Time-Lapse Photographic Observations of Morphogenesis in Root
Time lapse observations
-
Upload
mitera-ivf -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
852 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Time lapse observations
Time lapse observations of pre-implantation embryos
Giles Palmer, Mitera ACU, [email protected]
There are no commercial relationships or other activities that might be perceived as a
potential conflict of interest
Time lapse in the IVF Laboratory
• Continuous viewing of embryo development• Embryo monitored from inside incubator• Creates archives of embryo development used to select
embryo(s) for embryo transfer
Embryo selection
• Embryo selection- subjective assessment
• Call for consensus of embryo grading
• Early cleavage, pronuclear morphology & orientation limited
• Trend to reduce multiple births after ART
Embryo selection• Invasive techniques
Euploid selection (PGS) not fulfilled expectationsCGH replacing FISHRCT underway
• Non-invasive techniques-”omics” search for biomarkers: metabolomics-not implemented at present. Promising developments but time consuming/ technically challenging
The (Short) History of Time lapse monitoring
• Payne (1997) Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time lapse cinematography
• Pribenszky (2010) Pregnancy achieved by transfer of a single blastocyst selected by time lapse monitoring
• Wong (2010) Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to blastocyst stage
• Meseguer (2011) The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation
Time lapse 2013
• Primo Vision (Bright field)• Embryoscope (Bright field-self contained incubation) • Eeva (Dark field, automatic embryo prediction software)
Conventional incubator Time lapse microscope Microwell embryo culture dish with the developing embryos
Static observations are misleading!
Fragmentation:•Pribenszky (2010)12% embryos fragmenting89% reabsorbedAverage time for fragments to appear/disappear 9.1 h ( +/- 442) Chance for NOT noticing fragments at bi-daily monitoring: 72% !!!
Blastocyst contractions:
videos
Which embryo would you transfer?
Static observations are misleading!
Ww
26:32 29:52 30:02
35:12 42:02 42:32
Implantation is linked to exact timing events
Event PN appear PN fading* 1st division* 2nd division* 3rd division*
Range (h)
7.8-11.1 Out of range
22.3-25.8
Out of range
24.4-28.2
Out of range
35.3-40.6
Out of range
36.0-41.6
Out of range
100% Implanted
N (%)
15(54%)
13(46%)
23(66%)
12(34%)
23(66%)
12(34%)
13(72%)
5(28%)
19(73%)
7(27%)
0% Implanted
N (%)
60(49%)
62(51%)
55(45%)
67(55%)
57(46%)
67(54%)
43(45%)
52(55%)
45(45%)
56(55%)
Herrero, 2010
5-8cc30-50 min
9-16cc40-70
min
3-4cc10-20min
8-9cc22-24
hrs
4-5cc14-16
hrs
2-3cc10-12
hrs
Interphase 1-2cc
20-26 hrs
Exact timing of interphases
1st cycle 2nd cycle 3rd cycle 4th cycle
Hlinka 2010
Cell CycleCellular organization Nuclear organization and MitosisCell divisionCell synchronicity
Karyokinetics and cytokinetics
Karyokinetics and cytokinetics
Karyokinetics and cytokinetics
Second cell cycle
Third cell cycle
3-4 cell
5-8 cell
t2 t3 t4 t5
cc2 cc3s2
t: exact timet2: time to 2-cellt3: time to 4-cellt4: time to 4-cellt5: time to 5-cell
cc: cell cyclecc2 = t3-t2cc3 = t5-t4
S:synchronys2 = t4-t3
cc2=11,8h s2 = <0.76h
t2=25,6h (24,3-25,8h)t3=37,4h (35,4-37,8h)t4=38h (36,4-38,9h)t5=52,3h (48,8-56,6,h)
Proposed a multivariable model to classify embryos into implantation potential
t5
Hierarchical classificationDiscard?
Exclude?
s2s2
cc2cc2cc2cc2
A+ A- B+ B- C+ C- D+ D- E F
Accept Discard
ExcludeInclude
Within range Outside range
Outside range
Outside range
Within range
Within range
t5
Hierarchical classification Discard?
Exclude?
s2s2
cc2cc2cc2cc2
66%
36%
29%
24%
25%
10%
10%
15%
8% F
Accept Discard
ExcludeInclude
Within range Outside range
Outside range
Outside range
Within range
Within range
Implantation
HDHDGHGDGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
Abnormal cell division & aneuploidy
Time line profile
e
Time line profile
e
eCGH profile- molecular karyotype
3-4 CellsAbnormal cell division & aneuploidy
Time line profile
e
Time line profile
e
e
3-4 Cells
Davies (ESHRE 2012) Delayed cleavage divisions and prolonged transition between 2-4-cell stages identified as aneuploid at 8-cell by array CGHThe timing of first and second divisions were delayed in aneuploidy and more marked in those with multiple aneuploidy2-4 cell transition: euploidy<single aneuploidy<multiple aneuploidy
Basile (2013) Increasing the probability of selecting chromosomally normal embryos by studying their kineticsClassification system based on time parameters relates to selection of euploid embryos Normal embryos A+: 36,3%, A: 33,9%;B+: 32,0%, B:19,5%;C+:14,3%, C:11,5%;D+: 10,0%, D: 9,0%
Campbell (2013) Retrospective analysis of outcomes after IVF using an aneuploidy risk model derived from time-lapse imaging without PGSAneuploidy risk model
Abnormal cell division linked to aneuploidy
The era of morphokinetics
Chen 2013
Conclusions
• Improves knowledge of in vitro embryo development
• Potential to standardize embryo assessment• Easily incorporated into IVF lab• Exclude embryos with direct/ abnormal
cleavage, sub-optimum development, fragmentation, multinucleation
• Improved embryo selection may increase pregnancy rates
Cell CycleNuclear organization and MitosisCellular organization Cell divisionCell synchronicity
Zygotic ClockMaternal to zygotic
Fertilization
Maternal control Zygotic control
Karyokinetics and cytokinetics
Implantation is linked to exact timing events
Herrero, 2010
Event PN appear PN fading* 1st division* 2nd division* 3rd division*
Range (h)
7.8-11.1 Out of range
22.3-25.8
Out of range
24.4-28.2
Out of range
35.3-40.6
Out of range
36.0-41.6
Out of range
100% Implanted
N (%)
15(54%)
13(46%)
23(66%)
12(34%)
23(66%)
12(34%)
13(72%)
5(28%)
19(73%)
7(27%)
0% Implanted
N (%)
60(49%)
62(51%)
55(45%)
67(55%)
57(46%)
67(54%)
43(45%)
52(55%)
45(45%)
56(55%)