Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

34

Transcript of Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

Page 1: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study
Page 2: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

A Presentation by

Page 3: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

3

Page 4: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

4

Page 5: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

5

Page 6: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

6

Page 7: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

7

a) A fire occurred at the home of Spyro and Roula Kallivrousis in Cheshire, Connecticut at around 1pm on July 13, 2003. b) While Spyro was at work, his wife, Roula attempted to mow the lawn using their John Deere LX 178 lawn tractor.

i) However, the engine was running poorly and Roula could not finish mowing the lawn. ii) The couple had owned the lawn tractor for nearly five years without issues up until the spring of 2003, when Roula reported that the tractor had been backfiring and running roughly after a tune-up and maintenance at a John Deere dealer.

Page 8: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

8

c) Roula stopped mowing and parked the tractor in the west-most bay of the attached three-bay garage. d) Later that morning, Roula reportedly noticed a “different kind of smell” in the garage, which she described as being like the smell of antifreeze. e) She reportedly inspected the interior of the garage, but seeing nothing unusual, left in her car with her children. f) Around an hour and a half later, witnesses reported a fire, which the Cheshire fire department responded to and extinguished.

i) No one was injured, but the fire damaged a substantial portion of the residence.  

Page 9: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

9

g) Fire marshals determined the fire originated in the west bay of the garage but could not pinpoint an exact cause or specific location. i) However, the marshals identified the lawn tractor as a “significant factor” in the cause of the fire.

h) After the homeowners filed a claim for the loss with plaintiff, plaintiff hired an investigator who concluded that the lawn tractor was the source of the fire.

Page 10: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

10

Page 11: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

11

a) Defendant argues that the trial court jury must have speculated to find liability because of a lack of evidence that the tractor, or the electrical system within the tractor, caused the fire.

i) Defendant also argued that even if the electrical system did cause the fire it may not have been because of a defect attributable to defendant.

b) Plaintiff maintains their case for liability was sufficient under the “Malfunction Theory”, allowing the inference of a product defect through circumstantial evidence when direct evidence is unavailable.

Page 12: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

12

Also Known As

  Indeterminate Defect Theory

  General Defect Theory

  A Principle of Circumstantial Evidence

  Strict Liability on Steroids

Page 13: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

13

  May Allow Inference of Defect without Defect

  May Allow Inference of Causation

  Or Both (Defect + Causation)

  Metropolitan Case CT Supreme Court 2011 Decision Cited by Many Courts, Treatises and Commentators

Page 14: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

14

i) Direct evidence of a defect is usually the basis of most products liability cases, but after a crash or explosion sometimes direct evidence is unavailable.

Page 15: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

15

i) Direct evidence of a defect is usually the basis of most products liability cases, but after a crash or explosion sometimes direct evidence is unavailable. ii) A plaintiff only has to present evidence of an unspecified “dangerous condition” and not evidence of a specific defect.

Page 16: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

16

i) Direct evidence of a defect is usually the basis of most products liability cases, but after a crash or explosion sometimes direct evidence is unavailable. ii) A plaintiff only has to present evidence of an unspecified “dangerous condition” and not evidence of a specific defect. iii) The plaintiff still must prove all the elements of a product liability claim, but permits a jury to infer the existence of a defect and causation.

Page 17: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

17

(1) the history and use of the particular product,

(2) the manner in which the product malfunctioned,

(3) similar malfunctions in similar products that may negate the possibility of other causes,

(4) the age of the product in relation to its life expectancy, and

(5) the most likely causes of the malfunction.

Page 18: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

18

The theory has similar principles to res ipsa loquitur, which allows inference of negligence from circumstances of an accident without direct evidence. (1) Proof of an accident alone does not establish manufacturer liability. (2) Unlike res ipsa loquitur, product liability case defendants rarely have control of whatever causes plaintiff ’s injury when it happens and product accidents occur for many reasons outside of defects.

Page 19: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

19

Application of the theory raises questions of fairness to product manufacturers because of the speculative evidence involved. (1) While losing a piece of key evidence due to a fire or explosion damages plaintiff ’s argument, the lack of direct evidence also prevents the defendant from being able to argue that a defect did not exist. (2) The missing evidence lightens the plaintiff ’s burden, when in reality the missing evidence could have been decisive for either party.

Page 20: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

20

Court’s conclusion on the Malfunction Theory i) A plaintiff can rely on circumstantial evidence to infer a product defect by establishing that the incident does not normally occur without a product defect and any defect existed when the product left the defendant’s control, and not the result of other causes. ii) Circumstantial evidence allowed to establish these factors includes history and use of the product, the manner in which it malfunctioned, the age of the product in relation to its life expectancy, and the most likely causes of the malfunction.

Page 21: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

21

Court’s analysis of Malfunction Theory to the present case i) Plaintiff presented insufficient evidence to eliminate other reasonable and possible causes of the defect and failed to establish that a defect in the tractor was attributable to the defendant. (1) Plaintiff ’s own expert testified that electrical failure could have occurred due to improper maintenance and use.  

Page 22: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

22

a) Plaintiff presented insufficient evidence to satisfy malfunction theory requirements. The trial court should not have allowed the jury to infer the defect attributable to the defendant. b) With no other evidence, plaintiff had no other theory to maintain a product liability claim. c) Judgment reversed, case remanded with direction to grant defendant’s motion for a directed verdict for the defendant.

Page 23: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

23

 Peanut butter jar

 Television

 Electric blanket

 Clothes dryer

 Aircraft

 Lawn tractor

 Coffee carafe

 Automobile

Page 24: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

24

 The malfunction theory stinks to high heaven  Go for Daubert or Frye challenge

 Fight applicability of Malfunction Doctrine before trial

 Look for spoliation angles

 Stay tuned as law is developing

 Do your part if you can

Page 25: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

25

Arizona�Arkansas�California�Colorado�Connecticut�Delaware�Florida�Hawaii �Idaho�Illinois�Indiana�

Kansas Louisiana�Michigan�Minnesota�Missouri �Montana�Nevada�New Jersey�New York�North Carolina�

Ohio�Oregon Pennsylvania�South Carolina�Texas�Washington�West Virginia�Wyoming

Page 26: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

Brian  Bornstein    AIG

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  

Brian  Bornstein  is  Claims  Regional  Vice  President  for  AIG  Mid-­‐Atlan:c  Region  and  is  based  in  Philadelphia.  In  this  posi:on  Brian  acts  as  the  senior  claims  execu:ve  in  the  region  and  makes  sure  that  claims  handled  in  the  mid-­‐atlan:c  region  are  serviced  appropriately.  Prior  to  joining  AIG  in  1995,  Brian  worked  as  in  house  counsel  with  Long  Island  Ligh:ng  Company  and  prac:ced  law  with  Lowenstein  Sandler  and  Bingham  Englar.  He  holds  a  B.A.  degree  from  Cornell  University  and  Law  (JD)  and  MBA  degrees  from  the  University  of  Buffalo.      

Page 27: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

Doherty & Progar was founded to provide personalized, superior legal representation in the Midwest. We are an AV-rated law firm and concentrate our practice solely on litigation. Each of our partners has more than twenty-five years of experience in all phases of litigation, from resolution prior to suit through jury trials involving tens of millions of dollars. While the specific types of lawsuits we have handled have varied over the years, there is a core trait evident in our collective experience: our commitment to providing our clients with superior legal representation coupled with unsurpassed efforts as their advocates. Our firm concentrates on advising and representing insurance carriers, their insureds, and businesses in all types of matters. We represent our clients in suits pending in state and federal courts, in claims filed with state and federal administrative agencies, and in negotiations, mediation, arbitration, and other alternative dispute resolution formats. We take pride in our services, which include advice and counsel on all matters within our areas of expertise. We consider such efforts to be central to the establishment of a partnering relationship with our clients.

Practice Areas:

Common Carrier and Innkeeper Liability; Construction Liability; Directors and Officers Liability; Dram Shop Liability; Personal and Commercial Liability; Product Liability; Professional Liability; Transportation Liability; Workers’ Compensation; Insurance Coverage; Employment Practices and Discrimination; Medical Negligence; Nursing Home Litigation; Municipal Law; Toxic Torts; Errors and Omissions; Appeals; Child Care Litigation; Class Actions.

Kevin W. Doherty Doherty & Progar, LLC

Chicago, Illinois   Mr. Doherty has acquired extensive experience in jury trial work and administrative claims in numerous forums throughout the Midwest. His practice encompasses a broad range of civil litigation and involves the handling of complex matters in both state and federal courts, as well as various administrative agencies. He represents a number of product manufacturers in product liability cases. Mr. Doherty has been published in the field of Illinois Civil Procedure, has lectured on complex litigation and trial practice and has attained a Martindale Hubbell® AV rating from his peers for each of the past 20 years. Mr. Doherty was recently accorded the honor of being named an Illinois Super Lawyer, a designation afforded to less than 5% of practicing lawyers in the State of Illinois. He has been selected to be a Fellow of the trial lawyer's honor society, Litigation Counsel of America.

Page 28: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg, LLC is committed to providing our clients high quality yet cost effective civil litigation services. From the inception of the firm in 1946, our highest priority has been service to our clients and we believe this is reflected by many companies having been clients of the firm for 20, 30, and 40 or more years. The firm offers litigators experienced in the areas of insurance coverage and bad faith, special investigations and fraud, premises liability and construction litigation, products liability, automobile insurance and liability, employment law, aviation law, subrogation and medical malpractice. The firm represents a variety of insurance carriers and insured and self-insured clients from our main office in Philadelphia as well as offices located in Blue Bell, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania and Lancaster, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, and Cherry Hill, New Jersey. From these locations, the firm routinely handles matters in eastern and central Pennsylvania and throughout New Jersey and New York although at the request of our clients, we frequently handle cases outside of those geographical areas.

Practice Areas:

Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith; Special Investigations and Fraud; Subrogation and Property Insurance; Products Liability; Premises Liability and Construction Litigation; Automobile; Medical Malpractice and Health Care; Commercial Motor Vehicle Defense; Food and Restaurant Defense; Aviation Litigation; Employment Law; Mass Tort and Environmental.

Charity  C.  Hyde    Bennett Bricklin & Saltzburg LLC

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  

Charity C. Hyde is a Member of Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg LLC and is admitted to practice in both the state and federal courts of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, and is also licensed to practice in the District of Columbia. Charity focuses her practice on products liability, toxic torts, premises liability, motor vehicle liability, and insurance fraud investigation. She has experience leading multi-attorney teams and representing large manufacturing clients, retailers and their insurers in several states. She is National Coordinating Counsel for a large, international manufacturing company. Charity has also represented many food manufacturers, as well as many retail stores and restaurant chains in potentially high exposure matters. Charity has extensive insurance defense experience and has arbitrated hundreds of cases involving products liability, premises liability and motor vehicle liability claims, as well as tried many cases to verdict with favorable results. She has also participated in the investigation and civil prosecution of individuals who submit fraudulent insurance claims including several medical providers.

Page 29: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

The law firm of Raymond Law Group in Glastonbury, Connecticut, provides aggressive and professional representation in cases involving business, technology, personal injury and employment. Bruce Raymond founded the firm in 2007 after a successful career at one of the region’s largest litigation and trial firms. Raymond Law Group was founded on the core principles of excellent client service, lean business practices, value billing, and effective use of technology in firm management and litigation. Bruce started the firm because he believed the traditional law firm model was failing to deliver value to clients in a rapidly changing business environment. Clients ranging from individuals, corporations and insurance companies were looking for an alternative to the traditional law firm model. Raymond Law Group is the alternative.

Practice Areas:

Business Litigation; Insurance Litigation; Products Liability and Toxic Tort; Employment; Professional Negligence; Fire Litigation; Technology Law.

Bruce  H.  Raymond    Raymond Law Group

Glastonbury, Connecticut   Mr. Raymond’s experience includes cyber liability, data breach, privacy law, professional liability, business litigation, products liability, toxic torts including asbestos, and intellectual property matters. He has litigated personal injury insurance defense cases including trucking, motor vehicle accidents, premises liability, liquor liability E&O, and D&O matters. Attorney Raymond represented Deere & Company in its successful appeal addressing the malfunction theory in products liability cases. Bruce is a Connecticut attorney and has served as Regional Representative on the Board of Directors of DRI and Chairman of DRI's ACMIE (Specialized Litigation Group for Agricultural, Construction, Mining and Industrial Equipment). He is Co-Chair of the Your House Counsel® Recreation and Amusement Liability Practice Group.

Page 30: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

Bacon, Thornton & Palmer L.L.P. provides experienced civil representation throughout the Baltimore-Washington corridor. The firm is AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell and included in the Martindale-Hubbell Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers. With decades of experience, and hundreds of jury verdicts exclusively in the area of civil litigation in the Federal and State courts of Maryland and the District of Columbia, the firm provides aggressive representation with efficient, personal case handling. Our clients include many Insurance and Fortune 500 companies, for which the firm provides representation in a wide array of practice areas. Our founding partners have worked together for over 20 years, with numerous significant decisions reported in the Maryland Appellate Courts, District of Columbia Court of Appeals, and the United States Courts of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and the District of Columbia Circuit. We appreciate having numerous clients of equal long-standing, a fact we attribute to our dedication in providing personal high quality legal representation at efficient costs.

Practice Areas:

Product Liability; Retailer/Employer Liability; Insurance Coverage; Construction Defects and Accidents; Environmental Exposure; Creditor Rights and Liabilities; Employment Law and ERISA Claims; Motor Vehicle Accidents; Intentional Torts; Trademark; Copyright; Commercial Leasing; Corporate Structuring.

Patricia M. Thornton Bacon Thornton & Palmer, LLP

Greenbelt, Maryland   Patricia M. Thornton has 29-years of experience devoted exclusively to civil litigation in the Federal and State courts of Maryland and the District of Columbia. She focuses her practice in the areas of serious personal injury including wrongful death, brain injury and paralysis; motor vehicle accidents, premises liability, products liability, retailer liability, and intentional torts.   Ms. Thornton is a member of the Maryland State Bar Association (Litigation Section; Negligence, Insurance and Workers' Compensation Section), the District of Columbia Bar Association, the District of Columbia Defense Lawyers Association and the Prince George's County Bar Association. She is Co-Chair of the Your House Counsel® Catastrophic Liability Practice Group.

Page 31: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study
Page 32: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study
Page 33: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

ALABAMABirmingham

Miller, Christie & Kinney, P.C.Paul A. Miller,

[email protected]

Kyle L. Kinney,

[email protected]

Vestavia Centre

2090 Columbiana Rd., Suite 3400

Vestavia Hills, AL 35216

Phone: (205) 326-0000

www.mnc-law.com

CALIFORNIA

Clapp Moroney / Bellagamba

Vucinich / Beeman Scheley

Jeffrey M. Vucinich jvucinich@clappmoro,ney.com

Christopher J. Beeman, [email protected]

505 Montgomery Street, 11th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111Phone: (415) 874-3562

www.clappmoroney.com

ALABAMAMobile

Vickers, Riis, Murray and Curran, L.L.C.E. L. McCafferty, III,

[email protected]. Marshall Gardner,

[email protected] Trustmark Building

107 St. Francis Street, 21st FloorMobile, AL 36602

Phone: (251) 432-9772www.vickersriis.com

ARIZONA

Elardo, Bragg, Appel & Rossi

John A. Elardo,[email protected]

Venessa J. Bragg,[email protected]

3001 East Camelback Road, Suite 130Phoenix, AZ 85016

Phone: (602) 889-0272www.ebarlaw.com

COLORADO

Grund, Dagner, & Jung, P.C.

Deana R. Dagner, Partner,

[email protected]

Douglas A. Stevens, Partner,

[email protected]

1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 2800

Denver, CO 80264

Phone: (303) 830-7770

www.gdjlegal.com

CONNECTICUT

Raymond Law Group

Bruce H. Raymond,

[email protected]

90 National Drive

Glastonbury, CT 06033

Phone: (860) 633-0580

www.raymondlawgroup.com

FLORIDA

Powers / McNalis / Torres /

Teebagy / Luongo

Anna D. Torres,

[email protected]

Stephanie H. Luongo,

[email protected]

1601 Belvedere Road Suite 500S

West Palm Beach, FL 33416

Phone: (561) 588-3000

www.powersmcnalis.com

ILLINOIS

Doherty & Progar LLC

Kevin W. Doherty, [email protected]

Mary Jo Greene, [email protected]

200 West Adams Street, Suite 2220Chicago, IL 60606-5231Phone: (312) 630-9630

www.doherty-progar.com

INDIANA

Indianapolis

House Reynolds & Faust, LLP

Briane M. House,

[email protected]

Thomas Todd Reynolds,

[email protected]

11711 North Pennsylvania Street, Suite 190

Carmel, Indiana, 46032

Phone: (317) 564-8490

www.housereynoldsfaust.com

INDIANANorthern

Doherty & Progar LLCKevin W. Doherty,

[email protected] Jo Greene,

[email protected] Georgia Street

Merrillville, Indiana 46410-6224Phone: (219) 513-9000

www.doherty-progar.com

LOUISIANA

Johnson, Johnson, Barrios &

Yacoubian PLC

Alan J. Yacoubian,

[email protected]

René S. Paysse, Jr.,

[email protected]

701 Poydras Street, Suite 4700

New Orleans, LA 70139-7701

Phone: (504) 528-3001

www.jjbylaw.com

MAINE

Petruccelli, Martin & Haddow, LLP

Gerald F. Petruccelli, [email protected]

James B. Haddow, [email protected]

2 Monument Square P.O. Box 17555

Portland, ME 04112 Phone: (207) 775-0200

www.pmhlegal.com

MARYLAND

Bacon, Thornton & Palmer, L.L.P.Edward C. Bacon,

[email protected] M. Thornton,

[email protected] 6411 Ivy Lane Suite 500Greenbelt, MD 20770

Phone: Phone: (301) 345-7001www.lawbtp.com

MASSACHUSETTS

Coughlin Betke LLP

Christopher G. Betke, [email protected]

Andrew R. Ferguson, [email protected]

175 Federal StreetBoston, MA 02110

Phone: (617) 988-8050www.coughlinbetke.com

MICHIGAN

Collins Einhorn Farrell PC

David C. Anderson, [email protected]

Michael J. Sullivan, [email protected]

4000 Town Center, Suite 909

MINNESOTA

Johnson & Lindberg, P.A

Michael C. Lindberg, [email protected]

Mark J. Peschel, [email protected]

780 Northland Plaza3800 American Boulevard West

Minneapolis, MN 55431Phone: (952) 851-0700

www.johnsonlindberg.com

MISSISSIPPI

Anderson Crawley & Burke, pllcJames M. Anderson,

[email protected] D. Crawley,

[email protected] 216 Draperton Court

Ridgeland, MS 39157-3905Phone: (601) 707-8800

www.acblaw.com

MISSOURI

Rynearson, Suess, Schnurbusch

& Champion L.L.C.

Debbie S. Champion,

[email protected]

John Kemppainen,

[email protected]

500 N. Broadway, Suite 1550

St. Louis, MO 63102

Phone: (314) 421-4430

www.rssclaw.com

NEW JERSEY

Shafer Glazer, LLPHoward S. Shafer,

[email protected]

David A. Glazer,

[email protected]

90 John Street, Suite 701

New York, NY 10038

Phone: (212) 267-0011

www.ShaferGlazer.com

NEW YORK

AlbanyFlink Smith LLC

Edward Flink,

449 New Karner RdAlbany, NY 12205

NEW YORK

Downstate

Shafer Glazer, LLP

Howard S. Shafer,

[email protected]

David A. Glazer,

[email protected]

90 John Street, Suite 701

New York, NY 10038

Phone: (212) 267-0011

www.ShaferGlazer.com

NEW YORK

RochesterConnors & Corcoran, PLLC

Eileen E. Buholtz, [email protected]

45 Exchange Blvd.Times Square Building, Suite 250

Rochester, NY 14614Phone: (585) 232-5885

www.connorscorcoran.com

NORTH CAROLINA

Bailey & Dixon, LLPDavid S. Coats,

[email protected] S. Wisz,

[email protected] Fayetteville Street, Suite 2500

Raleigh, NC 27601Phone: (919) 828-0731

www.bdixon.com

OHIO

Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder Co., L.P.A.John T. McLandrich,

[email protected] F. Nicholas Jr.,

[email protected] Franklin’s Row34305 Solon Road

Cleveland, OH 44139Phone: (440) 248-7906

www.mrrlaw.com

OKLAHOMA

Hiltgen & Brewer, P.C.Michael W. Brewer,

[email protected] Cary E. Hiltgen,

[email protected] 9505 North Kelley AvenueOklahoma City, OK 73131

Phone: (405) 605-9000www.hiltgenbrewer.com

OREGON

Smith Freed & Eberhard P.C.

Jeffrey D. Eberhard,

[email protected]

Justin R. Wickizer,

[email protected]

111 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 4300

Portland, OR 97204-3699

Phone: (503) 227-2424

www.SmithFreed.com

PENNSYLVANIA

Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg LLC.Kevin Blake,

[email protected]

Charity Hyde,

[email protected]

1601 Market Street, 16th Floor,

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Phone: (215) 561-4300

www.bbs-law.com

RHODE ISLAND

Hanson Curran LLPMegan J. Goguen,

[email protected]

James T. Murphy,

[email protected]

1 Turks Head Place #550

Providence, RI 02903

Phone: (401) 421-2154

www.hansoncurran.com

TEXASDallas

Carnahan Thomas, LLPMichael S. Carnahan,

[email protected] N. Thomas,

[email protected] N. Carroll Avenue

Southlake, TX 76092Phone: (817) 424-1001

www.CarnahanThomas.com

TEXASHouston

Doyen SebestaScot G. Doyen,

[email protected]

Randall J. Poelma, Jr.,

[email protected]

450 Gears Road, Suite 350

Houston, TX 77067

Phone: (713) 580-8900

www.ds-lawyers.com

WASHINGTON

Smith Freed & Eberhard P.C.Jeffrey D. Eberhard,

[email protected] R. Wickizer,

[email protected] 2nd Ave, 17th Floor

Seattle, Washington 98104Phone: (206) 576-7575 www.SmithFreed.com

WISCONSIN

MilwaukeeDoherty & Progar LLC

Kevin W. Doherty, [email protected]

Mary Jo Greene, [email protected] East Wisconsin Avenue

Suite 1800Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202-4232

Phone: (414) 347-9600www.doherty-progar.com

YourHouseCounsel.com

Page 34: Thurs,june26 440-yhc case-study

A Presentation by