This presentation and discussion will contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the...
-
Upload
anthony-reddell -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of This presentation and discussion will contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the...
This presentation and discussion will contain forward-looking statements within the meaning
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” or similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. These statements are based on Marten’s current plans and expectations and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause future
activities and results of operations to be materially different from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. For further information, please refer to Marten’s reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Disclosure
2
“Perhaps the greatest challenge business leaders face today is how to stay competitive amid constant
turbulence and disruption.”“Accelerate!”
Harvard Business ReviewNovember 2012
By John P. KotterKonosuke Matsushita
Professor of Leadership, EmeritusHarvard Business School
“Managers may believe that industry structuresare ordained by the Good Lord, but they can – and often do –
change overnight.”
“The Discipline of Innovation”Harvard Business Review
May-June 1985By Peter F. Drucker
Marten’s CulturePeople Focused on Today’s Accelerated Business Environment
3
Marten’s Strategic Vision
Multifaceted Transportation Service Solutions• Truckload Business Platform – regional and OTR operating from 14 regional service centers
• Dedicated Business Platform – customized solutions tailored to individual customers’ requirements utilizing refrigerated trailers, dry vans and other specialized equipment
• Brokerage Business Platform – surge flexibility to service our customer needs beyond Marten’s assets
• MRTN de Mexico Business Platform - door-to-door Mexican business service with our Mexican partner carriers
• Intermodal Business Platform – refrigerated TOFC with extended dray service from Marten’s truck network
Continued business transition with strategic focus on regional, dedicated and MRTN de Mexico 4
Diverse, Dense and Efficient Freight Network
•Top five accounts – 27% of revenue in 2014 vs. 43% in 2009
•No current account more than 10% of revenue in 2014 - Wal-Mart increased primarily with additional dedicated freight – the percentage of other larger accounts (with none more than 6%) continues to decrease with growth in other existing and additional accounts
•Load count has increased 37% from 2009 to 2014
•Miles per tractor has increased 6% from 2009 to 2014
•Diverse, dense and efficient freight network critical to better driver jobs
5
$2,600
$2,800
$3,000
$3,200
$3,400
$3,600
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Top 5 Customers' % of Revenue Rev/ Tractor/Wk
Diverse, Dense and Efficient Freight Network
Revenue per tractor has increased 27% from 2009 to 2014 with Q4 ’14 being our nineteenth consecutive quarterly year-over-year increase and with Oct’14 our best month at $3,747 6
Truckload and Dedicated Tractors
2,1402,1602,1802,2002,2202,2402,2602,2802,3002,3202,340
Dec 31, '13 Mar 31, '14 June 30, '14 Sept 30, '14 Dec 31, '14
The organic growth of 161 tractors, or 7.4%, in 2014 is a direct result of our continuing efforts to grow our dedicated operations and to compensate our drivers for their non-driving time like no other carrier in today’s electronic log era
2014 Organic Growth
8
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Truckload and Dedicated Brokerage Intermodal
Load Growth
7.4%5.5
%
2.5%
7.4%
10.2%
9
Regional Operating Centers Growth
Tucker, GA
Indianapolis, IN
Desoto, TX
Laredo, TX
Phoenix, AZ
Mondovi, WI
Richmond, VA
Mondovi, WI Corporate Office
Tampa, FL
Kansas City, KS
Memphis, TN
Carlisle, PA
Mira Loma, CA
Wilsonville, OR
THE FOUNDATION of Marten’s service and growth
Our operating centers expanded and were paid for in challenging times
2007 Terminal Locations
Terminal Locations Added- Only Carlisle and Otay Mesa are leased
Otay Mesa, CA
10
0200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,000
Dec '07 Dec '09 Dec '11 Dec '13 Dec '14
Regional Dedicated
Regional Truckload and Dedicated Operations Growth
# o
f T
ract
ors
Increased number of dedicated customers from 2 at Dec’11 to 11 at Dec’13 to 23 at Dec’14
11080
569
671,392
109227
1,448 1,462
421
11
Door-to-door cost saving solutions
Revenue Growth(including fuel surcharge)In millions
Mexico Growth
85% increase in revenue Q4’14 vs. Q4’13
$0$5
$10$15$20$25$30$35$40$45$50$55$60$65
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
84%
60% 24%
28%
•Expanded into Western Mexico with Otay Mesa facility in Sept ’13•Moved into new, larger company-owned Laredo facility in Dec ’13•Opening another entry facility location in ’15
64%
12
Brokerage Growth
Load Growth
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Q4'13 Q4'14$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Q4'13 Q4'14
41%
63%
Revenue Growth(including fuel surcharge)
In millions
16%
18%16%
17%
Initiated in 2005 to provide surge capability for our customers
28%10%8% -1%
Gross margin improved from 13.6% in 2013 to 14.2% in 2014
24% 32%
Decentralization of brokerage operations and rate increases drove improved results in 2014
4% 8%
13
Intermodal Growth
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Yearly Load Growth
57%
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Yearly Revenue Growth(excluding fuel surcharge)
In millions
29%
Initiated temperature-controlled TOFC in ’05
We are the largest truckload intermodal temperature-controlled carrier with BNSF
Expanded intermodal growth with longer drayage supported by our regional business platform
11%8%
21%29%13%
10%
39% 30%
16%5%
14
Intermodal Results – Reflecting Rail Service Issues – Q4 ’14 Start of
Turnaround• Rail service improved somewhat in Q4’14
• Increased our rates during Q4 ’14 to recover
costs for rail service delays
• Continuously decreasing refueling costs on
the rail
• Rail service is expected to improve in last half
of ’15 with $11.5 billion capital expenditures
planned for BNSF for ’14 and ’15
• We expect our intermodal operations to benefit from the market’s continuing
tight capacity
as rail service improves. Our intermodal operations are planned to be a key
business
platform in a continuously tightening-capacity driver market with the rail
infrastructure build
and no highway infrastructure build
($150)
$50
$250
$450
$650
$850
$1,050
$1,250
$1,450
Q1'13 Q1'14 Q2'13 Q2'14 Q3'13 Q3'14 Q4'13 Q4'14
In thousandsOperating Income (Loss)
15
Recognition for Efficiency, Innovation and Integrity
• Forbes’ Top 100 Most Trustworthy Companies – one of only 4 companies named for the 4th time in the last 5 years surveyed Recognized U.S. exchange-listed companies displaying the highest
corporate integrity, clear financial reporting and transparent corporate governance
• McDonald’s/Armada Global Best of Green 2012 Award
• SmartWay Excellence Award
• Thermo King Energy Efficiency Leader Award
• Commercial Carrier Journal’s Innovator of the Year
16
In millions
Net Capital Expenditures
$81.2
$48.4
$88.1$72.8
$118.6$110
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Estimate17
Average Monthly Depreciation
Increasing Revenue Equipment Costs
Tractors
• The monthly depreciation of tractors and trailers added in 2014 was 19% and 18% higher than the depreciation of tractors and trailers traded in 2014
• 1,156 new 2013 CARB-required refrigeration units in service as of Dec 31, 2014
Trailers
$1,185$1,219
$1,266
$1,349
$1,413
$1,462
$1,000$1,050$1,100$1,150$1,200$1,250$1,300$1,350$1,400$1,450$1,500
Dec '09 Dec '10 Dec '11 Dec '12 Dec '13 Dec '14
$339
$355
$368$372
$382$387
$300
$310$320$330$340$350$360$370$380$390$400
Dec '09 Dec '10 Dec '11 Dec '12 Dec '13 Dec '14
18
Increasing Driver Pay
$0.40
$0.42
$0.44
$0.46
$0.48
$0.50
$0.52
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Annual driver pay increases not sacrificed for continuous margin
improvement
• Built a driver pay package unique to the electronic log era
• Industry leader to compensate drivers after one hour of detention, for inclement weather, and road service delays
Cen
ts p
er M
ile
19
Operating Statistics Comparison
Truckload and Dedicated:Q4’14Q4’14 vs. vs.
Q4’13Q4’132014 vs. 2014 vs.
201320132014 vs. 2014 vs.
20092009
Average revenue, net of fuel surcharges, per tractor per week
3.3% 3.1% 26.6%
Miles per tractor 0.8% (0.3)% 6.1%
Loads 5.4% 1.0% 27.4%
Loads per tractor per week 1.2% 0.6% 35.0%
Intermodal loads (7.9)% 15.7% 145.1%
Brokerage loads 23.5% 4.5% 93.9%
20
2014 Segment Information(Dollars in Thousands) Q1Q1 Q2Q2 Q3Q3 Q4Q4 20142014
Operating revenue:
Truckload, net of fuel s/c revenue $86,802 $90,316 $89,515 $91,825 $358,458
Truckload fuel s/c revenue 23,712 23,699 21,821 20,583 89,815
Total Truckload revenue $110,514$114,01
5$111,336 $112,408 $448,273
Dedicated, net of fuel s/c revenue $10,728 $11,845 $15,756 $18,280 $56,609
Dedicated fuel s/c revenue 2,822 3,245 3,995 3,681 13,743
Total Dedicated revenue $13,550 $15,090 $19,751 $21,961 $70,352
Operating ratio:
Truckload 94.4% 90.9% 90.6% 88.9% 91.2%
Dedicated 90.2 90.5 89.6 89.4 89.9
Intermodal 98.0 98.2 100.6 95.9 98.2
Brokerage 94.4 95.4 95.5 95.9 95.4
Consolidated operating ratio 94.6% 92.3% 92.4% 90.6% 92.4%
Operating ratio, ex fuel s/c:
Truckload 92.9% 88.5% 88.3% 86.5% 89.0%
Dedicated 87.7 87.9 87.0 87.2 87.4
Intermodal 97.4 97.6 100.8 94.7 97.7
Brokerage 94.4 95.4 95.5 95.9 95.4
Consolidated operating ratio, ex fuel s/c
93.2% 90.5% 90.7% 88.7% 90.7%21
2013 Segment Information(Dollars in Thousands) Q1Q1 Q2Q2 Q3Q3 Q4Q4 20132013
Operating revenue:
Truckload, net of fuel s/c revenue $89,654 $91,178 $93,854 $92,112 $366,798
Truckload fuel s/c revenue $25,186 $24,647 $24,694 $23,634 $98,161
Total Truckload revenue $114,840$115,82
5$118,548 $115,746 $464,959
Dedicated, net of fuel s/c revenue $5,311 $8,818 $9,291 $10,106 $33,526
Dedicated fuel s/c revenue $1,583 $2,209 $2,441 $2,561 $8,794
Total Dedicated revenue $6,894 $11,027 $11,732 $12,667 $42,320
Operating ratio:
Truckload 92.0% 91.6% 91.0% 91.6% 91.5%
Dedicated 89.0% 85.4% 86.0% 87.7% 86.8%
Intermodal 93.9% 95.4% 96.8% 96.3% 95.7%
Brokerage 94.2% 94.2% 95.1% 95.8% 94.8%
Consolidated operating ratio 92.4% 91.9% 91.8% 92.4% 92.1%
Operating ratio, ex fuel s/c:
Truckload 89.7% 89.3% 88.7% 89.5% 89.3%
Dedicated 85.7% 81.7% 82.3% 84.6% 83.4%
Intermodal 92.1% 94.1% 95.9% 95.3% 94.4%
Brokerage 94.2% 94.2% 95.1% 95.8% 94.8%
Consolidated operating ratio, ex fuel s/c
90.6% 89.9% 89.9% 90.6% 90.2%22
2014 Segment Information
Q1Q1 Q2Q2 Q3Q3 Q4Q4 20142014
Truckload Segment:
Avg. revenue, net of fuel s/c revenue, per tractor per week
$3,507 $3,655 $3,611 $3,698 $3,618
Avg. tractors 1,925 1,901 1,886 1,890 1,900
Avg. miles per trip 683 676 674 696 682
Non- revenue miles percentage 9.3% 9.9% 9.6% 8.5% 9.3%
Total miles (in thousands) 49,503 50,589 49,067 50,009 199,168
Dedicated Segment:
Avg. revenue, net of fuel s/c revenue, per tractor per week
$3,447 $3,234 $3,267 $3,359 $3,322
Avg. tractors 242 282 367 414 327
Avg. miles per trip 338 335 327 346 337
Non- revenue miles percentage 1.3% 1.7% 3.3% 2.8% 2.4%
Total miles (in thousands) 5,916 6,608 8,786 10,233 31,543
23
2013 Segment Information
Q1Q1 Q2Q2 Q3Q3 Q4Q4 20132013
Truckload Segment:
Avg. revenue, net of fuel s/c revenue, per tractor per week
$3,376 $3,461 $3,522 $3,528 $3,471
Avg. tractors 2,065 2,026 2,028 1,987 2,027
Avg. miles per trip 649 639 639 652 645
Non- revenue miles percentage 10.6% 10.8% 10.5% 9.9% 10.4%
Total miles (in thousands) 52,856 53,300 53,315 51,651 211,122
Dedicated Segment:
Avg. revenue, net of fuel s/c revenue, per tractor per week
$3,240 $3,431 $3,384 $3,465 $3,396
Avg. tractors 128 198 209 222 189
Avg. miles per trip 391 356 344 332 350
Non- revenue miles percentage 12.3% 8.2% 9.4% 5.0% 8.2%
Total miles (in thousands) 2,980 5,104 5,316 5,646 19,046
24
Revenue per Tractor Growth
$2,500
$2,750
$3,000
$3,250
$3,500
$3,750
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Q4'13 Q4'14
Average Revenue, Net of Fuel Surcharges, per Tractor per Week
6.5%
5.6%
3.8%
3.1%
5.2%
Revenue per tractor has increased 27% from 2009 to 2014 with Q4’14 being our nineteenth consecutive quarterly year-over-year increase
3.3%
25
Financial HighlightsQ4’14 net income and operating revenue were the highest in
Marten’s history
(All amounts in millions except per share amounts)
Since 2008 we have expended $75 million on buildings and land
Q4’14 Q4’13 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009Operating revenue $173.5 $166.2 $672.9 $659.2 $638.5 $603.7 $516.9 $505.9Net income $9.0 $7.3 $29.8 $30.1 $27.3 $24.3 $19.7 $16.3Diluted EPS $0.27 $0.22 $0.89 $0.90 $0.82 $0.73 $0.60 $0.49Diluted EPS growth 22.7% (1.1)% 9.9% 12.3% 21.7% 22.4%
Dec. 31, 2014 Dec. 31, 2013Cash and cash equivalents $0.1 $13.7Total assets $579.7 $525.8Stockholders' equity $387.9 $359.1Long-term debt $24.4 $-
26
Marten People Drive Our Freight and Cost Efficiencies and
Profitable Growth• People Initiate and Implement Our Strategic Vision
and Key Strategic Initiatives
• “The more they know, the more they’ll understand. The more they understand, the more they’ll care. Once they care, there’s no stopping them.” –Sam Walton
• Marten’s culture: Visible costs and operating data to improve and add value daily
27
Marten People Drive Our Freight and Cost Efficiencies and
Profitable Growth• Sustainable Cost and Productivity Improvements Driven
by our People and Ongoing Development of our Systems and Processes Continuous Revenue per Tractor Growth Continuous Tractor and Trailer Miles Utilization Improvement Continuous Fuel MPG Improvement Continuous Increased Drivers’ Hours Continuous Customer Collaboration Continuous Improvement of our Diverse, Dense and Efficient
Freight Network Continuous Driver Pay Plan Improvement Built for Electronic Log
Era Continuous Driver Job Improvement
• Bottom Line – Revenue per tractor has increased 27% from 2009 to 2014 with Q4’14 being our nineteenth consecutive quarterly year- over-year increase
28
Continued Improvement Despite Challenging Industry Headwinds
Operating Ratio, Net of Fuel Surcharge
Ratio improved to 88.7% in Q4’14 from 90.6% in Q4’13
The ratio for Q4’14 was our best since Q4’04, when our operations were over 98% truckload
93.5%
92.0%
91.2%91.1%
90.2%
90.7%
90%
91%
92%
93%
94%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
29
82% increase from 2009 to 2014
Continued Improvement Despite Challenging Industry Headwinds
Earnings – Cents Per Diluted Share
EPS improved 23% to $0.27 in Q4’14 from $0.22 in Q4’13
$0.00
$0.20
$0.40
$0.60
$0.80
$1.00
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
22%
22%
12%10% (1)%
30
Marten’s Culture | Marten’s Vision
Marten’s People“Sufficient urgency around a strategically rational and emotionally exciting opportunity is the
bedrock upon which all else is built.”
“Accelerate!”
Harvard Business Review
November 2012
By John P. Kotter
Konosuke Matsushita
Professor of Leadership, Emeritus
Harvard Business School
Marten’s people have built a strong business platform based on our truckload operations in turbulent times and we envision a bright, profitable growth outlook over the next several
years
32