-- ,- l// . '-. . ? 9? ?,. ^\ M urphy Twp. r~^ \,

I" ,,•TV*;-. ; ~L ' \

~.f

Jt**

A

122*8 r^ •hi ll'!

-i J '*.fi- y//"03*Y /so,•J/'/F---JtrP

.I/it 9 949

A* * .*"

#x'' f.

P . ^ 98S4 ,*h A x* V*-s

^'^m ——Wt~-^fa* 'ATe 5 29975 fi? ^ -

rf. ^•f

xS

i* /e''-.v 59r04B\

fx VX ' V '

p ^ "^561049 ,3

x9 S -4j

1H^

. ^

^•~ \ y -"^t c - -^^- -

p591050 ^

r-/I2ZM 2927^/

oA/p

i I32C* '^P 594782 ^'^-P/

1 ^, * ^.

j. 1 xP^^ f 1325*'

r 94 ''P 594TJ/W

V S& '•t 1H

^ \f ' '

^ xi

P ?" r y •9833

i- *'~1^- - -r'

T V ^ ^ ^J "

139i7. . ..9

(@ x y•s.

1391ft, i f'••C

P * ^ 1229^ 30*/•'/' ;

* J

13256 f ' f 5 947By

so i ft y-y/^ i

L M.V. "-1"X? 30,IO65I '/' *

^/p 9951

*

LOT 8

p13916

\e*p13912

'0

^^Vr-,Charltboit

L o t*~JJoc x'* Lo ^— ^

^ ^^^3j^ j' \ - ,

< P r pDJ59ID47 IJ9HD" ^

* eV ^^v # -

^ ^' . ^

9

- ' ^^,: l - ^---.^P A, ^P \3??4 '^ IS9I5

,'-* /. ~——J

l

t 1

'

P 1 P /^ 14774 . 5834

J

9l J?*

--^4r-

tj07\ :- ;*

^! -

( 91Js.e

P [6335 V2

X -^

X.

s *ffe— "6341^ ^ '^

0J'9

5892 / X

i /*Kx-7 ———— f- S

p59479J '

r " O

P i394792' B 4fcZ ; ~D

?9t594784.ZSe

epss^ys5* 6

ft1

,P LO594785 /- ^L v.

00 [

P? .5M7B8 '

t9lD

i,k ;T~S

p594791

ft

- '

•P 15021

P ft ™594790

f.~

o— •c~^v, Vp r— x12961 — V.

9

^* TISDALE #1?9S

?9P

A

Cp\ ^ p ^ N 'iSL4.VBS ' 59*7^7 l )

,: ^TLOT 7 I LOT 7-^1 J.QT 6 .. . ^ON-VJ;

p , 30'27O66

0

'0,1

P 27067

9

p pBI06P i9576Be

595767 l

ft^(^ 306 5

^p8105 P 595769^!

O

3?C*2

P595770

ft t

P - P i

8(07 {5562

* "1^*,^ 1 ^

!^^- 7-K 1 14" * -- ! ii!'i

] ,-r——— 4'S^ _ J. —-^.- ' P 5?J I13200 ]1

' * !i 'L

P '- . . 1 t 5OTJ4I3

1 S ^e :1 f

Pj\, ' "~

BtdoP 595967

'i ^ \

P254

• •'.'

^ *,

?,o,CON V ,P 595968e

p255

0

^, fP 252

*

___ __ -*^

P13605

t' P253

. */"1

—— - -—— -^1

PJ444 J

i P 33075O

dale Twp11324

9

^ \ ^A798 \ \

P 633T

Vp 76338 lr

6339 634O

9 "

P c? 626*

9 i

-p14644P 595969- a 5 C

j13540

9

^ t~ p

6267

9•c?

p13538

' * ,P13537

*/^ sot

sp ^- — — ''1*373

309 9

P

I36S4

13732 P 595970

P1318*

P 53.0751 ' P 5307559 !

^^^ SCALE 1:20 000'' S - .

P i ^530746 5t0749

1 \. \

•^^ \-- jN 'S- — --4^-^-- -p / ^

530747 ^^- 530748 X- J

P ' P13667 13688P 530752 l P 53O754

ft

P 5JO753

~"^ /

.0, ep13052r~~^

f 5 0P V. eT-al. * .; ^

IP x'J2995' ,

^-

I?7137 OO P 532H3

e^ r,

]

' \

P 12994

- v^0

p13053

91

p\T.*6433

^ ^^ -

6336 -* j9 — -

iS4 ^

^^^s1*^ /t^

-p . _ ^-- ^ ^; 6982 " 1

*

y---

p 12969

O-

'0

. . ,,J

ifM' N J(3Sf.

- l -

INTRODUCTION:

During the fall of 1981, and over the summer of 1982,

a collection of Tisdale Township properties (groups l through 6)

were mapped on a reconnaissance scale by Larry Ferguson of

Esso Minerals Canada - Esso Minerals are joint venture partners

with Hollinger Argus on the Tisdale properties. Subsequently,

in the latter part of June and early July, 1984, the recon

naissance data on the Tisdale #1 Group were 'tightened up' with

check mapping and topographic work by the author.

The ten claims covered by the geological survey {listed

in the accompanying Technical Data Statement) occupy parts of

lots 6, 7 and 8, Concession VI, Tisdale Township.

The claim group lies approximately five kilometers

north of the City of Timmins proper, and is conveniently accessible

via Highway 655 and a combination of gravel roads extending through

the original Hollinger gravel claims.

Topographic variations across the property (excluding

artificial workings within the gravel pits) are in the order of

15-20 meters, with expectations of bedrock depths from 0-30 meters

(average 25-30m). The west part of the property is covered with

sand and gravel deposits of the Tisdale esker complex, while the

east part of the group (essentially east of the lot 7-8 line) is

covered with clays and silts sands of glaciolacustrine origin.

The drier, and topographically higher, esker complex

is characterized by jackpine vegetation with lesser stands of

poplar and birch, while the east part of the property is largely

a wet, spruce, spruce-alder swamp, occasionally mixed with fir,

larch, poplar and birch vegetation.

- 2 -

PREVIOUS WORK:

Until recent years, most of the land in the north

part of Tisdale Township has been patented, with little or no

work having been recorded.

One particular group of consequence, in the south

half of lot 7, Concession VI, was staked by Keevil in 1965,

based on the results of an airborne survey. Follow-up ground

magnetics and horizontal loop E.M. better defined an anomaly

which had been previously drilled by Canico.

The Canico drill hole is reported (by Keevil) to

contain a section of barren graphitic slates/interflow sediments

within mafic flows, although none of the Canico data were filed

for assessment.

The Hollinger-Esso claims were staked in December 1980,

with magnetic (G-816, proton) and electromagnetic (VLF) surveys

having been previously filed on the property. The results of

those surveys are integrated into the geological background of

this report.

GENERAL GEOLOGY:

The regional picture of the Timmins geology is

articulated well by Pyke (1982) who subdivides the rocks into

a lower Komatiitic - mafic calc-alkaline - felsic calc-alkaline

with iron formation sequence designated as the Deloro Group, and

and upper Komatiitic - Mg-tholeiite - Fe-tholeiite - felsic

calc-alkaline sequence called the Tisdale Group {see Figures l

and 2).

A more local terminology, utilized by the mines of the

area and described by Ferguson (1968), subdivides the Upper

(Tisdale) Group into the Northern, Mcintyre, Central and Vipond

Series overlain by the felsic, calc-alkaline Krist fragmental.

A sequence of previously designated ultramafic intrusives, the

t t t t ri ri/f ^ t t t * t f tt t t t ^4 t tv t t t t t t tttttttAttttttt

LEGEND

MIDDLE PRECAMBRIAN

L^.g Cobalt Formationgreywacke. arkose, argillite. conglomerate

unconformity

EARLY PRECAMBRIAN

\ssBaS\ D iabase *Intrusive Contact

l/./J Granitic intrusive rocks. Intrusive Contact

QVyj Ultramafic intrusive rocks f—-- I ntrusive Contact [ '.' '. j Sediments (domtnantly lurbidites)

]f ^ Iron formation

fcvvj Felsic to intermediate volcanics

l j Mafic volcanics

|| Ultramafic volcanics

* Some diabase dikes are Middle to Late Precambrian age

* Location of gold mines (present and past producers)

^ Fault

Anticlinal axis

Synclinal axis

l

LO

l

Figure f Geological sketch map of the Timmins area.

...after Pyke (1981) pg.2

' x^.-^^^^fpf' v'-' b 'riA^^^^lJ^Tlli.-vttfe^nv' ' 'j

VII

VI

V

IV

III

II

LEGEND

Porcupine group

a U pperformat ions

b Lowe Tformations

Tisdale group

Upper meCavolcanlc format Ion

Middle metavolcanic formation

Lower metavolcanic formation

Deloro group

Upper metavolcanic formation

Middle metavolcanic formation

Lower metavolcanic format ion

8TMBOL8

Geological boundary

Fault

Anticlinal axil

Synclinal axis

Figure 2—Distribution of stratigraphic units in the Timmins area.

...after Pyke (1981) pg-3

- 5 -

Northern Series, and part of the Mcintyre Series (the 95 Flow

portion) define the predominately Komatiitic base of the

Tisdale Group, followed by magnesian tholeiitic rocks of the

upper Mcintyre Series (55 Flow) and the Central Series. The

99 Flow at the base of the Vipond Series marks the onset of

iron tholeiitic rocks.

The northern ten claims of the Tisdale #1 property

span the upper part of the Komatiitic sequence and most of the

magnesian tholeiitic rocks of the Tisdale Group.

Regionally, the Tisdale #1 property is located in a

structurally complex area between two distant domal features -

the Pamour Dome to the north and the Shaw Dome to the south.

The westward extension of a major synformal axis, outlined by

the Blake River volcanics in the Kirkland Lake Area, plots north

of the Tisdale property, although its precise location is

unknown.

Of more local focus, the Tisdale #1 property lies on

the north limb of the isoclinal, North Tisdale Anticline. Units

on the property dip in a southerly direction and top north.

Fault structures present in the North Tisdale area

appear to mainly reflect the north-northwesterly and northwesterly

style Burrows-Benedict and Montreal River Systems, although no

specific offsets can be delimited on the property.

Economically, the Tisdale #1 property covers a portion

of the stratigraphy similar to the settings for most of the major

deposits in South Tisdale Township. A lack of exposure, however,

in combination with stratigraphic elements not easily detected by

geophysical means (i.e. presence of porphyry, folding, dilation),

hampers evaluation of the claims. Further, the ability to establish

targets via overburden drilling is restricted by the presence of

esker and glaciolacustrine deposits.

TABLE OF FORMATIONS:

An abbreviated stratigraphic succession covering the

Deloro and Tisdale Group rocks follows, with aside references to

the local mine terminology.

- 6 -

TABLE OF FORMATIONS

PLEISTOCENE and RECENT - esker and glaciolacustrinedeposits of the Tisdale esker complex and the (Lake) Barlow-Ojibway formation

--- great unconformity-

PRECAMBRIAN

ARCHEAN

- faulting and diabase intrusion - (may locally be synchronous)

- folding, carbonitization, porphyry intrusion - (precise and sometimes relative timing unknown, although certain carbonate units appear crudely stratabound)

Tisdale Group

Calc-alkaline felsic volcanics

Fe-tholeiite suite

Mg-tholeiite suite

Slr-j

Komatiitic volcanicsen ci• 5 8 ^i a

•H ffi-P T3

ft

Krist fragmental

Vipond Series

Central Series C16 Flow CIS Flow C14 Flow

Mcintyre Series 55 Flow

Mcintyre Series 95 Flow

Northern Series N63 pillow lava N63 Dacite

Deloro Group

Felsic calc-alkaline volcanicswith oxide iron formation (older) andsulphide iron formation (younger) near top of sequence

Mafic calc-alkaline volcanics

Komatiitic volcanics

- 7 -

DESCRIPTION OF UNITS:

The only bedrock exposed on the property occurs on

Claim 594789 circa line 19E at 10+OOm North. The exposure

is low-lying in the spruce, spruce-alder swamp, and is interpreted

to be part of the 55 Flow system (i.e. Mg-tholeiite).

Most of the outcrop is medium grained, moderately soft,

grey green in colour, and weathers pale buff to brownish. The

rock is essentially composed of plagioclase, tremolite/actinolite,

hornblende and chlorite, with minor accessory quartz in l-2mm

grains. The rock exhibits a fine felted texture (locally appears

finely sheared) from the presence of tremolite/actinolite, and

contains assorted coarser grains of plagioclase and dark green

hornblende. Near the eastern end of the outcrop there are

scattered, tiny, sometimes rusted vesicles, along with trace

amounts of pyrite.

The southeast margin of the outcrop is cut by a partially

exposed flow-top breccia that is a rather homogenous mixture of

mafic fragments, with rare siliceous fragments and small bun-

shaped pillows. The contact of the breccia zone, although

irregular, averages 60O - the zone dips south, but tops north.

It is not expected that the flow-top breccia represents the top

of the adjacent and stratigraphically lower 95 Flow system.

The majority of the outcrop is also fractured in two

directions (Azimuths 15O and 75O ), such that the exposure is

blocky in appearance.

By integrating the geophysical results with the outcrop

exposures, drill-hole geology available, and the stratigraphic

thicknesses proposed by Ferguson (1968)

: geophysical anomaly A appears to represent the

carbonaceous tuff/argillite at the 95 Flow-Northern Series contact;

: anomaly B is suggested to follow the carbonaceous tuffs

along the upper part of the 55 Flow, and

: anomaly C is interpreted to outline the top of the

Central Series, pillowed Mg-tholeiites.

- 8 -

Considering that most of the stratigraphic sections

presented by Ferguson (1968) indicate that the 95 and 55 Flows

are of near equal thickness, the contact between the two systems

is arbitrarily placed midway between the two electromagnetic

anomalies {A and B) with only minor input from the total field

magnetics.

Thus, the claims are interpreted to be underlain by

mainly pillowed, amygdaloidal Mg-tholeiites of the Central Series,

Mg-tholeiites and carbonaceous tuffs of the 55 Flow system, and

Komatiitic volcanics with carbonaceous horizons of the 95 Flow-

Northern Series rocks.

Of note is the location of the Canico drill hole

proposed by Keevil (assessment files, Resident Geologist's Office),

which does not appear to have tested any of the geophysical

anomalies outlined.

CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS:

The Tisdale #1 property is underlain by an important

sequence of rocks which, at this point, yield little information

towards defining a target that has not previously been tested.

To that end, an induced polarization survey will be undertaken

shortly.

Dale R. Alexander

- 9 -

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ferguson, 1968

S.A.Geology and Ore Deposits of Tisdale Township, District of Cochrane; Ontario Department of Mines Geological Report 58, 177p. Accompanied by Map 2075, Scale I'^IOOO', 12 Charts.

Lee, Hulbert A.1979: Northern Ontario Engineering Geology Terrain

Study, Data Base Map, Pamour. Ontario Geological Survey, Map 5026, Scale 1:100 000.

Pyke, D.R. 1981:

1982

Relationship of Gold Mineralization to Stratigraphy and Structure in Timmins and Surrounding Area; P.1-15 in Genesis of Archean, Volcanic-Hosted Gold Deposits, Symposium Held at the University of Waterloo, March 7, 1980, O.G.S. MP97, 175p.

Geology of the Timmins Area, District of Cochrane; Ontario Geological Survey Report 219, 141p. Accompanied by Map 2455, Scale 1:50 000, 3 Charts, and l Sheet Microfiche.

Assessment files, Resident Geologist's Office,

In-house files, Hollinger Argus Limited.

42A11SW0239 2.7155 TISDALE S(Z)(Z)

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File No J?. 7/S5

TYPE OF SURVEY

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

GEOPHYSICAL

GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

Signature of Assessor

Date

Report of Work

Ontar s

al, Geological, Geochemxal and Exosnditures)

4-

The Mining Act

Instructions: — Please type or print.— l* number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: — Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

— Do not use shaded areas below.IT vi.- o-

Geological ^^ ^

Hollinger Argus Limited

[Township or Area

_____Tisdale Township!ProsDECtor's Licence No.

A-20822

P.O. Box 320, TIMMINS, Ontario P4N 7E2

Hollinger Argus Limited•;rov; of Author (of Geo Technical report)

^Date of Survey (from &1 to) !Total Miles of line Cut07 10 81 !03 07 84 i 16.033 kmsDay ! Mo. ! -r r. i Day l Mo. l Yr. | J-u . u J J jvuio

Dale R. Alexander, c/o Hollinger Argus Limited•-...i * j H-.'i.iiJt's;;;i) Der Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

i Geophysical i ^ ^Claim

r o* i ;r~\ s urvey: | c ,

irc'UOes line cutting) . Magnetometer

- - ^M-nic^onr, ^vey: . " *",c

- Other LI:!.: : "'U ruys Hoi t a chl

oeo.oo.c,, /fL-26-

\ G eochemicai

• :;: ' ^ r'"- - ' - : Days pe-

C'v-"' ••'ir 1 'evi:se S'CJP - E lectromagnet c..-,, -'r- -r ;otat(s) nere

- Magnetometer

' - Ra a ,omev,c ;

: - Otner1i l Geological jj ;\ 1 Geochemical

•\'f.--oi '.-.r: C .'t'aits i Days pei ; Claim

Note: Soi;Ciai DroviSions ElectromagneticCT-MitS do nOl apply J —————————;j Airborne Surveys. Magnetometer

1 Radiometric

~. v:^r..huire* (excludes Dower stripping}Vi.; '--c* in or*. ri'MormeJ

" ' -- ' " : ' 1 ' ; :' - ' L"' ' :fr ' r

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits Total

^otal Expenditures Days Credits

i 3 -r- 15 =

: . ns*- j ? - 'Or u ; TO:;I; O3vr. Credits mav DB apportioned at the claim hoider's

"••o'CL, 5 f ter number ot oays credits per claim selected .-. cu'j- ir.', Jt rirint.

CJate Recorded Hofaer or Agent (Signature)

j Aug. 15, 1984 U ^ . ('

Mining ClaimPrefix ! Number

P 594781

. 594782

594783

594784

594785

594789

594790

594791

594792

594793

i!

i-i r. C 1 1 V E D

"i ; ': ' ! r) 1984

,.^ ii.....-.-. :,..uiiji,

Expend. Days Cr.

-?e26-

23-

2^2^-

2-9-

-20-

20-

-20-

2-0-

i

-ieci

B)rat. M

3

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr.lDate Recorded Recorded *"? 1

l/ f.^f\ \~^4sL*/ /x 1 f 0*7li f) U Date Approved as Recorded l jf*"' J-~ ^^ —\— t S*v XT f ' *^ i ff f ^ _

Mining ClaimPrefix Numoer

i (j^ ajfcii L ±t

E C (p R D E D! AMOO-i 1DQ/IHUD 6 OOH

iptNo. ^ CV.

i

PORCUPINE MINIMS OIViaoH

i 5 -k i i*' k riE

P. M9|lp|l!jI2| Ij2!3jf jrnC.

j

Expend. Days Cr.

JLJL

1;J—

Total number of mining claims covered by this -i r\report of worK.

^^ fMining R eaGr ae f /y /f .

JP?M f/ rf/^~^ faffs^J&for

^t-^^pU^y-^ ^-~^T^"CsrtificaTior, ^' -if^nn Report of V.ork ^ ( S ( f

i no-,,.-, ,-pr- :. tn-" l r.av-- 3 r-"-.nn-i .T -i ^r'n"^!p K-iowiedfiP o* tn--' tacts set forth m tne Reoort of Work annexWfTereto. navinq Bii/forrped trie work

Dale R. Alexander,/ c/o Hollinger Argus Limited, _______Date Certified Ce/Sjfied oy t&iflnaXTraP.O.Box 320, Timmins, Ont. ' A "Aug.15,1984

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

FUe.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Sui

Township o

Claim Hold

Survey Con Author of 1 Address of Covering D(

Total Miles

SPECIAL

•vey(s)r Area

er(s)Box

ipany

leport

GeologicalTisdale Township

Hollinger Argus Limited320, Timmins, Ontario P4N 7E2Hollinger Argus LimitedDale R. Alexander

Author c /o Hollinger Argus Limited

ites of Surv

of Line Cut

. PROVISICCREDITS REQUEST

Py Oct. 7, 1981 - July 3, 1984(linecutting to office)

16.033 kms.

|NS. fED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

AIRBORNE CREDITSMagnetome

nATR- At

Res. Geol.

ter

ig.l5 P 19

DAYS Geophysical

—Rlertrnmagnptir

—Maprnprnrrvt/T

—p-jHmmptrir

-Oth^r

^l-l 20fienlngiral

n^nrhprniral

(Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

ilectromagt(enter t

84 fUCMA

ictir RaHjr.pnefi'-ays per claim)

.TTTRF- <HL^JJL K. . (JUJtfnAuthor of Report or Agent

rfi

Oualifirations N <

Previous SurveysFile No. Type Date Claim Holder

[MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED

List numerically

(prefix) (number)

P. 594781

594782

594783

594784

594785

594789

594790

594791

594792

594793

^r""

"" ^/V?n.......................................................t-.j^..

S':p y -

TOTAITTA?MS 10

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations ———————————————————————————Number of Readings —

Station interval ^—.^^^—^^————————————^^———-—Line spacing.———.—

Profile scale—^^—^^—————————^—-————^—-——-—-.^^-————^^——^—

Contour interval.

Instrument —

W ZG

u

Accuracy — Scale constant.

Diurnal correction method.

Base Station check-in interval (hours).

Base Station location and value ^—^—

Instrument

Coil configuration^-4

liH U WJ

Coil separation ——^—^—————^^^-———^^—-—————————.——————^^^—^^^——.^———.——

Accuracy —^.^———————————^—^--—.-———^^^^^^-—^^——.^^——-—————.^^.^^^^....^.^^—^

Method: Q Fixed transmitter O Shoot back d In line CD Parallel line

Frequency—————^—————————^—(specify V.L.F. station)

Parameters measured.

Instrument

Scale constant

Corrections made. >

O

H <N5 ^ocuQ u;U

a Z

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument ,.^-^—^^—^—..^^^—^^^—————.^——-—.^———^^^^^^—-.^^^—— Method D Time Domain D Frequency Domain

Parameters - On time ___________________________ Frequency ____

— Off time ___________________________ Range ————————

— Delay time.

Integration time.

Power.

Electrode array —

Electrode spacing .

: of electrode

1984 09 17 Your File: 334 Our File: 2.7155

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTloBTins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

Me have received reports and naps for a Geological Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) oi Mining CIalas P 594781 et al 1n the Township of Tisdale.

This Material trill be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

Yours sincerely*

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: (416)965-6918

A.Barr:sc

cc: Hollinger Argus P.O. Box 320 Timmins, Ontario P4N 7E2 Attn: Dale R. Alexander.

HOLLINGER MINES LIMITEDTIMMINS ONTARIO-TELEPHONE: { 7O5) 264-1313P4N 7E2

August 15, 1984.

Mr. Bruce Hanley,Mining Recorder, Porcupine Division,Ministry of Natural Resources,60 Wilson Avenue,TIMMINS, Ontario.P4N 2S7

Dear Bruce:

Attached is a 'Report of Work' for a geological survey covering ten claims in Tisdale Township.

Hollinger Argus Limited would like to transfer the linecutting credit {previously filed with the geophysical surveys) to the geological survey currently being filed. This would facilitate filing induced polarization and resistivity surveys on the claim group.

shortly.The geophysical surveys will get under way

The claims are on extension until the end of August, 1984.

I trust that all is in order, and I thank you for your co-operation.

Sincerely,

Dale R. Alexander, Exploration Geologist.

Encl.PORCUPINE M:N:;;C

P i S S IAU6 2 l fcS*

HOLLINGER ARGUS LIMITED p Q BOX 32o JELEPHONE: ^ 264. ]3 , 3TIMMINS. ONTARIO P4N 7E2

September 6, 1984.

Mr. E.F. Anderson,Director, Lands Administration Branch,Ministry of Natural Resources,Whitney Block, Room 6450,Queen's Park,TORONTO, Ontario.M7A 1W3

Dear Mr. Anderson:

Re: 10 claims - Tisdale Township, P.594781-785, P.594789-793

Enclosed you will find duplicate copies of a report

of a Geological Survey for our Tisdale #1 group which is in

Tisdale Township. Also enclosed is a copy of the Report of

Work which was filed with the Mining Recorder of the Porcupine

Mining Division in Timmins.

Sincerely,

!' ; : C : : l V ; " r) LU^

: P^J W. H. King,Records Officer

1 - J i'!

Encls.

V7T-

\\

\

(T(T

crr•TcT

V\

soo r

O3CX)

.O

0"

l i

MU

RP

HY

TW

PTI

SD

ALE

Jac

kpin

e,

Po

pla

rre

fore

sted

with

Ja

ckpi

ne

594

792

5 9

4 7

9 \

3

part

ly

cle

are

d

ara

v e

lS

pru

ceJa

ckp

ine

,

Popla

r.Dr

i l

Hole

T

IS.-

2-I

-84

L.

12

3m.

, 0V

24

m. :

. G

ale

- al

kalin

e fe

lsic

vo

ican

ics

Sp

ra

ce

, A

Id e

r s

Inte

rflo

w

tuffs/

sedim

ents

schi

stos

ity

dire

ctio

n

of

top

ri s^

topo

gra

phic

fe

atur

e

drill

hol

e- p

roje

cted

up

dip

ov

er

are

a

HULL

ING

EB A

RGUS

LIM

IIED

TI

MM

INS

l CO

N.

CON.

Vi

CON.

V

42A11SW0239 2.7155 TISDALE

20

13

o c

~ ;e