Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)
-
Upload
lester-melendez -
Category
Documents
-
view
31 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS)
Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW)
3SAQS Pilot Project Modeling OverviewUniversity of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON)
October 10, 2014
2
Summary• 3SAQS Pilot Project Timeline and Deliverables• Emissions Inventory Improvements• Key Collaborations and Interactions• Modeling Highlights
– WRF Meteorology– SMOKE Emissions– CAMx Air Quality
• Oil and Gas Inventories• Monitoring Network Analysis• 3SDW Support and Tool Development• Status and Next Steps
3
3SAQS Pilot Project Timeline
2012 2013 2014
OCT 2012Pilot Project
Start
JAN 2013EI Improvement Meetings With
CO, UT, WY
NOV-DEC 2012CO, UT, WY
2008 EI Analysis and Evaluation
FEB 20143SAQS Monitoring
Network Report
OCT 2013WRF 2011
Sensitivities
AUG 2014CAMx 2008b,
WRF 2011, 2011 Oil & Gas EI,
2011a Emissions
JUL 2014Final 2008 Emissions
OCT 2014CAMx 2011a
MPE
SEP 2014SMOKE 2011a
NOV 2014-APR 2015
CAMx 2011 Sensitivities
AUG 2012CAMx 2008a
JUN 2012Emissions VOC
Reactivity Analysis
FEB-MAY 20122008 EI
Modeling
MAR-JUN 20142011 EI
Modeling
4
3SAQS Pilot Project Major Deliverables• Modeling Platforms
– Modeling input/output data, software, and scripts
– 2008 version A and B• SMOKE and CAMx• Base and Future Year
(2020)
– 2011 version A• WRF, SMOKE, and
CAMx• Base and Future Year
(2020)
4
• Emissions– 2011 O&G inventory– Data updates for 3-
state sources– 2008, 2011, 2020
inventories• Fusion of NEI and 3-
state inventories
• Monitoring Network Assessment
5
3SAQS Pilot Project Major Deliverables• Key Analysis Products
– Inventory comparisons– VOC reactivity analysis– Model performance
evaluations• CAMx 2008• WRF 2011• CAMx 2011
– Methane inventory analysis
5
• Modeling Sensitivities– Boundary conditions– US background air
quality– Ammonia emissions– Oil and gas emissions– Winter ozone
6
Key Findings: Meteorology• Completed 2011 WRF
modeling and evaluation• 2008 and 2011 WRF
performance acceptable and comparable
• WRF configuration based on systematic configuration testing
• Episodic performance issues, particularly for winter inversions
6
Observed May 2011 Total Precip (in.)
WRF May 2011 Total Precip (in.)
7
Key Findings: Emissions• New 2011 O&G EI• 2008 > 2011 > 2020
– Trends vary by state/sector/pollutant
– General decrease in emissions through time
– Exception is VOC from O&G sources
7
8
Key Findings: Emissions
• Collaboration with CO, UT, WY state DAQs to obtain data, review emissions, and get feedback on protocols/evaluations
• Updates to key sectors/pollutants– Agricultural NH3 – point CAFO locations used to improve
the spatial allocation of livestock emissions– On-road mobile – link-based VMT from CO used to improve
spatial allocation of on-road mobile sources in CO– Review of 3SAQS updates to temporal and chemical
speciation profiles for nonroad and nonpoint sources
8
9
Key Findings: Emissions
• 2020 – 2011 Emissions– Mostly decreases for all
sectors/pollutants/states except O&G VOC/TOG
– Plots show differences by state (CO, UT, WY)
9
10
Key Findings: Emissions
10
11
Key Findings: Emissions
11
• Methane– 3SAQS one of the first U.S.
regional CTM studies to look at active methane emissions
– Tracer for important regional emissions sectors (O&G and ag)
– O&G is the largest source in the current inventory
– Missing significant agricultural sources: enteric fermentation and livestock waste
12
Emissions ReactivityRTOG = TOG * Profile Total MIR
RTOG/TOG = Relative emission reactivity
Key Findings: Emissions
13
• Emissions Reactivity– Reactivity-based analysis of
inventories focuses on sources with greatest ozone formation potential
– Different sources are dominant using reactivity weighting vs. mass-based analysis
– Reactivity analysis is dependent on validity of inventory and chemical speciation
Key Findings: Emissions
14
Key Findings: Air Quality 2008 Annual 4th Highest Daily Max 8-hour Average O3
14
Orange is the cutoff for different O3 standards 65 ppb 70 ppb
75 ppb
15
Key Findings: Air Quality 2020 Annual 4th Highest Daily Max 8-hour Average O3
15
Orange is the cutoff for different O3 standards 65 ppb 70 ppb
75 ppb
16
Key Findings: Air Quality
16
• 4th highest MDA8 O3 decreases up to 25 ppb
• Widespread decreases of 1-3 ppb for most of the 3-state region
• 1-3 ppb increases in O&G development areas
2020 - 2008
17
Key Findings: Air Quality
17
• 4th highest MDA8 O3 decreases up to 25 ppb
• Widespread decreases of 1-3 ppb for most of the 3-state region
• 1-3 ppb increases in O&G development areas
2020 - 2008
18
Key Findings: Air Quality 2008 Annual 4th Highest Daily Max 8-hour Average O3
18
Orange is the cutoff for different O3 standards 65 ppb 70 ppb
75 ppb
19
Key Findings: Air Quality 2011 Annual 4th Highest Daily Max 8-hour Average O3
19
Orange is the cutoff for different O3 standards 65 ppb 70 ppb
75 ppb
20
Key Findings: Air QualityAnnual Average PM2.5
20
Orange is the cutoff for 12 ug/m3 2008 2020 (2008-based)
2011
Oil and Gas Emissions Development Activities
• 2011 base year inventories developed for all major basins in the 3 states– Uinta (UT)– Piceance (CO)– D-J (CO)– All Wyoming Basins (WY)– Raton Basin (CO/NM)– Paradox Basin (UT)– South San Juan Basin (NM)
• 2020 projections developed for all basins
• 2011/2020 emissions processed through SMOKE and model-ready
Oil and Gas Emissions Development Activities
• 2011 base year inventories provide updated county-level and by-source category NOx and VOC emissions
• Developed by projecting older inventories forward to 2011 considering changes in production and activity, as well as regulatory effects on emission sources
• Further projections conducted out to 2020 using historic development trends and forecasts, regulatory effects on inventories
• Emissions processed and gridded using SMOKE including industry-specific speciation profiles and detailed spatial allocation of wells and production
Forecasting Activity to 2020
2020 gas production forecast in the Uinta Basin
0
100,000,000
200,000,000
300,000,000
400,000,000
500,000,000
600,000,000
700,000,000
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
Gas
Pro
ducti
on [m
cf]
Year
Uinta Basin: Conventional Gas Well Gas Production
Conventional GasWell GasProduction (mcf)projected
Projection:- Linear- Temporal Basis: 2010-2012
Example Controls Analysis
Federal regulatory controls in the Piceance Basin in 2020
Source Category Regulation
Enforcing Agency Effective Date
RegulationImplementation in the 2020 Piceance
Basin Emissions ProjectionsFederal
Drill RigsNonroad engine Tier standards (1-4)
US EPAPhase in from 1996 -
2014
Assumed fleetwide emissions control based on EPA NONROAD model default estimates
Emissions reduction due to fleet turn over
Workover RigsNonroad engine Tier standards (1-4)
US EPAPhase in from 1996 -
2014
Assumed fleetwide emissions control based on EPA NONROAD model default estimates
Emissions reduction due to fleet turn over
Well Completions Subpart OOOO US EPA Phase in from 2015
Assumed all gas well completions from 2015 make use of REC technology with a 95% efficiency
Emissions reduction due to RE Ctechnology
Oil and Gas Inventory Results for 2011/2020
2011 2020 2011 2020 2011 2020 2011 2020 2011 2020D-J Basin 21,063 29,987 130,811 383,928 15,757 24,494 63 107 647 631Piceance Basin 17,171 18,994 67,427 78,254 11,825 14,212 445 546 907 717North San Juan Basin 5,593 5,392 2,079 2,036 6,285 6,027 1 <1 40 41Uinta Basin 17,834 28,883 113,620 180,622 12,234 23,999 49 44 651 943South San Juan Basin 40,789 42,119 45,345 44,045 21,899 23,055 733 698 566 512Wind River Basin 1,224 1,267 6,139 6,714 2,695 2,920 2,546 2,778 158 167Powder River Basin 10,569 10,228 52,707 88,641 7,484 7,270 205 315 520 503Sotuhwest Wyoming Basin 12,766 12,761 61,325 71,704 7,798 8,022 1,512 1,444 539 560Big Horn Basin 2,314 2,090 3,697 3,641 984 892 4,184 4,054 75 61Paradox Basin* 1,045 975 1,624 1,590 830 774 215 200 19 17Raton Basin* 6,427 6,427 621 620 5,762 5,763 5 5 24 24
Emissions (tons/yr)
BasinNOx VOC CO Sox PM
* Permitted emissions only
Example Emissions by Source Category
2011 NOx emissions by source category in the D-J Basin
Drill rigs25%
Exempt engines19%
Heaters4%
Workover rigs3%
Compressor Engines47%
Other Categories1%
NOx Emissions Basin-wide (tons/year): 21,063NOx Emissions Basin-wide (tons/year): 21,063
Example Emissions by Source Category
Survey-based Fugitives8%
Condensate Tanks72%
Pneumatic devices6%
Pneumatic pumps1%
Natural Gas Production, Flares
2%Truck loading of
condensate liquid1%
Venting - blowdowns2%
Compressor Engines2%
Other Categories3%
VOC Emissions Basin-wide (tons/year): 130,811
2011 VOC emissions by source category in the D-J Basin
Example Emissions by County
2011 NOx emissions by county in the Uinta Basin
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
Carbon Duchesne Emery Grand Uintah Wasatch
NO
x E
mis
sio
ns
(to
ns/
year
)
County
Other Categories
Oil Well Truck Loading
Midstream (Unclassified)
Oil Tanks
Condensate tanks
Dehydrator
Venting - Compressor Shutdown
Venting - Compressor Startup
Artificial Lift Engines
Miscellaneous engines
Fugitives
Pneumatic pumps
Pneumatic devices
Heaters
Drill rigs
Compressor engines
Example Processed and Gridded O&G Emissions
June 2011 gridded oil and gas emissions in 4-km modeling domain
Ongoing Oil and Gas Tasks and Next Steps
• Ongoing work– Data mining of US EPA Tribal Minor New Source Review (MNSR)
data on tribal land to improve emissions sources – Guidance document on incorporation of 3SAQS regional
emissions into project analyses
• Potential future work– Improved projection methodologies for midstream and other
permitted sources or sources provided by state agencies– Additional survey efforts to update key source category data in
key basins
31
Monitoring Network Assessment RecommendationsOperations Through 2017
• Assessment of ozone monitoring data, meteorology, and unmonitored areas, as well as expected changes in emissions indicate that the existing 3SAQS cooperator group-funded site locations/areas should continue operating through 2017.
• Recommending slight changes to some existing site locations, as well as adding new sites.
• There are two sets of recommendations, for calendar 2014 and for 2015 to 2017.
• Assessment was reviewed and approved by the Steering Committee in May 2014.– Final assessment materials available on the 3-State Data Warehouse
website (http://views.cira.colostate.edu/documents/Projects/TSDW/Projects/MonitoringNetworkAssessment/)
31
32
Prototype Web-Based Source Apportionment Visualization Tool
• Develop on-line tool for the 3SDW that can visualize ozone and PM source apportionment modeling results
• Use WestJumpAQMS state-specific and source category-specific ozone source apportionment results to test the tool– Daily maximum 8-hour ozone for Geographic (state-
specific) and Source Category SA runs• In 3SAQS will expand from 10 highest ozone days
to all days and monitors in domain
33
SrcApp Visualization Selection• Currently two options
Select Rocky Flats North, CO on July 9, 2008
Geographic
Source Category
35
Web-Based SA Visualization Tool
• Refine prototype SA visualization tool• Populate with 3SAQS CAMx and CMAQ SA
runs when available– Daily maximum 8-hour ozone and 24-hour PM2.5
concentrations at all monitors in domain– Annual deposition and daily visibility impairment
at IMPROVE monitors• Implement on 3SDW
36
Status and Next Steps• Pilot study modeling work status• Plans for October 2014 – April 2015
– 2011 CMAQ modeling– 2011 AQ sensitivity modeling
• Boundary Conditions• Background Air Quality• Oil & Gas• Winter Ozone• Ammonia• Vertical Transport• MOVES2014
• Reference 9/30 presentation
37
3SAQS Pilot Study Modeling StatusDeliverable Status
2008 Modeling Platform
2008 Modeling Protocol Completed (4/2014)
SMOKE 36/12-km 2008a Completed (5/2014)
SMOKE 36/12-km 2008b Completed (7/2014)
CAMx 36/12-km 2008b Completed (8/2014)
CAMx 2008a MPE Report Ready for Review (9/2014)
SMOKE 36/12-km 2020a_08 Completed (7/2014)
CAMx 36/12-km 2020a_08 Completed (8/2014)
2011 Modeling Platform
2011 Modeling Protocol Completed (7/2014)
WRF 36/12/4-km 2011a Completed (5/2014)
WRF 2011 MPE Report Ready for Review (8/2014)
SMOKE 36/12/4-km 2011a Completed (8/2014)
CAMx 36/12/4-km 2011a Completed (9/2014)
CAMx 36/12/4-km 2020a_11 Running (11/2014)
38
2011 US Background Air Quality• July 2011 US Background