Timberlane Regional School District Report Card 2013Timberlane … · 2013. 4. 15. · The most...

Timberlane Regional School District Annual Report Card 2011 Timberlane Regional School District Report Card 2013


To the Timberlane Community,

Following is the first publication of the Timberlane Regional School District’s Report

Card. The Community Relations Committee of the School Board has been working on

this document for over three years and we are proud to present it to you, the community

and primary stakeholders of our schools at Timberlane. Our plan is to annually update

this document.

This effort was done with the goal of compiling all data related to Timberlane into an

easy to read single source of information: our District Report Card (DRC). The DRC will

bring to you a vast amount of information collected from many different sources. You will

find everything from school enrollment numbers to post high school placement of our

young men and women.

This report will be the baseline from which we will work to improve our schools moving

forward. Already, the Timberlane Governance Team (Superintendent of Schools Dr. Earl

Metzler and the School Board) has initiated and begun to install changes in an effort to

fulfill our mission:

The MISSION of the Timberlane Regional School District is to engage all students

in challenging and relevant learning opportunities, emphasizing high aspirations

and personal growth.

One of the largest and most impactful changes is the creation of the new high school

organizational chart, creating four Academic Dean positions and completely restructuring

how the high school functions academically. This change will streamline accountability

and allow our administration and staff to focus on our most important asset, the students.

With this change and many more to come we are very excited about moving forward and

realizing our mission.

If there are any areas of the DRC you feel we did not cover well, or at all, please let us

know by emailing the School Board at [email protected].

Sincerely,

___________________________ ___________________________

Robert Collins Dr. Earl Metzler

School Board Chair Superintendent of Schools

1

mailto:[email protected]


Table of Contents

Enrollment………………………………………………….....…….3

Average Daily Membership………………………………………...6

Equalized Property Valuation………………………………....... 10

School Funding…………………………………………………... 12

Drop Out Rate…………………………………………………..... 14

Education Attainment for Teachers…………………………….. 15

Average Teacher Salary…………………………………........... 17

Student Teacher Ratio…………………………………………... 20

Free/Reduced Lunch…………………………………………….. 22

Cost per Pupil…………………………………………………….. 24

Technology…………………………………………………......... 26

New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP)……. 28

Reading - Grade Level Reports………………………….... 29

Reading - Graduation Class Cohort………………………. 41

Math - Grade Level Reports……………………………..... 45

Math - Graduation Class Cohort………………………...... 57

Science - Grade Level Reports….………………………... 61

Writing - Grade Level Reports….…………………………. 65

Writing - Graduation Class Cohort………………………... 71

Advanced Placement (AP) Exams.........………………………. 74

Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT)…………………………………. 80

Post Secondary Placement……………………………………... 82

2


Enrollment

Student enrollment is reported by school and grade level on the New Hampshire

Department of Education website. These reports are generated by each school district

as of October 1st of the academic year.

The most recent report at the time of this publication is from October 1, 2011 for the

2011-2012 school year and was last updater February 8th 2012. The most recent data

is reflected in the following pages.

More information regarding this can be found on the New Hampshire Department of

Education website at the following address:

http://www.education.nh.gov/data/attendance.htm

Enrollment data is also published in the Timberlane Annual Report by town, and

grade level. The most recent Annual Reports can be found on the School Board

website under “Board Documents” on the Timberlane School Board website, or by

clicking HERE.

3 Back to Table of Contents




https://public.timberlane.net/sau/trsb/default.aspx


4

Timberlane Enrollment

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Timberlane Enrollment by Academic Year

Elementary School Middle School High School

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

Elementary Enrollment

Plaistow Atkinson Sandown Danville

Back to Table of Contents


Atkinson 1014 - 24%

Danville 786 - 19% Plaistow

1269 - 31%

Sandown 1082 - 26%

020406080

100120140

PK K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Atkinson

020406080

100120140

PK K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Plaistow

020406080

100120140

PK K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Sandown

020406080

100120140

PK K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Danville

5

Timberlane Enrollment

2011-2012 Enrollment by town



Average Daily Membership (ADM)

Average Daily Membership (ADM) is derived from the attendance records of each

District within New Hampshire. The data is usually published in March for the previous

academic year. Membership is the half day attendance and absence added together –

divided by the number of half days in the year’s instructional program, usually 360, to

determine average daily membership. A half day attendance is where a student is

present for a half day under the guidance and direction of a teacher. An excused

absence because of sickness or for any other reason is not counted as a half-day of

attendance.

The calculation of ADM is a critical function because it is the basis for New

Hampshire’s state adequacy aid distribution. ADM is also used at Timberlane to

compute the percentage of the total operating budget each town is billed by the School

District.




More information about how the co-operative school district of Timberlane utilizes

ADM can be found in the Timberlane Articles of Agreement.

6

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Atkinson

Danville

Plaistow

Sandown




http://wp.timberlane.net/wp-content/uploads/Articles-of-Agreement.pdf


7

Atkinson 966.58

24% of OB

Danville 762.10

19% of OB Plaistow 1,207.43

30% of OB

Sandown 1,071.55

27% of OB

OB = Operating Budget

2011-2012 ADM by town


0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Sandown ADM

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Plaistow

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Danville

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Atkinson



8


0500

1,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,5004,0004,5005,000

Average Daily Membership by Level

Elementary Middle High

0.0

500.0

1000.0

1500.0

2000.0

Average Daily Membership by Level


2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Elementary 1,824.9 1,667.7 1,892.3 1,767.2 1,770.4 1,499.5 1,409.4

Middle 1,089.5 1,069.4 1,057.0 1,054.3 1,026.3 1,044.7 1,015.0

High 1,509.5 1,574.4 1,543.3 1,467.3 1,441.1 1,428.9 1,406.7



9

71

58 62 59 59 55 57

74 67 71 72

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

01020304050607080

Stat

e T

ota

l Stu

de

nts

Tim

be

rlan

e S

tud

en

ts

Home Schooled Students

State Timberlane


Home Schooled Students

There were seventy two home schooled students from Timberlane in the 2011-2012

academic year. These seventy two students do not count toward ADM.








Equalized Property Valuation (EPV)

Equalized Property Valuation is used by Timberlane to determine the percentage of

the capital budget each town is required to pay.



http://www.education.nh.gov/data/financial.htm

More information about how the co-operative school district of Timberlane funds our

schools can be found in the Timberlane Articles of Agreement.

10

-

500,000,000

1,000,000,000

1,500,000,000

2,000,000,000

2,500,000,000

3,000,000,000

3,500,000,000

ATKINSON

DANVILLE

PLAISTOW

SANDOWN







11

2010-2011 EPV by town

Equalized Property Valuation (EPV)

Atkinson $842,492,003

33% of CB

Danville $330,590,251

13% of CB

Plaistow $878,755,744

34% of CB

Sandown $523,254,664

20% of CB

-

200,000,000

400,000,000

600,000,000

800,000,000

1,000,000,000

1,200,000,000

20

00

-20

01

20

01

-20

02

20

02

-20

03

20

03

-20

04

20

04

-20

05

20

05

-20

06

20

06

-20

07

20

07

-20

08

20

08

-20

09

20

09

-20

10

20

10

-20

11

Atkinson EPV

-

200,000,000

400,000,000

600,000,000

800,000,000

1,000,000,000

1,200,000,000

20

00

-20

01

20

01

-20

02

20

02

-20

03

20

03

-20

04

20

04

-20

05

20

05

-20

06

20

06

-20

07

20

07

-20

08

20

08

-20

09

20

09

-20

10

20

10

-20

11

Danville EPV

-

200,000,000

400,000,000

600,000,000

800,000,000

1,000,000,000

1,200,000,000

20

00

-20

01

20

01

-20

02

20

02

-20

03

20

03

-20

04

20

04

-20

05

20

05

-20

06

20

06

-20

07

20

07

-20

08

20

08

-20

09

20

09

-20

10

20

10

-20

11

Plaistow EPV

-

200,000,000

400,000,000

600,000,000

800,000,000

1,000,000,000

1,200,000,000

20

00

-20

01

20

01

-20

02

20

02

-20

03

20

03

-20

04

20

04

-20

05

20

05

-20

06

20

06

-20

07

20

07

-20

08

20

08

-20

09

20

09

-20

10

20

10

-20

11

Sandown EPV

CB = Capital Budget



School Funding

The cost per pupil at Timberlane for the 2011-2012 school year was $13,005. The

current state school funding formula allots $4,793 per pupil to each town within the

district based on Average Daily Membership (ADM). The gap of $8,212 per student,

minus federal dollars, then falls to the property owner in the form of both a local and

state property tax.

The method by which each respective town pays for their portion of the Timberlane

budget is defined in the Timberlane Articles of Agreement. Every dollar within the

overall budget is defined as being part of either the operating or capital budget. Each

town then pays an amount of the operating budget proportional to their portion of the

overall ADM and each town also pays an amount of the capital budget proportional to

their portion of the overall Equalized Property Value (EPV).




More information about how the co-operative school district of Timberlane funds our

schools can be found in the Timberlane Articles of Agreement.








13

School Funding

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

Funding of School Budget

State Plaistow Atkinson Sandown Danville Federal


0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%

7.00%

8.00%

9.00%

0

10,000,000

20,000,000

30,000,000

40,000,000

50,000,000

60,000,000

70,000,000

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014

Timberlane Budget

TRSD Budget % increase


14

5.10%

4.20% 3.80%

3.30% 3.40%

2.70%

1.90% 2.20%

1.60%

0.48% 0.28% 0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%

Drop Out Rate

Timberlane State

Drop Out Rate

In 2007 the New Hampshire state legislature increased the drop out eligibility age to

18. Over the last couple of years Timberlane has developed several paths for students

toward obtaining a high school diploma. Through our evening division, credit recovery

program and a concerted effort by our high school administrators, teachers and staff

we have continuously improved the drop out rate at Timberlane High School.



http://www.education.nh.gov/data/dropouts.htm






Education Attainment for Teachers

Every year the New Hampshire Department of Education collects information about

teacher’s level of education or attainment. They tally bachelors, masters, and beyond

masters degrees for all full and part time teachers K – 12. Administrators and non

teacher staff are not included in these tallies.



http://www.education.nh.gov/data/staffing.htm






16

Education Achievement for Teachers

40.0

42.0

44.0

46.0

48.0

50.0

52.0

54.0

56.0

58.0

60.0

Bachelors Degrees

Timberlane State

40.0

42.0

44.0

46.0

48.0

50.0

52.0

54.0

56.0

58.0

60.0

Masters Degrees

Timberlane State

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Teacher Attainment

Bachelors Masters Bayond Masters



Average Teacher Salary

The average teacher salary for Timberlane has increased an average of .67% per

year in the previous four school years. Many factors contribute to the reason why this

is true including attrition, hiring practices, no cost of living adjustment, no step raise,

etc…

As a result of this we are now seeing our average teacher’s salaries decreasing and

losing ground in relation to the state in general and, more importantly, the southern tier

of New Hampshire.

The 2013 – 2016 Timberlane Teacher’s Association (TTA) contract was just

approved by the voters of Timberlane. The School Board and TTA, taking into account

the state of the economy and our local property tax situation, engaged in lengthy

negotiations that resulted in this fair contract. We feel it is respectful of the tax payers

and teachers alike and gets us back on the road to providing a more competitive

offering to attract and retain excellent teachers here at Timberlane.

More information regarding teacher’s salaries can be found on the New Hampshire

Department of Education website at the following address:



https://public.timberlane.net/sau/trsb/Shared Documents/TTA UNION CONTRACT 2013-2016.pdf








18


Timberlane $53,697

State Average $53,702

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

Average Teacher Salary by District 2011-2012

46,000

47,000

48,000

49,000

50,000

51,000

52,000

53,000

54,000

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012


Timberlane State Average



19


$30,000

$35,000

$40,000

$45,000

$50,000

$55,000

$60,000

$65,000

$70,000

$75,000

Average Teacher Salary in the Southern Tier of NH 2011-2012

30,000

31,000

32,000

33,000

34,000

35,000

36,000

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Teacher Starting Salary




Student Teacher Ratio

Every fall the teacher full time equivalent (FTE) and student enrollment for

Timberlane is reported to the New Hampshire Department of Education (NH DOE).

From these numbers the student teacher ratio is calculated and reported on the NH

DOE website.

Timberlane has seen continued declining enrollments and with those declines in

students there have been proportional declines in teachers, administrators and staff.

More information regarding teacher to student ratio can be found on the New

Hampshire Department of Education website at the following address:



http://www.education.nh.gov/index.htm







21

Student Teacher Ratio

290

300

310

320

330

340

350

360

370

3600

3700

3800

3900

4000

4100

4200

4300

4400

4500

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Teac

he

rs

Stu

de

nts

Students and Teachers at Timberlane

Students Teachers

11.6

11.8

12.0

12.2

12.4

12.6

12.8

13.0

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Student to Teacher Ratio




Free/Reduced Lunch

Every fall the enrollment of the District is reported along with the number of students

eligible for the national free/reduced lunch program.

All students who are homeless, runaway, migrant, in foster care, receiving benefits

from Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) or the Financial Assistance

to Needy Families Program (FANF), or households with incomes below the following

guidelines may be eligible:

If you have any questions about this program please contact Kelli Killen at the SAU

Office at 382-6119 ext. 2231 or visit the following website:

http://www.education.nh.gov/program/nutrition/nslp_application.htm

More information regarding the Free and Reduced lunch data for the state of New

Hampshire can be found on the New Hampshire Department of Education website at

the following address:


22

Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Each additional Household

member add:

Yearly Income $20,665 $27,991 $35,317 $42,643 $49,969 $57,295 $64,621 $71,947 $7,326


http://www.education.nh.gov/program/nutrition/nslp_application.htm





23

Percent Free and Reduced Lunch Students

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

14.00%

16.00%

18.00%

Timberlane Free and Reduced Lunch by Level

Elementary

Middle

High

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

Free and Reduced Lunch %

State

Timberlane



Cost per pupil

The cost per pupil data is calculated by taking current expenditures less tuition and

transportation costs and dividing by the average daily attendance.

More information regarding the cost per pupil data for the state of New Hampshire

can be found on the New Hampshire Department of Education website at the following

address:






25

Cost per Pupil

Timberlane $13,005

State Average $13,159

-

5,000.00

10,000.00

15,000.00

20,000.00

25,000.00

30,000.00

35,000.00

Average Cost per Pupil All NH School Districts

13

,47

9.9

3

$1

3,4

13

.70

13

,14

6.8

9

$1

2,6

05.

50

12

,36

4.3

0

$1

3,1

01

.48

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

$16,000

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 State

Cost per Pupil at Timberlane




26

Technology Infrastructure

District-wide MPLS Wide Area Network. Each school and the district office have a T1 line to support voice, video, and data

traffic.

Managed wireless LAN (WLAN) is now installed in all schools, PAC, and district office.

A fiber optic backbone connects the district office, High School, PAC, and Middle School.

SonicWALL network security at all locations.

Barracuda Networks provides email security and spam blocking.

Comcast broadband cable provides additional Internet access in all schools and the district office.

The High School and Middle School were recently upgraded to Business Class lines to provide additional bandwidth for

streaming video, and other media intensive applications.

VoIP phone systems are now installed in the district office, High School, PAC, and Middle School.

o Addition of phones for each classroom.

o An integrated system that supports direct extension dialing, contact lists, and voicemail throughout the campus.

o Provides E911 capability in the High School and Middle School.

Community Website Presence & Communications

o Each school has a website that incorporates a consistent “look and feel”, and a district website provides links to all

school sites, as well as district level information.

• The Middle School has recently been revamped and is the first TRSD school website that utilizes the new

WordPress platform.

This platform provides the schools with enhanced capability and ease-of-use for adding and

maintaining their content.

The plan is to eventually migrate all of the school websites to WordPress.

o The School Board, and now the Budget Committee websites incorporate Windows SharePoint Services.

• This provides public access to information, and a secure sign in capability for Board and Committee

members to access agenda packets, etc.

o Both the High School and Middle School provide email distribution services that parents can subscribe to in order to

receive automatic emails sent out from the schools.

o Each school has a Twitter presence that provides continuous short informational messages.

o There is also a district-wide Twitter account.

o WebEvent provides an online calendar of school and district events.

School Board meetings, as well as other official meetings (Public Hearing, Deliberative Session) are broadcast live over the

district’s TV network.

o Recently included with this are the Budget Committee meetings, including the annual School/Department Budget

Request Presentations.

Recorded meetings and other events are made available via the Internet for viewing using Vimeo.

o Full-length, HD videos.

o Currently, there are 220 archived videos available for public viewing.

o Each school also uses SchoolTube to publish shorter school-based activity videos.

Computers

The School District currently has 1,770 desktop computers, 668 laptop computers, and 219 netbook computers.

High School

The Business Department and Math Department have computer labs that support 1:1 student/computer class

activities.

A fully-equipped computer lab was established for the English Department for 1:1 writing instruction.

The Library computer lab is shared by all departments and is used most all periods each day.

The Math, English, and Science Departments each have a COW (24 computers on wheels) that can be moved into

classrooms as needed.

Additional desktop and laptop computers are in use by other departments, including Health and Art.

The A/V lab has been upgraded with new computers, cameras, and a dedicated green screen background.

Middle School

The Technology classrooms are fully equipped for 1:1 student/computer class activities.

The Library computer lab is shared by all teams and is in use most of each day.

2 laptop COW’s and 3 netbook COW’s are used by various teams.

Three Science classrooms have 24 netbook computers, provided by the recent ARRA Grant that was awarded to the

Middle School.

The Literacy lab has 20 laptop computers that used on a regular basis. Each room has at least 3 desktop computers

for teacher and student use.



27

Technology Computers

Elementary Schools

All Elementary Schools have 5 computers in each classroom, with the exception of Kindergarten classrooms and some

1st grade classrooms.

The recent deployment strategy is to provide wireless laptop or netbook computers to accommodate student-centered

group learning.

Each Elementary School has a fully-equipped computer lab for technology instruction.

The Waterford labs are also used for 1:1 student/computer activities.

Distance Learning

o Each school is equipped with videoconferencing equipment that supports the H.323 A/V protocol.

o We are currently in a multi-year process to replace outdated codecs with new units that support HD video.

These new codecs are a lot more portable so they provide the ability to bring the equipment to any

classroom for distance learning sessions.

o Skype is being used by some teachers as a desktop distance learning solution.

Classroom Presentation

o Each Elementary School classroom is equipped with a “Presentation System” that includes a cart, laptop

computer, projector, and interactive tablet.

o The interactive tablet (Mobi) is a mobile wireless device that provides interactive whiteboard functionality.

o This implementation model supports student-centered instruction and provides enhanced flexibility within the

classroom.

All High School classrooms, and about 95% of the Middle School classrooms have projection carts, with some that also include

an interactive tablet.

Other Technology Resources

Additional technology resources in use throughout the district include digital cameras, document cameras, and desktop scanners.

Technology Professional Development

A number of technology-based workshops are routinely offered during Professional Development days. Some workshops are also offered

occasionally after school. The Technology Department collaborates with the Mentoring Program to provide technology based workshops to

new teachers in August.

A new “Technology Discovery Center” (TDC) was created this year to provide a facility for High School and Middle School teachers to

explore and become acquainted with new technology resources. Teachers can work independently, with peers, or with Technology

Department staff to demonstrate and share ideas for integrating technology in their classrooms. The TDC is located in room 500 in the High

School, across from the Technology Department office.



New England Common Assessment

Program (NECAP)

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), a reauthorization of the Elementary

and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), required states to create assessments in basic

skills. In New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont the New England Common

Assessment Program (NECAP) is utilized for this purpose.

Every year in the month of October grades 3-8 and 11 take this assessment, the

NECAP, in both Math and Reading. Writing is also administered in grades 5, 8 and 11.

Every year in the month of May grades 4,8 and 11 take this assessment, the NECAP,

in Science.

Once taken and scored the state determines if each school and district has made

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). AYP is defined by NCLB and determined by a

number of factors including scores of the disaggregated as well as aggregated student

cohort and the progression of the scores in each cohort. Two consecutive years of not

making AYP and a school and/or district will be classified as “In Need of Improvement.”

Two years of making AYP are required to shed this classification. Every two years the

requirements for making AYP are increased with the goal that all children are deemed

“proficient.”

All NECAP test results in this Report Card are from the “Teaching Year” data set.

What this means is that only the students who were instructed the year before in a

Timberlane school are compiled into these results. Students taking the test at

Timberlane who were not enrolled at a Timberlane school the prior year are excluded.

This allows us to focus only on Timberlane instruction from the prior year.

More information regarding the New England Common Assessment can be found

on the New Hampshire Department of Education website at the following address:

http://www.education.nh.gov/instruction/assessment/necap/index.htm


http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml

http://www.education.nh.gov/instruction/accountability/ayp/index.htm

http://www.education.nh.gov/instruction/assessment/necap/results/documents/guide_2012.pdf






Program

Reading

29

Administered to students in October. Results of the exam are returned to the

school district in late January.



30


NECAP

Grade 3 Reading

72 81 81 81

70

94 85

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Plaistow Grade 3 Reading Results

4 3 2 1 % Proficient

63

74 85 85

91 91

71

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Sandown Grade 3 Reading Results


84 81 75

90 88 94

87

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Atkinson Grade 3 Reading Results


75

93 81 84 82 84 81

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Danville Grade 3 Reading Results




31


NECAP

Grade 3 Reading

74 81 80

85 82

91

81

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Entire District Grade 3 Reading Results


74

81 80

85 82

91

81

71 69

73 72

80 80 81

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Grade 3 Reading Results

Timberlane % Proficient State % Proficient



32


NECAP

Grade 4 Reading

73 80

75

92 80

89 95

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



70 70 78

74 76 74 74

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



78 71 72 72

76 72

79

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



56

73 73

84 88 86 87

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100





33


NECAP

Grade 4 Reading

70

80 75

92

80 81 85

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012



70

80

75

92

80 81 85

70 72

74 75 75 77

79

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012





34


NECAP

Grade 5 Reading

84 85 83 80 84 84

94

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



80 80 79 85 82

86

69

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



67

84

65

82 79 84

68

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



55

73 84 79

87 87 88

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100





35


NECAP

69

81 77

81 83 84 81

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012



Grade 5 Reading

69

81 77

81 83 84

81

67

72 71

76 79 78 77

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012





36


NECAP

Grade 6 Reading

79 81 86 85 82 84

93

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



63

78 78 81 83 76

86

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



72 69

85 76

80 72

81

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



62 65

77 81 71

83 78

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100





37


NECAP

Grade 6 Reading

70 73 81 80 78 78

84

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012



70 73

81 80 78 78

84

65

72 73 74 76 77

80

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012





38


NECAP

Grade 7 Reading

64

72 74

87

82

75

80

66 67

75 77 77

72

77

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012




64

72 74

87 82

75 80

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012




39


NECAP

Grade 8 Reading

71 73 72 75 81 78

88

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012




71 73 72

75

81 78

88

66 67

75 77 77

72

77

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012




40


NECAP

Grade 11 Reading

58 64 67 68

75

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010



58

64 67 68

75 67

72 73 74 77

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010






Program

Reading – Graduation Class Cohort

41



Following are tables depicting the vertical analysis of each graduating class

as they moved through the school system.



42


NECAP

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3 4 5 6 7 8 11

Grade

NECAP Reading % Proficient

Class of 2010

Class of 2011

Class of 2012

Class of 2013

Class of 2013

Class of 2014

Class of 2015

Class of 2016

Class of 2017

Class of 2018

Class of 2019

Class of 2020

71 64

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

8 11

Class of 2010 Reading


64 73

67

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

7 8 11





43


NECAP

70 72 72 68

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

6 7 8 11



69 73 74 75 75

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

5 6 7 8 11



70

81 81 87 81

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

4 5 6 7 8



74 80 77 80 82 78

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3 4 5 6 7 8





44


NECAP

81 75

81 78 75

88

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3 4 5 6 7 8



80

92 83 78 80

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3 4 5 6 7



85 80 84 84

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3 4 5 6



82 81 81

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3 4 5






Program

Math

45





46


NECAP

Grade 3 Math

85 79 82

89 90 90

75

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Atkinson Grade 3 Math Results


65

87 83

87 81 78 76

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Danville Grade 3 Math Results


66 73

86 82

78 78 76

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Plaistow Grade 3 Math Results


56

71

90 86 93

83 84

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Sandown Grade 3 Math Results




47


NECAP

Grade 3 Math

69

76

85 86 85 82

78

68 69 73 72

76 76 76

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Grade 3 Math Results


69 76

85 86 85 82 78

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Timberlane Grade 3 Math Results




48


NECAP

Grade 4 Math

80 85

76

88 86 88 91

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



49

61

77 76 75 65

72

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



73 65

74 70 72 68 66

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



37

72 74 85 86

73 79

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100





49


NECAP

Grade 4 Math

61

72 75

80 80

73

78

65 66

68

73 75 74

76

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012



61

72 75 80 80

73 78

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012





50


NECAP

Grade 5 Math

78

89 88 88 82 79

85

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



70 71 71 81 79 79

73

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



50

74 64

71 75 70 66

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



45

77 81 87 88 87 87

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100





51


NECAP

Grade 5 Math

78 76

81 81 79 78

63 67 69

73 75

73 76

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012



59

78 76 81 81 79 78

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012





52


NECAP

Grade 6 Math

77 77 84 88

82 84 93

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



48

78 75 71 81 81 80

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



56 60

76 71 74

66 69

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100



50 60

76 71 68 72

79

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100





53


NECAP

Grade 6 Math

58

68 76 76 74

66 69

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012



58

68

76 76

74

66 69 61

67 68 69

76 77 80

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012





54


NECAP

Grade 7 Math

54 58

62 66

70 72 70

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012



54 58

62

66 70 72 70

59 62 63

66 66 66 68

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012





55


NECAP

Grade 8 Math

52 52 48

65 73

68 76

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012



52 52 48

65

73 68

76

56 57 58 65 66 66 68

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012





56


NECAP

Grade 11 Math

25 28 31 25

33

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010



25 28 31 25

33

28 32 33 36 36

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010


Timberlane % Proficient State % Proficiennt




Program

Math – Graduation Class Cohort

57




as they moved through the school system.



58


NECAP

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3 4 5 6 7 8 11

Grade

NECAP Math % Proficient

Class of 2010

Class of 2011

Class of 2012

Class of 2014

Class of 2015

Class of 2016

Class of 2017

Class of 2018

Class of 2019

Class of 2020

52

28

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

8 11

Class of 2010 Math


54 52

31

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

7 8 11

Class of 2011 Math




59


NECAP

58 58

48

25

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

6 7 8 11

Class of 2012 Math


61

78 76 66 73

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

4 5 6 7 8

Class of 2014 Math


69 72 76 76

70 68

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3 4 5 6 7 8

Class of 2015 Math


59

68 62 65

33

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

5 6 7 8 11

Class of 2013 Math




60


NECAP

76 75 81

74 72 76

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3 4 5 6 7 8

Class of 2016 Math


85 80 81

66 70

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3 4 5 6 7

Class of 2017 Math


86 80 79

69

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3 4 5 6

Class of 2018 Math


85

73 78

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3 4 5

Class of 2019 Math





Science

61

Administered to students in May. Results of the exam are returned to the

school district in September.



62


NECAP

Grade 4 Science

58 66 67

80 80

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-2012

Atkinson Grade 4 Science Results


64

53 51 47

58

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Danville Grade 4 Science Results


43

53

37 37 34

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-2012

Plaistow Grade 4 Science Results


60 68

78

61 59

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Sandown Grade 4 Science Results




63


NECAP

Grade 4 Science


55 61 58 56 59

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Timberlane Grade 4 Science Results


55 61

58 56 59

51 54 54 55 53

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Grade 4 Science Results



64


NECAP

Grade 8 Science

31 26

39

30

43

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012



31 26

39

30

43

27 25 28 28 32

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012





65


NECAP

Grade 11 Science

23 17 16 17

21

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012



23 17 16 17 21

22 24 24 27 33

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012






Writing

66





67


NECAP

Grade 5 Writing

81 74 74

69 65

82

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Atkinson Grade 5 Writing Results


64

53 61

71

59 51

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Danville Grade 5 Writing Results


64 68

47

68

56 58

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Plaistow Grade 5 Writing Results


45

64

77 72

67 58

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Sandown Grade 5 Writing Results




68


NECAP

Grade 5 Writing

63 66 64

69

62 62

51 50 52

60 56 55

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Grade 5 Writing Results


63 66 64 69

62 62

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Timberlane Grade 5 Writing Results




69


NECAP

Grade 8 Writing

61 55

50 53

64 64

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012



61 55

50 53

64 64

49

42 43

51

64 61

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012





70


NECAP

Grade 11 Writing

26

38 40

50

40

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012



26

38 40

50

40

33 39

50

45

46

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012






Program

Writing – Graduation Class Cohort

71




as they move through the school system.



72


NECAP

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

5 8 11

Grade

NECAP Writing % Proficient

Class of 2010

Class of 2011

Class of 2012

Class of 2014

Class of 2015

Class of 2016

Class of 2018

Class of 2019

61

38

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

8 11

Class of 2010 Writing


55

40

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

8 11





73


NECAP

50 50

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

8 11



40

53

40

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

5 8 11



64 64

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

5 8



69 64

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

5 8





Advanced Placement Exams

The Advanced Placement (AP) Exams are administered by the College Board in the

spring of each year. Scores on the exam range between 1 and 5. A student who

scores a 3, 4 or 5 may be granted placement, credit and/or exemption from specific

courses by the college or university they attend.

Every AP course offered at high schools across the country are identical and they

are designed by the College Board. The AP exam for each respective AP course is

now required of all students taking an AP course at Timberlane.

More information regarding Advanced Placement Exams and courses can be found

on the New Hampshire Department of Education website at the following address:

http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/Controller.jpf


http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/Controller.jpf


75

Advanced Placement Exam

70.6

63.2 61.8 61.4

53.8

73.9 74.9 75.4

76.6 75.6

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

AP Exam Results – All Exams Timberlane Regional High School vs. State of NH

TRSD % of Exams 3+

State % of Exams 3+

70.6 63.2 61.8 61.4

53.8

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

AP Exam Results Timberlane Regional High School

Total AP Students Number of exams % of Exams 3+



76

23%

41%

0%

47% 57%

67% 65% 67% 64% 63%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Biology AP Exam Results Timberlane Regional High School vs. State of NH

TRSD % of Exams 3+

State % of Exams 3+

89%

78% 76%

70%

60%

74% 75%

68% 68%

75%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Calculus AB AP Exam Results Timberlane Regional High School vs. State of NH

TRSD % of Exams 3+

State % of Exams 3+

100%

20%

29% 33%

40%

64% 70%

65% 64% 68%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Chemistry AP Exam Results Timberlane Regional High School vs. State of NH

TRSD % of Exams 3+

State % of Exams 3+



77

64%

54%

64%

79%

52%

77% 76% 75% 80%

77%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

English Literature and Composition AP Exam Results Timberlane Regional High School vs. State of NH

TRSD % of Exams 3+

State % of Exams 3+

59%

70%

58%

38%

69% 62%

71% 72% 72% 72%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Physics B AP Exam Results Timberlane Regional High School vs. State of NH

TRSD % of Exams 3+

State % of Exams 3+

100% 100% 82%

50% 50%

67% 88%

75%

70%

83%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Computer Science A AP Exam Results Timberlane Regional High School vs. State of NH

TRSD % of Exams 3+

State % of Exams 3+



78

100%

64%

25%

62%

75% 74% 70% 70% 72%

70%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Statistics AP Exam Results Timberlane Regional High School vs. State of NH

TRSD % of Exams 3+

State % of Exams 3+

27%

58%

75%

25% 31%

62% 68%

64%

63% 62%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

United States Government and Politics AP Exam Results Timberlane Regional High School vs. State of NH

TRSD % of Exams 3+

State % of Exams 3+


81%

69%

87%

50%

73%

62% 64% 70%

67%

68%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

United States History AP Exam Results Timberlane Regional High School vs. State

TRSD % of Exams 3+

State % of Exams 3+


79

50%

60%

50%

100%

33%

78% 81% 78%

69%

62%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

World History AP Exam Results Timberlane Regional High School vs. State of NH

TRSD % of Exams 3+

State % of Exams 3+



Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT)

The Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) is still the gold standard used for college

applications and admittance. The state data provided here is only from public schools.

Exclusion of the private school data was done in order to obtain an “apples to apples”

look at how Timberlane compares to the other school districts throughout New

Hampshire.

More information regarding the Scholastic Aptitude Test can be found on the New

Hampshire Department of Education website at the following address:

http://www.collegeboard.org/


http://www.collegeboard.org/


81

Scholastic Aptitude Testing

493 494

498 507

484

470

480

490

500

510

520

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Critical Reading SAT Scores

TRHS National State Public Schools

503

495

516 518

505

490

500

510

520

530

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Math SAT Scores


497

480

498

485

485

470

480

490

500

510

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012

Writing SAT Scores




Post-Secondary Placement

The Post-Secondary Placement data was obtained through the Timberlane

Guidance Department. Data was collected for those who applied, were accepted to

and attended each and every college and university for the graduating class of 2012.



83

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Post Secondary Schools Applied to 155 schools had less than 5 Timberlane students apply

Post Secondary Placement of the Class of 2012

The Class of 2012 graduated 331 students who submitted 773 applications to 187 post

secondary schools. 650 of those applying were accepted and ultimately 273 Timberlane

students attended their post secondary options. In contrast, the Class of 2011 graduated 354

students who submitted 844 applications , 706 were accepted and 308 attended

Students Attending % Attending Applied Accepted Denied

Class of 2011 354 308 87.0% 844 706 138

Class of 2012 331 273 82.5% 773 650 118



84

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Post Secondary Schools Attended 55 Schools had only one Timberlane student attend

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Post Secondary Schools Timberlane Students Accepted 157 Schools accepted less than 4 Timberlane students



85

School Name Applied Attended Accepted Denied

Adelphi University 1 0 1 0

American International College 1 0 1 0

Amherst College 1 0 0 1

Arizona State University 1 0 0 1

Auburn Univerrsity Montgomery 1 0 1 0

Bates College 5 0 0 5

Bay Path College 1 0 1 0

Bay State College 1 0 1 0

Bentley University 1 0 0 1

Berwick Academy 1 1 1 0

Boston College 3 0 0 3

Boston University 7 0 1 6

Bowdoin College 2 0 0 2

Bridgewater State College 1 0 0 1

Bryant University 2 0 2 0

Bunker Hill Community College 1 1 1 0

Burlington College VT 1 0 1 0

CastletonState - VT 1 0 1 0

Champlain College 1 0 1 0

Clarkson University 2 0 2 0

Clemson University 1 0 1 0

Coastal Carolina Community College 1 1 1 0

Coastal Carolina University 2 0 2 0

Colby College 2 0 0 2

Colby-Sawyer College 8 2 8 0

Concordia University 1 0 1 0

Continental Academie of Hair Design 4 4 4 0

Culinary Institute of America 2 2 2 0

Curry College 6 1 5 1

Daniel Webster College 5 2 5 0

Dartmouth College 2 0 0 2

Dean College 1 0 1 0

DePaul University 1 0 1 0

Drexel University 3 0 3 0

Eckerd College - FL 2 1 2 0

Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona 1 1 1 0

Emerson College 2 2 2 0

Emmanuel College 10 3 9 1



86


Empire Beauty School 1 1 1 0

EMT Certification Program 1 0 1 0

Endicott College 6 2 3 3

Fairfield University 1 0 1 0

Fisher College 1 0 1 0

Flagler College 1 0 1 0

Fontbonne University 1 0 1 0

Framingham State College 1 1 1 0

Franciscan University - OH 1 1 1 0

Franklin Pierce 4 0 4 0

George Mason University 1 0 0 1

Gordon College 1 0 1 0

Great Bay Community College 7 7 7 0

Green Mountain College 1 1 1 0

Hampshire College 1 0 1 0

Harvard College 1 0 0 1

Hawaii Pacific University 2 0 2 0

Hesser - Manchester 1 1 1 0

Hesser College (2-year) 1 0 1 0

Hofstra University 5 0 5 0

Howard University 1 1 1 0

Husson University 2 0 1 1

Indiana University 1 0 1 0

Iona College 1 0 1 0

Ithaca College 3 0 3 0

Johnson & Wales 6 2 6 0

Johnson State College 1 1 0

Johnson State College 1 1 1 0

Keene Beauty Academy 1 1 1 0

Keene State College 44 13 36 8

Lafayette College 1 0 1 0

Lasalle University 1 0 1 0

Lasell College 3 3 3 0

Lesley College 2 0 1 1

Lycoming College - PA 1 0 1 0

Lyndon State College 3 1 3 0

Lynn University 1 0 1 0

Maine College of Art 1 0 1 0



87


Manchester Community College 7 6 7 0

Manhattan College 1 0 1 0

Marist College 0 0 0 0

MCPHS 2 1 2 0

Mercer University 1 0 1 0

Merrimack College 13 5 12 1

Michael's School of Hair Design 1 1 1 0

Middlebury College 1 0 0 1

Middlesex Community College 1 1 1 0

Mount Ida College 1 0 1 0

NE Institute of Art 1 0 1 0

NECC 76 72 76 0

New England College 6 0 6 0

New York University 0 0 0 0

NH Air National Guard 1 1 1 0

NH Fire Academy 1 1 1 0

NHTI - Concord 7 7 7 0

Nichols College 0 0 0 0

North Carolina State University 1 1 1 0

Northeastern University 13 0 3 10

Northwestern University 1 0 0 1

Pace University (Manhattan) 2 1 2 0

Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre Graduate Program 1 1 1 0

Plymouth State University 49 14 43 6

Post University 1 1 1 0

Primal Instincts Piercing School 0 0 0 0

Providence College 3 1 2 1

Quinnipiac University 5 0 5 0

Quinsigamond CC 1 1 1 0

Regis College 1 1 1 0

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 4 0 2 2

Rider University 1 0 1 0

River Valley Community College 1 1 1 0

Rivier College 4 0 4 0

Roanoke College 1 0 1 0

Rochester Institute of Technology 4 0 3 1

Roger Williams University 11 0 11 0

Salem State University 2 0 2 0



88


Salisbury University MD 2 0 2 0

Salter School - Manchester 2 2 2 0

Salve Regina 1 0 1 0

San Jose State University 1 1 1 0

Seton Hall 1 1 1 0

Siena College 1 0 1 0

Simmons College 5 1 3 2

SNHU - Manchester 40 10 38 2

Southern Maine Community College 1 0 1 0

Spa Tech Institute 1 1 1 0

Springfield College 1 1 1 0

St. Anselm College 2 0 2 0

St. Edwards University 1 1 1 0

St. Francis Xavier University - Canada 1 1 1 0

St. Joseph's College of Maine 2 0 2 0

St. Michael's College 2 0 2 0

Steubenville 1 0 1 0

Stonehill College 6 1 6 0

Suffolk University 17 7 16 1

SUNY ESF 0 0 0 0

Texas A & M 1 1 1 0

The Citadel 1 0 1 0

Thomas College 3 2 2 1

Tufts University 2 0 0 2

U-Hartford/Hartt School of Music 1 0 1 0

U-Maine 1 0 1 0

U-Maine Orono 2 0 2 0

U-Mass Amherst 16 3 13 3

U-Mass Boston 2 1 2 0

U-Mass Dartmouth 3 0 3 0

U-Mass Lowell 14 3 12 2

UNC - Chapel Hill 1 0 0 1

UNH - Durham 104 31 82 22

UNH - Manchester 1 1 1 0

UNH - Thompson School of Applied Science 1 1 1 0

Unity College 1 1 1 0

University of California Santa Barbara 1 0 1 0

University of Central Florida 0 0 0 0



89


University of Chicago 1 0 0 1

University of Colorado 1 0 1 0

University of Connecticut 8 1 3 5

University of Delaware 1 0 1 0

University of Florida 1 0 0 1

University of Hartford 3 0 3 0

University of Hawaii Manoa 1 0 1 0

University of Kentucky 1 0 1 0

University of LaVerne CA 1 0 1 0

University of Miama 1 0 0 1

University of Michigan 3 1 1 2

University of Nevada - Las Vegas 1 1 1 0

University of New England 10 1 10 0

University of New Haven 4 0 3 1

University of Rhode Island 15 1 15 0

University of Southern California 1 0 0 1

University of Southern Maine 2 0 2 0

University of Tampa 4 2 2 2

University of Tennessee-Chattanooga 1 1 1 0

University of Vermont 10 3 10 0

US Air Force National Guard 1 1 1 0

US Army 4 4 4 0

US Army National Guard 1 1 1 0

US Coast Guard 1 1 1 0

US Marine Corps 2 2 2 0

U-Tennessee-Knoxville 1 0 1 0

Virginia Commonwealth University 1 0 1 0

Virginia Military Institute 1 0 1 0

Wentworth Institute of Technology 4 1 3 1

West Point 1 0 0 1

Western New England University 1 1 1 0

Wheaton College 1 1 1 0

Wheelock College 1 1 1 0

Whittier Tech 1 1 1 0

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 6 3 4 2


Timberlane Regional School District Report Card 2013Timberlane … · 2013. 4. 15. · The most...

Documents

Transcript of Timberlane Regional School District Report Card 2013Timberlane … · 2013. 4. 15. · The most...