TIMSS Survey

68
Highlights from PIRLS and TIMSS 2011 Jack Buckley National Center for Education Statistics Washington, DC December 11, 2012

Transcript of TIMSS Survey

Page 1: TIMSS Survey

Highlights from PIRLS and TIMSS 2011

Jack Buckley

National Center for Education Statistics

Washington, DC

December 11, 2012

Page 2: TIMSS Survey

OverviewWhat are PIRLS and TIMSS and which education

systems participate in them?

How are U.S. students performing compared to their international peers in: 4th-grade reading? 4th- and 8th-grade mathematics? 4th- and 8th-grade science?

How are students performing in participating U.S. states?

2

Page 3: TIMSS Survey

What are…?

3

• Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS)

• 4th-grade reading assessment

* In 1999, no grade 4 assessment.

TIMSSPIRLS

2001 2006 2011

1995 1999* 2003 2007 2011

• Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)

• 4th- and 8th-grade mathematics and science assessment

• Developed by the TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center at Boston College, under contract to the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)

Page 4: TIMSS Survey

PIRLS participating education systems (in 4th grade)

4

26 education systems

201132 education systems53 education systems

Page 5: TIMSS Survey

5

TIMSS participating education systems (in either/both grades)

44 education systems37 education systems47 education systems57 education systems74 education systems

2011

Page 6: TIMSS Survey

Participating states

6

• 9 states participated as separate entities to obtain scores in PIRLS or TIMSS or both

• Each participated as part of the nation and on its own• NCES funded participation at grade 8 of all states except Florida as

part of a study to statistically link NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) and TIMSS (Florida received other Education Department funding)

PIRLS TIMSS grade 4 TIMSS grade 8

Florida FloridaNorth Carolina

FloridaNorth CarolinaAlabamaCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutIndianaMassachusettsMinnesota

Page 7: TIMSS Survey

U.S. national sample size

4th gradeSchools: 370

Students: 12,726

4th grade Schools: 369

Students: 12,569

8th gradeSchools: 501

Students: 10,477

7

TIMSSPIRLS

Page 8: TIMSS Survey

U.S. state sample sizes(public schools only)

4th grade(FL)

Schools: 77

Students: 2,598

4th grade (FL, NC)

Schools: 46 – 77

Students:

1,792 – 2,661

8th grade(AL, CA, CO, CT, FL, IN, MA, MN, NC)

Schools: 53 – 82

Students:

1,712 – 2,614

8

TIMSSPIRLS

Page 9: TIMSS Survey

READING

Page 10: TIMSS Survey

PIRLS

Definition The ability to understand and use those written language forms required by society and/or valued by the individual. Young readers can construct meaning from a variety of texts. They read to learn, to participate in communities of readers in school and everyday life, and for enjoyment.

Content Literary and informational texts

Cognitive dimensions Focus on and retrieve Make straightforward inferencesInterpret and integrateExamine and evaluate

10

PIRLS 2011 framework

Page 11: TIMSS Survey

What is on the PIRLS assessment?

11

Percentage of 4th-graders answering correctly:U.S.: 90%Int’l Avg.: 89%

Page 12: TIMSS Survey

What is on the PIRLS assessment?

12

Percentage of 4th-graders answering correctly:U.S.: 42%Int’l Avg.: 29%

Page 13: TIMSS Survey

13

U.S. average score (556) higher than the PIRLS scale average (500)

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 14: TIMSS Survey

14

U.S. average score (556) lower than in 5 education systems

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 15: TIMSS Survey

15

U.S. average (556) not measurably different than in 7 education systems

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 16: TIMSS Survey

16

U.S. average score (556) higher than in 40 education systems

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 17: TIMSS Survey

17

Average reading scores of 4th-grade students increased from 2006 to 2011 in 13

education systems, including the U.S.

*p < .05. Change in average scores is significant.NOTE: Education systems ordered according to average reading score in 2011.

Change in average score

Hong Kong-CHN

Singapore

UNITED STATES

Denmark

Chinese Taipei-CHN

England-GBR

Slovenia

Poland

Norway

Georgia

Trinidad and Tobago

Iran, Islamic Rep. of

Indonesia

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

7*

9*

16*

8*

18*

12*

9*

6*

9*

17*

35*

36*

24*

Page 18: TIMSS Survey

Alberta-CAN

Sweden

Italy

Germany

Hungary

Bulgaria

Austria

Lithuania

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

-12*

-8*

-10*

-7*

-12*

-15*

-9*

-9*

Change in average score

18

Average reading scores of 4th-grade students decreased from 2006 to 2011 in 8

education systems

*p < .05. Change in average scores is significant.NOTE: Education systems ordered according to average reading score in 2011.

Page 19: TIMSS Survey

PIRLS international reading benchmarks

19

Grade 4Advanced (625) Students can interpret figurative language, distinguish and

interpret complex information from different parts of text, and integrate ideas across text to provide interpretations about characters’ feelings and behaviors.

High (550) Students can recognize some textual features, make inferences on the basis of abstract or embedded information, and integrate information to recognize main ideas and provide explanations.

Intermediate (475) Students can identify central events, make straightforward inferences from the text, and begin to make connections across parts of the text.

Low (400) Students can retrieve explicitly stated details from literary and informational texts.

Page 20: TIMSS Survey

Percentages of U.S. 4th-grade students reaching PIRLS reading benchmarks were higher than international medians in 2011

Low Intermediate High Advanced0

102030405060708090

100 98

86

56

17

95

80

44

8

United StatesInternational median

Benchmark

Percent

20

NOTE: All U.S. percentages are significantly higher than the corresponding PIRLS international median at the .05 level of statistical significance.

Page 21: TIMSS Survey

NOTE: Education systems with lower percentages of students reaching the Advanced benchmark than the percentage of U.S. students reaching the Advanced benchmark are not included in figure.

21

Two systems had higher percentages of 4th-grade students reaching Advanced than the U.S.

Higher than U.S. (p < .05)

Not measurably different than U.S. (p < .05)

Singapore

Florida-USA

Russian Federation

Northern Ireland-GBR

Finland

England-GBR

Hong Kong-CHN

UNITED STATES

Ireland

Ontario-CAN

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

24

22

19

19

18

18

18

17

16

15

Percentage reaching Advanced benchmark

Page 22: TIMSS Survey

MATHEMATICS

Page 23: TIMSS Survey

TIMSS 2011 mathematics framework

23

TIMSS mathematicsContent dimensions

Grade 4 Number Geometric Shapes and Measures Data Display

Grade 8NumberAlgebraGeometryData and Chance

Cognitive dimensions

KnowingApplyingReasoning

Page 24: TIMSS Survey

24

GRADE 4

Percentage of 4th-graders answering correctly:U.S.: 80%Int’l Avg.: 54%

What is on the TIMSS mathematics assessment?

Page 25: TIMSS Survey

What is on the TIMSS mathematics assessment?

25

GRADE 4

Percentage of 4th-graders answering correctly:U.S.: 76%Int’l Avg.: 65%

Page 26: TIMSS Survey

26

GRADE 8

What is on the TIMSS mathematics assessment?

GRADE 8

Percentage of 8th-graders answering correctly:U.S.: 87%Int’l Avg.: 70%

Page 27: TIMSS Survey

27

GRADE 8

What is on the TIMSS mathematics assessment?

Percentage of 8th-graders answering correctly:U.S.: 66%Int’l Avg.: 45%

Page 28: TIMSS Survey

28

U.S. average score (541) higher than the TIMSS scale average (500)

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 29: TIMSS Survey

29

U.S. average score (541) lower than in 8 education systems

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 30: TIMSS Survey

30

U.S. average (541) not measurably different than in 6 education systems

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 31: TIMSS Survey

31

U.S. average score (541) higher than in 42 education systems

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 32: TIMSS Survey

32

U.S. average score (509) higher than the TIMSS scale average (500)

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 33: TIMSS Survey

33

U.S. average score (509) lower than in 11 education systems

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 34: TIMSS Survey

34

U.S. average (509) not measurably different than in 12 education systems

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 35: TIMSS Survey

35

U.S. average score (509) higher than in 32 education systems

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 36: TIMSS Survey

36

Average mathematics scores of 4th-grade students increased from 2007 to 2011 in 12

education systems, including the U.S.

*p < .05. Change in average scores is significant.NOTE: Education systems ordered according to average mathematics score in 2011.

Chinese Taipei-CHN

Japan

UNITED STATES

Denmark

Quebec-CAN

Slovenia

Czech Republic

Norway

Dubai-UAE

Georgia

Iran, Islamic Rep. of

Tunisia

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

15*

17*

12*

14*

14*

11*

24*

22*

24*

12*

28*

32*

Change in average score

Page 37: TIMSS Survey

Average mathematics scores of 8th-grade students increased from 2007 to 2011 in 10

education systems

37

*p < .05. Change in average scores is significant.NOTE: Education systems ordered according to average mathematics score in 2011.

Korea, Rep. of

Singapore

Chinese Taipei-CHN

Russian Federation

UNITED STATES

Italy

Ukraine

Dubai-UAE

Georgia

Bahrain

Palestinian Nat'l Auth

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

16*

18*

11*

27*

1

19*

17*

17*

22*

11*

37*

Change in average score

Page 38: TIMSS Survey

38

*p < .05. Change in average scores is significant.NOTE: Education systems ordered according to average mathematics score in 2011.

Average mathematics scores of 8th-grade students decreased from 2007 to 2011 in 6

education systems

Hungary

Sweden

Malaysia

Thailand

Jordan

Syrian Arab Republic

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20

-12*

-7*

-34*

-14*

-21*

-15*

Change in average score

Page 39: TIMSS Survey

TIMSS international mathematics benchmarks

Grade 4 Grade 8

Advanced (625) Students can apply their understanding and knowledge in a variety of relatively complex situations and explain their reasoning.

Students can reason with information, draw conclusions, make generalizations, and solve linear equations.

High (550) Students can apply their knowledge and understanding to solve problems.

Students can apply their understanding and knowledge in a variety of relatively complex situations.

Intermediate (475)

Students can apply basic mathematical knowledge in straightforward situations.

Students can apply basic mathematical knowledge in straightforward situations.

Low (400) Students have some basic mathematical knowledge.

Students have some knowledge of whole numbers and decimals, operations, and basic graphs.

39

Page 40: TIMSS Survey

Percentages of U.S. 4th-graders reaching TIMSS mathematics benchmarks were

higher than international medians in 2011

Low Intermediate High Advanced0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100 96

81

47

13

90

69

28

4

United StatesInternational median

Benchmark

Percent at or above

40

NOTE: All U.S. percentages are significantly higher than the corresponding TIMSS international median at the .05 level of statistical significance.

Page 41: TIMSS Survey

Higher than U.S. (p < .05)

Not measurably different than U.S. (p < .05)

NOTE: Education systems with lower percentages of students reaching the Advanced benchmark than the percentage of U.S. students reaching the Advanced benchmark are not included in figure.

41

Seven systems had higher percentages of 4th-grade students reaching Advanced than the U.S.

Finland

UNITED STATES

Russian Federation

Florida-USA

North Carolina-USA

England-GBR

Northern Ireland-GBR

Japan

Chinese Taipei-CHN

Hong Kong-CHN

Korea, Rep. of

Singapore

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

12

13

13

14

16

18

24

30

34

37

39

43

Percentage reaching Advanced benchmark

Page 42: TIMSS Survey

Low Intermediate High Advanced0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10092

68

30

7

75

46

17

3

United StatesInternational median

Benchmark

Percent at or above

42

NOTE: All U.S. percentages are significantly higher than the corresponding TIMSS international median at the .05 level of statistical significance.

Percentages of U.S. 8th-graders reaching TIMSS mathematics benchmarks were

higher than international medians in 2011

Page 43: TIMSS Survey

NOTE: Education systems with lower percentages of students reaching the Advanced benchmark than the percentage of U.S. students reaching the Advanced benchmark are not included in figure.

43

Eleven systems had higher percentages of 8th-graders reaching Advanced than the U.S.

Higher than U.S. (p < .05)

Not measurably different than U.S. (p < .05)

California-USADubai-UAE

New ZealandLithuaniaRomania

Quebec-CAN UNITED STATES

Indiana-USATurkey

HungaryColorado-USA

Florida-USAEngland-GBR

AustraliaConnecticut-USA

IsraelMinnesota-USA

North Carolina-USARussian Federation

Massachusetts-USAJapan

Hong Kong-CHNKorea, Rep. of

SingaporeChinese Taipei-CHN

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

555556

777

8888

910

1213

1414

1927

344748

49

Percentage reaching Advanced benchmark

Page 44: TIMSS Survey

SCIENCE

Page 45: TIMSS Survey

TIMSS 2011 science framework

45

TIMSS science

Content dimensions Grade 4Earth scienceLife sciencePhysical science

Grade 8BiologyChemistryEarth sciencePhysics

Cognitive dimensions

KnowingApplyingReasoning

Page 46: TIMSS Survey

What is on the TIMSS science assessment?

46

GRADE 4 Percentage of 4th-

graders answering correctly:U.S.: 96%Int’l Avg.: 83%

Page 47: TIMSS Survey

What is on the TIMSS science assessment?

47

GRADE 4

Percentage of 4th-graders answering correctly:U.S.: 90%Int’l Avg.: 73%

Page 48: TIMSS Survey

What is on the TIMSS science assessment?

48

GRADE 8

Percentage of 8th-graders answering correctly:U.S.: 28%Int’l Avg.: 27%

Page 49: TIMSS Survey

What is on the TIMSS science assessment?

49

GRADE 8

Percentage of 8th-graders answering correctly:U.S.: 76%Int’l Avg.: 61%

Page 50: TIMSS Survey

U.S. average score (544) higher than the TIMSS scale average (500)

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

50

Page 51: TIMSS Survey

51

U.S. average score (544) lower than in 6 education systems

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 52: TIMSS Survey

52

U.S. average (544) not measurably different than in 3 education systems

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 53: TIMSS Survey

53

U.S. average score (544) higher than in 47 education systems

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 54: TIMSS Survey

54

U.S. average score (525) higher than the TIMSS scale average (500)

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 55: TIMSS Survey

55

U.S. average score (525) lower than in 12 education systems

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 56: TIMSS Survey

56

U.S. average (525) not measurably different than in 10 education systems

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 57: TIMSS Survey

57

U.S. average score (525) higher than in 33 education systems

Higher than U.S.

Not measurably different than U.S.

Lower than U.S.

Page 58: TIMSS Survey

58

*p < .05. Change in average scores is significant.NOTE: Education systems ordered according to average science score in 2011.

Average science scores of 4th-grade students increased from 2007 to 2011 in 9

education systemsJapan

UNITED STATES

Czech Republic

Sweden

Netherlands

Denmark

Norway

Georgia

Iran, Islamic Rep. of

Tunisia

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

11*

5

21*

9*

8*

11*

17*

37*

17*

27*

Change in average score

Page 59: TIMSS Survey

59

*p < .05. Change in average scores is significant.NOTE: Education systems ordered according to average science score in 2011.

Average science scores of 4th-grade students decreased from 2007 to 2011 in 5

education systems

Hong Kong-CHN

England-GBR

Italy

Australia

New Zealand

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

-19*

-13*

-11*

-12*

-7*

Change in average score

Page 60: TIMSS Survey

60

*p < .05. Change in average scores is significant.NOTE: Education systems ordered according to average science score in 2011.

Average science scores of 8th-grade students increased from 2007 to 2011 in 9

education systems

Singapore

Korea, Rep. of

Minnesota-USA

Russian Federation

UNITED STATES

Quebec-CAN

Ukraine

Norway

Iran, Islamic Rep. of

Palestinian Nat'l Auth

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

23*

7*

15*

13*

5

13*

16*

8*

15*

16*

Change in average score

Page 61: TIMSS Survey

61

*p < .05. Change in average scores is significant.NOTE: Education systems ordered according to average science score in 2011.

Average science scores of 8th-grade students decreased from 2007 to 2011 in 7

education systems

Hungary

Bahrain

Thailand

Jordan

Malaysia

Syrian Arab Republic

Indonesia

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10

-17*

-15*

-20*

-33*

-44*

-26*

-21*

Change in average score

Page 62: TIMSS Survey

TIMSS international science benchmarks

62

Grade 4 Grade 8Advanced (625) Students can apply knowledge

and understanding of scientific processes and relationships and show some knowledge of the process of scientific inquiry.

Students communicate an understanding of complex and abstract concepts in biology, chemistry, physics, and earth science.

High (550) Students apply their knowledge and understanding of the sciences to explain phenomena in everyday and abstract contexts.

Students demonstrate understanding of concepts related to science cycles, systems, and principles.

Intermediate (475)

Students have basic knowledge and understanding of practical situations in the sciences.

Students recognize and apply their understanding of basic scientific knowledge in various contexts.

Low (400) Students have some elementary knowledge of life science and physical science.

Students can recognize some basic facts from the life and physical sciences.

Page 63: TIMSS Survey

Low Intermediate High Advanced0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100 96

81

49

15

92

72

32

5

United StatesInternational median

Benchmark

Percent at or above

63

NOTE: All U.S. percentages are significantly higher than the corresponding TIMSS international median at the .05 level of statistical significance.

Percentages of U.S. 4th-graders reaching TIMSS science benchmarks were higher

than international medians in 2011

Page 64: TIMSS Survey

NOTE: Education systems with lower percentages of students reaching the Advanced benchmark than the percentage of U.S. students reaching the Advanced benchmark are not included in figure.

64

Higher than U.S. (p < .05)

Not measurably different than U.S. (p < .05)

Three systems had higher percentages of 4th-grade students reaching Advanced than the U.S.

Singapore

Korea, Rep. of

Finland

Russian Federation

Chinese Taipei-CHN

UNITED STATES

Japan

Florida-USA

Hungary

North Carolina-USA

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

33

29

20

16

15

15

14

14

13

12

Percentage reaching Advanced benchmark

Page 65: TIMSS Survey

Low Intermediate High Advanced0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10093

73

40

10

79

52

21

4

United StatesInternational median

Benchmark

Percent at or above

65

Percentages of U.S. 8th-graders reaching TIMSS science benchmarks were higher

than international medians in 2011

NOTE: All U.S. percentages are significantly higher than the corresponding TIMSS international median at the .05 level of statistical significance.

Page 66: TIMSS Survey

NOTE: Education systems with lower percentages of students reaching the Advanced benchmark than the percentage of U.S. students reaching the Advanced benchmark are not included in figure. 66

Higher than U.S. (p < .05)

Not measurably different than U.S. (p < .05)

Twelve systems had higher percentages of 8th-graders reaching Advanced than the U.S.

Singapore

Massachusetts-USA

Chinese Taipei-CHN

Korea, Rep. of

Japan

Minnesota-USA

Colorado-USA

Connecticut-USA

Russian Federation

England-GBR

Slovenia

Florida-USA

Finland

North Carolina-USA

Alberta-CAN

Israel

Australia

Indiana-USA

UNITED STATES

Hong Kong-GBR

New Zealand

Hungary

Turkey

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

40

24

24

20

18

16

14

14

14

14

13

13

13

12

12

11

11

10

10

9

9

9

8

Percentage reaching Advanced benchmark

Page 67: TIMSS Survey

Summary of change in average U.S. scores over time

67

PIRLS Reading2006-2011

TIMSSMathematics2007-2011

TIMSS Science2007-2011

TIMSSMathematics2007-2011

TIMSSScience2007-2011

Grade 4

Grade 8

Change over time in U.S. average scores was statistically significant.

Change over time in U.S. average scores was not measurably different.

Page 68: TIMSS Survey

For more information

PIRLS at NCES:

http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pirls/

International Data Explorer:

http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pirls/idepirls/

Contact:

Sheila Thompson

NCES

[email protected]

202-502-7425

68

TIMSSPIRLSTIMSS at NCES:

http://nces.ed.gov/timss/

International Data Explorer:

http://nces.ed.gov/timss/idetimss/

Contact:

Stephen Provasnik

NCES

[email protected]

202-502-7480